Energy Information Administration Logo. 
If you need assistance viewing this page, please call (202) 586-8800 Oil and Gas Lease Equipment and Operating Costs 1986 Through 2002
EIA Home
 

June 2003

Excel Spreadsheet Model - 1986-2002 XLS

Overview
Generally, the inflation adjusted year-to-year costs of equipping oil and gas leases was marginally higher and the cost of operating oil and gas leases were lower from 2001 to 2002.

Gas equipment costs increased by about 1 percent while gas operating costs dropped 1 percent. The 1 percent drop in the gas operating cost index from 2001 to 2002 is partly attributable to an almost 40 percent decline in the average cost of gas from 2001 to 2002.

Oil equipment costs were flat while oil operating costs dropped about 4 percent. The oil operating cost is sensitive to gas prices because natural gas is used in many oil production processes. The 4 percent decline in oil operating costs for 2002 is primarily attributable to the almost 40 percent decline in real gas prices from 2001 to 2002.

Offshore operating costs increased by over 4 percent. The increase in the operating cost index for 2002 is primarily caused by a large increase in insurance rates for offshore operations.

These changes are graphically shown in Figures ES1, ES2, and ES3, described in the Summary section.

Background
This report, with the accompanying Excel spreadsheet, presents estimated costs for domestic oil and natural gas field equipment and production operations for 1986 through 2002. Beginning with the 2002 report, coal bed methane costs have been added. Coal bed methane now accounts for about 8 percent of U.S. dry gas production and almost 10 percent of the dry natural gas reserves.

The costs of all equipment and services are those in effect during June of each year. The aggregate costs for typical leases by region, depth, and production rate were averaged and these averages provide a general measure of the changed costs from year to year for lease equipment and operations. The accompanying spreadsheets contain summary tables and detailed tables for equipment and services by region for the period 1986 through 2002.

Summary
Figures ES1 and ES2 indicate deflated oil and gas prices, equipment costs, and operating costs indexed to the base year of 1976 for natural gas and oil in the contiguous lower 48 states excluding offshore Gulf of Mexico. Figure ES3 shows separately the deflated operating costs and gas price indexed to 1976 for the offshore Gulf of Mexico wells.

Figure ES1 shows that the deflated prices of both natural gas equipment and operations have changed less over time than has the deflated price of natural gas. Deflated gas equipment costs remain below those for the base year of 1976. The deflated gas prices were high from 1982 to 1984 (in the range of 270) and set a record of 274.4 in 2001 before declining to 194.5 in 2002. The January 2001 gas price averaged $8.06 per MCF and averaged $4.12 per MCF for the year 2001. Gas prices started 2002 at $2.35 per MCF and averaged $2.95 per MCF for the year. Beginning in the 4th quarter of 2002, gas prices began rising due to increased demand resulting from colder than average temperatures.



Figure ES1. Deflated Natural Gas Price, Equipment Costs, and Operating Cost Indices.

Similarly, Figure ES2 depicts deflated oil prices, equipment and operating costs for oil production indexed to 1976. There are two main differences between the gas and oil indexes. First, the gas price index has remained above the 1976 base, while oil prices rose above the base only five times since 1986, in 1987, 1990, 2000, 2001 and 2002. The 1998 deflated oil prices were only 20 percent of the peak price in 1981. In December 1998 oil prices were at their lowest level since World War II.

Oil prices averaged $21.84 per bbl for 2001 and began 2002 at $15.89 per bbl. The high price for the year was in September when average oil prices were at $26.08 per bbl. The average 2002 price was $22.93 per bbl, an increase of 5 percent from 2001.

Second, oil operating cost index values have remained above 1976 levels while gas operating index values fell below 1976 values in 1986 and only went above the baseline starting in 1998. Both have remained within a relatively narrow range since 1976.

The oil operating cost is sensitive to gas prices because natural gas is used in some oil production processes. Thus the increase in the oil operating cost index for years 2000 and 2001 is primarily attributable to the increase in gas prices for 2000 and 2001. The same effect was observed from 1976 to 1982 with the increase in gas prices during that time frame causing the oil operating index to increase. The 4 percent decline in oil operating costs for 2002 is therefore primarily attributable to the almost 40 percent decline in real gas prices from 2001 to 2002.



