[DOCID: f:sr416.110] From the Senate Reports Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] Calendar No. 876 110th Congress Report SENATE 2d Session 110-416 ====================================================================== ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2009 _______ July 14, 2008.--Ordered to be printed _______ Mr. Dorgan, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany S. 3258] The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 3258) making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes, favorably thereon and recommends that the bill do pass. Amount in new budget (obligational) authority, fiscal year 2009 Total of bill as reported to the Senate................. $33,767,000,000 Amount of 2008 appropriations........................... 31,508,398,000 Amount of 2009 budget estimate.......................... 31,695,700,000 Bill as recommended to Senate compared to-- 2008 appropriations................................. +2,258,602,000 2009 budget estimate................................ +2,071,300,000 CONTENTS ---------- Page Purpose.......................................................... 4 Summary of Estimates and Recommendations......................... 4 Title I: Department of Defense--Civil: Department of the Army: Corps of Engineers--Civil: General Investigations............................... 21 Construction, General................................ 33 Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries..... 53 Operation and Maintenance, General................... 56 Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies................ 79 Regulatory Program................................... 79 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program...... 80 General Expenses..................................... 81 General Provisions--Corps of Engineers--Civil........ 83 Title II: Department of the Interior: Central Utah Project Completion Account.................. 85 Bureau of Reclamation: Water and Related Resources.......................... 85 Central Valley Project Restoration Fund.............. 93 California Bay-Delta Restoration..................... 94 Policy and Administration............................ 94 General Provisions--Department of the Interior........... 94 Title III: Department of Energy: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy................... 97 Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.......... 104 Nuclear Energy....................................... 105 Fossil Energy Research and Development............... 107 Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves............... 110 Strategic Petroleum Reserve.......................... 110 Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve................... 110 Energy Information Administration.................... 110 Non-defense Environmental Cleanup........................ 111 Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund................................................... 113 Science.................................................. 113 High Energy Physics.................................. 113 Nuclear Physics...................................... 114 Biological and Environmental Research................ 114 Basic Energy Sciences................................ 116 Nuclear Waste Disposal................................... 118 Departmental Administration.............................. 119 Office of Inspector General.............................. 120 Atomic Energy Defense Activities: National Nuclear Security Administration: Weapons Activities............................... 120 Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation................. 127 Naval Reactors................................... 129 Office of the Administrator...................... 129 Environmental and Other Defense Activities: Defense Environmental Cleanup........................ 129 Other Defense Activities............................. 133 Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal....................... 133 Power Marketing Administrations: Operation and Maintenance, Southeastern Power Administration................................. 134 Operation and Maintenance, Southwestern Power Administration................................. 134 Construction, Rehabilitation, Operation and Maintenance, Western Area Power Administration. 134 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission: Salaries and Expenses........................................... 135 General Provisions--Department of Energy................. 157 Title IV: Independent Agencies: Appalachian Regional Commission.......................... 158 Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.................. 159 Delta Regional Authority................................. 159 Denali Commission........................................ 159 Nuclear Regulatory Commission............................ 159 Office of Inspector General.......................... 160 Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board..................... 160 Tennessee Valley Authority Office of the Inspector General................................................ 161 Title V: General Provisions...................................... 162 Compliance With Paragraph 7, Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules of the Senate......................................................... 163 Compliance With Paragraph 7(c), Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules of the Senate......................................................... 163 Compliance With Paragraph 12, Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules of the Senate......................................................... 164 Budgetary Impact Statement....................................... 173 Disclosure of Congressionally Directed Spending Items............ 173 PURPOSE The purpose of this bill is to provide appropriations for the fiscal year 2009 beginning October 1, 2008, and ending September 30, 2009, for energy and water development, and for other related purposes. It supplies funds for water resources development programs and related activities of the Department of the Army, Civil Functions--U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Civil Works Program in title I; for the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation in title II; for the Department of Energy's energy research activities, including environmental restoration and waste management, and atomic energy defense activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in title III; and for related independent agencies and commissions, including the Appalachian Regional Commission, Delta Regional Authority, Denali Commission, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in title IV. SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES AND RECOMMENDATIONS The fiscal year 2009 budget estimates for the bill total $31,695,700,000 in new budget (obligational) authority. The recommendation of the Committee totals $33,767,000,000. This is $2,071,300,000 above the budget estimates and $2,258,602,000 above the enacted appropriation for the current fiscal year. Subcommittee Hearings The Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water held six sessions in connection with the fiscal year 2009 appropriation bill. Witnesses included officials and representatives of the Federal agencies under the subcommittee's jurisdiction. The recommendations for fiscal year 2009 therefore, have been developed after careful consideration of available data. Votes in the Committee By a vote of 28 to 10 the Committee on July 10, 2008, recommended that the bill, as amended, be reported to the Senate. TITLE I DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Corps of Engineers--Civil INTRODUCTION The Corps of Engineers is made up of approximately 35,000 civilian and 650 military members that perform both military and civil works functions. The military and civilian engineers, scientists and other specialists work hand in hand as leaders in engineering and environmental matters. The diverse workforce of biologists, engineers, geologists, hydrologists, natural resource managers and other professionals meets the demands of changing times and requirements as a vital part of America's Army. The Corps' mission is to provide quality, responsive engineering services to the Nation including: --Planning, designing, building and operating water resources and other civil works projects. (Navigation, Flood Control, Environmental Protection, Disaster Response, et cetera) --Designing and managing the construction of military facilities for the Army and Air Force. (Military Construction) --Providing design and construction management support for other Defense and Federal agencies. (Interagency and International Services) The Energy and Water bill only funds the Civil Works missions of the Corps of Engineers. Approximately 23,000 civilians and about 190 military officers are responsible for this nationwide mission. From our hundreds of rivers, lakes and wetlands to our thousands of miles of coastal shoreline, we are fortunate in America to enjoy an abundance of water resources. As a Nation, we value these resources for their natural beauty; for the many ways they help meet human needs; and for the fact that they provide habitat for thousands of species of plants, fish and wildlife. The Congress has given the Corps of Engineers the responsibility of helping to care for these important aquatic resources. Through its Civil Works program the Corps carries out a wide array of projects that provide: --Coastal storm damage reduction --Disaster preparedness and response --Environmental protection and restoration --Flood damage reduction --Hydropower --Navigable waters --Recreational opportunities --Regulatory oversight --Water supply One of the biggest challenges the Corps and other Government agencies face is finding the right balance among the often conflicting concerns our society has related to our water resources. Society wants these resources to help fuel economic growth (navigation, hydropower). Society wants them to provide social benefits (recreation). And finally society wants to be sure that they are available for future generations (environmental protection and restoration). The Corps is charged with seeking to achieve the best possible balance among these competing demands through an integrated approach to water resources management that focuses on regional solutions, involving an array of stakeholders (that is other Government agencies, environmental groups, businesses and private organizations). In recent years, the Corps has implemented this approach largely by concentrating on watersheds. OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2009 BUDGET REQUEST The fiscal year 2009 budget request for the Corps of Engineers is composed of $4,741,000,000 in new budget authority. This is a decrease of $130,000,000 from the fiscal year 2008 request. The President's overall budget priorities are stated to be to (1) continue long-term economic growth, (2) win the global war on terror, and (3) secure the homeland. The Committee fails to understand how this budget proposal for the Corps complies with either goal 1 or goal 3. How can one be taken seriously about providing for long term economic growth when one is proposing less funding for national infrastructure that contributes to economic growth than had been proposed in the previous year. It is certainly not because a large number of projects were completed in fiscal year 2008 or that a considerable amount of backlogged maintenance work was done. It appears to once again be a short-sighted budgetary decision. The Committee finds it remarkable that the administration can request and receive billions of dollars for infrastructure improvements in other countries and yet continues to shortchange our own. This budget request is more than $846,000,000 less than the fiscal year 2008 enacted budget for the Corps. The fiscal year 2008 enacted amount was contained in a bill the President signed that comported to his top-line budget numbers. However, once again, it appears that the baseline for the Corps budget is not the enacted amount but the amount the President proposes. If the administration would accept the reality of the Nation's infrastructure needs and budget accordingly, the gulf between the budget request and the enacted amount might not be as large. At a time when this existing infrastructure, the foundation of our economic security and quality of life, is depreciating much faster than it is being recapitalized, when our increasing population is placing much greater stress on the Nation's vital water resources, when shifts in population centers mean new and different problems and when a growing environmental awareness requires new solutions to persistent problems, this underfunding is unacceptable and threatens our continued well- being. The Nation has been struck by a number of natural disasters over the last several years ranging from hurricanes, tornados, nor'easters and river flooding. This Committee has appropriated more than $14,000,000,000 to the Corps of Engineers to cope with the effects of these disasters on Federal facilities or facilities that are part of the Federal protection systems. This is more than six times the annual construction budget of the Corps. Some of these damages may not have been incurred had more robust infrastructure budgets been proposed by this and prior administrations. Yet no lesson seems to be learned from these disasters. The current flooding in the Midwest is in many ways a predictable repeat of the 1993 flood. Few of the recommendations made after that event were implemented. If they had, much of the damage and suffering currently occurring might have been avoided. Congress has successfully increased investments in our Nation's infrastructure over the last 8 years however these increases have most often been accomplished without the active support of the administration. The administration budget continues the trend of underfunding the General Investigations [GI] account thereby depriving us of the Nation's primary tool to identify future challenges and develop innovative solutions to water resources challenges and needs. The fiscal year 2002 GI request was $130,000,000. This has declined to $91,000,000 in fiscal year 2009. Compare this to the fiscal year 2008 enacted amount of $167,000,000. This decline is not due to a reduction in water resources needs, rather, it appears to be a deliberate attempt to choke off the Corps planning program. Of the $91,000,000 recommended in the budget request less than 50 percent is for actual studies that might eventually become projects. Nearly half of these study funds are dedicated to a single study. Therefore, the rest of the Nation has to share a little over $21,000,000 for all of the rest of the studies in the Nation. This budget request greatly inhibits the Corps ability to do proper planning or to address workforce considerations. Budgets such as these, if enacted, will erode the Corps technical competency in the planning area. Planning in the Corps is a specialized skillset and once that ability is lost, it is difficult to reestablish. Most of the criticisms of the Corps project development process in recent years have centered on the planning process. The administration is providing funding for some improvements to the Planning program such as funding the Planning Associates Program and Planning Centers of Expertise. However, planning studies have to be undertaken to utilize these improvements. The Committee believes that the Corps should have a robust planning program to not only address new water resource needs but to evaluate changes throughout the project development process. Continued budgets like this will lead to a complete loss of this vital Corps of Engineers' competency. The administration should seriously revise their priorities for this account in the fiscal year 2010 budget. The Construction, General [CG] and Operation and Maintenance [O&M] accounts have to be discussed jointly due to the way the budget request blurs the line between the traditional project split between the two accounts. Priorities for the CG account are based on six criteria for fiscal year 2009. The primary criterion again is the project's benefit to cost ratio [BCR]. Projects with high risk to human safety and a BCR greater than 1.5 or are significant or cost effective aquatic ecosystem restoration projects are given funding for current contract needs. No new construction starts met the administration's new start criteria for fiscal year 2009. Projects complying with treaties and biological opinions and/or meeting mitigation requirements as well as dam safety, seepage control and static instability correction were given the maximum funding for efficient and effective execution. Once again, the O&M account appears to have been increased by more than $231,000,000 above the fiscal year 2008 enacted amount. However the administration has again proposed shifting major project rehabilitations and environmental compliance activities associated with completed projects from CG to O&M. Also shifted to O&M are dredged material disposal projects, beach erosion restoration due to completed navigation projects and initial nourishment of beach projects. This shifting of projects was allegedly done in the name of budget transparency--trying to show the true costs of project operations. This seems to be a very weak justification in that the Bureau of Reclamation which has similar projects in their construction accounts still has not received similar guidance in their budget preparation. By shifting some of these projects such as major rehabs and beach nourishments to O&M the administration was able to circumvent their own new start criteria. Further, by funding environmental compliance activities in the individual O&M projects seems to make the budget process less transparent by hiding how much these activities are costing the Nation by distributing these costs across multiple projects as opposed to a single line item in previous budgets. Finally, the administration's budget proposal limits coastal storm damage reduction projects that require periodic sand renourishments to those where the erosion is due to navigation projects. It also proposes to limit Federal participation to initial beach nourishment. Shifting of projects from the two accounts totals almost $265,000,000. This corresponds to a similar decrease in CG funding for fiscal year 2009. If the projects are shifted back to their traditional accounts, the O&M budget is $2,210,225,000. That is over $33,000,000 less than the fiscal year 2008 enacted amount. Further the administration proposed spreading the O&M funding over 28 additional individual projects than what they had proposed in fiscal year 2008. This is the ultimate example of doing more with less. Prices for labor, fuel and materials have all increased over the previous year, not decreased and yet the Corps is expected to do more with less. The Committee notes that the Corps maintenance backlog is more than $1,000,000,000 and increases by about $100,000,000 annually as the inventory of projects ages. After criticism from this Committee concerning the presentation of O&M as 21 separate regions based on watersheds, the administration modified their proposal for fiscal year 2009. The O&M budget is now proposed as 54 separate regions based on sub watersheds as opposed to discrete projects. The discrete projects are still listed for each region, it is just that the administration has not attached any funding levels to any of the projects so this Committee nor any one else would know how much funding might be provided for individual projects. The lack of specificity and detail in a nearly $2,500,000,000 request is appalling and will be discussed in more detail later. The Committee continues to believe this so called ``regional budget' is no more than an aggregation of the projects within a specific watershed not the development of a regional budget. The Committee believes that the Corps should budget regionally and take advantage of whatever efficiencies can be gained by budgeting in this manner. However, it should also be noted that projects are individually analyzed and authorized. Estimates of O&M costs are established as a part of the project development process. If individual O&M estimates are not displayed, there is no way to know if the projects are costing more or less than was anticipated and no way to learn from past errors in developing O&M costs or procedures. The regulatory budget is $180,000,000 for fiscal year 2009. This is the same as in fiscal year 2008. The Committee is disappointed that funding for the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program [FUSRAP] was cut by $10,000,000 from the fiscal year 2008 amount of $140,000,000. This program was transferred to the Corps from the Department of Energy, because the Committee was concerned with management and cost issues of the program within the Energy Department. This is a program that is being well managed by the Corps and should have stable, adequate budget resources to continue these radiological clean-up activities. The Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies account is funded at $40,000,000 for fiscal year 2009. The Committee supports this funding for disaster readiness and preparedness activities of the Corps of Engineers. The budget request separates the budget request for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) from the General Expenses [GE] account. The Committee continues to believe that the Assistant Secretary's office should be funded in the Defense Appropriations bill. However, until such time as that can be reintegrated into that bill, the Committee is grateful to see that the budget request proposes it as a separate account. The Assistant Secretary's duties encompass much more than the civil works functions of the Corps of Engineers and the budget needs of the office should be addressed separately. The Committee is pleased to see an increase in the GE budget for fiscal year 2009. With the increases in responsibilities for the headquarters of the Corps in overseeing larger budgets as well as the massive rebuilding of the flood and storm damage reduction measures in the New Orleans area, it is appropriate that this account should be increased. The Committee notes that the Corps operates one of the most efficient headquarters staffs in the National Capital region. Only about 3.5 percent of their staffing is at their headquarters level as opposed to 10 percent or more for comparable agencies in the National Capital region. The administration has proposed legislation and funding to complete the 100-year protection for the greater New Orleans Hurricane Protection System as a part of the fiscal year 2009 budget request. The administration has proposed to authorize a single hurricane protection project to encompass the Lake Ponchartrain and Vicinity and the West Bank and Vicinity projects along with the other improvements that were authorized and funded in Public Law 109-148 and Public Law 109-234. The Southeast Louisiana projects that provide interior drainage to this system are also proposed to be included. The Budget proposes $5,671,000,000 in emergency funding as a part of the fiscal year 2009 request. The budget proposal also provides legislation to modify the cost sharing for the remaining uncompleted cost shared project features to 65 percent Federal and 35 percent non-Federal. This change results in an increase to the non-Federal interests of $213,000,000 for a total non- Federal share that exceeds $1,500,000,000. The administration says that the Federal funds are needed no later than October 1, 2008 in order to have all of this work completed by the beginning of hurricane season in June 2011. The Congress provided these emergency funds in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, (Public Law 110-252) signed by the President on June 30, 2008. PERFORMANCE BASED BUDGETING The Committee has watched with interest over the last 5 years as the Corps has moved to a ``performance based budget'' model. Unfortunately, the Committee does not see improvement in the budgeting of the Nation's Civil Works infrastructure program as a result of this new model. In fact, the Committee believes quite the opposite is true. Rather than an integrated program, the budget for the Civil Works program seems to continue to degenerate toward a yearly collection of interchangeable projects dependent only on the budgetary whims and criteria in use in that particular year. The current method of performance based budgeting utilized in this budget preparation turns the Nation away from infrastructure investments that return two and even three times their cost. In fiscal year 2005, more than 130 projects were budgeted by the administration for construction; this year there are only about 82. However, Congress funded more than 300 projects in fiscal year 2008 and has averaged about 315 annually since fiscal year 2000. Unfortunately, the budget request pretends that these on-going projects which have been funded annually for many years in enacted legislation do not exist. Further the budget assumes it costs nothing to ignore these projects. If Congress funded only the budget request for Construction, General, the administration would quickly discover that termination costs for unfunded ongoing projects could easily exceed the request. This is irresponsible budgeting on the part of the administration. From the Committee's perspective, the Corps' budget seems to be developed exactly in the opposite manner that it should be. It appears that overall spending targets are set by the administration and then their priority projects are inserted within these targets. Criteria are then established to justify funding the lower priority projects within the remaining funding targets. The problem with budgeting in this manner is evident in the construction account for fiscal year 2009. Six priority projects consume 32 percent of the requested dollars in this account. Another 11 projects related to dam safety consume another 27 percent. That means that some 65 projects have to split the remaining 41 percent of the budgeted construction dollars. The logic behind this budgeting rational appears to be that concentrating scarce resources on finishing a few higher performing projects will allow the Nation to reap the benefits of these projects sooner. The trouble with this is that these are long-term projects that take many years to complete. At the rate the budget is headed, we will only be funding the administration's six priority projects and the dam safety repairs in another couple of years with little else in the pipeline. The Committee questions this rationale when benefits of flood control projects can be accrued incrementally as project elements are completed. Even navigation projects can accrue benefits for a partially completed project. For instance, the administration claims to be providing completion funds for the Columbia River Channel Deepening project. However, the Committee understands that there is a 1 mile segment where additional work will be required once the dredging work is completed to provide full project depth and dimension. The cost of this 1 mile reach has not yet been determined. However, ports and terminals downstream of this reach will benefit from the deeper channel and those national benefits will accrue to the economy. Even the Port of Portland, which is above this reach, believes that with proper tidal conditions, they can reap some benefit from the deeper project until this remaining reach is completed. These are net positive benefits to the national economy compared to the value of the benefits that are deferred by suspending or terminating these other projects in order to concentrate resources on such a few projects. In some cases these deferred benefits may never be realized due to these terminations. Local sponsors who share in these projects' cost may lose their ability to share these costs or may lose public support for finishing these projects. Once these priority projects are completed, one has to wonder whether there will be any projects or sponsors interested in resuming construction in an infrastructure program that suspends projects based on changeable annual criteria. In the past, Corps budgets were developed from the bottom up, District to Division to Headquarters to ASA to OMB. District commanders were responsible for developing and managing a program within their geographic area. Division Commanders were responsible for integrating the District office programs into a single Division-wide program. The Headquarters office integrated the Division Programs into a single national program. The OASA assured that the program complied with administration policy and budgetary guidance and OMB developed the budgetary guidance and provided funding levels. Decisions for budgeting were made within the framework of administration policy by those who knew the projects and programs best, not Washington level bureaucrats. Another benefit of budgeting in this manner is that it allows the Corps to undertake workforce planning to distribute their work across the Nation. When one chooses to concentrate nearly 60 percent of the construction budget in a handful of projects, there is no way the workload can be balanced across the remainder of the Nation with what is left. Unlike other Federal agencies that have a salaries and expense component to their budget, the Corps does not, at least not at the District office level. Virtually all costs at District offices (rent, utilities, labor, materials, et cetera) are charged to projects and studies as directed by Congress. This enables the public to be informed of the true cost of all projects. Accordingly, it is necessary that the budget process be consistent with the accounting practice. When dealing with such large differences in workload from fiscal year to fiscal year it is clear that the administration gave little thought to how this budget would impact the Corps' organizational structure or ability to maintain a technically competent workforce. Congress has repeatedly demonstrated that it desires to keep the structure of the Corps of Engineers as it is currently configured. Yet, if the budget were enacted, there would be no way to maintain this workforce, due to how budgetary criteria skewed the projects to certain areas of the country. Neither a pure ``bottom up'' budget process, nor a performance-based budget process is perfect. Experienced decision makers are expected to exercise informed judgment to achieve a balanced program considering all factors. Once more, the administration appears to have submitted a very unbalanced program using oversimplified decision metrics to consider only a few objectives (for example BCR and efficient completion of a few projects) that do not take into account the long-term needs of the Nation or the organization expected to manage the program. The recently enacted WRDA bill made numerous reforms to Corps of Engineers procedures. However, one change that Congress did not include was changing the BCR necessary for a project to be authorized for construction from the current 1.0 to 1. The budgetary criterion mentioned above requires a BCR to be 3.0 to 1 for full budgeting or a 1.5 to 1 for partial budgeting. This performance based budgeting criteria furthers the divide between what is required for authorization and what is required to be budgeted. These criteria used to be one and the same. Many of the projects in the recently enacted water resources development act do not meet this criteria, increasing the backlog of authorized but unconstructed projects. These new projects, along with the ongoing projects not funded in the budget and the increasing number of major rehabilitations needed for aging infrastructure, are affecting and will continue to affect the national economy. Existing water resources infrastructure is wearing out. The Nation needs to recapitalize if we are to remain competitive in a global marketplace. Infrastructure budgets, starting from the administration level, have got to be increased. If not, the Nation will continue to face unscheduled outages, damaged incomplete infrastructure and other emergency situations that must be dealt with through ever increasing emergency appropriations. FISCAL YEAR 2009 BUDGET INITIATIVES The administration has proposed the same changes to how the civil works program is appropriated for fiscal year 2009 that have been proposed in fiscal year 2008 and fiscal year 2007. These include the regionalization of operations and maintenance funding and migrating four categories of projects from the Construction, General account to the Operations and Maintenance account. The Committee has rejected all of these initiatives. Regionalized operations and maintenance funding segregates funding for projects into 54 watershed regions around the country as opposed to displaying operations and maintenance costs by project as has been the tradition. As projects, not regions, are authorized and funded by Congress, the Committee must reject this proposal. Operation and Maintenance budgets are developed on a project by project basis. For large river basins such as the Ohio or the Missouri, budgeting for the individual projects, as authorized, involve multiple Districts and Divisions. As the proposals in the budget are not developed as a systemized budget, aggregating them in the fashion proposed does not lead to the ``true costs'' of operating the system, it just adds up the various parts. The Committee does not believe that this proposal advances the budgeting for operations and maintenance. The Committee is not opposed to a systemized budget for projects. In fact, in the fiscal year 2008 Energy and Water joint explanatory statement the Congress directed the Corps to prepare systemized, integrated budgets for four regions of the country to demonstrate the value of this approach to the Committee. The budget request did not include these regional budgets. Until the value of a regional budget is demonstrated to the Committee, regional budgeting will not be considered. The Committee rejects the initiative to move Endangered Species Act [ESA] compliance activities from Construction, General to Operations and Maintenance. The stated reason for this change was budget transparency or to more appropriately show the true costs of operating these projects. The Committee has two issues with this logic. Budget transparency fades when the costs are rolled into the regionalized budgets. However, even if they were budgeted on a project by project basis, the casual observer would have no notion of how much of the operational costs of these projects is related to ESA compliance. Second, these are only being considered as operational costs because mitigation for these projects was not undertaken when the projects were constructed as is now required by subsequent laws. Were these projects constructed today, formulation of the projects would have required avoidance and minimization measures for the endangered species as project construction costs. If one wanted to take this argument to the extreme, all of the Everglades Restoration should be budgeted under the Central and South Florida O&M project since construction of this project resulted in the environmental restorations that are now being implemented. However, the costs for this work would not be transparent in the budget. By retaining the ESA compliance measures as separate line items in the CG account, it is much more transparent as to how much is being funded for these activities. The budget has proposed moving major rehabilitation for locks and dams from the Construction, General account to the Operations and Maintenance account. Corresponding to this is a legislative proposal to allow the proceeds from the Inland Waterway Trust Fund to be utilized in the Operations and Maintenance account. Current law only allows these funds to be utilized in the Construction, General account. The Congress moved major rehabilitation from the Construction, General account to the Operation and Maintenance account in fiscal year 1985. Subsequently as the backlog increased, it was returned to the Construction, General account in the fiscal year 1993 budget. The stipulations involved in moving it back to the Construction account included that these major rehabilitations would involve more than a simple restoration of project function. Operational improvements were considered as a part of the rehab. As such, the rehabilitated, or recapitalized, projects were considered new investment opportunities for the country, the same as other new projects, and had to compete as new starts in the Construction, General program. This is entirely appropriate as these recapitalized projects provide increased levels of service and performance not envisioned in their original construction. If they didn't, under existing administration policy, the repairs would be considered major maintenance and would be funded under the Operation and Maintenance account. To help fund these major rehabs, legislation allowed half the costs of the major rehab to be borne by the Inland Waterway Trust Fund with the other half to come from the General Treasury. The Committee does not believe moving these projects back to the Operations and Maintenance account will solve the backlog of major rehabs and rejects this proposal. The Committee believes that the real intent of this proposal is to skirt the new start issue in the CG account. The Corps has proposed initiating a major rehab report for the Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. By including this in O&M they don't have to consider this as a new start under their own budgeting criterion. The Committee is disappointed that the administration has recycled their beach policy from the fiscal year 2008 budget. This proposal was rejected by the Congress. The authorizing committees that prepared the recently enacted Water Resources Development Act chose to reject this policy as well. The Committee rejects the policy again this year. The Committee notes that beaches are the leading tourist destination in the United States and that about 50 percent of our population lives near our Nation's coasts. Typically shore protection projects are justified on storm damages prevented alone, and the recreation benefits only enhance the benefit to cost ratio. Shore protection projects should be viewed in the same manner as levees along our rivers. These projects mitigate storm damage in the same fashion that levees mitigate riverine flooding. The maximum Federal Government contribution to Federal shore protection projects is 65 percent of the total project cost but the Government receives all the benefits in reducing Federal disaster assistance payments. Like much of our other infrastructure, by paying for Federal shore protection projects now, we can avoid many of the catastrophic losses and disaster assistance payments associated with hurricanes and coastal storms. Simply stated, the Nation can pay now to avoid losses or pay more later to recover from severe impacts. It truly makes sense to be proactive and not reactive in this environment. The Committee believes that this budget proposal is no way to run a robust national infrastructure program. The Committee recommended that the Corps include additional criteria into the project prioritization process and commends the administration for having done so for the fiscal year 2009 budget request. However, the net result is that the mix of projects is substantially unchanged. The Committee does not believe that this prioritization method can be salvaged into a useable system. Further, the Committee has seen no evidence that it has improved the budget process. Rather than trying new budget models and new prioritization criteria, the country needs to invest more heavily in its water resources. Water resource projects are some of the only Federal expenditures that go through a rigorous benefit to cost process to determine benefits to the national economy. The standard of living that we currently enjoy is due to the excess capacity that was built into our water resources infrastructure by previous generations. By failing to make new investments and recapitalizing aging infrastructure, the Nation is not only falling behind our competition around the world, but is jeopardizing our future economic growth. BUDGET JUSTIFICATIONS The Committee commends the Corps for the layout of the budget justifications for fiscal year 2009. Grouping projects by the Division office rather than according to business lines makes the justifications much more useful to the Committee and provides more easily accessible information to the public. The Committee expects that this method of displaying the budget justifications will be continued for the fiscal year 2010 budget. The Committee finds the justifications for O&M projects to be totally inadequate. Inadequate is an understatement, there were no justifications provided for O&M. The only information provided was the business line totals for each region. How the information was established to justify these totals is a mystery in the justification statements. When the Committee staff initially inquired about information for the individual projects that made up the funded regions, they were told that OMB had directed that information concerning individual projects was not to be released. Fortunately OMB relented on this point and allowed the Corps to provide this information. For a $2,500,000,000 account this is an unacceptable manner to justify a budget. More information was provided for the $40,000,000 in studies in the GI account than was provided for all of O&M. The Committee is also disappointed in the justifications for the Continuing Authorities Program and the Dam Safety/ Seepage Stability Correction Program. The justifications for these items showed a total dollar value and listed projects, but give the Committee no idea how the program totals were arrived at. There is no way to know whether the administration proposal underfunds or overfunds these programs. The Committee believes that budget justifications serve to justify the administration's request. The budget justifications could be improved by providing more relevant budget and project information. For fiscal year 2010 the Corps is directed to provide, at a minimum, detailed project information for each O&M project justifying the needs for each project. If the administration chooses to continue to provide the business line information, it may be provided as a separate appendix to the justifications. INLAND WATERWAY TRUST FUND When the fiscal year 2008 budget was presented to Congress, the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) notified the committee of a looming deficit in the Inland Waterway Trust Fund [IWTF] due to the amount of work that was being funded on the inland waterway system. He stated that legislation would be forthcoming from the administration to address this expected shortfall. The Congress never received a proposal in calendar year 2007. Even though the Environment and Public Works Committee was working on a WRDA bill, and the WRDA could have been the appropriate vehicle for the legislation, no legislation was forthcoming. When the fiscal year 2009 budget was presented to Congress, the budget announced a proposal to phase out the existing fuel tax that funds the IWTF and phase in a lockage fee. It also announced that a legislative proposal would be forthcoming. The legislative proposal was finally submitted to Congress on April 4, 2008. Six months before the beginning of the new fiscal year. The administration's budget for fiscal year 2009 was predicated on this significant change in law being enacted by October 1, 2008. More funding was proposed to be utilized from the IWTF than was estimated to be available utilizing the current revenue source. The only way to fund the administration's budget request for IWTF projects, as they had been cost shared, was through a change in law. The Committee has supported and continues to support sharing the cost of construction and major rehabilitations between the IWTF and the General Treasury in the Construction, General account. The Committee believes that this arrangement makes the users active partners in the overall inland waterway system and provides for a better more efficient system. As the Congress already pays 100 percent of the O&M costs of the inland waterway system, the Committee would not support a change in cost sharing for the IWTF. Even if it did support a cost share change, this would only prolong the inevitable bankrupting of the IWTF. The current fuel tax generates about $90,000,000 annually. Currently awarded continuing contracts for IWTF projects will require approximately $60,000,000 of this amount for the next 4 years. The administration has proposed and the Committee has been appropriating considerably more than that amount from the fund over the last several years. Therefore, the Committee believes that the only way to solve the problem is to generate additional revenues in the fund. The current fuel tax is spread relatively equitably across all commercial users of the inland waterway system. However, the fuel tax has remained at $0.20 per gallon of diesel fuel since 1996. Inflation and increased efficiency in tow boats has eroded the value of the fuel tax. One potential solution is to index the fuel tax to inflation. Another solution would be to keep the current fuel tax in place but to add a lock user fee to the revenue stream. This way, all users would pay something and those that use the locks would pay more. A wholesale change from a fuel tax to a user fee as proposed by the administration appears to be unacceptable to Congress or the inland waterway industry. However, the Committee only proffers these as discussion topics. The one problem the Committee sees with a user fee is that it could deter use of waterways. As waterways are the most efficient mode of transport any solution to the funding shortfall should not provide disincentives for using the inland waterways. To fund the administration request for fiscal year 2009 would require approximately $117,000,000 in IWTF revenues. The Corps has informed the Committee that there will not be that much available in fiscal year 2009. The Corps has also informed the Committee that in order to keep from exceeding available revenues that they have not awarded a planned contract in fiscal year 2008 that would have requirements in fiscal year 2009 for the Lock and Dams 2, 3, and 4 on the Monongahela River. To address the funding shortfall in the IWTF the Committee is taking the unusual step of directing in legislative text that only nine inland waterway projects will have access to IWTF revenues in fiscal year 2009 in order to assure that planned work does not exceed revenues. The Corps is directed in fiscal year 2009 to utilize the general fund of the U.S. Treasury to fund inland waterway projects without specific statutory requirements to be funded from the IWTF. The Committee intends this to be a single year change. Fiscal year 2009 inland waterway projects funded entirely with General Fund revenues should be brought to a logical stopping point and deferred until such time as the IWTF revenue stream is enhanced and these projects can again be cost shared with the IWTF. Legislative text is also being included to prohibit the Corps from entering into any new continuing contracts for any inland waterway project until the revenue stream for the IWTF is enhanced. The administration should submit the fiscal year 2010 budget based on expected revenues in the IWTF not based on projections based on legislation that may or may not happen. If the budget is submitted utilizing the same assumptions on the IWTF that the administration made this year, the Committee will have no choice but to curtail spending on all inland waterway projects in fiscal year 2010 to a level that fits within the IWTF estimated revenues. No change in law has been made nor will this Committee propose any to alleviate the funding problem that will occur in fiscal year 2009. That means the Committee cannot fund the administration's request as proposed. CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING The budget for the Corps of Engineers consists of individual line items of projects. As presented by the President, the budget contains 151 specific line item requests for funding. As was previously discussed the O&M request proposed expending funds in an additional 54 line items listed as watershed basins or subbasins. However, once the detail was received from the administration concerning O&M, the O&M funding was spread across 820 specific line items. This totals 971 specific line item requests for directed spending by the administration. Additional funding is requested by the administration for nationwide line items. The administration does not consider anything that the administration requests as an earmark. Yet all of these line items were specific requests by the administration of the Congress to be funded in fiscal year 2009. They did not request these funds programmatically, they requested them for a specific project in a specific location for a specific purpose. The President published an Executive Order [EO] on January 29, 2008, that directs his agency heads to ignore congressionally directed spending items that are contained in the explanatory reports that accompany legislative text and states that an ``earmark'' is any funding requested by Congress that circumvents a merit based or competitive allocation process. The EO does not define what a merit based or competitive allocation process is, but one can assume that it will be how the administration chooses to define it and projects added by Congress will not be considered. The Committee has traditionally included funding for the Corps of Engineers by account in legislative text and provided the details for each account within the report that accompanies the legislation. This was primarily done to provide the agency some flexibility in how funds were expended and to allow the Corps to effectively manage their program while honoring the intent of Congress. The primary intent of Congress has always been that once the Congress funded a study, it intended for the study phase to be completed to determine if Federal investment is warranted. By the same token, once the Congress committed to initiation of construction of a project, it intended for the project to be completed and the national economy to accrue the project benefits. With this Executive Order in place, the Committee is concerned that this intent might not be followed. There appears to be little desire for discussion of what exactly is meant in this Executive Order, so the Committee has executed its constitutional prerogatives by including statutory language to incorporate by reference all of the details of each account from the report that accompanies the legislative text, into the actual legislative text. This will ensure that the intent of Congress is fully complied with. CONTINUING CONTRACTS AND REPROGRAMMING The Committee expects the Chief of Engineers to execute the Civil Works program generally in accordance with congressional direction. This includes moving individual projects forward in accordance with the funds annually appropriated. However, the Committee realizes that many factors outside the Corps' control may dictate the progress of any given project or study. Because the individual projects are being incorporated into the legislative text the Corps is cautioned that while the Committee is firmly in favor of utilizing continuing contracts for the Civil Works program, it may be difficult to award this type of contract under these constraints. Because of the Committee's concern that congressional intent be followed, reprogramming authority has been withdrawn from all but the O&M account and the O&M portion of the Mississippi River and Tributaries project. Reprogramming authority is as follows: Operations and Maintenance.--Unlimited reprogramming authority is granted in order for the Corps to be able to respond to emergency situations. The Chief of Engineers must notify the House and Senate Appropriations Committees of these emergency actions as soon thereafter as practicable. For all other situations, for a base less than $1,000,000, the reprogramming limit is $150,000. For a base over $1,000,000, 15 percent up to a limit of $5,000,000 per project or activity. Amounts over this limit require approval of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. The Committee does not object reprogramming up to $150,000 to any continuing project or program that did not receive an appropriation in the current year. Mississippi River and Tributaries.--The Corps should follow the same reprogramming guidelines for the Operation and Maintenance portions of the Mississippi River and Tributaries account as listed above. 5-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE BUDGET PLANNING While the Committee appreciates the Corps' attempts to provide a meaningful 5-year budget plan, it recognizes the inherent difficulties between the legislative and executive branches in preparing a useful plan. The executive branch is unwilling to project a 5-year horizon for projects for which they do not budget leaving a sizeable percentage of the Corps annual appropriations with a year to year event horizon for planning purposes. The fact that a sizeable portion of the annual appropriations are dedicated to congressional priorities is not a new phenomenon. Many major public works projects over the last two centuries have been funded on an annual basis without a clear budget strategy. The Committee would welcome the ideas and the opportunity to work with the executive branch to determine a mutually agreeable way to develop an integrated 5-year comprehensive budget that displays true funding needs for congressional as well as administration priorities. Anything less will only give a partial view of the investments needed in water resources infrastructure. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The Committee recommendation includes a total of $5,300,000,000. This is $559,000,000 over the administration's budget request and $287,087,000 less than the fiscal year 2008 enacted amount. This table excludes the request for emergency appropriations for the New Orleans hurricane protection system as requested in the budget since it has been funded through an emergency supplemental appropriations act. Funding is displayed in the following tables in the accounts where projects have been traditionally located and comparisons to the budget request are made as if the request was presented in the traditional manner. Funding by account is as follows: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fiscal year 2009 Commettee Request vs. request recommendation recommendation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- General Investigations.................................... $91,000 $166,000 +$75,000 Construction, General..................................... 1,666,775 2,004,500 +337,225 Mississippi River and Tributaries......................... 240,000 365,000 +125,000 Operation and Maintenance................................. 2,210,225 2,220,000 +9,775 Regulatory................................................ 180,000 183,000 +3,000 Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies..................... 40,000 40,000 ................ Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program........... 130,000 140,000 +10,000 Office of the Assistant Secretary of the.................. ................ ................ ................ Army (Civil Works)........................................ 6,000 4,500 -1,500 General Expenses.......................................... 177,000 177,000 ................ ----------------------------------------------------- Total............................................... 4,741,000 5,300,000 +559,000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW STARTS The passage of the WRDA bill in 2007 presented the Committee with the challenge of 7 years of pent up demand for new studies and projects. The Committee had to balance the funding needs of ongoing work with the future ability to fund potential new start studies and projects. Ultimately the Committee decided to fund a very limited number of new studies and projects. The Committee's essential criterion for deciding new starts was to ensure that the projects or studies were only for traditional Corps missions. Therefore the Committee excluded from consideration: (1) New environmental infrastructure authorizations; (2) Non traditional project authorizations; (3) Authorizations that have not been through the traditional two phase planning process; (4) New projects under section 206 and section 1135 of the Continuing Authorities Program as these program sections are oversubscribed; (5) Projects that included demonstration features; (6) New projects that would require funds from the Inland Waterway Trust Fund because of lack of funding in the IWTF. DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS The Committee received more than 3,000 requests for projects, programs, studies or activities for the Corps of Engineers for fiscal year 2009. These requests included the budget request as well as requests by Members. The Committee obviously was unable to accommodate all of these requests. In the interest of providing full disclosure of funding provided in the Energy and Water bill, all disclosures are made in the report accompanying the bill. All of the projects funded in this report have gone through the same rigorous public review and approval process as those proposed for funding by the President. The difference in these projects, of course, is that the congressionally directed projects are not subject to the artificial budgetary prioritization criteria that the administration utilizes to decide what not to fund. For those programs, projects, or studies that were included in the budgetary documents provided in the budget request, the words ``The President'' has been added to denote this administration request. The level of funding provided for each of these programs, projects or studies should not be construed as what was requested. Rather, the only intent is to disclose the requestor. It should be noted that many line items only have the President listed as the requestor. It should not be inferred that the affected Members are not interested in these projects studies or activities. Rather this is due to Committee direction that it is unnecessary to request the President's budget as the individual administration requests are the basis of the Senate bill. The purposes for the funding provided in the various accounts is described in the paragraphs associated with each account. The location of the programs, projects or studies are denoted in the account tables. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Appropriations, 2008.................................... $167,261,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 91,000,000 Committee recommendation................................ 166,000,000 This appropriation funds studies to determine the need, engineering feasibility, economic justification, and the environmental and social suitability of solutions to water and related land resource problems; and for preconstruction engineering and design work, data collection, and interagency coordination and research activities. The planning program is the entry point for Federal involvement in solutions to the Nation's water resource problems and needs. Unfortunately, the General Investigations [GI] account is eviscerated in the budget request. Nationwide studies and programs consume over half of the administration's GI request. This budget is saying that the Nation should concentrate scarce resources on completing studies but not carrying forward ongoing studies or allowing new starts. The Committee continues to believe this argument is remarkably shortsighted. It assumes that the country will stop growing and that new investment opportunities will not be present. In truth, as the country grows, new investment opportunities will be presented and some previously authorized projects may no longer make sense or may be less competitive. The Corps should keep presenting the administration and Congress with new investment opportunities in order for the Nation to remain competitive in a global economy. The only conclusion one can draw from the administration's GI proposal is that they are determined to redirect the Corps toward construction, operation and maintenance by strangling their ability to evaluate water resource problems and needs. The Committee has provided for a robust and balanced planning program for fiscal year 2009. The Committee has used the traditional view within the Corps planning program that only considers new starts as those that have never received GI funds before. The Committee believes that to maintain a robust planning program, a mix of new reconnaissance studies must be included with the existing feasibility and PED studies. As such the Committee has included a few new reconnaissance studies in this account. To provide additional transparency in the budget process, the Committee has segregated the budget into three columns in the following table. The first column represents the reconnaissance phase of the planning process. These studies determine if there is a Federal interest in a water resource problem or need and if there is a cost sharing sponsor willing to move forward with the study. The next column represents the feasibility phase of the study. These detailed cost shared studies determine the selected alternative to be recommended to the Congress for construction. The third column represents the Preconstruction engineering and design phase. These detailed cost shared designs are prepared while the project recommended to Congress is awaiting authorization for construction. The Committee believes that by segregating the table in this manner that more attention will be focused on the various study phases, and a more balanced planning program will be developed by the administration. As the last two columns are generally cost shared, they demonstrate the commitment by cost sharing sponsors to be a part of the Federal planning process. By the same token, it also shows the level of commitment of the Federal Government to these cost sharing sponsors. The Committee directs that the fiscal year 2010 planning budget be presented to the Committee in this fashion. The budget request and the recommended Committee allowance are shown on the following table: CORPS OF ENGINEERS--GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS [In thousands of dollars] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Budget estimate Committee recommendation Project title ------------------------------------------------------------ Investigations Planning RECON FEAS PED ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ALASKA ANCHORAGE HARBOR DEEPENING, AK..................... 100 ......... ......... 100 400 BARROW COASTAL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION, AK.......... 400 ......... ......... 400 ......... HOMER HARBOR MODIFICATION, AK...................... .............. ......... ......... 400 ......... KENAI RIVER BLUFF EROSION, AK...................... .............. ......... ......... 500 ......... MATANUSKA RIVER WATERSHED, AK...................... .............. ......... ......... 400 ......... VALDEZ HARBOR EXPANSION, AK........................ .............. ......... ......... 150 ......... YAKUTAT HARBOR, AK................................. 700 ......... ......... 700 ......... ARIZONA AGUA FRIA RIVER TRILBY WASH, AZ.................... .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... LITTLE COLORADO RIVER WATERSHED, AZ................ .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... PIMA COUNTY, AZ.................................... 275 ......... ......... 275 ......... VA SHLY-AY AKIMEL SALT RIVER RESTORATION, AZ....... .............. 658 ......... .......... 658 ARKANSAS LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESOURCE STUDY, AR......... .............. ......... 254 .......... ......... MAY BRANCH, FORT SMITH, AR......................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 250 PINE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR............................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 500 SOUTHWEST, ARKANSAS, AR............................ .............. ......... ......... 327 ......... WHITE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, AR & MO........... .............. ......... ......... 500 ......... WHITE RIVER NAVIGATION TO BATESVILLE, AR........... .............. ......... ......... .......... 325 CALIFORNIA BOLINAS LAGOON ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA........... .............. ......... ......... 350 ......... CALIFORNIA COASTAL SEDIMENT MASTER PLAN, CA........ 900 ......... ......... 900 ......... CARPINTERIA SHORELINE STUDY........................ .............. ......... ......... 443 ......... COYOTE & BERRYESSA CREEKS, CA...................... .............. 950 ......... .......... 950 COYOTE DAM, CA..................................... .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... GOLETA BEACH, CA................................... .............. ......... ......... 150 ......... HAMILTON CITY, CA.................................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 500 HEACOCK AND CACTUS CHANNELS, CA.................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 500 HUMBOLDT BAY LONG TERM SHOAL MGMT, CA.............. .............. ......... ......... 200 ......... LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY, WOODLAND AND .............. ......... ......... 200 ......... VICINITY.......................................... LOS ANGELES RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA........ .............. ......... ......... 590 ......... LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA............................ .............. ......... ......... 400 ......... MALIBU CREEK WATERSHED, CA......................... .............. ......... ......... 150 ......... MATILIJA DAM, CA................................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 1,000 MIDDLE CREEK, CA................................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 500 PAJARO RIVER, CA................................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 1,000 REDWOOD CITY HARBOR, CA............................ .............. ......... ......... 300 ......... RIVERSIDE COUNTY SAMP, CA.......................... .............. ......... ......... 200 ......... ROCK CREEK, KEEFER SLOUGH, CA...................... .............. ......... ......... 200 ......... SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN COMP, CA.................... .............. ......... ......... 1,000 ......... SAC--SAN JOAQUIN DELTA ISLANDS AND LEVEES, CA...... 468 ......... ......... 2,000 ......... SAN DIEGO COUNTY SAMP, CA.......................... .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHORELINE, CA..................... .............. ......... ......... 200 ......... SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN (SJRB), FRAZIER CREEK/ .............. ......... ......... 200 ......... STRATHMO.......................................... SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, WEST STANISLAUS, ORESTIMBA .............. ......... ......... 400 ......... CR................................................ SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, LOWER SAN JAOQUIN RIVER, .............. ......... ......... 600 ......... CA................................................ SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN (SJRB), WHITE RIVER/DRY .............. ......... ......... 125 ......... CREEK............................................. SAN PABLO BAY WATERSHED, CA........................ .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... SOLANA-ENCINITAS SHORELINE, CA..................... 171 ......... ......... 171 ......... SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SHORELINE, CA.................. .............. ......... ......... 1,400 ......... SUTTER COUNTY, CA.................................. 339 ......... ......... 339 ......... TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING, CA AND NV................. .............. ......... ......... 125 ......... UPPER PENITENCIA CREEK, CA......................... 191 ......... ......... 191 ......... COLORADO BASALT, CO......................................... .............. ......... 50 .......... ......... CACHE LA POUDRE, CO................................ .............. ......... ......... 5 125 CHATFIELD, CHERRY AND BEAR CREEK, RESERVOIRS, CO... .............. ......... ......... 200 ......... SOUTH BOULDER CREEK, CO............................ .............. ......... 2 250 ......... CONNECTICUT CONNECTICUT RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CT, MA, NH .............. ......... ......... 450 ......... & VT.............................................. DELAWARE RED CLAY CREEK, CHRISTINA RIVER WATERSHED, DE...... .............. ......... ......... 300 ......... FLORIDA FLAGER COUNTY, FL.................................. .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... LAKE WORTH INLET, FL............................... .............. ......... ......... 200 ......... MILE POINT, FL..................................... 50 ......... ......... 50 ......... PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL......................... 550 ......... ......... 550 ......... SARASOTA, LIDO KEY, FL............................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 158 ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL............................... .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... WALTON COUNTY, FL.................................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 591 GEORGIA AUGUSTA, GA........................................ .............. 278 ......... .......... 278 LONG ISLAND, MARSH AND JOHNS CREEKS, GA............ 150 ......... ......... 150 ......... SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA...................... .............. 700 ......... .......... 700 TYBEE ISLAND, GA................................... 250 ......... ......... 250 ......... GUAM HAGATNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, GUAM.................. 350 ......... ......... 350 ......... HAWAII ALA WAI CANAL, OAHU, HI............................ 300 ......... ......... 300 ......... HILO HARBOR MODIFICATIONS, HI...................... .............. ......... 100 .......... ......... HYDROELECTRIC POWER ASSESSMENT, HI................. .............. ......... 300 .......... ......... KAHUKU, HI......................................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 344 KALAELOA BARBERS POINT HARBOR MODIFICATION, HI..... .............. ......... ......... 350 ......... MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HI........................... .............. 200 ......... 200 ......... WAILUPE STREAM, OAHU, HI........................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 300 ILLINOIS DES PLAINES RIVER, IL (PHASE II)................... 500 ......... ......... 500 ......... ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION, IL............... 400 ......... ......... 400 ......... INTERBASIN CONTROL OF GREAT LAKES--MISSISSIPPI .............. ......... ......... 300 ......... RIVER AQ NUISANCE SPECIES, IL, IN, OH, WI......... KEITH CREEK, ROCKFORD, IL.......................... .............. ......... ......... 548 ......... PEORIA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, IL.................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 50 PRAIRIE DUPONT LEVEE, IL........................... .............. ......... ......... 200 ......... S. FORK, SOUTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, (BUBBLY .............. ......... ......... 400 ......... CREEK)............................................ UPPER MISS--ILLINOIS WW SYSTEM, IL, IA, MN, MO & .............. ......... ......... 10,000 ......... WI................................................ UPPER MISS RVR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IL, IA, MO, MN & .............. ......... 220 .......... ......... WI................................................ INDIANA INDIANA HARBOR, IN................................. 300 ......... ......... 300 ......... IOWA CEDAR RIVER TIME CHECK AREA, IA.................... .............. ......... ......... 300 ......... HUMBOLT, IA........................................ .............. ......... 2 150 ......... KANSAS MANHATTAN, KS...................................... .............. ......... ......... 300 ......... TOPEKA, KS......................................... .............. 100 ......... .......... 100 UPPER TURKEY CREEK, KS............................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 150 LOUISIANA AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... LA................................................ BAYOU SORREL LOCK, LA.............................. .............. 1,599 ......... .......... 1,599 BOSSIER PARISH, LA................................. .............. ......... ......... 200 ......... CALCASIEU LOCK, LA................................. 53 ......... ......... 600 ......... CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA....................... .............. ......... ......... 162 ......... CALCASIEU RIVER BASIN, LA.......................... 67 ......... ......... 67 ......... CROSS LAKE, LA..................................... .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM REST, LA (SCIENCE 10,000 ......... ......... .......... ......... PRO............................................... LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA... 10,000 ......... ......... 10,000 ......... PORT OF IBERIA, LA................................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 1,000 ST. CHARLES PARISH URBAN FLOOD CONTROL, LA......... 500 ......... ......... 500 ......... ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST URBAN FLOOD CONTROL, LA....... .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... SOUTHWEST COASTAL LOUISIANA HURRICANE PROTECTION, .............. ......... ......... 1,500 ......... LA................................................ WEST SHORE, LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA................. .............. ......... ......... 900 ......... MAINE SEARSPORT HARBOR, ME............................... .............. ......... ......... 157 ......... MARYLAND ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES COMP PLAN, MD...... .............. ......... ......... 400 ......... BALTIMORE METRO WATER RESOURCES--PATAPSCO URBAN .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... RIVER............................................. CHESAPEAKE BAY MARSHLANDS, MD...................... .............. ......... ......... 1,000 ......... CHESAPEAKE BAY SHORELINE, MARYLAND COASTAL .............. ......... ......... 200 ......... MANAGEMENT........................................ CHESAPEAKE BAY SUSQUEHANNA RESERVOIR SEDIMENT .............. ......... 100 100 ......... MANAGEMENT........................................ EASTERN SHORE, MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND, MD....... .............. ......... ......... .......... 983 LOWER POTOMAC ESTUARY WATERSHED, ST. MARY'S, MD.... .............. ......... ......... .......... 150 MIDDLE POTOMAC COMP PLAN, MD, VA, PA, WV, DC....... .............. ......... ......... 175 ......... MIDDLE POTOMAC WATERSHED, GREAT SENECA CREEK, AND .............. ......... ......... 300 ......... MUDDY............................................. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN LOW FLOW MANAGEMENT AND .............. ......... ......... 300 ......... ENVIRO............................................ MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON HARBOR (45-FOOT CHANNEL), MA................ .............. 2,300 ......... .......... 2,300 PILGRIM LAKE, TRURO & PROVINCETOWN, MA............. 96 ......... ......... 96 ......... MICHIGAN GREAT LAKES NAV SYST STUDY, MI, IL, IN, MN, NY, OH, 200 ......... 200 .......... ......... PA............................................... GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS (RAP), MI........ .............. ......... ......... 1,000 ......... LANSING, GRAND RIVER WATERFRONT RESTORATION, MI.... .............. ......... 50 .......... ......... ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI................................ .............. ......... ......... 200 ......... MINNESOTA MARSH LAKE, MN (MN RIVER AUTHORITY)................ .............. ......... ......... 227 ......... MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED, MN...................... .............. ......... ......... 350 ......... MINNESOTA RIVER BASIN, MN & SD..................... .............. ......... ......... 350 ......... WILD RICE RIVER, RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, MN.. 271 ......... ......... 271 ......... MISSISSIPPI PEARL RIVER WATERSHED, MS.......................... .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... MISSOURI BRUSH CREEK BASIN, KS & MO......................... .............. ......... ......... 274 ......... KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS.............................. 262 ......... ......... 315 ......... MISSOURI RIVER DEGRADATION, MO..................... 88 ......... ......... 588 ......... MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, UNITS L45 & R460-471, .............. ......... ......... .......... 300 MO................................................ RIVER DES PERES, MO................................ .............. ......... ......... 150 ......... SWOPE PARK, KANSAS CITY, MO........................ .............. 138 ......... .......... ......... MONTANA YELLOWSTONE RIVER CORRIDOR, MT..................... 200 ......... ......... 500 ......... NEBRASKA LOWER PLATTE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NE............. .............. ......... ......... 177 ......... NEW HAMPSHIRE MERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, NH & MA........... 200 ......... ......... 200 ......... PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER, HN & ME... .............. ......... ......... 82 ......... NEW JERSEY DELAWARE RIVER COMPREHENSIVE, NJ................... 290 ......... ......... 290 ......... HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ 204 ......... ......... 204 ......... HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, LOWER PASSAIC RIVER, NJ... 200 ......... ......... 500 ......... LOWER SADDLE RIVER, BERGEN COUNTY, NJ.............. .............. ......... ......... .......... 375 NEW JERSEY SHORE PROTECTION, HEREFORD TO CAPE MAY .............. ......... ......... 4 150 INLET............................................. NEW JERSEY SHORELINE ALTERNATIVE LONG-TERM .............. ......... ......... 150 ......... NOURISHMENT....................................... PASSAIC RIVER MAIN STEM, NJ........................ .............. ......... ......... .......... 250 PASSAIC RIVER, HARRISON, NJ........................ .............. ......... ......... .......... 297 PECKMAN RIVER BASIN, NJ............................ .............. ......... ......... 375 ......... RAHWAY RIVER BASIN, NJ............................. .............. ......... ......... 300 ......... RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, HIGHLANDS, NJ...... .............. ......... ......... 300 ......... RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, LEONARDO, NJ....... .............. ......... ......... .......... 100 RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, UNION BEACH, NJ.... .............. ......... ......... .......... 100 SHREWSBURY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 250 SOUTH RIVER, RARITAN RIVER BASIN, NJ............... .............. ......... ......... .......... 375 STONY BROOK, MILLSTONE RIVER BASIN, NJ............. .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... NEW MEXICO ESPANOLA VALLEY RIO GRANDE AND TRIBS, NM........... .............. ......... ......... 400 ......... RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM, CO & TX...................... .............. ......... ......... 500 ......... SANTA FE, NM....................................... .............. ......... ......... 28 ......... NEW YORK BUFFALO RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, NY........... 100 ......... ......... 100 ......... FORGE RIVER WATERSHED, LONG ISLAND, NY............. .............. ......... ......... 125 ......... HASHAMOMUCK COVE, SOUTHOLD, NY..................... .............. ......... ......... 125 ......... HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, NY & NJ................... 200 ......... ......... 200 ......... LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY............................ .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... MONTAUK POINT, NY.................................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 375 NORTH SHORE OF LONG ISLAND, ASHAROKEN, NY.......... .............. ......... ......... 150 ......... NORTH SHORE LONG ISLAND, BAYVILLE, NY.............. .............. ......... ......... 175 ......... SAW MILL RIVER WATERSHED, NY....................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 250 SOUTH SHORE OF STATEN ISLAND, NY................... .............. ......... ......... 200 ......... TEN MILE RIVER WATERSHED, DUTCHESS CTY, NY & .............. ......... ......... 125 ......... LITCHFIEL......................................... WESTCHESTER COUNTY STREAMS, NY..................... .............. ......... ......... 175 ......... UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, NY................. .............. ......... ......... 300 ......... NEVADA TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV................................ .............. ......... ......... .......... 5,000 NORTH CAROLINA BOGUE BANKS, NC.................................... .............. ......... ......... 132 ......... CURRITUCK SOUND, NC................................ 150 ......... ......... 150 ......... NEUSE RIVER BASIN, NC.............................. .............. 200 ......... .......... 200 NORTH CAROLINA INTERNATIONAL PORT, NC.............. .............. ......... 100 .......... ......... SURF CITY AND NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, NC.............. .............. ......... ......... 386 ......... NORTH DAKOTA MISSOURI RIVER, ND, MT, SD, NE, IA, KS, MO......... .............. ......... ......... 3,000 ......... RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, MN, ND, SD & .............. ......... ......... 500 ......... MANITOBA, CANADA.................................. OHIO BELPRE, OH......................................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 150 CUYAHOGA RIVER BULKHEAD STUDY, OH.................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 126 HOCKING RIVER BASIN, MONDAY CREEK, OH.............. .............. ......... ......... .......... 300 MAHONING RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OH.......... .............. ......... ......... .......... 500 WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, BLANCHARD RIVER WATERSHED, .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... OH................................................ WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OH, IN, & MI.............. .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... OKLAHOMA GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN WATERSHED, OK, MO, KS & .............. ......... ......... 60 ......... AR................................................ GRAND LAKE COMPREHENSIVE, OK....................... .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... SOUTHEAST OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCE STUDY, OK........ .............. ......... ......... 500 ......... WASHITA RIVER BASIN, OK............................ .............. ......... ......... 250 ......... OREGON AMAZON CREEK, OR................................... .............. ......... ......... 350 ......... WALLA WALLA RIVER WATERSHED, OR & WA............... .............. ......... ......... .......... 500 WILLAMETTE RIVER FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION, OR........ 240 ......... ......... 240 ......... PENNSYLVANIA BLOOMSBURG, PA..................................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 700 DELAWARE RIVER DREDGED MATERIAL UTILIZATION, PA, .............. ......... 125 .......... ......... DE, &............................................. UPPER OHIO NAVIGATION STUDY, PA.................... .............. ......... ......... 4,200 ......... SOUTH CAROLINA EDISTO ISLAND, SC.................................. 218 ......... ......... 218 ......... SOUTH DAKOTA JAMES RIVER, SD & ND............................... .............. ......... ......... 350 ......... WATERTOWN AND VICINITY, SD......................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 450 TENNESSE MILL CREEK WATERSHED, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN.......... 100 ......... ......... 100 ......... TEXAS ABILENE, TX........................................ .............. ......... ......... 150 ......... BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, BROWNSVILLE CHANNEL, TX...... 400 ......... ......... 400 ......... CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX.................... .............. 150 ......... .......... ......... DALLAS FLOODWAY, UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX..... .............. 207 ......... .......... 1,000 FREEPORT HARBOR, TX................................ 400 ......... ......... 400 ......... GIWW, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER REALIGNMENTS, TX 200 ......... ......... 200 ......... GIWW, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER, TX.............. .............. 150 ......... .......... 150 GIWW, PORT OCONNOR TO CORPUS CHRISTI BAY, TX....... 350 ......... ......... 350 ......... GUADALUPE AND SAN ANTONIO RIVER BASINS, TX......... 223 ......... ......... 223 ......... LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN, TX..................... 425 ......... ......... 425 ......... NUECES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX................... 250 ......... ......... 650 ......... RAYMONDVILLE DRAIN, TX............................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 350 RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX............................... 100 ......... ......... 100 ......... SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX......................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 500 SABINE PASS TO GALVESTON BAY, TX................... .............. ......... ......... 400 ......... SPARKS ARROYO COLONIA, EL PASO COUNTY, TX.......... .............. ......... ......... 150 ......... VERMONT MONTPELIER, VT.................................... .............. ......... ......... 750 ......... VIRGINIA AIWW BRIDGE AT DEEP CREEK, VA...................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 500 CLINCH RIVER WATERSHED, VA......................... .............. ......... ......... 150 ......... DISMAL SWAMP AND DISMAL SWAMP CANAL, VA............ .............. ......... ......... 262 ......... ELIZABETH RIVER, HAMPTON ROADS, VA................. .............. 97 ......... .......... 97 FOUR MILE RUN, VA.................................. .............. ......... ......... 300 ......... JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & NC (SECTION 300 ......... ......... 300 ......... 216).............................................. LYNNHAVEN RIVER BASIN, VA.......................... 175 ......... ......... 175 ......... NEW RIVER, CLAYTOR LAKE, VA........................ .............. ......... ......... .......... 150 UPPER RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER, VA (PHASE II)............ .............. ......... ......... 200 ......... VICINITY AND WILLOUGHBY SPIT, VA................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 200 WASHINGTON CENTRALIA, WA...................................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 1,200 CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN, WA........................... .............. ......... ......... 1,000 ......... ELLIOTT BAY SEAWALL, WA............................ .............. ......... ......... 750 ......... LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, WA & OR 100 ......... ......... 100 ......... PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE MARINE HABITAT RESTORATION, 400 ......... ......... 1,500 ......... WA................................................ PUYALLUP RIVER, WA................................. .............. ......... 57 .......... ......... SKAGIT RIVER, WA................................... .............. ......... ......... 505 ......... SKOKOMISH RIVER BASIN, WA.......................... .............. ......... ......... 375 ......... WEST VIRGINIA CHERRY RIVER BASIN, WV............................. .............. ......... ......... 150 ......... LITTLE KANAWHA RIVER, WV........................... .............. ......... ......... 300 ......... OHIO RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE STUDY, WV, KY, OH, .............. ......... ......... 600 ......... PA................................................ WISCONSIN WAUWATOSA, WI...................................... .............. ......... 200 .......... ......... ------------------------------------------------------------ SUBTOTAL FOR PROJECTS........................ 33,356 7,727 1,760 83,207 30,306 NATIONAL PROGRAMS AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT TRI-CADD..... 350 ......... ......... 350 ......... ACTIONS FOR CHANGE TO IMPROVE INVESTIGATIONS....... 2,000 ......... ......... .......... ......... COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION...................... 1,400 ......... ......... 5,600 ......... Coastal Data Information Program............... .............. ......... ......... (1,000) ......... Pacific Island Land Ocean Typhoon Experiment, .............. ......... ......... (1,000) ......... HI............................................ Surge and Wave Island Modeling Studies, HI..... .............. ......... ......... (1,200) ......... Wave Data Study................................ .............. ......... ......... (1,000) ......... COMMITTEE ON MARINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS......... 100 ......... ......... 100 ......... ENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIES......................... 75 ......... ......... 75 ......... FEMA/MAP MOD COORDINATION.......................... 1,500 ......... ......... 1,500 ......... FLOOD DAMAGE DATA.................................. 220 ......... ......... 220 ......... FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES.................... 8,000 ......... ......... 11,000 ......... White Clay Creek, New Castle, Delaware......... .............. ......... ......... (200) ......... Hurricane Evacuation Studies, Hawaii........... .............. ......... ......... (1,000) ......... Kekaha Flood Study, HI......................... .............. ......... ......... (100) ......... Iowa Multi-State Dam Safety Analyses, Iowa..... .............. ......... ......... (37) ......... Little Sioux Watershed, IA..................... .............. ......... ......... (30) ......... Mon--Maq Dam Removal Study & Local Floodplain .............. ......... ......... (100) ......... Mas........................................... City of Gretna GIS, Louisiana.................. .............. ......... ......... (254) ......... East Baton Rouge Parish, LA [GIS].............. .............. ......... ......... (400) ......... Livingston Parish, LA (GIS).................... .............. ......... ......... (735) ......... Papillion Creek Watershed, Flood Plain Mapping, .............. ......... ......... (500) ......... Southeastern, PA............................... .............. ......... ......... (300) ......... HYDROLOGIC STUDIES................................. 250 ......... ......... 250 ......... INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW............................ 1,000 ......... ......... 1,000 ......... INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES........................ 200 ......... ......... 200 ......... NATIONAL SHORELINE STUDY........................... 375 ......... ......... 375 ......... OTHER COORDINATION PROGRAMS........................ 4,080 ......... ......... 4,580 ......... Lake Tahoe Coordination............................ .............. ......... ......... (500) ......... PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES...................... 7,000 ......... ......... 8,750 ......... Delaware Estuary Salinity Monitoring Study, .............. ......... ......... (200) ......... Dela- ware................................... Bacon Creek, Sioux City, IA.................... .............. ......... ......... (50) ......... Boyer River, Missouri Valley, IA............... .............. ......... ......... (13) ......... Little Sioux Watershed, IA..................... .............. ......... ......... (30) ......... Kansas River Basin Technical Assistance, Kansas .............. ......... ......... (400) ......... Fife Lake Aquatic Weed Control, MI............. .............. ......... ......... (300) ......... Choctaw County Reservoir, MS................... .............. ......... ......... (100) ......... Jones County Water Supply, MS.................. .............. ......... ......... (50) ......... Mississippi Band of Choctaws, MS............... .............. ......... ......... (50) ......... Assessment of Bridges and Impacts on Flows and .............. ......... ......... (150) ......... F............................................. Asheville, NC.................................. .............. ......... ......... (50) ......... PLANNING SUPPORT PROGRAM........................... 2,100 ......... ......... 3,100 ......... PRECIPITATION STUDIES (NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE)... 225 ......... ......... 225 ......... REMOTE SENSING/GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 150 ......... ......... 150 ......... SUPPORT........................................... RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT........................... 16,892 ......... ......... 28,000 ......... Submerged Aquatic Vegetation, Maryland......... .............. ......... ......... (1,000) ......... SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTERS....... 50 ......... ......... 50 ......... STREAM GAGING (U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY)............. 600 ......... ......... 600 ......... TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS............................. 350 ......... ......... 350 ......... TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM......................... 1,000 ......... ......... 1,000 ......... WATER RESOURCES PRIORITIES STUDY................... 2,000 ......... ......... .......... ......... ------------------------------------------------------------ SUBTOTAL, NATIONAL PROGRAMS.................. 49,917 ......... ......... 67,375 ......... SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE............................... .............. ......... ......... -16,648 ......... ============================================================ TOTAL........................................ 83,273 7,727 1,760 133,934 30,306 GRAND TOTAL.................................. 91,000 91,000 ......... 166,000 ......... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anchorage Harbor Deepening, Alaska.--The Committee recommended $500,000 to complete the feasibility study and to initiate preconstruction engineering and design. Anchorage harbor provides services to approximately 90 percent of the total population of Alaska, including two military bases. Valdez Harbor Expansion, Alaska.--The Committee recommends $150,000 to complete the feasibility phase of the study. The demand for moorage space in the harbor far exceeds the existing capacity of 510 vessels. Rafting during the commercial fishing season has been reported up to eight boats deep on a regular basis. May Branch, Fort Smith, Arkansas.--$500,000 is recommended to continue preconstruction engineering and design for this flood control project. Bolinas Lagoon, California.--The Committee recommends $350,000 to continue feasibility studies of providing solutions that would restore and maintain a natural tidal prism configuration and tidal circulation in the lagoon. Los Angeles River Ecosystem Restoration, California.-- $590,000 is recommended to continue the feasibility studies for environmental and historic riparian habitat restoration. Potential projects may provide opportunities to restore environmental conditions, improve water quality, public access, open space and recreation. The potential projects will maintain or improve the current level of flood damage reduction benefits. Malibu Creek Watershed, California.--The Committee recommendation includes $150,000 to complete the draft feasibility report of methods to manage the sediment to facilitate ongoing efforts to improve the ecosystem in Malibu Creek and lagoon. Rock Creek and Keefer Slough, California.--$200,000 is recommended to continue the feasibility phase of the study. The primary project purposes include flood control with the use of setback levees and floodwalls, and ecosystem restoration and minimum maintenance. The flood control facilities are to be designed with additional capacity to allow for the natural development of habitat. Sacramento-San Joaquin Comprehensive Study, California.-- The Committee recommended $1,000,000 for the feasibility study. The study provides a long-range management program for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins with the objective of improving the flood carrying capacity of the system while restoring and protecting environmental features including wetlands as well as fish and wildlife habitat. Chatfield, Cheery Creek and Bear Creek, Reservoirs.--The recommendation includes $200,000 for feasibility studies to convert flood control storage to water supply storage. Basalt, Colorado.--The Committee recommended $50,000 to review planning studies that were initiated under section 206 of the Continuing Authorities Program to determine if there is a Federal interest in this ecosystem restoration project. Flagler County, Florida.--$250,000 is recommended to continue feasibility studies for shore damage reduction. The Committee notes that recent storms have begun to threaten the county's major evacuation route to State Road A1A. Walton County, Florida.--$591,000 is recommended to continue the preconstruction, engineering and design phase. This study is a test bed for the Institute of Water Resources Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction model. Hilo Harbor Modifications, Hawaii.--The Committee recommends $100,000 to initiate the reconnaissance study to address the Federal interest in modifying the 1930s era designed harbor to accommodate large modern cargo vessels and improve safety in the harbor. Interbasin Control of Great Lakes--Mississippi Aquatic Nuisance Species, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio and Wisconsin.--The Committee recommends $300,000 to initiate studies of the range of options and technologies available to prevent the spread of aquatic nuisance species between the Great lakes and the Mississippi River Basins through various aquatic pathways. Upper Mississippi River--Illinois Waterway Navigation System, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin.-- The Committee recommendation includes $10,000,000 for continuation of preconstruction engineering and design studies. The Committee recognizes the need to modernize this more than 60-year-old navigation system and has provided continued funding for both structural design and environmental restoration work. Humbolt, Iowa.--The Committee recommends $152,000 to initiate a cost-shared feasibility study that would investigate ecosystem restoration on the West Fork of the Des Moines River (fish passage, dam removal, dredging, tributary and floodplain restoration) and ancillary recreational features. Cross Lake, Louisiana.--$250,000 is recommended for investigations of improvements to Cross Lake and alternative sources of fresh water for Shreveport and Caddo Parish. Louisiana Coastal Area Ecosystem Restoration, Louisiana.-- The Committee recommends $10,000,000 for these important studies. The Committee has again elected not to fund a separate Science and Technology line item under this study and directs the Corps not to include this line item in the fiscal year 2010 budget. As has been previously stated by this Committee worthwhile science work should be budgeted within the study line item as is done for all other studies and projects. A separate line item is superfluous. The reduction made to these studies should not be viewed as any diminution of support for these efforts, rather it is an attempt to balance out the Corps of Engineers nationwide program among the various missions of the Corps. To the extent practicable, the Committee directs the Corps to expedite preconstruction engineering and design studies of a sediment diversion at Myrtle Grove. The work should focus on project performance using capacity to take sufficient advantage of large pulsed flows during these less-than-annual high-flow periods, and during river flood events, when a large amount of sediment is freely available in the river water column. The Committee further notes that the success of ongoing efforts to bolster structural hurricane protection and rebuilding hurricane damaged communities depends on arrest and reversal of the coastal land lost problems in the near term, that resolution of the land loss issue will require construction of sediment reintroduction projects, such as the Myrtle Grove diversion. Chesapeake Bay, Susquehanna Reservoir Sediment Management, Maryland, Pennsylvania and Virginia.--It has been estimated that 280 million tons of sediment originating from the Susquehanna River watershed are trapped behind the four hydroelectric dams located on the Lower Susquehanna River between Havre de Grace, Maryland, and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Three of the four dams Holtwood, Safe Harbor, and York Haven have reached steady state. It is estimated that the Conowingo Dam will cease to have trapping capacity in 15 to 20 years. Once this last reservoir reaches steady state, the sediment input to the bay may increase dramatically. The Committee recommendation includes $200,000 for to examine the impact of the Lower Susquehanna River Dams on sediment transport into the Bay. Minnesota River Basin, Minnesota.--The Committee recommendation includes $350,000 for continuation of the feasibility study. This study will evaluate projects/methods to reduce flood damages, restore aquatic ecosystems, create wildlife habitat, reduce erosion and sediment, and improve water quality in the Minnesota River Basin and upper Mississippi River. Missouri River Degradation, Mile 340 to 400, Missouri and Kansas.--The Committee recommended $588,000 to initiate feasibility studies. The Missouri River in this reach has experienced significant degradation or downcutting of the river bed. There is a strong indication that this degradation could impact navigation, flood control and other infrastructure in the area. Yellowstone River Corridor, Montana.--The Committee recommendation includes $500,000 to continue feasibility studies. Delaware Basin Comprehensive, New Jersey.--The Committee recommended $290,000 to continue evaluation of alternative solutions to the region's problems regarding flooding and environmental restoration along the New Jersey portion of the Delaware River and tributaries. Western Lake Erie Basin Study, Ohio, Indiana and Michigan.--$250,000 is recommended to continue the Comprehensive investigation of measures to improve fish and wildlife habitat, navigation, flood damage reduction, recreation, and water quality in the Maumee, Ottawa and Portage River watersheds. Walla Walla River Basin, Oregon and Washington.--$500,000 is recommended to continue preconstruction, engineering and design studies for environmental restoration of the watershed; focusing primarily on establishing year round instream flows. Neches River Basin, Texas.--$100,000 is recommended to initiate reconnaissance studies for flood damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, water supply, and recreation possibilities within the watershed. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Bridge Replacement at Deep Creek, Chesapeake, Virginia.--The Committee recommendation includes $500,000 to continue preconstruction engineering and design phase of the replacement bridge. Montpelier, Vermont.--The Committee recommendation includes $750,000 to initiate feasibility studies of flood damage reduction on the Winooski River. Vicinity of Willoughby Spit, Norfolk, Virginia.--The Committee recommendation includes $200,000 to continue the general reevaluation study of the shore protection project that was severely damaged by Hurricane Isabel. Actions for Change to Improve Investigations.--The Committee did not recommend funding for this item. The Committee believes that the activities proposed in the budget request for this line item should be incorporated into the various funded planning activities that the Corps has underway. Planning Support Program.--The Committee has recommended an additional $1,000,000 above the budget request to support the Planning Centers of Expertise. A portion of these funds should be provided to the National Planning Center of Expertise for Coastal Storm Damage Reduction to develop a process for managing shore protection projects as part of a systems approach to coastal protection for the purpose of achieving improved project performance, increased cost effectiveness, and enhanced benefits. Other Coordination Programs.--$500,000 is recommended for Lake Tahoe coordination activities. Planning Assistance to States.--The Committee recommendation includes $9,000,000 for this nationwide cost- shared program. The Committee recognizes that there are hundreds of these studies on-going at any given time. The Committee has provided a listing in the table of projects that should be given priority if cost sharing funds are available from the local sponsors. Coastal Field Data Collection.--The Committee has recommended $5,600,000 for this nationwide program. In addition to budgeted funds, $4,200,000 has been recommended to continue the Coastal Data Information Program; Surge and Wave Island Modeling Studies, Hawaii; the Pacific Island Land Ocean Typhoon Experiment Program and the Wave Data Study. The California Beach Processes Study has been incorporated into the Coastal Data Information Program. These are all studies that have been underway for a number of years and the Committee supports their continuation. Flood Plain Management Services Program.--The Committee recommendation includes $11,000,000. The Committee has recommended a listing in the table of projects that should be given priority if cost sharing funds are available from the local sponsors. Research and Development.--The Committee has included $28,000,000 for the Corps nationwide research and development programs. The Committee believes that this is an important area of the Corps' program that should be supported and has recommended $11,108,000 above the budget request. Within the funds recommended, the Corps should continue submerged aquatic vegetation research in the Chesapeake Bay. CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL Appropriations, 2008.................................... $2,294,029,000 Budget estimate, 2009\1\................................ 1,402,000,000 Committee recommendation................................ 2,004,500,000 \1\Excludes emergency appropriations of $5,761,000,000. This appropriation includes funds for construction, major rehabilitation and related activities for water resources development projects having navigation, flood and storm damage reduction, water supply, hydroelectric, environmental restoration, and other attendant benefits to the Nation. The construction and major rehabilitation for designated projects for inland and costal waterways will derive one-half of the funding from the Inland Waterway Trust Fund. Funds to be derived from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund will be applied to cover the Federal share of the Dredged Material Disposal Facilities Program. The Committee has previously stated its rejection of the administration's proposal to move projects from this account to the Operations and Maintenance account. Consequently, the Committee has elected to display the President's budget request as if these projects had been requested in the CG account rather than the O&M account. This makes the actual budget request for CG, $1,666,775,000 rather than $1,402,000,000 as requested in the budget. The projects moved from the O&M request include: [In thousands of dollars] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Project Name Amount ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Columbia River Fish Recovery OR & WA.................. $95,700 Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Recovery, IA, KS, MO, 85,000 MT, NE, ND, SD....................................... Chief Joseph Dam Gas Abatement, WA.................... 6,500 Howard Hanson Dam Ecosystem Restoration, WA........... 15,000 Williamette River Temperature Control, OR............. 3,331 Lower Snake River, WA & OR............................ 1,500 Assategue, MD......................................... 500 Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, NJ............ 150 Folly Beach, SC....................................... 35 Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, NY.................. 500 Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, NJ.................. 2,500 Delaware Bay Coastline, Roosevelt Inlet to Lewes 350 Beach, DE............................................ Houston Ship Channel, TX.............................. 500 Section 111 Program................................... 5,325 Poplar Island, MD..................................... 9,185 Dredged Material Disposal Facilities.................. 8,965 Indiana Harbor (Confined Disposal Facility), IN....... 8,385 Section 204/145....................................... 2,278 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, OR and WA.............. 3,123 Markland Locks & Dam, KY & IL......................... 10,600 Locks No. 27, Mississippi River, IL................... 2,598 Lock and Dam 11, Mississippi River, IA................ 2,750 ----------------- TOTAL Projects Migrating from Construction to 264,775 O&M............................................ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The projects that included in the line item above for Dredged Material Disposal Facilities are listed in the Construction, General table. Due to constrained funding, the Committee reduced the requested amounts for some administration projects. This should not be perceived as a lack of support for any of these projects, rather it is an attempt by the Committee to balance out the program across the Nation and fund most of the projects or studies that were funded in fiscal year 2008 but were not addressed by the administration proposal. Even with a $559,000,000 increase to the Corps' accounts, the Committee is unable to address all of the needs. By the Committee's estimate, less than 60 percent of the needed funding is available for this account. Construction schedules will slip due to this constrained funding. This will result in deferred benefits to the national economy. The Committee does not believe that there is any way to prioritize our way out of this problem without serious unintended consequences. Adequate resources have been denied for too long. Only providing adequate resources for these national investments will resolve this situation. The Committee has included a limited number of new construction starts as well as provided completion funding for a number of projects. As in the General Investigations account, the Committee has embraced the traditional view of new starts. New starts are generally defined as those projects that have not received Construction, General funding in the past or those that required new authorization to undertake the work. The Committee has not included the administration's proposed new construction starts for the lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Washington, major rehabilitation study that was proposed for funding in the Operations and Maintenance account because it would be cost-shared with the Inland Waterway Trust Fund. The appropriation provides funds for the Continuing Authorities Program (projects which do not require specific authorizing legislation), which includes projects for flood control (section 205), emergency streambank and shoreline protection (section 14), beach erosion control (section 103), mitigation of shore damages (section 111), navigation projects (section 107), snagging and clearing (section 208), aquatic ecosystem restoration (section 206), beneficial uses of dredged material (section 204), and project modifications for improvement of the environment (section 1135). The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are shown on the following table: CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL [In thousands of dollars] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Committee Project title Budget estimate recommendation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ALABAMA MOBILE HARBOR TURNING BASIN, AL....... ............... 3,400 PINHOOK CREEK, HUNTSVILLE, AL......... ............... 1,400 TUSCALOOSA, AL........................ ............... 7,500 ALASKA AKUTAN HARBOR, AK..................... ............... 3,000 ALASKA COASTAL EROSION, AK............ ............... 4,500 HAINES BOAT HARBOR, AK................ ............... 1,000 SEWARD HARBOR BREAKWATER EXTENSION.... ............... 1,000 ST. PAUL HARBOR, AK................... ............... 2,000 UNALASKA, AK.......................... ............... 6,000 ARIZONA NOGALES WASH, AZ...................... ............... 3,000 RIO DE FLAG FLAGSTAFF, AZ............. ............... 3,000 TRES RIOS, AZ......................... ............... 3,000 ARKANSAS OZARK--JETA TAYLOR POWERHOUSE, AR 17,300 17,300 (MAJOR REHAB)........................ RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAN, LA, AR & ............... 2,500 TX................................... RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION, ............... 