<DOC> [108th Congress House Hearings] [From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access] [DOCID: f:94157.wais] FAITH BASED PERSPECTIVES ON THE PROVISION OF COMMUNITY SERVICES ======================================================================= HEARING before the SUBCOMMITTEE ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE, DRUG POLICY AND HUMAN RESOURCES of the COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION __________ JANUARY 12, 2004 __________ Serial No. 108-152 __________ Printed for the use of the Committee on Government Reform Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/congress/house http://www.house.gov/reform ______ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 94-157 WASHINGTON : DC ____________________________________________________________________________ For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; (202) 512ÿ091800 Fax: (202) 512ÿ092250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402ÿ090001 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM TOM DAVIS, Virginia, Chairman DAN BURTON, Indiana HENRY A. WAXMAN, California CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut TOM LANTOS, California ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida MAJOR R. OWENS, New York JOHN M. McHUGH, New York EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York JOHN L. MICA, Florida PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York STEVEN C. LaTOURETTE, Ohio ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland DOUG OSE, California DENNIS J. KUCINICH, Ohio RON LEWIS, Kentucky DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois JO ANN DAVIS, Virginia JOHN F. TIERNEY, Massachusetts TODD RUSSELL PLATTS, Pennsylvania WM. LACY CLAY, Missouri CHRIS CANNON, Utah DIANE E. WATSON, California ADAM H. PUTNAM, Florida STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts EDWARD L. SCHROCK, Virginia CHRIS VAN HOLLEN, Maryland JOHN J. DUNCAN, Jr., Tennessee LINDA T. SANCHEZ, California JOHN SULLIVAN, Oklahoma C.A. ``DUTCH'' RUPPERSBERGER, NATHAN DEAL, Georgia Maryland CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania Columbia MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio JIM COOPER, Tennessee JOHN R. CARTER, Texas CHRIS BELL, Texas WILLIAM J. JANKLOW, South Dakota ------ MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont (Independent) Peter Sirh, Staff Director Melissa Wojciak, Deputy Staff Director Rob Borden, Parliamentarian Teresa Austin, Chief Clerk Phil Barnett, Minority Chief of Staff/Chief Counsel Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana, Chairman NATHAN DEAL, Georgia ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland JOHN M. McHUGH, New York DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois JOHN L. MICA, Florida WM. LACY CLAY, Missouri DOUG OSE, California LINDA T. SANCHEZ, California JO ANN DAVIS, Virginia C.A. ``DUTCH'' RUPPERSBERGER, EDWARD L. SCHROCK, Virginia Maryland JOHN R. CARTER, Texas ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee Columbia CHRIS BELL, Texas Ex Officio TOM DAVIS, Virginia HENRY A. WAXMAN, California J. Marc Wheat, Staff Director and Chief Counsel Elizabeth Meyer, Professional Staff Member Nicole Garrett, Clerk C O N T E N T S ---------- Page Hearing held on January 12, 2004................................. 1 Statement of: Carrasco, Rudy, executive director of the Harambee School, Pasadena, CA, and Nueva Esperanza, Inc., and Esperanza USA; Lee de Leon, Templo Calvario; Jeff Carr, executive director, the Bresee Foundation............................ 9 Phillips, Keith, president, World Impact; Doug Gold, executive director, Jewish Big Brothers and Big Sisters; John Baker, Celebrate Recovery; Steve Allen, Salvation Army of southern California; and Tim Hooten, executive director, Office of Ministry and Service, Azusa Pacific University... 53 Letters, statements, etc., submitted for the record by: Allen, Steve, Salvation Army of southern California, prepared statement of............................................... 77 Baker, John, Celebrate Recovery; Steve Allen, Salvation Army of southern California, prepared statement of.............. 69 Carrasco, Rudy, executive director of the Harambee School, Pasadena, CA, and Nueva Esperanza, Inc., and Esperanza USA, prepared statement of...................................... 12 de Leon, Lee, Templo Calvario, prepared statement of......... 21 Gold, Doug, executive director, Jewish Big Brothers and Big Sisters, prepared statement of............................. 64 Phillips, Keith, president, World Impact, prepared statement of......................................................... 57 Souder, Hon. Mark E., a Representative in Congress from the State of Indiana, prepared statement of.................... 5 FAITH BASED PERSPECTIVES ON THE PROVISION OF COMMUNITY SERVICES ---------- MONDAY, JANUARY, 12, 2004 House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources, Committee on Government Reform, Los Angeles, CA. The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 11:30 a.m., at the Los Angeles Christian School, 2003 East Imperial Highway, Los Angeles, CA, Hon. Mark E. Souder (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. Present: Representative Souder. Staff present: Elizabeth Meyer, professional staff member and counsel; and Nicole Garrett, clerk. Mr. Souder. The subcommittee will now come to order. I want to thank all of you for being here today. And I want to thank the Watts School from World Impact for hosting us today for greeting us out at the door and receiving all the visitors to their school here today. It is a privilege to be back here. I visited in 1992 just after the riots were here in Los Angeles as well as the World Impact facility in Newark. That was back when I was a staffer for then Senator Dan Coats. And the first time I was in was up at the Harmby School and other places was somewhere around 1985 when I was a staff director of the Children, Youth and Family Committee in the House of Representatives. Since then I have been elected to Congress, and this is part of a series of hearings. I am going to first read a formal statement for the record. We have a recorder here who will be taking down everything that we say today. It will be published in the form of a hearing book and then part of a larger report on faith-based that we are doing around the country. Good morning. And thank you for joining us today as we continue our discussion of the role of faith-based organizations in the provision of social services. I left behind some frigid weather in my hometown of Fort Wayne, IN, so I am especially glad to be here in Los Angeles. About 5 of our days equal 1 of these days in temperatures. Many people across this country have a specific image of Los Angeles; that of glitz and glamour and movie stars and the image that comes to mind is not that of the less fortunate. But Los Angeles, as in every other city, has many individuals who are not living a fast and privileged life. I am certain that our witnesses today will help us see the true picture of Los Angeles, where the needs are as well as which organizations and individuals are working to meet those needs. Scores of dedicated men and women open their hearts and homes to the less fortunate each and every day. They do not do this for the glory of public recognition or for the money, but for the simple fact that their faith calls them and demands them to action. They are committed to improving the lives of their neighbors no matter the sacrifice to their own safety and comfort. Often their only reward, which they will tell you is the best reward, is the knowledge that they have restored hope to someone who had been suffering. The men and women who run the countless faith-based social services organizations in neighborhoods all across the country are often the only people willing to tackle the tough problems because frequently the rest of us take an out-of-sight out-of- mind approach to issues that make us uncomfortable. If in the United States we had an unlimited amount of money, we would be able to fund every organization that is effectively providing social services. The hard reality is that we do not have unlimited resources. So we have to find a way to get the dollars we do have into the hands of them who are most effective in the neighborhood. Frequently, that agency is a faith-based organization. Leaders of many of the faith-based agencies I have had the privilege to visit tell me they are successful because they look beyond immediate need. Their focus is helping the client regain hope and changing a life. Fast fixes are not acceptable to these agencies. These men and women truly make a difference not only in the life of the client, but also in the community as a whole. We need to determine how we can best encourage and support the work that they do without asking them to compromise their beliefs. We have been having this discussion in Washington for quite some time. What I find to be the most frustrating is the tendency to lose sight of the reason we are having the discussion in the first place. We know that faith-based organizations are effectively transforming lives and communities. Where the discussion gets bogged down is in the legal questions. We need to refocus the discussion on what makes a faith-based organization successful? What is it that makes them effective? The fact that faith-based organizations are effective is the reason this discussion began in the first place. In other words if the legal requirements make it so they are not as effective, then the argument of why do not they change the legal requirements so that they can still be effective does not work. It is time to listen to all the providers tell us how we can best assist them in their work. I doubt that they think government strings and bureaucratic red tape are something that you actively seek. I believe that one of the best ways we as legislators can help is not by giving you more government strings to deal with, but by helping to facilitate new relationships among the providers of social services and the foundations that provide financial and technical assistance to faith-based and community organizations. Today we have the great opportunity to talk with providers of a range of faith-based services. We need to understand how the unique element of faith impacts the success and structure of these programs. It is also important that we understand how your programs transform lives by building self-confidence and self-esteem. Over the last several months we have heard from faith-based providers in: San Antonio, TX; Nashville, TN; Chicago, IL; Charlotte, NC; here today in Los Angeles; we will be in Colorado in 2 weeks. Our witnesses today represent just a small fraction of the countless faith-based organizations that are meeting the needs of Los Angeles. I expect that our witnesses today will provide us with many valuable insights into their work and the needs of the community. Most importantly, they will help us identify areas and methods by which the Government can best assist community organizations of all types provide the best possible care for people in need. I look very much forward to your testimony. First I need to do a couple of procedural matters for the committee. I ask unanimous consent that all Members have 5 legislative days to submit written statements and questions for the hearing record. That any answers to written questions provided by the witnesses also be included in the record. Without objection, it is so ordered. I also ask unanimous consent that all exhibits, documents and other materials referred to by Members and witnesses may be included in the hearing record, and that all Members be permitted to revise and extend their remarks. Without objection, it is so ordered. Let me briefly describe a little bit how we are going to conduct the hearing and what the hearing is beyond the more formal statement. This is a Government oversight committee. The primary responsibility of this subcommittee is narcotics; about half of our staff works with narcotics. And there we do legislation as well as oversight of the ONDCP and a lot of that. We also have a series of other government agencies that we oversee; Department of Justice, Department of HHS, Department of Education and the Office of Faith-Based Initiatives. I have had a long interest in this subject. My work in the House and Senate staff prior to this was one of the reasons I ran for Congress, because I believed that we were not spending more money and we were not going to be spending a lot more money in social services and that many of the things that would be done in the private sector gave an additive and, in fact, were different and we needed to figure out how we could better utilize and more effectively invest in that sector of the community. It is one of the things that my boss, Dan Coats, initiated in the Senate and that his former speechwriter and policy director Mike Gerson, who is now the President's speechwriter, many of the people who are on our staff are now running these initiatives over at the White House. And we are trying to implement as best we can. I, myself, even though not as part of this committee have carried in the House the four major amendments that have passed that implemented the faith-based things prior to President Bush getting elected. So, for example, in Aid to Families With Dependent Children that allowed faith-based organizations to apply for those grants. Then Senator Ashcroft and Senator Coats carried in the Senate side, I carried down in the House side. Similar in Juvenile Justice. Similar in Drug Treatment and other programs we have tried to expand faith-based organizations. This is separate from the White House faith- based initiative. These things are being done legislatively. But what has happened in that is we have gotten into lots of debates, which we will touch on today, about hiring practices, about a lot of the difficult questions that you get into that make many faith-based organizations back up. Quite frankly, I've had my own doubts working this through as to which is going to wind up driving or helping. Is it going to corrupt the faith-based organizations more than the gain they get? And we need to work that through. But part of what has been lost in this whole debate is why we got into the faith- based argument in the first place. And that was we have not increased in real dollars, we have actually decreased, whether we have Democratic Governors or Republican Governors, whether you have a Democratic Congress or a Republican Congress, there is not more dollars and yet all of us believe that the problems are increasing. So how do we fix it? So what we are doing with this series of hearings, and we will be doing a major report, is trying to talk to people at the grassroots, get an idea for the diversity of faith-based groups, what some of their challenges are, zero in on some of the policy questions. Now, this is an oversight committee. So one of the things we do at the beginning is we have to have people swear or affirm, whatever you are comfortable with, that your testimony is true. So that's our first step. And you have seen this full committee in Washington a lot. Congressman Waxman is the Democratic leader of this committee. We are good friends and it does not mean we always agree on things, but we have been through some very acrimonious periods since the Republicans took over Congress, much of through this committee. So, for example, things like the FBI files, Travelgate, White Water, China, Waco, things that you saw on TV, those witnesses were doing the same thing I am going to ask you, and that is to uphold, and only a few have ever been prosecuted for perjury, and I hope that does not happen at a faith-based hearing, but that is why we go through this is process. This is an oversight hearing where we see whether the laws are being implemented the way Congress passed the laws. We have in this subcommittee, even though we have our disagreements from time-to-time and we have some disagreements on this issue as to how to implement it, normally you could not have hearings without multiple members here. But in our committee we have a good working relationship between the ranking democrat, Elijah Cummings, who heads the Black Caucus and myself so that we can do these hearings without objection from either side and move through the committee process, which enable us to have a lot more field hearings than if you have to arrange for multiple members and do that. And we always accommodate any witness needs, and they know we are having good balanced debates. [The prepared statement of Hon. Mark E. Souder follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.001 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.002 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.003 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.004 Mr. Souder. So with that as an introduction, the first step here is to administer the oath. So if you will raise your right hands. Stand and raise your right hand. [Witnesses sworn.] Mr. Souder. Let the record show that each of the witnesses responded in the affirmative. Now you will be recognized for a 5 minute opening statement. Your full statement will be inserted into the record. Then I will ask questions. If you want to offer additional testimony later on for the hearing book record, you may do that as well. And we will start with Mr. Rudy Carrasco, executive director of the Harambee School in Pasadena, CA. STATEMENTS OF RUDY CARRASCO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE HARAMBEE SCHOOL, PASADENA, CA, AND NUEVA ESPERANZA, INC., AND ESPERANZA USA; LEE dE LEON, TEMPLO CALVARIO; JEFF CARR, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, THE BRESEE FOUNDATION Mr. Carrasco. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. It's a privilege to be here. I'm representing Nueva Esperanza and also I'm the executive director of the Harambee Christian Family Center; two entirely different entities. I am here at the request of Nueva to read their testimony into the record and also willing to answer some questions on behalf of our own work in Pasadena. Esperanza USA is a national association dedicated to serving the needs of Hispanics in America. Founded in 2003 as a wholly owned and operated subsidiary of Nueva Esperanza, Inc., Esperanza USA hosts the National Hispanic Prayer Breakfast and houses all of Nueva Esperanza's national operations. The largest of all Esperanza USA's national programs is the Hispanic Capacity Project. Established with receipt of the second largest grant awarded from the HHS' Compassion Capital Fund, the Hispanic Capacity Project provides technical assistance to Hispanic faith-based and community organizations nationwide helping them identify and meet the needs in their communities. During the first year of the grant, operations were established in Central and southern Florida, southern California, New York City, Philadelphia, northern and southern New Jersey. Over 150 faith-based organizations are participating in the project. These organizations collectively operate over 215 separate service ministries spanning the range of social and human delivery. The Hispanic Capacity Project forms the foundation for all other national initiatives. Other national programs include Hogares de Esperanza (Homes of Hope), Esperanza USA's national home building initiative and Pacto de Esperanza (Pledge of Hope), the first national HIV/ AIDS initiative targeted at the Hispanic faith community. National mortgage counseling and employment programs are currently being developed. Nueva Esperanza, Inc., Esperanza USA's parent organization, is the largest Hispanic faith-based community development corporation in the United States. Founded in 1987 by Reverend Luis Cortes together with Philadelphia's Hispanic Clergy, Nueva operates an impressive array of programs addressing the problems faced by the Hispanic community. Headquartered in Philadelphia, Nueva operates an impressive array of social service and educational programs including a charter high school, a junior college and a campground for inner-city children. Nueva has built and rehabilitated over 100 single-family homes, helped more than 1,700 families obtain their first mortgage and enrolled over 600 individuals in Nueva's job training programs. A $28 million economic development project is underway to create a Latino Corridor in north Philadelphia transforming the vacant lots and abandoned buildings into a vibrant commercial corridor surrounded by new and renovated homes. A tribute to the vision of its leadership, Nueva Esperanza has become one of the leading voices for Hispanic Americans. In developing programs targeted to address the many unmet needs in Philadelphia's Hispanic community, Esperanza USA has become a leader in building Hispanic owned institutions nationwide. The overriding lesson of the past 20 years of providing services in Philadelphia and this past year establishing national operations and working to build the capacity of Hispanic faith-based and community organizations across the country is, simply but very clearly, that public funds can be used effectively by the faith community to deliver services to serve the needy and further serve the public good. When the faith community and the government are brought together as partners, services are delivered more efficiently to those in need. And, most importantly, service delivery takes place well within the confines of the law. An equally important lesson is that a thorough educational process is essential to educate the faith community on the process and the specifics required to adhere to the confines of the law. The Hispanic faith community is a newcomer to the world of Federal funds. In many cases services have been funded in the past solely by private funds. The need to establish and maintain the separation of church and State is often a new concept and a new reality for many. The central purpose of the educational process is to make clear the limits of and restrictions that accompany receipt of Federal resources. The faith community needs to be clear that federally supported faith-based initiatives are not about proselytizing and religious education. Potential program participants can then make an educated choice to participate or not. Should they feel their service delivery would be compromised by restrictions, they can choose not to participate. Should they believe that the good that can be done with the Federal funds outweighs the restrictions, they may choose to participate. This educational process needs to be two-fold, however. The largest obstacle encountered in recent years is the administrative uncertainty about the realities of service delivery within the confines of separation of church and State. Thus, the second fold of the educational process is to educate the various bureaucracies about the realities and genuine benefits of federally funded faith-based programs. Bureaucracies and bureaucrats by definition are risk averse and subject to repeating past patterns of behavior that have not raised concern or criticism. A continued educational process illustrating the success of federally funded faith-based programs and the ease with which the law can be followed is essential if we are to continue to reach those who have been left behind by all previously existing agencies and structures. A second very real obstacle faced most especially by the Hispanic faith community is that ours is a system stacked against those who are not as sophisticated as others with past relationships and experience working with government. Many of the most effective agencies are affiliated with small congregations closely connected to the local community, in touch with individual families' lives; who might be in need but too proud to come in for help. This reality underscores the imperative of finding intermediaries, such as Esperanza USA, who have legitimacy with their constituencies, intermediaries that can navigate the intricacies of Federal rules and guidelines. As we move forward it is critical to identify and ensure access for intermediaries who understand Federal realities and can act as broker on behalf of those unable to compete. It is equally critical that as intermediaries are identified that processes are in place to assure that these intermediaries have true grassroots operations rather than the more traditional Washington-based networks. A third obstacle faced primarily by the Hispanic faith community is the experience of being the ``new kid on the block.'' Other minorities and constituencies have decades of experience receiving Federal funds. With little, if any, increase in funding availability, bureaucracies are faced with a choice--either continue to fund those who have been funded and performed adequately in the past or reduce their funding and take a chance on the ``new kid,'' essentially untested and relatively unknown. More than just our original discussion of the need to educate the bureaucracies, very real policy decisions must be made at the highest levels of government to support the work of those serving the ``new kids on the block.'' Thank you. [The prepared statement of Mr. Carrasco follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.005 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.006 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.007 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.008 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.009 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.010 Mr. Souder. Thank you very much. Now we will hear from Reverend Lee de Leon, Templo Calvario a Community Development Corp. in Santa Ana, CA. Rev. de Leon. