Committee on House Administration topper image
#
header_mid _left Relief Sculptures in the Rotunda
"William Penn and the Indians" - William Penn is shown at center with the Delaware Indians at the time of the Treaty of Shackamaxon.  This treaty formalized the purchase of land in Pennsylvania and cemented an amicable relationship between the Quakers and the Indians for almost a hundred years.  Penn was the last figure on which Brumidi worked.
header bottom left
#
#
COMMITTEE SCHEDULE
<   01/25/09 to 02/07/09   >
SMTWTFS
25262728293031
01020304050607
View Full Calendar

Click here to view Committee Proceedings Live


SIGNUP FOR E-MAIL UPDATES
PRESS RELEASES
OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS BOARD HOLDS FIRST MEETING

Brady Applauds VA Policy Revision

Committee on House Administration Introduces Black Americans in Congress publication

#
Home > Newsroom > Press Releases > View Press Release
TRANSLATE # A+ | A- | Reset # Print this page E-mail a link to this page
Back to: Press Releases

BRADY RESPONSE TO SUPREME COURT DECISION ON VOTER ID

Washington, DC (April 28, 2008) Today, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision upholding an Indiana law requiring that voters produce photo identification. In explaining their decision, the majority cited concerns over voter fraud and ensuring voter confidence in the election system. This judgment has far-reaching implications for the imposition of voter ID requirements in other states.

In November of 2007, I joined with my colleagues Rep. Zoe Lofgren and Senator Dianne Feinstein in filing an amicus brief arguing the inconsistency of Indiana’s photo-identification requirements for federal elections with federal law and the degree to which they disenfranchise voters. I strongly believe that voter confidence in our electoral system can only be achieved by maximizing the participation of eligible voters. What is most disturbing about the Court's decision today is the complete lack of any evidence that the legislation serves any purpose other than making it more difficult for some to vote. Unnecessary barriers to full and unimpeded participation irreparably damage our system of government and calls into question its integrity.

The split of opinions in this case is a telling example of the partisan nature of this clearly discriminatory approach. The members of the Supreme Court who endorsed this policy were all appointed under Republican administrations, further reinforcing the idea that suppressing broad voter participation serves conservative Republican interests. Specifically, the voter ID requirement has the potential to severely disenfranchise minority and elderly voters as well as student voters, three demographics that have been historically targeted for voter suppression.

The Court’s ruling leaves open the possibility of bringing other challenges to the law that demonstrate a burden on voters. States considering enacting voter ID laws should not see this ruling as tacitly supporting those measures. As Chairman of the Committee on House Administration, I will continue to aggressively support initiatives and legislation that ensure that every eligible citizen’s right to vote is protected. Anything less would represent a disservice to the American population that we serve.

For more information, Contact: Kyle Anderson – Press Director
(202)225-7476 office / (202)384-3305 mobile

 



Back to: Press Releases
SITE SEARCH
SITE MAP
HOT ISSUES


HIGHLIGHTS


SEARCH LEGISLATION
(THOMAS)
 
#
# # #

Committee On House Administrationbullet1309 Longworth BuildingbulletWashington, DC 20515bulletTelephone: 202-225-2061bulletFax: 202-226-2774

PRIVACY POLICY