4,000 AR & LA.............................. WHITE RIVER MINIMUM FLOW, AR.......... ............... 2,000 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (COMMON 13,000 13,000 FEATURES) , CA....................... AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM 9,000 9,000 MODIFICATIONS), CA................... AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM ............... 2,000 RAISE), CA........................... CALFED LEVEE STABILITY PROGRAM, CA.... ............... 5,000 GUADALUPE RIVER, CA................... ............... 5,000 HAMILTON AIRFIELD WETLANDS 4,900 4,900 RESTORATION, CA...................... HARBOR/SOUTH BAY WATER RECYCLING ............... 3,000 PROJECT, CA.......................... KAWEAH RIVER, CA...................... 1,000 1,000 LLAGAS CREEK, CA...................... ............... 400 LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA.. 5,700 5,700 MID VALLEY AREA LEVEE, CA............. ............... 1,500 MURRIETA CREEK, CA.................... ............... 5,000 NAPA RIVER, CA........................ 7,395 11,000 OAKLAND HARBOR (50-FOOT PROJECT), CA.. 25,092 24,000 PETALUMA RIVER, CA.................... ............... 350 PORT LOS ANGELES HARBOR MAIN CHANNEL ............... 885 DEEPENING, CA........................ SACRAMENTO DEEPWATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA. 900 900 SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION 23,968 23,968 PROJECT, CA.......................... SACRAMENTO RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, GRR, ............... 500 CA................................... SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA ............... 500 IRRIGATION, CA....................... SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA..... ............... 1,000 SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA................ ............... 750 SAN RAMON VALLEY RECYCLED WATER, CA... ............... 3,500 SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA.......... 8,100 14,000 SANTA MARIA RIVER LEVEES, CA.......... ............... 6,000 SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS, CA... 12,000 12,000 SUCCESS DAM, TULE RIVER, CA (DAM 8,000 8,000 SAFETY).............................. SUCCESS DAM, TULE RIVER (ENLARGEMENT), ............... 500 CA................................... TAHOE BASIN RESTORATION, CA........... ............... 3,000 UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CA............. ............... 5,000 UPPER NEWPORT BAY, CA................. ............... 3,000 WEST SACRAMENTO, CA................... ............... 2,000 YUBA RIVER BASIN, CA.................. ............... 3,000 CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 500 INFRASTRUCTURE, CT................... DELAWARE DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, ROOSEVELT ............... 350 INLET TO LEWES BEACH................. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE......... ............... 390 FLORIDA BREVARD COUNTY, FL.................... ............... 500 CEDAR HAMMOCK, WARES CREEK, FL........ 2,773 2,773 FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY ............... 2,200 IMPROVEMENTS, FL..................... HERBERT HOOVER DIKE, FL (SEEPAGE 77,400 77,400 CONTROL)............................. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL............... ............... 3,500 LAKE WORTH SAND TRANSFER PLANT, FL.... ............... 1,000 MIAMI HARBOR, FL...................... ............... 500 PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL............... ............... 1,000 SOUTH FLORIDA EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM 185,000 130,000 RESTORATION, FL...................... Central and Southern Florida, FL.. (100,188) (95,188) Everglades and S. Florida (3,797) (3,797) Ecosystem Restoration............ Kissimmee River, FL............... (31,015) (31,015) Modified Water Deliveries, FL..... (50,000) ............... ST. LUCIE INLET, FL................... 4,000 4,000 TAMPA HARBOR, FL...................... ............... 500 GEORGIA ATLANTA, EI, GA....................... ............... 2,000 RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & 1,450 1,450 SC................................... HAWAII IAO STREAMS, HI................ ............... 500 IDAHO RURAL IDAHO........................... ............... 4,000 ILLINOIS CHAIN OF ROCKS CANAL, MISSISSIPPI 2,500 2,500 RIVER, IL (DEF CORR)................. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL 5,750 5,750 DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL................ CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, 500 500 SECOND BARRIER, IL................... CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL................. 1,000 4,000 DES PLAINES RIVER, IL................. 5,620 8,000 EAST ST. LOUIS, IL.................... 200 1,207 EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL....... ............... 375 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, LOCKPORT LOCK AND 28,600 28,600 DAM, IL (REPLACEM.................... LOCK AND DAM 27, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, IL ............... 2,598 (MAJOR REHAB)........................ MCCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL.... 34,000 34,000 NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ............... 300 IL................................... OLMSTED LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, IL 114,000 114,000 & KY................................. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION, 20,000 18,000 IL, IA, MN, MO &..................... WOOD RIVER LEVEE, IL.................. 684 3,700 INDIANA NDIANA HARBOR CONFIND DISPOSAL ............... 8,385 FACILITY, IN\1\...................... LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN.............. 8,000 8,000 IOWA DAVENPORT, IA......................... ............... 4,850 DES MOINES AND RACCOON RIVERS, IA..... ............... 5,000 DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND ............... 3,900 GREENBELT, IA........................ LOCK AND DAM 11, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, IA ............... 2,750 (MAJOR REHAB)........................ MISSOURI RIVER FISH MITIGATION, IA, ............... 70,000 KS, MO, MT, NE \1\................... PERRY CREEK, IA....................... ............... 3,800 KANSAS TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KS & MO........... 10,000 10,000 TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS (DAM SAFETY).... 23,800 23,800 KENTUCKY KENTUCKY LOCK AND DAM, TENNESSEE 22,330 22,330 RIVER, KY............................ MARKLAND LOCKS AND DAM, KY, IL (MAJOR ............... 10,600 REHAB)\1\............................ MCALPINE LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, KY 6,270 6,270 & IN................................. WOLF CREEK, KY (SEEPAGE CONTROL)...... 57,000 57,000 LOUISIANA COMITE RIVER DIVERSION CANAL, LA...... ............... 10,000 EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LA (FC)...... ............... 2,000 INNER HARBOR NAVIGATION CANAL LOCK ............... 2,000 REPLACEMENT, LA...................... J BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA....... 1,500 8,500 LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (CG)...... ............... 2,500 OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA............. ............... 1,600 MARYLAND ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MD & ............... 30 DC................................... ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MD\1\.............. ............... 1,900 ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND, MD........ ............... 200 BALTIMORE METRO RESOURCES, GWYNNS ............... 500 FALLS, MD............................ CHARLESTOWN, MD....................... ............... 50 CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 2,500 RESTORATION AND PROTECTION........... CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD & ............... 2,000 VA................................... CUMBERLAND, MD........................ ............... 200 POPLAR ISLAND, MD\1\.................. ............... 12,000 MASSASSACHUSETTS MUDDY RIVER, MA....................... 4,000 5,000 MICHIGAN GENESEE COUNTY, MI.................... ............... 600 GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM ............... 2,500 RESTORATION, MI...................... NEGAUNEE, MI.......................... ............... 500 SAULT STE. MARIE, MI.................. ............... 2,000 MINNESOTA BRECKENRIDGE, MN...................... ............... 2,877 CROOKSTON, MN......................... 300 300 LOCK AND DAM 3, MISSISSIPPI RIVER ............... 2,000 (MAJOR REHAB), MN.................... MISSISSIPPI DESOTO COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER ............... 4,860 SYSTEM, MS........................... MISSISSIPPI ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 18,000 INFRASTRUCTURE, MS................... MISSOURI BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO..... ............... 2,000 BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO... 1,700 1,700 CHESTERFIELD, MO...................... ............... 3,000 CLEARWATER LAKE, MO (SEEPAGE CONTROL). 25,000 25,000 MISS RIVER BTWN THE OHIO AND MO RIVERS 5,011 5,011 (REG WORKS), MO...................... MISSOURI & MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ............... 1,500 ENHANCEMENT, MO...................... MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (L-385), ............... 2,600 MO, IA, NE & KS...................... ST. LOUIS FLOOD PROTECTION, MO........ 2,000 3,750 SWOPE PARK INDUSTRIAL AREA, KANSAS ............... 2,000 CITY, MO............................. MONTANA FORT PECK CABIN CONVEYANCE, MT........ ............... 1,500 RURAL MONTANA, MT..................... ............... 5,000 NEBRASKA ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NE........... 4,828 4,828 MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, ............... 1,000 NE & SD.............................. SAND CREEK, SAUNDERS COUNTY, NE....... ............... 2,400 WESTERN SARPY COUNTY AND CLEAR CREEK, ............... 3,000 NE................................... NEVADA RURAL, NV (EI)........................ ............... 18,000 NEW JERSEY BARNEGAT INLET TO LITTLE EGG HARBOR, 11,700 11,700 NJ (NJ SHORE PROT.................... BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR ............... 3,000 INLET (ABSECON IS.................... BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR ............... 80 INLET, BRIGANTINE.................... CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, ............... 2,500 NJ\1\................................ DELAWARE RIVER MAIN CHANNEL DEEPENING, ............... 5,000 NJ, PA & DE.......................... GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, ............... 3,000 NJ................................... GREAT EGG HARBOR TO TOWNSENDS INLET, ............... 250 NJ................................... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ............ ............... 100 JOSEPH G. MINISH WATERFRONT, NJ....... ............... 4,000 LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY ............... 150 POINT, NJ\1\......................... PASSAIC RIVER PRESERVATION OF NATURAL ............... 1,500 STORAGE AREAS, NJ.................... RAMAPO RIVER AT MAHWAH AND SUFFERN, NJ ............... 500 RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, PORT ............... 2,000 MONMOUTH, NJ......................... RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK SUB- 10,000 10,000 BASIN, NJ............................ SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ...... ............... 2,000 TOWNSENDS INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ. ............... 3,000 NEW MEXICO ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM........ ............... 2,400 ALAMOGORDO, NM........................ 4,200 4,200 CENTRAL NEW MEXICO, NM................ ............... 5,000 MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, ............... 800 BERNALILLO TO BELE................... MIDDLE RIO GRANDE RESTORATION, NM..... ............... 24,016 NEW MEXICO (Environmental ............... 7,000 Infrastructure), NM.................. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO 800 800 BOSQUE DEL APACHE, NM................ SOUTHWEST VALLEY ALBUQUERQUE, NM...... ............... 8,000 NEW YORK ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, LONG ............... 100 BEACH ISLAND, NY..................... ATLANTIC COAST OF NYC, ROCKAWAY INLET 3,800 3,800 TO NORTON POINT,..................... EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET ............... 750 & JAMAICA BAY, NY.................... FIRE ISAND INLET TO JONES INLET, NY\1\ ............... 500 FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY 2,150 2,150 NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY & 90,000 85,000 NJ................................... NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED, NY........... ............... 1,000 NORTH CAROLINA BRUNSWICK COUNTY BEACHES, NC.......... ............... 250 WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC................. ............... 2,000 WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC................ ............... 300 NORTH DAKOTA GARRISON DAM AND POWER PLANT, ND 3,500 3,500 (REPLACEMENT)........................ LAKE SAKAKAWEA PROJECT, ND............ ............... 17,048 MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, ND........ ............... 1,000 NORTH DAKOTA ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 10,000 INFRASTRUCTURE, ND................... OHIO METROPOLITAN REGION OF CINCINNATI, 4,000 4,000 DUCK CREEK, OH....................... OKLAHOMA CANTON LAKE, OK (DAM SAFETY).......... 21,200 21,200 OREGON COLUMBIA RIVER CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, 36,000 36,000 OR & WA.............................. COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS 2,455 2,455 SITES, OR & WA....................... ELK CREEK LAKE, OR.................... 3,120 3,120 WILLAMETTE TEMPERATURE CONTROL, OR\1\. ............... 3,331 PENNSYLVANIA EMSWORTH L&D, OHIO RIVER, PA (STATIC 25,800 25,800 INSTABILITY CORRE.................... GRAYS LANDING LOCK AND DAM, 600 600 MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA................ LACKAWANNA RIVER, SCRANTON, PA........ ............... 4,782 LOCKS AND DAMS 2, 3, AND 4, 40,806 19,050 MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA................ POINT MARION, LOCK AND DAM 8, 150 150 MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA &.............. PRESQUE ISLE, PA...................... ............... 1,000 WYOMING VALLEY (LEVEE RAISING), PA.... ............... 3,000 PUERTO RICO PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR....... 45,000 43,000 RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR.................. 12,000 12,000 SOUTH CAROLINA FOLLY BEACH, SC\1\.................... ............... 35 SOUTH DAKOTA BIG SIOUX RIVER, SIOUX FALLS, SD...... ............... 4,000 CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER ............... 4,000 BRULE SIOUX, SD...................... TENNESSEE CENTER HILL DAM, TN (SEEPAGE CONTROL). 53,400 53,400 CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN. 42,000 42,000 TEXAS BRAYS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX.............. 5,382 5,382 CENTRAL CITY, FORT WORTH, UPPER ............... 500 TRINITY RIVER, TX.................... CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX....... ............... 2,000 DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TRINITY ............... 13,000 RIVER, TX............................ HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, 21,700 19,700 TX................................... HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX\1\........... ............... 500 JOHNSON CREEK, UPPER TRINITY BASIN, ............... 2,000 ARLINGTON, TX........................ RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & ............... 1,500 OK................................... SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX... ............... 10,000 SIMS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX............... 23,465 21,465 TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX................ ............... 3,000 UTAH RURAL UTAH, UT (EI)................... ............... 12,000 VERMONT BURLINGTON HARBOR, VT................. ............... 500 LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED INITIATE, VT. ............... 2,000 VIRGINIA JAMES RIVER DEEPWATER TURNING BASIN, ............... 1,763 VA................................... JOHN H KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & NC 14,000 14,000 (REPLACEMENT)........................ LYNCHBURG CSO, VA..................... ............... 300 NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS ............... 1,000 (DEEPENING), VA...................... RICHMOND CSO, VA...................... ............... 300 ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, HEADWATERS 1,075 1,075 AREA, VA............................. VIRGINIA BEACH (HURRICANE PROTECTION), ............... 3,000 VA................................... WASHINGTON CHIEF JOSEPH GAS ABATEMENT, WA\1\..... ............... 2,500 COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, OR & ............... 92,000 WA\1\................................ DUWAMISH AND GREEN RIVER BASIN, WA.... ............... 3,000 HOWARD HANSEN DAM, WA\1\.............. ............... 15,000 LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM 1,500 1,500 RESTORATION, OR & WA................. LOWER MONUMENT LOCK & DAM, WA\1\...... ............... ............... LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE ............... 1,500 COMP, WA, OR, ID\1\.................. MOUNT ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA. 1,410 4,410 MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA (FISH PASSAGE)... 1,000 1,000 PUGET SOUND AND ADJACENT WATERS ............... 621 RESTORATION, WA...................... SHOALWATER BAY SHORELINE, WA.......... ............... 2,000 WEST VIRGINIA BLUESTONE LAKE, WV (DAM SAFETY 12,000 12,000 ASSURANCE)........................... GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WV............ ............... 1,500 ISLAND CREEK BASIN IN AND AROUND ............... 200 LOGAN, WV............................ LEVISA AND TUG FORKS AND UPPER CUMBERLAND RIVER, WV, VA: Virgina........................... ............... 8,000 West Virginia..................... ............... 8,500 LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WV........... ............... 1,050 MARMET LOCK, KANAWHA RIVER, WV........ 9,000 9,000 ROBERT C. BYRD LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO 1,000 1,000 RIVER, WV & OH....................... STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV............ 900 900 WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE HARBOR CDF EXPANSION, WI.... ............... 1,600 --------------------------------- SUBTOTAL FOR PROJECTS........... 1,296,684 1,897,220 NATIONAL PROGRAMS ABANDONED MINE RESTORATION............ ............... 1,000 ACTIONS FOR CHANGE TO IMPROVE 4,600 ............... CONSTRUCTION......................... AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL PROGRAM......... 3,500 4,550 CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM: AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION 10,295 25,000 (SECTION 206).................... Chattahoochee Fall Line ............... ............... Ecosystem, AL & GA........... Brownsville Branch, AR........ ............... ............... St. Helena--Napa River ............... ............... Project, CA.................. Sweetwater Reservoir Ecosystem ............... ............... Restoration, CA.............. Upper York Creek Dam Removal, ............... ............... CA........................... Arkansas River Habitat ............... ............... Restoration Project, CO...... Blue River, CO................ ............... ............... Goose Creek, CO............... ............... ............... Lower Boulder Creek, CO....... ............... ............... North Fork Gunnison River, CO. ............... ............... Tamarisk Eradication, CO...... ............... ............... Rose Bay, Voluisia Co, FL..... ............... ............... Jackson Creek, GA............. ............... ............... Mokuhinia/Mokuula Restoration, ............... ............... HI........................... Emiquon Preserve, IL.......... ............... ............... Eugene Field, IL.............. ............... ............... Hofmann Dam, IL............... ............... ............... Orland Park, IL............... ............... ............... Squaw Creek, (Round Lake ............... ............... Drain), IL................... Chariton River/Rathbun Lake, ............... ............... IA........................... Duck Creek, Davenport, IA..... ............... ............... Whitebreast Creek Watershed, ............... ............... IA........................... Storm Lake, IA................ ............... ............... Ventura Marsh Habitat, Clear ............... ............... Lake, IA..................... Buras Marina, LA.............. ............... ............... Lake Killarney, Louisiana ............... ............... State Penitentiary, LA....... Lake Verret, Assumption ............... ............... Parish, LA................... Mandeville Ecosystem ............... ............... Restoration, LA.............. University Lakes, Baton Rouge, ............... ............... LA........................... Vermillion River Ecosystem ............... ............... Restoration, LA.............. Zemurray Park Lake ............... ............... Restoration, Tangipahoa Paris Milford Pond Restoration, ............... ............... Milford, MA.................. Deep Run/Tiber Hudson, Howard ............... ............... County, MD................... Dog Island Shoals, MD......... ............... ............... Greenbury Point, MD........... ............... ............... North Beach, MD............... ............... ............... Northwest Branch, Anacostia ............... ............... River, MD.................... Pleasure Island, MD........... ............... ............... Urieville Lake, MD............ ............... ............... Western Branch, Patuxent ............... ............... River, MD.................... Wright's Creek, Dorchester ............... ............... Creek, MD.................... Marion Aquatic Ecosystem ............... ............... Restoration, MI.............. Painter Creek, MN............. ............... ............... Musconetcong River Dam ............... ............... Removals, NJ................. Pennsville, Salem County, NJ.. ............... ............... Rancocas Creek Fish Passage, ............... ............... NJ........................... Kings Park, NY................ ............... ............... Lower Hempstead Harbor, NY.... ............... ............... Soundview Park, Bronx, NY..... ............... ............... Asheville, Buncombe County, NC ............... ............... Concord Streams Restoration, ............... ............... NC........................... Heron Haven, NE............... ............... ............... Wilson Bay Restoration, NC.... ............... ............... Drayton Dam, ND............... ............... ............... Christine/Hickson Dams, ND.... ............... ............... Incline and Third Creeks, NV.. ............... ............... Blue Hole Lake State Park, NM. ............... ............... Bottomless Lakes State Park, ............... ............... NM........................... Janes-Wallace Memorial Dam, ............... ............... Santa Rosa, NM............... Olentangy 5th Avenue Dam, OH.. ............... ............... Arrowhead Creek, OR........... ............... ............... Beaver Creek, OR.............. ............... ............... Eugene Delta Ponds, OR........ ............... ............... Camp Creek--Zumwalt Prairie, ............... ............... OR........................... Springfield Millrace, OR...... ............... ............... Codorus Creek Watershed ............... ............... Restoration, PA.............. Winneapaug Pond Restoration, ............... ............... RI........................... Spring Lake, San Marcos, TX... ............... ............... Stephenville, WWTP, TX........ ............... ............... Tangier Island, Accomack ............... ............... County, VA................... Carpenter Creek, WA........... ............... ............... BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED ............... 7,187 MATERIAL (SECTION 204,........... Isle Aux Herbes, AL........... ............... ............... Blackhawk Bottoms, IA......... ............... ............... Atchafalaya River, Shell ............... ............... Island, St. Mary Parish...... Barataria Bay Waterway, LA.... ............... ............... Calc Rv, Mi 5-14 Ks, LA....... ............... ............... Shell Island Pass, LA......... ............... ............... Newburyport Harbor, MA........ ............... ............... 21st Avenue West Channel, ............... ............... Duluth, MN................... Wanchese Marsh Creation, NC... ............... ............... Maumee Bay Restoration, OH.... ............... ............... Wynn Road CDF, OH............. ............... ............... Restoration of Cat Islands, WI ............... ............... EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE 2,301 10,000 PROTECTION (SEC.................. FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION 2,617 43,123 205)............................. Wynne, AR..................... ............... ............... Cosgrove Creek, Calaveras ............... ............... County, CA................... Las Gallinas Creek/Santa ............... ............... Venetia Levee, CA............ White Slough, CA.............. ............... ............... Oak Creek, Florence, Colorado. ............... ............... Little Mill Creek, New Castle ............... ............... County, DE................... Pennsylvania Avenue ............... ............... Improvement Project, Bethany. Turkey Creek, Ben Hill County, ............... ............... GA........................... Keopu-Hienaloli Stream, HI.... ............... ............... Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, HI..... ............... ............... Wailele Stream, Oahu, HI...... ............... ............... Indian/Dry Creek Cedar Rapids, ............... ............... IA........................... Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA...... ............... ............... Red Oak Creek, Red Oak, IA.... ............... ............... Winnebago River, Mason City, ............... ............... IA........................... Crosscreek, Rossville, KS..... ............... ............... Concordia, KS................. ............... ............... Eureka Creek, Manhattan, KS... ............... ............... Hopkinsville Dry-Dam, KY...... ............... ............... Bayou Choupique, St. Mary ............... ............... Parish, LA................... Bayou Queue de Tortue, ............... ............... Vermillion Parish, LA........ Town of Carencro, Lafayette ............... ............... Parish, LA................... Elkton, MD.................... ............... ............... North River, Peabody, MA...... ............... ............... Salisbury RIver, Brockton, MA. ............... ............... Ada, MN....................... ............... ............... Montevideo, MN................ ............... ............... Granite Falls, MN............. ............... ............... McKinney Bayou, Tunica County, ............... ............... MS........................... Blacksnake Creek, St. Joseph, ............... ............... MO........................... Livingston, MT................ ............... ............... Little River Diversion, ............... ............... Dutchtown, MO................ Platte River, Fremont, NE..... ............... ............... Platte River, Schuyler, NE.... ............... ............... Randolph, NE (Middle Logan ............... ............... Creek)....................... Jewett Brook, Laconia, NH..... ............... (100) Hatch, NM..................... ............... ............... Assunpink Creek, Hamilton ............... ............... Township, Mercer County, NJ.. Jackson Brook, NJ............. ............... ............... Mill Brook, Highland Park, NJ. ............... ............... Pennsville, NJ................ ............... ............... Poplar Brook, Deal and Ocean ............... ............... Township, NJ................. Upper Passaic River and ............... ............... Tributaries, Long Hill Township, NJ................. Port Jervis, NY............... ............... ............... Pigeon River Watershed, NC.... ............... ............... Swannanoa River Watershed, NC. ............... ............... Wahpeton, ND.................. ............... ............... Rio Descalabrado, PR.......... ............... ............... Rio Guamani-Guaya, PR......... ............... ............... Blanchard River, Ottawa, OH... ............... ............... Duck Creek Flood Warning ............... ............... System, OH................... Findley, OH................... ............... ............... Independence, OH.............. ............... ............... Philadelphia Shipyard Sea ............... ............... Wall, Philadelphia, PA....... Beaver Creek & Tribs, Bristol, ............... ............... TN........................... Farmers Branch, Tarrant ............... ............... County, TX................... Pecan Creek, Gainesville, TX.. ............... ............... WV Statewide Flood Warning ............... ............... System, WV................... NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107).. 559 8,000 Savoonga Harbor, AK........... ............... ............... Kahoolawe Harbor, Kahoolawe, ............... ............... HI........................... North Kohala Navigation ............... ............... Improvements, HI............. Port Fourchon Extension, ............... ............... Lafourche Parish, LA......... Shortcut Canal, Terrebonne ............... ............... Parish, LA................... Bass Harbor, ME............... ............... ............... Round Pond, Bristol, ME....... ............... ............... St. Jerome's Creek, St. Mary ............... ............... County, MD................... Mackinac Isle, Harbor ............... ............... Breakwall, MI................ Northwestern Michigan, ............... ............... Traverse City, MI............ Ontonagon Channel Extension, ............... ............... MI........................... Grand Marais Harbor of Refuge, ............... ............... MN........................... McQuade Road Harbor of Refuge, ............... ............... Duluth, MN................... Hampton Harbor, NH............ ............... ............... Ottawa River Navigation, ............... ............... Toledo, OH................... Delaware River, Fairless ............... ............... Turning Basin, PA............ Charlestown Breachway and ............... ............... Inlet, RI.................... Northwest Tennessee Harbor, TN ............... ............... Nassawadox Creek, VA.......... ............... ............... MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES ............... 10,000 (SECTION 111)\1\................. Mobile Pass, AL............... ............... ............... Camp Ellis, Saco, ME.......... ............... ............... Vermillion, OH................ ............... ............... Fairport Harbor, OH........... ............... ............... Mattituck Harbor, NY.......... ............... ............... Tybee Island Channel Impacts, ............... ............... GA........................... PROJECT MODS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF 6,544 25,000 THE ENVIRONMENT (SECTION 1135)... Lower Cache Restoration, AR... ............... ............... Millwood Lake, Grassy Lake, AR ............... ............... Rock Creek @ Boyle Park, ............... ............... Little Rock, AR.............. Tujunga Wash Environmental ............... ............... Restoration, CA.............. Lower Kingman Island, DC...... ............... ............... Kanaha Pond, Maui, HI......... ............... ............... Kaunakakai Str, Molokai, HI... ............... ............... Rathbun Lake Habitat ............... ............... Restoration, IA.............. Indian Ridge Marsh, Chicago, ............... ............... IL........................... Green River Dam, Mod, KY...... ............... ............... Bayou Desiard, Monroe, LA..... ............... ............... Frazier/Whitehorse Oxbow Lake ............... ............... Weir, LA..................... Lake Fausse Pointe, Iberia ............... ............... Parish, LA................... Lake St. Joseph, Tensas ............... ............... Parish, LA................... Morganza Fore-Bay Restoration, ............... ............... LA........................... Sea Lamprey Barrier Program, ............... ............... MI........................... Lake Whittington Weir, MS & AR ............... ............... Sand Hill River, MN........... ............... ............... Duck Creek, MO................ ............... ............... Bloomington State Park, MO.... ............... ............... Blue Valley Wetlands, Jackson, ............... ............... MO........................... Prison Farm, ND............... ............... ............... Assunpink Creek, Trenton, NJ.. ............... ............... Lincoln Park West, Ecosystem ............... ............... Restoration Study,........... Pine Mount Creek, NJ.......... ............... ............... Pond Creek Salt Marsh ............... ............... Restoration, Cape May County, NJ........................... Las Cruces Dam Environmental ............... ............... Restoration, Dona Ana County, NM........................... Pueblo of Santa Ana Aquatic ............... ............... Restoration, NM.............. Route 66 Environmental ............... ............... Restoration, Albuquerque, NM. Spring Creek, NY.............. ............... ............... Belhaven Harbor, NC........... ............... ............... Tappan Lake, OH............... ............... ............... Lower Columbia Slough, OR..... ............... ............... Eagleland Ecosystem, TX....... ............... ............... Lake Champlain Lamprey ............... ............... Barriers, VT................. Village of Oyster, Northampton ............... ............... County, VA................... Braided Reach, WA............. ............... ............... Shorty's Island, WA........... ............... ............... SHORE PROTECTION (SECTION 103).... ............... 7,500 Athol Springs, Lake Erie, NY.. ............... ............... Lasalle Park, Buffalo, NY..... ............... ............... Old Lakeshore Road, NY........ ............... ............... Lake Erie At Painesville, OH.. ............... ............... Philadelphia Shipyard, PA..... ............... ............... Ft. San Geronimo, PR.......... ............... ............... Veteren's Drive Shoreline, St. ............... ............... Thomas, VI................... Chesapeake Bay Shoreline, ............... ............... Hampton, VA.................. Lincoln Park Beach Seattle, WA ............... ............... SNAGGING AND CLEARING (SECTION ............... 500 208)............................. Muscatatuck River Log Jam, ............... ............... Scott County, IN............. Oran, MO...................... ............... ............... Blackwell Lake, Blackwell, OK. ............... ............... DAM SAFETY AND SEEPAGE/STABILITY 48,600 48,650 CORRECTION PROGRAM................... Dam Safety Assurance Studies: Isabella Dam, CA.............. ............... ............... Martis Creek Dam, CA & NV..... ............... ............... Cherry Creek Dam, CO.......... ............... ............... Dworshak Dam, ID.............. ............... ............... Mississippi Lock and Dam 25, ............... ............... MO........................... John Day Lock and Dam, OR & WA ............... ............... Seepage/Stability Correction Major Rehabilitation Study: Hidden Dam, CA................ ............... ............... Whittier Narrows Dam, CA...... ............... ............... Hop Brook Dam, CT............. ............... ............... Mansfield Hollow Dam, CT...... ............... ............... Lake Shelbyville Dam, IL...... ............... ............... Green River Lake Dam, KY...... ............... ............... J. Edward Roush Dam, KY....... ............... ............... Nolin Lake dam, KY............ ............... ............... Rough River Lake Dam, KY...... ............... ............... Salamonie Lake Dam, KY........ ............... ............... Beach City Dam, OH............ ............... ............... Bolivar Dam, OH............... ............... ............... Mohawk Dam, OH................ ............... ............... Zoar Levee (Dover Dam), OH.... ............... ............... Keystone lake Dam, OK......... ............... ............... East Branch Dam, Clarion ............... ............... River, PA.................... Montgomery Locks and Dam, PA.. ............... ............... Addicks Dam, Buffalo Bayou, TX ............... ............... Lewisville Dam, TX............ ............... ............... Ball Mountain Dam, VT......... ............... ............... DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL FACILITIES ............... 8,965 PROGRAM (DMDF)....................... Savannah Harbor, GA............... ............... ............... Rogue River, MI................... ............... ............... Charleston Harbor, SC............. ............... ............... Green Bay Harbor, WI.............. ............... ............... EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION................ 21,000 21,000 ESTUARY RESTORATION PROGRAM (PUBLIC 5,000 1,000 LAW 106-457)......................... INLAND WATERWAYS USERS BOARD--BOARD 50 50 EXPENSE.............................. INLAND WATERWAYS USERS BOARD--CORPS 250 250 EXPENSE.............................. SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT ............... 875 & DEMONSTRATION...................... --------------------------------- SUBTOTAL FOR NATIONAL PROGRAMS.. 105,316 222,650 SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE.................. ............... -115,370 --------------------------------- TOTAL........................... 1,402,000 2,004,500 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ \1\ITEMS REQUESTED BY THE ADMINISTRATION IN OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE. Tuscaloosa, Alabama.--The Committee recommends $7,500,000 for the relocation project at Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Akutan Harbor, Alaska.--The Committee recommendation includes $3,000,000 to continue construction of this project. Alaska Coastal Erosion, Alaska.--The Committee recommendation provides $4,500,000 for Alaska Coastal Erosion. The following communities are eligible recipients of these funds: Kivalina, Newtok, Shishmaref, Koyukuk, Barrow, Kaktovik, Point Hope, Unalakleet, and Bethel. Nogales Wash, Arizona.--The Committee recommends $3,000,000 for continuation of this flood control project. Red River Below Denison Dam, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas.--The Committee recommends $2,500,000 to continue levee rehabilitation work in Arkansas and Louisiana to protect the 1.7 million acre flood plain from crop damage; loss of livestock; damage to levees, railroads, highways, industries, and other river and urban developments. Red River Emergency Bank Protection, Arkansas and Louisiana.--The Committee recommends $4,000,000 for protection of critical infrastructure and land along the Red River below Index, Arkansas. The project plan provides for revetment, dikes, or cutoffs that can be accomplished in advance of developing the design for the entire project. American River Watershed (Folsom Dam Miniraise), California.--The Committee recommends $2,000,000. Within the funds recommended, $1,000,000 is for the replacement bridge. Mid Valley Area Levee Reconstruction, California.---The Committee recommendation includes $1,500,000 reconstruction of this flood control project. The project includes levee reconstruction through installing landside berms with toe drains, ditch relocation, embankment modification, slurry cut- off walls, and developing land for fish and wildlife mitigation. Oakland Harbor, California.--The Committee recommends $24,000,000 to continue construction of this project. The reduction made to this project should not be viewed as any diminution of support for this project, rather an attempt to balance out the Corps of Engineers nationwide program among the various missions of the Corps. Santa Ana River, California.--The Committee recommends $14,000,000 to continue construction of this flood control project. West Sacramento, California.--The Committee recommendation includes $2,000,000 for a general reevaluation of the flood control project and other project needs. Delaware Coast Protection, Delaware.--The Committee recommendation includes $350,000 to reimburse the state for the Federal share of the annual operation and maintenance of the sand bypass facilities. Everglades and South Florida Ecosystem Restoration, Florida.--The Committee has chosen to display the various, separately authorized components of the project in the table in addition to a single line item as was proposed in the budget. The Committee believes that it is prudent to maintain visibility of the various project elements in the budget process. The reduction made under this heading should not be viewed as any diminution of support for this project, rather an attempt to balance out the Corps of Engineers nationwide program among the various missions of the Corps. The Committee has provided no funding for the Modified Waters Delivery Plan as proposed in the budget. The Committee has chosen to fund this project in the Department of the Interior and related agencies bill. The Committee directs the administration to include the Modified Waters Delivery Plan funding in the Interior budget in future budget submissions. Central and South Florida, Florida.--Within the funds recommended, the Corps shall continue work on the Upper St. Johns River project. Florida Keys Water Quality Improvements, Florida.--The Committee recommendation includes $2,200,000 for continued implementation of this project. The Committee urges the administration to budget for this project due to the interrelationship of this work to the Everglades Restoration project, Biscayne Bay and southern Florida's nearshore waters. Jacksonville Harbor, Florida.--The Committee has recommended $3,500,000 to continue work on the channel deepening project as well as for a second general reevaluation report. Tampa Harbor, Florida.--$500,000 is provided for preconstruction engineering and design of navigation improvements and channel deepening. Atlanta, Georgia.--The Committee recommendation includes $2,000,000 to continue this project. Rural Idaho Environmental Infrastructure, Idaho.--The Committee recommends $4,000,000 for this project. Within the funds provided the Corps should give consideration to projects at Aamon (Eastern Idaho Regional Project), Bellevue, Buhl, Burley, Greenleaf, Hazelton, Lava Hot Springs, Pocatello, Rexburg, Rigby, Rupert, Sandpoint, Shelley (Eastern Idaho Regional Project), Soda Springs, St. Anthony, Twin Falls (Auger Hills), and Wendell. Other communities that meet the program criteria should be considered as funding allows. Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, Illinois.--The Committee has recommended $6,250,000 for construction on aquatic nuisance species Barriers I and II. McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, Illinois.--The Committee recommends $34,000,000 for continued construction of this project. Olmsted Locks and Dam, Ohio River, Illinois and Kentucky.-- The Committee recommends $114,000,000 to continue construction of this project. None of the funds provided for the Olmsted Locks and Dam Project or any other construction funds are to be used to reimburse the Claims and Judgment Fund. Indiana Harbor (Confined Disposal Facility), Indiana.--The Committee has retained funding for this project in the Construction, General account rather than moving it to the Operations and Maintenance account as proposed in the budget. Des Moines and Raccoon Rivers, Iowa.--The Committee recommendation includes $3,000,000 to complete preconstruction engineering and design and initiate construction of this flood control project. The plan includes reconstructing 13,600 feet of levees and associated facilities to provide improved flood protection to the Birdland Park and Central Place neighborhoods and modifications to 19 closure structures in the existing downtown Des Moines Federal levee system. Missouri Fish and Wildlife Recovery, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota.-- The Committee recommends $70,000,000 for this project. Within the recommended funds, $15,000,000 is to be used for modifications to the Intake Dam to provide additional habitat for the pallid sturgeon. To ensure that independent science guides Missouri River Recovery and its applications of adaptive Management and to ensure that the success of the recovery efforts are adequately measured and money wisely spent, the Committee directs that funds provided through Missouri River Recovery to the U.S. Geological Survey for science and monitoring should not be reduced below fiscal year 2007 levels. Turkey Creek, Kansas and Missouri.--The Committee recommendation includes $10,000,000 to continue construction of this project. Kentucky Lock and Dam, Tennessee River, Kentucky.--The Committee recommends $22,330,000 for continuation of the highway and railroad bridges superstructure contract. Funding deficits in the Inland Waterway Trust Fund prohibit the Committee from providing additional funds for the upstream lock excavation contract. The Committee recognizes that this is a critical path contract for the overall schedule. However, until the revenue stream for the Inland Waterway Trust Fund is enhanced, the Committee actions will be limited by available Trust Fund revenues. Markland Locks and Dam, Kentucky and Illinois.--The Committee has provided $10,600,000 for construction on this major rehabilitation requested by the administration. The Committee has provided these funds here rather than in O&M as proposed in the budget request. J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, Louisiana.--The Committee has recommended $8,500,000 for navigation channel refinement features, land purchases and development for mitigation of project impacts, and construction of project recreation and appurtenant features. Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.--The Committee has recommended $2,500,000 to continue efforts to provide 100-year flood protection for this project. Surveys show the levee grade is deficient by 12-18 inches. Louisiana Hurricane Protection System.--It is the Committee's understanding that the Corps has sufficient legal authority to afford credit for the lands, easements, rights-of- way, relocations, and disposal areas provided by the non- Federal sponsor for the Lake Ponchartrain and Vicinity, West Bank and Vicinity, and Southeast Louisiana projects that the Corps determines are necessary for such projects. Chesapeake Bay Environmental Program, Maryland, Pennsylvania and Virginia.--The Committee has recommended $2,500,000 for continuation of this project. Within the funds recommended, $328,000 is included to complete the environmental studies concerning non-native oysters. Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, Maryland and Virginia.--The Committee recommends $2,000,000 to continue oyster recovery efforts. Fort Peck Dam and Lake, Montana.--The Committee recommendation includes $1,500,000 for continuation of the disposition of Fort Peck cabins. Rural Montana, Montana.--The Committee recommends $5,000,000 for this project. Within the funds provided the Corps should give consideration to the following projects: County Water District of Billings Heights, Phase II Upgrade; Seeley Lake Water System Upgrade; Gildford Wastewater System Improvements; Daly Ditches Water; City of Shelby, Wastewater System Improvements; Muddy Cluster Water Line; Manhattan Water Project; Ten Mile Estates/Pleasant Valley Wastewater Improvements; Town of Stevensville, Water Improvement Project; Eureka Water Expansion; City of Troy, Water Project Phase II; Fort Belknap Water Treatment Plant; Crow Agency Wastewater Collection System Improvement Project; Columbia Falls Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements; City of Hamilton, Wastewater Facility Critical Upgrades; Bigfork County Water and Sewer District Wastewater Treatment Facilities Improvements; Bozeman Water Reclamation Facility Reconstruction; City of Helena, Missouri River Water Treatment Plant Reconstruction; City of Butte, Big Hole Drinking Water Supply Diversion Dam Replacement; City of Billings, Water Treatment Plant Improvements; Greater Woods Bay Wastewater Collection System; Homestead Acres Water and Sewer Well Acquisition; Manhattan Water improvements; Great Falls Upper/Lower River Road Water and Sewer District Improvements; Judith Gap Wastewater Improvements; Loma County Water Improvement Project; and Carter Water Improvement Project, Phase II. Sand Creek, Nebraska.--The Committee recommends $2,400,000 to complete construction of this project. Rural Nevada, Nevada.--The Committee recommendation provides $18,000,000 for this project. Within the funds provided the Corps should give consideration to projects at North Lemmon Valley; Spanish Springs Valley Phase II; Huffaker Hills Water Conservation; Lawton-Verdi; Boulder City; Lyon County; Gerlach; Searchlight; Incline Village; Esmeralda County; Cold Springs; Fallon; Goldfield; Churchill County; West Wendover; Yearington; Virgin Valley Water District; Lovelock; Truckee Meadows Water Authority; McGill-Ruth Consolidated Sewer and Water District; Carlin; Moapa; Indian Springs; Eldorado Valley; Ely and Carson City. Other communities that meet the program criteria should be considered as funding allows. Raritan River Basin, Green Brook Sub-basin, New Jersey.-- The Committee recommends $10,000,000 to continue construction of this project. The Committee notes that this area has been subject to frequent flooding with the latest flood occurring in 2007. The Committee urges the Corps to utilize available funds to expedite completion of this project. Barnegat Inlet to Little Egg Harbor, New Jersey.--The Committee recommends $11,700,000 for this shore protection project. Funds should be utilized for continuation of the beach fill project. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey.--The Committee recommends $2,000,000 to continue construction of this project. Acequias Irrigation System, New Mexico.--The Committee recommends $2,400,000 to continue restoration of these historic irrigation distribution systems. Middle Rio Grande Restoration, New Mexico.--The Committee recommendation includes $24,016,000 to continue environmental restoration efforts along the Rio Grande River within Bernalillo County. Lake Sakakawea, North Dakota.--The original health care facility for the Three Affiliated Tribes was permanently inundated due to the impoundment of Lake Sakakawea. A replacement healthcare facility was promised but never constructed. The Committee recommendation includes $17,048,000 for construction of the replacement health care facility. The Corps should work closely with the Indian Health Service and the Three Affiliated Tribes on the design and construction of this facility. The Committee suggests that the Corps utilize the expertise in their military programs office for this project. North Dakota [EI], North Dakota.--The Committee has recommended $10,000,000 for this program. $1,600,000 is for work related to the replacement of the Devils Lake Water supply pipeline and $8,400,000 is for the Parshall water project. Locks and Dams 2, 3, and 4, Monongahela River, Pennsylvania.--The Committee recommendation includes $19,050,000 to continue construction of this project. The reduction made to this project is a result of a continuing contract that the Corps chose not to award in fiscal year 2008 due to insufficient funds within the Inland Waterway Trust Fund. Not awarding the contract in fiscal year 2008, obviated the need for follow-on funding in fiscal year 2009 thus lowering the amount needed for this project in fiscal year 2009. Presque Isle, Pennsylvania.--The Committee recommends $1,000,000 to continue this project. Big Sioux River, South Dakota.--The Committee recommends $4,000,000 to continue construction of this project. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux, South Dakota.--The Committee notes that title IV of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999, Public Law 106-53 as amended, authorizes funding to pay administrative expenses, implementation of terrestrial wildlife restoration plans, activities associated with land transferred or to be transferred, and annual expenses for operating recreational areas. The Committee recommends $4,000,000 for this effort. Within the funds recommended, the Committee directs that not more than $1,000,000 shall be provided for administrative expenses, and that the Corps is to distribute the remaining funds as directed by title IV to the State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe. Chickamauga Lock, Tennessee.--The Committee recommends $42,000,000 to continue construction of this project. Central City, Fort Worth, Upper Trinity River Basin, Texas.--The Committee recommendation includes $500,000 for the Central City, Fort Worth, Texas, project. Red River Basin Chloride Control, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana.--The Committee recommends $1,500,000 to continue construction. San Antonio Channel Improvement, Texas.--The Committee recommendation includes $10,000,000 to continue this flood control project. Sims Bayou, Houston, Texas.--The Committee recommendation includes $21,465,000 for this project. The reduction made to this project should not be viewed as any diminution of support for this project, rather an attempt to balance out the Corps of Engineers nationwide program among the various missions of the Corps. Rural Utah, [EI], Utah.--The Committee recommendation includes $12,000,000 to continue construction of eligible projects. Burlington Harbor, Vermont.--The Committee recommends $500,000 to continue work on removal of oil bollards in the harbor. Lake Champlain Watershed Initiative.--The Committee recommendation includes $2,000,000 for continuation of this project. Columbia River Fish Mitigation, Washington, Oregon, and Idaho.--The Committee has chosen not to follow the budget proposal to include this work within the various O&M items in the system. The Committee believes that it is prudent to maintain visibility of the costs of environmental compliance activities for this project and have included funding in this account in this line item. $92,000,000 is recommended for this project. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Washington and Oregon.--The Committee recommends no funding for this new start recommended by the administration in the O&M account. The Committee believes it to be imprudent to initiate the major rehabilitation report that would be cost shared in the Inland Waterway Trust Fund when construction work has to be curtailed due to the funding shortfalls in the Inland Harbor Trust Fund. The Committee believes this project should not be initiated until the revenues have been enhanced for the Inland Waterway Trust Fund. Mud Mountain, Washington.--The Corps has recommended $1,000,000 for fish passage at this project. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, West Virginia, Kentucky and Virginia.--The Committee recommends $16,500,000 for the continuation of the project. Within the funds recommended, the Committee recommendation includes $8,000,000 for the Buchanan County, Dickenson County, and Grundy, Virginia elements. Further, the recommendation includes $8,500,000 for Kermit, Lower Mingo County, McDowell County, Upper Mingo and Wayne County, West Virginia. Aquatic Plant Control Program.--The Committee recommendation includes $4,550,000 for this program. Funds above the budget request are included for cost-shared programs for Lake Gaston, North Carolina; Lake Champlain, Vermont; and Lake Chautauqua, New York. Actions for Change to Improve Construction.--The Committee did not recommend funding for this item. The Committee believes that the activities proposed in the budget request for this line item should be incorporated into the various funded construction activities that the Corps has underway. Dredged Material Disposal Facilities Program.--The Committee has retained this program in the Construction, General account rather than the Operations and Maintenance account as proposed by the budget. Shore Line Erosion Control Development and Demonstration Program.--The Committee has recommended $875,000 to be used along with prior year funds for an innovative approach to storm damage reduction at Sacred Falls Beach Park, Hawaii, by restoring and maintaining a pocket beach with an innovative sediment retaining structure. Ability to Pay.--Section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Public Law 99-662, as amended, requires that all project cooperation agreements for flood damage reduction projects, to which non-Federal cost sharing applies, will be subject to the ability of non-Federal sponsors to pay their shares. Congress included this section in the landmark 1986 act to ensure that as many communities as possible would qualify for Federal flood damage reduction projects, based more on needs and less on financial capabilities. The Secretary published eligibility criteria in 33 CFR 241, which requires a non-Federal sponsor to meet an ability-to-pay test. However, the Committee believes that the Secretary's test is too restrictive and operates to exclude most communities from qualifying for relief under the ability-to-pay provision. For example, 33 CFR 241.4(f) specifies that the test should be structured so that reductions in the level of cost sharing will be granted in ``only a limited number of cases of severe economic hardship,'' and should depend not only on the economic circumstances within a project area, but also on the conditions of the State in which the project area is located. CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM When Congress authorized the initial Continuing Authorities in the 1940s and 1950s, they were envisioned to provide a small pool of money available to the Corps of Engineers to solve very small localized problems without being encumbered by the longer study and project authorization process. As more programs were added to the Continuing Authorities Program [CAP] they became increasingly popular with congressional Members and the public. More and more congressionally directed projects began to appear in the annual appropriations bills. At first these congressionally directed projects were added to the base program. As more and more of these congressionally directed projects came into the program it became difficult for these congressionally directed projects to be added to the base, and as such, the base program began to shrink. Congressionally directed projects now dominate all sections of the CAP Program. Congressionally directed projects have proliferated to such an extent that several of the sections are over-subscribed. The table below shows the Federal obligations, the allocations through fiscal year 2008, the balance to complete, and the annual statutory limit for each section of the program. With roughly a $1,000,000,000 backlog and appropriations averaging $120,000,000, depending on the section of the program it could be from two to ten years before all of the current projects in the program are completed. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Allocations Planned fiscal CAP section Federal through fiscal year 2008 Balance to Statutory limit obligation year 2008 allocations complete -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14............................................................ $69,548,012 $38,328,057 $9,707,357 $21,512,598 $15,000 103........................................................... 48,386,819 15,522,875 4,451,555 28,322,389 30,000 107........................................................... 118,598,140 38,181,184 7,232,400 73,184,556 35,000 111........................................................... 50,283,000 3,574,645 1,919,000 44,789,355 (\1\) 204........................................................... 35,317,018 7,398,318 1,373,000 26,545,700 15,000 205........................................................... 548,772,450 162,448,027 42,370,804 343,953,619 55,000 206........................................................... 457,038,102 120,987,115 29,149,778 306,901,210 50,000 208........................................................... 1,349,900 713,899 ................ 636,001 7,500 1135.......................................................... 267,193,752 117,611,141 29,174,000 120,408,611 40,000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Totals.................................................. 1,596,487,193 504,765,261 125,467,894 966,254,038 ................ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\Not Applicable The budget justifications for the CAP program do not provide much useful information as to how the administration developed its program for fiscal year 2009. There is a dollar value associated with each section and a listing of projects in priority order that corresponds to the amount. However, the Committee has no way of knowing whether the amount shown is adequate. The Corps is directed to provide more information to justify the amount shown on the justification sheets for fiscal year 2010. Starting in fiscal year 2008 the Committee no longer provided any congressional earmarks for the section 14, Emergency Bank Stabilization authority. The Committee has not provided either the administration's earmark requests for this section or requests by Members for fiscal year 2009. By definition these are projects that are estimated to fail within 9-12 months. As an emergency situation the Chief of Engineers should have the responsibility for determining how these funds are expended in the most efficient and effective manner. Budget justifications for this section should display the anticipated projects and associated costs to be undertaken in the budget year as well as the anticipated resources necessary to address emergencies that arise in the budget year. CAP projects and studies are listed in the Construction, General table immediately preceding this section. This listing includes the priority projects listed in the President's budget request as well as those that were requested by Members. With one exception, the Committee has not provided dollar amounts for the named projects in the report. This lack of specificity in project amounts is intended to give the Chief of Engineers flexibility within the various sections of the CAP program in order to address the backlog. The Committee has repeated the guidance below from the fiscal year 2008 statement of the managers that accompanied Public Law 110-161 detailing how the Corps should prioritize work in the CAP program. Priorities for Design and Implementation [D&I] Phase: 1. D&I work for continuing projects that have executed PCAs. 2. D&I funding for projects approved by Corps Headquarters to execute a PCA. 3. D&I work which does not require executed agreements (for example continuing or pre-PCA design) for ongoing projects. 4. D&I funding for projects with approved Feasibility Reports moving into D&I. Priorities for Feasibility Phase: 1. Feasibility phase funding for projects with executed FCSAs. 2. Feasibility phase funding for projects approved by Corps Headquarters to execute a FCSA. 3. Feasibility phase work which does not require a FCSA for ongoing projects. 4. Feasibility phase funding for initiations or restarts. Within the last-funded priority level within the D&I and Feasibility phases, if the projects qualifying for funding exceed the available funding, funds shall be allocated based on project outputs and the non-Federal sponsor's ability to meet local obligations. Remaining funds, if any, may be allocated to additional projects in accordance with the aforementioned priorities, except that remaining funds for section 14 projects shall be allocated to the most urgently needed projects. The Committee is concerned that if the Corps adhered strictly to the priorities above, that all funding would be exhausted for construction. Therefore, in order to provide a mix of studies, design and construction within each CAP section the Committee directs that funding be generally divided 80/20 between the D&I phase and the Feasibility phase within each authority. The Chief of Engineers should provide a report to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees within 30 days of enactment of this bill detailing how funds will be distributed to the individual items in the various CAP sections for the fiscal year. The Chief should also provide an annual report at the end of each fiscal year detailing the progress made on the backlog of projects. The report should include the completions and terminations as well as progress of ongoing work. Even though the Committee is providing a listing of projects that are of interest, the Corps should develop the program based on all of the projects in each section whether named in this report or not. Priorities should be based on the factors outlined above. The Corps is directed not to initiate any new continuing authorities projects in sections 205, 206 or section 1135 without explicit congressional direction. New projects may be initiated in the remaining sections after an assessment is made that such projects can be funded over time based on historical averages of the appropriation for that section and approval by the House and Senate Committees on Appropriation. FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ARKANSAS, ILLINOIS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, AND TENNESSEE Appropriations, 2008.................................... $387,402,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 240,000,000 Committee recommendation................................ 365,000,000 This appropriation funds planning, construction, and operation and maintenance activities associated with water resource projects located in the lower Mississippi River Valley from Cape Girardeau, Missouri to the Gulf of Mexico. The Committee wishes to reiterate that MR&T project is a good model for the Corps to examine for moving towards a watershed approach. The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are shown on the following table: MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES [In thousands of dollars] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fiscal year Fiscal year Project title 2009 budget 2009 request recommendation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ IINVESTIGATIONS BAYOU METO BASIN, AR.................... .............. 43 SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS, AR.................. .............. 400 ALEXANDRIA TO THE GULF, LA.............. 790 790 MORGANZA TO THE GULF, LA................ .............. 6,000 SPRING BAYOU, LA........................ .............. 300 COLDWATER RIVER BASIN BELOW ARKABUTLA 125 130 LAKE, MS............................... QUIVER RIVER, MS........................ .............. 250 MEMPHIS METRO AREA, STORM WATER MGMT 34 34 STUDY, TN.............................. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA...... 400 1,430 CONSTRUCTION CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, .............. 50,200 MO & TN................................ CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, DIKES, AR, IL, KY, 12,134 .............. LA, MS, MO & TN........................ CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, REVETMENT 33,089 .............. OPERATIONS, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN GRAND PRAIRIE REGION, AR................ .............. 9,000 MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, 20,000 63,823 LA, MS, MO & TN........................ ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR & .............. 5,700 MO..................................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA.. 2,025 2,025 ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA................... 6,300 15,500 MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA............ 2,259 3,933 YAZOO BASIN--BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS.... .............. 2,275 YAZOO BASIN--DELTA HEADWATERS PROJECT, .............. 18,000 MS..................................... YAZOO BASIN--MAIN STEM, MS.............. .............. 25 YAZOO BASIN--REFORMULATION UNIT, MS..... .............. 2,800 YAZOO BASIN--UPPER YAZOO PROJECTS, MS... .............. 14,000 YAZOO BASIN, BACKWATER LESS ROCKY BAYOU. .............. 50 YAZOO BASIN--YAZOO BACKWATER, MS........ .............. 5,000 ST. JOHNS BAYOU AND NEW MADRID FLOODWAY, .............. 200 MO..................................... OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, 65,211 70,000 MO & TN................................ HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR...... 128 128 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR....... 249 249 LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK, AR.... 256 256 LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR.... 161 161 MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, 15,873 16,368 LA, MS, MO & TN........................ ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO.............. 4,445 8,200 TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS RIVERS, 1,880 1,880 AR & LA................................ WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR............... 1,039 1,000 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL....... 135 135 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY....... 93 93 HICKMAN/MAGNOLIA BLUFF, KY.............. .............. 60 ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA.. 2,117 2,117 ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA................... 8,619 8,619 BATON ROUGE HARBOR, DEVIL SWAMP, LA..... 162 162 BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA...... 42 42 BONNET CARRE, LA........................ 2,346 2,346 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA....... 1,727 1,927 LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK LEVEES, LA.. 53 53 MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA............ 578 578 OLD RIVER, LA........................... 13,882 13,882 TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA... 2,501 2,501 GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS................... 436 436 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS....... 101 101 VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS.................... 424 424 YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS......... 6,228 6,673 YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS.... 171 1,500 YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS.............. 6,388 7,417 YAZOO BASIN, GREENWOOD, MS.............. 1,650 1,650 YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS........... 6,201 7,166 YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS.............. 1,128 2,237 YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS............ 6,971 8,916 YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS............ 694 925 YAZOO BASIN, WILL M WHITTINGTON AUX 272 285 CHAN, MS............................... YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, MS... 393 442 YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO CITY, MS............. 634 534 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO....... 185 185 WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO..................... 4,567 4,567 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN....... 81 81 MEMPHIS HARBOR, MCKELLAR LAKE, TN....... 3,283 3,283 MAPPING................................. 1,488 1,488 ANTICIPATED REDUCTION FOR SAVINGS AND .............. (15,975) SLIPPAGE............................... ADJUSTMENTS............................. 52 .............. ------------------------------- TOTAL............................. 240,000 365,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ General Investigations Morganza to the Gulf, Louisiana.--The Committee has recommended $6,000,000 to continue Preconstruction Engineering and Design for this project. The Committee has included legislative language which allows the local interest to construct the Houma Navigation Canal Lock with non-Federal funds. This shall not be considered initiation of the Federal project. The Committee is aware that substantial environmental analysis has been conducted on the Houma Navigation Canal Lock as well as the other portions of the Morganza alignment. Furthermore, the Committee is aware of significant engineering work that is underway using both Federal and non-Federal funding. Accordingly, the Committee urges the Corps to resolve any permitting issues that may develop as a result of non- Federal spending, as expeditiously as possible. Finally, the Committee remains sensitive to the critical need for hurricane and flood protection in the Terrebonne and Lafourche Parish area of Louisiana, and is providing this flexibility to allow the local sponsors to move forward on components while further reviews are taking place on the larger project. Quiver River, Mississippi.--The Committee has recommended $250,000 to initiate studies to identify options for improving water quality while addressing other needs Collection and Study of Basic Data.--The Committee recommends an additional $1,000,000 for Lidar mapping in the Yazoo River Basin. Construction Grand Prairie, Arkansas.--The Committee has recommended $9,000,000 for continued construction of the project. Mississippi River Levees, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Tennessee.--Additional funds above the budget request could be used for the following activities: relief wells (parcel 1) at Delta, Mississippi; relief wells at Wilson, Arkansas; relief wells at Barfield, Arkansas; relief wells at Tunica, Mississippi; relief wells (parcel 2) at Delta, Mississippi; engineering and design work for levee construction work at three sites in Missouri; engineering and design work for levee construction work at two sites in Arkansas; engineering and design for construction work near Cairo, Illinois; acquisition of mitigation lands; to continue construction on the MRL features of the St. Johns Bayou-New Madrid Floodway; fund Magna Vista-Brunswick, Mississippi, Item 468-L; Bayou Vidal-Elkridge, Louisiana, Item 419-R; Bayou Vidal-Elkridge, Louisiana, Item 416-R; Magna Vista-Brunswick, Mississippi, Item 465-L; advance completion of levee enlargement; concrete slope paving contract; slope stability contract; and complete the LMRMRIS. Yazoo Basin, Backwater Pumping Plant, Mississippi.--The Committee has recommended $5,000,000 to fully fund pump and motor contracts and initiate purchase of conservation easements. Funds are also provided for the center associated with the Theodore Roosevelt National Wildlife Refuge. Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower Basin, Mississippi.--The Committee recognizes the need for control of bank erosion along the Big Sunflower River and has recommended $2,275,000 for the continued construction of the Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River Project. $1,500,000 is recommended to continue bank stabilization erosion repairs at selected sites in the Sunflower Basin. Yazoo Basin, Delta Headwaters Project, Mississippi.--The Committee has recommended $18,000,000 to continue construction of this erosion protection projects in the Yazoo Basin. Yazoo Basin, Upper Yazoo Project, Mississippi.--The Committee has recommended $14,000,000 to continue construction of this flood control project. The Committee regrets that budgetary constraints do not allow funding at a more optimal level. Additional non-defense discretionary budgetary resources will be needed in future years if the project is to proceed at or near the Corps' schedule. Maintenance Hickman/Magnolia Bluff, Kentucky.--The Committee recommends $60,000 to prepare plans and specifications and to repair damage to the maintenance access road and a concrete-lined drainage ditch caused by a September 2006 flood. Mississippi River Levees, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Tennessee.--Funds provided above the budget request are to provide gravel surfacing to selected locations along roads on top of levees in Arkansas, Mississippi, and Louisiana to ensure all weather access for flood fights and for other backlog maintenance. Mississippi Lakes.--The Committee has recommended additional funding to address the maintenance backlog at Arkabutla, Sardis, Enid and Grenada Lakes in Mississippi. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, GENERAL Appropriations, 2008.................................... $2,243,637,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 2,475,000,000 Committee recommendation................................ 2,220,000,000 This appropriation funds operation, maintenance, and related activities at the water resources projects that the Corps operates and maintains. Work to be accomplished consists of dredging, repair, and operation of structures and other facilities, as authorized in the various River and Harbor, Flood Control, and Water Resources Development Acts. Related activities include aquatic plant control, monitoring of completed projects where appropriate, removal of sunken vessels, and the collection of domestic waterborne commerce statistics. The Committee continues to believe that it is essential to provide adequate resources and attention to operation and maintenance requirements in order to protect the large Federal investment. In order to cope with the current fiscal situation, the Corps has had to defer or delay scheduled maintenance activities. The O&M budget request appears to have been increased by nearly $231,363,000 above the fiscal year 2008 enacted amount. However this is very misleading. Shifting of projects from the CG account to the O&M account totals $264,775,000. Once these projects are shifted back to CG, that leaves a decrease of $33,412,000 when compared to fiscal year 2008. The Committee notes that the Corps maintenance backlog is more than $1,000,000,000 and increases by about $100,000,000 annually as the inventory of projects ages. The Committee has chosen to display the budget request as the discrete projects that are the tradition as opposed to the regional budget proposed by the administration. Also the Committee has chosen to migrate the projects that the administration proposed in O&M back to their traditional location in the CG account. This makes the actual budget request for O&M $2,210,225,000 rather than $2,475,000,000 as presented in the budget. A list of these migrated projects is displayed under the CG heading earlier in this report. Maintenance of our aging water infrastructure inventory gets more expensive every year, however, it is consistently underfunded. If this trend continues, the Corps will not be able to maintain expected levels of service at all of its projects. The Committee has maintained its tradition of supporting what the budget request terms as ``low use harbors and waterways''. The Committee recognizes the importance of these facilities and will continue to provide funding for them. Unfortunately due to budget constraints the Committee was not able to provide nearly enough funding as is needed for our aging infrastructure. CORPS OF ENGINEERS--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE [In thousands of dollars] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Committee Project title Budget estimate recommendation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ALABAMA ALABAMA--COOSA COMPREHENSIVE WATER 375 375 STUDY, AL............................ ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL............... 15,672 15,672 BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL 22,191 22,191 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, AL........ 5,230 5,230 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AL..... 60 60 MOBILE HARBOR, AL..................... 21,562 21,562 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AL......... 100 100 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AL... 94 94 TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE 2,350 2,350 MITIGATION, AL....................... TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL & MS. 22,009 22,009 WALTER F GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL & GA. 8,417 8,417 WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, AL. 120 120 ALASKA ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK.................. 17,601 17,601 CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK................. 2,225 2,225 DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK................. 840 840 HOMER HARBOR, AK...................... 620 620 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AK..... 1,058 1,058 LOWELL CREEK TUNNEL, AK............... ............... 500 NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK.................. 350 350 NOME HARBOR, AK....................... 780 780 PETERSBERG NORTH HARBOR PROJECT, AK... ............... 500 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK......... 550 550 ARIZONA ALAMO LAKE, AZ........................ 1,585 1,585 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AZ..... 98 98 PAINTED ROCK DAM, AZ.................. 1,206 1,206 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AZ... 39 39 WHITLOW RANCH DAM, AZ................. 171 171 ARKANSAS BEAVER LAKE, AR....................... 5,270 5,270 BLAKELY MT DAM, LAKE OUACHITA, AR..... 8,384 8,384 BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR................ 1,427 1,427 BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR.................. 7,367 7,367 DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM, AR........... 8,491 8,491 DEGRAY LAKE, AR....................... 6,317 6,317 DEQUEEN LAKE, AR...................... 1,286 1,286 DIERKS LAKE, AR....................... 1,354 1,354 GILLHAM LAKE, AR...................... 1,156 1,156 GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR................. 6,861 6,861 HELENA HARBOR, AR..................... 90 400 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR..... 508 508 MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER 28,395 28,395 NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AR................ MILLWOOD LAKE, AR..................... 2,074 2,074 NARROWS DAM, LAKE GREESON, AR......... 4,591 4,591 NIMROD LAKE, AR....................... 1,609 1,609 NORFORK LAKE, AR...................... 3,920 3,920 OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR.................... 14 500 OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR & LA.... 8,509 8,509 OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM, AR.... 5,287 5,287 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AR......... 8 8 WHITE RIVER, AR....................... 52 52 YELLOW BEND PORT, AR.................. 3 160 CALIFORNIA BLACK BUTTE LAKE, CA.................. 1,954 1,954 BUCHANAN DAM, HV EASTMAN LAKE, CA..... 1,820 1,820 CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA............ 5,360 5,360 COYOTE VALLEY DAM, LAKE MENDOCINO, CA. 3,384 3,384 DANA POINT HARBOR, CA................. ............... 700 DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE AND 5,067 5,067 CHANNEL, CA.......................... FARMINGTON DAM, CA.................... 443 443 HIDDEN DAM, HENSLEY LAKE, CA.......... 1,786 1,786 HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CA........... 5,144 5,144 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CA..... 3,822 3,822 ISABELLA LAKE, CA..................... 1,404 1,404 LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA.. 3,996 3,996 MARINA DEL REY, CA.................... 2,499 2,499 MARTIS CREEK LAKE, CA & NV............ 737 737 MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA............. 239 239 MOJAVE RIVER DAM, CA.................. 285 285 MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA.................. 1,630 1,630 NEW HOGAN LAKE, CA.................... 2,115 2,115 NEW MELONES LAKE, DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL, 1,730 1,730 CA................................... NOYO HARBOR, CA....................... ............... 750 OAKLAND HARBOR, CA.................... 7,445 7,445 OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA.................. 1,620 1,620 PINE FLAT LAKE, CA.................... 2,854 2,854 PINOLE SHOAL MANAGEMENT STUDY, CA..... ............... 500 PORT HUENEME, CA...................... 4,029 4,029 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CA......... 2,422 2,422 RICHMOND HARBOR, CA................... 6,950 6,950 SACRAMENTO RIVER (30-FOOT PROJECT), CA 5,582 5,582 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES 1,566 1,566 (DEBRIS CONTROL), CA................. SACRAMENTO RIVER SHALLOW DRAFT 175 175 CHANNEL, CA.......................... SAN FRANCISCO BAY, DELTA MODEL 1,106 1,106 STRUCTURE, CA........................ SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY, CA 2,805 2,805 (DRIFT REMOVAL)...................... SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA.............. 2,514 2,514 SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, PORT OF STOCKTON, 5,411 5,411 CA................................... SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, 1,140 1,140 CA................................... SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA............. 3,148 3,148 SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA.............. 2,090 2,090 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CA... 1,639 1,639 SUCCESS LAKE, CA...................... 1,791 1,791 SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA................ 2,982 2,982 TERMINUS DAM, LAKE KAWEAH, CA......... 1,912 1,912 VENTURA HARBOR, CA.................... 3,095 3,095 YUBA RIVER, CA........................ 129 129 COLORADO BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO................... 332 332 CHATFIELD LAKE, CO.................... 1,176 1,509 CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO................. 870 1,203 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CO..... 457 457 JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO............. 2,418 2,418 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CO... 720 720 TRINIDAD LAKE, CO..................... 956 1,290 CONNECTICUT BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT................... 416 416 BRIDGEPORT HARBOR DREDGING, CT........ ............... 2,000 COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT.............. 547 547 HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT................ 338 338 HOP BROOK LAKE, CT.................... 919 919 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CT..... 316 316 LONG ISLAND SOUND DMMP, CT............ 1,000 1,000 MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT............. 493 493 NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT............. 385 385 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CT......... 1,100 1,100 STAMFORD HURRICANE BARRIER, CT........ 374 374 THOMASTON DAM, CT..................... 615 615 WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT................ 568 568 DELAWARE DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, ROOSEVELT 350 ............... INLET TO LEWES\1\.................... HARBOR OF REFUGE, LEWES, DE........... ............... 500 INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, SUSSEX ............... 500 COUNTY, DE........................... INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE R TO 14,065 14,065 CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE................... INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO 40 40 DELAWARE BAY, DE..................... MISPILLION RIVER, DE.................. 30 500 MURDERKILL RIVER, DE.................. 30 30 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DE......... 147 147 WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE................. 2,750 3,750 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DC..... 62 62 POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC 805 805 (DRIFT REMOVAL)...................... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DC......... 28 28 WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC................. 25 25 FLORIDA CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL.................. 4,404 4,404 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL...... 13,234 13,234 ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FL....... 25 25 EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM 400 400 RESTORATION, FL...................... FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL................. 2,025 2,025 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, FL..... 300 300 INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE ............... 1,000 R TO ANCLOTE R,...................... INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO 325 2,500 MIAMI, FL............................ JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL............... 6,000 6,000 JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, LAKE 9,165 9,165 SEMINOLE, FL, AL & GA................ MANATEE HARBOR, FL.................... 2,675 2,675 MIAMI RIVER, FL....................... 10,820 10,820 OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL............... 4,530 4,530 PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL................. 2,385 2,385 PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL................ 55 55 PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL.................. 67 67 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, FL......... 1,265 1,265 REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL......... 4,420 4,420 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, FL... 30 30 SOUTH FLORIDA EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM 357 357 RESTORATION, FL...................... TAMPA HARBOR, FL...................... 4,550 4,550 WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, FL. 405 405 GEORGIA ALLATOONA LAKE, GA.................... 6,016 6,016 APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT 3,418 3,418 RIVERS, GA, AL &..................... ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, GA.... 257 1,000 BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA.................. 5,545 5,545 BUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA. 7,946 7,946 CARTERS DAM AND LAKE, GA.............. 7,703 7,703 HARTWELL LAKE, GA & SC................ 12,188 12,188 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 63 63 PROJECTS, GA......................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, GA..... 142 142 J. STROM THURMOND LAKE, GA & SC....... 11,066 11,066 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, GA......... 162 162 RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & 8,386 8,386 SC................................... SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA\1\................ 19,170 13,895 SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA...... 183 183 WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, GA & AL...... 7,446 7,446 HAWAII BARBERS POINT HARBOR, HI.............. 200 548 HALEIWA HARBOR, OAHU, HI.............. ............... 1,000 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI..... 659 659 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, HI......... 537 537 WAIANAE HARBOR, HI.................... ............... 1,000 IDAHO ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID.................. 1,539 1,539 DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID........ 2,404 2,404 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ID..... 354 334 LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID................... 1,801 1,801 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ID... 469 469 ILLINOIS CHICAGO HARBOR, IL.................... 2,015 2,015 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL..... 44 ............... CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL & IN..... 4,780 4,780 CARLYLE LAKE, IL...................... 4,155 4,155 CHICAGO RIVER, IL..................... 475 475 FARM CREEK RESERVOIRS, IL............. 203 203 ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVR PORTION), IL & 38,121 36,287 IN................................... GRAFTON, IL TO LAGRANGE LOCK & DAM (1,834) ............... ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVS PORTION), IL & ............... 1,834 IN................................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 65 65 PROJECTS, IL......................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL..... 2,298 2,342 KASKASKIA RIVER NAVIGATION, IL........ 1,903 1,903 LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, IL........... 860 860 LAKE SHELBYVILLE, IL.................. 4,761 4,761 LOCK AND DAM 27, MISSISSIPPI RVR, IL 2,598 ............... (MAJOR REHAB)\1\..................... MISS RIVER BTWN MO RIVER AND 63,207 63,207 MINNEAPOLIS (MVR PORTION)............ PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IL......... 111 111 REND LAKE, IL......................... 4,570 4,570 SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 565 565 WATERS, IL........................... WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL................... 1,099 1,099 MISS RIVER BTWN MO RIVER AND 20,004 20,004 MINNEAPOLIS (MVS PORTION)............ INDIANA BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN................... 1,649 1,649 BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN............. 160 160 CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN.................. 2,053 2,053 CECIL M HARDEN LAKE, IN............... 1,226 1,226 INDIANA HARBOR, CONFINED DISPOSAL 8,385 ............... FACILITY, IN\1\...................... INDIANA HARBOR, IN.................... 3,138 3,138 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IN..... 635 635 J. EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN.............. 2,842 2,842 MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN................. 1,051 1,051 MONROE LAKE, IN....................... 1,326 1,326 PATOKA LAKE, IN....................... 1,150 1,150 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IN......... 185 185 ROUSH RIVER MAJOR REHAB PROJECT, IN... 300 300 SALAMONIE LAKE, IN.................... 1,226 1,226 SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 91 91 WATERS, IN........................... IOWA CORALVILLE LAKE, IA................... 2,887 2,887 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA..... 466 ............... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA..... 717 1,183 LOCK AND DAM 11, MISSISSIPPI RVR, IA 2,750 <bullet> (MAJOR REHAB)\1\..................... MISSOURI RIVER--KENSLERS BEND, NE TO 166 166 SIOUX CITY, IA....................... MISSOURI RIVER--RULO TO MOUTH, IA, KS, 5,106 5,106 MO & NE.............................. MISSOURI RIVER--SIOUX CITY TO THE 2,560 2,560 MOUTH, IA, KS, MO & NE............... MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE 85,000 ............... RECOVERY, IA, KS, MO\1\.............. RATHBUN LAKE, IA...................... 2,214 2,277 RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA.... 3,278 3,278 SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA.................. 3,908 3,908 KANSAS CLINTON LAKE, KS...................... 1,975 2,042 COUNCIL GRAVE LAKE, KS................ 1,328 1,328 EL DORADO LAKE, KS.................... 569 569 ELK CITY LAKE, KS..................... 734 734 FALL RIVER LAKE, KS................... 1,284 1,284 HILLSDALE LAKE, KS.................... 722 764 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KS..... 177 177 JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS.... 1,042 1,042 KANOPOLIS LAKE, KS.................... 1,330 1,418 MARION LAKE, KS....................... 1,504 1,504 MELVERN LAKE, KS...................... 2,035 2,111 MILFORD LAKE, KS...................... 2,076 2,133 PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS..... 1,048 1,048 PERRY LAKE, KS........................ 2,452 2,516 POMONA LAKE, KS....................... 1,914 1,969 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, KS... 30 30 TORONTO LAKE, KS...................... 535 535 TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS................. 2,060 2,135 WILSON LAKE, KS....................... 1,577 1,977 KENTUCKY BARKLEY DAM AND LAKE BARKLEY, KY & TN. 10,255 10,255 BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY................. 3,969 5,969 BIG SANDY HARBOR, KY.................. 1,250 1,250 BUCKHORN LAKE, KY..................... 2,433 2,433 CARR CREEK LAKE, KY................... 1,797 1,797 CAVE RUN LAKE, KY..................... 1,098 1,098 DEWEY LAKE, KY........................ 1,768 1,768 ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY...... 25 25 FISHTRAP LAKE, KY..................... 1,830 1,830 GRAYSON LAKE, KY...................... 1,445 1,445 GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY........... 2,698 3,698 GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY.................. 4,942 4,942 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY..... 554 554 KENTUCKY RIVER, KY.................... 10 10 LAUREL RIVER LAKE, KY................. 1,748 1,748 MARKLAND LOCKS AND DAM, KY & IN (MAJOR 10,600 ............... REHAB) \1\........................... MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY................. 1,062 1,062 MIDDLESBORO CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY 102 102 NOLIN LAKE, KY........................ 3,337 3,337 OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, KY, IL, IN 39,419 39,419 & OH................................. OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, KY, IL, 4,485 4,485 IN & OH.............................. PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY.................. 954 954 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, KY......... 7 7 ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY.................. 2,832 2,832 TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY................. 1,312 1,312 WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY... 7,834 7,834 YATESVILLE LAKE, KY................... 1,180 1,180 LOUISIANA ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, 8,993 8,993 BOEUF AND BLACK, L................... BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA............ 926 926 BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA............ 809 809 BAYOU LACOMBE, LA..................... ............... 450 BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE JUMP 724 724 WATERWAY, LA......................... BAYOU PIERRE, LA...................... 18 18 BAYOU SEGNETTE WATERWAY, LA........... 321 321 BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER, LA... 14 14 BAYOU TECHE, LA....................... 209 209 CADDO LAKE, LA........................ 181 181 CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA.......... 14,968 14,968 FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA.................. 1,848 1,848 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA........ 17,769 17,769 HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA............ 662 1,000 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA..... 1,814 1,814 J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA...... 10,555 10,555 LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA............ 17 440 MADISON PARISH PORT, LA............... 5 85 MERMENTAU RIVER, LA................... 1,969 1,969 MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE, 3,136 3,136 LA................................... MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO THE 55,325 55,325 GULF OF MEXICO,...................... REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA......... 1,500 1,500 TANGIPAHOA RIVER, LA.................. ............... 321 TCHEFUNCTE RIVER & BOGUE FALIA, LA.... ............... 400 WALLACE LAKE, LA...................... 200 200 WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE TO THE GULF, LA.. 32 500 WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO 239 500 BAYOU DULAC, LA...................... MAINE DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING, ME.......... 1,200 1,200 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ME..... 29 29 NARRAGUAGUS RIVER, ME................. ............... 600 PORTLAND HARBOR, ME................... 100 100 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, ME......... 750 750 SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 17 17 WATERS, ME........................... MARYLAND ASSATEAGUE, MD\1\..................... 500 ............... BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (50- 16,193 16,193 FOOT), MD............................ BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD (DRIFT REMOVAL).. 338 338 CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV....... 98 98 HERRING BAY AND ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD.... ............... 500 HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY, MD........... ............... 500 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MD..... 89 89 JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV....... 1,713 1,713 OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND 450 450 SINEPUXENT BAY, MD................... PARISH CREEK, MD...................... ............... 500 POPLAR ISLAND, MD\1\.................. 9,185 ............... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MD......... 376 376 RHODES POINT TO TYLERTON, MD.......... ............... 500 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MD... 64 64 TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE RIVER, 135 135 MD................................... WICOMICO RIVER, MD.................... 1,400 1,400 MASSACHUSETTS BARRE FALLS DAM, MA................... 580 580 BIRCH HILL DAM, MA.................... 574 574 BOSTON HARBOR, MA..................... 6,000 6,000 BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA.................. 515 515 CAPE COD CANAL, MA.................... 11,546 11,546 CHARLES RIVER NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE 291 291 AREA, MA............................. CONANT BROOK LAKE, MA................. 232 232 EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA............... 398 398 HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA................ 503 503 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MA..... 381 381 KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA................... 526 526 LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA.................. 489 489 NEW BEDFORD FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET 272 372 HURRICANE BARRIER,................... NEW BEDFORD AND FAIRHAVEN HARBOR, MA.. ............... 250 NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA................ ............... 400 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MA......... 1,200 1,200 TULLY LAKE, MA........................ 543 543 WEST HILL DAM, MA..................... 674 674 WESTVILLE LAKE, MA.................... 497 497 MICHIGAN ALPENA HARBOR, MI..................... ............... ............... ARCADIA HARBOR, MI.................... ............... ............... AU SABLE, MI.......................... ............... ............... BAY PORT HARBOR, MI................... ............... ............... BIG BAY HARBOR, MI.................... ............... ............... BLACK RIVER (GOGEBIC), MI............. ............... ............... CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI.................. ............... ............... CHANNELS IN LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI........ 156 156 CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI................. 197 197 CLINTON RIVER, MI..................... ............... ............... DETROIT RIVER, MI..................... 5,327 5,327 FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI.................. ............... ............... GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI................ 1,312 1,312 GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI............... ............... ............... GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI......... ............... ............... GRAYS REEF PASSAGE, MI................ 180 180 HOLLAND HARBOR, MI.................... 588 588 INLAND ROUTE, MI...................... ............... ............... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MI..... 230 230 KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI................. 86 86 LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI............... ............... ............... LELAND HARBOR, MI..................... ............... ............... LES CHENEAUX ISLAND CHANNELS, MI...... ............... ............... LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI.................. ............... ............... LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI................ ............... ............... LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI.................. 442 442 MANISTEE HARBOR, MI................... ............... ............... MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI................. ............... ............... MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI.................. ............... ............... MENOMINEE HARBOR, MI.................. ............... ............... MICHIGAN HARBOR DREDGING, MI.......... ............... 5,000 MONROE HARBOR, MI..................... 1,018 1,018 MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI................... 350 350 NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI................ ............... ............... ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI.................. 655 655 PENTWATER HARBOR, MI.................. ............... ............... PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI................... ............... ............... POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR, MI.............. ............... ............... PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI................ ............... ............... PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI............... ............... ............... PORTAGE HARBOR, MI.................... ............... ............... PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI............... 312 312 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MI......... 276 276 ROUGE RIVER, MI\1\.................... 1,321 1,161 SAGINAW RIVER, MI..................... 3,798 3,798 SAUGATUCK HARBOR, MI.................. ............... ............... SEBEWAING RIVER, MI................... 75 75 SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI................ ............... ............... ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI................... 1,791 1,791 ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI................. 595 595 ST. MARYS RIVER, MI................... 18,836 18,836 SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 2,444 2,444 WATERS, MI........................... WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI................. ............... ............... MINNESOTA BIGSTONE LAKE--WHETSTONE RIVER, MN & 172 172 SD................................... DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN & WI....... 4,929 4,929 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MN..... 623 623 LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, 431 431 MN................................... MINNESOTA RIVER, MN................... 200 200 MISS RIVER BTWN MO RIVER AND 44,904 44,904 MINNEAPOLIS (MVP PORTION)............ ORWELL LAKE, MN....................... 256 256 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MN......... 95 95 RED LAKE RESERVOIR, MN................ 84 84 RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF 3,170 3,170 MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN................ SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 323 323 WATERS, MN........................... TWO HARBORS, MN....................... 300 300 MISSISSIPPI CLAIRBORNE COUNTY PORT, MS............ 1 60 EAST FORK, TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MS........ 135 135 GULFPORT HARBOR, MS................... 3,715 10,000 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS..... 223 223 MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, MS.............. 30 160 OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS.................... 1,517 1,900 PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS................. 4,130 8,000 PEARL RIVER, MS & LA.................. 193 193 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MS......... 82 82 ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS................... 11 11 WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, MS. 30 30 YAZOO RIVER, MS....................... 26 26 MISSOURI CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO............. 10 500 CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN 6,449 6,449 LAKE, MO............................. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO................... 2,825 2,825 HARRY S TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, MO.. 8,528 8,863 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO..... 1,688 1,688 LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO........... 885 935 LONG BRANCH LAKE, MO.................. 1,057 1,100 MISS RIVER BTWN THE OHIO AND MO RIVERS 25,359 25,359 (REG WORKS), MO...................... NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO................. 152 400 NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO (MILE 889)...... ............... 300 POMME DE TERRE LAKE, MO............... 2,056 2,108 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MO......... 14 14 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MO... 327 327 SMITHVILLE LAKE, MO................... 1,162 1,203 SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MISSISSIPPI 8 8 RIVER, MO............................ STOCKTON LAKE, MO..................... 3,320 3,828 TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO & AR.............. 6,667 6,667 UNION LAKE, MO........................ 10 10 MONTANA FT. PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT............. 4,170 4,444 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MT..... 54 54 LIBBY DAM, MT......................... 1,712 1,712 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MT... 88 88 NEBRASKA GAVINS POINT DAM, LEWIS AND CLARK 5,935 6,518 LAKE, NE & SD........................ HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, NE................ 1,721 1,786 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NE..... 508 508 PAPILLION CREEK, NE................... 531 531 SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE........ 702 702 NEVADA INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NV..... 127 127 PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS LAKES, NV.... 204 204 NEW HAMPSHIRE BLACKWATER DAM, NH.................... 567 567 EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH............. 514 514 FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH................ 619 619 HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH........... 1,081 1,081 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NH..... 37 37 OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH.................. 598 598 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NH......... 300 300 SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH............... 596 596 NEW JERSEY ABSECON INLET, NJ..................... ............... 265 BARNEGAT INLET, NJ.................... 225 225 CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, 2,500 ............... NJ\1\................................ COLD SPRING INLET, NJ................. 243 243 DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, NJ.......... 15 15 DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA TO THE 18,778 18,778 SEA, NJ, PA & DE..................... DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA, PA TO 750 750 TRENTON, NJ.......................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NJ..... 253 253 LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY 150 ............... POINT, NJ\1\......................... MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ................... 160 160 NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NJ.. 250 250 NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC 300 300 RIVERS, NJ........................... PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM, NJ 254 254 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NJ......... 1,363 1,363 RARITAN AND SANDY HOOKS BAYS, 40 40 LEONARDO, NJ......................... RARITAN RIVER TO ARTHUR KILL CUT-OFF, 200 200 NJ................................... RARITAN RIVER, NJ..................... 220 220 SALEM RIVER, NJ....................... 70 70 SHARK RIVER, NJ....................... 775 775 SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ.... 300 300 SHREWSBURY RIVER, MAIN CHANNEL, NJ.... 120 120 NEW MEXICO ABIQUIU DAM, NM....................... 2,220 2,220 COCHITI LAKE, NM...................... 2,392 2,392 CONCHAS LAKE, NM...................... 1,121 1,121 GALISTEO DAM, NM...................... 423 423 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NM..... 811 811 JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM.................. 684 684 MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ENDANGERED SPECIES ............... 