Figure ES2. Deflated Oil Price, Equipment Costs, and Operating Cost Indices.



Figure ES3 shows the deflated oil and gas operating costs for offshore Gulf of Mexico wells. Gas prices for Louisiana were used to represent offshore indexed gas prices. The increase in the operating cost index that occurred in 1997 was primarily caused by a major increase in the cost for transport boats. The increase in the operating cost index for 2002 is primarily caused by a large increase in insurance rates for offshore operations.



Figure ES3. Deflated Indices for Natural Gas Prices and Operating Costs for Offshore Wells.



Methodology
The costs provided in this report are for representative lease operations with equipment and operating procedures designed by EIA staff engineers. Costs are estimated for representative 10-well oil leases producing by artificial lift; 1 flowing gas well per gas lease; or 10-well coal bed methane leases dewatering by artificial lift. While coal bed methane leases will typically have hundreds of wells, we have chosen to use a 10-well lease for the purpose of this study. The design criteria took into account the predominant methods of operation in each region. Individual items of equipment were priced by using price lists and by communicating with the manufacturers or suppliers of the item in each region. The leading supply, service, and contracting companies (active in one or more of the regions) were contacted every year (1976 through 2002) for local June prices for their component of equipment or operating function. The objective of this process is to acquire prices that are representative for each region. The annual operating costs measure the change in direct costs incident to the production of oil and gas and exclude changes in indirect costs such as depreciation and ad valorem and severance taxes.

Primary Oil Recovery
Leases for onshore oil wells were assumed to consist of 10 wells producing by artificial lift into a centrally located tank battery. The depths of all wells on each of the leases were either 2,000, 4,000, 8,000, or 12,000 feet.

Costs were determined for new equipment capable of producing 200 barrels of liquid per day per well for onshore primary operations. Tubing costs were included for information only. Note that care must be exercised when combining these equipment costs with drilling costs to obtain total lease development and equipment costs, because most drilling and completion cost estimates include tubing costs. Drilling and completion costs for the primary production wells are not included in this study. The artificial lift method selected was dependent on the type of lift found to be dominant for each depth in each region. The two types of prime movers considered were electric motors and natural gas engines. Annual operating costs were estimated for daily production rates of 100 barrels of liquid per day per well for each depth in each region of operation with a 10 percent water content.

Secondary Oil Recovery
Costs for secondary oil recovery in west Texas were calculated for wells producing from depths of 2,000, 4,000, and 8,000 feet. Each lease was assumed to have 10 producing wells, 11 injection wells and 1 disposal well. Costs for water storage tanks, injection plant, filtering systems, injection lines and drilling water supply wells and water injection wells are included. Equipment was designed to handle 350 barrels of liquid per day per producing well. Gas engines used in primary operations were replaced by electric motors for secondary oil recovery. Some equipment for primary oil recovery was replaced with larger equipment to accommodate the increased liquid volumes assumed for secondary oil production. Increases in operational costs for secondary oil recovery are indicated for the increased liquid lift of 250 barrels of liquid per day per producing well and for the water injection system.

Offshore Gas and Primary Oil Recovery
Operating costs for the offshore Gulf of Mexico were estimated for 12- and 18-slot platforms containing one dually-completed well in each slot. Maximum crude oil production was assumed to total 11,000 barrels of oil per day from each platform. Maximum associated gas production was assumed to be 40 million cubic feet of gas per day per platform. Note that the balance between gas and oil is more heavily weighted toward gas in offshore operations than in onshore leases. Operating costs were derived for platforms assumed to be 50, 100, and 125 miles from shore corresponding to water depths of 100, 300, and 600 feet, respectively. Meals, platform maintenance, helicopter and boat transportation of personnel and supplies, communication costs, insurance costs for platform and production equipment, and administrative expenses are included in normal production expenses. Crude oil and natural gas transportation costs to shore were excluded, as were water disposal costs.