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. It is a pleasure to be here with you today to share the many successes of the vast array of Templo Calvario's ministries. Templo Calvario is a congregation based in the city of Santa Ana, CA. Charisma Magazine has recently recognized Templo Calvario as the largest Hispanic church in America. Over 10,000 individuals weekly visit our church to worship and/or to receive assistance from our various outreach ministries. Templo Calvario has a long history of compassion. For over 75 years, the church has ministered to families in need in a variety of ways. Although the church is located in the city of Santa Ana, its benevolent efforts have reached beyond its borders to other cities, States and countries. Cities like Miami, FL have an outreach center planted by one of Templo Calvario's inner city missionaries reaching out to the poor of that city. Ensenada, Mexico and Buenos Aires, Argentina have other missionaries doing the same thing. This long history of compassion comes as a result of the thinking that permeates every heart and mind of Templo Calvario. Regularly you hear members greeting each other with, ``Soy bendicido, para bendecir''--``I am blessed, to bless others.'' Obras de Amor. In 1980, we took steps to formalize our benevolent work by establishing a ministry called Obras de Amor--Works of Love. Obras de Amor weekly: Manages a warehouse that procures and distributes over 90 tons of groceries and other products; provides counseling, referrals, groceries, emergency assistance and other services to over 250 families; provides groceries, clothing, furniture and on occasion funding to a network of over 60 churches and community-based organizations. Angel arrived at our church hungry and unemployed. He was a single 19 year old alcoholic that needed more than food and a referral; he needed direction in his life. He not only received assistance, but he also started volunteering in our warehouse. This provided him the opportunity of receiving needed counseling and basic life skills training. Today Angel is no longer drinking, he is married and working as an apprentice with a plumbing company. The Kingdom Coalition. This network of over 60 churches and community-based organizations extends from Los Angeles to San Diego. These organizations serve over 80,000 individuals each month. These groups provide a multitude of services including food distribution to the hungry, counseling, after school centers, rehab homes, and much more. For the past 2 years we have provided needed training to this network with the assistance of the Christian Reformed World Relief Committee, Nueva Esperanza and the Compassion Capital Fund. After School Centers. Templo Calvario operates three after school centers in the cities of Garden Grove and Santa Ana. Two of these centers are found in high density neighborhoods populated by low income Latino and Asian families that live in crowded apartment buildings. These centers provide homework assistance, tutoring and mentoring for elementary school children. They also coordinate wholesome community building events that target the families of these children. Enrique is a 12 year old that attends our center in the city of Garden Grove, that is the Buena/Clinton Center. He was having a difficult time with math at school. His parents could not provide the help he needed since they do not speak nor read English well and have six other children to look after, one being a pregnant 15 year old. At our center, he was able to get one-on-one tutoring that dramatically improved his grades. Not only that, but he has a brand new goal; he wants to go to college. Other Areas of Service. One is the summer camp. Annually we sponsor teens in those neighborhoods we serve by sending key teens to camp. Back-to-School: Each year we have hundreds of children receiving back packs loaded with school supplies and many receive assistance with school uniforms. Another activity is Holiday of Hope: Over 4,000 children receive Christmas toys every holiday season. Esperanza is another event that we have not been held in a number of years, but this year we are reviving that event. And over 100 faith-based and community-based organizations and local businesses will gather at the Santa Ana Bowl to host a community fair. Templo Calvario Community Development Corp. In November 2002, our board of elders agreed to launch a new corporation that would focus on bringing long-term solutions to our community. Our elders agreed to birth Templo Calvario Community Development Corp. This new corporation will focus on affordable housing; business and job creation; education; senior and youth programs. Since its inception, Templo Calvario CDC has started a Charter School with a 120 students. This is a partnership with the Santa Ana Unified School District. Also the Senior Service Enterprise. Our goal is to have 40 new jobs created by this new entity. This new company will provide home care, transportation and other vital services to seniors of our community. The Office of Community Services has provided a pre-development grant that is helping us bring this business together. Project Esperanza. Our goal is to assist 25 groups annually. This new effort is providing technical assistance to over 25 FBOs and CBOs in our area that service families in the Empowerment Zone of the city of Santa Ana. Technical assistance provided by We Care America and a grant from the Compassion Capital Fund are giving us the support we need to make this project a success. For many years, Marco Tierrablanca has served the youth of Santa Ana by organizing soccer leagues and providing fundraising events to these children to help these children buy their uniforms. But his greatest desire has been to expand his work to the elementary schools of our city. Project Esperanza will help him reach this next level of service to the youth of our community by helping him form his own 501(c)3, establish a formal board, providing training in other critical areas and organize a meeting with school district officials and Mr. Tierrablanca. Some of the obstacles we have faced. For the most part, our city and county partnerships are developing well. But we're still challenged by some agencies at the local level that find it difficult to work with faith-based organizations. Every government employee has their own interpretation of ``separation of church and State'' and because some do not have a handle on it, often we get left out. For example, it is interesting that we in the faith sector very often are better informed of new Federal funding than local funding. I do not understand why we still do not get the emails or mailings that other nonreligious groups receive. Very often we rely on secondhand information to keep abreast of new funding. In the early beginnings of the Faith-based Initiative, there was talk of expediting the application process to gain 501(c)3 status. Well, to date things haven't changed, it is still slow. Our new CDC is still waiting on final approval after many months. This hampers our ability to seek additional funding both from both government and private sources. Also, can anything be done about the high cost of grant writing? So far we've been fortune in this area, but startup groups cannot afford the high fees many writers request. I would encourage you, Mr. Chairman, to investigate the possibility of new funding that would provide training and technical assistance to new startups. And one of the questions that comes to us regularly is are you faith-based or not. And on paper we are not, but we are connected to a local church and we believe that is an expression of our faith, the work that we do. And I know the constant challenge of dealing with those issues. And thank you so much. [The prepared statement of Mr. de Leon follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.011 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.012 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.013 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.014 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.015 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.016 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.017 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.018 Mr. Souder. Thank you for your testimony. Reverend Carr is executive director of the Bresee Foundation Fund. Reverend Carr. Rev. Carr. Thank you. It is good to be here, Mr. Chairman. And I apologize for not having written comments. I was out of town this weekend and just found out on Friday afternoon to be here. But since I do this for a living, it is not hard for me to talk about Bresee Foundation. Bresee Foundation is a 22 year old nonprofit organization that was established by members of Los Angeles First Church of the Nazarene, which is a historic church that has been in central Los Angeles for over 100 years. And it was established in 1982 by members of that local congregation really to focus their outreach and social justice efforts in that local neighborhood. The name Bresee, he was actually the founding pastor of that local congregation in 1985. It was founded in Skid Row Los Angeles. He was a Methodist minister who really left the Methodist church, ironically, because of his commitment to the poor and for some theological distinctions. And really his entire focus was to reach out to poor people in Los Angeles. In 1902 the church had a home for unwed mothers. It provided food and clothing and shelter for the Chinese immigrants who were building the railroads in southern California at the time. And so Monday through Saturday they were working for social justice, they were picketing, they were marching. And on Sundays they were preaching the Good News of the Gospel that people's lives could be different. And so Bresee Foundation was born out of a desire to carry on that rich tradition and to really enable the church to do more than what they thought they had the capacity to do by themselves. One of their first initial programs, the pastor, Dr. Ron Benefield who was a sociologist had a desire to train ministers because he had been exposed to churches around this country in urban neighborhoods that were in transition, and which our neighborhood was. And wanted to train laypeople and young pastors to actually figure out how to deal with a church that they found themselves in in a community like that. I was in the second class of guinea pigs at the Bresee Institute which were brought to try and train us. I had come to go to seminary and we had a program where you actually took in academic course and did a hands-on internship. And the church wanted to reach out to youth in the community. They gave me a 10-speed bicycle and a basketball and sent me to the parks and playgrounds. And that was almost 17 years ago. At the time the foundation had about a $20,000 budget. And it was really a separate organization on paper. Today we have a staff of 26 full-time professional staff. Our budget's about $1.7 million and we serve about 3,500 people annually. And we do that in a number of different ways. First of all, we provide education and career development programs; everything from homework assistance, after school educational programs for young people. We have literacy for children who are severely under performing in terms of their literacy skills and educational skills in school. All the way up through college preparation and college scholarships. And about a third of the staff, the professional staff at Bresee Foundation, are young people who grew up in the neighborhood who have come back we have sent to college. In fact, most of those young people I have known since they were 12 or 13 years old having been there so long. They are now in their 20's and 30's. We also provide technology training assistance. Given the advent of the Internet and the ubiquitousness of technology in our society, we provide a state-of-art technology training center, a cybercafe for low income adults who do not have access to technology to get access to the technology and the training. Have everything from basic introduction to computers all the way up to documentary film making where young people are telling their own stories about our neighborhood rather than whatever they get in the homogenized media on network television. We also provide family support services, everything from counseling and case management for families who are impoverished connecting them not only to the resources within Bresee, but other resources that exist in our community and the over 100 community-based and other partnerships that we have to be able to get people assistance that they need. We also provide leadership in social development training. We have a leadership program for young people. We provide financial literacy, recreational sports and outdoor adventure activities to expose kids to things outside the neighborhood. Our mission is very clear. We say in our mission that God calls us to offer hope and wholeness and to work toward reconciliation and empowerment and justice in our community. Our faith is clear, and yet we are non-sectarian. Our purpose is not to evangelize in a very strict religious sense of the word. Our purpose is to live out our Christian faith and to make our neighborhood more like what we believe God wants it to be. And that goes not only to the personal transformation, but to larger transformation in our neighborhood which has led us to, actually, on Thursday morning we will have the grand opening of a new park. We actually worked with the city of Los Angeles. We vacated a public street and used entirely public money, local and State dollars and actually some Federal dollars that have been passed through, to build an ecology park that will not only increase the green space in what's one of the park's poorest and green space poorest areas of the entire country, but also to do some unique ecological things in terms of reducing urban storm drain run-off in terms of how we designed the park. And also returning it to the way it would it would have been 100 years ago. Actually, our neighborhood was a watershed, if you can believe in central Los Angeles there was such a thing. But it was a watershed. And so we are using all indigenous plants to bring the environment back to the way it used to be. We also in about 4 months will open a primary care clinic; 58 percent of the people in our neighborhood are uninsured and we have a health care crises here in Los Angeles. And our goal is to provide low income children and their adult parents, working poor people who are working who are working but do not have health insurance, give them access to the health care system so they can get preventative and important basic care before those medical situations turn into an emergency. In terms of our funding, about 40 percent of our dollars come from Government grants and contracts. About 35 percent from private foundations and corporations. And then about 13 percent from special events and a mixture of earned income that individuals get. I would simply say about, oh, when I guess President Bush came into office, I think it was about a month after he announced his faith-based initiative, I got a phone call from someone in Washington actually sort of testing the waters and asking me about this whole faith-based initiative. And I must say that really since the beginning in some ways I think it's been a false dichotamy. I hear the people on the left arguing and strenuously debating about the issue of separation of church and State, and even some of the folks to the far right arguing about that as well. And then people if you move in on both sides of that, people who are concerned about various other issues. And then I think really, that most of us kind of live in between. The reality is in some ways the lines between separation of church and State have always been blurred in my opinion. I think those of us who are doing work in the community who receive government funds, we have found a way to navigate those things, the ones who have been able to do that without I think, compromising who we are and yet maintaining the separation and not being sectarian, but at the same time enabling ourselves to be able to get the work done that needs to happen in communities like ours. I think separate 501(c)3 corporations are important, because I think the fun of being a minister and being trained in theology and trained actually to be a pastor and then finding myself in this job, I think the role of the church is in some ways different in the traditional sense of a church provides a place of worship, a place of spiritual accountability, religious education. I think churches, though, that set up a 501(c)3 corporations can appropriately set up a firewall, if you will, between those explicitly religious activities in the sense of sectarian activities but yet still have a nonprofit corporation that is driven and motivated by living out our faith commitments that enables us to do the important work of rebuilding communities and rebuilding the lives of people who find themselves in those communities. I think really the issues to me are more issues about capacity, outcomes and resources. Unfortunately, a lot of pastors, God love them, that I know could not manage their way out of a wet paper bag. And so I am not sure I want to give them money or have the government or anyone else give them money, not because of their faith commitment but because I'm not sure they would know how to manage those resources if they were given to them. Second, I think it is really important about outcomes. I do not care of you are a secular humanist organization or a faith- based organization, the critical thing of importance that I think government and anyone who is providing funding out to be looking at is whether or not people can deliver results that they say they are going to deliver. And I think people of faith can deliver results. I think they can deliver outcomes. Some have the capacity, some need assistance to have that capacity, but I think those can be done. And then the last thing is resources. I think right now one of the greatest challenges is given the priorities of our Federal Government and our State governments, the balancing of budgets in the State, although you all don't have to balance budgets necessarily at the Federal level, but at the State and local government level the budgets are being balanced on the backs of poor people. Bresee Foundation has some government contracts. We lost $275,000 in government money this last year because of balancing acts, both from the loss of Federal funds that were passed through the city, loss of Federal funds that were passed through the State, and then those were reduced for us as well. And meanwhile, the economy has been in the tank, more people are unemployed, more pressure is on poor people and the demand for our services and the demand for the kinds of things we are doing is going up. And so I think we often find ourselves in the crucible of trying to meet the demands of people who are living on the margins of our society and trying to do that on a shoestring. And I