200 COLLABORATIVE PRO.................... RIO GRANDE BOSQUE REHABILITATION, NM.. ............... 4,000 SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM........... 940 940 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, NM... 502 502 TWO RIVERS DAM, NM.................... 452 452 UPPER RIO GRANDE WATER OPERATIONS 1,201 1,201 MODEL STUDY, NM...................... NEW YORK ALMOND LAKE, NY....................... 424 424 ARKPORT DAM, NY....................... 225 225 BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA 1,235 1,235 HARBOR, NY........................... BRONX RIVER, NY....................... 250 250 BUFFALO HARBOR, NY.................... 50 50 BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, NY................ 220 220 EAST RIVER, NY........................ 500 500 EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY............... 4,220 4,220 EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY.................. 473 473 EASTCHESTER CREEK, NY................. 180 180 FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, 500 ............... NY\1\................................ FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NY............ 380 380 GREAT SOUTH BAY, NY................... 80 80 HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, NY.............. 500 500 HUDSON RIVER, NY (MAINT).............. 1,125 1,125 HUDSON RIVER, NY (O&C)................ 1,525 1,525 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NY..... 1,031 1,031 JAMAICA BAY, NY....................... 250 250 JONES INLET, NY....................... 350 350 LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY............... 700 700 LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY........... 10 10 LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NY. 200 200 MATTITUCK HARBOR, NY.................. 20 20 MORICHES INLET, NY.................... 2,050 2,050 MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NY.................. 4,839 4,839 NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS, NY.. 6,750 6,750 NEW YORK HARBOR, NY................... 4,000 4,000 NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (DRIFT 6,300 6,300 REMOVAL)............................. NEW YORK HARBOR, NY (PREVENTION OF 950 950 OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSIT.................. NEWTOWN CREEK, NY..................... 220 220 PORTCHESTER HARBOR, NY................ 150 150 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NY......... 1,830 1,830 ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY.................. 1,605 1,605 SHINNECOCK INLET, NY.................. 200 200 SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL 839 839 PROJECTS, NY......................... SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 551 551 WATERS, NY........................... WESTCHESTER CREEK, NY................. 250 250 WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY................ 553 553 NORTH CAROLINA ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NC.... 900 2,000 B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, NC.... 1,633 1,633 BOGUE INLET, NC....................... ............... 400 CAPE FEAR RIVER ABOVE WILMINGTON, NC.. 718 718 CAROLINA BEACH INLET, NC.............. ............... 600 FALLS LAKE, NC........................ 1,683 1,683 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NC..... 250 250 LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, NC............. ............... 200 MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC........... 4,100 4,100 MASONBORO INLET AND CONNECTING 365 365 CHANNELS, NC......................... MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC.............. 5,000 5,000 NEW RIVER INLET, NC................... 800 800 NEW TOPSAIL INLET, NC................. ............... 400 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NC......... 675 675 ROLLINSON CHANNEL, NC................. 150 300 SILVER LAKE HARBOR, NC................ 400 400 W KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, NC.... 2,977 2,977 WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC................. 13,000 13,000 NORTH DAKOTA BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND................. 153 153 GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND...... 9,435 11,789 HOMME LAKE, ND........................ 151 293 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ND..... 360 360 LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND... 1,017 1,742 PIPESTEM LAKE, ND..................... 572 572 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ND... 119 119 SOURIS RIVER, ND...................... 280 280 SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 24 24 WATER, ND............................ OHIO ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH................... 1,439 1,439 ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH.................. 1,850 1,850 BERLIN LAKE, OH....................... 4,867 4,867 CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH................. 2,149 2,149 CLARENCE J BROWN DAM, OH.............. 2,520 2,520 CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH.................. 6,710 6,710 CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH................... 350 350 DEER CREEK LAKE, OH................... 1,359 1,359 DELAWARE LAKE, OH..................... 1,445 1,445 DILLON LAKE, OH....................... 1,454 1,454 FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH................... 2,026 2,026 HURON HARBOR, OH...................... 1,530 1,530 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OH..... 452 452 LORAIN HARBOR, OH..................... 2,423 2,423 MASSILLON LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH 24 24 MICHAEL J KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH 2,023 2,023 MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH............... 1,383 1,383 MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH............. 8,275 8,275 NORTH BRANCH KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH.. 593 593 OHIO--MISSISSIPPI FLOOD CONTROL, OH... 1,089 1,089 PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH.................. 1,307 1,307 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OH......... 295 295 ROSEVILLE LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH 35 35 SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 223 223 WATERS, OH........................... TOLEDO HARBOR, OH..................... 4,701 4,701 TOM JENKINS DAM, OH................... 791 791 WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH...... 865 865 WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH............ 1,837 1,837 OKLAHOMA ARCADIA LAKE, OK...................... 472 472 BIRCH LAKE, OK........................ 648 648 BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK................... 1,903 1,903 CANTON LAKE, OK....................... 1,707 1,707 COPAN LAKE, OK........................ 937 937 EUFAULA LAKE, OK...................... 5,348 5,348 FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK.................. 10,218 10,218 FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK.................. 742 742 GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK............ 256 256 HEYBURN LAKE, OK...................... 555 555 HUGO LAKE, OK......................... 1,493 1,493 HULAH LAKE, OK........................ 476 476 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OK..... 177 177 KAW LAKE, OK.......................... 2,574 2,574 KEYSTONE LAKE, OK..................... 6,073 6,073 MCCLELLAN--KERR ARKANSAS RIVER 5,819 5,819 NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK................ OOLOGAH LAKE, OK...................... 1,923 1,923 OPTIMA LAKE, OK....................... 164 164 PENSACOLA RESERVOIR, LAKE OF THE 119 119 CHEROKEES, OK........................ PINE CREEK LAKE, OK................... 1,099 1,099 ROBERT S KERR LOCK AND DAM AND 6,599 6,599 RESERVOIR, OK........................ SARDIS LAKE, OK....................... 912 912 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OK... 520 520 SKIATOOK LAKE, OK..................... 1,318 1,318 TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK.............. 3,794 3,794 WAURIKA LAKE, OK...................... 1,093 1,093 WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, OK........ 4,695 4,695 WISTER LAKE, OK....................... 678 678 OREGON APPLEGATE LAKE, OR.................... 904 904 BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR................... 427 427 BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA...... 11,701 9,691 CHETCO RIVER, OR...................... 574 574 COLUMBIA & LWR WILLAMETTE R BLW 24,973 18,052 VANCOUVER, WA & PORTLA............... COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & WA.. 15,125 15,125 COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA 640 640 AND THE DALLES, OR................... COOS BAY, OR.......................... 4,769 4,769 COQUILLE RIVER, OR.................... 307 307 COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR................ 991 991 COUGAR LAKE, OR....................... 1,549 5,380 DEPOE BAY, OR......................... 3 124 DETROIT LAKE, OR...................... 2,064 2,564 DORENA LAKE, OR....................... 831 831 FALL CREEK LAKE, OR................... 918 1,418 FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR................... 1,433 1,433 GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR.......... 1,823 2,323 HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR.................. 792 1,292 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 33 33 PROJECTS, OR......................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OR..... 413 413 JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA........ 7,049 7,049 LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR................ 2,261 2,761 LOST CREEK LAKE, OR................... 3,560 3,560 MCNARY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA.......... 5,183 5,183 PORT ORFORD, OR....................... 7 7 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OR......... 220 220 ROGUE RIVER AT GOLD BEACH, OR......... 587 587 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OR... 82 82 SIUSLAW RIVER, OR..................... 583 583 SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR.................. 5 5 SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 10,400 10,400 WATERS, WA........................... TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR............. 35 2,200 UMPQUA RIVER, OR...................... 635 635 WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, 210 210 OR................................... WILLAMETTE RIVER BANK PROTECTION, OR.. 62 62 WILLAMETTE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, 3,331 ............... OR\1\................................ WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR................. 610 610 YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR............ 1,482 1,482 YAQUINA RIVER, OR..................... ............... 300 PENNSYLVANIA ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA................... 6,578 6,578 ALVIN R BUSH DAM, PA.................. 591 591 AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA............. 215 215 BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA................... 1,311 1,311 BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA................... 2,736 2,736 CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA.............. 1,734 1,734 COWANESQUE LAKE, PA................... 1,847 1,847 CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA................ 2,530 2,530 CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA................. 625 625 EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA.... 2,179 2,179 FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA.......... 633 633 FRANCIS E WALTER DAM, PA.............. 774 774 GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND 228 228 RESERVOIR, PA........................ INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PA..... 592 592 JOHNSTOWN, PA......................... 2,255 2,255 KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PA 2,493 2,493 LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA................... 2,880 2,880 MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA............... 1,823 1,823 MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA................. 12,392 12,392 OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, PA, OH & WV 24,796 24,796 OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, PA, OH & 509 509 WV................................... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PA......... 70 70 PROMPTON LAKE, PA..................... 505 505 PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA...................... 20 20 RAYSTOWN LAKE, PA..................... 3,312 3,312 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, PA... 46 46 SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA.................. 2,000 3,000 SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA............... 2,366 2,366 STILLWATER LAKE, PA................... 331 331 SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 93 93 WATERS, PA........................... TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA............... 2,213 2,213 TIONESTA LAKE, PA..................... 3,115 3,115 UNION CITY LAKE, PA................... 1,017 1,017 WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA............... 1,033 1,033 YORK INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA.............. 471 471 YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA & MD...... 2,908 2,908 PUERTO RICO ARECIBO HARBOR, PR.................... 100 100 RHODE ISLAND GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (new ............... 250 Harbor).............................. BLOCK ISLAND HARBOR, RI............... 360 500 FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER, RI....... ............... 500 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, RI..... 43 43 POINT JUDITH HARBOR OF REUGE, RI...... 1,250 1,250 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, RI......... 400 400 PROVIDENCE HARBOR SHIPPING CHANNEL, RI ............... 300 WOONSOCKET, RI........................ ............... 300 SOUTH CAROLINA ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC.... 724 1,500 CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC\1\.............. 12,527 9,947 COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC... 4,685 4,685 FOLLY RIVER, SC\1\.................... 35 ............... GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC................. 690 690 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SC..... 65 65 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, SC......... 624 624 SOUTH DAKOTA BIG BEND DAM, LAKE SHARPE, SD......... 6,799 6,799 CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER ............... 3,000 BRULE SIOUX, SD...................... COLD BROOK LAKE, SD................... 303 303 COTTONWOOD SPRINGS LAKE, SD........... 223 223 FORT RANDALL DAM, LAKE FRANCIS CASE, 7,328 7,328 SD................................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SD..... 49 49 LAKE TRAVERSE, SD & MN................ 403 403 OAHE DAM, LAKE OAHE, SD & ND.......... 8,977 9,277 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, SD... 52 52 TENNESSEE CENTER HILL LAKE, TN.................. 7,021 7,021 CHEATHAM LOCK AND DAM, TN............. 6,829 6,829 CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN. 1,200 1,200 CORDELL HULL DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN.... 6,386 6,386 DALE HOLLOW LAKE, TN.................. 6,262 6,262 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN..... 85 85 J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN. 4,602 4,602 OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, TN.......... 9,845 9,845 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TN......... 9 9 TENNESSEE RIVER, TN................... 20,219 20,219 WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TN................. 107 107 TEXAS AQUILLA LAKE, TX...................... 1,354 1,354 ARKANSAS--RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE 1,415 1,415 CONTROL--AREA VI..................... BARBOUR TERMINAL CHANNEL, TX.......... 1,417 1,417 BARDWELL LAKE, TX..................... 2,162 2,162 BAYPORT SHIP CHANNEL, TX.............. 3,122 3,122 BELTON LAKE, TX....................... 3,567 3,567 BENBROOK LAKE, TX..................... 2,302 2,302 BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX.............. 3,259 3,259 BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX..... 1,723 1,723 CANYON LAKE, TX....................... 3,686 3,686 CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX........... 348 348 CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX....... 3,398 3,398 DENISON DAM, LAKE TEXOMA, TX.......... 6,393 6,393 ESTELLINE SPRINGS EXPERIMENTAL 38 38 PROJECT, TX.......................... FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM, LAKE O' THE 4,179 4,179 PINES, TX............................ FREEPORT HARBOR, TX................... 7,020 7,020 GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX...... 6,022 6,022 GIWW, CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TX......... 2,706 2,706 GIWW, CHOCOLATE BAYOU, TX............. 2,926 2,926 GRANGER DAM AND LAKE, TX.............. 2,225 2,225 GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX.................... 2,900 2,900 GREENS BAYOU, TX...................... 850 850 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TX........ 31,874 31,874 HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX.................. 1,479 1,479 HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX.............. 15,354 14,854 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TX..... 1,936 1,936 JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX.................. 2,001 2,001 JOE POOL LAKE, TX..................... 1,771 1,771 LAKE KEMP, TX......................... 214 214 LAVON LAKE, TX........................ 3,065 3,065 LEWISVILLE DAM, TX.................... 4,110 4,110 MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX............ 6,173 6,173 NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX................ 3,542 3,542 NORTH SAN GABRIEL DAM AND LAKE 2,066 2,066 GEORGETOWN, TX....................... O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX.......... 907 907 PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX.................... 1,005 1,005 PROCTOR LAKE, TX...................... 2,155 2,155 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TX......... 304 304 RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX.................. 1,456 1,456 SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX............ 8,822 8,822 SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX..... 5,820 5,820 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, TX... 101 101 SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX................... 3,157 3,157 STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX............. 2,210 2,210 TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX........... 1,482 1,482 TEXAS WATER ALLOCATION ASSESSMENT, TX. 100 1,000 TOWN BLUFF DAM, B A STEINHAGEN LAKE, 2,735 2,735 TX................................... WACO LAKE, TX......................... 3,090 3,090 WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX.................. 1,747 1,747 WHITNEY LAKE, TX...................... 8,559 8,559 WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX........ 4,532 4,532 UTAH INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, UT..... 75 75 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, UT... 598 598 VERMONT BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT................ 719 719 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VT..... 70 70 NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT & NY.... 80 80 NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT............... 635 635 NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT............ 747 747 TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT.................... 681 681 UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT................. 578 578 VIRGINIA APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA.................. ............... 500 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--ACC, 1,823 1,823 VA................................... ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--DSC, 967 967 VA................................... CHINCOTEAGUE HARBOR OF REFUGE, VA..... 266 266 CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA................ 207 207 GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA..... 2,022 2,022 HAMPTON RDS, NORFOLK & NEWPORT NEWS 1,108 1,108 HBR, VA (DRIFT REM................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VA..... 226 226 JAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA............... 3,667 3,667 JOHN H KERR LAKE, VA & NC............. 11,571 11,571 JOHN W FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA 1,938 1,938 LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA................... 1,058 1,058 NORFOLK HARBOR, VA.................... 10,072 10,072 NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA.... 656 656 PHILPOTT LAKE, VA..................... 6,961 6,961 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VA......... 870 870 RUDEE INLET, VA....................... 370 370 WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, VA. 54 54 WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA, VA. 260 260 YORK RIVER, VA........................ 250 250 WASHINGTON CHIEF JOSEPH DAM GAS ABATEMENT, WA\1\. 6,500 ............... CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, WA.................. 785 785 COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA & OR.. 3 500 COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK AND 6 500 SAND ISLAND, WA...................... COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, WA, OR 95,700 ............... & ID\1\.............................. EDIZ HOOK, WA......................... 63 63 EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA 1,293 1,293 GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA... 9,180 9,180 HOWARD HANSON DAM ECOSYSTEM 15,000 ............... RESTORATION, WA\1\................... HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA................. 2,627 2,627 ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM, WA........... 4,982 4,982 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 70 70 PROJECTS, WA......................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WA..... 623 623 LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA........ 7,554 7,554 LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM, WA......... 2,360 2,360 LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA........ 6,874 6,874 LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, WA..... 7,787 4,664 LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE 1,500 ............... COMPENSATION,\1\..................... MILL CREEK LAKE, WA................... 2,437 2,437 MOUNT ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA. 257 257 MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA.................. 3,271 3,271 NEAH BAY, WA.......................... 308 308 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WA......... 338 338 PUGET SOUND AND TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA.. 997 997 QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA.................. 1,572 1,572 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WA... 506 506 SEATTLE HARBOR, WA.................... 913 913 STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA............... 248 248 SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 53 53 WATERS, WA........................... SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA................. ............... 400 TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA............ 120 120 THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM, WA & OR...... 7,696 7,696 WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR, WA.......... 34 34 WEST VIRGINIA BEECH FORK LAKE, WV................... 1,473 2,500 BLUESTONE LAKE, WV.................... 1,508 1,508 BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV................... 1,973 1,973 EAST LYNN LAKE, WV.................... 2,044 2,044 ELKINS, WV............................ 14 14 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WV..... 255 255 KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV...... 9,380 9,380 OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV, KY & OH 30,292 30,292 OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, WV, KY & 2,700 2,700 OH................................... R D BAILEY LAKE, WV................... 2,836 2,836 STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV............ 1,039 1,039 SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV................. 2,044 2,044 SUTTON LAKE, WV....................... 2,210 2,210 TYGART LAKE, WV....................... 1,521 1,521 WISCONSIN EAU GALLE RIVER LAKE, WI.............. 611 611 FOX RIVER, WI......................... 1,775 3,775 GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI\1\............... 4,344 5,394 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WI..... 125 125 MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI.................. 650 650 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WI......... 160 160 STURGEON BAY HARBOR AND LAKE MICHIGAN 16 16 SHIP CANAL, WI....................... SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 498 498 WATERS, WI........................... TWO RIVER HARBOR, WI.................. ............... 400 WYOMING INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WY..... 34 34 JACKSON HOLE LEVEES, WY............... 326 326 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WY... 87 87 TOTALLING ADJUSTMENTS................. -20 ............... --------------------------------- SUBTOTAL, PROJECTS LISTED UNDER 2,348,593 2,161,160 STATES......................... REMAINING ITEMS AQUATIC NUISANCE CONTROL RESEARCH..... 690 690 ASSET MANAGEMENT/FACILITIES AND 4,750 4,750 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE................ BUDGET/MANAGEMENT SUPPORT FOR O&M 5,865 5,865 BUSINESS LINES....................... ACTIONS FOR CHANGE TO IMPROVE 7,737 4,000 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............ COASTAL INLET RESEARCH PROGRAM........ 2,475 2,475 CONTINUING AUTHORITY PROJECTS NOT 2,278 ............... REQUIRING SPECIFIC LEGISLATION BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL (SECTION 204/207/933)................ NATIONAL MITIGATION PROJECTS 5,325 ............... (SECTION 111).................... CULTURAL RESOURCES (NAGPRA/CURATION).. 1,500 1,500 DREDGE WHEELER READY RESERVE.......... 12,000 12,000 DREDGING DATA AND LOCK PERFORMANCE 1,062 1,062 MONITORING SYSTEM.................... DREDGING OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL 6,080 6,080 RESTORATION (DOE..................... DREDGING OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT 1,391 1,391 PROGRAM (DOTS)....................... EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM.. 270 270 FACILITY PROTECTION................... 12,000 12,000 GREAT LAKES SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODEL.. 900 900 INDEPENDENT (PART) ASSESSMENT OF 500 500 ENVIRONMENT--STEWARDSHIP............. INLAND WATERWAY NAVIGATION CHARTS..... 3,708 3,708 INLAND NAVIGATION SAFETY INITIATIVE... 3,000 3,000 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS......... 1,780 1,780 MONITORING OF COASTAL NAVIGATION 1,575 1,575 PROJECTS............................. NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM...... 7,000 13,900 NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM........... 15,000 15,000 NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (NEPP) 6,000 6,000 NATIONAL (LEVEE) FLOOD INVENTORY...... 10,000 10,000 NATIONAL NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 3,326 3,326 ACTIVITIES........................... NATIONAL PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT FOR 300 300 REALLOCATION......................... PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL SUPPORT 300 300 (ABS-P2, WINABS)..................... PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION: REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS......... 500 500 PROTECT, CLEAR AND STRAIGHTEN 50 50 CHANNELS (SEC 3)................. WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS.... 4,271 4,271 HARBOR MAINTENANCE FEE DATA 725 725 COLLECTION....................... RECREATION ONE STOP (R1S) NATIONAL 1,130 1,130 RECREATION RESERVAT.................. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT 1,391 4,500 DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM................ Southeast Oahu Regional Sediment ............... (500) Management, HI................... North Carolina RSM, NC............ ............... (600) Delaware Estuary RSM, NJ.......... ............... (300) South Jetty and Clatsop Spit, OR.. ............... (500) South Coastal Rhode Island ............... (750) Regional Sediment Management..... Long Island Coastal Planning, NY.. ............... (500) RELIABILITY MODELS PROGRAM FOR MAJOR 608 608 REHAB................................ WATER OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT 653 653 (WOTS)............................... --------------------------------- SUBTOTAL FOR ITEMS NOT LISTED 126,140 124,809 UNDER STATES................... TOTALLING ADJUSTMENTS................. 267 ............... ANTICIPATED SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE...... ............... -65,969 --------------------------------- TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 2,475,000 2,220,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ \1\ITEMS FUNDED IN CONSTRUCTION. Lowell Creek Tunnel, Alaska.--The Committee recommendation includes $500,000 for studies to divert tunnel flood flows away from the city of Seward. Petersberg Harbor, Alaska.--$500,000 is recommended to obtain environmental clearances in advance of a planned dredging of the harbor in 2010. Helena Harbor, Arkansas.--The Committee recommends $400,000 for maintenance dredging of this harbor. Osceola Harbor, Arkansas.--The Committee recommends $500,000 for maintenance dredging of this harbor. Dana Point Harbor, California.--The Committee has recommended $700,000 for surveys and dredging. Noyo Harbor, California.--$750,000 is recommended for dredging. Cherry Creek, Chatfield, and Trinidad Lakes, Colorado.--The Committee has recommended an additional $1,000,000 for continued repairs at these three lakes. This action in no way is intended to alter the Corps of Engineers' lease and property accountability policies. It is the Committee's understanding that the State of Colorado has agreed to cost share this project on a 50-50 basis. It is also the understanding of the Committee that the Secretary is not to assume, nor share in the future of the operation and maintenance of these recreation facilities. Harbor of Refuge, Lewes, Delaware.--The Committee recommends $500,000 to perform a stability analysis, as well as, surveys and design work on the historic breakwater in this harbor. Small Harbors, Delaware.--The Committee recommendation includes funds to dredge a number of small harbors in Delaware. With the limited funding available to the Committee, the Committee has attempted to provide for some of the dredging needs of the State. However, recognizing that conditions on these small harbors is constantly changing the Committee is directing the Corps to propose a dredging program for fiscal year 2009 that would most effectively utilize the scarce funds available for these harbor projects. Wilmington Harbor, Delaware.--The Committee recommendation includes $3,750,000 for this project. Additional funds recommended above the budget request are for maintenance of disposal areas and additional dredging. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee to Anclote, Florida.--The Committee recommends $1,000,000 for maintenance dredging. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Florida.--The Committee recommendation includes $2,500,000 for maintenance dredging. Miami River, Florida.--The Committee recommends $10,820,000 for completion of the dredging of the Miami River Channel. This project provides the first maintenance dredging of the Miami River since its original authorization in 1930. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Georgia.--$1,000,000 is recommended for dredging critical areas of this waterway as well as for work related to new upland disposal sites. Savannah Harbor, Georgia.--The Committee recommendation for Savannah Harbor includes the funds recommended for O&M in this account and $5,275,000 in the Dredged Material Disposal Facilities program in the Construction, General account. The administration proposed these two funding amounts as a single line item in O&M. Barbers Point, Hawaii.--The Committee recommends an additional $348,000 above the budget request for daily operation and maintenance and facility upgrades to public use facilities. Northwestern Division Projects, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, and Oregon.--Small changes were recommended to the budget request by the Corps. The Senate request shown for these projects represents the revised budget amount not an increase or decrease taken by the Committee. Chicago Harbor, Illinois.--The Committee is aware of the City of Chicago's interest in modifying the existing Chicago Lakefront Inner Breakwater consistent with the City of Chicago's 2016 Olympic Master Plan for Chicago Harbor. The Committee encourages the Chicago District of the Army Corps of Engineers to work with the City of Chicago on preliminary design concepts, cost estimates and other aspects of the project to determine what environmental, recreational and economic development benefits might be achieved by the City's proposal. Green and Barren Rivers, Kentucky.--The Committee recommends an additional $1,000,000 for the Green River Lock and Dam number 3 (Rochester Lock) detailed engineering analysis for stabilizing the existing lock structure and further the evaluation of the stability of the dam structure. Barren River Lake, Kentucky.--The Committee recommends an additional $2,000,000 for the Port Oliver Public Use Facility. Small Waterway Dredging on the Louisiana Coast, Louisiana.--The Committee has included additional funds for a number of the smaller waterways on the Louisiana gulf coast that were not funded in the administration's budget request. With the limited funding available to the Committee, the Committee has attempted to provide for some of the dredging needs of the State. However, recognizing that conditions on these small waterways is constantly changing the Committee is directing the Corps to propose a dredging program for fiscal year 2009 that would most effectively utilize the scarce funds available for these harbor projects. Small Harbors, Maryland.--The Committee recommendation includes funds to dredge a number of small harbors used by waterman on the Chesapeake Bay. With the limited funding available to the Committee, the Committee has attempted to provide for some of the dredging needs of the State. However, recognizing that conditions on these small waterways is constantly changing the Committee is directing the Corps to propose a dredging program for fiscal year 2009 that would most effectively utilize the scarce funds available for these harbor projects New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, Massachusetts.--The Committee has recommended an additional $100,000 to evaluate improvements to the barrier in cooperation with the city to improve pedestrian access to the waterfront. Michigan Harbor Dredging, Michigan.--The Committee notes that there are some 50 federally maintained harbors and waterways in Michigan. However, the Committee also notes that fewer than 20 are budgeted. With the limited funding available to the Committee, the Committee has recommended $5,000,000 under this line item to provide for some of the dredging needs of the State rather than trying to fund small amounts for each project. The Committee has listed all of the harbors and waterways in the table that are eligible for this funding. However, recognizing that conditions on these small waterways is constantly changing and the Great Lakes are suffering from near historic low water levels, the Committee is directing the Corps to propose a dredging program for fiscal year 2009 that would most effectively utilize the scarce funds available for these harbor and waterway projects. Rouge River, Michigan.--The Committee recommendation for Rouge River includes the funds recommended for O&M in this account and $160,000 in the Dredged Material Disposal Facilities program in the Construction, General account. The administration proposed these two funding amounts as a single line item in O&M. Mouth of the Yazoo River, Mississippi.---The Committee includes additional funds for the maintenance dredging of the entrance to the Vicksburg Harbor. Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi.--The Committee has recommended $7,500,000 for this project. Additional funds above the budget request are to perform maintenance dredging of the Bar Channel, the Pascagoula River, and Bayou Casotte channels. Rosedale Harbor, Mississippi.--The Committee recommendation includes $500,000 for maintenance dredging of the harbor. Absecon Inlet, New Jersey.--The Committee recommends $250,000 for dredging of the inlet. Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Collaborative Program, New Mexico.--The Committee has included $200,000 for the Corps to participate with the Bureau of Reclamation, the State and other agencies in the Rio Grande Collaborative Program. Rio Grande Bosque Rehabilitation, New Mexico.--The Committee includes $4,000,000 to continue fire reduction work and general Bosque rehabilitation in order to complete repairs and fire protection resulting from 2003 and 2004 fires in the urban interface. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, North Carolina.--The Committee recommends $2,000,000 for dredging of the project. Coastal Inlets, North Carolina.--The Committee has included additional funds for the coastal inlets on the North Carolina coast that were not funded in the administration's budget request. With the limited funding available to the Committee, the Committee has attempted to provide for some of the dredging needs of the State. However, recognizing that conditions on these inlets are constantly changing the Committee is directing the Corps to propose a dredging program for fiscal year 2009 that would most effectively utilize the scarce funds available for these inlets. Garrison Dam and Lake Sakakawea, North Dakota.--The Committee recommends $1,700,000 for the Williston Pumping Plant feature of the project; $100,000 for mosquito control; and $500,000 for the Corps to work in cooperation with the Friends of Lake Sakakawea to ensure the recreation sites around the lake can be utilized. Homme Lake, North Dakota.--Additional funds are recommended for dam safety activities and non-routine maintenance activities. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, North Dakota.--Additional funds are recommended to ensure basic levels of service, and for non-routine maintenance and dam safety activities. Oregon Coastal Ports, Oregon.--The Committee has included additional funds for a number of the coastal harbors on the Oregon coast that were either not funded or underfunded in the administration's budget request. With the limited funding available to the Committee, the Committee has attempted to provide for some of the dredging needs of the State. However, recognizing that conditions on these inlets are constantly changing the Committee is directing the Corps to propose a dredging program for fiscal year 2009 that would most effectively utilize the scarce funds available for these harbors. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux, South Dakota.--The Committee notes that title VI of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999, as amended, requires that funding to inventory and stabilize cultural and historic sites along the Missouri River in South Dakota, and to carry out the terrestrial wildlife habitat programs, shall be provided from the Operation and Maintenance account. The Committee provides $3,000,000 to protect cultural resource sites and provide funding to the State and tribes for approved restoration and stewardship plans and in compliance with the requirements of title VI, directs the Corps to contract with or reimburse the State of South Dakota and affected tribes to carry out these duties. Rhode Island Harbors, Rhode Island.--The Committee has included additional funds for a number of the harbors in Rhode Island that were either not funded or underfunded in the administration's budget request. With the limited funding available to the Committee, the Committee has attempted to provide for some of the dredging needs of the State. However, recognizing that conditions on these inlets are constantly changing the Committee is directing the Corps to propose a dredging program for fiscal year 2009 that would most effectively utilize the scarce funds available for these harbors. Fox Point Hurricane Barrier, Rhode Island.--$500,000 is recommended for the transfer of the project and routine O&M of the project. Woonsocket, Rhode Island.--$300,000 is recommended for the transfer of the project and routine O&M of the project. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, South Carolina.--The Committee recommendation for Charleston Harbor includes the funds recommended for O&M in this account and $2,580,000 in the Dredged Material Disposal Facilities program in the Construction, General account. The administration proposed these two funding amounts as a single line item in O&M. Oahe Dam, Lake Oahe, South Dakota, and North Dakota.--The Committee has recommended $300,000 to allow the Corps to modify public facilities so that they can be utilized with the extreme low water levels currently being experienced on the lake. Houston Ship Channel, Texas.--The Committee recommendation for the Houston Ship Channel includes the funds recommended for O&M in this account and $500,000 in the Construction, General account for beneficial use of dredged material. The administration proposed these two funding amounts as a single line item in O&M. Texas Water Allocation Study, Texas.--The Committee recommends $1,000,000 for this ongoing study. Chinook, Head of Sand Island, and Baker Bay, Washington.-- The Committee notes the proximity of Corps navigation facilities on the Columbia River between Chinook and the Head of Sand Island, Washington, and at Baker Bay, Washington, and encourage the Corps of Engineers to seek ways to achieve cost savings and efficiency, such as by utilizing appropriate contracting methods while having these two projects be considered together when seeking bids and awarding contracts. Mud Mountain Dam, Washington.--Within the funds recommended, the Corps is directed to continue to satisfy Federal fish passage obligations for the term of the cooperative agreement with Puget Sound Energy. Beech Fork Lake, West Virginia.--Additional funds recommended above the budget request are for repairs of public use facilities. Fox River, Wisconsin.--Additional funds recommended above the budget request are to reimburse Wisconsin, in accordance with the agreement, for the costs of repairs and rehabilitation of the transferred locks and for the Corps of Engineers to undertake major repairs for the dams and associated infrastructure. Green Bay Harbor, Wisconsin.--The Committee recommendation for Green Bay Harbor includes the funds recommended for O&M in this account and $950,000 in the Dredged Material Disposal Facilities program in the Construction, General account. The administration proposed these two funding amounts as a single line item in O&M. The Committee has also recommended an additional $1,050,000 for backlog maintenance dredging. Actions for Change to Improve Operation and Maintenance.-- The Committee has recommended $4,000,000 for this item. The Committee believes that these funds can serve to make significant improvements to the way the Corps administers completed projects to account for changed conditions since construction. National Coastal Mapping.--$13,900,000 is recommended for this program. Additional funds recommended above the budget request are for LIDAR bathymetry for use in regional sediment management and for Coastal Zone Mapping and Imaging LIDAR/LASER to be conducted with the University of Southern Mississippi. Regional Sediment Management Demonstration Program.--The Committee has recommended $4,500,000 for this program, $3,000,000 above the budget request. Within the funds recommended, the Corps is directed to undertake studies for the Southeast Coast of Oahu, Hawaii; the State of North Carolina; South Coastal Rhode Island; Delaware Estuary, New Jersey; and for Long Island, New York coastal planning. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES Appropriations, 2008.................................................... Budget estimate, 2009................................... $40,000,000 Committee recommendation................................ 40,000,000 The Committee has recommended $40,000,000 for the FCCE account. This account provides funds for preparedness activities for natural and other disasters, response, and emergency flood fighting and rescue operations, hurricane response, and emergency shore protection work. It also provides for emergency supplies of clean water where the source has been contaminated or where adequate supplies of water are needed for consumption. REGULATORY PROGRAM Appropriations, 2008.................................... $180,000,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 180,000,000 Committee recommendation................................ 183,000,000 An appropriation of $183,000,000 is recommended for the regulatory program of the Corps of Engineers. This appropriation provides for salaries and costs incurred administering regulation of activities affecting U.S. waters, including wetlands, in accordance with the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 33 U.S.C. section 401, the Clean Water Act of 1977 Public Law 95-217, and the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 Public Law 92-532. The appropriation helps maintain program performance, protects important aquatic resources, and supports partnerships with States and local communities through watershed planning efforts. The Committee is aware that the Corps of Engineers has begun a pilot program aimed at streamlining decisions for certain complex, high impact permit applications which have national or large regional implications. Specifically, we understand this program is focusing on projects related to rail capacity expansion, highway construction and pipelines where knowledge and experience gained in one district can be shared with other districts facing similar challenges, thus promoting efficiencies, the development and sharing of ``best practices,'' and use of virtual or dedicated teams to expedite broad-impact permit applications. Since the Committee continues to be concerned about the permit application backlog and delays in making permit decisions, it fully supports this effort and encourages the Corps to dedicate even more attention and expand its efforts to an even greater extent in developing and using this pilot program to minimize negative impacts of the backlog and resulting delays, especially where there are significant impacts to the nation's economy and environmental health. The Committee further supports the three emphasis areas selected for the pilot program as it believes them to be critical elements of a healthy, expanding economy which must be vigorously developed, but in an environmentally sound manner. The Committee is keenly aware that U.S. economic health and national security depends on the continued availability of reliable and affordable energy. The Committee is also aware that the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Regulatory Branch plays a key role by authorizing much of the 1.13 billion tons of coal production expected this year through its regulatory program. Therefore, the Committee directs the Corps to work with the Office of Surface Mining [OSM] to develop a more efficient process for issuing permits associated with surface coal mining operations. To avoid unnecessary time delays and duplication of agency resources, the Corps shall maintain the availability of a meaningful general permit for surface coal mining that may be issued in coordination with and for the term of the permit already required pursuant to the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act [SMCRA]. The Corps should also dedicate sufficient personnel and financial resources to support a consistent program for permit review and issuance. The Committee has included legislative text directing the Corps to reimburse the Port of Arlington, Oregon, up to $3,200,000 of the funds recommended for direct construction costs determined by the secretary to have been incurred by the port as a result of the issuance of a permit to construct a commercial dock and offload facility. Due to not scrupulously following established permit procedures the Corps was forced to withdraw the permit after the port had invested some $2,500,000. The port is now required to deconstruct these facilities. Reimbursement for the costs for removal of these facilities shall also be provided within this amount. FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM Appropriations, 2008.................................... $140,000,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 130,000,000 Committee recommendation................................ 140,000,000 The Committee recommends an appropriation of $140,000,000 to continue activities related to the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program [FUSRAP] in fiscal year 2005. The responsibility for the cleanup of contaminated sites under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program was transferred to the Army Corps of Engineers in the fiscal year 1998 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, Public Law 105-62. FUSRAP is not specifically defined by statute. The program was established in 1974 under the broad authority of the Atomic Energy Act and, until fiscal year 1998, funds for the cleanup of contaminated defense sites had been appropriated to the Department of Energy through existing appropriation accounts. In appropriating FUSRAP funds to the Corps of Engineers, the Committee intended to transfer only the responsibility for administration and execution of cleanup activities at eligible sites where remediation had not been completed. It did not intend to transfer ownership of and accountability for real property interests that remain with the Department of Energy. The Corps of Engineers has extensive experience in the cleanup of hazardous, toxic, and radioactive wastes through its work for the Department of Defense and other Federal agencies. The Committee always intended for the Corps' expertise be used in the same manner for the cleanup of contaminated sites under FUSRAP. The Committee expects the Corps to continue programming and budgeting for FUSRAP as part of the Corps of Engineers-- Civil program. The Committee directs the Corps to prioritize sites that are nearing completion during fiscal year 2008. The Corps is directed to prioritize sites that are nearing completion and initiate cleanup expeditiously for the former Sylvania nuclear fuel site in Hicksville, New York. GENERAL EXPENSES Appropriations, 2008.................................... $175,046,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 177,000,000 Committee recommendation................................ 177,000,000 This appropriation finances the expenses of the Office, Chief of Engineers, the Division Offices, and certain research and statistical functions of the Corps of Engineers. The Committee recommendation is $177,000,000. Executive Direction and Management.--The Office of the Chief of Engineers and 8 division offices supervise work in 38 district offices. Humphreys Engineer Center Support Activity.--This support center provides administrative services (such as personnel, logistics, information management, and finance and accounting) for the Office of the Chief of Engineers and other separate field operating activities. Institute for Water Resources.--This institute performs studies, analyses, and develops planning techniques for the management and development of the Nation's water resources. United States Army Corps of Engineers Finance Center.--This center provides centralized support for all Corps finance and accounting. Office of Congressional Affairs.--The Committee has included statutory language for the past several years prohibiting any funds from being used to fund an Office of Congressional Affairs within the executive office of the Chief of Engineers. The Committee believes that an Office of Congressional Affairs for the Civil Works Program would hamper the efficient and effective coordination of issues with the Committee staff and Members of Congress. The Committee believes that the technical knowledge and managerial expertise needed for the Corps headquarters to effectively address Civil Works authorization, appropriation, and headquarters policy matters resides in the Civil Works organization. Therefore, the Committee strongly recommends that the Office of Congressional Affairs not be a part of the process by which information on Civil Works projects, programs, and activities is provided to Congress. The Committee reminds the Corps that the General Expenses account is to be used exclusively for executive oversight and management of the Civil Works Program. In 1998, The Chief of Engineers issued a Command Directive transferring the oversight and management of the General Expenses account, as well as the manpower associated with this function, from the Civil Works Directorate to the Resource Management Office. The Corps is reminded that General Expense funds are appropriated solely for the executive management and oversight of the Civil Works Program under the direction of the Director of Civil Works. The Committee is pleased with the efforts of the Corps to restructure the management of general expense funds. It continues to believe that the general expense dollars are ultimately at the discretion of the Chief of Engineers and are intended to be utilized in his effort to carry out the Corps' civil works mission. The new controls put in place to manage the general expense dollars and evaluate the needs of the Corps address the Committee's previous concerns. The Committee requests the Corps continue to provide biannual written notification of the dispersal of general expense funds. Millions of dollars have been spent over the last several years on an initiative to contract out Government jobs in order to make the Government more efficient. However, in more than 70 percent of the cases Government employees win the competition for their jobs. The Committee fails to see any evidence of cost savings or increased efficiency by undergoing these expensive competitions. Therefore, the Committee directs that no funds provided in this account or otherwise available for expenditure shall be used to comply with the competitive sourcing initiative. OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) Appropriations, 2008.................................... $4,500,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 6,000,000 Committee recommendation................................ 4,500,000 The Committee has recommended $4,500,000 for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) [OASA(CW)]. As has been previously stated, the Committee believes that this office should be funded through the Defense appropriations bill and directs the administration to budget for this office under the Department of Defense, Operation and Maintenance--Army account in future budget submissions. The Committee continues to believe that the ASA(CW) has neither the time nor should he be involved in the day-to-day operational matters of the civil works program. It is the Committee's opinion that the traditional role of the ASA(CW) is to provide the Chief of Engineers advice about policy matters and generally be the political spokesperson for the administration's policies; however, the Chief of Engineers is responsible for carrying out the program. This is underscored by the administration's budget documents that state that the OASA(CW) provides policy direction and oversight for the civil works program and the Headquarters of the Corps provides executive direction and management of the civil works program. The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works advises the Secretary of the Army on a variety of matters, including the Civil Works program of the Corps of Engineers. The Assistant Secretary is a member of the Army Secretariat with responsibilities, such as participating in Continuity of Government exercises that extend well beyond Civil Works. The Assistant Secretary also oversees the administration, operation and maintenance, and capital development of Arlington National Cemetery and the Soldiers' and Airmen's Home National Cemetery. Congressional oversight of the Army Cemetery program lies not with the Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee, but rather with the Appropriations Subcommittee on Military Construction and Veterans Affairs and with the Committee on Veterans Affairs. The Army's accounting system does not track OMA funding of overhead or Army-wide support offices on the basis of which office receives support, nor would it be efficient or effective to do so for a 20-person office. Instead, expenses such as legal support, personnel services, finance and accounting services, the executive motor pool, travel on military aircraft, and other support services are centrally funded and managed on a department-wide basis. Transferring the funding for the expenses of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Works to a separate account has greatly complicated the Army's accounting for such indirect and overhead expenses with no commensurate benefit to justify the change. The Committee does not agree that these costs should be funded in this bill and therefore has only provided funding for salaries and expenses as in previous years. GENERAL PROVISIONS--CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL Section 101. The bill includes language concerning reprogramming guidelines. Section 102. The bill includes language prohibiting implementation of competitive sourcing or HPO. Section 103. The bill includes language prohibiting the divesting or transferring Civil Works functions. Section 104. The bill includes language concerning report notifications. Section 105. The bill includes language concerning reallocations in Lake Cumberland, Kentucky. Section 106. The bill includes language regarding the Middle Rio Grande Collaborative Program, New Mexico. Section 107. The bill includes language regarding congressional budget justifications. Section 108. The bill includes language authorizing a study of the Missouri River. Section 109. The bill includes language increasing the cost ceiling for the Folsom, California, Bridge. Section 110. The bill includes language regarding crediting of non-Federal expenditures on the San Lorenzo River, California project. Section 111. The bill includes language concerning the Missouri River Levee System. Section 112. The bill includes language concerning Corps of Engineers Senior Executive Service positions. Section 113. The bill includes language regarding a replacement health care facility at Lake Sakakawea, North Dakota. Section 114. The bill includes language concerning continuing contracts and the Inland Waterway Trust Fund. Section 115. The bill includes language increasing the cost ceiling on the LMRMRIS. Section 116. The bill includes language modifying the Middle Rio Grande Bosque project. Section 117. The bill includes language modifying the San Antonio, Texas, project. Section 118. The bill includes language concerning the Morganza to the Gulf, Louisiana project. Section 119. The bill includes language concerning Chatfield Lake, Colorado. Section 120. The bill includes language increasing the cost ceiling for the Big Sioux River, South Dakota project. TITLE II DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Central Utah Project Completion Account Appropriations, 2008.................................... $43,000,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 42,000,000 Committee recommendation................................ 42,000,000 The Committee recommendation for fiscal year 2009 to carry out the provisions of the Central Utah Project Completion Act totals $42,000,000. An appropriation of $39,373,000 has been provided for Central Utah project construction; $987,000 for fish, wildlife, and recreation, mitigation and conservation. The Committee recommendation provides $1,640,000 for program administration and oversight. Legislative language is included which allows up to $1,500,000 of the funds provided to be used for administrative costs. The Central Utah Project Completion Act (titles II-VI of Public Law 102-575) provides for the completion of the central Utah project by the Central Utah Water Conservancy District. The Act also authorizes the appropriation of funds for fish, wildlife, recreation, mitigation, and conservation; establishes an account in the Treasury for the deposit of these funds and of other contributions for mitigation and conservation activities; and establishes a Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission to administer funds in that account. The act further assigns responsibilities for carrying out the act to the Secretary of the Interior and prohibits delegation of those responsibilities to the Bureau of Reclamation. Bureau of Reclamation WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES Appropriations, 2008.................................... $949,882,000 Budget estimate, 2009\1\................................ 779,320,000 Committee recommendation................................ 927,320,000 \1\Includes rescission of $175,000,000. An appropriation of $927,320,000 is recommended by the Committee for general investigations of the Bureau of Reclamation. The water and related resources account supports the development, management, and restoration of water and related natural resources in the 17 Western States. The account includes funds for operating and maintaining existing facilities to obtain the greatest overall level of benefits, to protect public safety, and to conduct studies on ways to improve the use of water and related natural resources. Work will be done in partnership and cooperation with non-Federal entities and other Federal agencies. The Committee has divided underfinancing between the Resources Management Subaccount and the Facilities Operation and Maintenance subaccount. The Committee directs that the underfinancing amount in each subaccount initially be applied uniformly across all projects within the subaccounts. Upon applying the underfinanced amounts, normal reprogramming procedures should be undertaken to account for schedule slippages, accelerations or other unforeseen conditions. DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS The Committee received more than 130 requests for projects, programs, studies or activities for the Bureau of Reclamation for fiscal year 2009. These were items that were additions to the budget request as well as those included in the budget request. The Committee obviously was unable to accommodate all of these requests. In the interest of providing full disclosure of funding provided in the Energy and Water bill, all disclosures are made in this report accompanying the bill. All of the projects funded in this report have gone through the same rigorous public review and approval process as those proposed for funding by the President. The difference in these projects, of course, is that the congressionally directed projects are not subject to the artificial budgetary prioritization criteria that the administration utilizes to decide what not to fund. A new table has been added to the end of this report to show the requestors of the various projects. For those programs, projects, or studies that were included in the budgetary documents provided in the budget request, the words ``the President'' has been added to denote this administration request. The level of funding provided for each of these programs projects or studies should not be construed as what was requested. Rather, the only intent is to disclose the requestor. It should be noted that many line items only have the President listed as the requestor. It should not be inferred that the affected members are not interested in these projects studies or activities. Rather this is due to Committee direction that the President's budget requests are the basis for the Committee bill and a requests by the affected Members is unnecessary unless a Member wishes to request a different amount than the budget request. The purposes for the funding provided in the various accounts is described in the paragraphs associated with each account. The location of the programs, projects or studies are denoted in the account tables. The amounts recommended by the Committee are shown on the following table along with the budget request. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION--WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES [In thousands of dollars] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Budget estimate Committee ------------------------- recommendation Project title ----------------------- Resources Facilities Resources Facilities management OM&R management OM&R ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ARIZONA AK CHIN WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT PROJECT.................... ........... 9,900 .......... 9,900 ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT............................ ........... .......... 1,000 .......... COLORADO RIVER BASIN, CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT.................. 26,528 322 28,028 322 COLORADO RIVER FRONT WORK AND LEVEE SYSTEM..................... 2,350 .......... 2,350 .......... NORTHERN ARIZONA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM........................ 320 .......... 320 .......... PHOENIX METROPOLITAN WATER REUSE PROJECT....................... 200 .......... 200 .......... SALT RIVER PROJECT............................................. 469 131 469 131 SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE WATER SETTLEMENT ACT................... 325 .......... 325 .......... SOUTH/CENTRAL ARIZONA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................... 718 .......... 718 .......... SOUTHERN ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT PROJECT........... 2,969 .......... 2,969 .......... YUMA AREA PROJECTS............................................. 1,658 20,205 1,658 20,205 YUMA EAST WETLANDS............................................. ........... .......... 1,500 .......... CALIFORNIA CACHUMA PROJECT................................................ 1,016 702 1,016 1,102 CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.............................. 352 .......... 352 .......... CALLEGUAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RECYCLING PLANT............. 800 .......... 1,500 .......... CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECTS: AMERICAN RIVER DIVISION.................................... 1,708 7,772 1,708 7,772 AUBURN--FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT.................................. 2,088 .......... 2,088 .......... DELTA DIVISION............................................. 15,138 5,599 15,138 5,599 EAST SIDE DIVISION......................................... 1,591 2,943 1,591 2,943 FRIANT DIVISION............................................ 1,988 3,733 3,988 3,733 MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT PROGRAMS............................. 12,006 1,145 16,006 1,145 REPLACEMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND EXTRAORDINARY MAINTAINANCE.... ........... 24,091 .......... 24,091 SACRAMENTO RIVER DIVISION.................................. 931 1,497 7,931 1,497 SAN FELIPE DIVISION........................................ 675 100 675 100 SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION....................................... 391 .......... 391 .......... SHASTA DIVISION............................................ 150 7,764 150 7,764 TRINITY RIVER DIVISION..................................... 7,215 3,102 7,815 3,102 WATER AND POWER OPERATIONS................................. 1,117 8,334 1,117 8,334 WEST SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION, SAN LUIS UNIT................... 3,497 5,422 3,497 5,422 YIELD FEASIBILITY INVESTIGATION............................ 303 .......... 303 .......... INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL WATER RECYCLING PROJECT................. ........... .......... 1,000 .......... IRVINE BASIN GROUND AND SURFACE WATER.......................... ........... .......... 1,000 .......... LAKE TAHOE REGIONAL WETLANDS................................... 100 .......... 100 .......... LONG BEACH AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROJECT............ 692 .......... 692 .......... LONG BEACH DESALINATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROJ.......... ........... .......... 1,000 .......... MOKELUMNE RIVER REGIONAL WATER STORAGE & CONJUNCTIVE USE STUDY. ........... .......... .......... .......... ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL WATER RECLAMATION PROJECT............... 558 .......... 558 .......... ORLAND PROJECT................................................. ........... 703 .......... 703 SALTON SEA RESEARCH PROJECT.................................... 700 .......... 700 .......... SAN DIEGO AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM............. 3,000 .......... 3,000 .......... SAN GABRIEL BASIN PROJECT...................................... 700 .......... 700 .......... SAN JOSE AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM.............. 250 .......... 250 .......... SOLANO PROJECT................................................. 1,626 2,863 1,626 2,863 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM..................... 260 .......... 260 .......... VENTURA RIVER PROJECT.......................................... 389 31 389 31 COLORADO ANIMAS-LA PLATA PROJECT, CRSP.................................. 49,743 257 49,743 257 COLLBRAN PROJECT............................................... 166 1,390 166 1,390 COLORADO--BIG THOMPSON PROJECT................................. 450 12,842 450 12,842 COLORADO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................ 204 .......... 204 .......... FRUITGROWERS DAM PROJECT....................................... 75 154 75 154 FRYINGPAN--ARKANSAS PROJECT.................................... 172 8,123 172 8,123 GRAND VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II............................ 164 1,281 164 1,281 LEADVILLE/ARKANSAS RIVER RECOVERY.............................. 36 3,059 36 3,059 MANCOS PROJECT................................................. 42 104 42 104 PARADOX VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II.......................... 50 2,366 50 2,366 PINE RIVER PROJECT............................................. 184 151 184 151 SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT........................................ 292 4,345 292 4,345 UNCOMPAHGRE PROJECT............................................ 128 136 128 136 UPPER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS................................ 250 .......... 250 .......... IDAHO BOISE AREA PROJECTS............................................ 2,769 2,515 2,769 2,515 COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVER SALMON RECOVERY PROJECT............... 18,000 .......... 18,000 .......... IDAHO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................... 179 .......... 179 .......... LEWISTON ORCHARDS PROJECTS..................................... 548 30 548 30 MINIDOKA AREA PROJECTS......................................... 2,768 2,790 2,768 2,790 KANSAS KANSAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.................................. 73 .......... 73 .......... WICHITA-CHENEY PROJECT......................................... 10 375 10 375 WICHITA PROJECT--EQUUS BEDS DIVISION........................... 50 .......... 1,050 .......... MONTANA FORT PECK RESERVATION/DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER SYSTEM........... ........... .......... 15,000 .......... HUNGRY HORSE PROJECT........................................... ........... 653 .......... 653 HUNTLEY PROJECT................................................ 52 108 52 108 LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT...................................... 31 15 31 15 MILK RIVER PROJECT............................................. 308 1,340 308 1,340 MONTANA INVESTIGATIONS......................................... 134 .......... 134 .......... ROCKY BOYS/NORTH CENTRAL MONTANA REGIONAL WATER................ ........... .......... 10,000 .......... SUN RIVER PROJECT.............................................. 75 275 75 275 NEBRASKA MIRAGE FLATS PROJECT........................................... 12 158 12 158 NEBRASKA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................ 64 .......... 64 .......... NEVADA HALFWAY WASH PROJECT STUDY..................................... 200 .......... 200 .......... LAHONTAN BASIN PROJECT......................................... 5,021 2,684 7,521 2,684 LAKE MEAD/LAS VEGAS WASH PROGRAM............................... 900 .......... 2,725 .......... NORTH LAS VEGAS, WATER REUSE................................... ........... .......... 3,000 .......... NEW MEXICO ALBUQUERQUE METRO AREA WATER RECYCLING AND REUSE............... ........... .......... 1,000 .......... CARLSBAD PROJECT............................................... 2,657 1,127 2,657 1,127 EASTERN NEW MEXICO RURAL WATER SUPPLY.......................... ........... .......... 500 .......... JICARILLA APACHE RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM................ ........... .......... 1,000 .......... MIDDLE RIO GRANDE PROJECT...................................... 13,047 9,653 16,047 9,653 NAVAJO-GALLUP WATER SUPPLY, NM, UT, CO......................... ........... .......... 1,000 .......... NAVAJO NATION INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM........................... 77 .......... 77 .......... PECOS RIVER BASIN WATER SALVAGE PROJECT........................ ........... 203 .......... 203 RIO GRANDE PROJECT............................................. 590 3,752 590 3,752 SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.................... 59 .......... 59 .......... SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO/WEST TEXAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.......... 57 .......... 57 .......... TUCUMCARI PROJECT.............................................. 23 35 23 35 UPPER RIO GRANDE BASIN INVESTIGATIONS.......................... 29 .......... 29 .......... NORTH DAKOTA PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN--GARRISON DIVERSION UNIT............. 16,495 5,611 64,375 5,611 OKLAHOMA ARBUCKLE PROJECT............................................... 48 241 48 241 CENTRAL OKLAHOMA MASTER CONSERVATORY DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY ........... .......... 250 .......... MCGEE CREEK PROJECT............................................ 25 651 25 651 MOUNTAIN PARK PROJECT.......................................... ........... 523 .......... 523 NORMAN PROJECT................................................. 26 447 26 447 OKLAHOMA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................ 128 .......... 128 .......... WASHITA BASIN PROJECT.......................................... 30 1,396 30 1,396 W.C. AUSTIN PROJECT............................................ 65 416 65 416 OREGON BURNT, MALHEUR, OWYHEE, AND POWER RIVER BASIN WATER ........... .......... 300 .......... OPTIMIZATION FEASIBILITY STUDY................................ CROOKED RIVER PROJECT.......................................... 407 444 407 444 DESCHUTUS ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT........................ ........... .......... 300 .......... DESCHUTES PROJECT.............................................. 238 178 988 178 EASTERN OREGON PROJECTS........................................ 542 286 542 286 KLAMATH PROJECT................................................ 23,388 1,612 23,388 1,612 OREGON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.................................. 294 .......... 444 .......... ROGUE RIVER BASIN PROJECT, TALENT DIVISION..................... 577 325 577 325 SAVAGE RAPIDS DAM REMOVAL...................................... 3,000 .......... 3,000 .......... TUALATIN BASIN WATER SUPPLY PROJECT............................ ........... .......... 400 .......... TUALATIN PROJECT TITLE TRANSFER AND FACILITY ASSESSMENT STUDY.. ........... .......... 106 .......... TUALATIN PROJECT............................................... 111 270 111 270 UMATILLA PROJECT............................................... 954 2,978 954 2,978 SOUTH DAKOTA LEWIS AND CLARK RURAL WATER SYSTEM............................. ........... .......... 30,000 .......... MID-DAKOTA RURAL WATER PROJECT................................. ........... 15 .......... 15 MNI WICONI PROJECT............................................. 16,240 10,000 27,000 10,182 PERKINS COUNTY RURAL WATER SYSTEM.............................. ........... .......... 2,000 .......... RAPID VALLEY PROJECT, DEERFIELD DAM............................ ........... 86 .......... 86 TEXAS BALMORHEA PROJECT.............................................. 41 17 41 17 CANADIAN RIVER PROJECT......................................... 59 86 59 86 LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WATER RESOURCES........................ 50 .......... 4,050 .......... NUECES RIVER PROJECT........................................... 25 533 25 533 SAN ANGELO PROJECT............................................. 35 367 35 367 TEXAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................... 146 .......... 146 .......... UTAH HYRUM PROJECT.................................................. 146 32 146 32 MOON LAKE PROJECT.............................................. 3 73 3 73 NEWTON PROJECT................................................. 4 38 4 38 NORTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM........................... 156 .......... 456 .......... OGDEN RIVER PROJECT............................................ 196 172 196 172 PARK CITY FEASIBILLTY STUDY.................................... ........... .......... 500 .......... PROVO RIVER PROJECT............................................ 951 415 951 415 SCOFIELD PROJECT............................................... 55 78 55 78 STRAWBERRY VALLEY PROJECT...................................... 203 20 203 20 SOUTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM........................... 121 .......... 121 .......... WEBER BASIN PROJECT............................................ 1,028 720 1,028 720 WEBER RIVER PROJECT............................................ 30 107 30 107 WASHINGTON COLUMBIA BASIN PROJECT......................................... 3,737 6,811 6,737 6,811 ODESSA SUBAREA SPECIAL STUDY................................... 600 .......... 1,000 .......... WASHINGTON AREA PROJECTS....................................... 85 10 85 10 WASHINGTON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.............................. 57 .......... 145 .......... YAKIMA PROJECT................................................. 1,201 6,565 1,701 6,799 YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER ENHANCEMENT PROJECT................... 8,503 .......... 8,503 .......... YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER STORAGE............................... ........... .......... 500 .......... WYOMING KENDRICK PROJECT............................................... 91 3,242 91 3,242 NORTH PLATTE PROJECT........................................... 302 1,578 302 1,578 SHOSHONE PROJECT............................................... 84 665 84 665 WYOMING INVESTIGATIONS......................................... 26 .......... 26 .......... ------------------------------------------------ SUBTOTAL FOR PROJECTS.................................... 274,970 213,288 438,679 213,704 REGIONAL PROGRAMS COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL, TITLE I................. ........... 9,444 .......... 9,444 COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL, TITLE II................ 5,850 .......... 5,850 .......... COLORADO RIVER STORAGE, SECTION 5.............................. 1,918 3,995 1,918 3,995 COLORADO RIVER STORAGE, SECTION 8.............................. 710 .......... 710 .......... COLORADO RIVER WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM............... 265 .......... 265 .......... DAM SAFETY PROGRAM: DEPARTMENT DAM SAFETY PROGRAM.............................. ........... 1,250 .......... 1,250 INITIATE SOD CORRECTIVE ACTION............................. ........... 71,500 .......... 71,500 SAFETY OF EVALUATION OF EXISTING DAMS...................... ........... 18,500 .......... 18,500 DROUGHT EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM........................... 500 .......... 500 .......... EMERGENCY PLANNING & DISASTER RESPONSE PROGRAM................. ........... 1,422 .......... 1,422 ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION..................... 21,939 .......... 21,939 .......... ENVIRONMENTAL & INTERAGENCY COORDINATION ACTIVITIES............ 1,739 .......... 1,739 .......... ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION........................... 973 .......... 973 .......... EXAMINATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES............................. ........... 6,254 .......... 6,254 FEDERAL BUILDING SEISMIC SAFETY PROGRAM........................ ........... 1,384 .......... 1,384 GENERAL PLANNING STUDIES....................................... 2,163 .......... 2,163 .......... LAND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.............................. 7,481 .......... 7,481 .......... LOWER COLORADO RIVER INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAMS................... 243 .......... 243 .......... LOWER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM........................ 16,400 .......... 16,400 .......... MISCELLANEOUS FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS......................... ........... 714 .......... 714 NATIVE AMERICAN AFFAIRS PROGRAM................................ 7,020 .......... 7,020 .......... NEGOTIATION & ADMINISTRATION OF WATER MARKETING................ 1,658 .......... 1,658 .......... OPERATIONS AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.............................. 684 522 684 522 PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN--OTHER PICK-SLOAN.................... 3,687 37,053 3,687 37,053 POWER PROGRAM SERVICES......................................... 847 250 847 250 PUBLIC ACCESS AND SAFETY PROGRAM............................... 641 155 641 155 RECLAMATION LAW ADMINISTRATION................................. 2,132 .......... 2,132 .......... RECLAMATION RECREATION MANAGEMENT (TITLE XXVII)................ ........... .......... 1,000 .......... RECREATION & FISH & WILDLIFE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION............ 951 .......... 951 .......... RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: DESALINATION AND WATER PURIFICATION PROGRAM................ 375 1,600 2,375 1,600 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM............................. 9,000 .......... 9,000 .......... RURAL WATER LEGISLATION, TITLE I............................... 1,000 .......... 1,000 .......... SITE SECURITY.................................................. ........... 28,950 .......... 28,950 TITLE XVI WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM.................. 800 .......... 3,300 .......... UNITED STATES/MEXICO BORDER ISSUES--TECHNICAL SUPPORT.......... 93 .......... 93 .......... WATER FOR AMERICA INITIATIVE................................... 19,000 .......... 19,000 .......... ------------------------------------------------ SUBTOTAL, REGIONAL PROGRAMS.............................. 108,069 182,993 113,169 183,393 UNDER FINANCING................................................ ........... .......... -18,183 -3,442 ================================================ TOTAL WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES........................ 383,039 396,281 533,665 393,655 GRAND TOTAL.............................................. 779,320 779,320 927,320 927,320 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arizona Water Rights Settlement Act, Arizona.--Funds are recommended for advance planning and environmental compliance activities for rehabilitation of the San Carlos Irrigation Project in cooperation with the San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District. Central Arizona Project, Colorado River Basin.--The Committee recommendation includes additional funds for activities related to the Gila River Settlement in New Mexico and Arizona. Central Valley Project--Friant Division.--The Committee recommendation includes an additional $1,000,000 for the Friant-Kern and Madera canals capacity improvements and an additional $1,000,000 for the Semi Tropic Phase II groundwater banking. Miscellaneous Project Programs.--An additional $4,000,000 above the budget request is provided for anadromous fish screen projects. Central Valley Project-Sacramento River Division.--Within the funds recommended, $2,000,000 is recommended for the Sacramento Valley Integrated Plan and $5,000,000 is recommended for the Red Bluff Diversion Dam. Central Valley Project-Trinity River Division.--The Committee has recommended $600,000 above the budget request to accelerate implementation of the Trinity River Restoration Program. Mokelumne River Regional Water Storage, California.--The Committee directs the Secretary of the Department of the Interior to initiate a feasibility study authorized in title V of Public Law 109-338. In carrying out this study, the Secretary of the Interior shall include the entire Mokelumne River drainage as the study area and shall also consider regional projects that include recommendations for expansion of reservoir storage capacities. This study shall include in the feasibility study analysis the project currently under consideration by the Mokelumne River Forum and described in both the Northeastern San Joaquin County Groundwater Banking Authority and the Mokelumne-Amador-Calaveras Integrated Regional Water Management Plans. As authorized, this study is intended to be regional in scope and shall examine the feasibility of providing additional water supply and improved water management reliability to Mokelumne River Forum member agencies through the development of new storage and conjunctive use programs and projects, including, but not limited to, the Eastern San Joaquin Ground Water Basin, Pardee Reservoir, Lower Bear Reservoir, and Duck Creek. Fort Peck, Dry Prairie Rural Water System, Montana.--The Committee has recommended $15,000,000 for continued construction of this rural water project. Middle Rio Grande Project, New Mexico.--The Committee recommendation includes an additional $3,000,000 for additional needs in the Middle Rio Grande Collaborative Program. Truckee Canal Reconstruction, Nevada.--The canal breached in January 2008, flooding Fernley, Nevada. The Committee recommendation includes $2,500,000 under the Lahontan Basin project for Reclamation to perform an exploration/risk analysis of the canal to determine the full extent of rehabilitation needed for the canal to resume flows above 350 cubic feet per second. Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin, Garrison Diversion Unit, North Dakota.--Within the Committee recommendation, $52,000,000 is recommended for rural water projects. Of this amount, $26,000,000 shall be expended for the following projects: $8,000,000 for the Northwest Area Water Supply; $6,000,000 for the South Central Regional Water District; $4,000,000 for the North Central Rural Water System; $8,000,000 for the Southwest Pipeline. Additionally the Committee recommends $1,880,000 for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe Irrigation Project. Deschutes Project, Oregon.--Within the funds provided, $750,000 is recommended for water conservation measures. Oregon Investigations Program, Oregon.--$150,000 above the budget request is recommended for developing appraisal-level designs and cost estimates for on-reservation distribution systems. Northern Utah Investigations Program, Utah.--The Committee has recommended an additional $300,000 for the Rural Water Technology Alliance. Columbia Basin Project, Washington.--The Committee recommends an additional $3,000,000 above the budget request for the Potholes Reservoir Supplemental Feed Route Implementation. Odessa Subarea Special Study, Washington.--The Committee has provided $1,000,000 for this study. Yakima Project, Washington.--$500,000 of the funds recommended under this heading are for the Storage Dam Fish Passage Feasibility Study. Salt Cedar/Russian Olive Control.--The Committee has recommended no funding under the 2006 Salt Cedar/Russian Olive Control Act. Studies have shown that there is no water salvage gained by eradication of these invasive nuisance species. Without the water salvage component, there is no real nexus to Reclamation's mission of providing water and power to the West. The Committee agrees that these invasive species need to be controlled and eradicated, where possible, due to their ability to outcompete native vegetation. However, this mission is much more suited to other Federal agencies than the Bureau of Reclamation. Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project, Title I.--In fiscal years 2006 and 2008, the conferees expressed their concern that the Bureau of Reclamation was making excess releases of approximately 100,000 acre feet of water per year from storage in Colorado River reservoirs to help meet the United States' Colorado River water quality obligations to Mexico. The excess releases are being made because Wellton- Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District's agricultural return flows--that bypass the Colorado River and are discharged to the Cienega de Santa Clara in Mexico (bypass flows)--are not counted as part of the 1.5 million acre-feet of water that the United States is required to deliver annually to Mexico. Because the bypass flows are not counted, system storage from the Colorado River has been used to make up for the bypass flows. The Yuma Desalting Plant was originally constructed to treat the flows and return a portion of them to the river, thus reducing excess releases from Colorado River reservoirs. The current drought and projected long-term water demands have heightened concern about this demand on the river system. Consequently, in fiscal years 2006 and 2008, the conferees also directed the Bureau of Reclamation to dedicate sufficient resources to the Yuma Desalting Plant so that one-third operational capacity may be achieved by the end of calendar years 2006 and 2008, respectively. To date, the plant is not one-third operational, although Reclamation did conduct a demonstration run at one-tenth capacity for 90 days in 2007. The Committee, once again, directs the Bureau of Reclamation, within the funds provided for the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project, title I, to dedicate sufficient funds to the Yuma Desalting Plant so that one-third operational capacity may be achieved by the end of calendar year 2008. The Bureau of Reclamation is also directed to provide the Committee with a status report of the plant's operational status by no later than March 1, 2009. If the plant is not one-third operational by the end of calendar year 2008, the report shall include an explanation as to why the Bureau of Reclamation has failed to comply with the Committee's directive. Drought Emergency Assistance.--The Committee has provided the budget request for this program. Within the funds provided, the Committee urges the Bureau of Reclamation to provide full and fair consideration for drought assistance from the State of Hawaii. Research and Development, Desalination Research and Development Program.--The Committee recommends $2,000,000 above the budget request to be provided to New Mexico State University for research activities undertaken at or associated with the National Inland Desalination Research Facility. Title XVI, Water Reclamation, and Reuse.--The Committee has provided $3,300,000 for this program. Within the funds provided, the Committee has included $2,500,000 for the WateReuse Foundation. These funds are available to support the Foundation's research priorities. Water for America Initiative.--A critical component of reducing tension among multiple water users is collaborative planning and joint operations. Within the funds provided, funds are provided for the Desert Research Institute to address water quality and environmental issues in ways that will bring industry and regulators to mutually acceptable answers. Within the amounts provided, Reclamation is urged to continue urban water conservation projects identified through the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Innovative Conservation Program; industrial water efficiency surveys to assess opportunities to conserve water in industrial water use; and for weather based irrigation controller activities to pilot ways to speed distribution and acceptance of these landscape water efficiency devices. CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT RESTORATION FUND Appropriations, 2008.................................... $59,122,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... \1\56,079,000 Committee recommendation................................ 56,079,000 \1\Includes $7,500,000 legislative proposal on which Congress has not acted. The Committee recommends an appropriation of $56,079,000 for the Central Valley Project Restoration Fund. The Committee is aware that the legislation to effect a transfer of $7,500,000 in Friant surcharges to a new San Joaquin River Restoration Fund has not been enacted. However, the Committee has provided the administration's full request and included legislative text that would allow these funds to be utilized in the Central Valley Project Restoration Fund. It is the Committees' understanding that even if the legislation establishing the new fund is not established, inclusion of the Committee's legislative text would allow Reclamation to undertake San Joaquin River Settlement Act activities within existing authorities. The Central Valley Project Restoration Fund was authorized in the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, title 34 of Public Law 102-575. This fund was established to provide funding from project beneficiaries for habitat restoration, improvement and acquisition, and other fish and wildlife restoration activities in the Central Valley project area of California. Revenues are derived from payments by project beneficiaries and from donations. Payments from project beneficiaries include several required by the act (Friant Division surcharges, higher charges on water transferred to non-CVP users, and tiered water prices) and, to the extent required in appropriations acts, additional annual mitigation and restoration payments. CALIFORNIA BAY-DELTA RESTORATION (INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS) Appropriations, 2008.................................... $40,098,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 32,000,000 Committee recommendation................................ 42,000,000 This account funds activities that are consistent with the CALFED Bay-Delta Program, a collaborative effort involving 18 State and Federal agencies and representatives of California's urban, agricultural, and environmental communities. The goals of the program are to improve fish and wildlife habitat, water supply reliability, and water quality in the San Francisco Bay- San Joaquin River Delta, the principle hub of California's water distribution system. POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION Appropriations, 2008.................................... $58,811,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 59,400,000 Committee recommendation................................ 59,400,000 The Committee recommendation for general administrative expenses is $59,400,000. This is the same as the budget request. The policy and administrative expenses program provides for the executive direction and management of all reclamation activities, as performed by the Commissioner's offices in Washington, DC, Denver, Colorado, and five regional offices. The Denver office and regional offices charge individual projects or activities for direct beneficial services and related administrative and technical costs. These charges are covered under other appropriations. General Provisions--Department of the Interior Section 201. The bill includes language regarding the San Luis Unit and the Kesterson Reservoir in California. Section 202. The bill includes language that states requirements for purchase or lease of water from the Middle Rio Grande or Carlsbad Projects in New Mexico. Section 203. The bill includes language regarding Drought Emergency Assistance. Section 204. The bill includes language concerning the Water for America Initiative. Section 205. The bill includes language regarding the Rio Grande Collaborative water operations team. Section 206. The bill includes language concerning expending funds from the Desert Terminus Lakes program for the Truckee River Settlement Act. Section 207. The bill includes language concerning expending funds from the Desert Terminus Lakes program. TITLE III DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Laboratory Directed Research and Development [LDRD] The Committee recognizes the invaluable role the Laboratory Directed Research and Development [LDRD] program provides to the Federal Government and the Nation in general. Discretionary LDRD investments have been and will continue to be responsive to the energy needs of the Nation, as evidenced by recent R&D projects in materials science, optoelectronics, computer science, and high energy density physics. Cutting-edge LDRD research provides the science base for energy-specific applications such as fuel cells, hydrogen technologies, carbon management, nuclear energy and solid state lighting. In addition, LDRD is the national labs' most important tool for maintaining the vitality of the national labs in support of other national security missions. LDRD enables the labs to hire the ``best and brightest'' young scientists and engineers and allows them to seek innovative science and technology solutions for current or emerging national security issues, including those of energy security. LDRD investments have been effective in providing solutions for today's energy problems and demonstrate the inherent flexibility of the program to provide national security mission support on a very timely basis. Energy climate research needs can best be addressed by continuing a vibrant LDRD program at the national laboratories. Reprogramming Guidelines The Committee requires the Department to promptly and fully inform the Committee when a change in program execution or funding is required during the fiscal year. A reprogramming includes the reallocation of funds from one activity to another within an appropriation, or any significant departure from a program, project, or activity described in the agency's budget justification, as presented to and approved or modified by Congress in an appropriations act or the accompanying statement of managers or report. For construction projects, a reprogramming constitutes the reallocation of funds from one construction project identified in the justifications to another or a significant change in the scope of an approved project. Reprogrammings should not be employed to initiate new programs or to change program, project, or activity allocations specifically denied, limited, or increased by Congress in the act or report. In cases where unforeseen events or conditions are deemed to require such changes, proposals shall be submitted in advance to the Committee and be fully explained and justified. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Appropriations, 2008.................................... $1,722,407,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 1,255,393,000 Committee recommendation................................ 1,928,259,000 The Committee recommendation is $1,928,259,000 for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, $672,866,000 above the President's request. The Department's request for the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy program is $467,014,000 less than the fiscal year 2008 appropriation. The reduction is driven by the complete elimination of the Weatherization Assistance Program (-$227,222,000), but also reflects large cuts to Hydrogen R&D (-$64,849,000) and the National Renewable Energy Laboratories Facilities and Infrastructure (-$62,194,000) subprograms. This Committee continues to support a broad and ambitious research, development and deployment program that covers a variety of technological approaches to solve this Nation's energy problems. Our recommendation, therefore, restores most of the administration's reductions and increases some areas beyond the request. In addition, this Committee recognizes that the Department may carry out international cooperative agreements, including the U.S.- Israeli energy cooperation agreement as described in the Energy Independence and Security Act, section 917, as long as these agreements are consistent with activities described in the congressional budget justification. The Committee recommends $5,000,000 to support the U.S.-Israeli energy cooperation agreement. Local Government and Tribal Technology Demonstrations.--The Committee provides $50,000,000 and recommends establishment of a new, competitive grant program that funds city government- led, county government-led, and/or tribal nations-led demonstration projects capable of reducing electricity demand involving public and private partnerships. The Department shall prioritize projects that have substantial local cost-share match, that are replicable in the future under market conditions after demonstration of cost/benefit advantages, and that meet goals of greenhouse gas and/or water use reductions. The Committee recommends that each project achieve at least a 50 percent reduction in energy usage. The Committee recommends each grant not exceed $5,000,000 per project and the total Federal share of each project be capped at 50 percent. Hydrogen Technology.--The Committee recommends $175,000,000, a total of $28,787,000 above the request. The Committee agrees with the Department's proposal to transfer several subprograms from the Hydrogen budget to the Vehicles Technology budget in fiscal year 2009. With this increase, the Committee's recommendation for all hydrogen programs in the Department's fiscal year 2009 budget amounts to $296,500,000. Of the increased funding, $22,000,000 is applied to Hydrogen Production and Delivery R&D, which supports development of hydrogen fuel from various sources such as wind, solar, or biomass. While the program has used natural gas to meet the 2015 production-cost goal, clearly that is not enough. Renewable hydrogen remains a critical element of our future energy system and our Nation's security. A total of $11,500,000 is provided for Systems Analysis, $3,787,000 above the request, so that model validation refinement and analysis of selected cross-cutting issues for multiple production pathways is not deferred, as proposed by the administration. Finally, $3,000,000 is provided for Manufacturing R&D, which is $3,000,000 above the request. Manufacturing R&D must be conducted in parallel with technology development to commercialize new technologies through a domestic supplier base as expeditiously as possible. Biomass and Biorefinery Systems R&D.--The Committee recommends $235,000,000, an increase of $10,000,000 above the request. With the additional funds, the Department should pursue development of biofuels from non-food sources, especially those with the largest potential to sequester industrial carbon-dioxide, such as algae, that are also compatible with gasoline and diesel fuels. These biofuels will be developed from a variety of renewable feedstocks, including algae, that exhibit greater than 50 percent greenhouse gas benefits compared to conventional hydrocarbon fuels. This research should include demonstrations using brackish water. The Committee also recommends that the Department expand its Thermochemical Platform research and development to focus on conversion of biomass to bio-crude, particularly upgrading these bio-crudes to refinery grade feedstocks that compliment the existing petroleum refining and fuel distribution infrastructure. This expanded research and development program is an important part of expanding research collaboration between the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Washington State University, in a new Bioproducts, Sciences and Engineering Laboratory in Richland, Washington. Solar Energy.--The Committee recommends $229,000,000, an increase of $72,880,000 over the President's request. A total of $59,495,000 of this increase is transferred from the Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences program. The distribution of the $229,000,000 for Solar Energy is as follows: $156,833,000 for Photovoltaic Energy Systems; $50,000,000 for Concentrating Solar Power; and $22,167,000 for Solar Heating and Lighting. Wind Energy.--The recommendation is $62,500,000, an increase of $10,000,000 over the request. With the increase, this office should work with the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability to develop better models and transmission interconnection systems with the purpose of increasing the ease of adding electricity from wind to the grid. The Committee has provided a budget increase in the Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability program to assist the Wind Energy program by providing support for the key area of transmission, which is needed to take electricity generated by wind power to the marketplace. Within available funds, the program shall establish a manufacturing initiative jointly with the Industrial Technologies Program focusing on manufacturing issues for the rapidly growing wind energy industry. Geothermal Technology.--The recommendation for Geothermal Technology is $30,000,000, the same as the administration's request, which is already $10,182,000 above fiscal year 2008. The Committee understands that workforce and educational activities are critical to the future of the geothermal industry, and the Department's future budget requests should include funding for these needs. The Committee encourages the Department to focus its efforts on research and development of Enhanced Geothermal Systems. However, we recognize that there is significant near term crossover benefit for both the enhanced and existing hydrothermal systems--for example, through pursuit of geothermal mapping, existing hydrothermal systems marketers may find new areas to place capacity. Water Power Energy R&D.--The Committee recommends $30,000,000, a total of $27,000,000 above the request. With the additional funding, this Committee directs the Department to accelerate the comprehensive resource assessment of water power in the United States and accelerate the technology characterizations, with the goal of completing them in fiscal year 2009, 1 year sooner than projected in the budget. The Department should also carry out the establishment of one National Marine Renewable Energy Research, Development, and Demonstration Center as described in the Energy Independence and Security Act [EISA], section 634. The Committee recognizes ocean and tidal power research efforts as identified in the EISA and directs the Department, working with the Department of Commerce, as indicated in EISA section 633, to utilize the DOE's only marine sciences laboratory to undertake a research and development program to expand marine and hydrokinetic renewable energy programs. Vehicle Technologies.--The Committee provides $293,000,000, an increase of $71,914,000 over the request. Consistent with the EISA section 641(g), the Committee provides an additional $50,543,000, for a new total of $100,000,000, for vehicle energy storage systems demonstrations aimed at developing novel, high capacity energy storage, onboard management, integration into electric drive vehicle platforms and the grid, and new technologies and processes that reduce manufacturing costs. These cost-shared demonstrations are to be conducted through consortia. Another $15,000,000 of the increase is provided to Fuels Technology subprogram, bringing its total to $31,122,000. These funds will expand and accelerate testing of intermediate fuel blends (15 percent-20 percent ethanol mixed with 80 percent-85 percent gasoline) on vehicles, other engines, and infrastructure components to provide data on how these blends may affect materials, durability, performance, and emissions and alleviate supply/demand imbalances. Work should be done in coordination with the Biomass Program. The remaining $6,371,000 of the increase is provided to the Safety Codes and Standards subprogram to facilitate efforts in quantitative risk assessment, component and system level testing, leak detection technologies, and fuel quality R&D, for a variety of fuels and technologies. Finally, the Department is directed to continue research efforts in the area of computational predictive engineering of lightweight thermoplastic polymer composites. Building Technologies.--The Committee provides $176,481,000, an increase of $52,716,000 over the request. Commercial Buildings Integration is increased $27,000,000 to a total of $40,000,000, for expansion of partnerships with leading laboratories, universities, and DOE selected consortia, consistent with EISA section 422. Emerging Technologies is provided an increase of $10,000,000, for a new total of $49,465,000. The entire $10,000,000 is for solid state lighting research and development. Residential Buildings Integration is provided a $5,000,000 increase, for a new total of $31,900,000. The increased funding will enable the program to move more quickly into testing strategies that achieve a 50 percent reduction in the energy used in a home. Technology Validation and Market Introduction is increased $9,716,000, for a new total of $34,116,000. Of this increase, $8,000,000 is for building energy codes for continued assistance to States and the balance of $1,716,000 is for expansion of the Energy Star labeling for energy efficient and renewable technologies that deliver energy savings and reduced emissions. The remaining $1,000,000 of the increase is provided to evaluate models for accelerating and advancing appliance standards and test procedures, specifically evaluating international regulatory models that can be considered for adoption in the United States. Industrial Technologies.--The Committee provides $65,119,000, an increase of $3,000,000 over the request. The increase provides for organizing a cross-cutting manufacturing initiative for clean energy technologies developed in other Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy programs, including wind turbine gearboxes, carbon fiber and other lightweight materials for automotive applications, sensors and controls, and other technologies that benefit from improved manufacturing techniques. Federal Energy Management Program.--The Committee recommends $22,000,000, the same as the request. Facilities and Infrastructure.--The Committee recommends $36,982,000, an increase of $23,000,000 above the budget request. The Department is directed to use $12,000,000 of the increase to execute an existing memorandum of agreement with Sandia National Laboratories for supercomputing equipment and capacity to support the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy-based mission needs. Numerical simulation on high performance computers enables the study of complex engineering systems and natural phenomena that would be too expensive, or even impossible, to study by direct experimentation. This resource will be located at Sandia to take advantage of the more than 20 years of experience with high performance computing hardware and software development. The Committee expects both laboratories to contribute in their respective areas of scientific and engineering excellence. The remaining $11,000,000 is provided for continuing two construction projects at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory--$4,000,000 is provided for the Energy Systems Integration Facility, bringing the total funding for the project to $8,000,000; $7,000,000 is provided for the South Table Mountain Infrastructure project, which is $7,000,000 above the request. Weatherization Assistance Program.--The Committee provides $201,181,000, a total of $201,181,000 above the request. Of that amount, $200,000,000 is for weatherization grants and $1,181,000 is for training and technical assistance. Intergovernmental Activities.--The Committee provides $50,000,000 for the State Energy Program Grants, $6,000,000 for Tribal Energy Activities and $5,000,000 for Renewable Energy Production Incentives. Program Direction.--The Committee recommends $121,846,000, the same as the budget request, which will assist the Office by providing 30 new hires to fill critical skill gaps commensurate with the technical workload increases to programs. Program Support.--The Committee recommends $15,000,000, which is $5,000,000 less than the request, but still $4,199,000 above the fiscal year 2008 enacted appropriation. The Committee supports the program's efforts to enhance its Planning, Analysis, and Evaluation subprogram and especially its efforts to improve its Technology Advancement and Outreach subprogram, but because of overall budget constraints cannot fully support the request. Use of Prior Year Balances.