Gas Recovery
Leases for gas wells were assumed to consist of one well producing into an onsite separator with two storage tanks (a lease condensate sales tank and a water storage tank). Line heaters, dehydration units, and methanol injectors were included where needed. It was assumed that any compression or gas treatment would be furnished by the first purchaser. The cost data presented were based on the installation of new equipment and included items needed from the wellhead to the outlet on the meter run for the gas stream and through the tank for liquid streams. Tubing costs were not included, nor were costs of equipment for disposal of produced water above nominal amounts of water entrained in the gas stream. Gas production rates of 50, 250, 500, 1,000, 5,000 and 10,000 MCF/D and well depths of 2,000, 4,000, 8,000, 12,000 and 16,000 feet were the assumed volume and depth divisions for the cost determinations. These volumes were selected because of different processing requirements for each of these flow rates. Production records were used to determine the average production rate for each depth in each region. The equipment and operating costs for each of these average production rates were then calculated. For a broader view of each flow rate in each region at each depth, the equipment and operating costs of the next higher and/or lower rates are shown. Costs were calculated for equipping gas wells at producing rates of 50 MCF/D even though a new well coming onstream at this rate may not be economic. This low rate was selected to identify costs of production from stripper gas wells. Flow rates above 10,000 MCF/D usually require custom design of equipment and are not priced in this report.

The depths of 2,000, 4,000, 8,000, and 12,000 feet were chosen to be compatible with data provided for oil production. An additional depth of 16,000 feet was added for gas equipment and operations because there is significant gas production from this depth in some regions studied.

Coal Bed Methane Recovery
Leases for coal bed methane were assumed to consist of 10 wells dewatering by the predominant artificial method employed in that area. The production depths and rates were chosen as representative for that area. The areas modeled are Appalachia, Black Warrior Basin (Alabama), Powder River Basin (Wyoming), and San Juan Basin (New Mexico). Additional areas may be added in future reports. The following table lists the average production depth, per well production rates, and dewatering method used in the model.

Dewatering
Method
Per Well
AREA
Depth
Gas Mcf/d Water BWPD
Appalachia
2,100'
sucker rod
60 3
Black Warrior
2,000'
sucker rod
100 20
Powder River
1,000'
submersible
50 50
San Juan
3,000'
sucker rod
500 100

Costs were determined for new equipment. Tubing costs were included for information only. Note that care must be exercised when combining these equipment costs with drilling costs to obtain total lease development and equipment costs because most drilling and completion cost estimates include tubing costs. Drilling and completion costs are not included in this study.

Revisions
Data used in this work were revised for at least one year. Late arrival of data necessitates using estimates in some cases, and in other cases, small items have been combined to reduce reporting burdens on data suppliers. The cost data comes from leading supply, service, and contracting companies in a region. If one of these companies should go out of business a replacement company is identified. The replacement company prices may vary slightly from the original company's prices. The costs to drill and complete the water disposal wells, water supply wells and secondary recovery water injection wells are based on an estimate since the source for the drilling and completion costs (the Joint Association Survey on Drilling Costs) are a year behind in order to collate the necessary data. In general, since 1976, data gathering has become more challenging, in part due to the restructuring of the industry, and in part due to normal changes in product lists. Changes in equipment and operating practices are adopted where they represent a majority of new property activity. In this manner, increases in productivity are recognized, although gradually.

Results

Oil Leases
Tables ES1 and ES2 contain the 2002 equipment costs and operating costs for a 10-well oil lease for the six regions, the Lower 48 states and the additional costs for secondary recovery in West Texas. Costs for the offshore Gulf of Mexico wells are not included in the aggregated totals used for tables ES1 and ES2.