think we are pretty savvy, and most faith-based organizations that I know are pretty savvy on how to stretch those dollars better than a lot of other organizations, and yet even us in these times find ourselves faced with really difficult decisions about reducing services or finding ways that we can be able to maintain those services for people. Thank you. Mr. Souder. I thank each of you for your testimony and also for your work. There is a kind of a series of types of questions that I ask, some of which get us into the legal questions in defining, some of which are further defining the organizations and then a few things that you each raise. Let me do kind of some of the technical questions first. Can you tell me again, where the Bresee, right? Rev. Carr. Yes. Mr. Souder. Foundation, it is somewhere here in central Los Angeles? Rev. Carr. Yes. It is located about a mile and a half west of the heart of downtown near Third and Vermont. Mr. Souder. And most of your work is done in that immediate area? Rev. Carr. It is focused in that neighborhood, yes. Mr. Souder. What percentage would you say of the people that you serve are African-American, Hispanic, other backgrounds? Rev. Carr. Yes. Our neighborhood is largely Latino immigrant. People that have come from Central America and other Latin American countries, Mexico, looking for a better life. Probably about 70 percent of the people we serve are Latino, about 15 to 18 percent are African-American, about 7 to 8 percent are Asian Pacific Islander and then a mixture of everything from caucasian to, you know, the metroplex of the world here in Los Angeles. Mr. Souder. Are 100 percent low income in that area or some middle class? Rev. Carr. Yes, in our immediate neighborhood that we serve, 44 percent of the people live at or below the poverty level. So largely from very low income or just above the poverty level, people that would come to our services. Mr. Souder. Mr. Carrasco, one of the things we have been debating going back and forth, or maybe we will wind up doing both if we can get them both in, but either doing a field hearing in Philadelphia or Boston. So you have given us a lot of information that suggests on top of some other groups why we should be looking at Philadelphia and the efforts of the organization there. Could you tell us a little bit about the family center that you work with up in Pasadena as well and how that has really changed the neighborhood and how we deal with the fact that often when we tackle and get an area turned around, the problems move to another area and/or do we solve the problems, in fact the area disappears? Which and how do you balance that? Mr. Carrasco. Right. We are almost victims of our success at the moment. Harambee Center was founded 20 years ago, 1983. At the time we had the highest daytime crime rate in southern California. And the anecdote is that there was a movie called ``American Me'' that came out around 1992 with Edward James Olmas and that portrayed the rise of the Mexican mafia in the California prisons. And the name of the black gang was the BGF, the Black Guerilla Family. In real life the BGF was headquartered in the house where we now do children's Bible clubs and all sorts of activities, where two churches meet. John Perkins and his wife moved in there in 1982 after dealing with the Klan for 22 years in Mississippi. And through their faith they felt they saw God take care of them and respond, started there. And so the neighborhood was just a wild, wild shooting gallery. And you visited in 1985 and then again I think later in 1992, and you saw the changes. I think you could extend it out. What has happened in our community, our efforts yes, but also the police, churches, schools, all sorts of people came together. What was important was to have a person like Perkins who did this pretty courageous thing of buying a home on the corner next to the drug dealers. And so we were rallying point, but there were many agencies that came together. And so we have seen the change. And in Los Angeles, in our particular neighborhood, it went from being about 85 percent African-American, 10/15 percent Latino to about 55 percent Latino now. And in particular, our houses are turning from being renter occupied to owner occupied. Housing prices throughout southern California have just shot up. And so a lot of the families that we work with historically, they used to-- when they would evicted or something crazy would happen in the house, they would actually just rent a block away. Now what happens is that there is less of that rental stock and families simply move. And it is something we have been debating in strategic planning as we think about, you know, what exactly should Harambee do. Because if and when you come and visit, you are going to be kind of shocked because you are going to see a lot of lawns that are nice and green and cut, neighbors talking to each other. We have worked very hard at black and Latino reconciliation. For 7 years John's son Derrik Perkins and I walked the streets together and we said besides whatever we preach, we are going to demonstrate that African- American and Latino can work together and live together. And so there has been a lot of change there. And a lot of the new families are still struggling, especially a lot of Latino immigrant families that will tend to have two or three families in a home. But a lot of the African-Americans we are working with have moved away. In this area, if you are familiar with Los Angeles at all, there is an eastward movement out toward Riverside where Lee's group does a lot of work. Also to Palmdale and Antelope Valley. And we have been tracking these over the years because in our work our vision is 10 to 15 years of development. A kid does not have a father, you can have some programs and, you know, they graduate from high school, they are 19 years old and they still need somebody. That is why the government understood this and came up with the emancipated foster youth concept; a great concept. And now churches and other groups need to realize that people need to land in families. I have a kid who is 22 years old and I thought I was done with him when he was 20 and he went to college. The second day in college he called me up. He did not want money, he did not need anything. But he was hurt deep down, he was afraid and he was lost and I was there for him. And I had just written him off. I had finished my project. So when we are talking about our work at Harambee, long term indigenous leadership development that is exemplified by the great work of Bresee, we are talking about how we find people who are these moving targets. And communities of faith do that. I do not have to explain that to you, and that is just sort of another checklist of why we need to partner with communities of faith. I do not know exactly what we are going to do, because the process continues in Pasadena. The schools are slowly beginning to improve. Crime has gone down. It is a great place to be. We are 15 miles from Los Angeles. Every house that gets purchased is either a Latino immigrant family or we are seeing more white and Asian and other middle class folks who are able to buy these $300,000 houses. So we are trying to figure out exactly long term what our center is supposed to do. There is still a tremendous amount of need. There are still a lot of families in pockets that are not going to go anywhere, especially because a lot of historic African-American and some Latino families own the house, paid it off 20 years ago. And so the kids and the grandkids are going to be there. And so that is a little bit of the thought there. But we are finding, and I do not know who in the region or the State, perhaps even L.A. County area is talking about this, but I do not think this is Harambee's particular vision at the moment. But if I was so inclined, our immediate move, we would leverage our nine properties that Dr. Perkins bought and paid off, $2 to $3 million worth, we would go buy properties in Pamona, in Antelope Valley and we would establish other Harambee Centers in those places that do not have the amount of social services that Los Angeles has, and that we have. And there is tremendous need, but there is a lot of services in his area, same with us. You have areas with heavy population booms. In the Riverside area and in this Palmdale/Lanscaster area that have very few services and do not have any of the sort of history or the base that we have, they do not have the citywide capacity. This is something that we are going to see increasingly throughout the country as we see the Latino migration continues. You know, whatever happens with this immigration bill, I think we are going to continue to see the Latino populations and low income Latino populations growing throughout the 50 States, as well as heavy movement by African- Americans. So there has to be a way that not just the capacity that is built with organizations like ours--I do not even know if this is the Government's role--but that somehow our organizations are also supportive of other groups in those areas that do not have the support to follow through. There is one particular detail that was just--I do not know if we throw it now or later, that no one every talks about is actually a piece of the faith-based initiative that I was most excited about. The President talked about not just working with reforming the bureaucracies in Washington, but talked about getting business and private individuals to give more. So public and private; all the attention has been paid on all this public money. There is tons of corporate money. You know, how does he say it? He said that businesses do not have a church and State problem, but they act like it and they use to sort of squirm out of their civic or corporate responsibility. I have not seen much attention, you know, bully pulpit type of attention being paid on that. With individual giving, I know that it was really difficult to get it through Congress in terms of rate. I do not even know the terminology, but increasing the credit or deduction for contributions to charitable organizations. Harambee Center is entirely privately funded and we have been considering this entire initiative. We are very cautious historically and even now. But something that has sort of used the bully pulpit to encourage businesses, and to encourage individuals to give more, that benefits us tremendously. And I have been disappointed to not see much attention paid there. Mr. Souder. The big problem here is how to keep me disciplined in the questions. But let me go next to Mr. de Leon. Your testimony has been very helpful in clarifying a number of things, and I have lots of different questions. If I do not get them done here, we will do some followup at another point. I want to address some of the things that each of you have raised, too, but I want to make sure I ask the questions I need to get fact-based first. Mr. de Leon, you raised a number--is it Reverend? Rev. de Leon. Yes. Reverend. Mr. Souder. OK. That you raised, particularly toward the end. On your 501(c)(3) you said to date things have not changed as far as expediting. Where is yours held up? Rev. de Leon. I do not know. We have not heard back from the IRS. It has been there a number of months. Mr. Souder. And is---- Rev. de Leon. We did receive a little card indicating that they had received it, but not more than that. Mr. Souder. Did you attend any administration forums out in this area on this faith-based initiative. Rev. de Leon. Yes, there have been. Mr. Souder. And did you attend any of those or did anybody from your church attend any of those? Rev. de Leon. Attend? Mr. Souder. The administration's faith-based forum. And when they did that, did they have any assistance there or suggestions of how people could put together 501(c)(3)'s? Rev. de Leon. I have not attended those sessions, no. Mr. Souder. You have not? Rev. de Leon. They have filled up pretty quick. But basically our attorney just handled us. And the attorney has done well, I mean very good work in the past so I do not see any problem as far as the application and all. I think it is just regular red tape that slowed it down. Mr. Souder. One of the things should be that it does not do us any good to go around and encourage everybody to form one and then have it take so long that they lose enthusiasm. This is something which needs to be followed up. I was trying to figure out what the deal was. Look, I am an unapologetic conservative Republican, so I with trepidation ask this question of Reverend Carr. When you went to the conference did you go yourself? Rev. Carr. Actually, they had one in Los Angeles with the Mayor's office, and I was invited to share our experience, more I think, to encourage others. Mr. Souder. Was it a primary function similar where people share their experience or did they have any technical people there, any suggestions of what people can do? Has there been a followup? Rev. Carr. I did see a lot of technical assistance being provided that day. I saw it as more of a introductory kind of thing to get people to begin to talk about it, at least the one that I was at, at the Mayor's office. Mr. Souder. You also said can anything be done about the high cost of grant writing. One of the things that I'm intrigued with, and I would like all three of your reactions to this, and why you think something like that has not been done before either at the State or local levels, forget Federal for right now, or even at the private sector level and whether you think if the Federal Government did this whether it would be useful? When I was in graduate school and most people know two things about me in Congress. First off, I am outspoken evangelical and second, I'm a Notre Dame Hotdog, which is somewhat different from each other but I went to grad school at Notre Dame. And in the MBA program one of the things through Score and Small Business Centers that you do as part of your curriculum because Notre Dame has a requirement for social activity in the community as part of getting a degree there, is that they have business students go out and as loan applications come in, particularly from the urban areas around South Bend or Elkhart or compared to Los Angeles, these are not urban areas. But they are big urban areas compared to my hometown and others. You go in and you help people who are looking for small business loans and other things. I visited them here in Los Angeles. You have Small Business Centers in job development and entrepreneurial centers that are usually a mix of government funds and private sector funds where as a company wants a startup company, they can go rent space in the building. They have a shared secretary. They have shared phone systems. And then as they get a little bigger, they can move out. The question is why have we not done this in the social service area? In other words, for grant writing, for example, I have been talking to one university in my district about getting a building where the social service organizations, particularly the smaller ones, could pool rent, could pool the secretarial, the copy machines, the fax machines like they do in the business area. That students from the local universities could come over and volunteer, possibly either get credit, whatever, with that. Do you know of anything like this in the social service area? Let me give you another example. When I worked as a staffer in defense contracting, because the area I come from in Indiana is a big defense contractor for parts, probably parts all over the city, that come out of my area. It's auto, truck and defense contracting. Most major defense guys are there, particularly defense electronics. Now one of the things that we do there is line them up with Federal contractors. But not every person. In fact, if anybody can figure out how to read the Federal Register bid process. I mean if you think it is hard in social services, try reading defense. That trying to figure that for 7 days in the month of June they are going to be looking for this kind of bar, a piece of steel and they do not tell you how many they are going to buy or at what price, is confusing. Larger companies have people who do this the whole time. But smaller companies have banded together, and we did it through Job Training Partnership Act for a while where we have brought the grant book in there. We jointly through the job training program and pooled money paid the person who looked for and then tried to identify small contractors who could go out and bid for defense contracts. Why is this not done in social services? And what are the flaws to this being a proposal from us as one of the things the government should be looking at? In other words, because this is a classic thing. Unless you are great big and even if you are great big, it is confusing. Rev. de Leon. I am just concerned with startups. And people just getting going in the process. First of all, I mean the struggle getting your status. And second, the whole faith-based initiative has initiated something within our community that all of a sudden these little businesses are starting up left and right, grant writer are getting going just in time and asking for just enormous fees. Mr. Souder. Like the University of California system said each of our branches we are going to have in the business department or the sociology department an outreach program where students can help hook up and the university system will buy the Federal Register grant books, make them available at one place? Rev. de Leon. Well, it's not being done that I know of. Mr. Souder. Have you heard of anything similar? Rev. Carr. I mean, part of the issue is grant writing, but what we are really talking about is it is not just grant rates. Organizational capacity. And I think, because when we were first getting started it was not just grant writing, but it was management, it was accounting principles, it was all that kinds of stuff. There is a great example here in Los Angeles, it is an organization called Community Partners, which is really a nonprofit incubator. And it was set up that way. They have over 180 projects, I believe, presently. And it is basically a place where someone comes with an idea, which is how all nonprofits start, about wanting to address some particular problem, they have an internal process then as to how they will determine whether or not to take on a project. Mr. Souder. And who is this group? Rev. Carr. It's called Community Partners. It is not a faith-based group. A guy named Paul Vandeventer who actually was a program officer for the California Kidney Foundation and did some other philanthropy work. I think from his experience of having grantees come to him, said you know a lot of people need kind of that capacity support. And so he started, I believe it was about 11 years ago, this Community Partners which was kind of this nonprofit incubator. And I think it is a wonderful example in Los Angeles of where people with ideas and people who really want to focus their efforts on kind of the grassroots work do not get bogged down completely by the requirements, be it in terms of reporting your 990, you know, filing all that kind of stuff. They provide that kind of institutional support. And then as the programs grow over time and decide they kind of want to move out on their own, then they are able to launch out onto their own once they feel like they have the capacity to do that. And I do think that is a fabulous model that ought to be replicated. Mr. Souder. We will get the information. Rev. Carr. Yes. Mr. Souder. Because I want to followup and see whether there is something that we could try to encourage or try to develop that would also include faith-based. Let me ask you another question. In that incubator model, without trying to pick on it because we are holding it up as an example, one thing you get; I do not want to be like an attorney who is afraid to ask a question that I do not know the answer to. But is that group fairly widely known or accessible to small black and Hispanic groups as well as larger organizations? Rev. Carr. Yes. Actually, I mean it is really designed to help the grassroots group and they are very diverse in terms of the people. Mr. Souder. Well, that is a model. Part of what was behind establishing the faith-based initiative, I'm going to digress and make a couple of comments with this so then we kind of zero in on the, also got to watch the clock, zero in on where I wanted to head with a couple of the questions and what we are looking at, trying to point toward. Because you all have thought about the subject some and have seen pretty much the enormity of the problem. Let me ask you another technical question first before I get into the legal question. Let me just go down the row. Do you require a statement of faith before somebody works in any of your projects? In other words, would you hire a Muslim in your organization? Rev. de Leon. Well, we have the two 501(c)(3)'s, I mean one developed and the other one established. So certainly on the church side no. And on the non-religious side, we will accept applications from just anyone. Mr. Souder. Because there is a lot of misunderstanding. By law everybody has to cover anybody who comes in. But one of the fundamental questions and one of the reasons that many of us believe you have to have a 501(c)(3) is it is clearly not going to get, it is absolutely clear, but there are going to be more restrictions if it's going to a church than a 501(c)(3). So you have a 501(c)(3) that is separated. The 501(c)(3) you are talking about that has not been cleared is for the CDC? Rev. de Leon. Correct, yes. Mr. Souder. And so are all the ministries you refer to, the outreach programs you refer to part of the 501(c)(3) that does not have the hiring? Rev. de Leon. The ones that were mentioned, the charter school, the senior business enterprise; those are under the CDC. The other after school centers are under the church, yes. Mr. Souder. So there you would have a statement of faith requirement for your staff? Rev. de Leon. Right. Mr. Souder. Let me ask you a question. Well, now I am going to step back a second before I move through the rest of these questions. So you understand, this is why the legal question becomes important. When we move forward with different faith-based initiatives, I mean the truth is for 20 or 30 years faith-based groups have been getting funding. That has not