--The Committee does not accept the proposal to reduce this request by using $738,000 of prior year uncosted balances. Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee includes $124,150,000 for the following list of projects that provide for research, development, and demonstration of energy efficiency or renewable energy technologies or programs. The Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost sharing requirements may apply to these projects. CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Committee Project recommendation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Algal-Base Renewable Energy for Nevada, Desert Research 750,000 Institute, Reno, NV for the development of algal-based energy system.......................................... Alternative Energy for Higher Education, Creighton $1,200,000 University, Omaha, NE, for a solar energy project...... Alternative Energy School of the Future, Clark County, 1,250,000 Andre Agassi Charitable Foundation, Las Vegas, NV, for a solar fuel cell system............................... Alternative Fuel Cell Membranes for National Energy 1,000,000 Independence, University of Southern Mississippi, USM, MS, for advanced fuel cell membrane research........... Anaerobic Digester and Combined Heat Power Project, 600,000 Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, Montgomery and Prince George's Counties, MD, for a study on anaerobic power generation....................................... Bioenergy and Bioproducts Laboratory, Auburn University, 1,000,000 Auburn, AL, to conduct research on biofuel conversion, biofuel testing, and certification..................... Bioenergy Demonstration Project: Value-Added Products 2,000,000 from Renewable Fuels, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, for research on the byproducts of biofuel production............................................. Biogas Center of Excellence, Michigan Economic 1,000,000 Development Corporation, Flint, MI, for a center for the production of biogas............................... Biomass Energy Resources Center, Biomass Energy Resource 1,500,000 Center, Montpelier, VT, for the installation of new small scale technology................................. Biomass Gasification Research and Development Project, 1,000,000 Port of Benton, Richland, WA, for the gasification and research of biomass.................................... Biorefinery for Ethanol, Chemicals, Animal Feed and 1,000,000 Biomaterials from Sugarcane Bagasse, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, for a biomass conversion project............................. Bipolar Wafer Cell NiMH Lithium Ion Battery, Electro 2,000,000 Energy, Danbury, CT, to advance wafer cell battery technology............................................. Carbon Neutral Green Campus, Nevada State College, Clark 250,000 County, NV for environmental sustainability............ Center for Biomass Utilization, University of North 2,000,000 Dakota Energy and Environmental Research Center, Grand Forks, ND, for research on biomass production and its byproducts............................................. Center for Nanoscale Energy, North Dakota State 5,000,000 University, Fargo, ND, for nanomaterials research...... Central Vermont Recovered Biomass Facility, Vermont 1,000,000 Sustainable Jobs Fund, Montpelier, VT, for a digester system................................................. Chariton Valley Densification--Phase II, Chariton Valley 1,000,000 RC&D, Inc, Centerville, IA, for research on switchgrass Christmas Valley Renewable Energy Development, Oregon 400,000 Department of Energy, Salem, OR, for the development of a renewable energy-producing facility.................. City of Miami Green Initiative, City of Miami, Miami, 1,000,000 FL, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and fuel consumption in the city................................ Clean Power Energy Research Consortium, Nicholls State 2,000,000 University, Louisiana State University, University of New Orleans, Tulane University, Southern University, University of Louisiana, Thibodeaux, LA, for a joint venture of Louisiana universities to promote alternative fuels...................................... Clean Technology Commercialization Initiative, Ben 1,000,000 Franklin Technology Partners, Harrisburg, PA, to support clean and alternative energy technologies...... Coastal Ohio Wind Project, Bowling Green State 1,000,000 University, Bowling Green, OH, for wind energy research Consortium for Plant Biotechnology Research, The 1,000,000 Consortium for Plant Biotechnology Research, Inc., St. Simons Island, N/A, to support university-industry research and technology transfer projects.............. Cooling Heating and Power and Bio-Fuel Application 2,000,000 Center, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, to conduct research on increased energy efficiency through the use of electric and thermal delivery systems....................................... Development of Biofuels Using Ionic Transfer Membranes, 600,000 University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Clark County, NV for biofuels research...................................... Development of High Yield Tropical Feedstocks, 1,500,000 University of Hawaii, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, Honolulu, HI, for a tropical bioenergy project...................................... Dueco Plug-In Hybrid Engines, Dueco Inc., Waukesha, WI, 2,000,000 for new plug-in hybrid electric propulsion technology.. Energy Production Through Anaerobic Digestion, New 500,000 Jersey Department of Agriculture, Trenton, NJ, for anaerobic digester technology.......................... Fluid Flow Optimization of Aerogel Blanket Manufacturing 1,500,000 Process, Aspen Aerogels, Northborough, MA, for energy- efficient insulation research.......................... Forestry biofuel statewide Collaboration Center, 1,500,000 Michigan Economic Development Corporation, Upper Peninsula, MI, to improve the supply chain for woody biomass................................................ Genetic Improvements of Switchgrass, University of Rhode 1,500,000 Island at Kingston, Kingston, RI, to improve switchgrass for use as a biofuel....................... Geothermal Power Generation Plant, Oregon Institute of 1,600,000 Technology (OIT), Klamath Falls, OR, for a geothermal power plant............................................ Great Basin Center for Geothermal Energy, University of 650,000 Nevada, Reno, NV, to continue and expand the Center's activities in promoting geothermal power............... Great Plains Wind Power Test Facility, Texas Tech 2,000,000 University, Lubbock, TX, for the testing, characterization, and improvement of grid-connected wind turbines and wind-driven water desalination systems................................................ Hawaii-New Mexico Sustainable Energy Security 3,000,000 Partnership, Hawaii Natural Energy Institute, Honolulu,, HI, to continue the analysis and technology efforts of the Partnership............................. Hollow Glass Microspheres, University of Nevada, Las 550,000 Vegas, Clark County, NV for hydrogen storage methods research............................................... Hydroelectric Power Generation, Quincy, City of Quincy, 500,000 Quincy, IL, for Quincy's efforts to install hydroelectric plants at locks and dams................. Hydrogen Storage System for Vehicular Propulsion, 1,500,000 Delaware State U., Dover, Delaware State University, Dover, DE, to develop a hydrogen storage system........ Integrated Solar Energy Windows, PPG Industries, 1,000,000 Pittsburgh, PA, for the development of next generation, transparent photovoltaic (PV) solar cells.............. Integrated Sustainability Initiative, University of 1,000,000 Nevada, Reno, NV, to promote campus sustainability..... Kansas Biofuels Certification Laboratory, University of 1,000,000 Kansas, Lawrence, KS, for analysis of biofuels, measuring emissions of biofuels, and research of biofuel cells.......................................... La Samilla Solar Trough Storage Project, Sandia National 2,000,000 Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, for solar trough storage advancement............................................ Landfill Gas Utilization Plant, County of Chautauqua, 2,000,000 Chautauqua County, NY, for landfill-gas power generation............................................. Lightweight Composites for Heavy-Duty Vehicles and 500,000 Hydrogen Storage, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, to advance the use of lightweight composite materials for vehicles................................. Maine Tidal Power Initiative, University of Maine, 1,000,000 Orono, ME, to develop protocols that allow locations in northern New England to be prioritized for tidal energy development............................................ MidSouth/Southeast Bioenergy Consortium, MidSouth/ 1,500,000 Southeast Bioenergy Consortium, Fayetteville, AR, for research on the byproducts of biofuel production....... Multifunctional Solar Energy Systems Research, Utah 1,000,000 State University, Logan, UT, for research and development of multifunctional electricity-producing systems................................................ National Agriculture-Based Industrial Lubricants (NABL), 600,000 Biomass (IA), University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA, for the advancement of biobased industrial and automotive lubricants and for biofuels services........ National Center for Commercialization of Bioenergy, 750,000 Kansas State University, Olathe, KS, for the commercialization of near market bioenergy technologies to meet national renewable fuel mandates............... National Wind Energy Center, University of Houston, 2,000,000 Houston, TX, to focus on developing advanced offshore wind technology for cost-effective, renewable clean energy production...................................... Nevada Institute for Renewable Energy Commercialization, 500,000 Incline Village, NV, for the promotion of renewable energy in business..................................... New School Green Building, The New School, New York, NY, 2,000,000 for an environmentally friendly school facility........ North Carolina Center for Automotive Research, North 1,000,000 Carolina Center for Automotive Research, Jackson, NC, to equip the Chassis Dynamics Laboratory............... Offshore Renewable Energy, Rhode Island Coastal 700,000 Resources Management Council, Wakefield, RI, to develop an Ocean Special Area Management Plan.................. Ohio Advanced Energy Manufacturing Center (OAEMC), 1,000,000 Edison Welding Institute, Columbus, OH, for an advanced energy manufacturing program........................... Oregon Solar Highway, Oregon Department of 1,000,000 Transportation, Salem, OR, to demonstrate the feasibility of large-scale deployment of solar photovoltaic technology................................ Pecos Valley Biomass Energy Project, NM, Clark County 2,500,000 School District, Roswell, NM, for a bio-methane gas system................................................. Placer County Biomass Utilization Pilot Project, Placer 1,500,000 County, Auburn, CA, for a biomass facility............. Pope/Douglas Third Combuster Expansion, Pope/Douglas 1,000,000 Solid Waste Management, Alexandria, MN, to increase waste to energy capacity............................... Power Grid Reliability and Security, Washington State 1,000,000 University, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, to create solutions for grid reliability and security enhancements........................................... Renewable Energy Clean Air Project, County of 700,000 Koochiching, International Falls, MN, for syn-gas energy production...................................... Renewable Energy Development Venture, Pacific 2,500,000 International Center for High Technology Research, Honolulu, HI, to expand potential energy resources in the State of Hawaii.................................... Renewable Energy Feasibility Study, City of Trenton, 500,000 Trenton, NJ, to examine possible renewable energy sources................................................ Renewable Energy Integration and Development, Clark and 2,000,000 Washoe Counties, Nevada System of Higher Education (NSHE), Las Vegas, NV, for a renewable energy center... Renewable/Sustainable Biomass Project, Alaska Village 500,000 Initiatives, Alaska, AK, for use of biomass for energy generation in rural Alaska villages.................... Sandia National Lab Concentrating Solar, Sandia National 3,000,000 Lab, Albuquerque, NM, for concentrating solar activities............................................. Solar Panels and Environmental Education, County of 1,000,000 Essex, Newark, NJ, for the installation of solar panels to further environmental education..................... Solar Park Pilot Project, City of St. Petersburg, St. 1,000,000 Petersburg, FL, to develop a renewable energy plan for the City's parks....................................... Solar Power Generation, Township of Cherry Hill, Cherry 300,000 Hill, NJ, for solar technology......................... Solar Thermal Demonstration Project, Clark County School 1,250,000 District, Clark County, NV, for solar technology for schools................................................ Southern Regional Center for Lightweight Innovative 4,000,000 Design, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, to reduce emissions and posture the US for less reliance on foreign oil........................... Southwest Alaska Regional Geothermal Energy Project, 3,000,000 Naknek Electrical Association, Naknek, AK, for an exploratory well for a 25MW geothermal plant to serve villages in rural Alaska............................... Stamford Waste-to-Energy Project (CT), City of Stamford, 2,000,000 Stamford, CT, to convert dried sludge into clean, renewable energy....................................... Strategic Biomass Initiative, Mississippi Technology 500,000 Alliance, Jackson, MS, to encourage bioenergy industry in the southeast....................................... Sun Grant Initiative, South Dakota State University, 4,000,000 Brookings, SD, for regional biomass feedstock research and education.......................................... Sustainable Energy for Homes and Businesses, Vermont 750,000 Department of Public Service, Montpelier, VT, to support Vermont's wind and solar program............... Sustainable Energy for Vermont Schools Competition, 900,000 Vermont Superintendents Association, Montpelier, VT, for school-based projects to highlight sustainable energy technologies.................................... Sustainable Energy Research Center, Mississippi State 10,500,000 University, Mississippi State, MS, to develop new engineering and scientific knowledge and serve as a catalyst to create sustainable energy industries in the southeastern United States............................. Sustainable Las Vegas, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 1,000,000 Clark County, NV to increase conservation and sustainability in Las Vegas............................ The Institute for Energy, Environment and 750,000 Sustainability, Johnson County Community College, Overland Park, KS, to serve as a resource for local education, business and civic entities and would include education and training in renewable energy..... Thin Film Photovoltaic Research & Development, Omega 1,000,000 Optical, Brattleboro, VT, to research solar panel technology............................................. Tidal Energy Study, Snohomish County PUD No. 1, Everett, 500,000 WA, for environmental studies of possible tidal energy pilot plants........................................... Transportable Emissions Testing Lab, West Virginia 1,000,000 University, Morgantown, WV, for mobile labs that test bus emissions.......................................... USD Catalysis Group for Alternative Energy, South Dakota 1,100,000 Catalysis Group, Vermilion, SD, for the development of metal oxide and carbon catalyzed reactions technologies Vermont Biofuels Initiative, Vermont Sustainable Jobs 1,500,000 Fund, Montpelier, VT, to test the feasibility of different uses of biodiesel............................ Wind Turbine Model and Pilot Project for Alternative 1,500,000 Energy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, for a shore- side wind turbine...................................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Appropriations, 2008.................................... $138,556,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 134,000,000 Committee recommendation................................ 166,900,000 The Committee recommendation for Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability is $166,900,000, an increase of $32,900,000 above the request. Of the increase, $10,000,000 is provided for Visualization and Controls, bringing the program total to $35,305,000, to accelerate the development of a resilient power grid through inherently secure control systems and wide-area monitoring tools. Additional funds help implement a national wide-area grid monitoring system in support of the independent system operators. Another $4,000,000 of the increase is applied to the Energy Storage and Power Electronics line, bringing that subprogram total to $17,403,000. The increase supports enhanced efforts on power electronic activities. Finally, an additional $6,000,000 is provided for Renewable and Distributed Systems Integration subprogram, bringing the total to $39,306,000. This funding supports renewable energy grid integration activities facilitating increased deployment of renewables and other clean energy sources to power our Nation. In particular, the Committee encourages continuation of the electricity transmission, distribution, and energy assurance activities including the Modern Grid Initiative, and its Phase 2 Development Field Tests for the Allegheny Power Initiative, and encourages the Department to continue research and development in grid reliability and renewable energy integration at the Electricity Infrastructure Operations Center at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee includes $12,900,000 above the request for the following list of projects that provide for research, development, and demonstration of electricity delivery and energy reliability technologies or programs. The Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost sharing requirements may apply to these projects. CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY PROJECTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Committee Project recommendation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Alternate Fuel for Cement Processing, Auburn University, $1,500,000 Auburn, AL, to focus on the integration of the burning process into existing kiln systems in Lafarge plants, maximization of burn efficiency and minimization of waste/discharge........................................ Center of Excellence Lab, Bismarck State College, 1,400,000 Bismarck, ND, to develop a state-of-the art lab........ Energy Development and Reliability, Bismarck State 300,000 College, Bismarck, ND, to promote and advance the region's energy industry............................... Integrated Distribution Management System, Southern 1,500,000 Company, Birmingham, AL, to provide seamlessly integrated set of information systems providing all of the major functionality needed to operate an electric distribution system.................................... Iowa Stored Energy Plant, Iowa Associations of Municipal 1,500,000 Utilities, Ankeny, IA, for compressed air energy storage project........................................ Navajo Electrification Demonstration Program, Navajo 2,000,000 Tribal Utility Authority, Fort Defiance, AZ, to provide electric power to homes on the reservation............. North Dakota Energy Workforce Development, Bismarck 1,900,000 State College, Bismarck, ND, for a workforce development programs................................... San Mateo County Solar Genesis Project, County of San 1,500,000 Mateo, Redwood City, CA, for a solar power electric generation facility.................................... SmartGrid Integration Lab, Colorado State University, 1,000,000 Ft. Collins, CO, to demonstrate core smart grid capabilities........................................... Technology Development, Red River Valley Research 300,000 Corridor, Grand Forks, ND, to promote and advance the research, development and commercialization activities occurring in North Dakota's Red River Valley Research Corridor............................................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nuclear Energy Appropriations, 2008.................................... $961,665,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 853,644,000 Committee recommendation................................ 803,000,000 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Committee recommendation for nuclear energy research and development includes a total of $803,000,000. Integrated University Program.--The Committee provides $15,000,000 for a new Integrated University Program. The Committee is concerned about the lack of stable support for the nuclear engineering programs across the Nation. The Office of Nuclear Energy's University Program has been repeatedly restructured and elements of this program where moved to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission last year. To be the effective source of innovation and highly trained engineers and scientists that the Nation needs, our nuclear engineering programs must have sustained support for multiyear research projects and modern curricula. The needs go beyond nuclear energy with pressing shortfalls in trained professionals capable of supporting crucial nuclear nonproliferation missions such as nuclear forensics and international safeguards. The Committee provides the Office of Nuclear Energy [NE], the Nuclear Regulatory Commission [NRC], and Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation [DNN] $15,000,000 each (for a total of $45,000,000) for a new Integrated University Program. Of this amount, $10,000,000 shall be used by each organization to support university research and development in areas relevant to the organization's mission; and $5,000,000 will be used by each organization to support a Nuclear Science and Engineering Grant Program. The Grant Program will be coordinated and jointly implemented by the NE, NRC, and DNN. It will support multiyear research projects that do not align with programmatic missions but are critical to maintaining the discipline of nuclear science and engineering. The Office of Nuclear Energy shall provide a report to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees on how the NE, NRC, and DNN will coordinate the Integrated University Program and provide a stable source of funding for nuclear engineering university programs. Nuclear Power 2010.--The Committee recommends $241,600,000 to support the development of license applications for new nuclear power plant designs under the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's combined Construction and Operating License process. This is the same amount as the budget request. Generation IV.--The Committee recommends $70,000,000 for the Generation IV nuclear energy systems initiative, the same as the request. Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative.--The Committee recommends $10,000,000 for nuclear hydrogen research and development. Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative.--The Committee recommends $229,700,000 for the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative to support the development of advanced spent fuel separation processes and fuel fabrication technologies. The funds should support a balanced portfolio of technologies for managing actinide inventories utilizing both fast and thermal reactors. Improving methods and capabilities for developing and qualifying recycled fuels should be priority. Advanced materials modeling and simulation capabilities should be utilized to aid this effort. No funding is provided for grid appropriate reactors. The Committee, consistent with the recommendation in the Fiscal year 2008 Conference report, continues to provide additional investment in laboratory facilities. Within the available funds, $15,000,000 is provided to support upgrades to Los Alamos hot cells and the materials test station, and $15,000,000 to Oak Ridge to upgrade its radiological facilities. RADIOLOGICAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT Radiological Facilities.--The Committee recommends $41,000,000, an increase of $2,300,000. The additional $2,300,000 will be added to the ``Research reactor infrastructure'' program for a total of $6,000,000 to support university research reactors, including reactor instrumentation and equipment upgrades. IDAHO FACILITIES MANAGEMENT The Committee recommends $119,700,000, an increase of $15,000,000 to support nuclear research and development at the Idaho National Laboratory. Funds will be used to support the Advanced Test Reactor National Scientific User Facility program at INL. These funds will support university and industry related research programs and allow for capability enhancements to support nuclear fuels and materials research. The funds will also be used for maintenance and infrastructure investment to support the INL mission as a preeminent nuclear energy R&D laboratory. PROGRAM DIRECTION The Committee recommends $73,000,000 for Program Direction, a decrease of $7,500,000. The decrease is based upon the Committee's decision to put the Mixed Oxide Facility under the Nuclear Nonproliferation program. Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee includes $3,000,000 for the following list of projects. CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED NUCLEAR ENERGY PROJECTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Committee Project recommendation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Technologies Ventures Corporation, Technologies Ventures $3,000,000 Corporation, Albuquerque, NM, for technology transfer activities............................................. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY (TRANSFER OF FUNDS) The Committee recommends the transfer of funds of $149,000,000 in the Clean Coal Technology to fossil energy research and development. Fossil Energy Research and Development Appropriations, 2008.................................... $742,838,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 754,030,000 Committee recommendation................................ 876,730,000 The Committee recommendation for Fossil Energy Research and Development is $876,730,000, an increase of $122,700,000 above the request. The Committee believes that the Department has failed to recognize and stress the importance of restoring a sustained and balanced commitment to fossil energy research and development. The Committee feels that the Department has failed to fully recognize the significance of the Carbon Sequestration Program as evidenced in recent findings of a panel of scientific experts from the International Energy Agency [IEA]. The IEA validated that the Department's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships and their large-scale CO<INF>2</INF> tests are the world's most ambitious. The Committee has provided additional funding to sustain technology development and to send a clear message that the Congress is serious about making a long-term investment in fossil energy. Clean Coal Power Initiative.--The Committee recommends $232,300,000 for the Clean Coal Power Initiative. The Committee is disappointed that the Department has underfunded its commitment and thus delayed the current and future rounds of the Clean Coal Power Initiative. This lack of commitment leaves an even wider gap in the development and demonstration of advanced clean coal technologies. These technology advancements are critically important for addressing the existing fleet of coal-fired power plants as well as the next generation of fossil-fuel powered facilities. The Committee anticipates that more than $600,000,000 will be available for the Round 3 solicitation and encourages the Department to proceed with issuing this solicitation for carbon capture and storage and innovative uses of carbon dioxide. The Office of Fossil Energy is required to provide the Committee a status report on all nine awarded projects for the Clean Coal Power Initiative's Round 1 and 2, including completed and ongoing projects. FutureGen.--The Committee recommends no funding for the FutureGen account. The Committee has supported the technical and scientific efforts behind the FutureGen initiative for the past 5 years but does not support funding for the ``restructured'' effort this year. The Committee has instead provided funds for the Clean Coal Power Initiative at a level of $147,300,000 more than the budget request. The Committee has distributed the remaining $8,700,000 of the budget request within Fossil Energy Research and Development. The Committee understands that $134,000,000 of unobligated balances remain in this account and are set aside for future use with this program but are not available until March 2009. Fuels and Power Systems.--The Committee recommends $412,132,000 for fuels and power systems, an increase of $29,400,000. The recommendation includes $50,000,000 for Innovations for Existing Plants [IEP]. The IEP program is directed to continue carbon capture research for the existing fleet. Of the IEP funds, $12,000,000 is for Federal laboratories, in collaboration with research institutions, to continue to conduct research and development on the critical link between water and fossil energy extraction and utilization and how different regions of the country can employ water efficiency technology. In light of the new Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Committee supports $5,000,000 in additional research for a broader mercury program. The Committee understands the Department has been moving forward on the Ramgen Compression Initiative, and it is the Committee's expectation that the Department fully complete the development and testing of the Ramgen CO<INF>2</INF> compressor. The Committee recommends $63,000,000 for the Advanced Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle activities and $30,000,000 for Advanced Turbines. The Committee recommends $149,132,000 for Carbon Sequestration activities. Additional funds are needed for the Regional Partnerships to carry out the large-scale projects that were awarded in fiscal year 2008 into field activities, in order to accelerate wide-scale deployment of advanced clean coal technologies with carbon capture and storage. The Committee encourages the Office of Fossil Energy to continue research on the co-sequestration of carbon dioxide and criteria pollutants with other offices and agencies. The Office of Fossil Energy shall be the lead office for these activities. Within available funds, the Department is encouraged to study geologic resources that have the potential to be regionally and nationally significant in order to reduce data gaps. Within in available funds for Carbon Sequestration, the Committee encourages the program to continue to study carbon dioxide accelerated growth algae technology to recycle carbon and produce fuels. The Committee recommends $30,000,000 for Fuels to support both fuels from coal liquids and hydrogen. Within available funds for Fuels, the Committee recommendation includes adequate funding to continue the integrated coal and biomass research activity to address carbon emissions and technology barrier issues. The Committee recommends $60,000,000 for Fuel Cell Research. The Committee recommends $30,000,000 for Advanced Research. Of this funding, $5,000,000 is for computational energy sciences. Natural Gas Technologies.--The Committee recommendation includes $20,000,000. Of this amount, $15,000,000 is provided for methane hydrates, and $5,000,000 is for research to continue to develop technology solutions to minimize the impact, or develop treatment technologies for produced water as a by-product of natural gas production. Oil Technology.--The Committee recommends $5,000,000 for Oil Technology. Of this funding, the Committee recommends $1,200,000 to continue support for the Risk Based Management System, a nationwide database for oil and gas regulations and technology developments. The Committee recommends the continuation of the stripper well program. Program Direction.--The Committee recommends $152,804,000 for Program Direction, of which $122,054,000 is for the National Energy Technology Laboratory. Other Programs.--The Committee recommends $9,700,000 for fossil energy environmental restoration. The Committee recommendation is $656,000 for the special recruitment program. The Committee recommendation for plant and capital equipment is $17,748,000, of which $9,848,000 is to be directed to the Morgantown site, $6,900,000 to the Pittsburgh site, and $1,000,000 to the Albany site. The Committee recommendation for cooperative research and development is $5,000,000. The Committee continues to support the Department's project management efforts and the role of the National Energy Technology Laboratory [NETL], with assistance from the Golden field office, in setting up a successful Project Management Center [PMC]. The Committee encourages the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy to continue the collaboration and funding of the PMC with the NETL. Use of Prior Year Balances.--The Committee supports the use of prior year balances in the amount of $11,310,000 from completed or cancelled construction projects, the same as the budget request. Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee recommendation includes $32,700,000 for the following congressionally directed projects. CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED FOSSIL ENERGY PROJECTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Committee Project recommendation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Arctic Energy Office, Arctic Energy Office, Fairbanks, $6,000,000 AK, for research in fossil energy, natural gas technologies, and oil technologies..................... Center for Zero Emissions Research and Technology, 4,500,000 Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, for research related to carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emissions, and clean power generation.................. CO2 Capture/Sequestration Research, Pennsylvania State 500,000 University, Centre County, PA, to study carbon capture and sequestration...................................... Fossil Fuel Research & Development, University of North 4,000,000 Dakota Energy and Environmental Research Center, Grand Forks, ND, to address strategic national energy issues. Gulf Of Mexico Hydrates Research Consortium, University 1,200,000 of Mississippi, University of Mississippi, MS, to develop and deploy an integrated multi-sensor station on the seafloor in the Gulf of Mexico.................. Long Term Environmental and Economic Impacts of the 500,000 Development of a Coal Liquefaction Sector in China, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, for the study of the development of commercial liquefaction plants... Multi-Year Demonstration of Carbon Sequestration in a 1,500,000 Deep Saline Reservoir, Xcel Energy, Denver, CO, to determine the feasibility of geologic CO2 sequestration in a deep saline reservoir............................. National Center for Hydrogen Technology, University of 3,000,000 North Dakota Energy and Environmental Research Center, Grand Forks, ND, for the development of hydrogen technologies........................................... Shale Oil Upgrading Utilizing Ionic Conductive 1,000,000 Membranes, Ceramatec, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, to develop processes for upgrading oil shale, making oil extract high quality and affordable.................... Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, Siemens Power Generation, 2,000,000 Pittsburgh, PA, to support development, construction, and testing of the fuel processing systems............. The Center for Advanced Separation Technology, 3,000,000 University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, to support efforts to develop new technologies that reduce the cost of separations in coal, metals, and industrial mining operations...................................... University of Kentucky Coal-Derived Low Energy Materials 1,000,000 for Sustainable Construction Project, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, to research alternative uses for coal combustion byproducts......................... Refining Capacity Study, North Dakota Association of 500,000 Rural Electric Cooperatives, Mandan, ND, to study refining capacity...................................... Utah Center for Ultra Clean Coal Utilization & Heavy Oil 4,000,000 Research, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, to continue research on the commercial viability and validity of unconventional and clean energy technologies........................................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Appropriations, 2008.................................... $20,272,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 19,099,000 Committee recommendation................................ 19,099,000 The Committee recommends $19,099,000 for fiscal year 2009, the same as the budget request for the operation of the naval petroleum and oil shale reserves. The Department is directed to operate the field as close to maximum efficiency as possible, given available funds. Strategic Petroleum Reserve Appropriations, 2008.................................... $186,757,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 344,000,000 Committee recommendation................................ 205,000,000 The Committee recommends $205,000,000 for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Of these funds, the Committee directs the Department use $31,507,000 to initiate new site expansion activities and support beyond land acquisition, consistent with the budget request. While the Committee has provided for the operation of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, it does not support any other expansion activities at this time. Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Appropriations, 2008.................................... $12,335,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 9,800,000 Committee recommendation................................ 9,800,000 The Committee recommends $9,800,000, the same as the budget request. Energy Information Administration Appropriations, 2008.................................... $95,460,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 110,595,000 Committee recommendation................................ 110,595,000 The Committee recommends $110,595,000 for the Energy Information Administration. Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup Appropriations, 2008.................................... $182,263,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 213,411,000 Committee recommendation................................ 269,411,000 For the Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup program, the Committee recommends $269,411,000, an increase of $56,000,000 above the President's request. The fiscal year 2009 program is underfunded to the point even this administration has admitted that, for the first time in its 20-year history, the cleanup budget request is insufficient to meet its existing regulatory compliance milestones. The result is non-compliance with regulatory agreements and layoffs around the cleanup complex. Thus, the Committee has had to significantly increase our mark in the hope of avoiding those consequences. Internal Reprogramming Authority.--In fiscal year 2009, Environmental Management may transfer up to $2,000,000, one time, between accounts listed below to reduce health and safety risks, gain cost savings, or complete projects, as long as a program or project is not increased or decreased by more than $2,000,000 in total during the fiscal year. This reprogramming authority may not be used to initiate new programs or to change funding levels for programs specifically denied, limited, or increased by Congress in the act or report. The Committee on Appropriations in the House of Representatives and the Senate must be notified within 30 days after the use of this internal reprogramming authority. The following is a list of account control points for internal reprogramming purposes: West Valley Demonstration Project; Gaseous Diffusion Plants; Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility Decontamination and Decommissioning; Small Sites; and transfers between construction line item(s) and the operating budget within the same site, as applicable. West Valley Demonstration Project.--The Committee includes $72,900,000 for West Valley, $15,300,000 above the budget request. The Committee provides the additional funding for decontamination and decommissioning of facilities to reduce the surveillance and maintenance costs at the site. Gaseous Diffusion Plants.--The Committee recommends $92,696,000, a net increase of $11,400,000 at Paducah for completion of the Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion [DUF\6\] facility. Within the funds provided, the Committee recommends $34,959,000 for Paducah for operations and $15,400,000 to complete construction of the Depleted Uranium Facility at Paducah, for which the administration did not request any funding. The Committee shifted $4,000,000 from operations to construction activities and provided an additional $11,400,000 to complete construction in fiscal year 2009. The Committee recommends the budget request of $42,337,000 for the Portsmouth facility. The Committee remains deeply concerned by the Department's inadequate management of the DUF\6\ conversion facilities in Paducah, Kentucky and Portsmouth, Ohio. Shortly after the Committee authorized these projects, the Department estimated that construction would be completed in 2006 and operations would commence shortly thereafter. Despite the Committee's action to provide the Department all the funds requested, these facilities remain incomplete and behind schedule for startup. The Committee is concerned that continued mismanagement will significantly increase costs and needlessly delay the disposal of this hazardous material. Within 60 days of this report, the Department of Energy shall provide this Committee with a final cost and schedule estimate, a description of how it plans to meet that schedule, and how it plans to prevent similar problems in future contracts. Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility Decontamination and Decommissioning Project.--The Committee recommends $10,755,000, the same as the budget request. Small Sites.--The Committee includes $90,060,000 for fiscal year 2009, a total of $25,647,000 above the request. Within this account, the Brookhaven National Laboratory is provided $29,015,000, which is $20,582,000 above the request, to continue decontamination and decommissioning of the Graphite Research Reactor and the High Flux Beam Reactor. The Stanford Linear Accelerator Center is provided $7,883,000, which is $3,000,000 above the request, to meet a fiscal year 2009 milestone at risk due to the lack of funding in the request. Moab is provided $32,578,000, an increase of $2,065,000 above the request. The Committee provides $459,000 to Argonne, $187,000 for the California sites, $12,533,000 for the Energy Technology Engineering Center, $4,400,000 for the Idaho National Laboratory, $1,905,000 for the Los Alamos National Laboratory, and $1,100,000 for Completed Sites/Program Support, all the same as requested. The Committee has again included bill language regarding the Department's activities at the Energy Technology and Engineering Center, Santa Susana Field Laboratory, in Simi Valley, California. The Committee understands that the Department is working toward, but has not finalized the interagency agreement with the EPA as required in H.R. 2764. It is the expectation of the Committee that this agreement would provide EPA with all the funding necessary to begin the radiological site characterization survey in fiscal year 2008, and that DOE would continue its funding of the survey to its completion, as determined by EPA. The bill language requires the Department to provide EPA with the funding it requires in fiscal year 2009 for ongoing work on the survey. Uncosted Offset.--The Committee does not accept the proposal to reduce this request by using $653,000 of prior year uncosted balances. Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee recommendation includes $3,000,000 for the following congressionally directed projects. CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Committee Project recommendation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Initiative, The 1,000,000 University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, to provide data management support for research in genomics and metabolomic programs................................... Southwest Experimental Fast Oxide Reactor 2,000,000 Decommissioning [SEFOR], University of Arkansas in Fayetteville, Fayetteville, AR, for the decommissioning of SEFOR in Strickler, AR.............................. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund Appropriations, 2008.................................... $622,162,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 480,333,000 Committee recommendation................................ 515,333,000 Uranium Enrichment D&D Fund.--The Committee provides $515,333,000, a total of $35,000,000 above the budget request. Last year's budget reported that the site closure of the East Tennessee Technology Park would be completed in 2010 rather than in 2008, a 2-year slip. This budget now states that completion cannot be expected sooner than 2015, a further delay of 5 years. This Committee recognizes that this schedule slip is solely due to lack of funding in the request; and has, therefore, provided a total of $199,495,000, an increase of $15,265,000, for the decontamination and decommissioning of the East Tennessee Technology Park. The Committee recommends $115,614,000 for continued cleanup activities at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Paducah, Kentucky. This amount is the same as appropriated in fiscal year 2008 and $19,735,000 over the Department's request. The Committee is concerned that the cuts proposed in the Department's budget will harm cleanup efforts of the plant and this report includes additional funds to accelerate the decontamination and decommissioning of the C-410 building and the West End Smelter. In recent years, this Committee has provided funds above the requested amount, which have been used to accelerate important projects such as the removal of 1,900 uranium tetrafluoride drums and the disposal of all outdoor Designated Material Storage Areas. From the amounts provided, the Committee recommends the Department continue to support research activities designed to address pressing environmental remediation problems at the Paducah site and provide objective data and analysis to stakeholders such as the Department as well as State and Federal regulators. Uranium/Thorium Reimbursement.--The Committee recommends no funding for this activity, the same as the request. Science Appropriations, 2008.................................... $4,017,711,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 4,721,969,000 Committee recommendation................................ 4,640,469,000 The Committee recommends $4,640,469,000 for the Office of Science. This is $622,758,000 above fiscal year 2008 and represents the single largest increase for any program in the bill. From within available funds, the Office of Science is directed to retain the Nation's existing capability to produce a wide range of isotopes including californium-252. Consistent with the cost-sharing requirements of Public Law 101-101, the Department is directed to develop a cost recovery strategy to ensure the long-term viability of this program. HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS The Committee provides $804,960,000 for High Energy Physics. The Committee has long been a strong supporter of the Department's space-based Joint Dark Energy Mission [JDEM] and is pleased that the recent National Academy of Sciences' Beyond Einstein Program Assessment Committee [BEPAC] judged this mission to be the top priority. The Committee concurs with the view of the Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel that the cost cap recently announced may limit the scientific capabilities assumed by the BEPAC review, and that an increase in the budget beyond the current funding scenarios would be justified. The Committee recommends the full budget request of $10,030,000 for conceptual designs for Joint Dark Energy Mission. The Committee recommends full funding of the Non Accelerator Physics, University Research programs and includes $3,200,000 for EXO 200, neurtrinoless double beta decay experiments, an increase of $1,000,000 to complete construction in 2009. NUCLEAR PHYSICS The Committee provides $510,080,000 for Nuclear Physics, the same as the budget request. Within the available funds, the Committee recommends $24,900,000 for the Isotope Production and Applications program. The Committee has been frustrated with the lack of cooperation among the various Federal agencies, which has resulted in no Federal request to sustain this important responsibility in previous years. The Committee recommends $5,000,000 within the available funds for the Research Isotope Development and Production Subprogram to develop and implement a research and production strategy consistent with the National Academy of Science study entitled ``State of the Science of Nuclear Medicine.'' In developing this capability, the Department is encouraged to work with researchers and commercial customers to develop a predictable and reliable supply of isotopes. The Committee directs the Office of Science to complete a study on the feasibility of expanding the capability of the University of Missouri Research Reactor to supply up to half the United States demand for feedstock medical imaging compounds in the form of molybdenum-99 and technetium-99. The Committee also requests that the Department outline options for preserving U.S. production of californium-252. BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH The Committee provides $598,540,000 for Biological and Environmental Research, $30,000,000 more than the budget request. Biological Research.--The Committee recommends $423,613,000, an increase of $10,000,000 to support additional investment in nuclear medicine. The Committee supports the budget request of $48,500,000 for the operation and maintenance of the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory. Radiochemistry and Instrumentation.--A recent report the National Academy of Sciences, Advancing Nuclear Medicine through Innovation, recommended the enhancement of the Federal commitment to nuclear medicine research. The Committee is concerned that the Department may be looking to move this research in other directions and emphasizes its commitment to nuclear medicine medical application research at the Department of Energy. Within the funds provided, $23,121,000 is for Radiochemistry and Instrumentation. Of the $23,121,000, $17,500,000 is for nuclear medicine medical application research. The Committee emphasizes its commitment to nuclear medicine medical application research at the Department of Energy. All of the added funds must be awarded competitively in one or more solicitation that includes all sources-- universities, the private sector, and Government laboratories. The Committees support full funding for Testing and Low Dose Research. The Committees also notes that diagnostics are currently in development between the University of New Mexico [UNM] and Los Alamos National Laboratory utilizing the unique capabilities of Las Alamos National Laboratory at the IPF and LANSCE and the radiopharmaceutical expertise of UNM at the Center for Isotopes in Medicine. Climate Change Research.--The Committee recommends $174,927,000, an increase of $20,000,000 to support improved climate modeling and monitoring within the DOE-NNSA laboratories. Climate Change Modeling.--The nexus of climate and energy presents enormous challenges to our national security and to our economy. It is imperative that the United States continues to provide strong science leadership that guides policy choices and technology investments. The Committee believes the DOE-NNSA Labs are best equipped to develop and deploy a national system for science-based stewardship that combines advanced modeling, multi-scale monitoring, and impact analysis tools. These labs, with their experience in nuclear weapons nonproliferation and their unique capabilities across a wide range of technical resources are best able to develop and implement this comprehensive climate research strategy. The challenge of certifying the nuclear weapons stockpile in an era of test-ban treaties has produced one of the world's greatest computational resources through the NNSA's Stockpile Stewardship program. These computational capabilities have also been applied to the development of sophisticated global climate models that can assess climate changes far into the future. However, these models are still too coarse to resolve the details of climate change at the scale of watersheds or State boundaries, where many public policy decisions are made. In addition, the models do not capture realistically all of the complex physical processes and feedbacks between the atmosphere, ocean, and land where natural and man-made carbon fluxes are exchanged. The Committee recommends an additional $10,000,000 to support development of modeling strategies to support a comprehensive modeling program and to focus on scaling global models to regional scale to improve the predictive value of these models. Similarly, more formal information science methods must be applied to move from the current state, where predictions of climate models developed by different groups are averaged over a range of emissions scenarios, to a state where uncertainties are systematically reduced for the most important variables through deliberate validation and verification using experiments to measure sensitivities and feedbacks. These techniques have been implemented in the nuclear stockpile stewardship program to provide much stronger confidence in predictions for complex systems. The DOE-NNSA Labs can also apply their expertise in developing sensors and measurement systems to provide a comprehensive assessment of global carbon fluxes. Improved measurements must feed into models to depict the complex carbon exchanges that occur between the atmosphere, oceans, terrestrial ecosystem, and human activities at a variety of spatial and temporal scales. A global system will require remote sensing and in situ monitoring of atmospheric greenhouse gases and other chemical indicators to allow attribution of sources and sinks. Remote sensing includes satellite sensors that can observe modest changes in greenhouse gases against a high background signal. Methods to observe plume gas signatures associated with carbon fluxes will be necessary to provide source attribution information. The Committee recommends an additional $5,000,000 to support research and development of ground and space based monitoring. In order to make informed policy decision regarding our energy and water need in the future, the Committee encouraged the Department to apply Laboratory expertise in consequence analysis modeling using complex infrastructure data to assess long-term energy impacts through linkages of climate change with infrastructure. The impacts of energy choices are linked to global markets, and to our financial, energy, electrical, and transportation infrastructure. We must understand the sensitivity of this complex system to different policy options for climate change, including linkages that may lead to costly unintended consequences. The Committee recommends an additional $5,000,000 to develop decision analysis tools that can describe this system at an appropriate level of complexity and integration are required to give rapid insights at regional, national, and global scales on long-term consequences of investments at the intersection of energy technology and climate policy. Because of the inherent sensitivity of the data and potential vulnerabilities, this area requires capabilities at the national security science laboratories. BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES The Committee provides $1,415,378,000 for Basic Energy Sciences. Of these funds $145,468,000 is provided for construction activities as requested in the budget. The remaining $1,269,910,000 is for research. Within the research funds provided $17,000,000 is for the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research [EPSCoR]. Of the decrease, $59,495,000 of basic solar research is moved to the EERE solar energy research and development program. ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING RESEARCH The Committee provides $368,820,000 for Advanced Scientific Computing Research, the same as the budget request. The Committee is concerned that the Department has limited cooperation between the NNSA and DOE laboratories in supporting the advanced computing architecture and algorithm development. The Committee expects the Office of Science to continue to support joint research through the Institute for Advanced Architecture and Advanced Algorithms. FUSION ENERGY SCIENCES The Committee provides $493,050,000 for Fusion Energy Sciences, the same as the budget request. The Committee understands the Department's difficult decision to close the National Compact Stellarator Experiment [NCSX] project. The fiscal year 2009 budget request included $20,342,000 for the NCSX. The Department is directed to reallocate these funds as proposed by the Department to the Committee under Scenario II. The Committee understands this means approximately $9,000,000 will be used for orderly closeout of NCSX, $9,250,000 will be used to restore run times for three facilities and support major upgrade work at NSTX, and $2,000,000 will be used to enhance non-NCSX stellarator research. Recent advances in pulse power have renewed interest in nuclear energy systems that utilize both fusion and fission. The Committee directs the Department to work with laboratories and industry to develop a systems concept that identifies the challenges, opportunities and future research path of such a fusion-fission hybrid system. SCIENCE LABORATORIES INFRASTRUCTURE The Committee provides $110,260,000 to support infrastructure activities, the same as the budget request. The Committee reiterates its strong support for the construction of the Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory [PNNL]. This project is funded through three separate accounts, all of which have important national missions at PNNL. Notwithstanding this unique funding arrangement, the Committee expects the Under Secretary of Science to take the lead in ensuring that the fiscal year 2010 budget requests are coordinated among all the parties, and will be sufficient to complete the project in that fiscal year. SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY The Committee provides $80,603,000 for Safeguards and Security activities, the same as the budget request. The program provides funding for physical security, information protection, and cyber security for the national laboratories and facilities of the Office of Science. SCIENCE PROGRAM DIRECTION The Committee provides $186,695,000 for the Office of Science Program Direction. The reduction from the budget request reflects the Committee's disapproval of the proposed increase in funding for headquarters and the field offices. The Committee supports the $8,916,000 for the Office of Science and Technical Information. SCIENCE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT These initiatives support the mission of the Department's Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists program. The Committee provides $13,583,000, the same as the budget request. CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED PROJECTS The Committee recommendation includes $58,500,000 for the following list of projects. CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SCIENCE PROJECTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Committee Project recommendation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Antibodies Research, University of North Dakota Research $2,750,000 Foundation, Grand Forks, ND, to research and develop antibodies for disease threats......................... Bionanotechnology: Research and Commercialization, 1,500,000 Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA, for bionanotechnology and biofuels research................ Center for Advanced Energy Studies, Idaho National 3,000,000 Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID, to conduct a pilot program to demonstrate the Nuclear Science Talent Expansion program................................................ Center for Diagnostic Nanosystems, Marshall University, 2,000,000 Huntington, WV, for disease detection and diagnosis research............................................... Center for Nanomedicine and Cellular Delivery, School of 750,000 Pharmacy, University of MD, Baltimore, MD, for research Center of Excellence and Hazardous Materials, Carlsbad, 2,000,000 NM, for applied research............................... Climate Change Modeling Capability, Los Alamos National 5,000,000 Lab, Los Alamos, NM, for climate change modeling....... Computing Capability, North Dakota State University, 5,000,000 Fargo, ND, to increase supercomputing power............ Contrast Media and Wound Closure Reduction Study, 650,000 University of Mississippi, University of Mississippi, MS, for efficiency in Iodine-based medical imaging for diagnostic procedures.................................. Facilitating blood-brain barrier research, Seattle 1,500,000 Science Foundation, Seattle, WA, for cooperative re- search................................................. Former Workers Medical Surveillance Programs, State 1,000,000 University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, for medical surveillance, needs assessment and former worker medical screenings..................................... Functional MRI Research, University of Vermont College 1,250,000 of Medicine, Burlington, VT, to support MRI research... Intermountain Center for River Restoration and 600,000 Rehabilitation, Utah State University, Logan, UT, to continue researching river restoration and environmental management............................... Marine Systems Research, University of Massachusetts at 500,000 Boston, Boston, MA, for research into aquatic ecosystems, marine biology, fisheries and mammal sustainability......................................... Materials and Energy Research Development, Tulane 1,000,000 University, New Orleans, LA, for environmental and materials research..................................... Matter-Radiation Interactions in Extremes, Los Alamos 7,000,000 National Lab, Los Alamos, NM, for advanced materials testing................................................ Mind Institute, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, 12,000,000 NM, to advance the understanding of mental illness through advanced brain imaging......................... Neuroscience research, Dominican University, River 500,000 Forest, IL, for research in to memory dysfunctions..... Pioneer Valley Life Sciences Institute Biomedical 500,000 Research, Pioneer Valley Life Science Institute, Springfield, MA, for research programs................. Regenerative medicine, Rosalind Franklin University of 500,000 Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, for regenerative medicine research......................... Research into Proton Beam Therapy, Seattle Cancer Care 1,500,000 Alliance, Seattle, WA, to research new uses for proton beam therapy........................................... Sandia Nanotechnology Engineering Center, Sandia 5,000,000 National Lab, Albuquerque, NM, for nanotechnology engineering activities................................. Supercapacitors, Sandia National Laboratories, 1,500,000 Albuquerque, NM, for work to be done in Ostego, NY on supercapacitors........................................ Sustainable Biofuels Development Center, Colorado State 1,500,000 University, Fort Collins, CO, to support research efforts in alternative energy technologies............. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nuclear Waste Disposal Appropriations, 2008.................................... $187,269,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 247,371,000 Committee recommendation................................ 195,390,000 The Committee recommendation for the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management includes $195,390,000 from fees collected by the Secretary which are deposited into the fund established by Public Law 97-425, as amended, and $193,000,000 provided from the defense appropriation for a total of $388,390,000. This total is $106,352,000 below the request. The Committee directs the Department to exercise great discretion to ensure that any work undertaken at or near Yucca Mountain is consistent with the requirements contained in section 113(c) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act and elsewhere that no repository construction shall be undertaken prior to the issuance of a repository license by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee provides $1,950,000 for the following list of projects. CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL PROJECTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Committee Project recommendation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cooperative agreement between the Department of Energy $1,600,000 and Inyo County, Inyo County, Independence, CA, to complete studies under the cooperative agreement....... Inyo County Affected Unit of Local Government, County of 350,000 Inyo, Inyo County, CA, to conduct scientific oversight responsibilities and participate in licensing activities............................................. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES GROSS APPROPRIATION Appropriations, 2008.................................... $5,459,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 19,880,000 Committee recommendation................................ 19,880,000 OFFSETTING RECEIPTS Appropriations, 2008.................................... -$1,000,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... -19,880,000 Committee recommendation................................ -19,880,000 NET APPROPRIATION Appropriations, 2008.................................... $4,459,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................................... Committee recommendation................................................ The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2008 authorized the Department to issue loan guarantees under title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 until September 30, 2009. The budget request proposes to extend authorization for $20,000,000,000 for eligible projects other than nuclear power facilities through fiscal year 2010 and $18,500,000,000 for eligible nuclear power facilities through fiscal year 2011. The Committee recommends a no-year limitation on the authorization for the entire $38,500,000,000 for all projects. Departmental Administration (GROSS) Appropriations, 2008.................................... $309,662,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 272,144,000 Committee recommendation................................ 272,144,000 (MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES) Appropriations, 2008.................................... -$161,247,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... -117,317,000 Committee recommendation................................ -117,317,000 The Committee recommends $272,144,000 for Departmental Administration, a net appropriation of $154,827,000. The Departmental Administration account funds eleven Department- wide management organizations support administrative functions such as human resources, accounting, budgeting, workforce diversity and project management activities. Office of Inspector General Appropriations, 2008.................................... $46,057,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 51,927,000 Committee recommendation................................ 51,927,000 For the Office of Inspector General, the Committee recommends $51,927,000 consistent with the budget request. The Office of Inspector General identifies opportunities for cost savings and operational efficiencies and provides the Department of Energy with the assurance that those attempting to defraud the Government are apprehended. ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES National Nuclear Security Administration WEAPONS ACTIVITIES Appropriations, 2008.................................... $6,297,466,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 6,618,079,000 Committee recommendation................................ 6,524,579,000 The Committee recommends $6,524,579,000 for National Nuclear Security Administration Weapon Activities. This is $93,500,000 below the request and $227,113,000 above current year. DIRECTED STOCKPILE WORK Life Extension Programs.--The Committee recommends $211,385,000 for the Life Extension Program, the same as the budget request. Stockpile Systems.--The Committee recommends $338,682,000 for the Stockpile Systems account, the same as the budget request. Reliable Replacement Warhead.--The Committee recommends no funds for the Reliable Replacement Warhead. Weapons Dismantlement.--The Committee recommends $205,712,000, an increase of $22,000,000 above the request and $71,037,000 over current year levels. Within the Operations and Maintenance Activities, the Committee recommends $138,822,000, an increase of $22,000,000. The Committee understands that delays with the Pit Disassembly and Conversion Facility [PDCF] has created a 4- to 6-year gap between the time when PDCF can produce feedstock and when it will be required for the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility. Within the available funds, the Committee recommends an additional $22,000,000 toward expanded operations of the AIRES line to ensure there is adequate feedstock available when the MOX facility begins operations. In addition, the Committee expects the NNSA to undertake efforts to identify ways to reduce production of by- product and waste material, lower the dose exposure to workers and achieve operational cost savings. The Committee recommends $66,890,000 as requested for the construction request 99-D-144, the Pit disassembly and conversion facility, SRS. The Committee strongly urges the Department to develop updated cost estimates from the original estimates provided in 2006. Further, the NNSA should analyze and report on whether more timely and more cost- effective alternatives to the PDCF exist within the existing NNSA complex. Stockpile Services.--The Committee recommends $888,376,000 for Stockpile Services, a decrease of $43,560,000. The Committee provides $10,000,000 for Pit Manufacturing Capability, a decrease of $43,560,000. The $10,000,000 is to be used to fund mission transfers from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to Los Alamos National Laboratory as proposed in the request. CAMPAIGNS The campaigns provide the foundation for the experimental science-based activities that support the NNSA Stockpile Stewardship mission. Research supported by the programs provide data that is used with the super computing capabilities at each of the laboratories needed to support the life extension program and to certify to the President the confidence of the nuclear deterrent. Science Campaign.--The Committee recommends $331,070,000 for the Science Campaign, an increase of $8,000,000. Within these funds, $82,413,000 is recommended for Primary Assessment Technologies, an increase of $8,000,000 to be used for to support subcritical experiments and to support fielding and diagnostics of Powder Gun, JASPER gas gun, the Borolo experiment, and the ongoing series of Phoenix experiments. The Committee recommends $28,734,000, to support the Dynamic Plutonium Experiments an increase of $5,000,000 to support additional experiments in order to understand the detailed physics of primary boost by 2015. The Committee continues to support the Advance Certification program to increase the confidence in changes to warhead design to increase the safety and reliability margins of the stockpile without underground testing. The Committee recommends $20,000,000 for Advanced Certification activities. The Committee recommends $29,418,000 for Advanced Radiography, consistent with the requested level. The Committee is pleased that work on the second beam-line at the DARHT facility is completed and it is beginning to produce extraordinary experimental hydrodynamic test data. The Committee recommends $79,292,000 for Secondary Assessment Technologies as requested. Test readiness is decreased to $5,408,000. Engineering Campaign.--The Committee recommends $162,742,000 for the Engineering Campaign, an increase of $20,000,000. The Committee believes the Engineering Campaign offers the best opportunity to explore, develop and deploy state-of-the-art use control and surety devices to our stockpile. The Committee has provided the resources to rapidly develop innovative engineering solutions to support advanced use denial as well as weapons surveillance sensors that will allow for more accurate assessment of the safety and reliability of the stockpile. The Committee recognizes there are broad applications beyond on-weapons controls and encourages the NNSA to look at other applications including securing special nuclear material and nonproliferation applications. Enhanced Surety is provided $45,641,000, an increase of $10,000,000 to support research and development of enhanced surety applications consistent with the 2007 JASON Reliable Replacement Warhead study Recommendation 2(a) to develop a ``physical understanding of enhanced surety features.'' Weapons Systems is provided $17,105,000, the same as the request. Nuclear survivability is provided $21,753,000 consistent with the request. Enhanced surveillance is provided $78,243,000, an increase of $10,000,000 to support additional research of micro devices that will improve the real time surveillance of the existing stockpile, as well as other security applications. Within the additional funds, the Committee also recommends an increase in the University Robotics program of $1,000,000 to be used to enhance the request of $2,100,000. Inertial Confinement Fusion Ignition and High Yield Campaign.--The Committee recommends $453,242,000 for the ICF campaign activities. This is an increase of $32,000,000. Ignition.--The Committee recommends $103,644,000, consistent with the budget request. NIF Diagnostics, Cryogenics and Experimental Support.--The Committee provides $68,248,000 as requested. Pulsed Power Inertial Confinement Fusion.--The Committee recommends $10,920,000, an increase of 2,000,000 to support for development of the Linear Transformer Driver concept. Joint Program in High Energy Density.--The Committee supports the budget request to fund a joint program with the Office of Science to support joint research utilizing NNSA facilities. Facility Operations and Target Production.--The Committee recommends $210,384,000, an increase of $30,000,000. Of this increase $15,000,000 is for National Ignition Facility operations and target production and an increase of $15,000,000 to support single shift operations on the Z machine and to explore advanced concepts. NIF Assembly and Installation.--$56,899,000 is provided, as requested, to support this budgeted activity. Construction.--No funding is provided for NIF construction, consistent with the request. Advanced Simulation and Computing.--The Committee is frustrated by the lack of information regarding the computing strategy for the NNSA laboratories in this budget. The budget lacks specifics regarding the acquisition priorities and budget to support new computing platforms. How computing time will be allocated and the existing computing workload divided among the labs remains unclear. The Committee requests that the NNSA provide a written report outlining its shared computing strategy to address these issues. The Committee expects this strategy to have the benefit of an independent review and be submitted to the Senate Energy and Water Development Subcommittee within 6 months after enactment. While the Office of Science supports a strategy to expand its leadership in computing capabilities and capacity, the Committee is concerned about the declining NNSA investment in computing platforms needed to sustain the computing capability at each the three national security labs. Advanced computing capabilities are critical to each of our national laboratories, enabling a wide range of programmatic activities. The Committee has recommended new climate change modeling responsibilities for the national labs, and computational modeling and simulation will play a very big role in the success of this program. It is imperative the NNSA labs have the capability to support this and other missions. The President has requested $171,000,000 for computational systems, which is $13,000,000 below current year levels. Even more troubling is the out-year funding proposed in this budget which falls to an average of $126,000,000 during years 2010 to 2014. This is nearly $60,000,000 below current year levels and is insufficient to meet our needs in the areas of national security, advanced engineering, climate change, nuclear physics and biology, all major scientific priorities for the Department of Energy and NNSA. The Committee understands that NNSA is planning to spend $42,000,000 for the Sequoia system, although this figure is not identified in the budget request. The total estimated cost of this system is $142,000,000 for the base system with an option for $35,000,000 for additional memory making it the most expensive NNSA computer acquisition to date. The Committee is concerned about the cost of this platform in light of the declining budgets for the ASC program. The Committee does not believe that the administration has requested sufficient funding to support the Sequoia acquisition as well as upgrade computing capacity at each of the labs and make the investments in future platforms necessary to sustain advanced computing capabilities at each of the three weapons labs. Prior to the release of any funding for the Sequoia system in fiscal year 2009, the Committee directs the NNSA to provide a report explaining the out year computing acquisition strategy and how, within the existing 5-year budget plan, the Department intends to fulfill the proposed capacity systems acquisition, upgrades of the Red Storm system and provide for the acquisition of future advanced computing systems. The Committee does support the budget request of $15,000,000 to develop the new Zia platform under the new memorandum of agreement between Los Alamos and Sandia National Laboratories. The Committee recommends $573,742,000 for the Advanced Simulation and Computing Campaign, an increase of $12,000,000 above the budget request. Within available funding, the Department is directed to continue to fund the Institute for Advanced Architecture and Algorithms at $7,000,000 and an additional $5,000,000 is to provide for operations of the Red Storm system to expand it uses for national security problems. The Committee supports the budget request for the Los Alamos Roadrunner Computing platform. Readiness Campaign.--The Committee recommends $158,037,000 for the Readiness Campaign, a decrease of $25,000,000. Within these funds, the Committee recommends the tritium readiness activities be funded at $71,265,000, a decrease of $11,000,000, due to unobligated balances in this account, stockpile readiness be funded at $21,731,000, a decrease of $7,000,000, and non-nuclear readiness at $33,165,000, a decrease of $7,000,000. The remaining activities are funded at the budget request level. READINESS IN TECHNICAL BASE AND FACILITIES The Committee recommends $1,703,745,000, a reduction of $21,778,000. This funding is used to support the operations and maintenance of the NNSA laboratories, productions facility, equipment purchases and personnel. Of these funds: Operations of Facilities.--The Committee recommends $1,193,907,000 for this account. This funding level reflects a reduction of $19,000,000 from the proposed $37,687,000 increase for the Kansas City Plant. Program Readiness.--The Committee recommends the requested amount of $73,841,000. Material Recycle and Recovery.--The Committee recommends the requested amount of $72,509,000. Containers.--The Committee recommends the requested amount of $23,398,000. Storage.--The Committee recommends the requested amount of $29,846,000. Construction.--The Committee recommends $310,244,000 a reduction of $2,778,000. The Committee has provided this funding increase to make key investments in laboratory infrastructure and security needs. Project 09-D-007, LANSCE Reinvestment Project [PED], Los Alamos, New Mexico.--The Committee recommends $35,000,0000, an increase of $30,000,000 to fund the refurbishment designs for this user and experimental facility. Project 09-D-404, Test Capabilities Revitalization II, Sandia, New Mexico.--The Committee recommends $3,200,000 the same as the budget request. Project 08-D-801, High Pressure Fire Loop, Pantex, Texas.-- The Committee recommends $2,000,000 the same as the request. --08-D-802, High Explosives Pressing Facility, Pantex, Texas.-- The Committee recommends $28,233,000 the same as the request. --08-D-804, TA-55 Reinvestment Project, Los Alamos, New Mexico.--The Committee recommends $7,900,000 the same as the request. --08-D-804 Ion Beam Laboratory Refurbishment, SNL, Albuquerque, New Mexico.--The Committee recommends $10,014,000 the same as the request. --07-D-140 Project Engineering and Design, Various Locations.--The Committee recommends $7,446,000 the same as the request. --07-D-220 Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility Upgrade Project, LANL, New Mexico.--The Committee recommends $19,660,000 the same as the request. --06-D-140 Project Engineering and Design, Various Locations.--The Committee recommends $47,083,000 for these projects. Of the amount provided, $8,500,000 is for the TA-55 reinvestment project. For the design of the Uranium Processing Facility $38,583,000 is provided, the same amount as current year funding and a decrease of $57,578,000 below the request. The Committee does not believe the Department has provided adequate justification to support the Uranium Processing Facility at Y-12 and has reprogrammed funding from this activity to other higher priorities in the past. The Committee notes the Cost Analysis Improvement Group has identified potential long-term cost-savings by constructing the UPF facility at another existing NNSA complex site. The Committee is concerned the NNSA is not giving this issue vigorous consideration. --06-D-420 NTS Replace Fire Stations 1 & 2, Nevada Test Site, Nevada.--The Committee recommends $9,340,000, the same as the request. --05-D-402, Beryllium Capability Project, Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.--The Committee recommends $5,015,000, the same as the request. --04-D-125, Chemistry and Metallurgy Facility Replacement Project, Los Alamos, New Mexico.--The Committee recommends $125,000,000 for this project, an increase of $24,800,000. The recommendation provides additional funding to make up for funding shortfalls in previous This facility allows for the consolidation of the NNSA's plutonium analytical chemistry and actinide research activities and replaces the exiting facility which sits atop an active seismic fault. The Committee is sensitive to the fact that the rising cost of materials such as concrete and steel has increased project cost estimates by over 30 percent for this project. The Committee is also aware of the fact that changes in the seismic requirements have required significant design changes that include 4 foot thick walls and doubling the thickness of the concrete slab to 10 feet. --04-D-128, TA-18 Mission Relocation Project, Los Alamos, New Mexico.--The Committee recommends $10,353,000, the same as the request. SECURE TRANSPORTATION ASSET The Committee recommendation for the Secure Transportation Asset program is $221,072,000 as requested. This organization provides an invaluable service is responsible for the safe and secure transport of our nuclear weapons, weapons components and special nuclear material. NUCLEAR WEAPONS INCIDENT RESPONSE The Committee recommends full funding for the nuclear weapons incident response program. The committee provides $221,936,000 as requested. FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE RECAPITALIZATION The Committee provides $163,549,000 for Facilities and Infrastructure Recapitalization activities, a decrease of $6,000,000 in operations and maintenance. This program was developed to reduce the backlog in deferred maintenance of aging infrastructure facilities throughout the complex. The old facilities continue to be a drain on resources and should be demolished or disposed of as quickly as possible. ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS AND OPERATIONS The Committee recommends $28,316,000 for environmental projects and operations, a decrease of $12,271,000. TRANSFORMATION DISPOSITION The Committee does not provide any of the $77,391,000 requested to initiate the transformation disposition program. The Committee agrees with the goals of the new program, but notes with significant frustration that while the Department of Energy and Office of Management and Budget managed to find $77,391,000 for decommissioning and demolition of these non- contaminated buildings under the NNSA's control, the two agencies at the same time proposed hundreds of millions in cuts to ongoing D&D work of radiological contaminated buildings under the control of the Office of Environmental Management [EM]. The EM controlled buildings are contaminated and present a threat to human health and the environment. The administration argues these NNSA transformation disposition funds will lead to cost savings by decreasing hotel costs. However, the same logic applies to the EM program. On balance, the Committee does not see the logic in DOE and OMB's priorities between these two programs D&D activities. SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY The Committee recommendation for the Safeguards and Security program is $859,839,000 as requested. Defense Nuclear Security.--The Committee recommends $690,217,000 as requested. Construction.--The Committee recommends $47,111,000 as requested to support the following projects: --08-D-701 Nuclear Materials S&S Upgrade Project Los Alamos National Laboratory.--The Committee provides $46,000,000 as requested. --05-D-170 Project Engineering and Design, Various Locations.--The Committee recommends $1,111,000 as requested. Cyber Security.--The Committee provides $122,511,000 as requested. CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED PROJECTS The Committee recommends $3,500,000 for the following list of projects. CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED WEAPONS ACTIVITIES PROJECTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Committee Project recommendation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University, Las $1,000,000 Cruces, NM, to promote prosperity in New Mexico through economic development................................... Electronic Record for Worker Safety and Health, 1,500,000 University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Clark County to help the Nevada Site Office improve responses to DOE worker claims................................................. Renewable Energy Planning, National Nuclear Security 500,000 Administration, Nevada Test Site, NV, for planning to maximize renewable energy production at the Site....... Restore Manhattan Project Sites, Los Alamos National 500,000 Lab, Los Alamos, NM, for historic preservation......... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Appropriations, 2008.................................... \1\$1,657,996 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 1,247,966 Committee recommendation................................ 1,909,056 \1\Includes $322,000,000 in reallocated prior year balances. The Committee recommends $1,909,056,000, an increase of $175,000,000 above the request and $251,060,000 above current year levels. The Committee has restored funding for the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility as it continues to serve a significant nonproliferation objective. The Committee recommends a significant upgrade in the Nation's technical capability to deal with proliferation threats by focusing greater investment in laboratory capabilities and improving the capabilities available to IAEA inspectors. Significant funding has also been provided to accelerate efforts to repatriate nuclear material from around the world and provide for its secure storage or elimination. The Committee has provided $15,000,000 to Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation to support its participation in an Integrated University Program. The Committee recommends $10,000,000 of this amount to be used to support university programs in technical areas vital to the nonproliferation mission, including nuclear forensics and international nuclear safeguards. In addition, not less than $5,000,000 of this amount will be used for grants to support research projects that do not align with programmatic missions but are critical to maintaining the discipline of nuclear science and engineering. NONPROLIFERATION AND VERIFACTION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Committee recommends $350,091,000, an increase of $75,000,000 above the request. The additional funds will be provided to increase our capabilities in proliferation detection. Of this amount, $30,000,000 is provided to support sustained, multi-year funding for detection research, including investments in simulation and data analysis capabilities relevant to the nonproliferation and international safeguards missions. NNSA should take advantage of the significant investments in advanced computing and algorithm development at the national laboratories for its nonproliferation programs. The Committee remains concerned that despite Congressional direction, additional funds have been used to reinforce existing efforts rather than to increase the Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation's role in investing in core capabilities and infrastructure. Within the available increase, the Committee recommends $20,000,000 for a more effective nuclear forensic and attribution capability. A recent American Association for the Advancement of Science report concludes that our technical ability to provide decision makers with critical analyses in a timely manner needs improvement. Both our pre-detonation and post-detonation evaluation capabilities must be strengthened. We also have critical shortages in personnel with key skills such as radiochemistry. Within the additional funds, $10,000,000 is provided for nuclear explosion monitoring directed at expanding nuclear explosion monitoring for very low yield nuclear testing around the world. The Committee directs the Department to utilize not less than an additional $5,000,000 to competitively fund an integrated suite of research, technology development and demonstration projects including infrasound, hydroacoustic, and seismic technologies for nuclear explosion monitoring. An additional $10,000,000 is provided to support the Integrated University Program. The Committee recommendation includes the request of $13,147,000 to continue construction of the Physical Sciences Laboratory at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. NONPROLIFERATION AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY The Committee recommends $175,467,000, an increase of $35,000,000 above the request and $25,474,000 above current year levels. Within the additional funds $20,000,000 is available to support the Next Generation Safeguards Initiative; $10,000,000 to be available to support disablement and material removal efforts in North Korea or other emerging threats, and $5,000,000 to support the Integrated University Program. INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS PROTECTION AND COOPERATION The Committee recommends $429,694,000 consistent with the request. The Committee has provided this office with significant funding increases in the past and supports the mission of this office. ELIMINATION OF WEAPONS-GRADE PLUTONIUM PRODUCTION The Committee recommends $141,299,000 consistent with the request. FISSILE MATERIALS DISPOSITION The Committee recommends $528,782,000, consistent with the budget request. The Committee believes the nonproliferation mission remains the overall objective of this project and has restored the funding to Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation. U.S. Surplus Fissile Materials Disposition.--The Committee recommends $40,774,000 consistent with the budget request. Consistent with the budget request, the Committee has included $39,274,000 for the research reactor fuel project and the reliable fuel supply project. By September 2009, the Department expects to have completed the downblending of nearly all of the 17.4 metric tons of HEU for the reliable fuel supply program. The Committee expects the Department to provide a written report by the end of the fiscal year to update the Committee on how the Department intends to utilize the reliable fuel supply and under what terms and conditions this material will be made available to other nations. Further, the Committee encourages the Department to consider possible domestic needs as well consistent with the fiscal year 2008 conference report. Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility.--The Committee recommends $19,200,000 to support operations and maintenance including the development of the feedstock and testing of fuel assemblies as requested and $467,808,000 for construction and other project costs, consistent with the budget request. The Committee understands that the deep cuts to the program in fiscal year 2008 will increase the total cost and result in delay in the completion of this project but encourages the NNSA do its best to safely accelerate completion of this project. GLOBAL THREAT REDUCTION INITIATIVE The Committee recommends $284,641,000, an increase of $65,000,000 above the request and $86,416,000 above current year levels. Of the additional funding $20,000,000 is provided to support the development of high density fuels to replace HEU cores; and an additional $45,000,000 is provided to accelerate the removal of proliferation sensitive materials from around the world. The NNSA has recovered more than 16,000 radiological sources in an effort to reduce the threat of attacks involving radiological dispersion devices. While the recovered sources are no longer needed by their previous owners, some may still find useful application and could be used to reduce the demand for new source material. We should look to maximize the recycling of such material and minimize the need for foreign imports. Using available funds a report should be produced on the benefits and costs of establishing a process for the reuse of recovered radiological sources for industrial or other legitimate purposes. Naval Reactors Appropriations, 2008.................................... $774,686,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 828,054,000 Committee recommendation................................ 828,054,000 Through the Naval Reactors program, the National Nuclear Security Administration is working to provide the U.S. Navy with nuclear propulsion plants that are capable of responding to the challenges of 21st century security concerns. The Committee recommends $828,054,000 for the Naval Reactors program. Office of the Administrator Appropriations, 2008.................................... $402,137,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 404,081,000 Committee recommendation................................ 404,081,000 The Committee recommends $404,081,000 for the Office of the Administrator, the same as the President's request. ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES Defense Environmental Cleanup Appropriations, 2008.................................... $5,349,325,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 5,297,256,000 Committee recommendation................................ 5,771,506,000 The Committee recommendation for Defense Environmental Cleanup is $5,771,506,000, an increase of $474,250,000 above the President's request. The Committee is disappointed with the administration's fiscal year 2009 budget proposal, which is $167,000,000 less than the veto-threat constrained fiscal year 2008 appropriation. The fiscal year 2009 program is underfunded to the point even this administration has admitted that, for the first time in its 20-year history, the cleanup budget request is insufficient to meet its existing regulatory compliance milestones. In testimony presented to the Committee this past April, the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management admitted this budget was as much as $900,000,000 short of supporting regulatory compliance milestones. The result is a budget request that, if unchanged, would result immediately in non-compliance with regulatory agreements and layoffs around the cleanup complex. Thus, our Committee has had to significantly increase, to the tune of $554,250,000, our recommendation for the entire Environmental Cleanup program in the hope of avoiding many of those consequences. We warn the Department not to rely on the Congress to solve its legal obligations in the future, and we expect a budget submittal that is legally compliant in fiscal year 2010. Reprogramming Control Levels.--In fiscal year 2009, the Environmental Management program may transfer funding between projects within the controls listed below using guidance contained in the Department's budget execution manual (DOE M 135.1-1A, Chapter IV). If the amount of a single transfer, or the cumulative amount of multiple transfers, between projects within the control level exceeds 25 percent of the fiscal year 2009 appropriated level, the Environmental Management program must notify both the House and Senate Appropriations Committees within 30 days after the transfer. The Committee recommends the following reprogramming control points for fiscal year 2009: --Closure sites; --Savannah River site, 2012 completion projects; --Savannah River site, 2035 completion projects; --Savannah River site, tank farm operations projects; --Waste Isolation Pilot Plant; --Idaho National Laboratory; --Oak Ridge Reservation; --Hanford site; 2012 completion projects; --Hanford site; 2035 completion projects; --Office of River Protection, tank farm operations projects; --Office of River Protection, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant; --Program Direction; --Program Support; --Technology Development and Deployment; --All construction line items; --NNSA sites; and --Safeguards and Security. Internal Reprogramming Authority.--Since only a few of the sites above have multiple control points to which the internal reprogramming statute applies, Environmental Management site managers may transfer up to $5,000,000, one time, between accounts listed below to reduce health and safety risks, gain cost savings, or complete projects, as long as a program or project is not increased or decreased by more than $5,000,000 in total during the fiscal year. This reprogramming authority may not be used to initiate new programs or to change funding levels for programs specifically denied, limited, or increased by Congress in the act or report. The Committee on Appropriations in the House of Representatives and the Senate must be notified within 30 days after the use of this internal reprogramming authority. The following is a list of account control points for internal reprogramming purposes: --Savannah River site, 2012 completion projects; --Savannah River site, 2035 completion projects; --Savannah River site, tank farm operations projects; --Hanford site; 2012 completion projects; --Hanford site; 2035 completion projects; and --Transfers between construction line item(s) and the operating budget within the same site, as applicable. Closure Sites.--The Committee includes $59,383,000, an increase of $13,500,000 above the request, to assure disposal of the Fernald Byproducts Waste. Hanford Site.--The Committee includes $1,020,564,000, a total of $168,777,000 above the budget request. Of the increase, $80,577,000 is directed to the River Corridor Closure Project; $9,000,000 is directed to the stabilization and disposition of special nuclear material at the Plutonium Finishing Plant; $45,000,000 is provided for solid waste operations in the 200 Area; and $25,700,000 is for remediation of the groundwater and vadose zone. The Committee notes the Department's continued support for the B-Reactor Museum and the Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response [HAMMER] facility, which are provided for within available funds at the site. Idaho Cleanup Project.--The Committee recommends $465,124,000, which is $33,000,000 over the request. From within available funds, $2,000,000 is provided to continue the national spent fuel program. An increase of $18,000,000 is provided for increased buried transuranic waste retrieval, characterization, and shipping, as required by State agreement. Another $8,000,000 is provided to avoid interrupting currently mobilized decontamination and decommissioning teams which are reducing Environmental Management's site footprint and cost of operation. Finally, $7,000,000 is provided for the exchange of spent nuclear fuel with the Savannah River Site, South Carolina. NNSA Sites.--The Committee recommendation is $346,084,000, a total of $101,000,000 above the request. The Committee recommends $245,467,000 for cleanup at Los Alamos National Laboratory, $83,000,000 above the request. The increase is necessary to prevent the site from missing agreed upon cleanup milestones in fiscal year 2009. The Committee also provides $75,674,000 for Nevada, $10,000,000 above the request, for characterization and certification of remaining transuranic waste stored at Nevada for disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant; $3,000,000 for the Sandia National Laboratory, $3,000,000 above the request, for Landfill Remediation activities per the regulatory closure requirement; and $5,000,000 above the request for continuing decontamination and decommissioning at the Separations Processing Research Unit. Oak Ridge Reservation.--The recommendation is $255,000,000, an increase of $17,330,000 above the budget request, $13,330,000 of which will continue decontamination and decommissioning of facilities ``owned'' by Environmental Management at the Y-12 and Oak Ridge National Laboratory complexes. The remaining $4,000,000 will be used for TSCA Operations through fiscal year 2009 to support Paducah and Portsmouth cleanup efforts. Office of River Protection.--The Committee provides $1,031,443,000, an increase of $53,000,000 above the request. The entire increase is for supplemental treatment activities and single shell tank retrievals in the tank farms. The Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant is fully supported at $690,000,000. Savannah River Site.--The Committee includes $1,264,961,000, an increase of $58,536,000 above the budget request. The additional funding will complete Transuranic waste drum shipments to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant; provide for groundwater cleanup (+$11,692,000) and decontamination and decommissioning (+$35,344,000), for packaging special nuclear materials (+$8,000,000) for long term storage; and preparing spent nuclear fuel for exchange with Idaho ($3,500,000). Waste Isolation Pilot Plant [WIPP].--The recommendation is $231,661,000 for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. The increase of $20,137,000 maintains the fiscal year 2008 level of transuranic waste shipments and receipts at this site. Program Direction.--The Committee includes $308,765,000, the same as the requested amount. Program Support.--The Committee includes $33,930,000, the same as the request. Safeguards and Security.--The Committee recommends $260,341,000. The $9,000,000 increase is for security upgrades at the Canister Storage Building in Hanford, Washington, for special nuclear material that will not be shipped offsite to South Carolina. Technology Development and Deployment.--The Committee provides $22,250,000. Federal Contribution to Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund.--The recommendation is $463,000,000, the same as the request. Uncosted Offset.--The Committee does not accept the proposal to reduce this request by using $1,109,000 of prior year uncosted balances. Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee includes $9,000,000 for the following list of projects. CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Committee Project recommendation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Characteristics and Clean-up of U.S. Nuclear Legacy, $4,000,000 Institute for Clean Energy Technology, Mississippi State, MS, for renewal of the cooperative agreement with the DOE to help expedite the cleanup of the nuclear defense sites.................................. Water Resources Data, Modeling, and Visualization 1,000,000 Center, Desert Research Institute, Washoe County, NV for water research..................................... WIPP Records Archive, WIPP, Carlsbad, NM, for records 4,000,000 archiving.............................................. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Other Defense Activities Appropriations, 2008.................................... $754,359,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 1,335,996,000 Committee recommendation................................ 827,503,000 The Committee recommendation is $827,503,000, for Other Defense Activities, the same as requested, with the exception of the MOX construction project, which is funded under the Nuclear Nonproliferation program. This amount is sufficient to provide for the Office of Health, Safety and Security ($447,918,000), the Office of Legacy Management ($185,981,000), Safeguards and Security for Nuclear Energy's Idaho Site ($78,811,000), Defense Related Administrative Support, which contributes its share toward the Department's administrative costs ($108,190,000), and the Office of Hearings and Appeals ($6,603,000). The Committee concurs with the budgetary change proposed by the Office of Legacy Management to consolidate its mission funding under a single appropriation. This consolidation leads to efficiencies in managing the approximately 80 former research and production sites, and administering the pension and benefit plans for retired cold war employees. The Committee also concurs with the change in policy for Nuclear Energy's Safeguards and Security Reimbursable Work, which again can lead to efficiencies in managing and executing the program. Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committed recommends $1,050,000 for the following list of projects. CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES PROJECTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Committee Project recommendation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Medical Monitoring at Paducah, KY, Portsmouth, OH, and $1,050,000 Oak Ridge, TN, Paducah, Portsmouth, and Oak Ridge Medical Monitoring, Paducah, KY, Portsmouth, OH, and Oak Ridge, TN, to provide for continued conventional medical work-ups and lung scans and re-scans for current and former workers............................. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Appropriations, 2008.................................... $199,171,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 247,371,000 Committee recommendation................................ 193,000,000 The Committee recommendation for Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal under the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management is $193,000,000. Along with $195,390,000 from fees collected by the Secretary which are deposited into the fund established by Public Law 97-425, as amended, the Committee provides a total of $388,390,000 for fiscal year 2009. Power Marketing Administrations BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION The Bonneville Power Administration is the Department of Energy's marketing agency for electric power in the Pacific Northwest. Bonneville provides electricity to a 300,000 square mile service area in the Columbia River drainage basin. Bonneville markets the power from Federal hydropower projects in the Northwest, as well as power from non-Federal generating facilities in the region. Bonneville also exchanges and markets surplus power with Canada and California. The Committee recommends no new borrowing authority for BPA during fiscal year 2009. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION Appropriations, 2008.................................... $6,404,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 7,420,000 Committee recommendation................................ 7,420,000 For the Southeastern Power Administration, the Committee recommends $7,420,000, the same as the budget request. The Committee provides $63,522,000 for purchase power and wheeling. The Southeastern Power Administration markets hydroelectric power produced at Corps of Engineers projects in 11 Southeastern States. Southeastern does not own or operate any transmission facilities and carries out its marketing program by utilizing the existing transmission systems of the power utilities in the area. This is accomplished through transmission arrangements between Southeastern and each of the area utilities with transmission lines connected to the projects. The utility agrees to deliver specified amounts of Federal power to customers of the Government, and Southeastern agrees to compensate the utility for the wheeling service performed. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION Appropriations, 2008.................................... $30,165,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 28,414,000 Committee recommendation................................ 28,414,000 For the Southwestern Power Administration, the Committee recommends $28,414,000, the same as the budget request. The Committee provides $46,000,000 for purchase power and wheeling. The Southwestern Power Administration is the marketing agent for the power generated at the Corps of Engineers' hydroelectric plants in the six State area of Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Missouri, Arkansas, and Louisiana, with a total installed capacity of 2,158 megawatts. It operates and maintains some 1,380 miles of transmission lines, 24 generating projects, and 24 substations, and sells its power at wholesale, primarily to publicly and cooperatively-owned electric distribution utilities. CONSTRUCTION, REHABILITATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION Appropriations, 2008.................................... $228,907,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 193,346,000 Committee recommendation................................ 218,346,000 The Western Power Administration is responsible for marketing the electric power generated by the Bureau of Reclamation, the Corps of Engineers, and the International Boundary and Water Commission. Western also operates and maintains a system of transmission lines nearly 17,000 miles long, providing electricity to 15 Central and Western States over a service area of 1.3 million square miles. The Committee notes that Western Area Power Administration funding for Construction, Rehabilitation, Operations and Maintenance is significantly reduced from prior levels. The budget proposes to offset this reduction by a far greater reliance on use of alternative financing. While direct customer financing is well established there are limits on the availability of this alternative financing mechanism. The Committee is concerned that continued reductions in Western's construction program could impair the reliability of the transmission systems. The Committee recommends $218,346,000 for the Western Area Power Administration. The total program level for Western in fiscal year 2009 is $901,634,000, which includes $74,544,000 for construction and rehabilitation, $52,365,000 for system power operation and maintenance, $600,960,000 for purchase power and wheeling, and $166,423,000 for program direction. The Committee recommendation includes $7,342,000 for the Utah Mitigation and Conservation Fund. Offsetting collections total $406,484,000; with the use of $3,366,000 of offsetting collections from the Colorado River Dam Fund (as authorized in Public Law 98-381), this requires a net appropriation of $218,346,000. An increase in purchase power and wheeling use of receipt authority of $75,000,000, over and above the request of $328,100,000, is needed to provide for increases in cost of power, continuing drought conditions, and for certain unforeseen charges. FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND Appropriations, 2008.................................... $2,477,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 2,959,000 Committee recommendation................................ 2,959,000 The Falcon Dam and Amistad Dam on the Rio Grande River generate power through hydroelectric facilities and sell this power to public utilities through the Western Power Administration. This fund, created in the Foreign Relations Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995, defrays the costs of operation, maintenance, and emergency activities and is administered by the Western Area Power Administration. For the Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund, the Committee recommends $2,959,000 the same as the request. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission SALARIES AND EXPENSES Appropriations, 2008.................................... $260,425,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 273,400,000 Committee recommendation................................ 273,400,000 REVENUES APPLIED Appropriations, 2008.................................... -$260,425,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... -273,400,000 Committee recommendation................................ -273,400,000 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY [In thousands of dollars] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Committee recommendation Committee compared to-- Revised enacted Budget estimate recommendation --------------------------------- Revised enacted Budget estimate -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy RDD&D: Local Government and Tribal technology demonstration........... ............... ............... 