Table ES1. Annual Equipping Costs for 10-well Oil Leases in 2002 (Current US Dollars)
Producing Depth, feet
Region
2,000
4,000
8,000
12,000
California
1,169,600 1,403,000 1,783,500 2,144,000
Oklahoma
866,300 1,080,000 1,558,400 1,876,200
South Louisiana
952,400 1,117,800 1,421,400 2,147,300
South Texas
889,600 1,034,200 1,282,800 2,049,700
West Texas
862,600 1,060,400 1,777,400 1,900,900
Rocky Mountains
880,100 1,084,800 1,693,700 1,939,200
Lower 48 States excluding offshore
936,800 1,130,000 1,586,200 2,009,600
Additional cost for Secondary
Recovery in West Texas
2,338,400 4,472,000 8,356,500 N.A.

Table ES2. Annual Operating Costs for 10-well Oil Leases in 2002 (Current US Dollars)
Producing Depth, feet
Region
2,000
4,000
8,000
12,000
California
161,700 211,300 370,600 545,000
Oklahoma
144,100 167,500 301,200 361,700
South Louisiana
177,000 252,700 299,600 426,400
South Texas
175,600 229,200 281,900 435,600
West Texas
135,200 157,400 216,200 338,700
Rocky Mountains
149,700 169,500 240,600 338,900
Lower 48 States excluding offshore
157,200 197,900 285,000 407,700
Additional cost for Secondary
Recovery in West Texas
322,600 440,000 616,300 N.A.

Gas Leases
Tables ES3 and ES4 contain equipping and operating costs for onshore gas wells displayed by depth, region, and per well producing rate. Since the rate-depth combinations are chosen for each region to reflect the majority of the wells in that region, the tables contain blanks, which represent rate-depth combinations which were not found in significant numbers in the base year of 1976. The averages for the Lower 48 states show that the equipping costs generally increase with depth at each of the producing rates.

Table ES3. Annual Equipment Costs for 1 well Gas Leases in 2002 (Current US Dollars)
Region
2,000
4,000
8,000
12,000
16,000
Producing 50 Mcf/D
West Texas
19,600 19,600 29,300
South Texas
21,300 21,300
South Louisiana
22,800 21,800
North Louisiana
22,800
Mid-Continent
22,100 22,100
Rocky Mountains
23,400 23,400
Lower 48 States excluding offshore
21,700 21,600 29,300
Producing 250 Mcf/D
West Texas
19,600 29,900 48,700 64,000
South Texas
21,300 31,800 50,700
South Louisiana
21,800 32,300 51,600
North Louisiana
21,800 32,400 51,100
Mid-Continent
24,000 32,100 51,700 67,500
Rocky Mountains
23,400 48,400 55,000 69,100
Lower 48 States excluding offshore
22,000 34,500 51,500 66,900
Producing 500 Mcf/D
West Texas
46,900 62,300 69,800
South Texas
48,900 64,300
South Louisiana
49,700 65,100 65,100
North Louisiana
31,300 49,700 65,100
Mid-Continent
30,200 49,000 65,600 71,200
Rocky Mountains
52,200 53,200 67,200
Lower 48 States excluding offshore
37,900 49,600 64,900 68,700
Producing 1 MMcf/D
West Texas
69,800 69,800
South Texas
70,000 70,000
South Louisiana
70,800 70,800 70,800
North Louisiana
70,800 70,800
Mid-Continent
71,200 71,200
Rocky Mountains
67,200
Lower 48 States excluding offshore
70,400 70,000 70,700
Producing 5 MMcf/D
West Texas
85,200
South Texas
85,500
South Louisiana
86,300 86,300
North Louisiana
86,300
Mid-Continent
86,900
Lower 48 States excluding offshore
85,900 86,200
Producing 10 MMcf/D
North Louisiana
113,100