been the question. And let me be real blunt. The implementation of the legal initiatives have been erratic over the years on hiring questions and so on. Because the first area was homeless. The first area was actually AIDS and AIDS homelessness. And the only groups in the early 1980's that took them were faith-based groups. This is how it started under HUD under Reagan and major faith-based funding because people who did not have faith, they thought if they caught AIDS and died, some of the only people that would take it was faith-based. So nobody cared who they hired. They did not care if they were all Christians and had a statement of faith because nobody would take care of people with AIDS. Then it started in the homeless area. And under HUD they had a major homeless initiative where they did not ask the legal questions. Furthermore, we can argue about why this is, but historically the Hispanic and Black community have been treated somewhat differently in this category than the White community on the grounds that faith is part of their culture and therefore they had more flexibility in government grants. So that while grants going to, for lack of a better word, anglo groups had one set of legal scrutiny, things that were going to Black and Hispanic groups had less legal scrutiny. As we have now moved into competitive areas, specifically drug treatment where unlike AIDS and homelessness you had people who wanted the government funds, now they want to know precisely what is being done and if the law which was a danger during one broad bill like the President proposed as opposed to doing it agency-by-agency, now we are being asked legal questions and going back to things that nobody has questioned before. Let me give you an example. The classic questions are statement of faith. This also means what about if you were part of a faith group that believed homosexuality was a sin and you had a person who was a known open homosexual on the staff? What about, and this really gets into the question of drug treatment, if you had somebody that you knew from your church and other people told you was distributing narcotics but they had not been convicted in a court of law, would you fire them? If you have a Federal grant, you cannot unless it has been proven in a court of law. But a church would view it as compromising their integrity. For example, somebody who is supposedly beating his wife is in family counseling in the church but she has never filed a suit, you cannot take them out of a family counseling center. Your rules under government funds are different than under other funds. This is where the rubber really starts to hit the road. This is not just a statement of faith. This is even a 501(c)(3), an outreach of your church such that some of those things are beyond a statement of faith and if those kind of restrictions start to come in because of legal scrutiny because we are now in battlegrounds where other people want the money, bottom line, now how does that impact a 501(c)(3)? Because there is no question of this. If the group has nothing that is unique to their faith, in other words hiring practices, requiring a prayer at the start of the meeting, requiring them to go to Bible study; if there is nothing unique to their faith, you are not applying as a faith-based group. You are just applying as a group for a grant, which is not wrong. You could have different arms of the same ministry under the same roof, some of which you very accurately in my opinion described. Giving out a shot to somebody, you can be motivated by faith to give the shot, but it is not a faith-based requirement with it. But quite frankly, so could somebody working for the government who is giving a shot, be it a Christian who is working for the government because they wanted to give shots to the poor. Your organization is really no different than a government organization, per se, in doing that. You can have a Christian who works for the government, you can have a Christian who works for your group. The question is are there unique things in your ministry that even in a 501(c)(3) is going to get us into some of these legal questions? Rev. Carr. First of all, we do not have a statement of faith for our hiring practices, but we do have you have to basically agree to our vision, mission and values, which are very faith oriented. And so we would ask someone in an interview, for example, let us talk about our vision, mission and values. Are these vision, mission and values that you can support that are embodied in who you are as a person? And so we have a conversation about that. And that certainly does have an influence on who we hire and we do not hire? Mr. Souder. Could you make sure that we get a copy of your vision, mission and values? Rev. Carr. Sure. Mr. Souder. And that is one thing I want to run through legal counsel as we start to look at this. And we will identify where it is. Rev. Carr. Right. Mr. Souder. But just to see, because that is the kind of thing we need to know because we get too many organizations hooked into any Federal funding with this type of thing. Rev. Carr. Yes. Mr. Souder. Because this looks like it could be a compromise. So in other words, if there is nothing uniquely that separates, for example, Muslim, Buddhist, Christian and Jewish groups for example, you do not beat your wife, you are not using narcotics. Rev. Carr. Right. Mr. Souder. You are to help other people. We might cover some of the categories. Homosexuality is still going to be a hot thing. Rev. Carr. Yes. We have people, you know, everything under the sun in terms of protestant Christians, Catholics, Jewish folks and I feel like it is a good place for us to be. But everyone is clear, we are there because of our faith and because of these vision, mission and values. Mr. Souder. On the health clinic side? Rev. Carr. In everything. We do not divide out, spin out this portion. Mr. Souder. So would you hire a Muslim at the health clinic? Rev. Carr. If they would support the vision, mission and values of our organization, if they could say that this is something that I commit to. Mr. Souder. Is there anything in that, that suggests upholding, you started out with God. Rev. Carr. God calls us to offer hope and wholeness and work toward reconciliation and empowerment and justice. Mr. Souder. That's pretty broad. Rev. Carr. It is fairly broad, yes. And purposely we have not defined a very narrow, even though our roots are evangelical Christianity, we have not defined a very narrow evangelical mission statement because we want to have a broader group of folks who can work with us and share in terms of this work. Mr. Souder. It is not clear where we are heading as a country whether even God will survive in the Pledge of Allegiance, for example, and the court case. That is going to be really interesting. Because if it is not upheld in the Pledge, which is indeed for kids which is a little different in many cases, but even that is considered, and we have several legal battles inside the court system that are going on. One is between kind of very conservative protestants and Catholics and Orthodox Jews and Muslims who tend to want to be able to have a statement of faith versus more liberal branches of all those religions. Rev. Carr. Right. Mr. Souder. And then you have the whole group that does not want any acknowledgement of any higher power, basically secular humanism. Rev. Carr. Right. Mr. Souder. Which is really the predominate court case route right now as opposed to the kind of the religious movement argument we are having. Mr. Carrasco, what is some of your reaction to this? Mr. Carrasco. This entire discussion is why we have stayed away from government money all these years. Now, it is something where we are exploring because the initiative came along. I am familiar with the sorts of things that Jeff has described. And even in our articles of incorporation the lawyer who drew that up, he just looked at me and said this is the most brilliant document he has ever seen. You can do everything and nothing with this language right here. As you stated, and Jeff and Lee, we have that capacity to flex and move. We are kind of a prickly group. I mean, I think our longevity is partly based on our ability to make these strong decisions promptly that we feel a need to happen. So I am often letting Christians go because they do not quite fit in with the vision of our organization from the staff. So anybody else who comes in, we reserve the complete right and freedom to do exactly as we choose, and that includes kids and families and anybody else who steps on the property. And again, that said, our school is separately incorporated. And the center is religiously incorporated. The school is not. And so the school, if and when we do move forward with Federal funding or government funding, it will probably be the school that makes the first foray there. And then we are just going to test the waters. I have been listening very closely to Jeff's testimony here. And we have not run into anything yet, though. Mr. Souder. Let me suggest a couple of things we are really looking at in this report, and you all have touched on all of them. Rev. Carr. Could I just add one more thing to this whole, because it sounds like you are going to move on? Mr. Souder. Yes. Rev. Carr. I know, I read the papers enough and listen to enough people. I know there is this raging conversation about this. But in our neighborhood, I mean everyone from local elected officials and State and government officials to government bureaucrats in Los Angeles, now maybe we have been around long enough where we have nurtured those relationships. My business card says Reverend Jeff Carr. With every grant proposal we ever send, we send in our vision, mission and values because we want people to know what those are. We are not struggling with this argument. No one is coming to us and saying, you know, you are a reverend. You know, are you trying to do anything subversive here. Most people are like, you know, thank God you are in this neighborhood trying to work to change. And the fact that you have lived and worked in that neighborhood, because I have lived about 10 blocks from the center for 16\1/2\ years, they are more enthralled with that because they know that somebody is serious about change than they get all bent out of shape about this whole dichotomy of faith. So just to kind of give you a reality check that on the ground, at least in my neighborhood, that is working. Mr. Souder. That is extremely important to put into the record. And once again, it is extremely important to identify and make it clear to anybody who reads this hearing report what your neighborhood is. Your neighborhood is basically a resource challenged low income neighborhood where not a lot of people are running to try to put the money in, so you are an additive? Rev. Carr. Sure. Mr. Souder. Where we run into the problem, once we start to go into the government programs, is if it becomes a competition for where the money is going to go. To protect large groups of money outside of your neighborhood, they are going to, if necessary, come back and reach into Reverend on your card. Rev. Carr. Yes. I mean, we compete for some of those dollars right now. Mr. Souder. Well, I mean if it is not you competing heavily. Rev. Carr. Right. Mr. Souder. And where this really started to get tough is when it started to go into Head Start, when we started to go into drug treatment, when we started to go even into juvenile delinquency where there are much larger bureaucracies and that they realized that 70 percent of their money could be endangered by faith-based groups. Because there is no political and not much rationale to the opposition that is developed to the narrow tardiness of the faith-based program. Like you say, why would people be against it? Because in the local neighborhoods there is not the opposition. So the question is, how did this opposition arise? But it is intense. And furthermore, it is Constitutional at this point. And that the first group in your neighborhood that gets a multi- hundred thousand dollar lawsuit thrown at them because they have Reverend on the card, the rest of them will be chilled. And that is what is happening in part of the country and what we are trying to figure through. Because there is going to be a couple of guinea pig cases here around the country. One of the goals should be, do not be it. Rev. Carr. Maybe I should not have been here today, huh? Mr. Souder. No. And I do not think they will. I do not want to get too deeply into the legal thing here because I want to test some other ideas with the time here. One was this incubator grant writing, and you have given us a great name here to pursue. Mr. Carrasco. When the President came and the---- Mr. Souder. Steve Goldsmith from my home State was supposed to be initiating that. For a number of reasons they ran into some roadblocks, one of which was the corporations were extremely jumpy in the lawsuit area and all you have to do, if I have said it twice, I am going to mention it again. All you have to do is say the word homosexual around any business organization in the United States right now, major philanthropy, and they will just turn white as a sheet. Because this is a public argument that they do not want to engage in, hiring practices. And so second, if you mention the word Jesus you will see them turn just as white; God a little less. But what we have learned early on in the corporate philanthropy movement is we were actually fighting as big or bigger as we were in the government side. Now that is to say that individuals---- Mr. Carrasco. Because of the fear of lawsuits? Mr. Souder. Fear of lawsuits, but even more so, fear of letters, boycotts, protests, being seen as a religious right wing organization when they are trying to sell the product to everybody everywhere in the world and large communities. In getting the biggest trusts, Ford Foundation, Lilly Endowment; those big foundations in the country tend to earmark. Now, what has happened is the foundation movement has split and you have Philanthropy Roundtable and other foundations that are more willing to do this. But what has to be part of our initiative is how to match private sector resources with this. Now part of what I have been brainstorming and I know they are in the administration, too, is how would you have fair analysis done of this dilemma? In other words, one way to do this would be to have the regional meetings that the administration does. This would not even have to have anything come out of Congress, the administration could just do regional capital resource management meetings around the country with foundations and bring people in. How would you do it? If you want to submit anything written to us, suggestions on what would you do to identify what you so correctly called capacity, the resource and outcome orientation. Lilly's in my home State. They're mostly tied to home State, but they are now about the second biggest foundation in the country. But let us say that Lilly came in. They have not been in Los Angeles. There are 1,000 groups that come to this meeting. What kind of checklist, how would you have a process implemented so they could sort out who is the hustle and what is real? Mr. Carrasco. Yes. I think that this intermediary concept plays out. Is just critical. So that my interest in Nueva, I am not a staffer, I am not a board member. And these are friends of mine and I have followed this movement very closely. And its uniqueness is that it is hitting a sector that simply was never hit, Hispanic churches. And capacity building was the very appropriate thing because some groups should take the money, some should not. As Jeff said, I mean whether it is public or private dollars, do you want to slip these folks any cash or not? Are they going to handle it well? And there is no way around the fact that they are going to have to build capacity. There are no ifs, ands or buts. I do not care who are, where you are coming from. Either you are going to manage the money or you are not. Now that is where these intermediaries come in. Nueva comes in and all the basic argument that there is a certain amount of trust built in because they shared safe ethnicity. And so there are a lot of groups that merge with another example. The Community Partners thought. I would say that there are some groups that are not even ready for the Community Partners. And so you describe this group that can come together and in various parts of the organization can provide support. My feeling with Community Partners is that they do a good job and they are kind of mid to high level. There are a lot of groups that would not even make it in there. So the idea that a school like an Azusa Pacific or Fuller Seminary or a local college, Cal Tech has for some of the grad students as you were talking about with the business school, these certain projects to go in and to sort of walk hand-in- hand with the group. This is tremendously important because eventually that group is going to be able to walk into Community Partners with some confidence in knowing what they need to do. So there are stages of intermediaries that are needed. And so when a Lilly hits the ground, I would hope, and I am just learning this also. We were just rejected for a foundation grant. We expect to get it next year. They said simply we just did not have enough staff to do a thorough evaluation of your group so we had to say no because we had not done our leg work. It is going to be very hard for Lilly or anyone else to come into Los Angeles and to be able to go into the community and identify all those little, little groups. So we need multiple intermediaries. We cannot just rely on Nueva. And there are other groups that are around there. And these people are sort of doing the vetting and making sure that folks in groups are legitimate. Mr. Souder. Because the scrutiny is going to be overwhelming from the media. The first couple of people rip it off. Mr. Carrasco. Yes. Right. Rev. Carr. And I think Community Partners, the good thing and, really, I have known Paul for 10 years since I met him before he first started that. But they not only provide the incubator services, but they also provide technical assistance. A lot of the support they actually generate from other foundations and government grants is to do technical assistance for providers out there, for people who are trying to get these resources. I mean, actually to respond a little bit to Rudy. I know a guy who had an idea. It was called College Match. He wanted to help kind of your second tier of kids from really lousy inner city schools get into really good colleges, your really high end private liberal arts colleges, and stuff like that. It was an idea. He came and talked to me first. He did not have all the capacity and the infrastructure to start that up. I sent him to Community Partners. He went to Community Partners. He proposed his idea. He has a good concept of what he wanted to do. He became one of their sponsored projects. So now any money he raises, you know, it goes to his fiscal agent. They take a certain amount, a percentage for capacity, fill out and file his 990 form. And so it is a great deal for him. As that program grows, if he chooses for it to grow and he wants to take on the capacity, then he can do that. But I think one of the challenges, I have been at Bresee since we had $20,000 and had a half time staff person at Bresee and a half time, it was split between the church and Bresee. It took us a long time to develop that capacity. And in some ways it pulled people like myself who were doing, you know, I was on the streets everyday with kids for the first 7 years. I had to make a decision at some point. Either I had to help the organization develop capacity which pulled me away from what I loved and what I was good at, which was working with really hard core teenagers and pull that away and build some capacity in the organization so that we would be able to help more teenagers or just continue doing what I do. Mr. Souder. Well, we had one witness at our Charlotte hearing who was really tremendous, and that was one of his themes. And he had looked at one of the other witnesses and said, and part of the reason one of the other witnesses saying they were resource challenged is because you really have a heart for helping people, you do not have a heart to be the head of the organization. Because if you wanted to be the head of the organization, you have to be willing to raise money and build leadership. Rev. Carr. That is right. Mr. Souder. And that is part of what I know. I know Taylor, IN is doing a lot of this with different groups in reaching in and trying to build capacity. It has to be more capacity. Sometimes I think some of this current leadership stuff is a little bit fluffy to somebody who has an MBA, but you also have to have accounting leadership, how you do the financial, how you do recruitment, how you have accountability. I wanted to followup with the other thing you had, Mr. de Leon, this Esperanza. Rev. de Leon. The project? Mr. Souder. Yes. Could you describe, because one of the other things that Les Linkosky when he was head of Americorp and John Bresland, although I think he's still at Peace Corps, came to me with proposing my district run a test on this, and we have not yet. But to run almost like a volunteer fair where you would have some of the government agencies in, so you know you've got some credibility and some screening with it. We put in the new Americorp Bill that faith-based organizations are eligible. That one of the things that Americorp is supposed to be oriented toward is not just paying the volunteers, but paying the coordinators for the volunteers. Because often you have the volunteers, you just do not have anybody who wants to say who is going to go which days and how it is going to be organized. Similar things with Peace Corps, Vista and so on. Could you describe what you are talking about in yours as to where a similar type thing, where we bring in the different organizations, where you would promote it in the churches and in the community to say look, here are different organizations looking for volunteers that would do different things. Or you could promote it from a services standpoint of here are different people who provide different services in the community, come in and if you are a potential utilizer of