50,000 +50,000 +50,000 Hydrogen Technology........................................ 211,062 146,213 175,000 -36,062 +28,787 Biomass and Biorefinery Systems R&D........................ 198,180 225,000 235,000 +36,820 +10,000 Solar energy............................................... 168,453 156,120 229,000 +60,547 +72,880 Wind energy................................................ 49,545 52,500 62,500 +12,955 +10,000 Geothermal technology...................................... 19,818 30,000 30,000 +10,182 ............... Water Power Energy......................................... 9,909 3,000 30,000 +20,091 +27,000 Vehicle technologies....................................... 213,043 221,086 293,000 +79,957 +71,914 Building technologies...................................... 108,999 123,765 176,481 +67,482 +52,716 Industrial technologies.................................... 64,408 62,119 65,119 +711 +3,000 Federal energy management program.......................... 19,818 22,000 22,000 +2,182 ............... Facilities and infrastructure: National Renewable Energy Laboratory [NREL]............ 6,918 9,982 21,982 +15,064 +12,000 NREL Solar equipment recapitalization.................. 7,927 ............... ............... -7,927 ............... Construction: 08-EE-02 South-table mountain site infrastructure 6,831 ............... 7,000 +169 +7,000 development, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Co........................................ 08-EE-01 Energy systems integration facility, 54,500 4,000 8,000 -46,500 +4,000 National Renewal Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Construction......................... 61,331 4,000 15,000 -46,331 +11,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Facilities and infrastructure........ 76,176 13,982 36,982 -39,194 +23,000 Program direction.......................................... 104,057 121,846 121,846 +17,789 ............... Program support............................................ 10,801 20,000 15,000 +4,199 -5,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy RDD&D... 1,254,269 1,197,631 1,541,928 +287,659 +344,297 Federal energy assistance: Weatherization assistance...................................... 222,713 ............... 200,000 -22,713 +200,000 Training and technical assistance.............................. 4,509 ............... 1,181 -3,328 +1,181 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Weatherization..................................... 227,222 ............... 201,181 -26,041 +201,181 Other: State energy program....................................... 44,095 50,000 50,000 +5,905 ............... International renewable energy program..................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... Tribal energy activities................................... 5,945 1,000 6,000 +55 +5,000 Renewable energy production incentive...................... 4,955 ............... 5,000 +45 +5,000 Asia pacific............................................... ............... 7,500 ............... ............... -7,500 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Other.......................................... 54,995 58,500 61,000 +6,005 +2,500 Subtotal, Federal energy assistance...................... 282,217 58,500 262,181 -20,036 +203,681 Use of prior year balances......................................... ............... -738 ............... ............... +738 Congressionally directed projects.................................. 185,921 ............... 124,150 -61,771 +124,150 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL, ENERGY EFFICENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY................. 1,722,407 1,255,393 1,928,259 +205,852 +672,866 ==================================================================================== ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY Research and development: High temperature superconductivity R&D......................... 27,930 28,186 28,186 +256 ............... Visualization and controls................................. 25,075 25,305 35,305 +10,230 +10,000 Energy storage and power electronics....................... 6,741 13,403 17,403 +10,662 +4,000 Renewable and distributed systems integration.............. 25,466 33,306 39,306 +13,840 +6,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Research and development....................... 85,212 100,200 120,200 +34,988 +20,000 Operations and analysis............................................ 11,451 14,122 14,122 +2,671 ............... Program direction.................................................. 17,603 19,678 19,678 +2,075 ............... Congressionally directed projects.............................. 24,290 ............... 12,900 -11,390 +12,900 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL, ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY........... 138,556 134,000 166,900 +28,344 +32,900 ==================================================================================== NUCLEAR ENERGY Research and development: Integrated University program.................................. ............... ............... 15,000 +15,000 +15,000 Nuclear power 2010............................................. 133,771 241,600 241,600 +107,829 ............... Generation IV nuclear energy systems initiative................ 114,917 70,000 70,000 -44,917 ............... Nuclear hydrogen initiative.................................... 9,909 16,600 10,000 +91 -6,600 Advanced fuel cycle initiative................................. 179,353 301,500 229,700 +50,347 -71,800 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Research and development........................... 437,950 629,700 566,300 +128,350 -63,400 Infrastructure: Radiological facilities management: Space and defense infrastructure........................... 30,371 35,000 35,000 +4,629 ............... Medical isotopes infrastructure............................ 14,828 ............... ............... -14,828 ............... Research reactor infrastructure............................ 2,920 3,700 6,000 +3,080 +2,300 Oak Ridge nuclear infrastructure........................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Radiological facilities management............. 48,119 38,700 41,000 -7,119 +2,300 INL infrastructure: INL Operations and infrastructure.......................... 115,935 104,700 119,700 +3,765 +15,000 Idaho sitewide safeguards and security..................... 75,261 78,811 78,811 +3,550 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, INL Infrastructure............................. 239,315 222,211 239,511 +196 +17,300 Program direction.................................................. 80,872 80,544 73,000 -7,872 -7,544 Use of prior year balances......................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Nuclear Energy..................................... 758,137 932,455 878,811 +120,674 -53,644 ==================================================================================== Funding from other defense activities.............................. -75,261 -78,811 -78,811 -3,550 ............... Congressional directed projects.................................... ............... ............... 3,000 +3,000 +3,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL, NUCLEAR ENERGY........................................ 682,876 853,644 803,000 +120,124 -50,644 ==================================================================================== OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT Legacy management.................................................. 33,872 ............... ............... -33,872 ............... CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY Deferral of unobligated balances, fiscal year 2008................. 257,000 ............... ............... -257,000 ............... Deferral of unobligated balances, fiscal year 2009................. -149,000 149,000 149,000 +298,000 ............... Transfer to Fossil Energy R&D [CCPI]............................... -69,363 ............... ............... +69,363 ............... Transfer to Fossil Energy R&D [CCDI]............................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... Transfer to Fossil Energy R&D...................................... -74,317 -149,000 -149,000 -74,683 ............... Transfer to Fossil Energy R&D (Fuels & Power Systems).............. -20,809 ............... ............... +20,809 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL, CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY................................. -56,489 ............... ............... +56,489 ............... ==================================================================================== FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Clean coal power initiative........................................ 69,363 85,000 232,300 +162,937 +147,300 FutureGen.......................................................... 74,317 156,000 ............... -74,317 -156,000 Fuels and Power Systems: Innovations for existing plants................................ 36,081 40,000 50,000 +13,919 +10,000 Advanced integrated gasification combined cycle................ 53,509 69,000 63,000 +9,491 -6,000 Advanced turbines.............................................. 23,782 28,000 30,000 +6,218 +2,000 Carbon sequestration........................................... 118,908 149,132 149,132 +30,224 ............... Fuels.......................................................... 24,773 10,000 30,000 +5,227 +20,000 Fuel cells..................................................... 55,490 60,000 60,000 +4,510 ............... Advanced research.............................................. 37,159 26,600 30,000 -7,159 +3,400 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Fuels and power systems............................ 349,702 382,732 412,132 +62,430 +29,400 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Coal............................................... 493,382 623,732 644,432 +151,050 +20,700 Natural Gas Technologies........................................... 19,818 ............... 20,000 +182 +20,000 Petroleum--Oil Technologies........................................ 4,954 ............... 5,000 +46 +5,000 Program direction.................................................. 148,597 126,252 152,804 +4,207 +26,552 Plant and Capital Equipment........................................ 12,882 5,000 17,748 +4,866 +12,748 Fossil energy environmental restoration............................ 9,483 9,700 9,700 +217 ............... Special recruitment programs....................................... 650 656 656 +6 ............... Cooperative research and development............................... 4,954 ............... 5,000 +46 +5,000 Congressionally directed projects.................................. 48,118 ............... 32,700 -15,418 +32,700 Use of prior year balances......................................... ............... -11,310 -11,310 -11,310 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL, FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT................ 742,838 754,030 876,730 +133,892 +122,700 ==================================================================================== NAVAL PETROLEUM AND OIL SHALE RESERVES............................. 20,272 19,099 19,099 -1,173 ............... STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE........................................ 186,757 346,923 205,000 +18,243 -141,923 Use of prior year balances......................................... ............... -2,923 ............... ............... +2,923 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL, STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE........................... 186,757 344,000 205,000 +18,243 -139,000 NORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVE................................. 12,335 9,800 9,800 -2,535 ............... ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION.................................. 95,460 110,595 110,595 +15,135 ............... NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP West Valley Demonstration Project.................................. 53,900 57,600 72,900 +19,000 +15,300 Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility (WA)............................... 10,248 10,755 10,755 +507 ............... Gaseous Diffusion Plants........................................... 37,773 81,296 92,696 +54,923 +11,400 Small Sites........................................................ ............... 64,413 90,060 +90,060 +25,647 Use of Prior year balances......................................... ............... -653 ............... ............... +653 Congressionally directed projects.................................. ............... ............... 3,000 +3,000 +3,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL, NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP..................... 101,921 213,411 269,411 +167,490 +56,000 ==================================================================================== URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING FUND Decontamination and decommissioning................................ 602,344 480,333 515,333 -87,011 +35,000 Uranium/thorium reimbursement...................................... 19,818 ............... ............... -19,818 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL, UED&D FUND/URANIUM INVENTORY CLEANUP.................. 622,162 480,333 515,333 -106,829 +35,000 ==================================================================================== SCIENCE High energy physics: Proton accelerator-based physics............................... 373,274 419,577 419,577 +46,303 ............... Electron accelerator-based physics............................. 78,046 48,772 48,772 -29,274 ............... Non-accelerator physics........................................ 61,238 86,482 86,482 +25,244 ............... Theoretical physics............................................ 56,391 63,036 63,036 +6,645 ............... Advanced technology R&D........................................ 119,368 187,093 187,093 +67,725 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, High energy physics................................... 688,317 804,960 804,960 +116,643 ............... Nuclear physics.................................................... 415,187 479,019 479,019 +63,832 ............... Construction: 07-SC-02 Electron beam ion source Brookhaven National 4,162 2,438 2,438 -1,724 ............... Laboratory, NY............................................ 06-SC-01 Project engineering and design [PED] 12 GeV 13,377 28,623 28,623 +15,246 ............... continuous electron beam accelerator facility upgrade, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator facility (was project 07-SC-001), Newport News, VA...................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Nuclear physics................................. 432,726 510,080 510,080 +77,354 ............... Biological and environmental research: Biological research............................................ 407,530 413,613 423,613 +16,083 +10,000 Climate change research........................................ 136,867 154,927 174,927 +38,060 +20,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Biological and environmental research................. 544,397 568,540 598,540 +54,143 +30,000 Basic energy sciences: Research: Materials sciences and engineering research................ 946,403 1,125,579 1,038,839 +92,436 -86,740 Chemical sciences, geosciences, and energy biosciences..... 230,234 297,113 231,071 +837 -66,042 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Research....................................... 1,176,637 1,422,692 1,269,910 +93,273 -152,782 Construction: 08-SC-01 Advanced light source [ALS] user support building, 4,954 11,500 11,500 +6,546 ............... LBNL, CA.................................................. 08-SC-10 Project engineering and design [PED] Photon 941 ............... ............... -941 ............... ultrafast laser science and engineering [PULSE] building renovation, SLAC, CA...................................... 08-SC-11 Photon ultrafast laser science and engineering 6,391 3,728 3,728 -2,663 ............... [PULSE] building renovation, SLAC, CA..................... 07-SC-06 Project engineering and design [PED] National 29,727 93,273 93,273 +63,546 ............... Synchrotron light source II [NSLS-II]..................... 05-R-320 LINAC coherent light source [LCLS]................ 50,889 36,967 36,967 -13,922 ............... 705-R-321 Center for functional nanomaterials [BNL]........ 363 ............... ............... -363 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Construction................................... 93,265 145,468 145,468 +52,203 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Basic energy sciences............................. 1,269,902 1,568,160 1,415,378 +145,476 -152,782 Advanced scientific computing research............................. 351,173 368,820 368,820 +17,647 ............... Fusion energy sciences program..................................... 286,548 493,050 493,050 +206,502 ............... Science laboratories infrastructure: Laboratories facilities support: Infrastructure support: Payment in lieu of taxes............................... 1,506 1,385 1,385 -121 ............... Excess facilities disposal............................. 8,748 14,844 14,844 +6,096 ............... Oak Ridge landlord..................................... 5,033 5,079 5,079 +46 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Infrastructure support..................... 15,287 21,308 21,308 +6,021 ............... Construction: 09-SC-72 Seismic life-safety, modernization and ............... 12,495 12,495 +12,495 ............... replacement of general purpose buildings Phase 2, PED/ Construction, LBNL.................................... 09-SC-73, Interdisciplinary science building Phase 1, ............... 8,240 8,240 +8,240 ............... PED, BNL.............................................. 09-SC-74, Technology and engineering development ............... 3,700 3,700 +3,700 ............... facilities PED, TJNAF................................. 08-SC-71 Modernization of laboratory facilities PED, ............... 14,103 14,103 +14,103 ............... ORNL.................................................. 07-SC-05 Physical science facilities, PNNL............. ............... 41,155 41,155 +41,155 ............... 03-SC-001 Science laboratories infrastructure MEL-001 49,574 9,259 9,259 -40,315 ............... Multiprogram energy laboratory infrastructure projects, various locations........................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Construction............................. 49,574 88,952 88,952 +39,378 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Science laboratories infrastructure......... 64,861 110,260 110,260 +45,399 ............... Safeguards and security............................................ 75,946 80,603 80,603 +4,657 ............... Science program direction: Headquarters................................................... 75,525 82,846 75,525 ............... -7,321 Office of Science and Technical Information.................... ............... 8,916 8,916 +8,916 ............... Field offices.................................................. 102,254 112,151 102,254 ............... -9,897 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Science program direction............................. 177,779 203,913 186,695 +8,916 -17,218 Workforce development for teachers and scientists.................. 8,044 13,583 13,583 +5,539 ............... Congressionally directed projects.................................. 123,623 ............... 58,500 -65,123 +58,500 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUBTOTAL, SCIENCE............................................ 4,023,316 4,721,969 4,640,469 +617,153 -81,500 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Use of prior year balances......................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... Less security charge for reimbursable work......................... -5,605 ............... ............... +5,605 ............... ==================================================================================== TOTAL, SCIENCE............................................... 4,017,711 4,721,969 4,640,469 +622,758 -81,500 ==================================================================================== NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL Repository program................................................. 117,906 172,388 118,457 +551 -53,931 Program direction.................................................. 69,363 74,983 74,983 +5,620 ............... Congressionally directed projects.................................. ............... ............... 1,950 +1,950 +1,950 ==================================================================================== TOTAL, NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL................................ 187,269 247,371 195,390 +8,121 -51,981 ==================================================================================== INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY GUARANTEE PROGRAM Administrative operations.......................................... 5,459 19,880 19,880 +14,421 ............... Offsetting collection.............................................. -1,000 -19,880 -19,880 -18,880 ............... Advance appropriation (Public Law 110-161)......................... 42,000 25,000 25,000 -17,000 ............... Proposed change in subsidy cost.................................... ............... 355,000 355,000 +355,000 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL, INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY GUARANTEE PROGRAM............... 46,459 380,000 380,000 +333,541 ............... ==================================================================================== DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION Administrative operations: Salaries and expenses: Office of the Secretary.................................... 5,751 5,700 5,700 -51 ............... Chief Financial Officer.................................... 41,998 45,048 45,048 +3,050 ............... Management................................................. 65,033 67,000 67,000 +1,967 ............... Human capital management................................... 27,986 31,436 31,436 +3,450 ............... Chief Information Officer.................................. 47,106 53,738 53,738 +6,632 ............... Congressional and intergovernmental affairs................ 4,733 4,700 4,700 -33 ............... Economic impact and diversity.............................. 5,614 3,545 3,545 -2,069 ............... General Counsel............................................ 29,889 31,233 31,233 +1,344 ............... Policy and international affairs........................... 18,831 19,469 19,469 +638 ............... Public affairs............................................. 3,339 3,780 3,780 +441 ............... Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs................ ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Salaries and expenses.......................... 250,280 265,649 265,649 +15,369 ............... Program support: Minority economic impact................................... 829 855 855 +26 ............... Policy analysis and system studies......................... 621 1,000 1,000 +379 ............... Environmental policy studies............................... 528 531 531 +3 ............... Climate change technology program (prog. supp)............. 1,059 2,000 2,000 +941 ............... Cybersecurity and secure communications.................... 34,865 34,512 34,512 -353 ............... Corporate management information program................... 28,164 27,250 27,250 -914 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Program support................................ 66,066 66,148 66,148 +82 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Administrative operations......................... 316,346 331,797 331,797 +15,451 ............... Cost of work for others........................................ 91,420 48,537 48,537 -42,883 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUBTOTAL, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION........................ 407,766 380,334 380,334 -27,432 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Funding from other defense activities.............................. -98,104 -108,190 -108,190 -10,086 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Departmental administration (gross)................... 309,662 272,144 272,144 -37,518 ............... ==================================================================================== Miscellaneous revenues............................................. -161,247 -117,317 -117,317 +43,930 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION (net)..................... 148,415 154,827 154,827 +6,412 ............... ==================================================================================== OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL........................................ 46,057 51,927 51,927 +5,870 ............... ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION WEAPONS ACTIVITIES: Life extension program: B61 Life extension program................................. 61,908 2,189 2,189 -59,719 ............... W76 Life extension program................................. 172,213 209,196 209,196 +36,983 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Life extension program............................ 234,121 211,385 211,385 -22,736 ............... Stockpile systems: B61 Stockpile systems...................................... 73,655 80,434 80,434 +6,779 ............... W62 Stockpile systems...................................... 2,112 1,645 1,645 -467 ............... W76 Stockpile systems...................................... 67,914 68,418 68,418 +504 ............... W78 Stockpile systems...................................... 38,245 43,349 43,349 +5,104 ............... W80 Stockpile systems...................................... 31,753 32,034 32,034 +281 ............... B83 Stockpile systems...................................... 24,534 25,759 25,759 +1,225 ............... W87 Stockpile systems...................................... 56,054 37,189 37,189 -18,865 ............... W88 Stockpile systems...................................... 45,820 49,854 49,854 +4,034 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Stockpile systems................................. 340,087 338,682 338,682 -1,405 ............... Reliable replacement warhead................................... ............... 10,000 ............... ............... -10,000 Weapons dismantlement and disposition: Operations and maintenance................................. 134,675 116,822 138,822 +4,147 +22,000 Construction: 99-D-141 Pit disassembly and conversion ............... 66,890 66,890 +66,890 ............... facility, SRS............................................. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Weapons dismantlement and disposition............. 134,675 183,712 205,712 +71,037 +22,000 Stockpile services: Production support......................................... 279,529 302,126 302,126 +22,597 ............... Research and development support........................... 32,691 36,231 36,231 +3,540 ............... Research and development certification and safety.......... 178,504 193,375 193,375 +14,871 ............... Management, technology, and production..................... 201,645 201,375 201,375 -270 ............... Pit manufacturing.......................................... ............... 145,269 145,269 +145,269 ............... Pit manufacturing capability............................... ............... 53,560 10,000 +10,000 -43,560 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Stockpile services................................ 692,369 931,936 888,376 +196,007 -43,560 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Directed stockpile work........................... 1,401,252 1,675,715 1,644,155 +242,903 -31,560 Campaigns: Science campaign: Advanced certification, non-RRW........................ 14,866 20,000 20,000 +5,134 ............... Primary assessment technologies........................ 62,312 74,413 82,413 +20,101 +8,000 Dynamic plutonium experiments.......................... ............... 23,734 28,734 +28,734 +5,000 Dynamic materials properties........................... 96,140 85,805 85,805 -10,335 ............... Advanced radiography................................... 30,402 29,418 29,418 -984 ............... Secondary assessment technologies...................... 78,999 79,292 79,292 +293 ............... Test readiness......................................... 4,905 10,408 5,408 +503 -5,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Science campaigns.......................... 287,624 323,070 331,070 +43,446 +8,000 Engineering campaign: Enhanced surety, non-RRW............................... 34,137 35,641 45,641 +11,504 +10,000 Weapons system engineering assessment technology....... 19,314 17,105 17,105 -2,209 ............... Nuclear survivability.................................. 8,644 21,753 21,753 +13,109 ............... Enhanced surveillance.................................. 79,073 68,243 78,243 -830 +10,000 Microsystem and engineering science applications 7,485 ............... ............... -7,485 ............... [MESA], other project costs........................... Construction: 08-D-806 Ion beam laboratory refurbishment, SNL, 9,911 ............... ............... -9,911 ............... Albuquerque, NM................................... 01-D-108 Microsystem and engineering science 10,984 ............... ............... -10,984 ............... applications [MESA], SNL, Albuquerque, NM......... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, MESA................................... 28,380 ............... ............... -28,380 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Engineering campaign................... 169,548 142,742 162,742 -6,806 +20,000 Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield campaign: Ignition............................................... 103,029 103,644 103,644 +615 ............... NIF diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support... 68,107 68,248 68,248 +141 ............... Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion............... 10,241 8,920 10,920 +679 +2,000 Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas 3,152 3,147 3,147 -5 ............... Facility operations and target production.............. 112,012 180,384 210,384 +98,372 +30,000 Inertial fusion technology............................. 29,426 ............... ............... -29,426 ............... Naval Research Laboratory.............................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... NIF assembly and installation.......................... 134,294 56,899 56,899 -77,395 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal............................................. 460,261 421,242 453,242 -7,019 +32,000 Construction: 96-D-111 National ignition facility, LLNL 9,945 ............... ............... -9,945 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Inertial confinement fusion................ 470,206 421,242 453,242 -16,964 +32,000 Advanced simulation and computing.......................... 574,537 561,742 573,742 -795 +12,000 Pit manufacturing and certification: Pit manufacturing...................................... 137,323 ............... ............... -137,323 ............... Pit certification...................................... 37,273 ............... ............... -37,273 ............... Pit manufacturing capability........................... 39,235 ............... ............... -39,235 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Pit manufacturing and certification........ 213,831 ............... ............... -213,831 ............... Readiness campaign: Stockpile readiness.................................... 18,562 28,731 21,731 +3,169 -7,000 High explosives and weapon operations.................. 9,647 8,927 8,927 -720 ............... Nonnuclear readiness................................... 25,103 40,165 33,165 +8,062 -7,000 Tritium readiness...................................... 71,831 82,265 71,265 -566 -11,000 Advanced design and production technologies............ 32,945 22,949 22,949 -9,996 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Readiness campaign......................... 158,088 183,037 158,037 -51 -25,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Campaigns..................................... 1,873,834 1,631,833 1,678,833 -195,001 +47,000 Readiness in technical base and facilities [RTBF]: Operations of facilities: Kansas City Plant...................................... 84,702 122,389 103,389 +18,687 -19,000 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory................. 89,303 85,160 85,160 -4,143 ............... Los Alamos National Laboratory......................... 285,025 298,112 298,112 +13,087 ............... Nevada Test Site....................................... 64,863 92,203 92,203 +27,340 ............... Pantex................................................. 112,813 104,361 104,361 -8,452 ............... Sandia National Laboratory............................. 153,873 127,827 127,827 -26,046 ............... Savannah River Site.................................... 85,738 108,114 108,114 +22,376 ............... Y-12 Productions Plant................................. 224,190 216,904 216,904 -7,286 ............... Institutional Site Support............................. 53,948 57,837 57,837 +3,889 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, operations of facilities................... 1,154,455 1,212,907 1,193,907 +39,452 -19,000 Program readiness.......................................... 70,099 73,841 73,841 +3,742 ............... Material recycle and recovery.............................. 71,567 72,509 72,509 +942 ............... Containers................................................. 21,760 23,398 23,398 +1,638 ............... Storage.................................................... 34,462 29,846 29,846 -4,616 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, RTBF........................................... 1,352,343 1,412,501 1,393,501 +41,158 -19,000 Construction: 09-D-007, LANSCE Refurbishment PED Los Alamos National ............... ............... 35,000 +35,000 +35,000 La, Los Alamos, NM.................................... 09-D-404, Test capabilities revitalization II, Sandia ............... 3,200 3,200 +3,200 ............... National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM................ 08-D-801 High pressure fire loop [HPFL] Pantex Plant, 6,866 2,000 2,000 -4,866 ............... Amerillo, TX.......................................... 08-D-802 High explosive pressing facility Pantex Plant, 15,008 28,233 28,233 +13,225 ............... Amerillo, TX.......................................... 08-D-804 TA-55 Reinvestment project, Los Alamos 5,885 7,900 7,900 +2,015 ............... National Laboratory [LANL]............................ 08-D-806 Ion beam laboratory refurbishment, SNL ............... 10,014 10,014 +10,014 ............... Albuquerque, NM....................................... 07-D-140 Project engineering and design [PED], various 2,452 7,446 7,446 +4,994 ............... locations............................................. 07-D-220 Radioactive liquid waste treatment facility 26,162 19,660 19,660 -6,502 ............... upgrade project, LANL................................. 06-D-140 Project engineering and design [PED], various 41,552 104,661 47,083 +5,531 -57,578 locations............................................. 06-D-402 NTS replace fire stations 1 & 2 Nevada Test 6,591 9,340 9,340 +2,749 ............... Site, NV.............................................. 05-D-140 Project engineering and design [PED], various 1,961 ............... ............... -1,961 ............... locations............................................. 05-D-402 Beryllium capability [BEC] project, Y-12 ............... 5,015 5,015 +5,015 ............... National security complex, Oak Ridge, TN.............. 04-D-125 Chemistry and metallurgy facility replacement 74,141 100,200 125,000 +50,859 +24,800 project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.................................................... 04-D-128 TA-18 mission relocation project, Los Alamos 28,892 10,353 10,353 -18,539 ............... Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM............................ 01-D-124 HEU materials facility, Y-12 plant, Oak Ridge, 75,528 ............... ............... -75,528 ............... TN.................................................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Construction............................... 285,038 308,022 310,244 +25,206 +2,222 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Readiness in technical base and facilities.... 1,637,381 1,720,523 1,703,745 +66,364 -16,778 Facilities and infrastructure recapitalization pgm............. 118,471 99,550 93,550 -24,921 -6,000 Construction: 08-D-601 Mercury highway, Nevada Test Site, NV......... 7,651 11,700 11,700 +4,049 ............... 08-D-602 Portable water system upgrades Y-12 Plant, Oak 22,070 27,666 27,666 +5,596 ............... Ridge, TN............................................. 07-D-253 TA 1 heating systems modernization [HSM] 12,751 15,755 15,755 +3,004 ............... Sandia National Laboratory............................ 06-D-601 Electrical distribution system upgrade, Pantex 2,452 4,000 4,000 +1,548 ............... Plant, Amarillo, TX................................... 06-D-602 Gas main and distribution system upgrade, 1,863 ............... ............... -1,863 ............... Pantex Plant, Amarillo, TX............................ 06-D-603 Steam plant life extension project [SLEP], Y- 14,733 10,878 10,878 -3,855 ............... 12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, TN.......... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Construction............................. 61,520 69,999 69,999 +8,479 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Facilities and infrastructure 179,991 169,549 163,549 -16,442 -6,000 recapitalization program.......................... Transformation disposition..................................... ............... 77,391 ............... ............... -77,391 Safeguards and security: Secure transportation asset: Operations and equipment............................... 128,343 131,651 131,651 +3,308 ............... Program direction...................................... 83,180 89,421 89,421 +6,241 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Secure transportation asset................ 211,523 221,072 221,072 +9,549 ............... Defense nuclear security................................... 728,123 690,217 690,217 -37,906 ............... Construction: 08-D-701 Nuclear materials S&S upgrade project Los 48,550 46,000 46,000 -2,550 ............... Alamos National Laboratory........................ 05-D-170 Project engineering and design [PED], 7,847 1,111 1,111 -6,736 ............... various locations................................. 08-D-702 Material security consolidation project, 14,713 ............... ............... -14,713 ............... Idaho National Lab, ID............................ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Construction........................... 71,110 47,111 47,111 -23,999 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Defense nuclear security............... 799,233 737,328 737,328 -61,905 ............... Cybersecurity.............................................. 100,287 122,511 122,511 +22,224 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Safeguards and security........................... 899,520 859,839 859,839 -39,681 ............... Environmental projects and operations: Long term stewardship... 8,592 40,587 28,316 +19,724 -12,271 Nuclear weapons incident response.............................. 158,655 221,936 221,936 +63,281 ............... Congressionally directed projects.............................. 47,232 ............... 3,500 -43,732 +3,500 Less security charge for reimbursable work..................... -34,000 ............... ............... +34,000 ............... Use of prior year balances..................................... -86,514 -366 -366 +86,148 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUBTOTAL, WEAPONS ACTIVITIES................................. 6,297,466 6,618,079 6,524,579 +227,113 -93,500 Rescission of prior year balances.............................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ==================================================================================== TOTAL, WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.................................... 6,297,466 6,618,079 6,524,579 +227,113 -93,500 ==================================================================================== DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION Nonproliferation and verification, R&D............................. 362,424 261,944 336,944 -25,480 +75,000 Construction: 07-SC-05 Physical Science Facility, Pacific Northwest ............... 13,147 13,147 +13,147 ............... National Laboratory, Richland, WA......................... 06-D-180 06-01 Project engineering and design [PED] 24,772 ............... ............... -24,772 ............... National Security Laboratory, PNNL........................ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Nonproliferation & verification R&D............ 387,196 275,091 350,091 -37,105 +75,000 Nonproliferation and international security........................ 149,993 140,467 175,467 +25,474 +35,000 International nuclear materials protection and cooperation......... 624,482 429,694 429,694 -194,788 ............... Elimination of weapons-grade plutonium production program.......... 179,940 141,299 141,299 -38,641 ............... Fissile materials disposition: U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition..................... ............... 40,774 40,774 +40,774 ............... U.S. uranium disposition....................................... 66,235 ............... ............... -66,235 ............... Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility: Operations and maintenance................................. ............... 19,200 19,200 +19,200 ............... Construction and other project costs: 99-D-143 MOX fuel ............... 467,808 467,808 +467,808 ............... fabrication facility...................................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility.......... ............... 487,008 487,008 +487,008 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, U.S. surplus fissile materials disp............ 66,235 527,782 527,782 +461,547 ............... Russian surplus materials disposition.......................... ............... 1,000 1,000 +1,000 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Fissile materials disposition......................... 66,235 528,782 528,782 +462,547 ............... Global threat reduction initiative................................. 193,225 219,641 284,641 +91,416 +65,000 International nuclear fuel bank.................................... 49,545 ............... ............... -49,545 ............... Congressionally directed projects.................................. 7,380 ............... ............... -7,380 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation................... 1,657,996 1,734,974 1,909,974 +251,978 +175,000 Use of prior year balances......................................... ............... -918 -918 -918 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation................... 1,657,996 1,734,056 1,909,056 +251,060 +175,000 Rescissions: Rescission of prior year balances--Russian Surplus Materials -57,000 ............... ............... +57,000 ............... Disposition program........................................... Rescission of prior year balances--Fissile materials -115,000 ............... ............... +115,000 ............... disposition MOX construction line............................. Rescission of prior year balances for Emergency Supplemental -150,000 ............... ............... +150,000 ............... for fiscal year 1999 (H.R. 4328, Public Law 102-277).......... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Rescissions......................................... -322,000 ............... ............... +322,000 ............... ==================================================================================== TOTAL, DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION.................... 1,335,996 1,734,056 1,909,056 +573,060 +175,000 ==================================================================================== NAVAL REACTORS Naval reactors development......................................... 732,374 771,600 771,600 +39,226 ............... Construction: 09-D-190, PED, Infrastructure upgrades, KAPL................... ............... 1,000 1,000 +1,000 ............... 09-D-902, NRF Office Building #2, ECC upgrade, Idaho........... ............... 8,300 8,300 +8,300 ............... 08-D-901 Shipping and receiving and warehouse complex [SRWC], 8,918 ............... ............... -8,918 ............... BAPL.......................................................... 08-D-190 Project engineering and design, Expended Core Facility 545 300 300 -245 ............... M-290 recovering discharge station, Naval Reactor Facility, ID 07-D-190 Materials research technology complex [MRTC].......... 446 12,400 12,400 +11,954 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Construction....................................... 9,909 22,000 22,000 +12,091 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Naval reactors development............................ 742,283 793,600 793,600 +51,317 ............... Program direction.................................................. 32,403 34,454 34,454 +2,051 ............... ==================================================================================== TOTAL, NAVAL REACTORS........................................ 774,686 828,054 828,054 +53,368 ............... ==================================================================================== OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR Office of the Administrator........................................ 379,997 404,081 404,081 +24,084 ............... Congressionally directed projects.................................. 22,140 ............... ............... -22,140 ............... ==================================================================================== TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR........................... 402,137 404,081 404,081 +1,944 ............... ==================================================================================== TOTAL, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.............. 8,810,285 9,584,270 9,665,770 +855,485 +81,500 ==================================================================================== DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP Closure Sites...................................................... 42,050 45,883 59,383 +17,333 +13,500 Hanford Site: Operating projects 2012 accelerated completions................ 419,189 400,902 490,479 +71,290 +89,577 Operating projects 2035 accelerated completions................ 467,309 450,885 530,085 +62,776 +79,200 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Hanford Site.......................................... 886,498 851,787 1,020,564 +134,066 +168,777 Idaho National Laboratory.......................................... 508,358 432,124 465,124 -43,234 +33,000 NNSA: NNSA Service Center/SPRU....................................... 28,831 16,943 21,943 -6,888 +5,000 Nevada......................................................... 80,368 65,674 75,674 -4,694 +10,000 California site support........................................ 367 ............... ............... -367 ............... Pantex......................................................... 20,027 ............... ............... -20,027 ............... Sandia National Laboratories................................... ............... ............... 3,000 +3,000 +3,000 Los Alamos National Laboratory................................. 152,070 162,467 245,467 +93,397 +83,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites....................... 281,663 245,084 346,084 +64,421 +101,000 Oak Ridge Reservation.............................................. 190,535 237,670 255,000 +64,465 +17,330 Office of River Protection: Waste treatment & immobilization plant......................... 683,722 690,000 690,000 +6,278 ............... Tank Farm activities: Rad liquid tank waste stabil. and disposition.............. 285,351 288,443 341,443 +56,092 +53,000 River protection community and regulatory support.......... 467 ............... ............... -467 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Tank Farm activities........................... 285,818 288,443 341,443 +55,625 +53,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Office of River Protection........................ 969,540 978,443 1,031,443 +61,903 +53,000 Savannah River site: 04-D-423 Container surveillance capability in 235F............. 10,900 ............... ............... -10,900 ............... 04-D-414 Project Engineering and Design, 105-K................. ............... 2,032 2,032 +2,032 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, 2012 accelerated completions....................... 10,900 2,032 2,032 -8,868 ............... Operating projects 2035 accelerated completions.................... 509,394 498,651 557,187 +47,793 +58,536 Construction: 08-D-414 Project engineering and design Plutonium 991 ............... ............... -991 ............... Vitrification Facility, VL.................................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, 2035 accelerated completions....................... 510,385 498,651 557,187 +46,802 +58,536 Tank Farm activities: Rad liquid tank waste stabil. and disposition.............. 513,799 578,218 578,218 +64,419 ............... 05-D-405, Salt waste processing facility................... 87,199 127,524 127,524 +40,325 ............... 03-D-414, Salt waste processing facility PED SR............ 9,910 ............... ............... -9,910 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Tank farm activities........................... 610,908 705,742 705,742 +94,834 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Savannah River site............................... 1,132,193 1,206,425 1,264,961 +132,768 +58,536 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant........................................ 234,585 211,524 231,661 -2,924 +20,137 Program direction.................................................. 306,941 308,765 308,765 +1,824 ............... Program support.................................................... 32,844 33,930 33,930 +1,086 ............... Safeguards and Security............................................ 259,332 251,341 260,341 +1,009 +9,000 Technology development............................................. 21,194 32,389 22,250 +1,056 -10,139 Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution........................... 458,787 463,000 463,000 +4,213 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUBTOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN UP..................... 5,324,520 5,298,365 5,762,506 +437,986 +464,141 ==================================================================================== Congressionally directed projects.................................. 17,195 ............... 9,000 -8,195 +9,000 Use of prior year balances......................................... ............... -1,109 ............... ............... +1,109 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN UP........................ 5,341,715 5,297,256 5,771,506 +429,791 +474,250 ==================================================================================== OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES Health, safety and security: Health, safety and security.................................... 326,324 347,271 347,271 +20,947 ............... Program direction.............................................. 99,137 99,597 99,597 +460 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Health, safety and security........................... 425,461 446,868 446,868 +21,407 ............... Office of Legacy Management: Legacy management.............................................. 144,060 174,397 174,397 +30,337 ............... Program direction.............................................. 10,901 11,584 11,584 +683 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Office of Legacy Management........................... 154,961 185,981 185,981 +31,020 ............... Nuclear energy: Infrastructure: Idaho sitewide safeguards and 75,261 78,811 78,811 +3,550 ............... security.......................................................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Nuclear energy........................................ 75,261 78,811 78,811 +3,550 ............... Defense related administrative support............................. 98,104 108,190 108,190 +10,086 ............... Office of Hearings and Appeals..................................... 4,565 6,603 6,603 +2,038 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Other Defense Activities........................... 758,352 826,453 826,453 +68,101 ............... ==================================================================================== Congressionally directed projects.................................. ............... ............... 1,050 +1,050 +1,050 Less security charge for reimbursable work......................... -3,003 ............... ............... +3,003 ............... Use of prior year balances......................................... -990 ............... ............... +990 ............... ==================================================================================== TOTAL, OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES.............................. 754,359 826,453 827,503 +73,144 +1,050 ==================================================================================== DEFENSE NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL..................................... 199,171 247,371 193,000 -6,171 -54,371 ==================================================================================== TOTAL, ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES...................... 15,105,530 15,955,350 16,457,779 +1,352,249 +502,429 ==================================================================================== POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION: Operation and maintenance: Purchase power and wheeling................................ 62,215 63,522 63,522 +1,307 ............... Program direction.......................................... 6,404 7,420 7,420 +1,016 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Operation and maintenance...................... 68,619 70,942 70,942 +2,323 ............... Less alternative financing (PPW)............................... -13,802 -14,002 -14,002 -200 ............... Offsetting collections......................................... -48,413 -49,520 -49,520 -1,107 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION..................... 6,404 7,420 7,420 +1,016 ............... ==================================================================================== SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION: Operation and maintenance: Operating expenses......................................... 11,892 12,865 12,865 +973 ............... Purchase power and wheeling................................ 45,000 46,000 46,000 +1,000 ............... Program direction.......................................... 22,054 24,330 24,330 +2,276 ............... Construction............................................... 4,269 5,991 5,991 +1,722 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Operation and maintenance...................... 83,215 89,186 89,186 +5,971 ............... Less alternative financing (for program direction)............. -877 -2,200 -2,200 -1,323 ............... Less alternative financing (for O&M)........................... -6,304 -9,381 -9,381 -3,077 ............... Less alternative financing (PPW)............................... -10,000 -11,000 -11,000 -1,000 ............... Less alternative financing (Const.)............................ -869 -3,191 -3,191 -2,322 ............... Offsetting collections......................................... -35,000 -35,000 -35,000 ............... ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION..................... 30,165 28,414 28,414 -1,751 ............... ==================================================================================== WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION: Operation and maintenance: Construction and rehabilitation............................ 62,419 74,544 74,544 +12,125 ............... Operation and maintenance.................................. 52,873 52,365 52,365 -508 ............... Purchase power and wheeling................................ 475,254 525,960 600,960 +125,706 +75,000 Program direction.......................................... 156,128 166,423 166,423 +10,295 ............... Utah mitigation and conservation........................... 7,114 7,342 7,342 +228 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Operation and maintenance...................... 753,788 826,634 901,634 +147,846 +75,000 Less alternative financing (for O&M)........................... -5,000 -15,499 -15,499 -10,499 ............... Less alternative financing (for Const.)........................ -30,690 -72,663 -47,663 -16,973 +25,000 Less alternative financing (for Program direction)............. -10,000 -15,800 -15,800 -5,800 ............... Less alternative financing (for PPW)........................... -166,552 -197,842 -197,842 -31,290 ............... Offsetting collections (Public Law 108-477, Public Law 109-103) -308,702 -328,118 -403,118 -94,416 -75,000 Offsetting collections (Public Law 98-381)..................... -3,937 -3,366 -3,366 +571 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL, WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION..................... 228,907 193,346 218,346 -10,561 +25,000 ==================================================================================== FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND: Operation and 2,477 2,959 2,959 +482 ............... maintenance....................................................... ==================================================================================== TOTAL, POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS....................... 267,953 232,139 257,139 -10,814 +25,000 ==================================================================================== FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION: Federal energy regulatory commission........................... 260,425 273,400 273,400 +12,975 ............... FERC revenues.................................................. -260,425 -273,400 -273,400 -12,975 ............... ==================================================================================== GRAND TOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY............................ 24,122,361 25,917,888 27,041,658 +2,919,297 +1,123,770 (Total amount appropriated).............................. (24,294,361) (25,743,888) (26,867,658) (+2,573,297) (+1,123,770) (Rescissions, including emergency funding)............... (-322,000) ............... ............... (+322,000) ............... (Deferrals).............................................. (108,000) (149,000) (149,000) (+41,000) ............... (Advance appropriation).................................. (42,000) (25,000) (25,000) (-17,000) ............... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL PROVISIONS--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY The following list of general provisions is recommended by the Committee. The recommendation includes several provisions which have been included in previous Energy and Water Appropriations Acts and new provisions as follows: Section 301. Language is included under section 301 to provide incentives for downblending of highly enriched uranium. Section 302. Language is included under section 302, which prohibits the use of funds in this act to initiate a request for proposal of expression of interest for new programs which have not yet been presented to Congress in the annual budget submission and which have not yet been approved and funded by Congress. Section 303. Language is included under section 303 which prohibits the use of funds for severance payments under the worker and community transition program under section 3161 of Public Law 102-484. Section 304. Language is included under section 304 to prohibit the augmentation of several payments under section 3161 of Public Law 102-484 unless a reprogramming request is submitted to Congress. Section 305. Language is included in section 305, which permits the transfer and merger of unexpended balances of prior appropriations with appropriation accounts established in this bill. Section 306. Language is included that prohibits the use of funds by the Bonneville Power Administration to enter into energy efficiency contracts outside its service area. Section 307. This section establishes certain notice and competition requirements for Department of Energy user facilities. Section 308. Language is included specifically authorizing intelligence activities pending enactment of the fiscal year 2008 Intelligence Authorization Act. Section 309. Language included in section 309 related to laboratory directed research and development authorizes an increase of 2 percent in laboratory directed research and development funds for the purpose of diversifying the laboratories' activities in the areas of energy security and global climate science and modeling. Section 310. Language is included regarding transfer authority. Section 311. The Committee has included a provision related to general plant projects. Section 312. The Committee has included a provision related to the Reno Hydrogen Fuel Project. Section 313. The Committee has included a provision related to the integrated university program. Section 314. The Committee has included a provision related to naming laboratory facilities. TITLE IV INDEPENDENT AGENCIES Appalachian Regional Commission Appropriations, 2008.................................... $73,032,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 65,000,000 Committee recommendation................................ 85,000,000 Established in 1965, the Appalachian Regional Commission is an economic development agency composed of 13 Appalachian States and a Federal co-chair appointed by the President. For fiscal year 2009, the Committee recommends $85,000,000 for the ARC, of which $6,325,000 is for salaries and expenses and $71,675,000 is for area development and $7,000,000 is for local development districts. Area Development and Technical Assistant Program funds are used to increase job opportunities and income, improve education and health, strengthen infrastructure, and for the Appalachian Highway System. Such funds are allocated by formula, with assistance targeted to the most distressed and underdeveloped areas. Local Development Districts Program funds assist local governments in promoting sustainable community and economic development in the Appalachian region. The Committee recognizes the importance of trade and investment opportunities to the Appalachian Region and is encouraged by the findings in a report that Appalachian firms could find significant trade and investment opportunities, particularly in the energy, high technology, and transportation sectors in the Republic of Turkey and the surrounding region. In this regard, the Committee supports the Appalachian-Turkish Trade Project [ATTP], a project to promote opportunities to expand trade, encourage business interests, stimulate foreign studies, and to build a lasting and mutually meaningful relationship between Appalachian States and the Republic of Turkey, as well as the neighboring regions, such as Greece. The Committee commends the ARC for its leadership role in helping to implement the mission of the ATTP. The Committee expects the ARC to continue to be a prominent ATTP sponsor. The Committee has included no earmarks in the ARC funds. The Commission allocates its funds by formula to its member States, based primarily on need. Under the Commission's formula system, earmarks out of ARC's base funding could come at the expense of those States that have no earmarks. Accordingly, the Committee directs that any earmarks in any State be taken from within that State's regular ARC allocation. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board SALARIES AND EXPENSES Appropriations, 2008.................................... $21,909,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 25,499,000 Committee recommendation................................ 25,499,000 For fiscal year 2009, the Committee recommends $25,499,000, the same as the President's request, for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board [DNFSB]. This Board is responsible for evaluating the implementation of standards for design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of the Department of Energy's defense nuclear facilities. Based on these evaluations, the Board makes specific recommendations to the Secretary of Energy to ensure that both public and employee heath and safety are protected. The Committee encourages the DNFSB to undertake the responsibility to provide cost estimates to accompany their recommendations. Delta Regional Authority Appropriations, 2008.................................... $11,685,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 6,000,000 Committee recommendation................................ 20,000,000 For the Delta Regional Authority, the Committee recommends $20,000,000. The Delta Regional Authority was established to assist the eight State Mississippi Delta Region in obtaining basic infrastructure, transportation, skills training, and opportunities for economic development. The Government Accountability Office recently reported that the DRA has a commendable record in the percentage of funds spent in rural America, and the Committee recognizes the DRA's role in bettering this underserved area of the Nation. Denali Commission Appropriations, 2008.................................... $21,800,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 1,800,000 Committee recommendation................................ 21,800,000 The Denali Commission is a Federal-State partnership responsible for promoting infrastructure development, job training, and other economic development services in rural areas throughout Alaska. For fiscal year 2009, the Committee recommends $21,800,000. Nuclear Regulatory Commission SALARIES AND EXPENSES Appropriations, 2008.................................... $917,334,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 1,007,956,000 Committee recommendation................................ 1,022,956,000 REVENUES Appropriations, 2008.................................... -$771,220,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... -847,357,000 Committee recommendation................................ -860,857,000 NET APPROPRIATION Appropriations, 2008.................................... $146,114,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 160,599,000 Committee recommendation................................ 162,099,000 The Committee recommendation for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for fiscal year 2009 is $1,022,956, an increase of $15,000,000 over the budget request. This amount is offset by estimated revenues of $860,857,000 resulting in a net appropriation of $162,099,000. The Committee has provided $15,000,000 to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to support its participation in an Integrated University Program. The Committee recommends $10,000,000 of this amount to be used to support university programs relevant to the NRC mission. In addition, not less than $5,000,000 of this amount will be used for grants to support research projects that do not align with programmatic missions but are critical to maintaining the discipline of nuclear science and engineering. OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL GROSS APPROPRIATION Appropriations, 2008.................................... $8,744,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 9,044,000 Committee recommendation................................ 9,344,000 REVENUES Appropriations, 2008.................................... -$7,870,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... -8,140,600 Committee recommendation................................ -8,410,000 NET APPROPRIATION Appropriations, 2008.................................... $874,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 904,000 Committee recommendation................................ 934,000 The Committee recommends an appropriation of $9,344,000, an increase of $300,000 over the budget request. The additional funds will provide the Office of Inspector General with the necessary resources to provide effective oversight of the agency's IT security controls and information to identify vulnerabilities and mitigate risks to the agency's operations. The Committee also recommends that the current no year funding authority of the Office of Inspector General be retained. The Office of Inspector General, as an administrative entity, is fully integrated into the administrative processes at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to include its accounting, pay and travel system, as well as other infrastructure support systems. In addition, the proposed 2-year funding authority could limit the continuity of the Inspector General's oversight. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Appropriations, 2008.................................... $3,621,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 3,811,000 Committee recommendation................................ 3,811,000 The Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board was established to evaluate the scientific and technical validity of the Department of Energy's nuclear waste disposal program. The Board reports its findings no fewer than two times a year to Congress and to the Secretary of Energy. For fiscal year 2009, the Committee recommends $3,811,000. Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects Appropriation, 2008..................................... $2,261,000 Budget estimate, 2009................................... 4,400,000 Committee recommendation................................ 4,400,000 The Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects was established as an independent agency in the executive branch on December 13, 2006, pursuant to the Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Act of 2004. The Committee recommends $4,400,000, the same as the budget request. Tennessee Valley Authority OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL GROSS APPROPRIATION Appropriations, 2008.................................................... Budget estimate, 2009................................... $17,000,000 Committee recommendation................................................ OFFSET FROM TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY FUND Appropriations, 2008.................................................... Budget estimate, 2009................................... -$17,000,000 Committee recommendation................................................ The Committee recommendation does not include the administration's proposal to establish a congressionally funded Office of the Inspector General to oversee the Tennessee Valley Authority. In recent years, the TVA has funded the requests of the TVA-IG office out of power revenues and receipts. This process has worked well, and the Committee sees no compelling reason to change that mechanism for funding the TVA-IG. General Provision, Independent Agencies The following general provision is recommended by the Committee. TITLE V GENERAL PROVISIONS The following list of general provisions are recommended by the Committee. Section 501. The provision prohibits the use of any funds provided in this bill from being used to influence congressional action. Section 502. The provision addresses transfer authority under this act. COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment to the House bill ``which proposes an item of appropriation which is not made to carry out the provisions of an existing law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously passed by the Senate during that session.'' The Committee recommends funding for the following programs or activities which currently lack authorization for fiscal year 2009: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: General Investigations; Construction, General; Mississippi River and Tributaries; Operations and Maintenance; Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program; Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation; Water and Related Resources; Department of Energy: Energy Conservation and Supply Activities: Office of Fossil Energy: Fossil Energy R&D, Clean Coal, Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Research; Health, Safety and Security; Non-Defense Environmental Management; Office of Science; Department of Administration; National Nuclear Security Administration: Weapons Activities; Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation; Naval Reactors; Office of the Administrator; Defense Environmental Management, Defense Site Acceleration Completion; Other Defense Activities; Defense Nuclear Waste Fund; Office of Security and Performance Assurance; Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; Power Marketing Administrations: Southeastern, Southwestern, Western Area; and Energy Information Administration. COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(C), RULE XXVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on July 10, 2008, the Committee ordered reported an original bill (S. 3258) making appropriations for the energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and authorized the chairman of the Committee or the chairman of the subcommittee to offer the text of the Senate bill as a Committee amendment in the nature of a substitute to the House companion measure, with the bill subject to amendment and subject to the budget allocations, by a recorded vote of 29-0, a quorum being present. The vote was as follows: Yeas Nays Chairman Byrd Mr. Inouye Mr. Leahy Mr. Harkin Ms. Mikulski Mr. Kohl Mrs. Murray Mr. Dorgan Mrs. Feinstein Mr. Durbin Mr. Johnson Ms. Landrieu Mr. Reed Mr. Lautenberg Mr. Nelson Mr. Cochran Mr. Stevens Mr. Specter Mr. Domenici Mr. Bond Mr. McConnell Mr. Shelby Mr. Gregg Mr. Bennett Mr. Craig Mrs. Hutchison Mr. Brownback Mr. Allard Mr. Alexander COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by the Committee.'' In compliance with this rule, changes in existing law proposed to be made by the bill are shown as follows: existing law to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets; new matter is printed in italic; and existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in roman. OMNIBUS CONSOLIDATED RESCISSIONS AND APPROPRIATIONS ACT OF 1996, PUBLIC LAW 104-134 SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT OF 1996 TITLE III RESCISSIONS AND OFFSETS CHAPTER 1 ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT Subchapter A--United States Enrichment Corporation Privatization SEC. 3102. DEFINITIONS. [For purposes] Except as provided in section 3112A, for purposes of this subchapter: * * * * * * * SEC. 3112. URANIUM TRANSFERS AND SALES. (a) Transfers and Sales by the Secretary.--The Secretary shall not provide enrichment services or transfer or sell any uranium (including natural uranium concentrates, natural uranium hexafluoride, or enriched uranium in any form) to any person except as consistent with this section. * * * * * * * (f) Savings Provision.--Nothing in this subchapter shall be read to modify the terms of the Russian HEU Agreement. SEC. 3112A. INCENTIVES FOR ADDITIONAL DOWNBLENDING OF HIGHLY ENRICHED URANIUM BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Completion of the russian heu agreement.--The term ``completion of the Russian HEU Agreement'' means the importation into the United States from the Russian Federation pursuant to the Russian HEU Agreement of uranium derived from the downblending of not less than 500 metric tons of highly enriched uranium of weapons origin. (2) Downblending.--The term ``downblending'' means processing highly enriched uranium into a uranium product in any form in which the uranium contains less than 20 percent uranium-235. (3) Highly enriched uranium.--The term ``highly enriched uranium'' has the meaning given that term in section 3102(4). (4) Highly enriched uranium of weapons origin.--The term ``highly enriched uranium of weapons origin'' means highly enriched uranium that-- (A) contains 90 percent or more uranium- 235; and (B) is verified by the Secretary of Energy to be of weapons origin. (5) Low-enriched uranium.--The term ``low-enriched uranium'' means a uranium product in any form, including uranium hexafluoride (UF<INF>6</INF>) and uranium oxide (UO<INF>2</INF>), in which the uranium contains less than 20 percent uranium-235, including natural uranium, without regard to whether the uranium is incorporated into fuel rods or complete fuel assemblies. (6) Russian heu agreement.--The term ``Russian HEU Agreement'' has the meaning given that term in section 3102(11). (7) Uranium-235.--The term ``uranium-235'' means the isotope \235\U. (b) Statement of Policy.--It is the policy of the United States to support the continued downblending of highly enriched uranium of weapons origin in the Russian Federation in order to protect the essential security interests of the United States with respect to the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons. (c) Promotion of Downblending of Russian Highly Enriched Uranium.-- (1) Completion of the russian heu agreement.--Prior to the completion of the Russian HEU Agreement, the importation into the United States of low-enriched uranium, including low-enriched uranium obtained under contracts for separative work units, that is produced in the Russian Federation and is not imported pursuant to the Russian HEU Agreement, may not exceed the following amounts: (A) In the 4-year period beginning with calendar year 2008, 16,559 kilograms. (B) In calendar year 2012, 24,839 kilograms. (C) In calendar year 2013 and each calendar year thereafter through the calendar year of the completion of the Russian HEU Agreement, 41,398 kilograms. (2) Incentives to continue downblending russian highly enriched uranium after the completion of the russian heu agreement.-- (A) In general.--After the completion of the Russian HEU Agreement, the importation into the United States of low-enriched uranium, including low-enriched uranium obtained under contracts for separative work units, that is produced in the Russian Federation, whether or not such low-enriched uranium is derived from highly enriched uranium of weapons origin, may not exceed-- (i) in calendar year 2014, 485,279 kilograms; (ii) in calendar year 2015, 455,142 kilograms; (iii) in calendar year 2016, 480,146 kilograms; (iv) in calendar year 2017, 490,710 kilograms; (v) in calendar year 2018, 492,731 kilograms; (vi) in calendar year 2019, 509,058 kilograms; and (vii) in calendar year 2020, 514,754 kilograms. (B) Additional imports in exchange for a commitment to downblend an additional 300 metric tons of highly enriched uranium.-- (i) In general.--In addition to the amount authorized to be imported under subparagraph (A) and except as provided in clause (ii), if the Russian Federation enters into a bilateral agreement with the United States under which the Russian Federation agrees to downblend an additional 300 metric tons of highly enriched uranium after the completion of the Russian HEU Agreement, 4 kilograms of low-enriched uranium, whether or not such low- enriched uranium is derived from highly enriched uranium of weapons origin and including low-enriched uranium obtained under contracts for separative work units, may be imported in a calendar year for every 1 kilogram of Russian highly enriched uranium of weapons origin that was downblended in the preceding calendar year, subject to the verification of the Secretary of Energy under paragraph (9). (ii) Maximum annual imports.--Not more than 120,000 kilograms of low- enriched uranium may be imported in a calendar year under clause (i). (3) Exceptions.--The import limitations described in paragraphs (1) and (2) shall not apply to low- enriched uranium produced in the Russian Federation that is imported into the United States-- (A) for use in the initial core of a new nuclear reactor; (B) for processing and to be certified for re-exportation and not for consumption in the United States; or (C) to be added to the inventory of the Department of Energy. (4) Adjustments to import limitations.-- (A) In general.--The import limitations described in paragraph (2)(A) are based on the reference data in the 2005 Market Report on the Global Nuclear Fuel Market Supply and Demand 2005-2030 of the World Nuclear Association. In each of calendar years 2016 and 2019, the Secretary of Commerce shall review the projected demand for uranium for nuclear reactors in the United States and adjust the import limitations described in paragraph (2)(A) to account for changes in such demand in years after the year in which that report or a subsequent report is published. (B) Incentive adjustment.--Beginning in the second calendar year after the calendar year of the completion of the Russian HEU Agreement, the Secretary of Energy shall increase or decrease the amount of low-enriched uranium that may be imported in a calendar year under paragraph (2)(B) (including the amount of low- enriched uranium that may be imported for each kilogram of highly enriched uranium downblended under paragraph (2)(B)(i)) by a percentage equal to the percentage increase or decrease, as the case may be, in the average amount of uranium loaded into nuclear power reactors in the United States in the most recent 3- calendar-year period for which data are available, as reported by the Energy Information Administration of the Department of Energy, compared to the average amount of uranium loaded into such reactors during the 3- calendar-year period beginning on January 1, 2011, as reported by the Energy Information Administration. (C) Publication of adjustments.--As soon as practicable, but not later than July 31 of each calendar year, the Secretary of Energy shall publish in the Federal Register the amount of low-enriched uranium that may be imported in the current calendar year after the adjustments under subparagraph (B). (5) Authority for additional adjustment.--In addition to the adjustment under paragraph (4)(A), the Secretary of Commerce may adjust the import limitations under paragraph (2)(A) for a calendar year if the Secretary-- (A) in consultation with the Secretary of Energy, determines that the available supply of low-enriched uranium and the available stockpiles of uranium of the Department of Energy are insufficient to meet demand in the United States in the following calendar year; and (B) notifies Congress of the adjustment not less than 45 days before making the adjustment. (6) Equivalent quantities of low-enriched uranium imports.-- (A) In general.--The import limitations described in paragraphs (1) and (2) are expressed in terms of uranium containing 4.4 percent uranium-235 and a tails assay of 0.3 percent. (B) Adjustment for other uranium.--Imports of low-enriched uranium under paragraphs (1) and (2), including low-enriched uranium obtained under contracts for separative work units, shall count against the import limitations described in such paragraphs in amounts calculated as the quantity of low- enriched uranium containing 4.4 percent uranium-235 necessary to equal the total amount of uranium-235 contained in such imports. (7) Downblending of other highly enriched uranium.-- (A) In general.--The downblending of highly enriched uranium not of weapons origin may be counted for purposes of paragraph (2)(B), subject to verification under paragraph (9), if the Secretary of Energy determines that the highly enriched uranium to be downblended poses a risk to the national security of the United States. (B) Equivalent quantities of highly enriched uranium.--For purposes of determining the additional low-enriched uranium imports allowed under paragraph (2)(B), highly enriched uranium not of weapons origin downblended pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall count as downblended highly enriched uranium of weapons origin in amounts calculated as the quantity of highly enriched uranium containing 90 percent uranium-235 necessary to equal the total amount of uranium-235 contained in the highly enriched uranium not of weapons origin downblended pursuant to subparagraph (A). (8) Termination of import restrictions.--The provisions of this subsection shall terminate on December 31, 2020. (9) Technical verifications by secretary of energy.-- (A) In general.--The Secretary of Energy shall verify the origin, quantity, and uranium- 235 content of the highly enriched uranium downblended for purposes of paragraphs (2)(B) and (7). (B) Methods of verification.--In conducting the verification required under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of Energy shall employ the transparency measures and access provisions agreed to under the Russian HEU Agreement for monitoring the downblending of Russian highly enriched uranium of weapons origin and such other methods as the Secretary determines appropriate. (10) Enforcement of import limitations.--The Secretary of Commerce shall be responsible for enforcing the import limitations imposed under this subsection and shall enforce such import limitations in a manner that imposes a minimal burden on the commercial nuclear industry. (11) Effect on other agreements.-- (A) Russian heu agreement.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to modify the terms of the Russian HEU Agreement, including the provisions of the Agreement relating to the amount of low-enriched uranium that may be imported into the United States. (B) Other agreements.--If a provision of any agreement between the United States and the Russian Federation, other than the Russian HEU Agreement, relating to the importation of low- enriched uranium, including low-enriched uranium obtained under contracts for separative work units, into the United States conflicts with a provision of this section, the provision of this section shall supersede the provision of the agreement to the extent of the conflict. * * * * * * * WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1996, PUBLIC LAW 104-303 TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS. (a) * * * * * * * * * * (1) * * * * * * * * * * (5) San lorenzo river, california.-- (A) In General._The project for flood control, San Lorenzo River, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of $21,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $10,900,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $10,900,000 and habitat restoration, at a total cost of $4,050,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,040,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,010,000. (B) Credit toward non-federal share.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the project the costs expended by non- Federal interests for the replacement and reconstruction of the Soquel Avenue Bridge, if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project. (C) Maximum amount of credit.--The credit under paragraph (B) may not exceed $2,000,000. (D) Limitation of total project cost.--The Secretary shall not include the costs to be credited under paragraphs (B) and (C) in total project costs in determining the amounts of the Federal and non-Federal contributions. * * * * * * * ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2004, PUBLIC LAW 108- 137 TITLE II General Provisions [Sec. 209. Endangered Species Collaborative Program. (a) Using funds previously appropriated, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation and the Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service, for purposes of improving the efficiency and expediting the efforts of the Endangered Species Act Collaborative Program Workgroup, is directed to establish an executive committee of seven members consisting of-- [(1) one member from the Bureau of Reclamation; [(2) one member from the Fish and Wildlife Service; and [(3) one member at large representing each of the following seven entities (selected at the discretion of the entity in consultation with the Bureau of Reclamation and the Fish and Wildlife Service) currently participating as signatories to the existing Memorandum of Understanding: [(A) other Federal agencies; [(B) State agencies; [(C) municipalities; [(D) universities and environmental groups; [(E) agricultural communities; [(F) Middle Rio Grande Pueblos (Sandia, Isleta, San Felipe, Cochiti, Santa Ana, and Santo Domingo); and [(G) Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District. [(b) Formation of this Committee shall not occur later than 45 days after enactment of this Act. [(c) Fiscal year 2004 appropriations shall not be obligated or expended prior to approval of a detailed spending plan by the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations. [(d) The above section shall come into effect within 180 days of enactment of this Act, unless the Bureau of Reclamation, in consultation with the above listed parties, has provided an alternative workgroup structure which has been approved by the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations.] * * * * * * * ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2006, PUBLIC LAW 109- 103 TITLE I CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Corps of Engineers--Civil GENERAL PROVISIONS, CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL Sec. 117. Lower Mississippi River Museum and Riverfront Interpretive Site, Mississippi.--The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4811) is amended by-- (1) * * * (2) in section 103(c)(7)-- (A) by striking ``There is'' and inserting the following: ``(A) In general.--There is''; and (B) by striking ``$2,000,000'' and all that follows and inserting the following: ``[$15,000,000] $26,000,000 to plan, design, and construct generally in accordance with the conceptual plan to be prepared by the Corps of Engineers. * * * * * * * Sec. 121. [(a) The Secretary of the Army may carry out and fund projects to comply with the 2003 Biological Opinion described in section 205(b) of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-447; 118 Stat. 2949) as amended by subsection (b) and may award grants and enter into contracts, cooperative agreements, or interagency agreements with participants in the Endangered Species Act Collaborative Program Workgroup referenced in section 209(a) of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2004 (Public Law 108- 137; 117 Stat. 1850) in order to carry out such projects. Any project undertaken under this subsection shall require a non-Federal cost share of 25 percent, which may be provided through in-kind services or direct cash contributions and which shall be credited on a programmatic basis instead of on a project-by-project basis, with reconciliation of total project costs and total non-Federal cost share calculated on a three year incremental basis. Non- Federal cost share that exceeds that which is required in any calculated three year increment shall be credited to subsequent three year increments.] (a) Hereafter, the Secretary of the Army may carry out and fund planning studies, watershed surveys and assessments, or technical studies at 100 percent Federal expense to accomplish the purposes of the 2003 Biological Opinion described in section 205(b) of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-447; 118 Stat. 2949) as amended by subsection (b) or any related subsequent biological opinion, and the collaborative program long-term plan. In carrying out a study, survey, or assessment under this subsection, the Secretary of the Army shall consult with Federal, State, tribal and local governmental entities, as well as entities participating in the Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Collaborative Program referred to in section 205 of this Act: Provided, That the Secretary of the Army may also provide planning and administrative assistance to the Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Collaborative Program, which shall not be subject to cost sharing requirements with non-Federal interests. * * * * * * * WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2007, PUBLIC LAW 110-114 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS SEC. 3118. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE RESTORATION, NEW MEXICO. (a) * * * (b) Project Selection.--The Secretary shall select and shall carry out restoration projects in the Middle Rio Grande from Cochiti Dam to the headwaters of Elephant Butte Reservoir in the State of New Mexico in accordance with the plans recommended in the feasibility report for the Middle Rio Grande Bosque, New Mexico, scheduled for completion in December 2008. (c) Local Participation.--In carrying out subsection (b), the Secretary shall consult with, and consider the activities being carried out by-- (1) the Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Act Collaborative Program; and (2) the Bosque Improvement Group of the Middle Rio Grande Bosque Initiative. (d) Cost Sharing.--Any requirement for non-Federal participation in a project carried out in the bosque of Bernalillo County, New Mexico, pursuant to this section shall be limited to the provision of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project. [(d)] (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this section. * * * * * * * CONSOLIDATED APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2008, PUBLIC LAW 110-161 DIVISION C--ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2008 TITLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS, CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL Sec. 115. The Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers is directed to plan, design, and construct a rural health care facility on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation of the Three Affiliated Tribes, North Dakota, at an estimated Federal cost of [$20,000,000. The Secretary shall transfer this facility to the Secretary of the Interior for operation and maintenance upon the completion of construction.] $20,000,000: Provided, That the Secretary shall transfer ownership of this facility to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for operation and maintenance upon the completion of construction. * * * * * * * BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS AMENDED [In millions of dollars] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Budget authority Outlays --------------------------------------------------------- Committee Amount of Committee Amount of allocation\1\ bill allocation\1\ bill ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee allocations to its subcommittees of amounts in the Budget Resolution for 2009: Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development: Mandatory......................................... .............. ........... .............. ........... Discretionary..................................... 33,258 33,258 32,552 \1\32,378 Projections of outlays associated with the recommendation: 2009.............................................. .............. ........... .............. \2\19,392 2010.............................................. .............. ........... .............. 9,071 2011.............................................. .............. ........... .............. 2,967 2012.............................................. .............. ........... .............. 728 2013 and future years............................. .............. ........... .............. 1,124 Financial assistance to State and local governments NA 119 NA 24 for 2009............................................ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority. \2\Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority. NA: Not applicable. DISCLOSURE OF CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS The Constitution vests in the Congress the power of the purse. The Committee believes strongly that Congress should make the decisions on how to allocate the people's money. As defined in Rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the Senate, the term ``congressional directed spending item'' means a provision or report language included primarily at the request of a Senator, providing, authorizing, or recommending a specific amount of discretionary budget authority, credit authority, or other spending authority for a contract, loan, loan guarantee, grant, loan authority, or other expenditure with or to an entity, or targeted to a specific State, locality or congressional district, other than through a statutory or administrative, formula-driven, or competitive award process. For each item, a Member is required to provide a certification that neither the Member nor the Senator's immediate family has a pecuniary interest in such congressionally directed spending item. Such certifications are available to the public on the website of the Senate Committee on Appropriations (www.appropriations.senate.gov/senators.cfm). Following is a list of congressionally directed spending items included in the Senate recommendation discussed in this report, along with the name of each Senator who submitted a request to the Committee of jurisdiction for each item so identified. Neither the Committee recommendation nor this report contains any limited tax benefits or limited tariff benefits as defined in rule XLIV. CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Account Project Funding Member ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GI............................... ABILENE, TX (BRAZOS RIVER BASIN-ELM CREEK)................................................. 150,000 Senator Cornyn GI............................... AGUA FRIA RIVER TRILBY WASH, AZ............................................................ 250,000 Senator Kyl GI............................... AIWW BRIDGE AT DEEP CREEK, VA.............................................................. 500,000 Senators Warner, Webb GI............................... ALA WAI CANAL, OAHU, HI.................................................................... 300,000 The President, Senator Inouye GI............................... AMAZON CREEK, OR........................................................................... 350,000 Senators Wyden, Smith GI............................... AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA...................................... 250,000 Senator Landrieu GI............................... ANACOSTIA RIVER & TRIBUTARIES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MD....................................... 400,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin GI............................... ANCHORAGE HARBOR DEEPENING, AK............................................................. 500,000 The President, Senator Stevens GI............................... AUGUSTA, GA................................................................................ 278,000 The President GI............................... BALTIMORE METRO WTR RES--PATAPSCO AND BACK RIVERS.......................................... 250,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin GI............................... BARROW COASTAL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION, AK.................................................. 400,000 The President GI............................... BASALT, CO................................................................................. 50,000 Senator Salazar GI............................... BAYOU SORREL LOCK, LA...................................................................... 1,599,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter GI............................... BELPRE, OH................................................................................. 150,000 Senator Voinovich, Brown GI............................... BLOOMSBURG, PA............................................................................. 700,000 Senators Specter, Casey GI............................... BOGUE BANKS, NC............................................................................ 132,000 Senator Burr GI............................... BOLINAS LAGOON ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA................................................... 350,000 Senator Boxer GI............................... BOSSIER PARISH, LA......................................................................... 200,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter GI............................... BOSTON HARBOR (45-FOOT CHANNEL), MA........................................................ 2,300,000 The President GI............................... BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, BROWNSVILLE CHANNEL, TX.............................................. 400,000 The President, Senator Cornyn GI............................... BRUSH CREEK BASIN, KS & MO................................................................. 274,000 Senators Brownback, Bond GI............................... BUFFALO RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, NY................................................... 100,000 The President GI............................... CACHE LA POUDRE, CO........................................................................ 130,000 Senator Salazar GI............................... CALCASIEU LOCK, LA......................................................................... 600,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter GI............................... CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA............................................................... 162,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter GI............................... CALCASIEU RIVER BASIN, LA.................................................................. 67,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter GI............................... CALIFORNIA COASTAL SEDIMENT MASTER PLAN, CA................................................ 900,000 The President GI............................... CARPINTERIA SHORELINE STUDY................................................................ 443,000 Senator Feinstein GI............................... CEDAR RIVER (TIME CHECK AREA), CEDAR RAPIDS, IA............................................ 300,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley GI............................... CENTRALIA, WA.............................................................................. 1,200,000 Senator Murray GI............................... CHATFIELD, CHERRY CREEK AND BEAR CREEK RESERVOIRS, CO...................................... 200,000 Senators Allard, Salazar GI............................... CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN, WA................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Murray GI............................... CHERRY RIVER BASIN, WV..................................................................... 150,000 Senator Byrd GI............................... CHESAPEAKE BAY MARSHLANDS, MD.............................................................. 1,000,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin GI............................... CHESAPEAKE BAY SHORELINE, MARYLAND COASTAL MANAGEMENT...................................... 200,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin GI............................... CHESAPEAKE BAY SUSQUEHANNA RESERVOIR SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT, PA, MD, VA....................... 200,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin GI............................... CLINCH RIVER WATERSHED, VA................................................................. 150,000 Senators Warner, Webb GI............................... CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN WATERSHED STUDY CT, MA, NH AN...................................... 450,000 Senators Gregg, Dodd, Lieberman GI............................... COYOTE & BERRYESSA CREEKS, CA.............................................................. 950,000 The President GI............................... COYOTE DAM, CA............................................................................. 250,000 Senator Feinstein GI............................... CROSS LAKE, LA WATER SUPPLY IMPROVEMENTS................................................... 250,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter GI............................... CURRITUCK SOUND, NC........................................................................ 150,000 The President GI............................... CUYAHOGA RIVER BULKHEAD STUDY, OH.......................................................... 126,000 Senator Voinovich GI............................... DALLAS FLOODWAY, UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX............................................. 1,000,000 The President, Senator Hutchison GI............................... DELAWARE RIVER COMPREHENSIVE, NJ........................................................... 290,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... DELAWARE RIVER DREDGED MATERIAL UTILIZATION, PA, DE, & NJ.................................. 125,000 Senator Specter GI............................... DES PLAINES RIVER, IL (PHASE II)........................................................... 500,000 The President, Senator Durbin GI............................... DISMAL SWAMP AND DISMAL SWAMP CANAL, VA.................................................... 262,000 Senators Warner, Webb GI............................... EASTERN SHORE, MID CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND, MD............................................... 983,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin GI............................... EDISTO ISLAND, SC.......................................................................... 218,000 The President GI............................... ELIZABETH RIVER, HAMPTON ROADS, VA......................................................... 97,000 The President GI............................... ELLIOTT BAY SEAWALL........................................................................ 750,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell GI............................... ESPANOLA VALLEY RIO GRANDE AND TRIBS, NM................................................... 400,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman GI............................... FLAGLER BEACH, FL.......................................................................... 250,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez GI............................... FORGE RIVER WATERSHED, LONG ISLAND, NY..................................................... 125,000 Senator Schumer GI............................... FOUR MILE RUN, VA.......................................................................... 300,000 Senators Warner, Webb GI............................... FREEPORT HARBOR, TX........................................................................ 400,000 The President GI............................... GIWW, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER.......................................................... 150,000 The President GI............................... GIWW, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER REALIGNMENT, TX.......................................... 200,000 The President GI............................... GIWW, PORT O'CONNER TO CORPUS CHRISTI BAY, TX.............................................. 350,000 The President GI............................... GOLETA BEACH, CA........................................................................... 150,000 Senator Feinstein GI............................... GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN WATERSHED, OK, MO, KS & AR...................................... 60,000 Senators Brownback, Roberts GI............................... GRAND LAKE COMPREHENSIVE, OK............................................................... 250,000 Senator Inhofe GI............................... GREAT LAKES NAV SYST STUDY, MI, IL, IN, MN, NY, OH, PA..................................... 200,000 The President GI............................... GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS, MI...................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow, Coleman, Schumer, Clinton, Voinovich, Brown, Kohl GI............................... GUADALUPE AND SAN ANTONIO RIVER BASINS, TX................................................. 223,000 The President GI............................... HAGATNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL................................................................ 350,000 The President GI............................... HAMILTON CITY, CA.......................................................................... 500,000 Senator Feinstein GI............................... HASHAMOMUCK COVE, SOUTHOLD, NY............................................................. 125,000 Senator Schumer GI............................... HEACOCK AND CACTUS CHANNELS, CA............................................................ 500,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer GI............................... HILO HARBOR MODIFICATIONS, HI.............................................................. 100,000 Senator Inouye GI............................... HOCKING RIVER BASIN, MONDAY CREEK, OH...................................................... 300,000 Senator Voinovich GI............................... HOMER HARBOR MODIFICATION, AK.............................................................. 400,000 Senator Stevens GI............................... HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ........................................ 204,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, LOWER PASSAIC RIVER, NJ........................................... 500,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, NY & NJ........................................................... 200,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez, Schumer GI............................... HUMBOLT BAY LONG TERM SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT, CA.............................................. 200,000 Senator Feinstein GI............................... HUMBOLT, IA................................................................................ 152,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley GI............................... HYDROELECTRIC POWER ASSESSMENT, HI......................................................... 300,000 Senators Inouye, Akaka GI............................... ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION, IL....................................................... 400,000 The President GI............................... INDIANA HARBOR, IN......................................................................... 300,000 The President GI............................... INTERBASIN CONTROL OF GREAT LAKES-MISSISSIPPI RIVER AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES, IL, IN, OH, 300,000 Senator Durbin WI. GI............................... JAMES RIVER, SD & ND....................................................................... 350,000 Senators Johnson, Thune GI............................... JOHN H KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & NC..................................................... 300,000 The President GI............................... KAHUKU, HI................................................................................. 344,000 Senator Inouye GI............................... KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS...................................................................... 315,000 The President, Senators Bond, Roberts GI............................... KALAELOA BARBERS POINT HARBOR MODIFICATION, HI............................................. 350,000 Senator Inouye GI............................... KEITH CREEK, ROCKFORD, IL.................................................................. 548,000 Senator Durbin GI............................... KENAI RIVER BLUFF EROSION, AK.............................................................. 500,000 Senator Stevens GI............................... LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY.................................................................... 250,000 Senator Schumer GI............................... LAKE WORTH INLET, FL....................................................................... 200,000 Senator Bill Nelson GI............................... LANSING, GRAND RIVER WATERFRONT RESTORATION, MI............................................ 50,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow GI............................... LITTLE COLORADO RIVER WATERSHED, AZ........................................................ 250,000 Senator Kyl GI............................... LITTLE KANAWHA RIVER, WV................................................................... 300,000 Senator Byrd GI............................... LONG ISLAND, MARSH AND JOHNS CREEKS, GA.................................................... 150,000 The President GI............................... LOS ANGELES RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA................................................ 590,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer GI............................... LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA........................................... 10,000,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter GI............................... LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA (SCIENCE PROGRAM)......................... ................. The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter GI............................... LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY, WOODLAND AND VICINITY...................................... 