Summary

WHERE PROTESTER RAISES ISSUES THAT HAD BEEN THOROUGHLY CONSIDERED IN PRIOR DECISIONS AND PROTESTER HAS FAILED TO SUPPLY ADDITIONAL FACTS OR OFFER ANY ARGUMENTS OF LAW TO DEMONSTRATE PRIOR DECISIONS WERE IN ERROR. PRIOR DECISIONS DENYING PROTEST ARE REAFFIRMED. 2. WHERE GOVERNMENT INSTALLATION EMPLOYEE PICKS UP MAIL AT POSTAL SERVICE BRANCH AND TIME/DATE STAMP INDICATING RECEIPT OF BID BY POSTAL SERVICE WAS ILLEGIBLE. PROVIDES THAT A "REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION SHALL CONTAIN A DETAILED STATEMENT OF THE FACTUAL AND LEGAL GROUNDS UPON WHICH REVERSAL OR MODIFICATION IS DEEMED WARRANTED. GROSS RAISES SEVERAL ISSUES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN THOROUGHLY CONSIDERED AND REPORTED IN OUR PRIOR DECISIONS WITH REASONS FOR THE CONCLUSIONS REACHED.