the services. This is a concept that we have been rattling around with. Could you describe what you are talking about? Rev. de Leon. Well, the event is basically focused at the community and trying to bring the community in, expose them to what community-based and faith-based groups do. And it is coordinated by faith-based groups, primarily our church. And in the past we were having up to 100 different community groups come together and do that. So it is a great opportunity. Mr. Souder. Looking for volunteers? Rev. de Leon. No. The focus was not to gather volunteers. It was to expose the community to some of the community services, right. Mr. Souder. So it was not necessarily even, say, somebody who was homeless would not come in trying to figure out who provides services? Rev. de Leon. Yes, yes, yes. Mr. Souder. So it was service oriented? Rev. de Leon. Service providers in our community just letting the public know what they were about, what they were doing. And the service providers are excited about events like that because it helps them, you know, reach out to the public. We also just did a big give away of toys, gifts of different kinds and food. So it was very attractive to the surrounding community. But it also, because it is a long planning process, it is a way of bringing the various service providers together. It exposes some of the non-religious, non- faith-based groups to faith-based groups in their community and what they are doing. So it was community building. It is a great event. But we are not trying, you know, some individuals find organizations that they want to continue to be a part of. We do mobilize over a 1,000 volunteers to put on the event. Last time we did it we had about 1,400, 1,500 volunteers just to host the event. And it is done at the local stadium. Mr. Souder. It is not to say that you could not do multiple things at the same thing? In other words, you might have some people that are looking for services, others just curious in the community, some looking for a place to volunteer. And then you always hope you can have one or two people and they are big donors coming in incognito to look for some organization that strikes their fancy. Let me ask, Bob Woodson years ago raised this to me and I raise it and watch everybody get upset and tell me all the reasons why it cannot work. But it still drives at a point, and I would like your reactions to it. And that is the zip code test with a certain amount of our grants. That you do not get the grant unless you live in a zip code where the grant is being implemented. Mr. Carrasco. If you are the head of the agency or what do you mean? Mr. Souder. This is something you could have a great Federal idea, say we are going to do a zip code test, and then obviously that is the question. Part of the problem is for years and when I first became the Family Committee's Republican staff director years ago, Bob told me don't be a typical White guy who sits on your duff and tries to figure out what is going on in the urban centers and figure out your solution. Go out and listen to the people. And one of the things you clearly see is effective groups are based in their neighborhoods. So the question comes how do we match that up? And you can tell a lot of times they would say, or Gene Rivers in Boston is a big proponent of this whose staff told me we can always tell who got the government grants. They come in here 9 to 5. You can see them wandering through the neighborhood. Then about 5 or 6 they go back out to the suburbs while we are left with trying to fix the pieces because the real problems here occur between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m. and not 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. I have seen that and heard that all over the country. So how do we address that in our government grants? Is one way, yes, maybe the head of the organization doesn't. But does a certain percentage of the staff have to live there? How do you address, because that leads to a very explosive thing in these kind of debates, which you raised earlier, which is indigenous leadership from the community who are responsive to the community. Anybody want to tackle those? Mr. Carrasco. I have never even imagined anybody trying to deal with that problem. And we just know anecdotally from our experience that, you know, this whole idea of poverty pimping and there are people who come around and get the money, do a few things and leave. I mean, philosophically we share a lot with Bresee. I live next to the corner liquor store, bought the house. Have been there for 13 years. And so when we measure effectiveness or even when I evaluate who I am going to partner with, that is one of my tests. I have never even imagined that at a Federal level or a government level that that would be required. Certainly for effectiveness it would jump through the roof. Now whether or not you should do that, I do not know. Rev. Carr. I would welcome it. We would be more competitive than we are now. Because about 70 percent of our staff lives in our service area, and I own a house. Mr. Souder. Would you not estimate from watching that the reverse is true for most programs that are federally funded? Rev. Carr. Yes. I do not know. Well, not necessarily Federal funding. I think a lot of people do not want to relocate or to stay in a neighborhood that has very challenging circumstances. But, again, I think for Rudy and I, I know this because we know each other and we have talked, I mean the reason I live in the neighborhood where I have worked and always have, is because that is part of my faith commitment. I mean, that is a direct result of trying to be incarnational in my approach of saying that, you know, if I am going to be in this neighborhood and I am going to try and solve the problems in this neighborhood, I cannot solve those problems from a distance. Mr. Souder. Freddie Garcia believes his ministry would have collapsed if after it got successful he would have moved out. Rev. Carr. Yes. My kids, I mean I will be really honest with you. My son is 4\1/2\, he starts kindergarten in the fall. And we are struggling with where he is going to go to school because we are committed to public education. Because I do not want to just talk about it, we've got to figure out a way to change the public schools and then disengage from the public schools by putting my kid in some hooty tooty private school someplace. I am trying to figure out how am I going to navigate with my son and not make my son and my daughter, who is 16 months old, an example because of my faith commitments and my work and what I am trying to accomplish in the neighborhood. But that makes it when on my professional side I am trying to figure out how to transform the L.A. public school system as it exists in my local neighborhood, you had better darn well believe I care about that. You had better darn well believe I care about drive by shootings in my neighborhood because I do not want my kids to get picked off by that. I care about the fact that we get more parks in our neighborhood because there is no place for my kid to play. The park that is going in on Thursday, my son is as excited as anybody in the neighborhood. Because he has been watching from day one. ``Daddy, I am going to have a place to play on Thursday.'' Well, that makes a fundamental difference in how you approach the work. I mean, it is not just 9 to 5 and then I go home to my nice quiet little suburb. This is my life 24/7. You know, I hear the helicopters every night. And so, you know, I think that does make a fundamental difference. I mean you can see my emotion just getting more revved up just talking about it. And I think people who do experience and live that, that does make a fundamental difference. Mr. Carrasco. And maybe in the course of the scoring of a proposal, I do not know. Somebody held me here. But maybe there are a few points added if principals or certain percentage live in the zip code test. I know that at least for the Compassion Capital Fund there were certain points if you had a faith-based partner or were faith-based and you are actually penalized in that process if you did not. So maybe perhaps something similar to the zip code test would help. I did not want to cut you off. Rev. de Leon. No. But like in Rudy's case, you know, at this point it would work, but what in the future if he moves out to Pamona and sits in another base somewhere else, spreads himself? In our case, we work in two or three cities. I guess you could require a percentage of the staff to live in that particular community. Mr. Souder. I am trying to figure out a typical government way of trying to figure out a macro answer to a question. But it is, I believe, one of the bigger problems that we are dealing with, and that is that if you accept the principle that the most effective groups are in the neighborhood living there and understand the problems, why aren't the dollars getting there? One is the capacity building of the people who are there so they know where the grants are, but also how to implement grants, what kind of paperwork we require because it is now taxpayer's money or outside investor's money, not your own money. And the second thing is then how they stay there and this money does not even have all these levels of bureaucracy to take the money off before it gets down to the community. So we may appropriate $100 million. By the time it gets to the neighborhood, it is $10 million. Somehow trying to wrestle with this question. I know we are at the heart of a big question, but how to fix that is really challenging. One of my friends under the Reagan administration tried to implement much more flexibility, quick grant applications and what they found was then they got hustled, had a bunch of breakdowns, news media stories on people who cheated because they saw that the accounting and the background was not as much, and set back the whole program. And this is our dilemma of how much kind of white middle class regulation business school accounting to put on people who are motivated by heart and service in the neighborhoods. And somehow we get the balance ever so often over the direction why should we now, which is more bureaucratic. We are trying to do kind of like the Sal Linsky neighborhood type of things again in a secular version of it and how do we do that in the country? And that is partly what the people who initiated this initiative in the administration and in the legislature are interested in. Is this is not some kind of broad suburban approach? This is really how do we impact the poor. And when the program got off into the impression that this is how to help, I am not a critic, but how this could help Jerry Falwall and Pat Robertson, that is not what this program is about. But if we are not careful, it just gets clocked in like every other program. And the question is how do we get it into the dollars where it is supposed to go. Any of you want to make closing comments, and that will be the end of this panel. Rev. de Leon. No. And I think that's a really good point. You know, very often the residents, the stakeholders are left out of the plans that are being made for their own community. It is an outsider coming in with the answer. You know, usually the residents are people that are being effected, but the needs in their community are not heard, they are not listened to. So I would encourage that. You know, I would probably go with the percentage on the staff. Going back to the hiring, just so you know, we require that the members of our board and, I mean we are not all exclusive. I mean the board members, we have some Christians on the board, just people that are active in our community. So we have not been challenged as Jeff mentioned. We have not been challenged by that. We are pretty open. We do understand where there are areas of concern and areas that we have to protect that are very closely connected to the church and the work that we do. But certainly setting up a 501(c)(3) that as non-religious does require navigation. Mr. Souder. And if you are going to have a prayer in the non-religious part, I agree that this amendment as we are moving it through in Head Start and some of the education things and after school programs, that if you want to have a prayer, you can have your prayer before the meeting starts and tell people you're going to have a prayer group before the meeting starts, then have your thing that gets the government funding. And then if they want to ask you about your faith, you don't have to do that by beating them over the head with a stick. You can say well why don't you talk to me about that later. There is a legal model and the question is, is this going to be held up. And it is one that I am not particularly happy with, but Planned Parenthood gets family planning funding, and they do their abortion counseling in the same building but in another part. And the courts have upheld that's not abortion funding because the part that is getting their family planning money is not doing abortion counseling because it is done across the hall. Now that same principle can be used in faith- based if in fact---- Rev. de Leon. That's right. Mr. Souder [continuing]. You have it set up. It helps pay the rent, can help pay the overhead. The court has one regional ruling but it has not been upheld by the Supreme Court yet, and that the computer does not proselytize, the software proselytize. That's the principle that Catholic schools can get their buses paid for. It is a principle that you can get certain hardware into an overtly religious organization. But what we are getting into is where does software start in this? What about if it is a required uniform? What about the textbooks? What about if it is a math textbook? What is the composition of your board? These are new questions that we are at the edges of, the legal has not been sorted out. But it has made me very nervous that it is going to be even more broadly defined. But we are working this through. And as this panel has so eloquently pointed out and what we are trying to work through is we often hear the Federal debate just about the Federal money; that's part of it. Faith-based groups have been part of that for a long time. And the only question here is what could they become if there were choices? Could you have one of your choices be overtly religious for drug treatment if there are other choices? I do not believe the court will uphold it otherwise. Should you be allowed to actually belong to a drug treatment program where they require prayer as part of it if you have a choice of another drug treatment program? I do not believe it will hold up if there is not a choice. But beyond that, there is a lot more to the faith-based initiative than that. The training for the different groups in capacity building, the tax credit which has already been upheld by the courts which enable you to increase donors, matching up with the different foundation groups in the private sector groups, trying to figure out, and we did not even get into legal liabilities of staff. And all the insurance problems that come on non-profit groups as we get into some of these areas on child abuse, spouse abuse, drug treatment, family counseling and potential liability reform. There are a whole bunch of areas we are working with and you have helped us forward that debate. Any closing comments from the rest of you? Mr. Carrasco. Just to introduce you to a guy named Ron in my neighborhood. He is a two time felon, almost got his third strike. In California you go to jail forever. Turned his life around as a Christian. Still will not get hired anywhere because of his record. Volunteered with us for a little while. Got a hold of a van. It has been really tough. And there is no way, as I said before, I do not think there is any way around the fact that he is going to have to learn, whether it is capacity building to earn trust, managing financials, managing volunteers, managing an organization for what he wants to do. And so it is slow going. Meanwhile, he is in that van and he goes into the worst projects. He knows everybody and he picks up the kids, and he is sticking with them. We talked about refocusing it back on the people. I am excited about that guy. We are working. We are doing what we can. We did not take any government money. We even lost a grant because of him. He had a bad rep in town. He used to go up and holler at the mayor and the police chief. We actually lost, I think, $30,000 sticking with him. But he just came along. I think what we did, we did not build his capacity technically, but we roped off his rough edges. We taught him how to quit being such a rough edge guy. And he is going to need Community Partners and other groups like that. Just a story. Just to throw it in there on the record and help us keep our eyes on the folks who are really doing the work. Rev. Carr. I guess I would just finish by saying it seems to me that part of what we are not about or what we are about is to build the capacity of the people in the neighborhood. And the neighborhoods will never get better unless we build the capacity in the people. So it is incumbent upon me, it has been incumbent on me for the last almost 17 years, to figure out how to navigate all this stuff. Well, someday Jeff Carr is going to be gone. I've got about 23 more years I want to give my life to that neighborhood. But after that, if I have not developed the capacity in some other people, some of the young people that we sent to college to get them educated for that very purpose and we have not indoctrinated them, if you will, with the vision for how that neighborhood can get better, then we have failed them. We have failed the neighborhood. And the organization will not have been successful. And it seems to me that has to be fundamental to any faith- based initiative is that we have to build the capacity amongst the people in the neighborhood to know how to do all this stuff. And it is incumbent on those that are leaders in those organizations and in those neighborhoods to do that or we ought to be tossed out on our ears because we are not doing our job. Mr. Souder. Anything else you want to say? Rev. de Leon. I just want to thank you for coming to Los Angeles. Mr. Souder. Thank you. Mr. Souder. And giving us this opportunity. It is just a joy to be here, there are just people like yourself that are supportive of our work on a local level. Mr. Souder. Well, thank you very much for your efforts. And thank you for coming. We will take a brief recess to take a break. And then we will have the second panel start. [Recess.] Mr. Souder. If each of the witnesses could stand. Need to give you the oath. Were all of you here earlier when I explained this? This is an oversight committee of Congress. It is standard practice of this committee that we swear in all the witnesses. So if you will raise your right hands. [Witnesses sworn.] Mr. Souder. Thank you. Let the record show that the witnesses responded in the affirmative. Thank you all for coming. Those of you who have been here kind of got a general drift of some of what we are trying to do here. We have 5 minutes basically for testimony, being a little generous with the definition of the 5 minutes. But that way we have time to interact on some of the major questions. Your written testimony will appear in the record, so if you want to veer from that or comment on the first panel, however you want to go you can kind of see what kind of information we are putting together here. Our first witness is Dr. Keith Phillips, president of World Impact. We thank you for hosting us here today and for this wonderful opportunity to be here. STATEMENTS OF KEITH PHILLIPS, PRESIDENT, WORLD IMPACT; DOUG GOLD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, JEWISH BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS; JOHN BAKER, CELEBRATE RECOVERY; STEVE ALLEN, SALVATION ARMY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; AND TIM HOOTEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MINISTRY AND SERVICE, AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY Mr. Phillips. Thank you. Chairman Souder, we are very happy that you are here and thank you for allowing me to appear before you today. I am president of World Impact, a non-profit, faith-based organization designed to help transform the lives of the urban poor. Our ministry began right here in Watts in 1965 and now extends to San Diego, Fresno, San Francisco, Oakland, Wichita, St. Louis, Dallas, Newark, Philadelphia and, of course, other communities in Los Angeles. We have camps and conference centers in California, Colorado, Kansas and Pennsylvania. We offer housing for the homeless, job training for the unemployed, education and GED training to dropouts, health care to the sick, uninsured and impoverished, and food and clothing to the hungry, addicted and downtrodden. We provide assistance to single mothers, and youth clubs and camping experiences for at-risk and troubled kids and their families. Our success can be attributed to four critical elements in our work: One, time-tested techniques and successful programs; two, committed professional staff, who actually live in the inner-city communities where they serve, and thousands of committed volunteers; three, our partnerships, which are strong with churches, universities, hospitals, social service agencies and organizations; and four, the spiritual component of our work, which is the very foundation of our dedication and commitment to helping others. It guides our mission and transforms lives. World Impact prides itself on being financially responsible, efficient and honest. We have low administrative costs and a high volume of volunteerism. We significantly reduce the burden placed on State and local governments and public agencies by servicing a high volume of individuals and helping them become self sufficient, educated and taxpayers, instead of tax recipients. I want to give you three examples of our financial effectiveness: In Wichita, KS, we operate the Good Samaritan Clinic which serves the uninsured, impoverished patients seeking primary care. At the two major hospitals in Wichita an emergency visit costs $600, plus $150 for the physician. There is an additional charge if a patient has called an ambulance, and the hospital has to pay to return the patient home. Headache, or other body pain, is the No. 1 reason hospitals give for patients visiting