200,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer GI............................... LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN, TX............................................................. 425,000 The President, Senators Hutchison, Cornyn GI............................... LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION OR & WA......................................... 100,000 The President GI............................... LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA.................................................................... 400,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer GI............................... LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESOURCE STUDY, AR................................................. 254,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor GI............................... LOWER PLATTE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NE..................................................... 177,000 Seators Ben Nelson, Hagel GI............................... LOWER POTOMAC ESTUARY WATERSHED, ST MARY'S WATERSHED....................................... 150,000 Senator Cardin GI............................... LOWER PUYALLUP RIVER ALTERNATIVES STUDY, WA................................................ 57,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell GI............................... LOWER SADDLE RIVER, BERGEN COUNTY, NJ...................................................... 375,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... LYNNHAVEN RIVER BASIN, VA.................................................................. 175,000 The President GI............................... MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HI................................................................... 200,000 The President, Senator Inouye GI............................... MAHONING RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OH.................................................. 500,000 Senator Voinovich GI............................... MALIBU CREEK WATERSHED, CA................................................................. 150,000 Senator Feinstein GI............................... MANHATTAN, KS.............................................................................. 300,000 Senators Brownback, Roberts GI............................... MARSH LAKE, MN (MN RIVER AUTHORITY)........................................................ 227,000 Senators Coleman, Klobuchar GI............................... MATANUSKA RIVER WATERSHED, AK.............................................................. 400,000 Senator Stevens GI............................... MATILIJA DAM, CA........................................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer GI............................... MAY BRANCH, FORT SMITH, AR................................................................. 250,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor GI............................... MERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, NH & MA................................................... 200,000 The President, Senators Kennedy, Kerry GI............................... MIDDLE CREEK, CA........................................................................... 500,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer GI............................... MIDDLE POTOMAC RIVER WATERSHED, MD, VA, PA, WV, DC......................................... 175,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin GI............................... MIDDLE POTOMAC RIVER--GREATER SENECA/MUDDY BRANCH, MD...................................... 300,000 Senator Cardin GI............................... MILE POINT, FL............................................................................. 50,000 The President GI............................... MILL CREEK WATERSHED, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN.................................................. 100,000 The President GI............................... MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED, UMR LAKE ITASCA TO L&D.......................................... 350,000 Senators Coleman, Klobuchar GI............................... MINNESOTA RIVER BASIN, MN & SD............................................................. 350,000 Senator Coleman GI............................... MISSOURI RIVER DEGRADATION STUDY, KS....................................................... 588,000 The President, Senators Bond, Brownback, Roberts GI............................... MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, UNITS L455 & R460-471, MO..................................... 300,000 Senator Bond GI............................... MISSOURI RIVER, ND, MT, SD, NE, IA, KS, MO................................................. 3,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Johnson, Baucus, Tester, Conrad, Thune GI............................... MONTAUK POINT, NY.......................................................................... 375,000 Senator Schumer GI............................... MONTPELIER, VT............................................................................. 750,000 Senator Leahy GI............................... NEUSE RIVER BASIN, NC...................................................................... 200,000 The President GI............................... NEW JERSEY SHORE PROTECTION, HEREFORD TO CAPE MAY INLET.................................... 154,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... NEW JERSEY SHORELINE ALTERNATIVE LONG-TERM NOURISHMENT..................................... 150,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... NEW RIVER, CLAYTOR LAKE, VA................................................................ 150,000 Senators Warner, Webb GI............................... NORTH CAROLINA INTERNATIONAL PORT, NC...................................................... 100,000 Senators Dole, Burr GI............................... NORTH SHORE OF LONG ISLAND, ASHAROKEN, NY.................................................. 150,000 Senator Schumer GI............................... NORTH SHORE OF LONG ISLAND, BAYVILLE, NY................................................... 175,000 Senator Schumer GI............................... NUECES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX........................................................... 650,000 The President, Senator Hutchison GI............................... OHIO RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE STUDY, WV, KY, OH, PA....................................... 600,000 Senators Byrd, Voinovich GI............................... PAJARO RIVER, CA........................................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer GI............................... PASSAIC RIVER MAIN STEM, NJ................................................................ 250,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... PASSAIC RIVER, HARRISON, NJ................................................................ 297,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... PEARL RIVER WATERSHED, MS.................................................................. 250,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker GI............................... PECKMAN RIVER BASIN AND TRIBUTARIES, NJ.................................................... 375,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... PEORIA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, IL.......................................................... 50,000 Senator Durbin GI............................... PILGRIM LAKE, MA........................................................................... 96,000 The President GI............................... PINE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR..................................................................... 500,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor GI............................... PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL................................................................. 550,000 The President, Senator Martinez GI............................... PORT OF IBERIA, LA......................................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter GI............................... PORTSMOUTH HARBOR & PISCATAQUA RIVER, NH & ME.............................................. 82,000 Senator Gregg GI............................... PRAIRIE DUPONT LEVEE, IL................................................................... 200,000 Senator Durbin GI............................... PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE MARINE HABITAT RESTORATION, WA....................................... 1,500,000 The President, Senators Murray, Cantwell GI............................... RAHWAY RIVER BASIN, NJ..................................................................... 300,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, HIGHLANDS, NJ.............................................. 300,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, LEONARDO, NJ............................................... 100,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, UNION BEACH, NJ............................................ 100,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... RAYMONDVILLE DRAIN, TX..................................................................... 350,000 Senators Hutchison, Cornyn GI............................... RED CLAY CREEK, CHRISTINA RIVER WATERSHED, DE.............................................. 300,000 Senators Biden, Carper GI............................... RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, MN, ND, SD & MANITOBA, CA.................................... 500,000 Senator Dorgan, Coleman GI............................... REDWOOD CITY HARBOR, CA.................................................................... 300,000 Senator Boxer GI............................... RILLITO RIVER, PIMA COUNTY, AZ............................................................. 275,000 The President GI............................... RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM, CO & TX.............................................................. 500,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman GI............................... RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX....................................................................... 100,000 The President GI............................... RIVER DES PERES, MO........................................................................ 150,000 Senator Bond GI............................... RIVERSIDE COUNTY SAMP, CA.................................................................. 200,000 Senator Feinstein GI............................... ROCK CREEK, KEEFER SLOUGH, CA.............................................................. 200,000 Senator Feinstein GI............................... SABINE PASS TO GALVESTON BAY, TX........................................................... 400,000 Senator Cornyn GI............................... SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX................................................................. 500,000 Senator Hutchison GI............................... SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASINS COMPREHENSIVE STUDY, CA................................ 1,000,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer GI............................... SAC-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA ISLANDS AND LEVEES, CA............................................... 2,000,000 The President, Senator Feinstein GI............................... SAN DIEGO COUNTY SAMP, CA.................................................................. 250,000 Senator Feinstein GI............................... SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHORELINE, CA............................................................. 200,000 Senator Boxer GI............................... SAN JOAQUIN RB, WEST STANISLAUS COUNTY, ORESTIMBA CREE..................................... 400,000 Senator Feinstein GI............................... SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN (SJRB), FRAZIER CREEK/STRATHMO..................................... 200,000 Senator Feinstein GI............................... SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN (SJRB), LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER.................................... 600,000 Senator Feinstein GI............................... SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN (SJRB), WHITE RIVER/DRY CREEK...................................... 125,000 Senator Feinstein GI............................... SAN PABLO BAY WATERSHED, CA................................................................ 250,000 Senator Boxer GI............................... SANTA FE, NM............................................................................... 28,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman GI............................... SARASOTA, LIDO KEY, FL..................................................................... 158,000 Senator Bill Nelson GI............................... SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA.............................................................. 700,000 The President, Senator Chambliss GI............................... SAW MILL RIVER AT ELMSFORD/GREENBURGH, NY.................................................. 250,000 Senator Schumer GI............................... SEARSPORT HARBOR, ME....................................................................... 157,000 Senators Snowe, Collins GI............................... SHREWSBURY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NJ....................................................... 250,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... SKAGIT RIVER, WA........................................................................... 505,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell GI............................... SKOKOMISH RIVER BASIN, WA.................................................................. 375,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell GI............................... SOLANA-ENCINITAS SHORELINE, CA............................................................. 171,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer GI............................... SOUTH BOULDER CREEK, CO.................................................................... 252,000 Senators Allard, Salazar GI............................... SOUTH FORK OF SOUTH BRANCH OF CHICAGO RIVER................................................ 400,000 Senator Durbin GI............................... SOUTH RIVER, RARITAN RIVER BASIN, NJ....................................................... 375,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SHORELINE, CA.......................................................... 1,400,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer GI............................... SOUTH SHORE OF STATEN ISLAND, NY........................................................... 200,000 Senator Schumer GI............................... SOUTHEAST OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCE STUDY, OK................................................ 500,000 Senator Inhofe GI............................... SOUTHWEST COASTAL HURRICANE PROTECTION, LA................................................. 1,500,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter GI............................... SOUTHWEST, ARKANSAS, AR.................................................................... 327,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor GI............................... SPARKS ARROYO COLONIA, EL PASO COUNTY, TX.................................................. 150,000 Senators Hutchison, Cornyn GI............................... ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL....................................................................... 250,000 Senator Bill Nelson GI............................... ST. CHARLES PARISH URBAN FLOOD CONTROL, LA................................................. 500,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter GI............................... ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR MANAGEMENT PLAN, MI..................................... 200,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow GI............................... ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST URBAN FLOOD CONTROL, LA............................................... 250,000 Senator Landrieu GI............................... STONY BROOK, MILLSTONE RIVER BASIN, NJ..................................................... 250,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... SURF CITY AND NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, NC...................................................... 386,000 Senators Dole, Burr GI............................... SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN LOW FLOW MANAGEMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION STUDY, MD, PA, & 300,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin NY. GI............................... SUTTER COUNTY (Northern California Streams), CA............................................ 339,000 The President, Senator Feinstein GI............................... TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING, CA AND NV......................................................... 125,000 Senators Reid, Feinstein, Ensign GI............................... TEN MILE RIVER, NY AND CT.................................................................. 125,000 Senator Schumer GI............................... TOPEKA, KS................................................................................. 100,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts GI............................... TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV........................................................................ 5,000,000 Senators Reid, Ensign GI............................... TYBEE ISLAND CHANNEL, GA................................................................... 250,000 The President, Senator Chambliss, Isakson GI............................... UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, NY......................................................... 300,000 Senator Schumer GI............................... UPPER MISS RIVER--ILLINOIS WW SYSTEM, IL, IA, MN, MO....................................... 10,000,000 Senators Harkin, Bond, Grassley, Coleman, Klobuchar GI............................... UPPER MISS RVR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IL, IA, MO, MN & WI..................................... 220,000 Senators Durbin, Harkin, Bond, Grassley GI............................... UPPER OHIO NAVIGATION STUDY, PA............................................................ 4,200,000 Senators Byrd, Specter, Casey GI............................... UPPER PENITENCIA CREEK, CA................................................................. 191,000 The President GI............................... UPPER RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER, VA (PHASE II).................................................... 200,000 Senators Warner, Webb GI............................... UPPER TURKEY CREEK, KS..................................................................... 150,000 Senator Brownback GI............................... VA SHLY-AY AKIMEL SALT RIVER RESTORATION, AZ............................................... 658,000 The President GI............................... VALDEZ HARBOR EXPANSION, AK................................................................ 150,000 Senators Stevens, Murkowski GI............................... VICINITY AND WILOUGHBY SPIT, VA............................................................ 200,000 Senators Warner, Webb GI............................... WAILUPE STREAM, OAHU, HI................................................................... 300,000 Senator Inouye GI............................... WALLA WALLA RIVER WATERSHED, OR & WA....................................................... 500,000 Senators Murray, Wyden, Smith, Cantwell GI............................... WALTON COUNTY, FL.......................................................................... 591,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez GI............................... WASHITA RIVER BASIN, OK.................................................................... 250,000 Senator Inhofe GI............................... WATERTOWN, SD.............................................................................. 450,000 Senators Johnson, Thune GI............................... WAUWATOSA, WI.............................................................................. 200,000 Senator Kohl GI............................... WEST SHORE, LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA......................................................... 900,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter GI............................... WESTCHESTER COUNTY STREAMS, NY............................................................. 175,000 Senator Schumer GI............................... WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, BLANCHARD RIVER WATERSHED, OH, IN, & MI........................... 250,000 Senator Voinovich GI............................... WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OH, IN, & MI...................................................... 250,000 Senator Voinovich GI............................... WHITE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, AR & MO................................................... 500,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor GI............................... WHITE RIVER NAVIGATION TO BATESVILLE, AR................................................... 325,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor GI............................... WILD RICE RIVER, RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, MN.......................................... 271,000 The President, Senator Coleman GI............................... WILLAMETTE RIVER FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION, OR................................................ 240,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith GI............................... YAKUTAT HARBOR, AK......................................................................... 700,000 The President GI............................... YELLOWSTONE RIVER CORRIDOR, MT............................................................. 500,000 The President, Senators Baucus, Tester GI............................... ACTIONS FOR CHANGE TO IMPROVE INVESTIGATIONS............................................... ................. The President GI............................... COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION.............................................................. 5,600,000 The President GI............................... Coastal Data Information Program....................................................... (1,000,000) Senators Feinstein, Cantwell GI............................... Pacific Island Land Ocean Typhoon Experiment, HI....................................... (1,000,000) Senator Inouye GI............................... Surge and Wave Island Modeling Studies, HI............................................. (1,200,000) Senator Inouye GI............................... Wave Data Study........................................................................ (1,000,000) Senators Biden, Carper GI............................... COMMITTEE ON MARINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS................................................. 100,000 The President GI............................... ENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIES................................................................. 75,000 The President GI............................... FEME/MAP MOD COORDINATION.................................................................. 1,500,000 The President GI............................... FLOOD DAMAGE DATA PROGRAM.................................................................. 220,000 The President GI............................... FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES............................................................ 11,000,000 The President GI............................... City of Gretna, LA (GIS)............................................................... (254,000) Senator Landrieu GI............................... East Baton Rouge Parish, LA (GIS)...................................................... (400,000) Senators Landrieu, Vitter GI............................... Hurricane Evacuation Studies, Hawaii................................................... (1,000,000) Senator Inouye GI............................... Iowa Multi-State Dam Safety Analyses, Iowa............................................. (37,000) Senator Grassley GI............................... Kekaha Flood Study, HI................................................................. (100,000) Senators Inouye, Akaka GI............................... Little Sioux Watershed, IA............................................................. (30,000) Senator Grassley GI............................... Livingston Parish, LA (GIS)............................................................ (735,000) Senators Landrieu, Vitter GI............................... Mon-Maq Dam Removal Study & Local Floodplain Master Planning, Monticello, IA........... (100,000) Senator Grassley GI............................... Papillion Creek Watershed, Flood Plain Mapping, Nebraska............................... (500,000) Senators Ben Nelson, Hagel GI............................... Southeastern, PA....................................................................... (300,000) Senators Specter, Casey GI............................... HYDROLOGIC STUDIES......................................................................... 250,000 The President GI............................... INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW.................................................................... 1,000,000 The President GI............................... INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES................................................................ 200,000 The President GI............................... NATIONAL SHORELINE STUDY................................................................... 375,000 The President GI............................... OTHER COORDINATION PROGRAMS................................................................ 4,580,000 The President GI............................... Lake Tahoe Coordination................................................................ (500,000) Senators Reid, Feinstein, Ensign GI............................... PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES.............................................................. 8,750,000 The President GI............................... Asheville, NC.......................................................................... (50,000) Senator Dole GI............................... Assessment of Bridges and Impacts on Flows and Flooding, Delaware County, NY........... (150,000) Senator Schumer GI............................... Bacon Creek, Sioux City, IA............................................................ (50,000) Senator Grassley GI............................... Boyer River, Missouri Valley, IA....................................................... (13,000) Senator Grassley GI............................... Choctaw County Reservoir, MS........................................................... (100,000) Senator Wicker GI............................... Delaware Estuary Salinity Monitoring Study, Delaware & New Jersey...................... (200,000) Senator Lautenberg, Menendez GI............................... Fife Lake Aquatic Weed Control, MI..................................................... (300,000) Senator Levin, Stabenow GI............................... Jones County Water Supply, MS.......................................................... (50,000) Senator Wicker GI............................... Kansas River Basin Technical Assistance, Kansas........................................ (400,000) Senator Brownback GI............................... Little Sioux Watershed, IA............................................................. (30,000) Senator Grassley GI............................... Mississippi Band of Choctaws, MS....................................................... (50,000) Senator Wicker GI............................... PLANNING SUPPORT PROGRAM................................................................... 3,100,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Schumer GI............................... PRECIPITATION STUDIES (NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE)........................................... 225,000 The President GI............................... REMOTE SENSING/GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORT..................................... 150,000 The President GI............................... RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT................................................................... 28,000,000 The President, Senator Cochran GI............................... Submerged Aquatic Vegetation, Maryland................................................. (1,000,000) Senator Cardin GI............................... SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTERS............................................... 50,000 The President GI............................... STREAM GAGING (U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY)..................................................... 600,000 The President GI............................... TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM...................................................................... 350,000 The President GI............................... TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM................................................................. 1,000,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman GI............................... TRI-SERVICE CADD/GIS TECHNOLOGY CENTER..................................................... 350,000 The President GI............................... WATER RESOURCES PRIORITIES STUDY........................................................... ................. The President CG............................... ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM............................................................. 2,400,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman CG............................... AKUTAN HARBOR, AK.......................................................................... 3,000,000 Senator Stevens CG............................... ALAMOGORDO, NM............................................................................. 4,200,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman CG............................... ALASKA COASTAL EROSION, AK................................................................. 4,500,000 Senators Stevens, Murkowski CG............................... AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (COMMON FEATURES), CA............................................. 13,000,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM MODIFICATIONS), CA.................................... 9,000,000 The President, Senator Feinstein CG............................... AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM RAISE), CA............................................ 2,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES (PHASE I), MD & DC......................................... 30,000 Senator Cardin CG............................... ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NE................................................................ 4,828,000 The President, Senators Ben Nelson, Hagel CG............................... ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MD 1.................................................................... 1,900,000 The President, Senators Mikulski, Cardin CG............................... ATLANTA (EI), GA........................................................................... 2,000,000 Senators Chambliss, Isakson CG............................... ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY....................................... 100,000 Senator Schumer CG............................... ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND, MD............................................................. 200,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin CG............................... ATLANTIC COAST OF NYC, EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY & JAMAICA BAY, NY................... 750,000 Senator Schumer CG............................... ATLANTIC COAST OF NYC, ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT, NY.................................. 3,800,000 Senator Schumer CG............................... BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN WATER RESOURCES, GWYNNS FALLS, MD................................... 500,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin CG............................... BARNEGAT INLET TO LITTLE EGG HARBOR (NJ SHORE PROTECTION), NJ.............................. 11,700,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez CG............................... BIG SIOUX RIVER, SIOUX FALLS, SD........................................................... 4,000,000 Senators Johnson, Thune CG............................... BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO.......................................................... 2,000,000 Senator Bond CG............................... BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO........................................................ 1,700,000 The President, Senator Bond CG............................... BLUESTONE LAKE (DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE), WV.................................................. 12,000,000 The President, Senator Byrd CG............................... BRAYS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX................................................................... 5,382,000 The President, Senator Cornyn CG............................... BRECKENRIDGE, MN........................................................................... 2,877,000 Senators Dorgan, Coleman, Klobuchar CG............................... BREVARD COUNTY (MID REACH), FL............................................................. 500,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez CG............................... BRIDGEPORT ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, CT................................................ 500,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman CG............................... BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET (ABSECON), NJ................................... 3,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez CG............................... BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET, BRIGANTINE, NJ................................. 80,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez CG............................... BRUNSWICK COUNTY BEACHES, NC (Ocean Isle).................................................. 250,000 Senators Dole, Burr CG............................... BURLINGTON HARBOR, VT...................................................................... 500,000 Senator Leahy CG............................... CALFED LEVEE STABILITY PROGRAM............................................................. 5,000,000 Senator Feinstein CG............................... CANTON LAKE (DAM SAFETY), OK............................................................... 21,200,000 The President CG............................... CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ 1..................................................... 2,500,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez CG............................... CEDAR HAMMOCK, WARES CREEK, FL............................................................. 2,773,000 The President, Senator, Martinez CG............................... CENTER HILL DAM (SEEPAGE CONTROL), TN...................................................... 53,400,000 The President, Alexander, Corker CG............................... CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL........................................................... 95,188,000 The President, Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez CG............................... CENTRAL CITY, FORT WORTH, UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX.................................... 500,000 Senators Hutchison, Cornyn CG............................... CENTRAL NEW MEXICO, NM..................................................................... 5,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman CG............................... CHAIN OF ROCKS CANAL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER (DEF CORR), IL..................................... 2,500,000 The President, Senator Durbin CG............................... CHARLESTOWN, MD............................................................................ 50,000 Senator Mikulski CG............................... CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION, MD, VA & PA....................... 2,500,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin, Warner, Webb CG............................... CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD & VA.................................................... 2,000,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin, Warner, Webb CG............................... CHESTERFIELD, MO........................................................................... 3,000,000 Senator Bond CG............................... CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX, SD.......................................... 4,000,000 Senators Johnson, Thune CG............................... CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL..................................... 5,750,000 The President, Senators Durbin, Levin, Stabenow, Coleman, Voinovich, Brown, Kohl CG............................... CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, SECOND BARRIER, IL........................................ 500,000 The President, Senators Durbin, Levin, Stabenow, Coleman, Voinovich, Brown, Kohl CG............................... CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL...................................................................... 4,000,000 The President, Senator Durbin CG............................... CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN...................................................... 42,000,000 The President, Alexander, Corker CG............................... CHIEF JOSEPH DAM GAS ABATEMENT, WA 1....................................................... 2,500,000 The President, Senator Murray CG............................... CLEARWATER LAKE (SEEPAGE CONTROL), MO...................................................... 25,000,000 The President CG............................... COLUMBIA RIVER CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, OR & WA............................................... 36,000,000 The President, Senators Murray, Crapo, Wyden, Smith, Cantwell CG............................... COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, WA, OR & ID 1.............................................. 92,000,000 The President, Senator Murray CG............................... COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA........................................ 2,455,000 The President, Senators Murray, Wyden, Smith, Cantwell CG............................... COMITE RIVER, LA........................................................................... 10,000,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter CG............................... CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX............................................................ 2,000,000 Senators Hutchison, Cornyn CG............................... CROOKSTON, MN.............................................................................. 300,000 The President, Senator Klobuchar CG............................... CUMBERLAND, MD............................................................................. 200,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin CG............................... DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX....................................... 13,000,000 Senators Hutchison, Cornyn CG............................... DAVENPORT, IA.............................................................................. 4,850,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley CG............................... DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, ROOSEVELT INLET TO LEWES BEACH, DE 1............................... 350,000 The President CG............................... DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE.............................................................. 390,000 Senators Biden, Carper CG............................... DELAWARE RIVER MAIN CHANNEL DEEPENING, NJ, PA & DE......................................... 5,000,000 Senators Specter, Casey CG............................... DES MOINES AND RACCOON RIVERS, IA.......................................................... 5,000,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley CG............................... DES MOINES RECREATION RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA.............................................. 3,900,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley CG............................... DES PLAINES RIVER, IL...................................................................... 8,000,000 The President, Senator Durbin CG............................... DESOTO COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM, MS............................................... 4,860,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker CG............................... DUWAMISH AND GREEN RIVER BASIN, WA......................................................... 3,000,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell CG............................... EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LA (FC)........................................................... 2,000,000 Senator Landrieu CG............................... EAST ST LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL............................................................. 375,000 Senator Durbin CG............................... EAST ST LOUIS, IL.......................................................................... 1,207,000 The President, Senator Durbin CG............................... ELK CREEK LAKE, OR......................................................................... 3,120,000 The President CG............................... EMSWORTH L&D, OHIO RIVER (STATIC INSTABILITY CORRECTION), PA............................... 25,800,000 The President, Senators Specter, Casey CG............................... EVERGLADES AND S. FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FL........................................ 3,797,000 The President, Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez CG............................... FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, NY....................................................... 500,000 The President CG............................... FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY..................................................... 2,150,000 Senator Schumer CG............................... FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS, FL................................................ 2,200,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez CG............................... FOLLY BEACH, SC 1.......................................................................... 35,000 The President CG............................... FT. PECK CABIN CONVEYANCE, MT.............................................................. 1,500,000 Senators Baucus, Tester CG............................... GARRISON DAM AND POWER PLANT (REPLACEMENT), ND............................................. 3,500,000 The President CG............................... GENESEE COUNTY, MI......................................................................... 600,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow CG............................... GRAYS LANDING LOCK AND DAM, MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA.......................................... 600,000 The President CG............................... GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET TO PECK BEACH (OCEAN CITY), NJ...................................... 3,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez CG............................... GREAT EGG HARBOR TO TOWNSENDS INLET, NJ.................................................... 250,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez CG............................... GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, MI.......................................... 2,500,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow, Coleman, Voinovich CG............................... GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WV................................................................. 1,500,000 Senator Byrd CG............................... GUADALUPE RIVER, CA........................................................................ 5,000,000 Senator Feinstein CG............................... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ................................................................. 100,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez CG............................... HAINES BOAT HARBOR, AK..................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Stevens CG............................... HAMILTON AIRFIELD WETLANDS RESTORATION, CA................................................. 4,900,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... HARBOR/SOUTH BAY WATER RECYCLING STUDY, LOS ANGELES, CA.................................... 3,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... HERBERT HOOVER DIKE (SEEPAGE CONTROL) , FL................................................. 77,400,000 The President, Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez CG............................... HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX................................................................... 500,000 The President, Senator Cornyn CG............................... HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX.................................................. 19,700,000 The President, Senator Hutchison CG............................... HOWARD HANSON DAM ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, WA 1.............................................. 15,000,000 The President, Senator Murray CG............................... IAO STREAMS, HI............................................................................ 500,000 Senators Inouye, Akaka CG............................... ILLINOIS WATERWAY, LOCKPORT LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), IL................................. 28,600,000 The President CG............................... INDIANA HARBOR (CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY), IN 1.......................................... 8,385,000 The President CG............................... INNER HARBOR NAVIGATION CANAL LOCK REPLACEMENT, LA......................................... 2,000,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter CG............................... ISLAND CREEK BASIN IN AND AROUND LOGAN, WV................................................. 200,000 Senator Byrd CG............................... J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA........................................................... 8,500,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter CG............................... JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL.................................................................... 3,500,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez CG............................... JAMES RIVER DEEPWATER TURNING BASIN, VA.................................................... 1,763,000 Senator Warner, Webb CG............................... JOHN H KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR (REPLACEMENT), VA & NC....................................... 14,000,000 The President CG............................... JOHNSON CREEK, UPPER TRINITY BASIN, ARLINGTON, TX.......................................... 2,000,000 Senators Hutchison, Cornyn CG............................... JOSEPH G MINISH HISTORIC WATERFRONT PARK, NJ............................................... 4,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez CG............................... KAWEAH RIVER, CA........................................................................... 1,000,000 The President CG............................... KENTUCKY LOCK AND DAM, TENNESSEE RIVER, KY................................................. 22,330,000 The President, Senator McConnell CG............................... KISSIMMEE RIVER, FL........................................................................ 31,015,000 The President, Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez CG............................... LACKAWANNA RIVER, SCRANTON, PA............................................................. 4,782,000 Senators Specter, Casey CG............................... LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED INITIATE, VT...................................................... 2,000,000 Senator Leahy CG............................... LAKE SAKAKAWEA PROJECT, ND................................................................. 17,048,000 Senator Dorgan CG............................... LAKE WORTH SAND TRANSFER PLANT, FL 1....................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Bill Nelson CG............................... LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (CG)........................................................... 2,500,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter CG............................... LEVISA AND TUG FORKS AND UPPER CUMBERLAND RIVER, WV, VA & KY............................... 16,500,000 Senators Byrd, Warner, Webb CG............................... LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN................................................................... 8,000,000 The President CG............................... LLAGAS CREEK, CA........................................................................... 400,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... LOCK & DAM 27, MISSISSIPPI RIVER (REHABILITATION), IL 1.................................... 2,598,000 The President, Senators Durbin, Bond CG............................... LOCK AND DAM 11, MISSISSIPPI RIVER (MAJOR REHAB), IA 1..................................... 2,750,000 The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley CG............................... LOCK AND DAM 3, MISSISSIPPI RIVER (MAJOR REHAB) , MN....................................... 2,000,000 Senator Coleman CG............................... LOCKS AND DAMS 2, 3, AND 4, MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA.......................................... 19,050,000 The President, Senators Specter, Casey CG............................... LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA....................................................... 5,700,000 The President CG............................... LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, NJ 1............................................... 150,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez CG............................... LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, OR & WA........................................ 1,500,000 The President, Senator Murray CG............................... LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, WA.......................................................... ................. The President, Senator Murray CG............................... LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WV................................................................ 1,050,000 Senator Byrd CG............................... LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE COMPENSATION, WA, OR 1................................... 1,500,000 The President CG............................... LYNCHBURG CSO, VA.......................................................................... 300,000 Senator Warner, Webb CG............................... MARKLAND LOCKS & DAM, KY & IL 1............................................................ 10,600,000 The President CG............................... MARMET LOCK, KANAWHA RIVER, WV............................................................. 9,000,000 The President, Senator Byrd CG............................... MCALPINE LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, KY & IN................................................ 6,270,000 The President, Senator McConnell CG............................... MCCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL......................................................... 34,000,000 The President, Senator Durbin CG............................... METROPOLITAN REGION OF CINCINNATI, DUCK CREEK, OH.......................................... 4,000,000 The President, Senator Brown CG............................... MIAMI HARBOR CHANNEL DEEPENING, FL......................................................... 500,000 Senator Martinez CG............................... MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM................................ 800,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman CG............................... MIDDLE RIO GRANDE RESTORATION, NM.......................................................... 24,016,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman CG............................... MID-VALLEY AREA LEVEE RECONSTRUCTION, CA................................................... 1,500,000 Senator Feinstein CG............................... MILWAUKEE HARBOR CDF EXPANSION, WI......................................................... 1,600,000 Senator Kohl CG............................... MISS RIVER BTWN THE OHIO AND MO RIVERS (REG WORKS), MO..................................... 5,011,000 The President, Senator Bond CG............................... MISSISSIPPI ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, MS............................................... 18,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker CG............................... MISSOURI & MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT, MO....................................... 1,500,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley, Hagel CG............................... MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE & SD.............................................. 1,000,000 Senator Hagel CG............................... MISSOURI R FISH AND WILDLIFE RECOVERY, IA,KS,MO,MT,NE & ND 1............................... 70,000,000 The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley, Baucus, Tester CG............................... MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (L-385), MO, IA, NE & KS....................................... 2,600,000 Senator Bond CG............................... MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, ND............................................................. 1,000,000 Senator Conrad CG............................... MOBILE HARBOR TURNING BASIN, AL............................................................ 3,400,000 Senators Shelby, Sessions CG............................... MT ST HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA.......................................................... 4,410,000 The President, Senator Murray CG............................... MUD MOUNTAIN DAM (FISH PASSAGE), WA........................................................ 1,000,000 The President, Senator Murray CG............................... MUDDY RIVER, MA............................................................................ 5,000,000 The President, Senators Kennedy, Kerry CG............................... MURRIETA CREEK, CA......................................................................... 5,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... NAPA RIVER, CA............................................................................. 11,000,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... NEGAUNEE, MI............................................................................... 500,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow CG............................... NEW MEXICO (Environmental Infrastructure), NM.............................................. 7,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman CG............................... NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY & NJ.................................................... 85,000,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez, Schumer CG............................... NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED, NY................................................................ 1,000,000 Senator Schumer CG............................... NOGALES WASH, AZ (Chula Vista)............................................................. 3,000,000 Senator Kyl CG............................... NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS (DEEPENING), VA................................................ 1,000,000 Senator Warner, Webb CG............................... NORTH DAKOTA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, ND.............................................. 10,000,000 Senator Dorgan CG............................... NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL.................................................... 300,000 Senator Durbin CG............................... OAKLAND HARBOR (50 FOOT PROJECT), CA....................................................... 24,000,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... OLMSTED LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, IL & KY................................................. 114,000,000 The President, Senator McConnell CG............................... OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA.................................................................. 1,600,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter CG............................... OZARK-JETA TAYLOR POWERHOUSE (MAJOR REHAB), AR............................................. 17,300,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor CG............................... PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL.................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Bill Nelson CG............................... PASSAIC RIVER PRESERVATION OF NATURAL STORAGE AREAS, NJ.................................... 1,500,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez CG............................... PERRY CREEK, IA............................................................................ 3,800,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley CG............................... PETALUMA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, CA........................................................... 350,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... PINHOOK CREEK, HUNTSVILLE, AL.............................................................. 1,400,000 Senator Shelby CG............................... POINT MARION, LOCK AND DAM8, MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA & WV.................................... 150,000 The President CG............................... POPLAR ISLAND, MD 1........................................................................ 12,000,000 The President, Senators Mikulski, Cardin CG............................... PORT OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR MAIN CHANNEL DEEPENING, CA...................................... 885,000 Senator Feinstein CG............................... PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR............................................................ 43,000,000 The President CG............................... PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA (PERMANENT), PA..................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Specter, Casey CG............................... PUGET SOUND AND ADJACENT WATERS RESTORATION, WA............................................ 621,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell CG............................... RAMAPO AND MAHWAH RIVERS, MAHWAH, NJ AND SUFFERN, NY....................................... 500,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez, Schumer CG............................... RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, PORT MONMOUTH, NJ.......................................... 2,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez CG............................... RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK SUB-BASIN, NJ............................................. 10,000,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez CG............................... RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & OK.................................................. 1,500,000 Senator Inhofe CG............................... RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM AR, LA & TX.................................................... 2,500,000 Senators Landrieu, Lincoln, Pryor, Vitter CG............................... RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION, AR & LA............................................... 4,000,000 Senators Landrieu, Lincoln, Pryor, Vitter CG............................... RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & SC.................................................... 1,450,000 The President CG............................... RICHMOND CSO, VA........................................................................... 300,000 Senator Warner, Webb CG............................... RIO DE FLAG FLAGSTAFF, AZ.................................................................. 3,000,000 Senator Kyl CG............................... RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE, NM................................... 800,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman CG............................... RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR....................................................................... 12,000,000 The President CG............................... ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, HEADWATERS AREA, VA............................................. 1,075,000 The President, Senator Warner, Webb CG............................... ROBERT C BYRD LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, WV & OH........................................... 1,000,000 The President CG............................... RURAL IDAHO, ID............................................................................ 4,000,000 Senators Craig, Crapo CG............................... RURAL MONTANA, MT.......................................................................... 5,000,000 Senators Baucus, Tester CG............................... RURAL UTAH, UT (EI)........................................................................ 12,000,000 Senators Bennett, Hatch CG............................... RURAL, NV (EI)............................................................................. 18,000,000 Senators Reid, Ensign CG............................... SACRAMENTO DEEPWATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA...................................................... 900,000 The President, Senator Feinstein CG............................... SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION PROJECT, CA............................................... 23,968,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... SACRAMENTO RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, GRR, CA.................................................... 500,000 Senator Feinstein CG............................... SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA IRRIGATION DISTRICT, CA..................................... 500,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX........................................................ 10,000,000 Senators Hutchison, Cornyn CG............................... SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA.......................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA..................................................................... 750,000 Senator Feinstein CG............................... SAN RAMON VALLEY RECYCLED WATER, CA........................................................ 3,500,000 Senator Feinstein CG............................... SAND CREEK WATERSHED, SAUNDERS COUNTY, NE.................................................. 2,400,000 Senators Ben Nelson, Hagel CG............................... SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ........................................................... 2,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez CG............................... SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA............................................................... 14,000,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... SANTA MARIA RIVER, CA...................................................................... 6,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... SAULT STE MARIE, MI........................................................................ 2,000,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow CG............................... SEWARD HARBOR BREAKWATER EXTENSION......................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Stevens CG............................... SHOALWATER BAY SHORELINE, WA............................................................... 2,000,000 Senator Murray CG............................... SIMS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX.................................................................... 21,465,000 The President, Senator Cornyn CG............................... SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS, CA........................................................ 12,000,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... SOUTHWEST VALLEY ALBUQUERQUE, NM........................................................... 8,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman CG............................... ST LOUIS FLOOD PROTECTION, MO.............................................................. 3,750,000 The President, Senator Bond CG............................... ST PAUL HARBOR, AK......................................................................... 2,000,000 Senator Stevens CG............................... ST. LUCIE INLET, FL........................................................................ 4,000,000 The President, Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez CG............................... STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV................................................................. 900,000 The President CG............................... SUCCESS DAM, TULE RIVER (DAM SAFETY), CA................................................... 8,000,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... SUCCESS DAM, TULE RIVER (ENLARGEMENT), CA.................................................. 500,000 Senator Feinstein CG............................... SWOPE PARK INDUSTRIAL AREA, KANSAS CITY, MO................................................ 2,000,000 Senator Bond CG............................... TAHOE BASIN RESTORATION, CA................................................................ 3,000,000 Senators Reid, Feinstein, Ensign CG............................... TAMPA HARBOR, FL........................................................................... 500,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez CG............................... TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX..................................................................... 3,000,000 Senator Hutchison CG............................... TOWNSENDS INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ...................................................... 3,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez CG............................... TRES RIOS, AZ.............................................................................. 3,000,000 Senator Kyl CG............................... TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KS & MO................................................................ 10,000,000 The President, Senators Bond, Roberts CG............................... TUSCALOOSA, AL............................................................................. 7,500,000 Senator Shelby CG............................... TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS (DAM SAFETY)......................................................... 23,800,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts CG............................... UNALASKA, AK............................................................................... 6,000,000 Senators Stevens, Murkowski CG............................... UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CA.................................................................. 5,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION, IL, IA, MN, MO & WI................................... 18,000,000 The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley, Coleman CG............................... UPPER NEWPORT BAY, CA...................................................................... 3,000,000 Senator Feinstein CG............................... VIRGINIA BEACH (HURRICANE PROTECTION), VA.................................................. 3,000,000 Senator Warner, Webb CG............................... WEST SACRAMENTO, CA........................................................................ 2,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... WESTERN SARPY COUNTY AND CLEAR CREEK, NE................................................... 3,000,000 Senators Ben Nelson, Hagel CG............................... WHITE RIVER MINIMUM FLOW, AR............................................................... 2,000,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor CG............................... WILLAMETTE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, OR 1................................................. 3,331,000 The President CG............................... WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC...................................................................... 2,000,000 Senators Dole, Burr CG............................... WOLF CREEK (SEEPAGE CONTROL), KY........................................................... 57,000,000 The President, Senators McConnell, Alexander, Corker CG............................... WOOD RIVER LEVEE, IL....................................................................... 3,700,000 The President, Senator Durbin CG............................... WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC..................................................................... 300,000 Senators Dole, Burr CG............................... WYOMING VALLEY (LEVEE RAISING), PA......................................................... 3,000,000 Senators Specter, Casey CG............................... YUBA RIVER BASIN, CA....................................................................... 3,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... ABANDONED MINE RESTORATION................................................................. 1,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer CG............................... AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL...................................................................... 4,550,000 The President, Senators Leahy, Schumer, Dole CG............................... DAM SAFETY AND SEEPAGE/STABILITY CORRECTION PROGRAM........................................ 48,650,000 The President CG............................... Dam Safety Assurance Studies............................................................... ................. ............................................. CG............................... Cherry Creek Dam, CO................................................................... ................. The President CG............................... Dworshak Dam, ID....................................................................... ................. The President CG............................... Isabella Dam, CA....................................................................... ................. The President, Senator Feinstein CG............................... John Day Lock and Dam, OR & WA......................................................... ................. The President CG............................... Martis Creek Dam, CA & NV.............................................................. ................. The President, Senator Ensign CG............................... Mississippi Lock and Dam 25, MO........................................................ ................. The President CG............................... Seepage/Stability Correction Major Rehabilitation Studies.................................. ................. ............................................. CG............................... Addicks Dam, Buffalo Bayou, TX......................................................... ................. The President CG............................... Ball Mountain Dam, VT.................................................................. ................. The President CG............................... Beach City Dam, OH..................................................................... ................. The President CG............................... Bolivar Dam, OH........................................................................ ................. The President CG............................... East Branch Dam, Clarion River, PA..................................................... ................. The President CG............................... Green River Lake Dam, KY............................................................... ................. The President CG............................... Hidden Dam, CA......................................................................... ................. The President CG............................... Hop Brook Dam, CT...................................................................... ................. The President CG............................... J. Edward Roush Dam, KY................................................................ ................. The President CG............................... Keystone lake Dam, OK.................................................................. ................. The President CG............................... Lake Shelbyville Dam, IL............................................................... ................. The President CG............................... Lewisville Dam, TX..................................................................... ................. The President CG............................... Mansfield Hollow Dam, CT............................................................... ................. The President CG............................... Mohawk Dam, OH......................................................................... ................. The President CG............................... Montgomery Locks and Dam, PA........................................................... ................. The President CG............................... Nolin Lake dam, KY..................................................................... ................. The President CG............................... Rough River Lake Dam, KY............................................................... ................. The President CG............................... Salamonie Lake Dam, KY................................................................. ................. The President CG............................... Whittier Narrows Dam, CA............................................................... ................. The President CG............................... Zoar Levee (Dover Dam), OH............................................................. ................. The President CG............................... DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROGRAM (DMDF)........................................ 8,965,000 The President CG............................... Charleston Harbor, SC 1................................................................ ................. The President, Senator Graham CG............................... Green Bay Harbor, WI 1................................................................. ................. The President, Senator Kohl CG............................... Rouge River, MI 1...................................................................... ................. The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow CG............................... Savannah Harbor, GA 1.................................................................. ................. The President CG............................... EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION FUND................................................................ 21,000,000 The President CG............................... ESTUARY RESTORATION PROGRAM (PUBLIC LAW 106-457)........................................... 1,000,000 The President CG............................... INLAND WATERWAYS USER BOARD (BOARD EXPENSES)............................................... 50,000 The President CG............................... INLAND WATERWAYS USER BOARD (COE EXP)...................................................... 250,000 The President CG............................... SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.............................. 875,000 Inouye CG............................... CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM............................................................. ................. ............................................. Section 14....................... EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (SECTION 14)................................. 10,000,000 The President Section 208...................... SNAGGING AND CLEARING (SECTION 208)........................................................ 500,000 The President Section 208...................... Blackwell Lake, Blackwell, OK.......................................................... ................. The President Section 208...................... Muscatatuck River Log Jam, Scott County, IN............................................ ................. The President Section 208...................... Oran, MO............................................................................... ................. The President Section 103...................... SHORE PROTECTION (SECTION 103)............................................................. 7,500,000 The President Section 103...................... Athol Springs, Lake Erie, NY........................................................... ................. The President Section 103...................... Bay Farm Dike, CA...................................................................... ................. Senator Feinstein Section 103...................... Chesapeake Bay Shoreline, Hampton, VA.................................................. ................. The President Section 103...................... Ft. San Geronimo, PR................................................................... ................. The President Section 103...................... Lake Erie at Painesville, OH........................................................... ................. The President Section 103...................... Lasalle Park, Buffalo, NY.............................................................. ................. The President Section 103...................... Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA........................................................ ................. The President Section 103...................... Old Lakeshore Road, NY................................................................. ................. The President Section 103...................... Philadelphia Shipyard Sea Wall, Philadelphia, PA....................................... ................. The President Section 103...................... Pismo Beach, CA........................................................................ ................. Senator Feinstein Section 103...................... Unalakleet Storm Damage Reduction, Unalakleet, AK...................................... ................. The President, Senator Stevens Section 103...................... Veteran's Drive Shoreline, St. Thomas, USVI............................................ ................. The President Section 107...................... NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107)........................................................... ................. The President Section 107...................... Bass Harbor, ME........................................................................ ................. Snowe, Collins Section 107...................... Charlestown Breachway and Inlet, RI.................................................... ................. The President Section 107...................... Fairless Hills Turning Basin, PA....................................................... ................. Senators Specter, Casey Section 107...................... Grand Marais Harbor of Refuge, MN...................................................... ................. Senator Coleman Section 107...................... Hampton Harbor, NH..................................................................... ................. Senator Gregg Section 107...................... Mackinac Isle, Harbor Breakwall, MI.................................................... ................. The President Section 107...................... McQuade Road Harbor of Refuge, Duluth, MN.............................................. ................. Senators Coleman, Klobuchar Section 107...................... Nassawadox Creek, VA................................................................... ................. The President Section 107...................... North Kohala Navigation Improvements, HI............................................... ................. Senators Inouye, Akaka Section 107...................... Northwest Tennessee Harbor, TN......................................................... ................. Senators Alexander, Corker Section 107...................... Northwestern Michigan, Traverse City, MI............................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow Section 107...................... Ontonagon Channel Extension, MI........................................................ ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow Section 107...................... Ottawa River Navigation, Toledo, OH.................................................... ................. Senator Voinovich Section 107...................... Port Fourchon Extension, Lafourche Parish, LA.......................................... ................. Senators Landrieu, Vitter Section 107...................... Round Pond, Bristol, ME................................................................ ................. Snowe, Collins Section 107...................... Savoonga Harbor, AK.................................................................... ................. The President Section 107...................... St. Jerome Creek, MD................................................................... ................. Senator Cardin Section 111...................... MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES (SECTION 111) 1................................................ 10,000,000 The President Section 111...................... Camp Ellis Restoration Project, ME..................................................... ................. The President, Senators Snowe, Collins Section 111...................... Fairport Harbor, OH.................................................................... ................. The President, Senator Voinovich Section 111...................... Mattituck Harbor, NY................................................................... ................. The President, Senator Schumer Section 111...................... Mobile Pass, AL........................................................................ ................. The President Section 111...................... Tybee Island Channel Impacts, GA....................................................... ................. The President Section 111...................... Vermillion, OH......................................................................... ................. The President Sections 204, 207, 933........... BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL (SECTION 204, 207, 933) 1.............................. 7,187,000 The President Sections 204, 207, 933........... 21st Avenue West Channel, Duluth, MN................................................... ................. The President Sections 204, 207, 933........... Atchafalaya River, Shell Island, St. Mary Parish, LA................................... ................. Senator Landrieu Sections 204, 207, 933........... Barataria Bay Waterway, LA............................................................. ................. Senators Landrieu, Vitter Sections 204, 207, 933........... Blackhawk Bottoms, IA.................................................................. ................. The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley Sections 204, 207, 933........... Calcasieu River, Cameron Parish, LA.................................................... ................. The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter Sections 204, 207, 933........... Isle Aux Herbes, AL.................................................................... ................. The President Sections 204, 207, 933........... Maumee Bay Restoration, OH............................................................. ................. The President Sections 204, 207, 933........... Newburyport Harbor, MA................................................................. ................. Senators Kennedy, Kerry Sections 204, 207, 933........... Restoration of the Cat Islands Chain, Green Bay, WI.................................... ................. The President, Senator Kohl Sections 204, 207, 933........... Shell Island Pass, LA.................................................................. ................. The President Sections 204, 207, 933........... Wanchese Marsh Creation, NC............................................................ ................. The President Sections 204, 207, 933........... Wynn Road, Oregon, OH.................................................................. ................. The President Section 205...................... FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION 205)....................................................... 43,123,000 The President Section 205...................... Ada, MN................................................................................ ................. Senators Coleman, Klobuchar Section 205...................... Assunpink Creek, Hamiliton Township, Mercer County, NJ................................. ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Section 205...................... Bayou Choupique, St Mary Parish, LA.................................................... ................. Senators Landrieu, Vitter Section 205...................... Bayou Queue de Tortue, Vermillion Parish, LA........................................... ................. Senators Landrieu, Vitter Section 205...................... Beaver Creek & Tribs, Bristol, TN...................................................... ................. The President, Senator Alexander Section 205...................... Blacksnake Creek, St. Joseph, MO....................................................... ................. The President, Senator Bond Section 205...................... Concordia, KS.......................................................................... ................. Senators Brownback, Roberts Section 205...................... Cosgrove Creek, Calaveras County, CA................................................... ................. Senator Feinstein Section 205...................... Crosscreek, Rossville, KS.............................................................. ................. Senators Brownback, Roberts Section 205...................... Duck Creek Flood Warning System, OH.................................................... ................. The President Section 205...................... Elkton, MD............................................................................. ................. Senator Mikulski Section 205...................... Eureka Creek, Mannhattan, KS........................................................... ................. Senator Brownback Section 205...................... Findley, OH............................................................................ ................. Senators Voinovich, Brown Section 205...................... Granite Falls, MN...................................................................... ................. Senators Coleman, Klobuchar Section 205...................... Hatch, NM.............................................................................. ................. Senators Domenici, Bingaman Section 205...................... Hopkinsville, Little River, KY......................................................... ................. Senator McConnell Section 205...................... Independence, OH....................................................................... ................. Senator Voinovich Section 205...................... Indian/Dry Creek Cedar Rapids, IA...................................................... ................. Senators Harkin, Grassley Section 205...................... Jackson Brook, Morris County, NJ....................................................... ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Section 205...................... Jewett Brook, Laconia, NH.............................................................. (100,000) Senator Gregg Section 205...................... Keopu-Hienaloli Strm, HI............................................................... ................. The President Section 205...................... Kings Point, Warren County, MS......................................................... ................. Senators Cochran, Wicker Section 205...................... Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, HI.............................................................. ................. Senator Inouye Section 205...................... Las Gallinas Creek/Santa Venetia Levee, CA............................................. ................. Senator Feinstein Section 205...................... Little Mill Creek, Elsemere, DE........................................................ ................. Senator Salazar Section 205...................... Little River Diversion, Dutchtown, MO.................................................. ................. The President, Senator Bond Section 205...................... Livingston, MT......................................................................... ................. The President Section 205...................... Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA............................................................... ................. The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley Section 205...................... McKinney Bayou, Tunica County, MS...................................................... ................. Senators Cochran, Wicker Section 205...................... Mill Brook, Highland Park, NJ.......................................................... ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Section 205...................... Montevideo, MN......................................................................... ................. Senator Coleman Section 205...................... North River, Peabody, MA............................................................... ................. Senators Kennedy, Kerry Section 205...................... Oak Creek, Florence, Colorado.......................................................... ................. Senators Allard, Salazar Section 205...................... Pailet Basin, Barataria, LA............................................................ ................. Senator Vitter Section 205...................... Palai Stream, Hawaii, HI............................................................... ................. Senators Inouye, Akaka Section 205...................... Pecan Creek, Gainesville, TX........................................................... ................. The President, Senator Hutchison Section 205...................... Pennsville, NJ......................................................................... ................. Senator Lautenberg Section 205...................... Pennsylvania Avenue Improvement Project, Bethany Beach, DE............................. ................. Senators Biden, Carper Section 205...................... Philadelphia Shipyard Sea Wall, Philadelphia, PA....................................... ................. Senator Casey Section 205...................... Platte River, Fremont, NE.............................................................. ................. The President, Senators Ben Nelson, Hagel Section 205...................... Platte River, Schuyler, NE............................................................. ................. Senators Ben Nelson, Hagel Section 205...................... Poplar Brook, Deal and Ocean Township, NJ.............................................. ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Section 205...................... Randolph, NE (Middle Logan Creek)...................................................... ................. Senator Hagel Section 205...................... Red Oak Creek, Red Oak, IA............................................................. ................. Senator Grassley Section 205...................... Rio Descalabrado, PR................................................................... ................. The President Section 205...................... Rio Guamani-Guaya, PR.................................................................. ................. The President Section 205...................... Salisbury, MA.......................................................................... ................. The President, Senators Kennedy, Kerry Section 205...................... Swannanoa River Watershed, NC.......................................................... ................. Senator Dole Section 205...................... Town of Carencro, Lafayette Parish, LA................................................. ................. Senators Landrieu, Vitter Section 205...................... Turkey Creek, Ben Hill County, GA...................................................... ................. Senators Biden, Carper Section 205...................... Upper Passaic River and Tributaries, Long Hill Township, NJ............................ ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Section 205...................... Wahpeton, ND........................................................................... ................. Senator Dorgan Section 205...................... Wailele Strm, Oahu, HI................................................................. ................. The President Section 205...................... White Slough, CA....................................................................... ................. The President Section 205...................... Winnebago River, Mason City, IA........................................................ ................. Senator Grassley Section 205...................... WV Statewide Flood Warning System, WV.................................................. ................. The President, Senator Byrd Section 205...................... Wynne, AR.............................................................................. ................. Senators Lincoln, Pryor Section 206...................... AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (SECTION 206)................................................ 25,000,000 The President Section 206...................... Arkansas River Habitat Restoration Project, CO......................................... ................. The President Section 206...................... Arrowhead Creek, OR.................................................................... ................. Senators Wyden, Smith Section 206...................... Asheville-Buncomb County, NC........................................................... ................. Senator Dole Section 206...................... Beaver Creek, OR....................................................................... ................. Senators Wyden, Smith Section 206...................... Blue Hole Lake State Park, NM.......................................................... ................. Senators Domenici, Bingaman Section 206...................... Blue River, CO......................................................................... ................. The President, Senator Salazar Section 206...................... Bottomless Lakes State Park, NM........................................................ ................. Senators Domenici, Bingaman Section 206...................... Brownsville Branch, AR................................................................. ................. Senators Lincoln, Pryor Section 206...................... Buras Marina, LA....................................................................... ................. Senator Landrieu Section 206...................... Camp Creek-Zumwalt Prairie, OR......................................................... ................. Senators Wyden, Smith Section 206...................... Carpenter Creek, WA.................................................................... ................. The President Section 206...................... Chariton River/Rathbun Lake, IA........................................................ ................. Senators Harkin, Grassley Section 206...................... Chattahoochee Fall-Line Ecosystem Restoration, GA...................................... ................. Senators Shelby, Chambliss, Isakson Section 206...................... Christine and Hickson Dams, ND......................................................... ................. The President, Senator Dorgan Section 206...................... Codorus Creek Watershed Restoration, PA................................................ ................. Senator Casey Section 206...................... Concord Streams Restoration, NC........................................................ ................. The President, Senator Dole Section 206...................... Deep Run/Tiber Hudson, Howard County, MD............................................... ................. Senators Mikulski, Cardin Section 206...................... Dents Run, Elk County, PA.............................................................. ................. The President, Senator Casey Section 206...................... Dog Island Shoals, MD.................................................................. ................. Senator Cardin Section 206...................... Drayton Dam, ND........................................................................ ................. The President, Senators Dorgan, Coleman Section 206...................... Duck Creek, Davenport, IA.............................................................. ................. Senator Grassley Section 206...................... Emiquon Preserve, Fulton County, IL.................................................... ................. Senator Durbin Section 206...................... Eugene Delta Ponds, OR................................................................. ................. The President, Senators Wyden, Smith Section 206...................... Eugene Field, IL....................................................................... ................. The President Section 206...................... Gerritsen Creek, Brooklyn, NY.......................................................... ................. Senator Schumer Section 206...................... Goose Creek, Boulder, CO............................................................... ................. The President, Senator Salazar Section 206...................... Greenbury Point, MD.................................................................... ................. Senator Cardin Section 206...................... Heron Haven, NE........................................................................ ................. Senator Hagel Section 206...................... Hoffman Dam, IL........................................................................ ................. The President Section 206...................... Incline and Third Creeks, NV........................................................... ................. Senator Ensign Section 206...................... Jackson Creek, GA...................................................................... ................. The President Section 206...................... Janes-Wallace Memorial Dam, Santa Rosa, NM............................................. ................. Senators Domenici, Bingaman Section 206...................... Kings Park, NY......................................................................... ................. Senator Schumer Section 206...................... Lake Killarney, Louisiana State Penitentiary, LA....................................... ................. Senator Landrieu Section 206...................... Lake Verret, Assumption Parish, LA..................................................... ................. Senators Landrieu, Vitter Section 206...................... Lower Boulder Creek, CO................................................................ ................. Senator Salazar Section 206...................... Lower Hempstead Harbor, NY............................................................. ................. Senator Schumer Section 206...................... Mandeville Ecosystem Restoration, LA................................................... ................. Senator Vitter Section 206...................... Manhasset Bay, NY...................................................................... ................. Senator Schumer Section 206...................... Marion Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, MI............................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow Section 206...................... Milford Pond, Milford, MA.............................................................. ................. Senators Kennedy, Kerry Section 206...................... Mokuhinia/Mokuula Restoration, HI...................................................... ................. Senators, Inouye, Akaka Section 206...................... Mud Creek, Great South Bay, NY......................................................... ................. Senator Schumer Section 206...................... Musconetcong River Dam Removals, NJ.................................................... ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Section 206...................... North Beach Wetland Restoration, MD.................................................... ................. Senators Mikulski, Cardin Section 206...................... North Fork Gunnison River, CO.......................................................... ................. Senator Salazar Section 206...................... Northport Harbor, Huntington, NY....................................................... ................. Senator Schumer Section 206...................... Northwest Branch Anacostia River, MD................................................... ................. The President, Senators Mikulski, Cardin Section 206...................... Ogden River Restoration, UT............................................................ ................. Senator Bennett Section 206...................... Olentangy 5th Avenue Dam, OH........................................................... ................. Senator Voinovich Section 206...................... Orland Park, IL........................................................................ ................. The President Section 206...................... Painter Creek, MN...................................................................... ................. Senators Coleman, Klobuchar Section 206...................... Pennsville, Salem County, NJ........................................................... ................. Senator Menendez Section 206...................... Pleasure Island, MD.................................................................... ................. Senator Cardin Section 206...................... Rancocas Creek Fish Passage Restoration Project, NJ.................................... ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Section 206...................... Rose Bay Ecosystem Restoration Project, FL............................................. ................. The President Section 206...................... Soundview Park, Bronx, NY.............................................................. ................. Senator Schumer Section 206...................... Spring Lake, San Marcos, TX............................................................ ................. Senator Hutchison Section 206...................... Springfield Mill Race Stabilization and Protection, OR................................. ................. Senators Wyden, Smith Section 206...................... Squaw Creek, (Round Lake Drain), IL.................................................... ................. Senator Durbin Section 206...................... St. Helena-Napa River, CA.............................................................. ................. The President Section 206...................... Stephenville WWTP, Meridian, TX........................................................ ................. The President Section 206...................... Storm Lake, IA......................................................................... ................. The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley Section 206...................... Sweetwater Reservoir Ecosystem Restoration, CA......................................... ................. Senator Feinstein Section 206...................... Swift Creek Asbestos Sediment Management, WA........................................... ................. Senator Cantwell Section 206...................... Tamarisk Eradication, CO............................................................... ................. Senator Salazar Section 206...................... Tangier Island, Accomack County, VA.................................................... ................. Senators Warner, Webb Section 206...................... University Lakes, Baton Rouge, LA...................................................... ................. Senators Landrieu, Vitter Section 206...................... Upper York Creek, Dam Removal, CA...................................................... ................. Senator Feinstein Section 206...................... Urieville Lake, MD..................................................................... ................. Senator Cardin Section 206...................... Ventura Marsh Habitat Restoration, Clear Lake, IA...................................... ................. The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley Section 206...................... Vermillion River Ecosystem Restoration, LA............................................. ................. Senator Vitter Section 206...................... Western Branch, Patuxent River, MD..................................................... ................. Senators Mikulski, Cardin Section 206...................... Whitebreast Creek Watershed, IA........................................................ ................. Senator Grassley Section 206...................... Wilson Bay Restoration, NC............................................................. ................. The President Section 206...................... Winneapaug Pond Restoration, RI........................................................ ................. Senators Reed, Whitehouse Section 206...................... Wright's Creek, Dorchester Creek, MD................................................... ................. Senator Cardin Section 206...................... Zemurray Park Lake Restoration, Tangipahoa Parish, LA.................................. ................. Senator Vitter Section 1135..................... PROJECT MODS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT (SECTION 1135)............................. 25,000,000 The President Section 1135..................... Assunpink Creek, Trenton, NJ........................................................... ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Section 1135..................... Bayou Desiard, Monroe, LA.............................................................. ................. Senator Landrieu Section 1135..................... Belhaven Harbor, NC.................................................................... ................. Senator Dole Section 1135..................... Bloomington State Park, MO............................................................. ................. The President Section 1135..................... Blue Valley Wetlands, Jackson, MO...................................................... ................. The President Section 1135..................... Braided Reach, WA...................................................................... ................. The President Section 1135..................... Duck Creek Conservation Area, Stoddard County, MO...................................... ................. The President Section 1135..................... Eagleland Ecosystem, TX................................................................ ................. The President Section 1135..................... Frazier/Whitehorse Oxbow Lake Weir, LA................................................. ................. Senator Landrieu Section 1135..................... Gerritsen Creek, NY.................................................................... ................. The President Section 1135..................... Green River Dam Modifications, KY...................................................... ................. The President Section 1135..................... Indian Ridge Marsh, Chicago, IL........................................................ ................. The President Section 1135..................... Kanaha Pond Wildlife Sanctuary Restoration, HI......................................... ................. The President Section 1135..................... Kaunakakai Stream Environmental Restoration, HI........................................ ................. The President, Senators Inouye, Akaka Section 1135..................... Lake Champlain Lamprey Barriers, VT.................................................... ................. Senator Leahy Section 1135..................... Lake Fausse Pointe, Iberia Parish, LA.................................................. ................. Senator Vitter Section 1135..................... Lake St. Joseph, Tensas Parish, LA..................................................... ................. Senators Landrieu, Vitter Section 1135..................... Lake Whittington Weir, MS & AR......................................................... ................. Senators Cochran, Wicker Section 1135..................... Las Cruces Dam Environmental Restoration, Dona Ana County, NM.......................... ................. Senators Domenici, Bingaman Section 1135..................... Lincoln Park West, Ecosystem Restoration Study, NJ..................................... ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Section 1135..................... Lower Assunpink Creek, NJ.............................................................. ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Section 1135..................... Lower Cache Restoration, AR............................................................ ................. Senators Lincoln, Pryor Section 1135..................... Lower Columbia Slough, OR.............................................................. ................. The President, Senators Wyden, Smith Section 1135..................... Lower Kingman Island, DC............................................................... ................. The President Section 1135..................... Millwood Lake, Grassy Lake, AR......................................................... ................. Senators Lincoln, Pryor Section 1135..................... Mordecai Island Coastal Wetland Restoration, NJ........................................ ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Section 1135..................... Morganza Fore-Bay Restoration, LA...................................................... ................. Senator Vitter Section 1135..................... Pine Mount Creek, NJ................................................................... ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Section 1135..................... Pond Creek Salt Marsh Restoration, Cape May County, NJ................................. ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Section 1135..................... Prison Farm, ND........................................................................ ................. The President, Senator Dorgan Section 1135..................... Pueblo of Santa Ana Aquatic Restoration, NM............................................ ................. Senator Bingaman Section 1135..................... Rathbun Lake, South Fork Restoration, IA............................................... ................. Senators Harkin, Grassley Section 1135..................... Rock Creek at Boyle Park, Little Rock, AR.............................................. ................. Senators Lincoln, Pryor Section 1135..................... Route 66 Environmental Restoration, Albuquerque, NM.................................... ................. Senators Domenici, Bingaman Section 1135..................... Sand Hill River, MN.................................................................... ................. The President Section 1135..................... Shorty's Islands, WA................................................................... ................. The President, Senators Murray, Cantwell Section 1135..................... Spring Creek, NY....................................................................... ................. Senator Schumer Section 1135..................... Tappan Lake, OH........................................................................ ................. The President, Senator Inhofe Section 1135..................... Tujunga Wash Environmental Restoration, CA............................................. ................. Senator Feinstein Section 1135..................... Village of Oyster, Northampton County, VA.............................................. ................. Senators Warner, Webb MR&T--GI......................... ALEXANDRIA TO THE GULF, LA................................................................. 790,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter MR&T--GI......................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM LAND STUDY, LA........................................... ................. The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter MR&T--GI......................... BAYOU METO BASIN, AR....................................................................... 43,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor MR&T--GI......................... COLDWATER RIVER BASIN BELOW ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS............................................. 130,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--GI......................... COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA......................................................... 1,430,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Landrieu, Wicker MR&T--GI......................... MEMPHIS METRO AREA, STORM WATER MGMT STUDY, TN............................................. 34,000 The President MR&T--GI......................... MORGANZA TO THE GULF, LA................................................................... 6,000,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter MR&T--GI......................... QUIVER RIVER, MS........................................................................... 250,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--GI......................... SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS, AR..................................................................... 400,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor MR&T--GI......................... SPRING BAYOU, LA........................................................................... 300,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter MR&T--CG......................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA..................................................... 2,025,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter MR&T--CG......................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA...................................................................... 15,500,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter MR&T--CG......................... CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN........................................... 50,200,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Lincoln, Pryor MR&T--CG......................... CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, DIKES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN.................................... ................. The President MR&T--CG......................... CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, REVETMENT OPERATIONS, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN..................... ................. The President MR&T--CG......................... GRAND PRAIRIE REGION, AR................................................................... 9,000,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor MR&T--CG......................... MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA............................................................... 3,933,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter MR&T--CG......................... MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN...................................... 63,823,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Landrieu, Wicker, Bond, Lincoln, Pryor, Vitter MR&T--CG......................... ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR & MO................................................. 5,700,000 Senators Bond, Lincoln, Pryor MR&T--CG......................... ST. JOHNS BAYOU AND NEW MADRID FLOODWAY, MO................................................ 200,000 Senator Bond MR&T--CG......................... YAZOO BASIN, BACKWATER LESS ROCKY BAYOU.................................................... 50,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--CG......................... YAZOO BASIN--BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS....................................................... 2,275,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--CG......................... YAZOO BASIN--DELTA HEADWATERS PROJECT, MS.................................................. 18,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--CG......................... YAZOO BASIN--MAIN STEM, MS................................................................. 25,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--CG......................... YAZOO BASIN--REFORMULATION UNIT, MS........................................................ 2,800,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--CG......................... YAZOO BASIN--UPPER YAZOO PROJECTS, MS...................................................... 14,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--CG......................... YAZOO BASIN--YAZOO BACKWATER, MS........................................................... 5,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--O&M........................ ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA..................................................... 2,117,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter MR&T--O&M........................ ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA...................................................................... 8,619,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter MR&T--O&M........................ BATON ROUGE HARBOR, DEVIL SWAMP, LA........................................................ 162,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter MR&T--O&M........................ BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA......................................................... 42,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter MR&T--O&M........................ BONNET CARRE, LA........................................................................... 2,346,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter MR&T--O&M........................ CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN........................................... 70,000,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Landrieu, Wicker MR&T--O&M........................ GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS...................................................................... 436,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--O&M........................ HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR......................................................... 128,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor MR&T--O&M........................ HICKMAN/MAGNOLIA BLUFF, KY................................................................. 60,000 Senator McConnell MR&T--O&M........................ INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR.......................................................... 249,000 The President MR&T--O&M........................ INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL.......................................................... 135,000 The President MR&T--O&M........................ INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY.......................................................... 93,000 The President MR&T--O&M........................ INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA.......................................................... 1,927,000 The President, Senator Landrieu MR&T--O&M........................ INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO.......................................................... 185,000 The President MR&T--O&M........................ INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS.......................................................... 101,000 The President MR&T--O&M........................ INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN.......................................................... 81,000 The President MR&T--O&M........................ LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK, AR....................................................... 256,000 The President MR&T--O&M........................ LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR....................................................... 161,000 The President MR&T--O&M........................ LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK LEVEES, LA..................................................... 53,000 The President MR&T--O&M........................ MAPPING.................................................................................... 1,488,000 The President, Senator Landrieu MR&T--O&M........................ MEMPHIS HARBOR, MCKELLAR LAKE, TN.......................................................... 3,283,000 The President MR&T--O&M........................ MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA............................................................... 578,000 The President, Senator Landrieu MR&T--O&M........................ MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN...................................... 16,368,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Landrieu, Wicker, Bond, Lincoln, Pryor, Vitter MR&T--O&M........................ OLD RIVER, LA.............................................................................. 13,882,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter MR&T--O&M........................ ST FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO.................................................................. 8,200,000 The President, Senators Bond, Lincoln, Pryor MR&T--O&M........................ TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS RIVERS, AR & LA............................................. 1,880,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Lincoln, Pryor, Vitter MR&T--O&M........................ TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA...................................................... 2,501,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter MR&T--O&M........................ VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS....................................................................... 424,000 The President, Senator Wicker MR&T--O&M........................ WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO........................................................................ 4,567,000 The President, Senator Bond MR&T--O&M........................ WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR.................................................................. 1,000,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS............................................................ 6,673,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS....................................................... 1,500,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS................................................................. 7,417,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, GREENWOOD, MS................................................................. 1,650,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS.............................................................. 7,166,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS................................................................. 2,237,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS............................................................... 8,916,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS............................................................... 925,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, WILL M WHITTINGTON AUX CHAN, MS............................................... 285,000 The President MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, MS...................................................... 442,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO CITY, MS................................................................ 534,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker O&M.............................. ABIQUIU DAM, NM............................................................................ 2,220,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman O&M.............................. ABSECON INLET, NJ.......................................................................... 265,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez O&M.............................. ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL.................................................................... 15,672,000 The President, Senators Shelby, Sessions O&M.............................. ALABAMA--COOSA COMPREHENSIVE WATER STUDY, AL............................................... 375,000 The President O&M.............................. ALAMO LAKE, AZ............................................................................. 1,585,000 The President O&M.............................. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID....................................................................... 1,539,000 The President O&M.............................. ALLATOONA LAKE, GA......................................................................... 6,016,000 The President O&M.............................. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA........................................................................ 6,578,000 The President O&M.............................. ALMOND LAKE, NY............................................................................ 424,000 The President O&M.............................. ALPENA HARBOR, MI.......................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH........................................................................ 1,439,000 The President O&M.............................. ALVIN R BUSH DAM, PA....................................................................... 591,000 The President O&M.............................. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK....................................................................... 17,601,000 The President O&M.............................. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT RIVERS, GA, AL & FL.................................. 3,418,000 The President, Senator Shelby O&M.............................. APPLEGATE LAKE, OR......................................................................... 904,000 The President O&M.............................. APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA....................................................................... 500,000 Senators Warner, Webb O&M.............................. AQUILLA LAKE, TX........................................................................... 1,354,000 The President O&M.............................. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI......................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. ARCADIA LAKE, OK........................................................................... 472,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR......................................................................... 100,000 The President O&M.............................. ARKANSAS--RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL--AREA VI....................................... 1,415,000 The President O&M.............................. ARKPORT DAM, NY............................................................................ 225,000 The President O&M.............................. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH....................................................................... 1,850,000 The President, Senator Voinovich O&M.............................. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF AND BLACK, LA.................................... 8,993,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, GA......................................................... 1,000,000 The President, Senators Chambliss, Isakson O&M.............................. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NC......................................................... 2,000,000 The President, Senator Dole O&M.............................. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC......................................................... 1,500,000 The President, Senator Graham O&M.............................. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--ACC, VA.................................................... 1,823,000 The President O&M.............................. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--DSC, VA.................................................... 967,000 The President O&M.............................. AU SABLE, MI............................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA.................................................................. 215,000 The President O&M.............................. B EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, NC.......................................................... 1,633,000 The President O&M.............................. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT..................................................................... 719,000 The President, Senator Leahy O&M.............................. BALTIMORE HARBOR (DRIFT REMOVAL), MD....................................................... 338,000 The President, Senators Mikulski, Cardin O&M.............................. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (50 FOOT), MD................................................ 16,193,000 The President, Senators Mikulski, Cardin O&M.............................. BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA................................................................. 926,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. BARBERS POINT HARBOR, HI................................................................... 548,000 The President, Senator Inouye O&M.............................. BARBOUR TERMINAL CHANNEL, TX............................................................... 1,417,000 The President O&M.............................. BARDWELL LAKE, TX.......................................................................... 2,162,000 The President O&M.............................. BARKLEY DAM AND LAKE BARKLEY, KY & TN...................................................... 10,255,000 The President O&M.............................. BARNEGAT INLET, NJ......................................................................... 225,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez O&M.............................. BARRE FALLS DAM, MA........................................................................ 580,000 The President O&M.............................. BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY...................................................................... 5,969,000 The President, Senator McConnell O&M.............................. BAY PORT HARBOR, MI........................................................................ ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA................................................................. 809,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. BAYOU LACOMBE, LA.......................................................................... 450,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE JUMP WATERWAY, LA............................................ 724,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. BAYOU PIERRE, LA........................................................................... 18,000 The President, Senator Landrieu O&M.............................. BAYOU SEGNETTE WATERWAY, LA................................................................ 321,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER, LA........................................................ 14,000 The President, Senator Landrieu O&M.............................. BAYOU TECHE, LA............................................................................ 209,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. BAYPORT SHIP CHANNEL, TX................................................................... 3,122,000 The President O&M.............................. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO........................................................................ 332,000 The President O&M.............................. BEAVER LAKE, AR............................................................................ 5,270,000 The President O&M.............................. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV........................................................................ 2,500,000 The President, Senator Byrd O&M.............................. BELTON LAKE, TX............................................................................ 3,567,000 The President O&M.............................. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA........................................................................ 1,311,000 The President O&M.............................. BENBROOK LAKE, TX.......................................................................... 2,302,000 The President O&M.............................. BERLIN LAKE, OH............................................................................ 4,867,000 The President O&M.............................. BIG BAY HARBOR, MI......................................................................... ................. Senator Levin O&M.............................. BIG BEND DAM, LAKE SHARPE, SD.............................................................. 6,799,000 The President O&M.............................. BIG SANDY HARBOR, KY....................................................................... 1,250,000 The President O&M.............................. BIGSTONE LAKE WHETSTONE RIVER, MN & SD..................................................... 172,000 The President O&M.............................. BIRCH HILL DAM, MA......................................................................... 574,000 The President O&M.............................. BIRCH LAKE, OK............................................................................. 648,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. BLACK BUTTE LAKE, CA....................................................................... 1,954,000 The President O&M.............................. BLACK RIVER (GOGEBIC), MI.................................................................. ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY................................................ 1,235,000 The President O&M.............................. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT........................................................................ 416,000 The President O&M.............................. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL..................................................... 22,191,000 The President, Senators Shelby, Sessions O&M.............................. BLACKWATER DAM, NH......................................................................... 567,000 The President O&M.............................. BLAKELY MT DAM, LAKE OUACHITA, AR.......................................................... 8,384,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor O&M.............................. BLOCK ISLAND HARBOR, RI (old Harbor)....................................................... 500,000 The President, Senator Reed O&M.............................. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA........................................................................ 2,736,000 The President O&M.............................. BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR..................................................................... 1,427,000 The President O&M.............................. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR........................................................................ 427,000 The President O&M.............................. BLUESTONE LAKE, WV......................................................................... 1,508,000 The President O&M.............................. BOGUE INLET, NC............................................................................ 400,000 Senator Dole O&M.............................. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA........................................................... 9,691,000 The President O&M.............................. BOSTON HARBOR, MA.......................................................................... 6,000,000 The President, Senators Kennedy, Kerry O&M.............................. BOWMAN--HALEY LAKE, ND..................................................................... 153,000 The President O&M.............................. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX................................................................... 3,259,000 The President, Senator Cornyn O&M.............................. BRIDGEPORT HARBOR DREDGING, CT............................................................. 2,000,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman O&M.............................. BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK........................................................................ 1,903,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. BRONX RIVER, NY............................................................................ 250,000 The President, Senator Schumer O&M.............................. BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN........................................................................ 1,649,000 The President O&M.............................. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA....................................................................... 5,545,000 The President, Senators Chambliss, Isakson O&M.............................. BUCHANAN DAM, HV EASTMAN LAKE, CA.......................................................... 1,820,000 The President O&M.............................. BUCKHORN LAKE, KY.......................................................................... 2,433,000 The President O&M.............................. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX.......................................................... 1,723,000 The President O&M.............................. BUFFALO HARBOR, NY......................................................................... 50,000 The President O&M.............................. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA....................................................................... 515,000 The President O&M.............................. BUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA...................................................... 7,946,000 The President O&M.............................. BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR....................................................................... 7,367,000 The President O&M.............................. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN.................................................................. 160,000 The President O&M.............................. BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV........................................................................ 1,973,000 The President O&M.............................. BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, NY..................................................................... 220,000 The President, Senator Schumer O&M.............................. CADDO LAKE, LA............................................................................. 181,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH...................................................................... 2,149,000 The President O&M.............................. CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN....................................................................... 2,053,000 The President O&M.............................. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA............................................................... 14,968,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL & IN.......................................................... 4,780,000 The President O&M.............................. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL....................................................................... 4,404,000 The President, Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez O&M.............................. CANTON LAKE, OK............................................................................ 1,707,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. CANYON LAKE, TX............................................................................ 3,686,000 The President O&M.............................. CAPE COD CANAL, MA......................................................................... 11,546,000 The President O&M.............................. CAPE FEAR RIVER ABOVE WILMINGTON, NC....................................................... 718,000 The President, Senator Dole O&M.............................. CARLYLE LAKE, IL........................................................................... 4,155,000 The President, Senator Durbin O&M.............................. CAROLINA BEACH INLET, NC................................................................... 600,000 Senator Dole O&M.............................. CARR CREEK LAKE, KY........................................................................ 1,797,000 The President O&M.............................. CARTERS DAM AND LAKE, GA................................................................... 7,703,000 The President O&M.............................. CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO.................................................................. 500,000 The President, Senator Bond O&M.............................. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI....................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. CAVE RUN LAKE, KY.......................................................................... 1,098,000 The President O&M.............................. CECIL M HARDEN LAKE, IN.................................................................... 1,226,000 The President O&M.............................. CENTER HILL LAKE, TN....................................................................... 7,021,000 The President O&M.............................. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL........................................................... 13,234,000 The President O&M.............................. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA................................................................. 5,360,000 The President O&M.............................. CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX................................................................ 348,000 The President O&M.............................. CHANNELS IN LAKE ST CLAIR, MI.............................................................. 156,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. CHARLES RIVER NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREA, MA.............................................. 291,000 The President O&M.............................. CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC...................................................................... 9,947,000 The President, Senator Graham O&M.............................. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI...................................................................... 197,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO......................................................................... 1,509,000 The President, Senators Allard, Salazar O&M.............................. CHEATHAM LOCK AND DAM, TN.................................................................. 6,829,000 The President O&M.............................. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK...................................................................... 2,225,000 The President O&M.............................. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO...................................................................... 1,203,000 The President, Senators Allard, Salazar O&M.............................. CHETCO RIVER, OR........................................................................... 574,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith O&M.............................. CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX, SD.......................................... 3,000,000 Senators Johnson, Thune O&M.............................. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL......................................................................... 2,015,000 The President O&M.............................. CHICAGO RIVER, IL.......................................................................... 475,000 The President O&M.............................. CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN...................................................... 1,200,000 The President O&M.............................. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, WA....................................................................... 785,000 The President O&M.............................. CHINCOTEAGUE HARBOR OF REFUGE, VA.......................................................... 266,000 The President O&M.............................. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA..................................................................... 207,000 The President O&M.............................. CLAIBORNE COUNTY PORT, MS.................................................................. 60,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker O&M.............................. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN LAKE, MO................................................ 6,449,000 The President, Senator Bond O&M.............................. CLARENCE J BROWN DAM, OH................................................................... 2,520,000 The President O&M.............................. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO........................................................................ 2,825,000 The President, Senator Bond O&M.............................. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH....................................................................... 6,710,000 The President, Senator Voinovich O&M.............................. CLINTON LAKE, KS........................................................................... 2,042,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. CLINTON RIVER, MI.......................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. COCHITI LAKE, NM........................................................................... 2,392,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman O&M.............................. COLD BROOK LAKE, SD........................................................................ 303,000 The President O&M.............................. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ...................................................................... 243,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez O&M.............................. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT................................................................... 547,000 The President O&M.............................. COLUMBIA & LWR WILLAMETTE R BLW VANCOUVER, WA & PORTLAND................................... 18,052,000 The President, Senators Murray, Wyden, Smith O&M.............................. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA & OR....................................................... 500,000 The President, Senators Murray, Cantwell O&M.............................. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & WA....................................................... 15,125,000 The President, Senators Murray, Wyden, Smith O&M.............................. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK AND SAND ISLAND, WA......................................... 500,000 The President, Senators Murray, Cantwell O&M.............................. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA AND THE DALLES, OR.................................... 640,000 The President O&M.............................. CONANT BROOK LAKE, MA...................................................................... 232,000 The President O&M.............................. CONCHAS LAKE, NM........................................................................... 1,121,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman O&M.............................. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA................................................................... 1,734,000 The President O&M.............................. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH........................................................................ 350,000 The President O&M.............................. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC........................................................ 4,685,000 The President, Senator Graham O&M.............................. COOS BAY, OR............................................................................... 4,769,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith O&M.............................. COPAN LAKE, OK............................................................................. 937,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. COQUILLE RIVER, OR......................................................................... 307,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith O&M.............................. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA........................................................................ 2,887,000 The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley O&M.............................. CORDELL HULL DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN......................................................... 6,386,000 The President O&M.............................. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX............................................................ 3,398,000 The President O&M.............................. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR..................................................................... 991,000 The President O&M.............................. COTTONWOOD SPRINGS LAKE, SD................................................................ 223,000 The President O&M.............................. COUGAR LAKE, OR............................................................................ 5,380,000 The President O&M.............................. COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS..................................................................... 1,328,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA........................................................................ 1,847,000 The President O&M.............................. COYOTE VALLEY DAM, LAKE MENDOCINO, CA...................................................... 3,384,000 The President O&M.............................. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA..................................................................... 2,530,000 The President O&M.............................. CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV............................................................ 98,000 The President O&M.............................. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA...................................................................... 625,000 The President O&M.............................. DALE HOLLOW LAKE, TN....................................................................... 6,262,000 The President O&M.............................. DANA POINT HARBOR, CA...................................................................... 700,000 Senator Boxer O&M.............................. DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM, AR................................................................ 8,491,000 The President O&M.............................. DEER CREEK LAKE, OH........................................................................ 1,359,000 The President O&M.............................. DEGRAY LAKE, AR............................................................................ 6,317,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor O&M.............................. DELAWARE LAKE, OH.......................................................................... 1,445,000 The President O&M.............................. DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, NJ............................................................... 15,000 The President O&M.............................. DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA, NJ, PA & DE....................................... 18,778,000 The President, Senators Specter, Lautenberg, Menendez, Casey O&M.............................. DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA, PA TO TRENTON, NJ............................................ 750,000 The President, Senators Specter, Lautenberg, Menendez O&M.............................. DENISON DAM, LAKE TEXOMA, TX............................................................... 6,393,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. DEPOE BAY, OR.............................................................................. 124,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith O&M.............................. DEQUEEN LAKE, AR........................................................................... 1,286,000 The President O&M.............................. DETROIT LAKE, OR........................................................................... 2,564,000 The President O&M.............................. DETROIT RIVER, MI.......................................................................... 5,327,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. DEWEY LAKE, KY............................................................................. 1,768,000 The President O&M.............................. DIERKS LAKE, AR............................................................................ 1,354,000 The President O&M.............................. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK...................................................................... 840,000 The President O&M.............................. DILLON LAKE, OH............................................................................ 1,454,000 The President O&M.............................. DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING, ME............................................................... 1,200,000 The President O&M.............................. DORENA LAKE, OR............................................................................ 831,000 The President O&M.............................. DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE AND CHANNEL, CA.............................................. 5,067,000 The President O&M.............................. DULUTH--SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN & WI........................................................... 4,929,000 The President O&M.............................. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID............................................................. 2,404,000 The President O&M.............................. EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA......................................................... 2,179,000 The President O&M.............................. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA.................................................................... 398,000 The President O&M.............................. EAST FORK, TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MS............................................................. 135,000 The President O&M.............................. EAST LYNN LAKE, WV......................................................................... 2,044,000 The President O&M.............................. EAST RIVER, NY............................................................................. 500,000 The President, Senator Schumer O&M.............................. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY.................................................................... 4,220,000 The President O&M.............................. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY....................................................................... 473,000 The President O&M.............................. EASTCHESTER CREEK, NY...................................................................... 180,000 The President, Senator Schumer O&M.............................. EAU GALLE RIVER LAKE, WI................................................................... 611,000 The President O&M.............................. EDIZ HOOK, WA.............................................................................. 63,000 The President O&M.............................. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH.................................................................. 514,000 The President O&M.............................. EL DORADO LAKE, KS......................................................................... 569,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. ELK CITY LAKE, KS.......................................................................... 734,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. ELKINS, WV................................................................................. 14,000 The President O&M.............................. ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY........................................................... 25,000 The President O&M.............................. ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FL............................................................ 25,000 The President O&M.............................. ESTELLINE SPRINGS EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT, TX................................................. 38,000 The President O&M.............................. EUFAULA LAKE, OK........................................................................... 5,348,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA..................................................... 1,293,000 The President, Senator Murray O&M.............................. EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA, SBC RESERVATION PLAN, FL..................................... 400,000 The President O&M.............................. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH........................................................................ 2,026,000 The President O&M.............................. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR........................................................................ 1,418,000 The President O&M.............................. FALL RIVER LAKE, KS........................................................................ 1,284,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. FALLS LAKE, NC............................................................................. 1,683,000 The President O&M.............................. FARM CREEK RESERVOIRS, IL.................................................................. 203,000 The President O&M.............................. FARMINGTON DAM, CA......................................................................... 443,000 The President O&M.............................. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR........................................................................ 1,433,000 The President O&M.............................. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL...................................................................... 2,025,000 The President O&M.............................. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM, LAKE O' THE PINES, TX................................................. 4,179,000 The President O&M.............................. FISHTRAP LAKE, KY.......................................................................... 1,830,000 The President O&M.............................. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NY................................................................. 380,000 The President, Senator Schumer O&M.............................. FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK....................................................................... 10,218,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. FORT RANDALL DAM, LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD.................................................... 7,328,000 The President O&M.............................. FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK....................................................................... 742,000 The President O&M.............................. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA............................................................... 633,000 The President O&M.............................. FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER, RI............................................................ 500,000 Senators Reed, Whitehouse O&M.............................. FOX RIVER, WI.............................................................................. 3,775,000 The President, Senator Kohl O&M.............................. FRANCIS E WALTER DAM, PA................................................................... 774,000 The President, Senator Casey O&M.............................. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI....................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH..................................................................... 619,000 The President O&M.............................. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX........................................................................ 7,020,000 The President O&M.............................. FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA....................................................................... 1,848,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. FT PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT................................................................... 4,444,000 The President O&M.............................. GALISTEO DAM, NM........................................................................... 423,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman O&M.............................. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX........................................................... 6,022,000 The President O&M.............................. GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND........................................................... 11,789,000 The President, Senator Dorgan O&M.............................. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA.......................................................... 2,022,000 The President O&M.............................. GAVINS POINT DAM, LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, NE & SD............................................ 6,518,000 The President, Hagel O&M.............................. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA................................................. 228,000 The President O&M.............................. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC...................................................................... 690,000 The President, Senator Graham O&M.............................. GILLHAM LAKE, AR........................................................................... 1,156,000 The President O&M.............................. GIWW, CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TX.............................................................. 2,706,000 The President O&M.............................. GIWW, CHOCOLATE BAYOU, TX.................................................................. 2,926,000 The President O&M.............................. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI..................................................................... 1,312,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI.................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI.............................................................. ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. GRANGER DAM AND LAKE, TX................................................................... 2,225,000 The President O&M.............................. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX......................................................................... 2,900,000 The President O&M.............................. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA........................................................ 9,180,000 The President O&M.............................. GRAYS REEF PASSAGE, MI..................................................................... 180,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. GRAYSON LAKE, KY........................................................................... 1,445,000 The President O&M.............................. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK................................................................. 256,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (new Harbor)............................................. 250,000 Senator Reed O&M.............................. GREAT SOUTH BAY, NY........................................................................ 80,000 The President O&M.............................. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY................................................................ 3,698,000 The President, Senator McConnell O&M.............................. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI....................................................................... 5,394,000 The President, Senator Kohl O&M.............................. GREEN PETER--FOSTER LAKES, OR.............................................................. 2,323,000 The President O&M.............................. GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY....................................................................... 4,942,000 The President O&M.............................. GREENS BAYOU, TX........................................................................... 850,000 The President O&M.............................. GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR...................................................................... 6,861,000 The President O&M.............................. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, AL............................................................. 5,230,000 The President, Senators Shelby, Sessions O&M.............................. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA............................................................. 17,769,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter, Wicker O&M.............................. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TX............................................................. 31,874,000 The President, Senator Hutchison O&M.............................. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS........................................................................ 10,000,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker O&M.............................. HALEIWA HARBOR, OAHU, HI................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Inouye O&M.............................. HAMPTON RDS, NORFOLK & NEWPORT NEWS HBR, VA (DRIFT REMOVAL)................................ 1,108,000 The President O&M.............................. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT..................................................................... 338,000 The President O&M.............................. HARBOR OF REFUGE, LEWES, DE................................................................ 500,000 Senators Biden, Carper O&M.............................. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, NE..................................................................... 1,786,000 The President, Senators Ben Nelson, Hagel O&M.............................. HARRY S TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, MO....................................................... 8,863,000 The President, Senator Bond O&M.............................. HARTWELL LAKE, GA & SC..................................................................... 12,188,000 The President O&M.............................. HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR......................................................... 400,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor O&M.............................. HERRING BAY AND ROCKHOLD, MD............................................................... 500,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin O&M.............................. HEYBURN LAKE, OK........................................................................... 555,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. HIDDEN DAM, HENSLEY LAKE, CA............................................................... 1,786,000 The President O&M.............................. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR....................................................................... 1,292,000 The President O&M.............................. HILLSDALE LAKE, KS......................................................................... 764,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA..................................................................... 503,000 The President O&M.............................. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI......................................................................... 588,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. HOMER HARBOR, AK........................................................................... 620,000 The President O&M.............................. HOMME LAKE, ND............................................................................. 293,000 The President, Senator Dorgan O&M.............................. HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY, MD................................................................ 500,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin O&M.............................. HOP BROOK LAKE, CT......................................................................... 919,000 The President O&M.............................. HOPKINTON--EVERETT LAKES, NH............................................................... 1,081,000 The President O&M.............................. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX....................................................................... 1,479,000 The President O&M.............................. HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA................................................................. 1,000,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX................................................................... 14,854,000 The President, Senators Hutchison, Cornyn O&M.............................. HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA...................................................................... 2,627,000 The President O&M.............................. HUDSON RIVER (MAINT), NY................................................................... 1,125,000 The President O&M.............................. HUDSON RIVER (O&C), NY..................................................................... 1,525,000 The President O&M.............................. HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, NY................................................................... 500,000 The President, Senator Schumer O&M.............................. HUGO LAKE, OK.............................................................................. 1,493,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. HULAH LAKE, OK............................................................................. 476,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CA................................................................ 5,144,000 The President, Senator Feinstein O&M.............................. HURON HARBOR, OH........................................................................... 1,530,000 The President O&M.............................. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM, WA................................................................ 4,982,000 The President O&M.............................. ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVR PORTION), IL & IN................................................... 36,287,000 The President O&M.............................. ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVS PORTION), IL & IN................................................... 1,834,000 The President O&M.............................. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, SUSSEX COUNTY, DE.............................................. 500,000 Senators Biden, Carper O&M.............................. INDIANA HARBOR, IN......................................................................... 3,138,000 The President O&M.............................. INLAND ROUTE, MI........................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, GA......................................... 63,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, IL......................................... 65,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, OR......................................... 33,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, WA......................................... 70,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AK.......................................................... 1,058,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AL.......................................................... 60,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR.......................................................... 508,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AZ.......................................................... 98,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CA.......................................................... 3,822,000 The President, Senator Feinstein O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CO.......................................................... 457,000 The President, Senator Salazar O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CT.......................................................... 316,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DC25........................................................ 62,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, FL.......................................................... 300,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, GA.......................................................... 142,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI.......................................................... 659,000 The President, Senator Inouye O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA.......................................................... 1,183,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ID.......................................................... 334,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL.......................................................... 2,342,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IN.......................................................... 635,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KS.......................................................... 177,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY.......................................................... 554,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA.......................................................... 1,814,000 The President, Senator Vitter O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MA.......................................................... 381,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MD.......................................................... 89,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ME.......................................................... 29,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MI.......................................................... 230,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MN.......................................................... 623,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO.......................................................... 1,688,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS.......................................................... 223,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MT.......................................................... 54,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NC.......................................................... 250,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ND.......................................................... 360,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NE.......................................................... 508,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NH.......................................................... 37,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NJ.......................................................... 253,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NM.......................................................... 811,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NV.......................................................... 127,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NY.......................................................... 1,031,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OH.......................................................... 452,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OK.......................................................... 177,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OR.......................................................... 413,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PA.......................................................... 592,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, RI.......................................................... 43,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SC.......................................................... 65,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SD.......................................................... 49,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN.......................................................... 85,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TX.......................................................... 1,936,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, UT.......................................................... 75,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VA.......................................................... 226,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VT.......................................................... 70,000 The President, Senator Leahy O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WA.......................................................... 623,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WI.......................................................... 125,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WV.......................................................... 255,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WY.......................................................... 34,000 The President O&M.............................. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE R TO ANCLOTE R, FL................................... 1,000,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez O&M.............................. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE R TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE.................................... 14,065,000 Mikulski, Biden, Carper, Cardin O&M.............................. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL........................................... 2,500,000 The President, Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez O&M.............................. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE.................................... 40,000 The President O&M.............................. ISABELLA LAKE, CA.......................................................................... 1,404,000 The President O&M.............................. J BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA............................................................ 10,555,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. J EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN.................................................................... 2,842,000 The President O&M.............................. J PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN....................................................... 4,602,000 The President O&M.............................. J STROM THURMOND LAKE, GA & SC............................................................. 11,066,000 The President O&M.............................. JACKSON HOLE LEVEES, WY.................................................................... 326,000 The President O&M.............................. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL.................................................................... 6,000,000 The President, Senator Martinez O&M.............................. JAMAICA BAY, NY............................................................................ 250,000 The President, Senator Schumer O&M.............................. JAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA.................................................................... 3,667,000 The President O&M.............................. JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM....................................................................... 684,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman O&M.............................. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV............................................................ 1,713,000 The President, Senator Mikulski O&M.............................. JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX....................................................................... 2,001,000 The President O&M.............................. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, LAKE SEMINOLE, FL, AL & GA...................................... 9,165,000 The President O&M.............................. JOE POOL LAKE, TX.......................................................................... 1,771,000 The President O&M.............................. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA............................................................. 7,049,000 The President, Senator Murray O&M.............................. JOHN H KERR LAKE, VA & NC.................................................................. 11,571,000 The President O&M.............................. JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO.................................................................. 2,418,000 The President, Senator Salazar O&M.............................. JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS......................................................... 1,042,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. JOHN W FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA..................................................... 1,938,000 The President O&M.............................. JOHNSTOWN, PA.............................................................................. 2,255,000 The President O&M.............................. JONES INLET, NY............................................................................ 350,000 The President O&M.............................. KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV........................................................... 9,380,000 The President O&M.............................. KANOPOLIS LAKE, KS......................................................................... 1,418,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. KASKASKIA RIVER NAVIGATION, IL............................................................. 1,903,000 The President O&M.............................. KAW LAKE, OK............................................................................... 2,574,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. KENTUCKY RIVER, KY......................................................................... 10,000 The President O&M.............................. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI...................................................................... 86,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. KEYSTONE LAKE, OK.......................................................................... 6,073,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PA..................................................... 2,493,000 The President O&M.............................. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA........................................................................ 526,000 The President O&M.............................. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI.................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, MN................................................... 431,000 The President O&M.............................. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND........................................................ 1,742,000 The President, Senator Dorgan O&M.............................. LAKE KEMP, TX.............................................................................. 214,000 The President O&M.............................. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, IL................................................................ 860,000 The President O&M.............................. LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY.................................................................... 700,000 The President O&M.............................. LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA................................................................. 440,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. LAKE SHELBYVILLE, IL....................................................................... 4,761,000 The President, Senator Durbin O&M.............................. LAKE TRAVERSE, SD & MN..................................................................... 403,000 The President O&M.............................. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA............................................................. 7,554,000 The President, Senator Murray O&M.............................. LAUREL RIVER LAKE, KY...................................................................... 1,748,000 The President O&M.............................. LAVON LAKE, TX............................................................................. 3,065,000 The President O&M.............................. LELAND HARBOR, MI.......................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. LES CHENEAUX ISLAND CHANNELS, MI........................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX......................................................................... 4,110,000 The President O&M.............................. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI....................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. LIBBY DAM, LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT.............................................................. 1,712,000 The President O&M.............................. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO................................................................ 935,000 The President O&M.............................. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM, WA.............................................................. 2,360,000 The President, Senator Murray O&M.............................. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI..................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY................................................................ 10,000 The President O&M.............................. LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA....................................................................... 489,000 The President O&M.............................. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, NC.................................................................. 200,000 Senator Dole O&M.............................. LONG BRANCH LAKE, MO....................................................................... 1,100,000 The President O&M.............................. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NY...................................................... 200,000 The President O&M.............................. LONG ISLAND SOUND DMMP, CT................................................................. 1,000,000 The President O&M.............................. LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR..................................................................... 2,761,000 The President O&M.............................. LORAIN HARBOR, OH.......................................................................... 2,423,000 The President O&M.............................. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA....................................................... 3,996,000 The President O&M.............................. LOST CREEK LAKE, OR........................................................................ 3,560,000 The President O&M.............................. LOWELL CREEK TUNNEL, AK.................................................................... 500,000 Senator Stevens O&M.............................. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA............................................................. 6,874,000 The President O&M.............................. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, WA.......................................................... 4,664,000 The President, Senator Murray O&M.............................. LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA........................................................................ 2,880,000 The President O&M.............................. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID........................................................................ 1,801,000 The President O&M.............................. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI....................................................................... 442,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA........................................................................ 1,058,000 The President O&M.............................. MADISON PARISH PORT, LA.................................................................... 85,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA.................................................................... 1,823,000 The President O&M.............................. MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ........................................................................ 160,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez O&M.............................. MANATEE HARBOR, FL......................................................................... 2,675,000 The President, Senator Martinez O&M.............................. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI........................................................................ ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI...................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT.................................................................. 493,000 The President O&M.............................. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC................................................................ 4,100,000 The President, Senator Dole O&M.............................. MARINA DEL REY, CA......................................................................... 2,499,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer O&M.............................. MARION LAKE, KS............................................................................ 1,504,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI....................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY...................................................................... 1,062,000 The President O&M.............................. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, NV & CA................................................................. 737,000 The President O&M.............................. MASONBORO INLET AND CONNECTING CHANNELS, NC................................................ 365,000 The President, Senator Dole O&M.............................. MASSILLON, OH.............................................................................. 24,000 The President O&M.............................. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX................................................................. 6,173,000 The President, Senator Hutchison O&M.............................. MATTITUCK HARBOR, NY....................................................................... 20,000 The President O&M.............................. MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AR........................................ 28,395,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor O&M.............................. MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK........................................ 5,819,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. MCNARY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA............................................................... 5,183,000 The President O&M.............................. MELVERN LAKE, KS........................................................................... 2,111,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. MENOMINEE HARBOR, MI....................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA.................................................................. 239,000 The President O&M.............................. MERMENTAU RIVER, LA........................................................................ 1,969,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. MIAMI RIVER, FL............................................................................ 10,820,000 The President, Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez O&M.............................. MICHAEL J KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH..................................................... 2,023,000 The President O&M.............................. MICHIGAN HARBOR DREDGING, MI............................................................... 5,000,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ENDANGERED SPECIES COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM, NM (MRGESCP)................... 200,000 Senators Domenici Bingaman O&M.............................. MIDDLESBORO CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY..................................................... 102,000 The President O&M.............................. MILFORD LAKE, KS........................................................................... 2,133,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. MILL CREEK LAKE, WA........................................................................ 2,437,000 The President O&M.............................. MILLWOOD LAKE, AR.......................................................................... 2,074,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor O&M.............................. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI....................................................................... 650,000 The President O&M.............................. MINNESOTA RIVER, MN........................................................................ 200,000 The President O&M.............................. MISPILLION RIVER, DE....................................................................... 500,000 The President, Senators Biden, Carper O&M.............................. MISS RIVER BTWN MO RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVP PORTION), MN................................. 44,904,000 The President O&M.............................. MISS RIVER BTWN MO RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVR PORTION), IL................................. 63,207,000 The President, Senators Durbin, Harkin, Bond, Grassley O&M.............................. MISS RIVER BTWN MO RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVS PORTION), IL................................. 20,004,000 The President, Senators Bond, Grassley O&M.............................. MISS RIVER BTWN THE OHIO AND MO RIVERS (LOWER RIVER), MO................................... 25,359,000 The President, Senator Bond O&M.............................. MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN...................................................................... 1,051,000 The President O&M.............................. MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE, LA.................................................... 3,136,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO THE GULF OF MEXICO, LA................................... 55,325,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. MISSOURI RIVER--KENSLERS BEND, NE TO SIOUX CITY, IA........................................ 166,000 The President O&M.............................. MISSOURI RIVER--RULO TO MOUTH, IA, NE, KS & MO............................................. 5,106,000 The President, Senators Harkin, Bond, Grassley, Hagel O&M.............................. MISSOURI RIVER--SIOUX CITY TO RULO, IA & NE................................................ 2,560,000 The President, Senators Grassley, Hagel O&M.............................. MOBILE HARBOR, AL.......................................................................... 21,562,000 The President, Senator Shelby O&M.............................. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, CA....................................................................... 285,000 The President O&M.............................. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA...................................................................... 12,392,000 The President, Senator Casey O&M.............................. MONROE HARBOR, MI.......................................................................... 1,018,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. MONROE LAKE, IN............................................................................ 1,326,000 The President O&M.............................. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC................................................................... 5,000,000 The President, Senators Dole, Burr O&M.............................. MORICHES INLET, NY......................................................................... 2,050,000 The President, Senator Schumer O&M.............................. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA....................................................................... 1,630,000 The President O&M.............................. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH.................................................................... 1,383,000 The President O&M.............................. MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NY....................................................................... 4,839,000 The President O&M.............................. MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, MS................................................................... 160,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker O&M.............................. MT ST HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA.......................................................... 257,000 The President O&M.............................. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA....................................................................... 3,271,000 The President, Senator Murray O&M.............................. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE....................................................................... 30,000 The President O&M.............................. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI........................................................................ 350,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH.................................................................. 8,275,000 The President O&M.............................. NARRAGUAGUS RIVER, ME...................................................................... 600,000 Senators Snowe, Collins O&M.............................. NARROWS DAM, LAKE GREESON, AR.............................................................. 4,591,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor O&M.............................. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT & NY......................................................... 80,000 The President, Senator Leahy O&M.............................. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX..................................................................... 3,542,000 The President O&M.............................. NEAH BAY, WA............................................................................... 308,000 The President O&M.............................. NEW BEDFORD AND FAIRHAVEN HARBOR, MA....................................................... 250,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry O&M.............................. NEW BEDFORD FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET HURRICANE BARRIER, MA................................... 372,000 The President, Senators Kennedy, Kerry O&M.............................. NEW HOGAN LAKE, CA......................................................................... 2,115,000 The President O&M.............................. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NJ....................................................... 250,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez O&M.............................. NEW MADRID HARBOR (MILE 889), MO........................................................... 300,000 Senator Bond O&M.............................. NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO...................................................................... 400,000 The President, Senator Bond O&M.............................. NEW MELONES LAKE, DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL, CA................................................... 1,730,000 The President O&M.............................. NEW RIVER INLET, NC........................................................................ 800,000 The President, Senator Dole O&M.............................. NEW TOPSAIL INLET, NC...................................................................... 400,000 Senator Dole O&M.............................. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS, NY....................................................... 6,750,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez, Schumer O&M.............................. NEW YORK HARBOR (DRIFT REMOVAL), NY & NJ................................................... 6,300,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez, Schumer O&M.............................. NEW YORK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSIT), NY.................................... 950,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez, Schumer O&M.............................. NEW YORK HARBOR, NY........................................................................ 4,000,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez, Schumer O&M.............................. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, NJ.............................................. 300,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez, Schumer O&M.............................. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA..................................................................... 400,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry O&M.............................. NEWTOWN CREEK, NY.......................................................................... 220,000 The President, Senator Schumer O&M.............................. NIMROD LAKE, AR............................................................................ 1,609,000 The President O&M.............................. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK....................................................................... 350,000 The President O&M.............................. NOLIN LAKE, KY............................................................................. 3,337,000 The President O&M.............................. NOME HARBOR, AK............................................................................ 780,000 The President, Senator Stevens O&M.............................. NORFOLK HARBOR, VA......................................................................... 10,072,000 The President, Senators Warner, Webb O&M.............................. NORFORK LAKE, AR........................................................................... 3,920,000 The President O&M.............................. NORTH BRANCH KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH....................................................... 593,000 The President O&M.............................. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA......................................................... 656,000 The President O&M.............................. NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT.................................................................... 635,000 The President, Senator Leahy O&M.............................. NORTH SAN GABRIEL DAM AND LAKE GEORGETOWN, TX.............................................. 2,066,000 The President O&M.............................. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT................................................................. 747,000 The President, Senator Leahy O&M.............................. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT.................................................................. 385,000 The President O&M.............................. NOYO HARBOR, CA............................................................................ 750,000 Senator Feinstein O&M.............................. O C FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX................................................................ 907,000 The President O&M.............................. OAHE DAM, LAKE OAHE, SD & ND............................................................... 9,277,000 The President, Senator Dorgan O&M.............................. OAKLAND HARBOR, CA......................................................................... 7,445,000 The President O&M.............................. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD......................................... 450,000 The President, Senators Mikulski, Cardin O&M.............................. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA....................................................................... 1,620,000 The President O&M.............................. OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, KY, IL, IN & OH................................................. 39,419,000 The President O&M.............................. OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, PA, OH & WV..................................................... 24,796,000 The President O&M.............................. OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV, KY & OH..................................................... 30,292,000 The President O&M.............................. OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, KY, IL, IN & OH.............................................. 4,485,000 The President O&M.............................. OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, PA, OH & WV.................................................. 509,000 The President O&M.............................. OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, WV, KY & OH.................................................. 2,700,000 The President O&M.............................. OHIO-MISSISSIPPI FLOOD CONTROL, OH......................................................... 1,089,000 The President O&M.............................. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS......................................................................... 1,900,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker O&M.............................. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL.................................................................... 4,530,000 The President O&M.............................. OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, TN............................................................... 9,845,000 The President O&M.............................. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI....................................................................... 655,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. OOLOGAH LAKE, OK........................................................................... 1,923,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. OPTIMA LAKE, OK............................................................................ 164,000 The President O&M.............................. ORWELL LAKE, MN............................................................................ 256,000 The President O&M.............................. OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR......................................................................... 500,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor O&M.............................. OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH....................................................................... 598,000 The President O&M.............................. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR & LA......................................................... 8,509,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Lincoln, Pryor, Vitter O&M.............................. OZARK--JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM, AR........................................................ 5,287,000 The President O&M.............................. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH....................................................................... 1,307,000 The President O&M.............................. PAINTED ROCK DAM, AZ....................................................................... 1,206,000 The President O&M.............................. PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY....................................................................... 954,000 The President O&M.............................. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL...................................................................... 2,385,000 The President, Senator Martinez O&M.............................. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL..................................................................... 55,000 The President O&M.............................. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE.................................................. 531,000 The President, Hagel O&M.............................. PARISH CREEK, MD........................................................................... 500,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin O&M.............................. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS...................................................................... 7,511,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker O&M.............................. PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD WARNING SYSTEMS, NJ.................................................... 254,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez O&M.............................. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX......................................................................... 1,005,000 The President O&M.............................. PATOKA LAKE, IN............................................................................ 1,150,000 The President O&M.............................. PEARL RIVER, MS & LA....................................................................... 193,000 The President, Senator Wicker O&M.............................. PEARSON--SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS......................................................... 1,048,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL....................................................................... 67,000 The President O&M.............................. PENSACOLA RESERVOIR, LAKE OF THE CHEROKEES, OK............................................. 119,000 The President O&M.............................. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI....................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. PERRY LAKE, KS............................................................................. 2,516,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. PETERSBERG NORTH HARBOR PROJECT, AK........................................................ 500,000 Senator Stevens O&M.............................. PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI........................................................................ ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA.......................................................................... 6,961,000 The President O&M.............................. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS LAKES, NV......................................................... 204,000 The President O&M.............................. PINE CREEK LAKE, OK........................................................................ 1,099,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. PINE FLAT LAKE, CA......................................................................... 2,854,000 The President O&M.............................. PINOLE SHOAL MANAGEMENT STUDY, CA.......................................................... 500,000 Senator Feinstein O&M.............................. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND.......................................................................... 572,000 The President O&M.............................. POINT JUDITH HARBOR OF REUGE, RI........................................................... 1,250,000 The President, Senator Reed O&M.............................. POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR, MI................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. POMME DE TERRE LAKE, MO.................................................................... 2,108,000 The President O&M.............................. POMONA LAKE, KS............................................................................ 1,969,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI..................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. PORT HUENEME, CA........................................................................... 4,029,000 The President, Senator Feinstein O&M.............................. PORT ORFORD, OR............................................................................ 7,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith O&M.............................. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI.................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. PORTAGE HARBOR, MI......................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. PORTCHESTER HARBOR, NY..................................................................... 150,000 The President, Senator Schumer O&M.............................. PORTLAND HARBOR, ME........................................................................ 100,000 The President, Senators Snowe, Collins O&M.............................. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS (DRIFT REMOVAL), DC........................................... 805,000 The President O&M.............................. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI.................................................................... 312,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. PROCTOR LAKE, TX........................................................................... 2,155,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK.............................................................. 550,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AL.............................................................. 100,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AR.............................................................. 8,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CA.............................................................. 2,422,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CT.............................................................. 1,100,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DC.............................................................. 28,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DE.............................................................. 147,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, FL.............................................................. 1,265,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, GA.............................................................. 162,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, HI.............................................................. 537,000 The President, Senator Inouye O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IL.............................................................. 111,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IN.............................................................. 185,000 The President O&M.............................. Project Condition Surveys, KY.............................................................. 7,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MA.............................................................. 1,200,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MD.............................................................. 376,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, ME.............................................................. 750,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MI.............................................................. 276,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MN.............................................................. 95,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MO.............................................................. 14,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MS.............................................................. 82,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NC.............................................................. 675,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NH.............................................................. 300,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NJ.............................................................. 1,363,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez, Schumer O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NY.............................................................. 1,830,000 The President, Senator Schumer O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OH.............................................................. 295,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OR.............................................................. 220,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PA.............................................................. 70,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, RI.............................................................. 400,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, SC.............................................................. 624,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TN.............................................................. 9,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TX.............................................................. 304,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VA.............................................................. 870,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WA.............................................................. 338,000 The President O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WI.............................................................. 160,000 The President O&M.............................. PROMPTON LAKE, PA.......................................................................... 505,000 The President O&M.............................. PROVIDENCE HARBOR SHIPPING CHANNEL, RI..................................................... 300,000 Senators Reed, Whitehouse O&M.............................. PUGET SOUND AND TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA....................................................... 997,000 The President O&M.............................. PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA........................................................................... 20,000 The President O&M.............................. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA....................................................................... 1,572,000 The President O&M.............................. R D BAILEY LAKE, WV........................................................................ 2,836,000 The President O&M.............................. RARITAN RIVER TO ARTHUR KILL CUT-OFF, NJ................................................... 200,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez, Schumer O&M.............................. RARITAN RIVER, NJ.......................................................................... 220,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez, Schumer O&M.............................. RATHBUN LAKE, IA........................................................................... 2,277,000 The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley O&M.............................. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX....................................................................... 1,456,000 The President O&M.............................. RAYSTOWN LAKE, PA.......................................................................... 3,312,000 The President, Senator Specter O&M.............................. RED LAKE RESERVOIR, MN..................................................................... 84,000 The President O&M.............................. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA......................................................... 3,278,000 The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley O&M.............................. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL.............................................................. 4,420,000 The President O&M.............................. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA.............................................................. 1,500,000 The President, Senator Landrieu O&M.............................. REND LAKE, IL.............................................................................. 4,570,000 The President, Senator Durbin O&M.............................. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN.......................................... 3,170,000 The President O&M.............................. RHODES POINT TO TYLERTON, MD............................................................... 500,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin O&M.............................. RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & SC.................................................... 8,386,000 The President O&M.............................. RICHMOND HARBOR, CA........................................................................ 6,950,000 The President O&M.............................. RIO GRANDE BOSQUE REHABILITATION, NM....................................................... 4,000,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman O&M.............................. ROBERT S KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIRS, OK.............................................. 6,599,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY....................................................................... 1,605,000 The President O&M.............................. ROGUE RIVER AT GOLD BEACH, OR.............................................................. 587,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith O&M.............................. ROLLINSON CHANNEL, NC...................................................................... 300,000 The President, Senator Dole O&M.............................. ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS........................................................................ 500,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker O&M.............................. ROSEVILLE, OH.............................................................................. 35,000 The President O&M.............................. ROUGE RIVER, MI............................................................................ 1,161,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY....................................................................... 2,832,000 The President O&M.............................. ROUSH RIVER MAJOR REHAB REPORT, IN......................................................... 300,000 The President O&M.............................. RUDEE INLET, VA............................................................................ 370,000 The President, Senators Warner, Webb O&M.............................. SABINE--NECHES WATERWAY, TX................................................................ 8,822,000 The President O&M.............................. SACRAMENTO RIVER (30 FOOT PROJECT), CA..................................................... 5,582,000 The President O&M.............................. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES (DEBRIS CONTROL), CA...................................... 1,566,000 The President O&M.............................. SACRAMENTO RIVER SHALLOW DRAFT CHANNEL, CA................................................. 175,000 The President O&M.............................. SAGINAW RIVER, MI.......................................................................... 3,798,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. SALAMONIE LAKE, IN......................................................................... 1,226,000 The President O&M.............................. SALEM RIVER, NJ............................................................................ 70,000 The President, Senator Lautenberg O&M.............................. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE............................................................. 702,000 The President, Hagel O&M.............................. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX.......................................................... 5,820,000 The President O&M.............................. SAN FRANCISCO BAY LONG TERM MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, CA........................................ 1,106,000 The President, Senator Feinstein O&M.............................. SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY (DRIFT REMOVAL), CA........................................... 2,805,000 The President O&M.............................. SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA................................................................... 2,514,000 The President O&M.............................. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, PORT OF STOCKTON, CA.................................................... 5,411,000 The President, Senator Feinstein O&M.............................. SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CA................................................... 1,140,000 The President O&M.............................. SANDY HOOK BAY AT LEONARDO, NJ............................................................. 40,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez O&M.............................. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA.................................................................. 3,148,000 The President O&M.............................. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA................................................................... 2,090,000 The President O&M.............................. SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM................................................................ 940,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman O&M.............................. SARDIS LAKE, OK............................................................................ 912,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. SAUGATUCK HARBOR, MI....................................................................... ................. Senator Stabenow O&M.............................. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA........................................................................ 13,895,000 The President O&M.............................. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA........................................................... 183,000 The President O&M.............................. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA....................................................................... 3,908,000 The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AL........................................................ 94,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AZ........................................................ 39,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CA........................................................ 1,639,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CO........................................................ 720,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, FL........................................................ 30,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ID........................................................ 469,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, KS........................................................ 30,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MD........................................................ 64,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MO........................................................ 327,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MT........................................................ 88,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ND........................................................ 119,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, NM........................................................ 502,000 The President, Senators Domenici Bingaman O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OK........................................................ 520,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OR........................................................ 82,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, PA........................................................ 46,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, SD........................................................ 52,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, TX........................................................ 101,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, UT........................................................ 598,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WA........................................................ 506,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WY........................................................ 87,000 The President O&M.............................. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA....................................................................... 3,000,000 The President, Senators Specter, Casey O&M.............................. SEATTLE HARBOR, WA......................................................................... 913,000 The President O&M.............................. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI........................................................................ 75,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. SHARK RIVER, NJ............................................................................ 775,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez O&M.............................. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA.................................................................... 2,366,000 The President O&M.............................. SHINNECOCK INLET, NY....................................................................... 200,000 The President, Senator Schumer O&M.............................. SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ......................................................... 300,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez O&M.............................. SHREWSBURY RIVER, MAIN CHANNEL, NJ......................................................... 120,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez O&M.............................. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, NC..................................................................... 400,000 The President O&M.............................. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR.......................................................................... 583,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith O&M.............................. SKIATOOK LAKE, OK.......................................................................... 1,318,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR....................................................................... 5,000 The President O&M.............................. SMITHVILLE LAKE, MO........................................................................ 1,203,000 The President O&M.............................. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX........................................................................ 3,157,000 The President O&M.............................. SOURIS RIVER, ND........................................................................... 280,000 The President O&M.............................. SOUTH FLORIDA EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FL......................................... 357,000 The President O&M.............................. SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MO................................................................ 8,000 The President O&M.............................. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY............................................... 839,000 The President O&M.............................. ST CLAIR RIVER, MI......................................................................... 1,791,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. ST JOSEPH HARBOR, MI....................................................................... 595,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. ST MARYS RIVER, MI......................................................................... 18,836,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. STAMFORD HURRICANE BARRIER, CT............................................................. 374,000 The President O&M.............................. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA.................................................................... 248,000 The President O&M.............................. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX.................................................................. 2,210,000 The President O&M.............................. STILLWATER LAKE, PA........................................................................ 331,000 The President O&M.............................. STOCKTON LAKE, MO.......................................................................... 3,828,000 The President, Senator Bond O&M.............................. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV................................................................. 1,039,000 The President O&M.............................. STURGEON BAY, WI........................................................................... 16,000 The President O&M.............................. SUCCESS LAKE, CA........................................................................... 1,791,000 The President O&M.............................. SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA..................................................................... 2,982,000 The President O&M.............................. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV...................................................................... 2,044,000 The President O&M.............................. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH.................................................................... 596,000 The President O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, IL............................................... 565,000 The President O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, IN............................................... 91,000 The President O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, ME............................................... 17,000 The President O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, MI............................................... 2,444,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, MN............................................... 323,000 The President O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, ND............................................... 24,000 The President O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, NY............................................... 551,000 The President O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, OH............................................... 223,000 The President O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, PA............................................... 93,000 The President O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, WA............................................... 10,400,000 The President O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, WA............................................... 53,000 The President O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, WI............................................... 498,000 The President O&M.............................. SUTTON LAKE, WV............................................................................ 2,210,000 The President O&M.............................. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA...................................................................... 400,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell O&M.............................. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO........................................................................ 6,667,000 The President, Senator Bond O&M.............................. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA................................................................. 120,000 The President O&M.............................. TAMPA HARBOR, FL........................................................................... 4,550,000 The President, Senator Martinez O&M.............................. TANGIPAHOA RIVER, LA....................................................................... 321,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY...................................................................... 1,312,000 The President O&M.............................. TCHEFUNCTE RIVER & BOGUE FALIA, LA......................................................... 400,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK................................................................... 3,794,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. TENNESSEE RIVER, TN........................................................................ 20,219,000 The President O&M.............................. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION, AL....................................... 2,350,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Shelby, Sessions, Wicker O&M.............................. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL & MS...................................................... 22,009,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Shelby, Sessions, Wicker O&M.............................. TERMINUS DAM, LAKE KAWEAH, CA.............................................................. 1,912,000 The President O&M.............................. TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX................................................................ 1,482,000 The President, Senator Cornyn O&M.............................. TEXAS WATER ALLOCATION ASSESSMENT, TX...................................................... 1,000,000 The President, Senators Hutchison, Cornyn O&M.............................. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM, WA & OR........................................................... 7,696,000 The President O&M.............................. THOMASTON DAM, CT.......................................................................... 615,000 The President O&M.............................. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR.................................................................. 2,200,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith O&M.............................. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA.................................................................... 2,213,000 The President O&M.............................. TIONESTA LAKE, PA.......................................................................... 3,115,000 The President O&M.............................. TOLEDO HARBOR, OH.......................................................................... 4,701,000 The President, Senator Voinovich O&M.............................. TOM JENKINS DAM, OH........................................................................ 791,000 The President O&M.............................. TORONTO LAKE, KS........................................................................... 535,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. TOWN BLUFF DAM, B A STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX.................................................... 2,735,000 The President O&M.............................. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT......................................................................... 681,000 The President, Senator Leahy O&M.............................. TRINIDAD LAKE, CO.......................................................................... 1,290,000 The President, Senators Allard, Salazar O&M.............................. TULLY LAKE, MA............................................................................. 543,000 The President O&M.............................. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS...................................................................... 2,135,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE RIVER, MD.................................................... 135,000 The President, Senators Mikulski, Cardin O&M.............................. TWO HARBORS, MN............................................................................ 300,000 The President O&M.............................. TWO RIVERS DAM, NM......................................................................... 452,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman O&M.............................. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI...................................................................... 400,000 Senator Kohl O&M.............................. TYGART LAKE, WV............................................................................ 1,521,000 The President O&M.............................. UMPQUA RIVER, OR........................................................................... 635,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith O&M.............................. UNION CITY LAKE, PA........................................................................ 1,017,000 The President O&M.............................. UNION LAKE, MO............................................................................. 10,000 The President O&M.............................. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT...................................................................... 578,000 The President, Senator Leahy O&M.............................. UPPER RIO GRANDE WATER OPERATIONS MODEL STUDY, NM.......................................... 1,201,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman O&M.............................. VENTURA HARBOR, CA......................................................................... 3,095,000 The President O&M.............................. W KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, NC......................................................... 2,977,000 The President, Senator Dole O&M.............................. WACO LAKE, TX.............................................................................. 3,090,000 The President O&M.............................. WAIANAE HARBOR, HI......................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Inouye O&M.............................. WALLACE LAKE, LA........................................................................... 200,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX....................................................................... 1,747,000 The President O&M.............................. WALTER F GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL & GA...................................................... 8,417,000 The President O&M.............................. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC...................................................................... 25,000 The President O&M.............................. WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, AL...................................................... 120,000 The President O&M.............................. WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, FL...................................................... 405,000 The President O&M.............................. WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, MS...................................................... 30,000 The President O&M.............................. WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, VA...................................................... 54,000 The President O&M.............................. WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE TO THE GULF, LA....................................................... 500,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter O&M.............................. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA..................................... 500,000 The President, Senator Landrieu O&M.............................. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA, VA...................................................... 260,000 The President O&M.............................. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL........................................................................ 1,099,000 The President O&M.............................. WAURIKA LAKE, OK........................................................................... 1,093,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, OK............................................................. 4,695,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH........................................................... 865,000 The President O&M.............................. WEST HILL DAM, MA.......................................................................... 674,000 The President O&M.............................. WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, GA & AL........................................................... 7,446,000 The President O&M.............................. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT..................................................................... 568,000 The President O&M.............................. WESTCHESTER CREEK, NY...................................................................... 250,000 The President, Senator Schumer O&M.............................. WESTVILLE LAKE, MA......................................................................... 497,000 The President O&M.............................. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI...................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow O&M.............................. WHITE RIVER, AR............................................................................ 52,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor O&M.............................. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, AZ...................................................................... 171,000 The President O&M.............................. WHITNEY LAKE, TX........................................................................... 8,559,000 The President O&M.............................. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY..................................................................... 553,000 The President O&M.............................. WICOMICO RIVER, MD......................................................................... 1,400,000 The President, Senators Mikulski, Cardin O&M.............................. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR................................................... 210,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith O&M.............................. WILLAMETTE RIVER BANK PROTECTION, OR....................................................... 62,000 The President O&M.............................. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR, WA............................................................... 34,000 The President O&M.............................. WILLIAM H HARSHA LAKE, OH.................................................................. 1,837,000 The President O&M.............................. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR...................................................................... 610,000 The President O&M.............................. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE...................................................................... 3,750,000 The President, Senators Biden, Carper O&M.............................. WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC...................................................................... 13,000,000 The President, Senators Dole, Burr O&M.............................. WILSON LAKE, KS............................................................................ 1,977,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts O&M.............................. WISTER LAKE, OK............................................................................ 678,000 The President, Senator Inhofe O&M.............................. WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY........................................................ 7,834,000 The President, Senator McConnell O&M.............................. WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TN...................................................................... 107,000 The President O&M.............................. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA.................................................................... 1,033,000 The President O&M.............................. WOONSOCKET, RI............................................................................. 300,000 Senator Reed O&M.............................. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX............................................................. 4,532,000 The President O&M.............................. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR................................................................. 1,482,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith O&M.............................. YAQUINA RIVER, OR.......................................................................... 300,000 Senators Wyden, Smith O&M.............................. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY........................................................................ 1,180,000 The President O&M.............................. YAZOO RIVER, MS............................................................................ 26,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker O&M.............................. YELLOW BEND PORT, AR....................................................................... 160,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor O&M.............................. YORK INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA................................................................... 471,000 The President O&M.............................. YORK RIVER, VA............................................................................. 250,000 The President O&M.............................. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA & MD........................................................... 2,908,000 The President O&M.............................. YUBA RIVER, CA............................................................................. 129,000 The President O&M.............................. ACTIONS FOR CHANGE TO IMPROVE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.................................... 5,000,000 The President O&M.............................. AQUATIC NUISANCE CONTROL RESEARCH.......................................................... 690,000 The President O&M.............................. ASSET MANAGEMENT/FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE...................................... 4,750,000 The President O&M.............................. BUDGET/MANAGEMENT SUPPORT FOR O&M BUSINESS LINES........................................... 5,865,000 The President O&M.............................. COASTAL INLET RESEARCH PROGRAM............................................................. 2,475,000 The President O&M.............................. CULTURAL RESOURCES (NAGPRA/CURATION)....................................................... 1,500,000 The President O&M.............................. DREDGE WHEELER READY RESERVE............................................................... 12,000,000 The President O&M.............................. DREDGING DATA AND LOCK PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM....................................... 1,062,000 The President O&M.............................. DREDGING OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION (DOER)................................... 6,080,000 The President O&M.............................. DREDGING OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT PROGRAM (DOTS)....................................... 1,391,000 The President O&M.............................. EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM....................................................... 270,000 The President O&M.............................. FACILITY PROTECTION........................................................................ 12,000,000 The President O&M.............................. GREAT LAKES SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODEL....................................................... 900,000 The President O&M.............................. INDEPENDENT (PART) ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENT--STEWARDSHIP.................................. 500,000 The President O&M.............................. INLAND NAVIGATION SAFETY INITIATIVE........................................................ 3,000,000 The President O&M.............................. INLAND WATERWAY NAVIGATION CHARTS.......................................................... 3,708,000 The President O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS.............................................................. 1,780,000 The President O&M.............................. MONITORING OFCOMPLETED NAVIGATION PROJECTS................................................. 1,575,000 The President O&M.............................. NATIONAL (LEVEE) FLOOD INVENTORY........................................................... 10,000,000 The President O&M.............................. NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING................................................................... 13,900,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker O&M.............................. NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM................................................................ 15,000,000 The President O&M.............................. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (NEPP)..................................................... 6,000,000 The President O&M.............................. NATIONAL NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES........................................... 3,326,000 The President O&M.............................. NATIONAL PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT FOR REALLOCATION............................................. 300,000 The President O&M.............................. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL SUPPORT...................................................... 300,000 The President O&M.............................. PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION:.................................................................. ................. ............................................. O&M.............................. HARBOR MAINTENANCE FEE DATA COLLECTION..................................................... 725,000 The President O&M.............................. PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION--REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS........................................ 500,000 The President O&M.............................. PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION--STRAIGHTENING OF CHANNELS........................................ 50,000 The President O&M.............................. WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS............................................................. 4,271,000 The President O&M.............................. RECREATION ONE STOP (R1S) NATIONAL RECREATION RESERVATION.................................. 1,130,000 The President O&M.............................. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM....................................................... 4,500,000 The President, Senators Inouye, Lautenberg, Menendez, Schumer, Dole, Burr, Wyden, Smith, Reed, Whitehouse O&M.............................. Delaware Estuary RSM, NJ............................................................... (300,000) Senators Lautenberg, Menendez O&M.............................. Long Island Coastal Planning, NY....................................................... (500,000) Senator Schumer O&M.............................. North Carolina RSM, NC................................................................. (600,000) Senator Dole, Burr O&M.............................. South Coastal Rhode Island Regional Sediment Management Study, RI...................... (750,000) Senators Reed, Whitehouse O&M.............................. South Jetty and Clatsop Spit, OR....................................................... (500,000) Senators Wyden, Smith O&M.............................. Southeast Oahu Regional Sediment Management, HI........................................ (500,000) Senators Inouye, Akaka O&M.............................. RELIABILITY MODELS PROGRAM FOR MAJOR REHAB................................................. 608,000 The President O&M.............................. WATER OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT (WOTS).................................................. 653,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... AK CHIN WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT PROJECT, AZ............................................ 9,900,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... ALBUQUERQUE METRO AREA WATER RECYCLING AND REUSE, NM....................................... 1,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman Water and Related Resources...... ANIMAS-LA PLATA PROJECT, CRSP, CO, NM, AZ.................................................. 50,000,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Allard, Salazar Water and Related Resources...... ARBUCKLE PROJECT, OK....................................................................... 289,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT........................................................ 1,000,000 Senator Kyl Water and Related Resources...... BALMORHEA PROJECT, TX...................................................................... 58,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... BOISE AREA PROJECTS, ID.................................................................... 5,284,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... BURNT, MALHEUR, OWYHEE, AND POWER RIVER BASIN WATER OPTIMIZATION FEASIBILITY STUDY, OR..... 300,000 Senators Wyden, Smith Water and Related Resources...... CACHUMA PROJECT, CA........................................................................ 2,118,000 The President, Senator Feinstein Water and Related Resources...... CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.......................................................... 352,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... CALLEGUAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RECYCLING PLANT, CA..................................... 1,500,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer Water and Related Resources...... CANADIAN RIVER PROJECT, TX................................................................. 145,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... CARLSBAD PROJECT, NM....................................................................... 3,784,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman Water and Related Resources...... CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT, COLORADO RIVER BASIN.............................................. 28,350,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Kyl, Bingaman Water and Related Resources...... CENTRAL OKLAHOMA MASTER CONSERVATORY DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY............................ 250,000 Senator Inhofe Water and Related Resources...... CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECTS, CA................................................................ ................. ............................................. Water and Related Resources...... AMERICAN RIVER DIVISION................................................................ 9,480,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... AUBURN-FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT............................................................... 2,088,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... DELTA DIVISION......................................................................... 20,737,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... EAST SIDE DIVISION..................................................................... 4,534,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... FRIANT DIVISION........................................................................ 7,721,000 The President, Senator Feinstein Water and Related Resources...... MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT PROGRAMS......................................................... 17,151,000 The President, Senator Feinstein Water and Related Resources...... REPLACEMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND EXTRAORDINARY MAINT....................................... 24,091,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SACRAMENTO RIVER DIVISION.............................................................. 9,428,000 The President, Senator Feinstein Water and Related Resources...... SAN FELIPE DIVISION.................................................................... 775,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION................................................................... 391,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SHASTA DIVISION........................................................................ 7,914,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... TRINITY RIVER DIVISION................................................................. 10,917,000 The President, Senator Feinstein Water and Related Resources...... WATER AND POWER OPERATIONS............................................................. 9,451,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... WEST SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION, SAN LUIS UNIT............................................... 8,919,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... YIELD FEASIBILITY INVESTIGATION........................................................ 303,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... COLLBRAN PROJECT, CO....................................................................... 1,556,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... COLORADO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................................ 204,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... COLORADO RIVER FRONT WORK AND LEVEE SYSTEM................................................. 2,350,000 The President, Senator Feinstein Water and Related Resources...... COLORADO--BIG THOMPSON PROJECT, CO......................................................... 13,292,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVER SALMON RECOVERY PROJECT, ID, OR, WA............................... 18,000,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... COLUMBIA BASIN PROJECT, WA................................................................. 13,548,000 The President, Senator Murray Water and Related Resources...... CROOKED RIVER PROJECT, OR.................................................................. 851,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... DESCHUTES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT, OR................................................ 300,000 Senators Wyden, Smith Water and Related Resources...... DESCHUTES PROJECT, OR...................................................................... 1,166,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith Water and Related Resources...... EASTERN NEW MEXICO RURAL WATER SUPPLY...................................................... 500,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman Water and Related Resources...... EASTERN OREGON PROJECTS.................................................................... 828,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... FORT PECK RESERVATION/DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER SYSTEM, MT................................... 15,000,000 Senators Baucus, Tester Water and Related Resources...... FRUITGROWERS DAM PROJECT, CO............................................................... 229,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT, CO............................................................. 8,295,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... GRAND VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II, CO.................................................... 1,445,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... HALFWAY WASH PROJECT STUDY, NV............................................................. 200,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... HUNGRY HORSE PROJECT, MT................................................................... 653,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... HUNTLEY PROJECT, MT........................................................................ 160,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... HYRUM PROJECT, UT.......................................................................... 178,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... IDAHO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................................... 179,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL WATER RECYCLING PROJECT, CA......................................... 1,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer Water and Related Resources...... IRVINE BASIN GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IMPROVEMENT, CA...................................... 1,000,000 Senator Feinstein Water and Related Resources...... JICARILLA APACHE RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM, NM........................................ 1,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman Water and Related Resources...... KANSAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.............................................................. 73,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts Water and Related Resources...... KENDRICK PROJECT, WY....................................................................... 3,333,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... KLAMATH PROJECT, OR, CA.................................................................... 25,000,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... LAHONTAN BASIN PROJECT, NV................................................................. 10,205,000 The President, Senator Reid Water and Related Resources...... LAKE MEAD/LAS VEGAS WASH PROGRAM, NV....................................................... 2,725,000 The President, Senators Reid, Ensign Water and Related Resources...... LAKE TAHOE REGIONAL WETLANDSCA, NV......................................................... 100,000 The President, Senator Reid Water and Related Resources...... LEADVILLE/ARKANSAS RIVER RECOVERY, CO...................................................... 3,095,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... LEWIS AND CLARK RURAL WATER SYSTEM, SD, IA, MN............................................. 30,000,000 Senators Johnson; Harkin; Grassley; Coleman, Klobuchar; Thune Water and Related Resources...... LEWISTON ORCHARDS PROJECTS................................................................. 578,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... LONG BEACH AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROJECT, CA.................................... 692,000 The President, Senator Feinstein Water and Related Resources...... LONG BEACH DESALINATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, CA....................................... 1,000,000 Senator Feinstein Water and Related Resources...... LOWER COLORADO RIVER INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM, CO............................................ 243,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WATER RESOURCES, TX................................................ 4,050,000 The President, Senator Hutchison Water and Related Resources...... LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT, MT.............................................................. 46,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... MANCOS PROJECT, CO......................................................................... 146,000 The President, Senators Allard, Salazar Water and Related Resources...... MCGEE CREEK PROJECT, OK.................................................................... 676,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... MID-DAKOTA RURAL WATER PROJECT, SD......................................................... 15,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... MIDDLE RIO GRANDE PROJECT, NM.............................................................. 25,700,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman Water and Related Resources...... MILK RIVER PROJECT, MT..................................................................... 1,648,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... MINIDOKA AREA PROJECTS, ID................................................................. 5,558,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... MIRAGE FLATS PROJECT, NE................................................................... 170,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... MNI WICONI PROJECT, SD..................................................................... 37,182,000 The President, Senators Johnson, Thune Water and Related Resources...... MONTANA INVESTIGATIONS..................................................................... 134,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... MOON LAKE PROJECT, UT...................................................................... 76,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... MOUNTAIN PARK PROJECT, OK.................................................................. 523,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... NAVAJO NATION INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM, NM................................................... 77,000 The President, Senators Domenici Water and Related Resources...... NAVAJO-GALLUP WATER SUPPLY, NM, UT, CO..................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman Water and Related Resources...... NEBRASKA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................................ 64,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... NEWTON PROJECT, UT......................................................................... 42,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... NORMAN PROJECT, OK......................................................................... 473,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... NORTH LAS VEGAS WATER REUSE, NV............................................................ 3,000,000 Senators Reid, Ensign Water and Related Resources...... NORTH PLATTE PROJECT, WY................................................................... 1,880,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... NORTHERN ARIZONA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.................................................... 320,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... NORTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM....................................................... 456,000 The President, Senator Bennett Water and Related Resources...... NUECES RIVER PROJECT, TX................................................................... 558,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... ODESSA SUBAREA SPECIAL STUDY, WA........................................................... 1,000,000 The President, Senator Murray Water and Related Resources...... OGDEN RIVER PROJECT, UT.................................................................... 368,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... OKLAHOMA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................................ 128,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL WATER RECLAMATION PROJECT, CA....................................... 558,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... OREGON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.............................................................. 444,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith Water and Related Resources...... ORLAND PROJECT, CA......................................................................... 703,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... PARADOX VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II, CO.................................................. 2,416,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... PARK CITY FEASIBILLTY STUDY, UT............................................................ 500,000 Senator Bennett Water and Related Resources...... PECOS RIVER BASIN WATER SALVAGE PROJECT, NM................................................ 203,000 The President, Senators Domenici Water and Related Resources...... PERKINS COUNTY RURAL WATER SYSTEM, SD...................................................... 2,000,000 Senators Johnson, Thune Water and Related Resources...... PHOENIX METROPOLITAN WATER REUSE PROJECT, AZ............................................... 200,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN--GARRISON DIVERSION, ND.......................................... 69,986,000 The President, Senator Dorgan Water and Related Resources...... PINE RIVER PROJECT, CO..................................................................... 335,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... PROVO RIVER PROJECT, UT.................................................................... 1,366,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... RAPID VALLEY PROJECT, DEERFIELD DAM, SD.................................................... 86,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... RIO GRANDE PROJECT, NM..................................................................... 4,342,000 The President, Senators Domenici Water and Related Resources...... ROCKY BOYS/NORTH CENTRAL MONTANA RURAL WATER SYSTEM........................................ 10,000,000 Senators Baucus, Tester Water and Related Resources...... ROGUE RIVER BASIN PROJECT, TALENT DIVISION, OR............................................. 902,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SALT RIVER PROJECT, AZ..................................................................... 600,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SALTON SEA RESEARCH PROJECT, CA............................................................ 700,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SAN ANGELO PROJECT, TX..................................................................... 402,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE WATER SETTLEMENT ACT, AZ........................................... 325,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SAN DIEGO AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM, CA..................................... 3,000,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SAN GABRIEL BASIN PROJECT, CA.............................................................. 700,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SAN JOSE AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM, CA...................................... 250,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM, NM............................................ 59,000 The President, Senators Domenici Water and Related Resources...... SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT, CO................................................................ 4,637,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SAVAGE RAPIDS DAM REMOVAL, OR.............................................................. 3,000,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith Water and Related Resources...... SCOFIELD PROJECT, UT....................................................................... 133,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SHOSHONE PROJECT, WY....................................................................... 749,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SOLANO PROJECT, CA......................................................................... 4,489,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SOUTH/CENTRAL ARIZONA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................... 718,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SOUTHERN ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT PROJECT....................................... 2,969,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................................. 260,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO/WEST TEXAS INV. PROGRAM................................................ 57,000 The President, Senators Domenici Water and Related Resources...... SOUTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM....................................................... 121,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... STRAWBERRY VALLEY PROJECT, UT.............................................................. 223,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SUN RIVER PROJECT, MT...................................................................... 350,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... TEXAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................................... 146,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... TUALATIN BASIN WATER SUPPLY PROJECT, OR.................................................... 400,000 Senators Wyden, Smith Water and Related Resources...... TUALATIN PROJECT, OR....................................................................... 381,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... TUALATIN PROJECT TITLE TRANSFER AND FACILITY ASSESSMENT STUDY, OR.......................... 106,000 Senators Wyden, Smith Water and Related Resources...... TUCUMCARI PROJECT, NM...................................................................... 58,000 The President, Senators Domenici Water and Related Resources...... UMATILLA PROJECT, OR....................................................................... 3,932,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... UNCOMPAHGRE PROJECT, CO.................................................................... 264,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... UPPER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS, CO........................................................ 250,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... UPPER RIO GRANDE BASIN INVESTIGATIONS, NM.................................................. 29,000 The President, Senators Domenici Water and Related Resources...... VENTURA RIVER PROJECT, CA.................................................................. 420,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... W.C. AUSTIN PROJECT, OK.................................................................... 481,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... WASHINGTON AREA PROJECTS................................................................... 95,000 The President, Senator Murray Water and Related Resources...... WASHINGTON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.......................................................... 145,000 The President, Senator Murray Water and Related Resources...... WASHITA BASIN PROJECT, OK.................................................................. 1,426,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... WEBER BASIN PROJECT, UT.................................................................... 1,748,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... WEBER RIVER PROJECT, UT.................................................................... 137,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... WICHITA PROJECT--EQUUS BEDS DIVISION, KS................................................... 1,050,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts Water and Related Resources...... WICHITA-CHENEY PROJECT, KS................................................................. 385,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts Water and Related Resources...... WYOMING INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................................. 26,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... YAKIMA PROJECT, WA......................................................................... 8,500,000 The President, Senator Murray Water and Related Resources...... YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER ENHANCEMENT PROJECT, WA........................................... 8,503,000 The President, Senator Murray Water and Related Resources...... YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER STORAGE PROJECT, WA............................................... 500,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell Water and Related Resources...... YUMA AREA PROJECTS, AZ..................................................................... 21,863,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... YUMA EAST WETLANDS, AZ..................................................................... 1,500,000 Senator Kyl Water and Related Resources...... COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL, TITLE I............................................. 9,444,000 The President, Senator Kyl Water and Related Resources...... COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL, TITLE II............................................ 5,850,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... COLORADO RIVER STORAGE, SECTION 5.......................................................... 5,913,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... COLORADO RIVER STORAGE, SECTION 8.......................................................... 710,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... COLORADO RIVER WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM........................................... 265,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... DAM SAFETY PROGRAM:........................................................................ ................. ............................................. Water and Related Resources...... DEPARTMENT DAM SAFETY PROGRAM.......................................................... 1,250,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... INITIATE SOD CORRECTIVE ACTION......................................................... 71,500,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SAFETY OF EVALUATION OF EXISTING DAMS.................................................. 18,500,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... DROUGHT EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM....................................................... 500,000 The President, Senator Inouye Water and Related Resources...... EMERGENCY PLANNING & DISASTER RESPONSE PROGRAM............................................. 1,422,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION................................................. 21,939,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bennett, Salazar, Bingaman, Hatch Water and Related Resources...... ENVIRONMENTAL & INTERAGENCY COORDINATION ACTIVITIES........................................ 1,739,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION....................................................... 973,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... EXAMINATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES......................................................... 6,254,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... FEDERAL BUILDING SEISMIC SAFETY PROGRAM.................................................... 1,384,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... GENERAL PLANNING STUDIES................................................................... 2,163,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... LAND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.......................................................... 7,481,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... LOWER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM.................................................... 16,400,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... MISCELLANEOUS FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS..................................................... 714,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... NATIVE AMERICAN AFFAIRS PROGRAM............................................................ 7,020,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... NEGOTIATION & ADMINISTRATION OF WATER MARKETING............................................ 1,658,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... OPERATIONS AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.......................................................... 1,206,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN.................................................................. 40,740,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... POWER PROGRAM SERVICES..................................................................... 1,097,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... PUBLIC ACCESS AND SAFETY PROGRAM........................................................... 796,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... RECLAMATION LAW ADMINISTRATION............................................................. 2,132,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... RECLAMATION RECREATION MANAGEMENT (TITLE XXVII)............................................ 1,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman Water and Related Resources...... RECREATION & FISH & WILDLIFE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION........................................ 951,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT................................................................... ................. ............................................. Water and Related Resources...... DESALINATION AND WATER PURIFICATION PROGRAM................................................ 3,975,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman Water and Related Resources...... SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM............................................................. 9,000,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... RURAL WATER LEGISLATION TITLE I............................................................ 1,000,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... SITE SECURITY.............................................................................. 28,950,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... TITLE XVI WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM.............................................. 3,300,000 The President, Senators Reid, Domenici Water and Related Resources...... UNITED STATES/MEXICO BORDER ISSUES--TECHNICAL SUPPORT...................................... 93,000 The President Water and Related Resources...... WATER FOR AMERICA INITIATIVE............................................................... 19,000,000 The President, Senators Reid; Domenici, Bingaman California Bay-Delta Restoration. California Bay-Delta Restoration, CA....................................................... 42,000,000 The President, Senator Feinstein CUPCA............................ Central Utah Project Completion Act, UT.................................................... 42,000,000 The President CVPRF............................ Central Valley Project Restoration Fund, CA................................................ 56,079,000 The President, Senator Feinstein DOE--EERC........................ Algal-Base Renewable Energy for Nevada, Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV for the 750,000 Senator Reid development of algal-based energy system. DOE--EERE........................ Alternative Energy for Higher Education, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, for a solar 1,200,000 Senators Nelson (Ben), Hagel energy project. DOE--EERE........................ Alternative Energy School of the Future, Clark County, Andre Agassi Charitable Foundation, 1,250,000 Senator Reid Las Vegas, NV, for a solar fuel cell system. DOE--EERE........................ Alternative Fuel Cell Membranes for National Energy Independence, University of Southern 1,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker Mississippi, USM, MS, for advanced fuel cell membrane research. DOE--EERE........................ Anaerobic Digester and Combined Heat Power Project, Washington Suburban Sanitary 600,000 Senator Cardin Commission, Montgomery and Prince George's Counties, MD, for a study on anaerobic power generation. DOE--EERE........................ Bioenergy and Bioproducts Laboratory, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, to conduct research on 1,000,000 Senators Shelby, Sessions biofuel conversion, biofuel testing, and certification. DOE--EERE........................ Bioenergy Demonstration Project: Value-Added Products from Renewable Fuels, University of 2,000,000 Senators Nelson (Ben), Hagel Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, for research on the byproducts of biofuel production. DOE--EERE........................ Biogas Center of Excellence, Michigan Economic Development Corporation, Flint, MI, for a 1,000,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow center for the production of biogas. DOE--EERE........................ Biomass Energy Resources Center, Biomass Energy Resource Center, Montpelier, VT, for the 1,500,000 Senator Leahy installation of new small scale technology. DOE--EERE........................ Biomass Gasification Research and Development Project, Port of Benton, Richland, WA, for 1,000,000 Senator Murray the gasification and research of biomass. DOE--EERE........................ Biorefinery for Ethanol, Chemicals, Animal Feed and Biomaterials from Sugarcane Bagasse, 1,000,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, for a biomass conversion project. DOE--EERE........................ Bipolar Wafer Cell NiMH Lithium Ion Battery, Electro Energy, Danbury, CT, to advance wafer 2,000,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman cell battery technology. DOE--EERC........................ Carbon Neutral Green Campus, Nevada State College, Clark County, NV for environmental 250,000 Senator Reid sustainability. DOE--EERE........................ Center for Biomass Utilization, University of North Dakota Energy and Environmental 2,000,000 Senator Dorgan Research Center, Grand Forks, ND, for research on biomass production and its byproducts. DOE--EERE........................ Center for Nanoscale Energy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, for nanomaterials 5,000,000 Senator Dorgan research. DOE--EERE........................ Central Vermont Recovered Biomass Facility, Vermont Sustainable Jobs Fund, Montpelier, VT, 1,000,000 Senator Leahy for a digester system. DOE--EERE........................ Chariton Valley Densification--Phase II, Chariton Valley RC&D, Inc, Centerville, IA, for 1,000,000 Senator Harkin research on switchgrass. DOE--EERE........................ Christmas Valley Renewable Energy Development, Oregon Department of Energy, Salem, OR, for 400,000 Senators Wyden, Smith the development of a renewable energy-producing facility. DOE--EERE........................ City of Miami Green Initiative, City of Miami, Miami, FL, to reduce greenhouse gas 1,000,000 Senator Nelson (Bill) emissions and fuel consumption in the city. DOE--EERE........................ Clean Power Energy Research Consortium, Nicholls State University, Louisiana State 2,000,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter University, University of New Orleans, Tulane University, Southern University, University of Louisiana, Thibodeaux, LA, for a joint venture of Lousiana universities to promote alternative fuels. DOE--EERE........................ Clean Technology Commercialization Initiative, Ben Franklin Technology Partners, 1,000,000 Senators Specter, Casey Harrisburg, PA, to support clean and alternative energy technologies. DOE--EERE........................ Coastal Ohio Wind Project, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, for wind 1,000,000 Senators Brown, Voinovich energy research. DOE--EERE........................ Consortium for Plant Biotechnology Research, The Consortium for Plant Biotechnology 1,000,000 Senators Brown, Dorgan, Harkin, Inouye, Research, Inc., St. Simons Island, N/A, to support university-industry research and Johnson, Klobuchar, Landrieu, Levin, Ben technology transfer projects. Nelson, Murray, Stabenow, McConnell, Chambliss DOE--EERE........................ Cooling Heating and Power and Bio-Fuel Application Center, Mississippi State University, 2,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker Mississippi State, MS, to conduct research on increased energy efficiency through the use of electric and thermal delivery systems. DOE--EERC........................ Development of Biofuels Using Ionic Transfer Membranes, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 600,000 Senator Reid Clark County, NV for biofuels research. DOE--EERE........................ Development of High Yield Tropical Feedstocks, University of Hawaii, College of Tropical 1,500,000 Senator Inouye Agriculture and Human Resources, Honolulu, HI, for a tropical bioenergy project. DOE--EERE........................ Dueco Plug-In Hybrid Engines, Dueco Inc., Waukesha, WI, for new plug-in hybrid electric 2,000,000 Senator Kohl propulsion technology. DOE--EERE........................ Energy Production Through Anaerobic Digestion, New Jersey Department of Agriculture, 500,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Trenton, NJ, for anaerobic digester technology. DOE--EERE........................ Fluid Flow Optimization of Aerogel Blanket Manufacturing Process, Aspen Aerogels, 1,500,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry Northborough, MA, for energy-efficient insulation research. DOE--EERE........................ Forestry biofuel statewide Collaboration Center, Michigan Economic Development Corporation, 1,500,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow Upper Peninsula, MI, to improve the supply chain for woody biomass. DOE--EERE........................ Genetic Improvements of Switchgrass, University of Rhode Island at Kingston, Kingston, RI, 1,500,000 Senator Reed to improve switchgrass for use as a biofuel. DOE--EERE........................ Geothermal Power Generation Plant, Oregon Institute of Technology (OIT), Klamath Falls, OR, 1,600,000 Senators Wyden, Smith for a geothermal power plant. DOE--EERE........................ Great Basin Center for Geothermal Energy, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, to continue and 650,000 Senator Reid expand the Center's activities in promoting geothermal power. DOE--EERE........................ Great Plains Wind Power Test Facility, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, for the testing, 2,000,000 Senator Hutchison characterization, and improvement of grid-connected wind turbines and wind-driven water desalination systems. DOE--EERE........................ Hawaii-New Mexico Sustainable Energy Security Partnership, Hawaii Natural Energy Institute, 3,000,000 Senators Inouye, Domenici, Akaka Honolulu, HI, to continue the analysis and technology efforts of the Partnership. DOE--EERC........................ Hollow Glass Microspheres, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Clark County, NV for hydrogen 550,000 Senator Reid storage methods research. DOE--EERE........................ Hydroelectric Power Generation, Quincy, City of Quincy, Quincy, IL, for Quincy's efforts to 500,000 Senator Durbin install hydroelectric plants at locks and dams. DOE--EERE........................ Hydrogen Storage System for Vehicular Propulsion, Delaware State U., Dover, Delaware State 1,500,000 Senators Biden, Carper University, Dover, DE, to develop a hydrogen storage system. DOE--EERE........................ Integrated Solar Energy Windows, PPG Industries, Pittsburgh, PA, for the development of 1,000,000 Senator Specter next generation, transparent photovoltaic (PV) solar cells. DOE--EERE........................ Integrated Sustainability Initiative, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, to promote campus 1,000,000 Senator Reid sustainabil- ity. DOE--EERE........................ Kansas Biofuels Certification Laboratory, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, for analysis 1,000,000 Senator Brownback of biofuels, measuring emissions of biofuels, and research of biofuel cells. DOE--EERE........................ La Samilla Solar Trough Storage Project, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, for 2,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman solar trough storage advancement. DOE--EERE........................ Landfill Gas Utilization Plant, County of Chautauqua, Chautauqua County, NY, for landfill- 2,000,000 Senator Schumer gas power generation. DOE--EERE........................ Lightweight Composites for Heavy-Duty Vehicles and Hydrogen Storage, West Virginia 500,000 Senator Byrd University, Morgantown, WV, to advance the use of lightweight composite materials for vehicles. DOE--EERE........................ Maine Tidal Power Initiative, University of Maine, Orono, ME, to develop protocols that 1,000,000 Senators Snowe, Collins allow locations in northern New England to be prioritized for tidal energy development. DOE--EERE........................ MidSouth/Southeast Bioenergy Consortium, MidSouth/Southeast Bioenergy Consortium, 1,500,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor, Chambliss Fayetteville, AR, for research on the byproducts of biofuel production. DOE--EERE........................ Multifunctional Solar Energy Systems Research, Utah State University, Logan, UT, for 1,000,000 Senator Bennett research and development of multifunctional electricity-producing systems. DOE--EERE........................ National Agriculture-Based Industrial Lubricants (NABL), Biomass (IA), University of 600,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA, for the advancement of biobased industrial and automotive lubricants and for biofuels services. DOE--EERE........................ National Center for Commercialization of Bioenergy, Kansas State University, Olathe, KS, 750,000 Senator Roberts for the commercialization of near market bioenergy technologies to meet national renewable fuel mandates. DOE--EERE........................ National Wind Energy Center, University of Houston, Houston, TX, to focus on developing 2,000,000 Senator Hutchison advanced offshore wind technology for cost-effective, renewable clean energy production. DOE--EERC........................ Nevada Institute for Renewable Energy Commercialization, Incline Village, NV, for the 500,000 Senator Reid promotion of renewable energy in business. DOE--EERE........................ New School Green Building, The New School, New York, NY, for an environmentaly-friendly 2,000,000 Senator Schumer school facility. DOE--EERE........................ North Carolina Center for Automotive Research, North Carolina Center for Automotive 1,000,000 Senator Dole Research, Jackson, NC, to equip the Chassis Dynamics Laboratory. DOE--EERE........................ Offshore Renewable Energy, Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council, Wakefield, 700,000 Senators Reed, Whitehouse RI, to develop an Ocean Special Area Management Plan. DOE--EERE........................ Ohio Advanced Energy Manufacturing Center (OAEMC), Edison Welding Institute, Columbus, OH, 1,000,000 Senators Brown, Voinovich for an advanced energy manufacturing program. DOE--EERE........................ Oregon Solar Highway, Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, OR, to demonstrate the 1,000,000 Senators Smith, Wyden feasibility of large-scale deployment of solar photovoltaic technology. DOE--EERE........................ Pecos Valley Biomass Energy Project, NM, Clark County School District, Roswell, NM, for a 2,500,000 Senators Bingaman, Domenici bio-methane gas system. DOE--EERE........................ Placer County Biomass Utilization Pilot Project, Placer County, Auburn, CA, for a biomass 1,500,000 Senator Feinstein facility. DOE--EERE........................ Pope/Douglas Third Combuster Expansion, Pope/Douglas Solid Waste Management, Alexandria, 1,000,000 Senators Coleman, Klobuchar MN, to increase waste to energy capacity. DOE--EERE........................ Power Grid Reliability and Security, Washington State University, Washington State 1,000,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell University, Pullman, WA, to create solutions for grid reliability and security enhancements. DOE--EERE........................ Renewable Energy Clean Air Project, County of Koochiching, International Falls, MN, for syn- 700,000 Senator Klobuchar gas energy production. DOE--EERE........................ Renewable Energy Development Venture, Pacific International Center for High Technology 2,500,000 Senator Inouye Research, Honolulu, HI, to expand potential energy resources in the State of Hawaii. DOE--EERE........................ Renewable Energy Feasibility Study, City of Trenton, Trenton, NJ, to examine possible 500,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez renewable energy sources. DOE--EERE........................ Renewable Energy Integration and Development, Clark and Washoe Counties, Nevada System of 2,000,000 Senator Reid Higher Education (NSHE), Las Vegas, NV, for a renewable energy center. DOE--EERE........................ Renewable/Sustainable Biomass Project, Alaska Village Initiatives, Alaska, AK, for use of 500,000 Senator Stevens biomass for energy generation in rural Alaska villages. DOE--EERE........................ Sandia National Lab Concentrating Solar, Sandia National Lab, Albuquerque, NM, for 3,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman concentrating solar activities. DOE--EERE........................ Solar Panels and Environmental Education, County of Essex, Newark, NJ, for the installation 1,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez of solar panels to further environmental education. DOE--EERE........................ Solar Park Pilot Project, City of St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, FL, to develop a 1,000,000 Senator Nelson (Bill) renewable energy plan for the City's parks. DOE--EERE........................ Solar Power Generation, Township of Cherry Hill, Cherry Hill, NJ, for solar technology..... 300,000 Senator Lautenberg DOE--EERE........................ Solar Thermal Demonstration Project, Clark County School District, Clark County, NV, for 1,250,000 Senator Reid solar technology for schools. DOE--EERE........................ Southern Regional Center for Lightweight Innovative Design, Mississippi State University, 4,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker Mississippi State, MS, to reduce emissions and posture the US for less reliance on foreign oil. DOE--EERE........................ Southwest Alaska Regional Geothermal Energy Project, Naknek Electrical Association, Naknek, 3,000,000 Senators Stevens, Murkowski AK, for an exploratory well for a 25MW geothermal plant to serve villages in rural Alaska. DOE--EERE........................ Stamford Waste-to-Energy Project (CT), City of Stamford, Stamford, CT, to convert dried 2,000,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman sludge into clean, renewable energy. DOE--EERE........................ Strategic Biomass Initiative, Mississippi Technology Alliance, Jackson, MS, to encourage 500,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker bioenergy industry in the southeast. DOE--EERE........................ Sun Grant Initiative, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, for regional biomass 4,000,000 Senators Johnson, Thune feedstock research and education. DOE--EERE........................ Sustainable Energy for Homes and Businesses, Vermont Department of Public Service, 750,000 Senator Sanders Montpelier, VT, to support Vermont's wind and solar program. DOE--EERE........................ Sustainable Energy for Vermont Schools Competition, Vermont Superintendents Association, 900,000 Senator Sanders Montpelier, VT, for school-based projects to highlight sustainable energy technologies. DOE--EERE........................ Sustainable Energy Research Center, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, to 10,500,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker develop new engineering and scientific knowledge and serve as a catalyst to create sustainable energy industries in the southeastern United States. DOE--EERC........................ Sustainable Las Vegas, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Clark County, NV to increase 1,000,000 Senator Reid conservation and sustainability in Las Vegas. DOE--EERE........................ The Institute for Energy, Environment and Sustainability, Johnson County Community College, 750,000 Senator Brownback Overland Park, KS, to serve as a resource for local education, business and civic entities and would include education and training in renewable energy. DOE--EERE........................ Thin Film Photovoltaic Research & Development, Omega Optical, Brattleboro, VT, to research 1,000,000 Senator Leahy solar panel technology. DOE--EERE........................ Tidal Energy Study, Snohomish County PUD No. 1, Everett, WA, for environmental studies of 500,000 Senator Murray possible tidal energy pilot plants. DOE--EERE........................ Transportable Emissions Testing Lab, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, for mobile 1,000,000 Senator Byrd labs that test bus emissions. DOE--EERE........................ USD Catalysis Group for Alternative Energy, South Dakota Catalysis Group, Vermilion, SD, 1,100,000 Senators Johnson, Thune for the development of metal oxide and carbon catalyzed reactions technologies. DOE--EERE........................ Vermont Biofuels Initiative, Vermont Sustainable Jobs Fund, Montpelier, VT, to test the 1,500,000 Senator Leahy feasibility of different uses of biodiesel. DOE--EERE........................ Wind Turbine Model and Pilot Project for Alternative Energy, University of Delaware, 1,500,000 Senators Biden, Carper Newark, DE, for a shore-side wind turbine. DOE--EM DEFENSE.................. Characteristics and Clean-up of US Nuclear Legacy, Institute for Clean Energy Technology, 4,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker Mississippi State, MS, for renewal of the cooperative agreement with the DOE to help expedite the cleanup of the nuclear defense sites. DOE--EM DEFENSE.................. Water Resources Data, Modeling, and Visualization Center, Desert Research Institute, Washoe 1,000,000 Senator Reid County, NV for water research. DOE--EM DEFENSE.................. WIPP Records Archive, WIPP, Carlsbad, NM, for records archiving............................ 4,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman DOE--EM NON-DEFENSE.............. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Initiative, The University of Louisville, 1,000,000 Senator McConnell Louisville, KY, to provide data management support for research in genomics and metabolomic programs. DOE--EM NON-DEFENSE.............. Southwest Experimental Fast Oxide Reactor Decommissioning (SEFOR), University of Arkansas 2,000,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor in Fayetteville, Fayetteville, AR, for the decommissioning of SEFOR in Strickler, AR. DOE--FE.......................... Arctic Energy Office, Arctic Energy Office, Fairbanks, AK, for research in fossil energy, 6,000,000 Senator Stevens natural gas technologies, and oil technologies. DOE--FE.......................... Center for Zero Emissions Research and Technology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, 4,500,000 Senators Baucus, Tester for research related to carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emissions, and clean power generation. DOE--FE.......................... CO2 Capture/Sequestration Research, Pennsylvania State University, Centre County, PA, to 500,000 Senator Casey study carbon capture and sequestration. DOE--FE.......................... Fossil Fuel Research & Development, University of North Dakota Energy and Environmental 4,000,000 Senator Dorgan Research Center, Grand Forks, ND, to address strategic national energy issues. DOE--FE.......................... Gulf Of Mexico Hydrates Research Consortium, University of Mississippi, University of 1,200,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker Mississippi, MS, to develop and deploy an integrated multi-sensor station on the seafloor in the Gulf of Mexico. DOE--FE.......................... Long Term Environmental and Economic Impacts of the Development of a Coal Liquefaction 500,000 Senator Byrd Sector in China, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, for the study of the development of commercial liquefaction plants. DOE--FE.......................... Multi-Year Demonstration of Carbon Sequestration in a Deep Saline Reservoir, Xcel Energy, 1,500,000 Senators Salazar, Allard Denver, CO, to determine the feasibility of geologic CO2 sequestration in a deep saline reservoir. DOE--FE.......................... National Center for Hydrogen Technology, University of North Dakota Energy and 3,000,000 Senator Dorgan Environmental Research Center, Grand Forks, ND, for the development of hydrogen technologies. DOE--FE.......................... Shale Oil Upgrading Utilizing Ionic Conductive Membranes, Ceramatec, Inc., Salt Lake City, 1,000,000 Senators Hatch, Bennett UT, to develop processes for upgrading oil shale, making oil extract high quality and affordable. DOE--FE.......................... Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, Siemens Power Generation, Pittsburgh, PA, to support development, 2,000,000 Senator Specter construction, and testing of the fuel processing systems. DOE--FE.......................... The Center for Advanced Separation Technology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, to 3,000,000 Senators McConnell, Warner, Webb support efforts to develop new technologies that reduce the cost of separations in coal, metals, and industrial mining operations. DOE--FE.......................... University of Kentucky Coal-Derived Low Energy Materials for Sustainable Construction 1,000,000 Senators McConnell, Bunning Project, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, to research alternative uses for coal combustion byproducts. DOE--FE.......................... Refining Capacity Study, North Dakota Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives, Mandan, 500,000 Senator Dorgan ND, to study refining capacity. DOE--FE.......................... Utah Center for Ultra Clean Coal Utilization & Heavy Oil Research, University of Utah, Salt 4,000,000 Senator Bennett Lake City, UT, to continue research on the commercial viability and validity of unconventional and clean energy technologies. DOE--NE.......................... Technologies Ventures Corporation, Technologies Ventures Corporation, Albuquerque, NM, for 3,000,000 Senator Domenici technology transfer activities. DOE--Nuclear Waste............... Cooperative agreement between the Department of Energy and Inyo County, Inyo County, 1,600,000 Senator Feinstein Independence, CA, to complete studies under the cooperative agreement. DOE--Nuclear Waste............... Inyo County Affected Unit of Local Government, County of Inyo, Inyo County, CA, to conduct 350,000 Senator Feinstein scientific oversight responsibilities and participate in licensing activities. DOE--ODA......................... Medical Monitoring at Paducah, KY, Portsmouth, OH, and Oak Ridge, TN, Paducah, Portsmouth, 1,050,000 Senator McConnell and Oak Ridge Medical Monitoring, Paducah, KY, Portsmouth, OH, and Oak Ridge, TN, to provide for continued conventional medical work-ups and lung scans and re-scans for current and former workers. DOE--OE.......................... Alternate Fuel for Cement Processing, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, to focus on the 1,500,000 Senator Shelby integration of the burning process into existing kiln systems in Lafarge plants, maximization of burn efficiency and minimization of waste/discharge. DOE--OE.......................... Center of Excellence Lab, Bismarck State College, Bismarck, ND, to develop a state-of-the 1,400,000 Senator Dorgan art lab. DOE--OE.......................... Energy Development and Reliability, Bismarck State College, Bismarck, ND, to promote and 300,000 Senator Dorgan advance the region's energy industry. DOE--OE.......................... Integrated Distribution Management System, Southern Company, Birmingham, AL, to provide 1,500,000 Senator Shelby seamlessly integrated set of information systems providing all of the major functionality needed to operate an electric distribution system. DOE--OE.......................... Iowa Stored Energy Plant, Iowa Associations of Municipal Utilities, Ankeny, IA, for 1,500,000 Senator Harkin, Grassley compressed air energy storage project. DOE--OE.......................... Navajo Electrification Demonstration Program, Navajo Tribal Utility Authority, Fort 2,000,000 Senators Bingaman, Domenici Defiance, AZ, to provide electric power to homes on the reservation. DOE--OE.......................... North Dakota Energy Workforce Development, Bismarck State College, Bismarck, ND, for a 1,900,000 Senator Dorgan workforce development programs. DOE--OE.......................... San Mateo County Solar Genesis Project, County of San Mateo, Redwood City, CA, for a solar 1,500,000 Senator Boxer power electric generation facility. DOE--OE.......................... SmartGrid Integration Lab, Colorado State University, Ft Collins, CO, to demonstrate core 1,000,000 Senators Allard, Salazar smart grid capabilities. DOE--OE.......................... Technology Development, Red River Valley Research Corridor, Grand Forks, ND, to promote and 300,000 Senator Dorgan advance the research, development and commercialization activities occurring in North Dakota's Red River Valley Research Corridor. DOE--SC.......................... Antibodies Research, University of North Dakota Research Foundation, Grand Forks, ND, to 2,750,000 Senator Dorgan research and develop antibodies for disease threats. DOE--SC.......................... Bionanotechnology: Research and Commercialization, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA, 1,500,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter for bionanotechnology and biofuels research. DOE--SC.......................... Center for Advanced Energy Studies, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID, to conduct 3,000,000 Senators Craig, Crapo a pilot program to demonstrate the Nuclear Science Talent Expansion program. DOE--SC.......................... Center for Diagnostic Nanosystems, Marshall University, Huntington, WV, for disease 2,000,000 Senator Byrd detection and diagnosis research. DOE--SC.......................... Center for Nanomedicine and Cellular Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of MD, 750,000 Senator Mikulski Baltimore, MD, for research. DOE--SC.......................... Center of Excellence and Hazardous Materials, Carlsbad, NM, for applied research........... 2,000,000 Senator Domenici DOE--SC.......................... Climate Change Modeling Capability, Los Alamos National Lab, Los Alamos, NM, for climate 5,000,000 Senator Domenici change modeling. DOE--SC.......................... Computing Capability, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, to increase supercomputing 5,000,000 Senator Dorgan power. DOE--SC.......................... Contrast Media and Wound Closure Reduction Study, University of Mississippi, University of 650,000 Senator Cochran Mississippi, MS, for efficiency in Iodine-based medical imaging for diagnostic procedures. DOE--SC.......................... Facilitating blood-brain barrier research, Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, WA, for 1,500,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell cooperative research. DOE--SC.......................... Former Workers Medical Surveillance Programs, State University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, for 1,000,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley medical surveillance, needs assessment and former worker medical screenings. DOE--SC.......................... Functional MRI Research, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, to 1,250,000 Senator Leahy support MRI research. DOE--SC.......................... Intermountain Center for River Restoration and Rehabilitation, Utah State University, 600,000 Senator Bennett Logan, UT, to continue researching river restoration and environmental management. DOE--SC.......................... Marine Systems Research, University of Massachusetts at Boston, Boston, MA, for research 500,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry into aquatic ecosystems, marine biology, fisheries and mammal sustainability. DOE--SC.......................... Materials and Energy Research Development, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, for 1,000,000 Senator Landrieu, Vitter environmental and materials research. DOE--SC.......................... Matter-Radiation Interactions in Extremes, Los Alamos National Lab, Los Alamos, NM, for 7,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman advanced materials testing. DOE--SC.......................... Mind Institute, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, to advance the understanding of 12,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman mental illness through advanced brain imaging. DOE--SC.......................... Neuroscience research, Dominican University, River Forest, IL, for research in to memory 500,000 Senator Durbin dysfunc- tions. DOE--SC.......................... Pioneer Valley Life Sciences Institute Biomedical Research, Pioneer Valley Life Science 500,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry Institute, Springfield, MA, for research programs. DOE--SC.......................... Regenerative Medicine, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, 500,000 Senator Durbin IL, for regenerative medicine research. DOE--SC.......................... Research into Proton Beam Thearapy, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, to research 1,500,000 Senator Murray new uses for proton beam therapy. DOE--SC.......................... Sandia Nanotechnology Engineering Center, Sandia National Lab, Albuquerque, NM, for 5,000,000 Senator Domenici nanotechnology engineering activities. DOE--SC.......................... Supercapacitors, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, for work to be done in 1,500,000 Senator Schumer, Bingaman Ostego, NY on supercapacitors. DOE--SC.......................... Sustainable Biofuels Development Center, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, to 1,500,000 Senator Salazar support research efforts in alternative energy technologies. DOE--Weapons..................... Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, to promote prosperity in New 1,000,000 Senator Domenici Mexico through economic development. DOE-WEAPONS...................... Electronic Record for Worker Safety and Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Clark 1,500,000 Senator Reid County to help the Nevada Site Office improve responses to DOE worker claims. DOE--Weapons..................... Renewable Energy Planning, National Nuclear Security Administration, Nevada Test Site, NV, 500,000 Senator Reid for planning to maximize renewable energy production at the Site. DOE--Weapons..................... Restore Manhattan Project Sites, Los Alamos National Lab, Los Alamos, NM, for historic 500,000 Senator Domenici preserva- tion. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 [In thousands of dollars] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Senate Committee recommendation compared with (+ or -) Item 2008 Budget estimate Committee --------------------------------- appropriation recommendation 2008 appropriation Budget estimate -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Corps of Engineers--Civil Investigations..................................................... 167,261 91,000 166,000 -1,261 +75,000 Rescissions.................................................... -100 ............... ............... +100 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Investigations........................................ 167,161 91,000 166,000 -1,161 +75,000 Construction....................................................... 2,294,029 1,402,000 2,004,500 -289,529 +602,500 Rescissions.................................................... -4,688 ............... ............... +4,688 ............... Emergency appropriation........................................ ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Construction.......................................... 2,289,341 1,402,000 2,004,500 -284,841 +602,500 Mississippi River and tributaries.................................. 387,402 240,000 365,000 -22,402 +125,000 Operations and Maintenance......................................... 2,243,637 2,475,000 2,220,000 -23,637 -255,000 Regulatory program................................................. 180,000 180,000 183,000 +3,000 +3,000 FUSRAP............................................................. 140,000 130,000 140,000 ............... +10,000 Flood control and coastal emergencies.............................. ............... 40,000 40,000 +40,000 ............... General Expenses................................................... 175,046 177,000 177,000 +1,954 ............... Office of Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works)............ 4,500 6,000 4,500 ............... -1,500 ==================================================================================== Total, title I, Department of Defense--Civil................. 5,587,087 4,741,000 5,300,000 -287,087 +559,000 Appropriations........................................... (5,591,875) (4,741,000) (5,300,000) (-291,875) (+559,000) Emergency appropriations................................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... Rescissions.............................................. (-4,788) ............... ............... (+4,788) ............... ==================================================================================== TITLE II--DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Central Utah Project Completion Account Central Utah project construction.................................. 40,404 39,373 39,373 -1,031 ............... Fish, wildlife, and recreation mitigation andconservation.......... 976 987 987 +11 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal..................................................... 41,380 40,360 40,360 -1,020 ............... Program oversight and administration............................... 1,620 1,640 1,640 +20 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Central Utah project completion account............... 43,000 42,000 42,000 -1,000 ............... Bureau of Reclamation Water and related resources........................................ 949,882 779,320 927,320 -22,562 +148,000 Rescission..................................................... ............... -175,000 ............... ............... +175,000 Central Valley project restoration fund............................ 59,122 56,079 56,079 -3,043 ............... California Bay-Delta restoration................................... 40,098 32,000 42,000 +1,902 +10,000 Policy and administration.......................................... 58,811 59,400 59,400 +589 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Bureau of Reclamation................................. 1,107,913 751,799 1,084,799 -23,114 +333,000 ==================================================================================== Total, title II, Department of the Interior.................. 1,150,913 793,799 1,126,799 -24,114 +333,000 ==================================================================================== TITLE III--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy............................. 1,722,407 1,255,393 1,928,259 +205,852 +672,866 Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................ 138,556 134,000 166,900 +28,344 +32,900 Nuclear energy..................................................... 961,665 853,644 803,000 -158,665 -50,644 (Reallocation from Energy supply and conservation)............. (682,877) ............... ............... (-682,877) ............... (Reallocation from Nuclear nonproliferation)................... (278,789) ............... ............... (-278,789) ............... Office of Legacy Management........................................ 33,872 ............... ............... -33,872 ............... Clean coal technology: Deferral of unobligated balances, fiscal year 2008............. 257,000 ............... ............... -257,000 ............... Deferral of unobligated balances, fiscal year 2009............. -149,000 149,000 149,000 +298,000 ............... Transfer to Fossil Energy R&D.................................. -164,489 -149,000 -149,000 +15,489 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Clean coal technology................................. -56,489 ............... ............... +56,489 ............... Fossil Energy Research and Development............................. 578,349 605,030 727,730 +149,381 +122,700 Transfer from Clean Coal Technology............................ 164,489 149,000 149,000 -15,489 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Fossil Energy Research and Development............. 742,838 754,030 876,730 +133,892 +122,700 Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves............................. 20,272 19,099 19,099 -1,173 ............... Strategic petroleum reserve........................................ 186,757 344,000 205,000 +18,243 -139,000 Northeast home heating oil reserve................................. 12,335 9,800 9,800 -2,535 ............... Energy Information Administration.................................. 95,460 110,595 110,595 +15,135 ............... Non-defense environmental clean up................................. 182,263 213,411 269,411 +87,148 +56,000 Uranium enrichment decontamination and decommissioning fund........ 622,162 480,333 515,333 -106,829 +35,000 Science............................................................ 4,017,711 4,721,969 4,640,469 +622,758 -81,500 Nuclear Waste Disposal............................................. 187,269 247,371 195,390 +8,121 -51,981 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program....................... 5,450 19,880 19,880 +14,430 ............... Offsetting collection.......................................... -991 -19,880 -19,880 -18,889 ............... Proposed change in subsidy cost................................ ............... 355,000 355,000 +355,000 ............... Advance appropriation (Public Law 110-161)..................... 42,000 ............... ............... -42,000 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Innovative Technology Guarantee Pgm................ 46,459 355,000 355,000 +308,541 ............... Departmental administration........................................ 309,662 272,144 272,144 -37,518 ............... Miscellaneous revenues......................................... -161,247 -117,317 -117,317 +43,930 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Net appropriation............................................ 148,415 154,827 154,827 +6,412 ............... Office of the Inspector General.................................... 46,057 51,927 51,927 +5,870 ............... Atomic Energy Defense Activities National Nuclear Security Administration: Weapons activities............................................. 6,297,466 6,618,079 6,524,579 +227,113 -93,500 Defense nuclear nonproliferation............................... 1,657,996 1,247,048 1,909,056 +251,060 +662,008 Rescissions................................................ -322,000 ............... ............... +322,000 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, Defense nuclear nonproliferation............... 1,335,996 1,247,048 1,909,056 +573,060 +662,008 Naval reactors................................................. 774,686 828,054 828,054 +53,368 ............... Office of the Administrator.................................... 402,137 404,081 404,081 +1,944 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, National Nuclear Security Administration........... 8,810,285 9,097,262 9,665,770 +855,485 +568,508 Defense environmental cleanup...................................... 5,349,325 5,297,256 5,771,506 +422,181 +474,250 Other defense activities........................................... 754,359 1,313,461 827,503 +73,144 -485,958 Defense nuclear waste disposal..................................... 199,171 247,371 193,000 -6,171 -54,371 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities...................... 15,113,140 15,955,350 16,457,779 +1,344,639 +502,429 ==================================================================================== Power Marketing Administrations Operation and maintenance, Southeastern Power Administration....... 54,817 56,940 56,940 +2,123 ............... Offsetting collection.......................................... -48,413 -49,520 -49,520 -1,107 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, O&M, Southeastern Power Administration............. 6,404 7,420 7,420 +1,016 ............... Operation and maintenance, Southwestern Power Administration....... 65,165 63,414 63,414 -1,751 ............... Offsetting collection.......................................... -35,000 -35,000 -35,000 ............... ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, O&M, Southwestern Power Administration............. 30,165 28,414 28,414 -1,751 ............... Construction, rehabilitation, operation and maintenance, Western 541,546 524,830 624,830 +83,284 +100,000 Area Power Administration......................................... Offsetting collection.......................................... -308,702 -328,118 -403,118 -94,416 -75,000 Offsetting collection Colorado River Dam Fund.................. -3,937 -3,366 -3,366 +571 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal, O&M, Western Area Power Administration............. 228,907 193,346 218,346 -10,561 +25,000 Falcon and Amistad operating and maintenance fund.................. 2,477 2,959 2,959 +482 ............... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total, Power Marketing Administrations....................... 267,953 232,139 257,139 -10,814 +25,000 ==================================================================================== Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Salaries and expenses.............................................. 260,425 273,400 273,400 +12,975 ............... Revenues applied................................................... -260,425 -273,400 -273,400 -12,975 ............... ==================================================================================== Total, title III, Department of Energy....................... 24,489,102 25,892,888 27,016,658 +2,527,556 +1,123,770 Appropriations........................................... (24,661,102) (25,743,888) (26,867,658) (+2,206,556) (+1,123,770) Rescissions.............................................. (-322,000) ............... ............... (+322,000) ............... Deferrals................................................ (108,000) (149,000) (149,000) (+41,000) ............... Advance appropriations................................... (42,000) ............... ............... (-42,000) ............... ==================================================================================== TITLE IV--INDEPENDENT AGENCIES Appalachian Regional Commission.................................... 73,032 65,000 85,000 +11,968 +20,000 Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board............................ 21,909 25,499 25,499 +3,590 ............... Delta Regional Authority........................................... 11,685 6,000 20,000 +8,315 +14,000 Denali Commission.................................................. 21,800 1,800 21,800 ............... +20,000 Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Salaries and expenses.......................................... 917,334 1,007,956 1,022,956 +105,622 +15,000 Revenues....................................................... -771,220 -847,357 -860,857 -89,637 -13,500 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal..................................................... 146,114 160,599 162,099 +15,985 +1,500 Office of Inspector General.................................... 8,744 9,044 9,344 +600 +300 Revenues....................................................... -7,870 -8,140 -8,410 -540 -270 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subtotal..................................................... 874 904 934 +60 +30 ==================================================================================== Total, Nuclear Regulatory Commission......................... 146,988 161,503 163,033 +16,045 +1,530 Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board............................... 3,621 3,811 3,811 +190 ............... Tennessee Valley Authority: Office of Inspector General............ ............... 17,000 ............... ............... -17,000 Offset......................................................... ............... -17,000 ............... ............... +17,000 Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska natural gas 2,261 4,400 4,400 +2,139 ............... transportation projects........................................... ==================================================================================== Total, title IV, Independent agencies........................ 281,296 268,013 323,543 +42,247 +55,530 ==================================================================================== Grand total.................................................. 31,508,398 31,695,700 33,767,000 +2,258,602 +2,071,300 Appropriations........................................... (31,685,186) (31,721,700) (33,618,000) (+1,932,814) (+1,896,300) Emergency appropriations................................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... Rescissions.............................................. (-326,788) (-175,000) ............... (+326,788) (+175,000) Deferrals................................................ (108,000) (149,000) (149,000) (+41,000) ............... Advance appropriations................................... (42,000) ............... ............... (-42,000) ............... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <all>