U.S. Senator Ken Salazar

Member of the Agriculture, Energy and Veterans Affairs Committees

 

2300 15th Street, Suite 450 Denver, CO 80202 | 702 Hart Senate Building, Washington, D.C. 20510

 

 

For Immediate Release

March 29, 2005

CONTACT:    Cody Wertz – Press Secretary

                        202-228-3630

Jen Clanahan – Deputy Press Secretary

                        303-455-7600

 

SALAZAR RELEASES LETTER FROM USDA UNDERSECRETARY REY REGARDING DECISION TO OVERTURN PORTIONS OF WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST PLAN DESPITE YEARS OF PUBLIC INPUT

WASHINGTON, DC – United States Senator Ken Salazar released a letter he received earlier on Monday from Undersecretary of Agriculture for Natural Resources and the Environment Mark Rey.

Undersecretary Rey’s letter, dated March 11, 2005 but received in Salazar’s office on the 28th, came in response to a February 25, 2005 letter from Salazar to Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns requesting a briefing on the USDA’s White River National Forest management plan, which overrode several aspects of the 2002 Revised Plan for the Forest despite five years of public planning and the input of 14,000 individuals as well as the opinions of Forest Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife biologists.

On March 2, Senator Salazar received his briefing from Deputy Undersecretary David Tenny and Regional Forester Rick Cables, during which Tenny and Cables agreed to meet in Colorado to explain to Colorado citizens why the USDA exercised a rarely-used procedure to overturn years of local input reflected in the 2002 Revised Plan. Salazar also requested a letter from Tenny and Cables explaining the implications of Tenny’s decision to override the 2002 plan, which Salazar said he would release to Coloradans.

Salazar said of Rey’s response, “I appreciate that the Department has responded to my request to explain why the input of over 14,000 Coloradans was overridden and that they are committed to coming to Colorado to explain their decision to the people of Colorado. I will continue to monitor this issue as the forest service moves forward with implementing the forest management plan.”

# # #