the emergency room. The primary medicine dispensed is Tylenol. This means that Tylenol and getting your blood pressure checked costs more than $750, plus up to 6 hours of waiting time. At World Impact's Good Samaritan Clinic we charge an average of $26 per visit. Our actual cost is $45. This fiscal year, we billed $53,000 to patients without health insurance or any other kind of assistance. So far, we have received $5,000. We operate on a sliding-fee scale. Bottom line: $750 versus $26 per patient. The faith-based ministry has an obvious efficiency. Our second illustration is the school that you are in here today. We are sitting within a mile of the three worst schools academically in the State of California. The Watts Christian School performs 50 percent better than the local elementary school in math, three times the performance in the language arts. The Watts Christian School has half the classroom size and costs 75 percent of what the State pays per pupil. In other words, our classroom sizes are less than 15. The cost per student is $4,000. The State pays $6,450 on average per pupil. In San Diego, our vocational-training business assembles sprinkler parts. We provide reliable employment for 30 plus employees. Nearly 200 people have gone through our program, including the formerly incarcerated and/or addicted, single mothers and senior citizens with limited incomes, who do not qualify yet for Social Security. Approximately, 75 percent of our employees have been teens who otherwise would have joined gangs, turned to drugs or had a difficult time finding employment for many reasons. Our program teaches entry-level skills. We have a great success rate. Close to 90 percent of our employees find better jobs, finish high school, go on to college or enter the Armed Forces. Jose Moran worked for us for 8 months in 1995. He came as a teen with little job experience, bored and looking for direction. We helped him secure employment with Hamann Construction, where he started as an apprentice carpenter. Today he is one of their supervisors. He is married and has two children and recently bought a home for his family. Maria Saucedo began working for us in 1992. She dropped out of school in the 7th grade, had her first child at 15. Today, she oversees our work and earns $12 an hour. Five of the eight Lira children, who grew up in a two- bedroom apartment right next to our ministry, worked for us as teens. Two of them went on to Christian colleges to get degrees in education, one is a plumber, one works in shipping and receiving at a golf supply manufacturing company, one became married, has children and stays at home caring for them. Time prohibits me from sharing with you the great success we have had with our Jobs Alliance Program in St. Louis, family vacations for the urban poor nationally, conferences for survivors of senseless street-gang violence, vocational training for the Hmong and Ming in Fresno, community breakfasts for the homeless in Newark and Oakland. Our staff and volunteers are amazing people, modern-day heroes. I invite you to tour all of our facilities and programs throughout the country to get a better sense of what we are doing and how the programs work. While we have experienced great success, one element is missing. Imagine what could be accomplished for the urban poor if organizations like World Impact could partner with the Federal, State and local governments to solve some of these deeply rooted problems that confront us. But is it possible to partner with the government without fearing that we will lose our core values, our mission or our spiritual focus? Probably you are in a better position to answer that question than I am. From my perspective, the government can help us, and I jotted down just a few thoughts: You could forgive student loans for teachers, doctors, nurses and other staff who serve in the inner-city. You could provide school vouchers for institutions like this. You could provide incentives for professional volunteers: doctors, nurses, dentists, teachers, plumbers, electricians for their time that they donate. You could provide tax incentives for businesses which provide volunteer days for their employees, or to secunda professionals to a non-profit for an extended period of time. You could encourage Federal employees to volunteer. Members of Congress should set the example. You could provide lists of Federal volunteer labor sources, for example Armed Services personnel, prisoners, and how to contact them to get them involved. You could provide subsidy for job training either to establish a new faith-based job-skills training, or to help with the cost of third-party educators. Open the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to faith-based works. You could provide new and used vehicles, and other equipment, materials and supplies. Instead of disposing of seized property--cars, trucks, land, etc.--at government auctions, give it to us. Give us facilities where we can run clinics, thrift stores, recreational activities and vocational training. Help us provide better transportation for the urban poor to camps, conferences and schools by giving us the use of government vehicles like buses on weekends. Provide mal- practice insurance for clinics. We would open clinics in every community where we minister if we could afford the insurance. In Kansas, the volunteers are covered under the Charitable Health Care Providers provision in the statutes. Without this legislative coverage, we could not involve volunteer professionals like we do. You can provide books/resources for schools and camps among the poor, surplus food. You could allow non-itemizers to deduct charitable contributions. The government could subcontract work to us, which we would use for vocational training. Maintain and expand the enhanced deduction; that's the cost of the inventory plus half of its appreciated value when a company donates inventory for ``the care of infants, the ill, or needy.'' And then you could invite the Watts Christian School Choir to sing at the House of Representatives. Chairman Souder, thank you for indulging me and for inviting me to appear before you. I would be pleased, of course, to answer any questions you might have. [The prepared statement of Dr. Phillips follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.019 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.020 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.021 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.022 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.023 Mr. Souder. Thanks for a great list. Next is Doug Gold, the executive director of the Jewish Big Brothers & Big Sisters in L.A. Mr. Gold. Mr. Gold. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I was not exactly sure what to expect today showing up, but I think my comments are still relevant here. Tikkun Olam. It is a phrase familiar to the Jewish people, but perhaps not to all of you. Now why would I share this with you? Because I think it speaks to the values and work that the Jewish community does. It is the essence of who we are. It is at the heart of everything we do as Jews. What does Tikkun Olam mean? Now keeping in mind that I'm not a Rabbi or biblical scholar, there are actually multiple interpretations which have been debated for centuries. And it might seem odd that two short words could vary so widely in interpretation, but that's an entirely different subject, and I think there is actually a joke in there somewhere about a couple Jewish lawyers, but we won't go there today. Loosely speaking, Tikkun Olam means ``repairing the world'' or ``healing the world.'' You will notice that nowhere does it make reference to race, color, creed or religion. That is the essence of what the Jewish community bases its values on. A non-discriminating approach to helping mankind. And that is exactly what we are in the business of doing every day at Jewish Big Brothers Big Sisters of Los Angeles; repairing or healing the world one child at a time, to the tune of 1,500 children every year. We have been in business for 88 years, serving our community irrespective of race, color, creed or religion. Certainly our program has its roots in serving the underprivileged children of the Jewish community in 1915. We were trying to save young Jewish men, who had no male role model in their lives, from taking on a life of crime. We plucked young men right out of the juvenile court system and began counseling them and showing them alternatives to the destructive lives they were leading by matching them up with Big Brothers. Business professionals showed a keen interest in supporting this cause and formalized our program over the next several years. By 1936, we were seeing the needs of our community change slightly. The Depression had brought about severe economic challenges that left many of the kids in our community starving, not just for affection, but for food. Camp Max Straus began as a way of taking some of the most impoverished Jewish kids from Boyle Heights, a local community here, and shipping them off to camp for a couple weeks to fatten them up. Many of those kids ended up becoming a part of our Little Brother program. Now if you flash forward to post-World War II, you see the demographics of Los Angeles community changing again. As many of the earlier settlers of the Jewish community began picking themselves up from economic despair and beginning to thrive, we saw a new community of need developing with the Hispanic and African-American influx in that same neighborhood of Boyle Heights. As our community changed, so did our agency. While our Big Brother/Little Brother program retained its roots as a Jewish-only program, our Camp Max Straus operation flourished as we diversified. Today, we run numerous non-denominational programs; our historic residential camp, a wilderness backpacking program, a sports mentoring program, college scholarships, and most recently, yesterday in fact, the launching of a new arts mentoring program. In addition to our programmatic success, we have undertaken a significant organizational restructuring that began several years ago prior to my arrival. Non-profits have been under pressure and under attack, as any other industry, for greater accountability and transparency. Our Board of Trustees numbering 70 recognized the importance of taking on the 21st century with a new approach. They decided that the organization needed to be run like any other business; with focus on the bottom-line while still maintaining compassion through service delivery. They left no rock unturned as they completely reorganized the operation, including plucking me out of an 11- year software industry career to come run the agency. Now why am I sharing this piece of information with you? I thought it was important before closing, that you see Jewish Big Brothers Big Sisters of Los Angeles is on the cutting edge of the changes occurring in the nonprofit industry. And I think it is important because it translates to survival and relevancy to the community that we serve. In closing, I wanted to share that out of the 1500 children we serve every year, 80 percent are non-Jews. Now why is that an important statistic? Perhaps it is not. Perhaps it is only a byproduct of who needs the most help in our community. But that's not what I want you to walk away with today. The message I want you to walk away with, is the same message I urge my Board of Trustees to focus on, and that is the importance of our role in the Los Angeles community. Our role is to foster Jewish core values. Our role is to provide a destination for Jews interested in serving the community and volunteering their time or money, irrespective of the constituency being served. Our role is provide the infrastructure necessary for passing on to future generations of Jews what Tikkun Olam means. Thank you. [The prepared statement of Mr. Gold follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.024 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.025 Mr. Souder. Thank you very much. The third witness is Pastor John Baker, Celebrate Recovery of Lake Forest. Pastor Baker. Chairman Souder, I want to thank you for allowing me the opportunity to testify today. And I would like to give you a brief history of Celebrate Recovery program and its effectiveness in the community. It is part of Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, CA. Celebrate Recovery started on November 21,1991, it has been going ever since. I should have reintroduced myself. I would like to have the opportunity to do that to you as a believer who struggles with alcoholism. I have not always been a pastor. I was a successful businessman and also a functional alcoholic. To make a long story short, I abused alcohol for almost 19 years, I hit my bottom and almost lost my family. My family was attending Saddleback Church and asked me to go with them. It was there that I was reunited with my Higher Power of my youth. He has a name, Jesus Christ. God led me to start a Biblically based recovery program at Saddleback called Celebrate Recovery. At that time, our church had about 5,000 members. Today we have an attendance of over 15,000 on a weekend. In the last 12 years over 6,000 courageous individuals have gone through the Celebrate Recovery program at Saddleback. Celebrate Recovery is the No. 1 outreach program at Saddleback Church. Over 70 percent of the 800 to 900 individuals that attend Celebrate Recovery each week come from outside the church family. They come from the community. But God had much bigger plans than that. Rick Warren, Saddleback's senior pastor, and I wrote the Celebrate Recovery curriculum. It has been published and is now being used by over 2,500 churches of all different denominations in the United States and internationally. The Spanish translation was just released last year. What was really exciting is to see how the program has been successful in helping those in halfway houses, rescue missions, jails, and prisons. Just a couple of specific examples. In halfway houses over the last 5 years recovery homes have been bringing their residents to Celebrate Recovery at Saddleback church. Attendance is voluntary for each individual. We have had individuals that have lived in the recovery homes, completed their program, returned home, find a local church, and help start Celebrate Recovery programs in their community. Rescue missions. In December 2000, the Orange County Rescue Mission asked if we could supply them leaders and help start Celebrate Recovery program for their women's and men's facilities at the mission. After 2 years of multiple step studies, 82 of the residents have completed the Celebrate Recovery program. The rescue mission chaplains went through the Celebrate Recovery leadership training. Today we have transitioned the running of the mission's Celebrate Recovery program completely over to the mission staff. The following remarks are from Tommy, who completed the Celebrate Recovery step study at the mission this last April. ``I was homeless and a drunk. I tried a few AA programs but nothing could fill the empty spot in my soul. My year spent in Vietnam would keep coming back, so to put it out of my mind, I would drink. I got into a knife fight in a park and decided that I could no longer go on living that way. I came to the Mission. Celebrate Recovery gave me a chance to get right with God, work through the step study, and resolved my issues of the past. I am serving as a step study leader giving back to the Celebrate Recovery program that gave me so much to me.'' Tommy has completed welding school and is now working in his field. And finally, in jails and prisons. In 1999, the State of New Mexico began testing the Celebrate Recovery program as an addition to their therapeutic treatment programs. It started at the Southern Correctional facility at Los Cruz, New Mexico. The inmates volunteered to be in the program through the prison chaplain. They were placed in separate faith-based recovery pods for 12 to 18 months. The program has now expanded to five additional New Mexico State prisons. In the last 3 years, over 1,000 inmates have participated in the New Mexico Celebrate Recovery program. The recidivism rate in New Mexico is 78 percent. To date, 167 inmates who have completed the Celebrate Recovery program have been released for over 1 year. Only 13 have returned into the system, which is an unofficial recidivism rate of 7.8 percent. This is what the program has meant to Leticia, 1 of those 167, ``During my incarceration, I began attending Celebrate Recovery. The program opened my heart and mind that got me on my way to the `real' recovery and gave me hope. I found the courage to `accept the things I cannot change,' but to use the time in prison to change the things I can. Upon my release, I continued applying the principles to life and of course continued reading the Scriptures. They have both helped me to maintain a drug free life, which in turn helped me obtain employment and become a productive member of society once again.'' It is my opinion that Celebrate Recovery should be made available in all correctional facilities; not only for the residents, but for the staff also. We all have issues, whether we are behind bars or imprisoned in our minds and hearts. Celebrate Recovery is just starting in the California State Prison system. At the Jamestown facility, 135 men have volunteered to be in one of the 11 Celebrate Recovery groups. This is just a drop in the bucket of the California State system. Currently there are 165,000 inmates in the system. A unique advantage to the Celebrate Recovery program for prisoners is that while the inmate is getting recovery inside; their family can get recovery and support from a church in their area that has the Celebrate Recovery program. Also, when the inmate is released they can get immediate connection and support from a local Celebrate Recovery church. Again, these are just a few of the specific examples that are being duplicated in communities all over the United States. In closing, I believe that recovery from our life's hurts, hang-ups, and habits is a family matter. Our addictions and compulsions affect not only our families, but all those around us as well. At Celebrate Recovery we provide groups not only for recovery from drugs and alcohol but from sexual abuse, sexual addiction, anger, adult children of the chemically addicted, financial recovery, codependency and eating addictions. We also currently have curriculum for elementary, junior high and high school ages. If you would like to find out more information on Celebrate Recovery go to our Web site: www.celebraterecovery.com. Thank you for letting me share. [The prepared statement of Pastor Baker follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.026 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.027 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.028 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.029 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.030 Mr. Souder. Thank you. Next to Mr. Allen, Steve Allen who is director of Social Services for the Salvation Army in Los Angeles. Mr. Allen. Thank you, Chairman Souder. It is good to be here, and I have enjoyed listening to some of the discussion. Very interesting. I am going to start by just reading the Salvation Army mission statement, if that is OK. The Salvation Army, an international movement, is an evangelical part of the universal Christian church. Its message is based on the Bible. Its ministry is motivated by the love of God. Its mission is to preach the gospel of Jesus Christ and to meet human needs in his name without discrimination. The Salvation Army is a very old organization, going all the way back to 1865. It started in England and came to the United States, this part of the world, in 1885. And I submitted to you a list of 16 of the programs that are operating in the Los Angeles area, 16 out of the 25 that we have here. And in a short amount of time I am hoping to just maybe touch on two or three of the programs and give you some of the highlights. Any given night we have something in the region of 2,500 men, women and children sleeping in our facilities. And I would just like to draw attention to the Harbor Light program, which is on Skid Row. It's a 280 bed facility. And reading the question about how faith-based organizations serve the people, comparing it to my time of 10 years as a probation officer back in England working for the government and then looking at the staff we have here, it is interesting making the comparisons. One of the things I have noticed working here in the 9 years that I have held this position is the passion and the drive from some of the staff there, many of whom come through the program. It is interesting to see the success rates. We have something in the region of 67 percent who successfully graduate from the program. That is after the 14 day primary phase. And it is really important to be clear on that, because statistics can be given a lot of ways. After that 14 day primary period, 67 percent successfully graduate from the program. And I want to share a story of a man called Conrad Watson, who in 1982 came through the program. Lasted 2 weeks and flunked out. A year later he decided to come back again in 1983 and the same thing happened. He lasted about a month. And he was one that would be classed as a failure rate, but he is quick to share with us that on the third time that he came through in 1984 he successfully completed the program. He found employment with the Salvation Army. He gradually made his way through the ranks. And I am very happy to report today that after 20 years, he is now the executive director responsible for the 68 staff that operate in that center. And he is a real great testimony. And I was on the phone to him this morning and I want to share his story. And he said absolutely. He thanks God every day for his blessings and what has happened in his life. He is one of many who have come through the programs, and probably about 65 percent of the staff that is incorporated in that program came through. And it is wonderful that they can share their experiences and pass that on. And I want to draw your attention to Bell Shelter, which is No. 2 on the list that I submitted. That's a 350 bed facility for men and women. Bell Shelter is 75,000 feet in the city of Bell. It offers a comprehensive program which includes