Table ES4. Annual Operating Costs for 1 well Gas Leases in 2002 (Current US Dollars)
Region
2,000
4,000
8,000
12,000
16,000
Producing 50 Mcf/D
West Texas
10,300 12,800 16,900
South Texas
11,900 13,900
South Louisiana
11,800 13,700
North Louisiana
11,800
Mid-Continent
11,900 13,700
Rocky Mountains
12,400 14,600
Lower 48 States excluding offshore
11,700 13,700 16,900
Producing 250 Mcf/D
West Texas
12,800 18,400 31,400 39,600
South Texas
14,400 19,600 33,600
South Louisiana
14,300 20,100 34,700
North Louisiana
14,300 20,200 35,100
Mid-Continent
16,200 21,900 34,800 43,100
Rocky Mountains
14,900 25,000 34,400 43,100
Lower 48 States excluding offshore
14,500 20,900 34,000 41,900
Producing 500 Mcf/D
West Texas
23,100 28,800 33,200
South Texas
25,700 32,500
South Louisiana
28,900 33,300 36,500
North Louisiana
19,900 28,300 32,100
Mid-Continent
20,400 27,600 33,400 36,800
Rocky Mountains
23,600 26,900 33,300
Lower 48 States excluding offshore
21,300 26,800 32,200 35,500
Producing 1 MMcf/D
West Texas
37,200 41,700
South Texas
39,300 38,100
South Louisiana
36,700 43,400 47,400
North Louisiana
41,800 47,500
Mid-Continent
43,500 47,100
Rocky Mountains
41,800
Lower 48 States excluding offshore
38,000 41,000 45,900
Producing 5 MMcf/D
West Texas
46,100
South Texas
41,100
South Louisiana
38,300 50,400
North Louisiana
50,800
Mid-Continent
48,000

Lower 48 States excluding offshore

39,700 48,800
Producing 10 MMcf/D
North Louisiana
66,000

 

Offshore
Table ES5 provides operating costs for offshore wells displayed by platform size and water depth.

  Table ES5. Annual Operating Costs for Gulf of Mexico wells in 2002 (Current US Dollars)
 
 
Water Depth, feet
Platform Size
100-ft
300-ft
600-ft
12 Slot
4,580,100
4,768,000
 
18 Slot
5,606,300
5,822,500
6,237,600
 
GOM Average
5,093,200
5,295,300
6,237,600

 

Coal Bed Methane Leases
Table ES6 and ES7 provide the 2002 lease equipment costs and operating costs for a 10-well Coal Bed Methane lease.

Table ES6. Annual Operating Costs for Gulf of Mexico wells in 2002 (Current US Dollars)
Producing Depth, feet
Area
1,000
2,000
3,000
Appalachia
616,800
Black Warrior
431,900
Powder River
286,400
San Juan
912,200

Table ES7. Annual Operating Costs for 10-well Coal Bed Methane leases in 2002 (Current US Dollars)
Producing Depth, feet
Area
1,000
2,000
3,000
Appalachia
148,400
Black Warrior
82,700
Powder River
93,400
San Juan
119,000

Water handling costs are a major factor in coal bed methane operating costs and partially account for the difference in operating costs.

Items tracked
Table ES8 indicates the more significant cost items tracked from year to year, beginning in most cases with the year 1976. Freight and taxes are also a part of the equipment cost, as is the labor to install the equipment. Maintenance costs include replacement costs of some of the more common wear items.

Table ES8. Items tracked for Oil or Gas, or Coal Bed Methane Lease Equipment and Operating Costs
Automobile Costs Oil transfer pumps
Communications costs - land Oilfield chemicals
Communications costs - offshore Oilfield maintenance - land
Electric lease power Oilfield maintenance - marine
Electric motors and controllers Packers
Electric labor - field Perforating
Electric materials - field Pipe coating
Fences Plastic tanks
Field structures - small Pumping engines- gas
Fishing tools Pumping motors - electric
Miscellaneous fittings Pumping unit bases
Gas compressors Pumping units
Gas lift equipment Slick line work - offshore
Gas sales meters Speciality tubing
Gross national product deflator Submersible pumps
Helicopter service Submersible hydraulic pumps
Hot oil service Sucker rods
Insulation Tubular goods - lease
Insurance - offshore Tubular goods - well
Labor statistics - oil field Tugs and barges
Labor - clerical Valves, pumps, misc. - land
Labor - supervisory Water filter cases
Labor - technical Water filters
Large engine for hydraulic pumping Water injection pumps
Lease processing and storage equipment Well costs - secondary recovery
Lubricants Well servicing - land
Marine food services Well servicing - offshore
Natural gas prices Wellheads
Oil sales meters Work boats