emergency shelter, skills acquisition, transitional housing and substance abuse recovery for 350 homeless men and women. Bell Shelter also offers medical assistance, counseling and weekly chapel services aimed at providing a recovery experience that ministers to the whole person, mind, body and soul. It is interesting that we have had a new mental health program that provides onsite assessment and treatment for homeless men and women who are mentally ill or dual diagnosed with mental illnesses and substance abuse. When talking again about the faith-based initiative, here we are with government money in a very large program, actually based on Federal property, and yet if I took you down on a Thursday night, I could take you to the service with 180 men and women. Very, very exciting, accelerating service, but it is voluntary. And I think that is where we see the success. It is very important that we give that option, and as long as it is voluntary, as long as there are other options to be able to participate in, we find that it is a very good way of reaching out to people. And as long as you make it vibrant and exciting and it connects, then we have found a lot of success in that area. And we have a youth center, the Red Shield Youth Center in Pico-Union that has 4,000 members. We do a lot of intervention with gangs there. It's an oasis for the young people living out there. The primary focus at Red Shield is to encourage kids to stay in school and build skills for the future. Children participate in soccer, tutoring, basketball, baseball, karate, ballet, swimming, scouting, computer learning and arts programs. And all-day On Track program is also offered for students on break from year round school. Again, we offer a voluntary Sunday school where we have about 400 who attend. We have a Bible study in Spanish for the parents, about 80 of them would like to attend. And this is another example of the way you can marry them up and there is never a problem with the programmatic part and also staying true to the gospel message that we want to deliver. Finally, I draw your attention to Alegria, which is a residential care facility for homeless families with HIV/AIDS. The program provides housing and comprehensive services for up to 44 families, including a licensed child care facility for 70 children and 29 family apartment units, making it one of the largest of its kind. This is a very interesting program. Its recently expanded. It is in Silver Lake, Hollywood. And, you know, a wonderful example of what can be done in a much needed area as the AIDS community. I have still got a tiny bit of time so I will go on to one more program. Booth Memorial Center is over 100 years old. Its served pregnant and parenting young women. Now it is a 103 years, to be exact. Its name is in honor of the Salvation Army's founder, William Booth. And the center serves as a licensed group home facility for 56 teenagers. It is now expanded. For babies as well as other trouble adolescent girls. And it is also located on site and is a licensed childcare center for more than 75 children. And what has really been helpful has been the high school which we brought on board about 5 years ago. Because you can imagine some of the problems we had when we are getting 56 girls ready for school in the morning, 15 different minibuses and someone would get suspended up to 2 weeks. So the problems that they experienced, being level 12 in a group home, were very challenging. And now that we have our own onsite school, we have seen huge success. And we had seven graduates last year. This is through the L.A. Unified School District. And a greater understanding between the residential staff and the school staff, and with the similar complexities that we have dealing with these girls. So that has been very successful. I am confused. It says stop, but it has 2 minutes and 10 remaining. Is that still time to talk? Mr. Souder. No. If you want to add something you can. I think that is the amount you went over the 5. Mr. Allen. Just one quick thing. I am just going to talk about the two camps that we have in Malibu, Camp Gilmore and Camp Mt. Crags. This is kind of interesting because we have 2,500 children every summer that would use that. Like many other camps, it is very successful with the kids. But we tried one very interesting experiment and we took 150 men and women who are in substance abuse recovery to that camp for a 5-day program, which we have never tried before. We did this 6 years ago, and we have been doing since because the 5-day camp was so successful. I mean, these men and women, some of them have never seen the countryside, they have never seen the hills, the Malibu mountains. And we had like a recreational camp with an AA component to it, men and women's track and a strong gospel theme running through it. And I feel that was really instrumental when we analyzed the statistical data of that 150 men and women who came out who were all in recovery, the success rate from the 67 percent on completing the programs, went up to 81 percent. I thought maybe that was a fluke the first year. But every year we have monitored that and it is a very similar type of statistic. Interesting to see that kind of emphasis on a 5-day camp would have such an impact on so many men and women. I will stop right there. [The prepared statement of Mr. Allen follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.031 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.032 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.033 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.034 Mr. Souder. All right. Thank you very much. Our last witness, our cleanup batter for the two panels is Tim Hooten, executive director, Office of Ministry and Service at Azusa Pacific University in Azusa, CA. Mr. Hooten. Thank you, Chairman Souder. Let me tell you a little bit about who we are. Azusa Pacific University is a private Christian liberal arts university. Now we have grown very quickly in the past 10 years. We have roughly 9,000 students and that includes our satellite campuses here in southern California. But our undergrad is roughly around 3,500. And I represent the Office of Ministry and Service. And at APU we have a requirement, like it sounds like you had out at Notre Dame, that all of our students get involved in the community. And so that means I have a student staff of 20 and a volunteer force of 3,500 to work throughout the San Gabriel Valley. The burden we carry, or the joy, is to connect those students to ministry opportunities or outreach opportunities throughout the San Gabriel Valley and especially in our neighborhood there in the city of Azusa that is 60 percent Latino and there is a majority of people who live at or below the poverty level. It is very different than its neighboring community Glendora. Just when you cross the street, and we are right at that border. And so in the last 10 years we have established many initiatives to become more acquainted with the city of Azusa than the city of Glendora. And our students tend to represent the demographic of Glendora rather than the city of Azusa, too. So in some ways we are a fish out of water and because what we believe about what the New Testament says and what it means to be a Christian, and we feel that there are many Christian groups out there, churches and otherwise who have not quite understood the message of Christ, that what the church is is a group of people who are community oriented. Not about itself. If its about itself, then it is not about the community. And so we try to teach our students that, and we do that in practice by getting them out there. You know, we do not have the traditional student quite as much as we used to. We used to alway says four semesters, or 4 years and now that becomes 5 or 6 years because of the cost of education. But every semester, basically, that they are in school they are out in the community doing ministry. And we also encourage them to get involved whatever their academic choices are, the major that they choose, really they have a minor of community justice and social activism, because it is required. There are only three things that are required at APU. And those are going to class, which you've got to do to get a college degree. Going to chapel and then also to do community service. So in my office, we think of ourselves as a catalyst, a conduit, a motivator and mobilizer. I have a staff of 18 students who oversee community development, but then they also mobilize students to other agencies that we just support. And the local ones that we are involved with. There's a counseling center started by the university, a health clinic, and the Foothill AIDS project is an agency that we send students to. Also something that we started called Day of Champions. Because we have so many young people in the city of Azusa who love soccer but they cannot afford an expensive 1 week long soccer clinic, we bring in a semi-professional soccer team and do a free one for them on a Saturday. And then the following Saturdays after that we followup with them with our mens and womens soccer team. And we also try to connect those types of ministries to local churches. Way is Walking with Azusa's Youth. It is sort of a big brother/big sister but it is academic mentoring. And so we teach them how to use computers. It's relational as well as academic support. And that was started by an APU student last year who works in my office. Cerritos Kids is a big win for us. We purchased a property. We did not want to displace the people who lived in those apartments, we being the university. We did not want to displace the people living there. And so we have increased their standard of living there, but we took a social work class over there to do a needs assessment to find out how can we support them outside of just giving them a place to live, that we are actually not giving them, they are paying rent for. But they said we need an after school program for our kids. So they are in the middle of this big apartment complex. We have between 50 and 150 children who are getting academic support after school, and that is all done, I joke about this, but we have mandatory volunteers. And so on a voluntary basis, once the students get involved, their hearts really get into it and I see that with the feedback sheets that we get from those students from semester to semester. Peach Factory is a 30 year old after school program. It is very similar to the one I just described. We also have Gateway for teen moms. And these are mentoring programs. And then City Links is something I am really excited about that we started only a few years ago. And I think somebody else described in the last panel something very similar to it, where we get all of the social agencies locally together and we have a big celebration of the ongoing service that is happening. And the morning we spend out at the community at 20 to 30 different sites where we are doing work projects. And then we come back together to celebrate it with free food and give aways and music, etc. We have urban outreach down here in L.A. How am I doing on my time? I am over already. This weekend I spent down here in Los Angeles with my student staff in some teen development and training, but also to work there at Union Rescue Ministries at the mission there. And it reminded me, my students are so excited about what they are doing and they understand that at the university we are training them for their future, but we want to put them on a trajectory no matter what their professional choices are, that their vocation is going to be service. No matter what they do, whether they are teachers or lawyers or doctors or in public policy, that no matter what, it is service and that should grow out of their love for Christ and their faith. Because not all students at APU are Christians. I also was reminded of a few years ago, our urban program is Hope for the Homeless and it's one that another agency runs but we send a bunch of students, like 50 to 150 students every weekend down to Hope for the Homeless where they pass out food and clothing, etc. and have relationships with the homeless people. And it was right before Thanksgiving and this gal put a sign on the door. It was the student mobilizer for this. Because she was going out of town and she wanted to let all of her volunteers know that it was not happening. And so without thinking, she put a sign on the door that said ``There will be no hope for the homeless this Thanksgiving'' and signed her name. And I saw that, and I just laughed so hard when I saw that. You think about what the meaning of the sign that you put on the door. But what that reminds me of, though, is that without agencies, without a university like APU and others like it and these agencies represented today, I believe there is no hope for the homeless. And I believe there is no hope for the fatherless and the voiceless and the powerless. And I feel that because we are there, because we are present, because we are doing what we are doing and we do it at a foundational level that there is hope for the homeless and there are surrogate fathers for the fatherless and there are children who are getting excited about the possibility of even going to college where in their families the idea would never be supported. And so it is a privilege to share that little bit. And I wish I had a written statement, but I just got the call. So I am glad that I could even be here. Mr. Souder. Yes, thank you very much. I want to thank each of your for your testimony. Now I want to go through some questions and followup. I have a question for Pastor Baker. Your basic thrust is alcoholism but you deal with drug addiction, and also other drug addictions such as marijuana, cocaine, heroin? Pastor Baker. Yes. Yes. All of them. Every one of them. Mr. Souder. Are your programs different for the different drugs? Pastor Baker. No. We found that, like in the secular recovery models of AA and NA, they separate them out. We call our groups chemical dependencies. It is all really basically that you are addicted to a chemical and so we put them together. Because a lot of our guys and ladies have been multiple. They are in different stages of some use drugs and alcohol, and some just use one or the other. So we have combined them and it seems to have worked well over the years. Mr. Souder. Have you talked to Director Walters? Do you know what ONDCP is, Office of National Drug Control Policy and Director John Walters, who is commonly called the drug czar. Pastor Baker. OK. Mr. Souder. Barry McCaffery was and Bill Bennett. You have never been in touch with their office? Pastor Baker. No, sir. Mr. Souder. One of our other main projects for this 2 year cycle in addition to the faith-based efforts is drug treatment. Pastor Baker. Right. Mr. Souder. Our committee, as you may have heard me mention, is the primary narcotics committee, which means I have been to Colombia 10 times in the last 7 years. And we spend a lot of time down in Central and South America with those countries, which leads us into immigration questions, trade questions and those things as well as narcotics questions. But we spend a lot of time with intradiction, but we are trying to focus more on treatment and how clearly to the degree we can get drugs eradicated before they start and catch them before they come here and then at the border, and then by the big dealers before they get down to the street user, that's preferable. But at the same time there is a percentage that if we could get them off the addiction, we would address the drug problem, too. Pastor Baker. Right. Mr. Souder. I am not a believer that is the only way. I think there is a lot of mythology that is the primary way, because for every new addict a certain percent of those will be long term addicts. But those long term addicts in addition to helping them as individuals, are a very high risk to society if you look at from the taxpayer's side in addition to the individual. The President has a proposal which will be hotly debated this year as one of the legislative branches of the faith-based argument to allow groups that are faith-based to be eligible, and this is what has prompted the kind of renewal of the argument this year. It is in my opinion absolutely legally clear that unless there are choices in a community, that is not going to be allowed. In other words, if you are in a small town and you have a mix of Muslim, Buddhists, Christian and there is only one Muslim group there or one Christian group, you cannot force everybody else to do it. But in most places in drug treatment that are multiple options. And the question is can faith-based organizations be included in drug treatment. With such a large effort, I would definitely like to do a followup. Nick Coleman is one person you will get a call from on our staff, but we need to get you matched up with ONDCP. Our committee has both authorizing and oversight. We are redoing their legislation now. The Senate has passed a bill or is coming up with a bill slightly different than ours, mostly on border control issues. Pastor Baker. That is exciting. Mr. Souder. But we need to get you matched up with your program. The second thing is Congressman Frank Wolf from Virginia. If you have any video of your programs in the New Mexico prison. I don't know how far along, how far along is the California prison? Pastor Baker. It actually just began. Mr. Souder. But particularly in New Mexico? Pastor Baker. Right. Mr. Souder. Chairman Wolf heads the appropriations on the Justice Committee. He is very interested in innovative programs and we have worked with Chuck Colson for years in Prison Fellowship. At our San Antonio hearing we had the people in from Sugarland in Texas and worked with some of their prison initiatives. And they were at one of our earlier hearings like this in Nashville. I do not remember the name of the group that is in all those prisons around the country. They are in 28 States. Theirs is not as direct of a faith-based, but they have character programs, literacy programs. And both he and I are particularly interested on the majority side in what we are doing in the prison population, purely voluntary, but we have seen just dramatic changes in recidivism. Also a Democratic member of this committee, Danny Davis, I'm the Republican lead on a housing bill for prisoners. But with those two programs we are going to have some followup with in particular, but I wanted to because of the scale of your program and some of your recidivism rates questions, and it is a little bit different than what we have seen. The Salvation Army has a tremendous range of programs here in Los Angeles. Is this one of the largest, obviously, Los Angeles is one of the two largest cities. Chicago is a big one. Mr. Allen. Yes. Los Angeles, New York and Chicago. Mr. Souder. Is this a similar diversity of the programs that you would have in the---- Mr. Allen. Absolutely. Yes. Yes. I mean, I have given you 16 here outlined. There are far more. I just wanted to be fairly concise in this. Probably about 25, 26 just in L.A. County alone. Very diverse. All the way from child care going up to senior housing. Mr. Souder. If you could as a supplement give us, any of you, your different programs to kind of see what we are talking through supplement with that. And give us a little perspective. I think what would be helpful, you never know how these hearing records are going to be viewed over the years. Because this will be published in about 6 months in a hearing booklet form. What I know, having worked with this issue from the start from the early 1980's when I worked for then Congressman Daniel Coats with the Children Family Committee through the Senate as a staffer and now as a House member, that there are only about two or three substantive hearings in 15 years, other than the legal debate. And so this bank of hearings people are going to go through. And we have had a pretty good debate at every single hearing. And, Mr. Gold, I hope you didn't feel at all intimidated. This is probably the most overtly evangelical total panels of the two we have had. We usually have a mix, but we have had the Catholic, Jewish, Lutheran; pretty much the diversity at the different groups. Although clearly the thrust of this is toward more flexibility in faith-based organizations in these hearings. We want to make sure we air the debate. Our committee is very diverse on both sides. And in our final report we will probably have the things we agree on, and that is the importance of serving everybody, the importance of reaching to the poor. Probably we have been able to work out the tax credit or deduction part. The training part, where we will probably have the majority and minority views, is whether any direct government funds should go in. And then the whole range of questions that I am going to get into in a minute. Let me ask Mr. Gold, one of the things that has been very interesting for me to hear articulated in different ways are different religious traditions and how they approach in their motivation for getting involved. And certainly the Jewish tradition has had probably the longest of social support in the community, not only their own but beyond that. At the end it was real interesting because in your definition of your agency, you are clearly serving mostly non- Jews but you defined it as a role to provide a definition for Jews interested in serving the community. Are non-Jews on your board or allowed to volunteer in your organization, too? Mr. Gold. No and yes. There are not currently any non-Jews on our board, but with the exception of our Big Brothers, who have to be Jewish to be a Jewish Big Brother, but for our other mentoring programs there is no limitation. We accept everyone and everything, however we certainly try to promote within the Jewish community, hey, if you are Jewish and you want to volunteer, this is a place where you can do it. But we do not limit. Mr. Souder. Would it change the nature of your organization if it became 50 percent protestant? Mr. Gold. I do not think so. Mr. Souder. It would not change the service to the individuals? Mr. Gold. No. Mr. Souder. But would Jews then view it as much of a place for a Jewish person to go to volunteer? Mr. Gold. That's a very interesting question. Mr. Souder. You have entered into a zone, and what it got me to thinking about, because you had a very unusual wording that would be different than kind of a fundamental type approach that I would have. Mr. Gold. Right. Mr. Souder. Or it would not be an orthodox Jewish approach? It is also does not appear to be a liberal Jewish approach to it. Because it was an identification of a community. When we have asked this question in the African-American community, for example, one of the fundamental questions is to what degree do you mandate that you have to hire people of like mind or, as we got into an even more explosive question, indigenous population? Which is another way of saying if it is in a poor neighborhood, do most of your employees have to live in the poor neighborhood? Do they have to be poor? If you are an African-American community, what community has to be through affirmative action? Can it be African-American? And at what point if an organization does not reflect that group, will it cease to be the Jewish boys and girls or Big Brothers/Big Sisters and not be an identified place for that group to go volunteer, even if there is philosophical opposition? Mr. Gold. Yes. Mr. Souder. One way people get around it is, they would say like on the first panel there was a statement of mission. And to some degree, you would think for example if you were a hard core fundamentalist Christian you probably would not volunteer to be part of the Big Brothers/Big Sisters that has Jewish in its name. You would not necessarily feel comfortable. On the other hand, that is kind of a cop out type question because the real fundamental question is how much is the Jewish identity part of it and is it a historical faith-based organization? In other words, we were founded by Jews. Mr. Gold. Sure. Mr. Souder. Or is it something that is really because of the Jewish identity and part of their faith is an outreach out of their faith, and that is a critical component of which at least a majority, if not everybody, has to share or it no longer is a Jewish boys and girls organization. Mr. Gold. Yes. Mr. Souder. It is just boys and girls. Mr. Gold. That is a great question. This is obviously a very difficult issue that has been debated within the Jewish community and the community at large. Mr. Souder. Almost as much in Israel as who is a Jew? Mr. Gold. Exactly. I mean, you are asking me to define how Jewish you are, and the latest demographic studies that have been done on how Jews are defined continues to evolve. And then if you get into a room with, you know, 12 Rabbis, you will get 24 opinions. And, unfortunately, I have a lot of Jewish attorneys on board. So I have even a bigger issue. But I think fundamentally our agency certainly started as very much a Jewish organization; Jewish people, Jewish constituents served. It has grown over time because our society has changed. If you ask some of the more significant Jewish communal leaders in this town, the non-religious, the non-rabbinic, right? They will tell you that we are probably about 10 percent of the L.A. population, the Jewish people. That has changed over the last two or three generations. We see a need for serving the greater community as of utmost importance. Because as we continue to become a smaller and smaller portion of the community at large, we feel as though it secures our place in history by helping the community grow. And as the definition of a Jew changes, we are in essence investing in ourselves. If a person, for instance, is raised in a household where the mother was a Christian and the father was a Jew, depending on who you ask, some people will tell you that person is Jewish, some people will tell you that they are not. So as our religion has evolved, and there has always been again a divisive issue of whether religion or culture or race in and of itself, we see the need to serve all. But I could go back to Biblical stories of Moses and things taking care of the community at large and not just Jews. That is why Moses was chosen as the leader, because he just did not take care of himself. He took care of the community at large. So I think there is a little bit of historical significance to who we are as a culture. There is also a current communal issue and demographic issue that is occurring within the Los Angeles community alone, I cannot speak to the larger movement, that I think is pressing. Does that erode who we are as our identity? Does it make us any less Jewish and does it blend us with Big Brothers/Big Sisters of Greater L.A? Because there are actually three of us here. There is Big Brothers/Big Sisters of Greater L.A., Catholic Big Brothers/Big Sisters and Jewish Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Catholic actually does not really have any religious affiliation. So would we blend over time? Maybe I am not a predictor. I am very new to the Jewish community here. I am very new to the non-profit world, as I said earlier. I spent my career in software. I have been at this 18 months and I am learning a lot as I go. But as I talk to many communal leaders, and most importantly to the people that are involved in our agency, I think the most important thing to us is doing good for our community. Again, Tikkun Olam has no boundary on it. It is just repairing the world, healing the world. So does that not mean then if you are doing that you are kind of Jewish? Mr. Souder. Well, you have touched on something that I want to followup a little with Dr. Phillips. Because you have touched on what is really a deeply philosophical and motivational question. Let me give you an illustration in drug treatment. Well, let me use another illustration first. One of the dilemmas we have when we approach this whole legal question about hiring and firing is because there is still so much bigotry and prejudice in the country that whenever you talk about hiring practices, you get people up like this. But there are often double standards in our society, with all due respect, and I know I am even in touchy ground even to raise this subject. But for example, Sorenstam going in the men's PGA tournament. Is it substantially different than if the men went over in the LPGA? And is it because there has been past discrimination against women that is seen as an advance, whereas if you had boys going into little girls soccer leagues or basketball leagues conceivably they would dominate? And as a whole in Congress the Jewish Members of Congress are much more skeptical about faith-based for fear it is going to come up with some type of discrimination that is oriented toward them. And Blacks are confused. On the one hand they have been historic discriminators on race, but they are supportive in many cases of Black churches becoming Black churches and not being overtaken by White boards. And so it is kind of a dilemma. For example, on adoption, do you think that Black kids are better off in families with Black parents if you have a choice, and should that be mandated by government? All of a sudden, yes, you see sides splitting a little bit differently. As discrimination goes down, presumably people will be less threatened and as there are more options by people who choose to associate in subgroups if in fact you are not condemning the other subgroups. But in your statement, you inadvertently, I think in a sense of entering into the debate, raised something. And that is are there things that motivate certain people to volunteer that if you took the uniqueness out, they would not volunteer? So, for example, to go to Dr. Phillips for a minute, your organization is presumably mostly privately funded. Do you get any Federal dollars? Mr. Phillips. Not now. Mr. Souder. Do you believe that the people who give to your organization predominately give because you are an unabashed, unapologetic Christian organization? Mr. Phillips. I would say that is right, although one of our largest donors to the Watts Christian School happens to be Jewish. Mr. Souder. It is not uniformly that way? Mr. Phillips. No, it is not uniformly that way. But we are very careful to share with people exactly who we are. And, obviously, it is very hard to hide that the Watts Christian School is Christian because of the name. And then if you walk into this room and you see ``Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, today and forever,'' perhaps you would have a hint. ``Jesus is Lord,'' ``Rejoice in the Lord.'' It is hard to hide who we are, and we do not make an attempt to do that. I will preach in a church and I will preach out of Isaiah, Jeremiah, Amos and talk about the need for God's people to care for the poor. I will point out that there are more Scripture dealing with how God's people relate to the poor and the oppressed than any other subject in Scripture. And so if you really believe the Bible, then you have to go back to Isaiah 58 where it talks about feeding the hungry, caring for the homeless. And if, in fact, you do those things, then God will shed His own glorious light upon you. Over and over Scripture says, ``if you care for the orphan, the widow, the stranger, the alien, the prisoner,'' then God will bless you. And, frankly, many churches desperately want to be involved in doing that and do not know how. And so we can provide a bridge. The Watts School has volunteers from all over southern California that come and not just give money, but give of them themselves, as all of our ministries across the country do. I was mentioning earlier the Good Samaritan Clinic where we have, I think, 25 or 30 doctors and dentists who on regular basis volunteer their time. And they do that because if they choose to, they can also share their faith with a patient who comes in who might say ``Why are you doing this?'' And they can, as it says in the New Testament, ``give a cup of cold water,'' but do it in the name of Christ. Mr. Souder. Let me ask you a question that actually, I do not know that I have ever heard it asked in Washington, but we get around the edges of it. Do you believe that what you were just saying there and your teachers, do you believe they are helping the poor because they are Christians or that they are helping the poor because they want to help the poor? Mr. Phillips. I think that the Christian does not have a Biblical alternative. And I cannot judge the motives of people, but I do know that the believer in Christ needs to have a relationship with the poor. You just cannot ignore that. It is what is commanded. Mr. Souder. Where this gets into it is some people say well can't you do the same thing without Christ? Mr. Phillips. I think people do. I think people do come and care for the poor and feed the hungry. Mr. Souder. In other words, I agree that people do. We can argue whether those are remnants of the Judeo-Christian teachings in the Old and New Testament or whether in fact secular humanism over time can sustain itself. Mr. Phillips. Yes. Mr. Souder. But what I would hypothesize, and I am trying to see whether you would agree and would it also be true of the college and others, is that if you drain out the motivation, would private Christian schools really be as effective if the teachers could not share their faith, if you did not have your symbols or is part of your effectiveness part of your faith? It is not to say that there are not some groups that are secularly effective, and we could argue why and what their histories are and so on. But the question is, is your ministry unique in part because people believe in Jesus Christ and believe that is a requirement? And if so, if that were taken out, what would happen to your ministry? Mr. Phillips. Yes, I believe the ministry is unique because we fear God and obey His commandments. And I think that if you take the salt and light, God-fearing people, out of a community, that it disintegrates. I think their very presence adds a preserving factor as salt does. I also think that without the moral values that you find in Scripture that talk about treating your neighbor as yourself, loving your neighbor as yourself, loving the Lord your God with all of your heart, mind and soul and your neighbor as yourself; without that, I think a community disintegrates. And so I think that to take the Christian aspect out of our ministry would destroy it. I think that the motivation for most people is probably not deeply thought out before they come. I think there is an emotional and then a willful determination that this is something that they ought to do. And because we fish among believers to get volunteers and to get missionaries and staff members who come and live here, I think that they realize that this is a very Biblical thing to do. You know, when Jesus announced that He was the Messiah, He quoted Isaiah 61 and He said He has come to preach the gospel to the poor, to heal the broken hearted, to set the captive free. And then a little later you find John the Baptist getting a little bit concerned about whether or not Jesus was the Messiah. John finds himself in prison about ready to lose his head, and he sends his disciples to Jesus and says, ``Are you really the Messiah,'' because I am about to die for this message. And Jesus tells John's disciples to go back and tell him that the poor have the gospel preached to them, the blind see, the lame walk, the deaf hear. That was all John needed to know, that Jesus was the Messiah because that was the messianic fulfillment of the Old Testament. And so someone comes and says ``Well, Representative Souder, are you a believer in Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior?'' You could respond, ``The poor have the gospel preached to them, the blind see, the lame walk, the deaf hear.'' And that is good enough. And so I think that it is so integral in the Judeo- Christian tradition that if you took that out, you would lose the effectiveness. Mr. Souder. So your basic argument is not that we have too much faith-based, but that we have too many faith organizations that do not practice their faith? Mr. Phillips. Absolutely. I think a lot of Christians and a lot of churches are not quite sure how to, you know, we live in a society that separates different segments of society and they do not know how to become involved. Mr. Souder. I wanted to followup on your specific list, which I really liked having a specific list. Let me see if I can find it here. On your list of 17, there are a couple of particulars. The school vouchers, an ongoing argument. The forgiving student loans for teachers, doctors and other staff working with the poor is an interesting wrinkle. We have tried to deal with this in underserved areas with tax incentives. Mr. Phillips. Well, let me address No. 1 because that is a very key thing. Azusa Pacific is a great university. How much does it cost for a student to go there each year? Mr. Hooten. Right now it is creeping up to $30,000. Mr. Phillips. OK. So you have a student that after 4 years of going to this great university, and I mean that sincerely, comes out with a debt of $40,000 to $60,000. So they want to come and work with a faith-based organization. Azusa has equipped them to do that. They have motivated them. They have thrown them out into the world. They invite me to come to chapel. People come and say I want to come, but the problem is I cannot afford it. They want to come and teach in the Watts Christian School. They want to work in a vocation, but they cannot afford it. That is the major, or a major, recruiting problem that we have today. At the Good Samaritan Clinic in Kansas, our first doctor had graduated, was it the University of Kansas or K State. Don, do you remember? KU. And they had some sort of a provision in Kansas that if you worked in a rural area, they would forgive debt. But when the State legislature saw what she was doing, they forgave all of her medical school debt, which enabled her to come and live on a missionary salary and serve the community. And actually, it was a great economic decision if you would refer to the former testimony. And so, anything that we can do to help people who are motivated but who are prevented from ministering to and living among the poor would be a great assistance to us because of the tremendous amount of debt they come out of schools with. And so I underscore that if you put some sort of a condition that if you lived and ministered among the poor for 5 years or something or a year for each school year, that your debt would be forgiven. That would greatly expand what we could do at this facility right here. You are sitting in a housing project. There are children all around. The limitation to the size of this school has to do with faculty who are willing to move into the community and teach here. Mr. Souder. Basically we have some bills in Congress and we need to see which ones are there, but in looking at the student loan, which is mostly focused on a merit goal, but there has been some look at the education question. I guess on the pay question, the differential would not be as great a question there. The tax incentives for volunteers and businesses which provide volunteer days, those are I think really strong proposals that if we do not have them, we will see that they get into the debate. Mr. Phillips. Let me tell you that No. 3 is not in the tax law. And let me explain to you what that could mean to an organization like us. If the roof goes out on this building, if a roofer donates the materials, he can write that off. If he comes and donates his labor, he cannot. And there are God- fearing good people who have a heart for the ministry that you are sitting in who would donate both materials and labor if they could afford it. Mr. Souder. Let me tell you one of the things that I have heard. The similar thing on malpractice, which on the surface looked so logical to try to deal with. My friend George Miller from California, without putting words in his mouth and not saying he would oppose this. And I say my friend, honestly he was Democratic chairman of the Children, Family Committee when I worked there. But we do not agree on a lot of policies. When we propose things like the malpractice or giving tax incentives for some types of volunteers, what he would say is so you are saying that the poor should have more legal protections than the rich. Mr. Phillips. Yes. Mr. Souder. Similar for volunteers. Why should a doctor be able to deduct that and not somebody who works at a gas station who goes and donates their time? Mr. Phillips. Well, that is why if you read this, and I probably should have done even more of it, I started off with doctors, nurses and dentists and teachers and then I said and plumbers, electricians and other professionals who are donating time that they normally bill. And this could probably be an improved point if I wanted to. In other words, if in fact you bill for your time and you are willing to donate that to a non-profit that is helping the poor, it does seem to me that the time ought to be tax deductible as well as the materials. Mr. Souder. So you are going to turn it into a billing---- Mr. Phillips. So an optometrist can come down to this school and donate his time and check your vision and could write off the glasses that he gives, but not the time for the examinations. That is the point of No. 3. Mr. Souder. I will tell you that the slippery slope here is that a laborer working on an assembly line really is only selling his time as well, and he could take a second job in the evening. The practical thing, and this is what we have to sort through in public policy, is that yes but the fact is we do not have enough doctors and nurses. So is our goal here to get the community served or is our goal here to reward certain people at the expense of other people? Mr. Phillips. Exactly. Mr. Souder [continuing]. Because this is the classic equity question. Do we want to lift all votes if it means some get richer and poorer. And that is one of the challenges here. But it certainly needs to be looked at because we do not know what to do with these underserved areas. Mr. Phillips. That is right. Mr. Souder. You have a number here that are very interesting because they involve Federal Government actions, which become much more explosive because these criteria would need to be available to all nonprofits, not just faith-based. But then we will zero in on the faith-based portions. I assume here in L.A. there is a lot of Federal property where there has been a lot of shifting and the question is, and you mentioned about vehicles, too, about putting them for sale and allowing faith-based groups to in effect--I have one bill, I will show you my diverse interest. I have a bill on lighthouses. And one of the things on lighthouses was as the Coast Guard is getting rid of all these lighthouses and the Department of Interior, who should get first crack at them? And if there have been volunteer groups that have sustained the lighthouses, they should get first crack, they should not go up for sale. And this is a similar type concept because I know we did it in lighthouses, therefore it is not impossible to do in other Federal property. But you would then get into do you really want, are we going to change the environmental liability? There are lots of questions with it, but you have raised a whole series of things that are fascinating, particularly in areas where you have a lot of government such as the buses to go to camps. Mr. Phillips. Exactly. Mr. Souder. Because we have buses everywhere. Mr. Phillips. Yes, you do. Mr. Souder. Mr. Allen, do you have any comments on these or any other suggestions you would want to add? I mean, it is fascinating to actually have a list to work off of, because part of the goals of these hearings are to say what can we do as a practical matter to forward the debate beyond where we have been stuck on just kind of traditional cash funds. Because in fact, if we donate buses, if we give tax incentives we are not saying, look, the local welfare department is not doing well enough, we are going to transfer it over to this faith- based group. We are trying to expand the pie rather than argue over how to divide the pie. Mr. Phillips. That is exactly right. Mr. Allen. I would agree with Dr. Phillips on those comments as well. Absolutely. And I would like to see you take that discussion even further. There are a lot of points. We could be here for the rest of the afternoon just discussing some of those. Mr. Souder. We are looking hard for ways where we can expand. If we get a beachhead in one or two of these. The tax revenue side is the hardest. We have fought this kind of, what I would term, baby-step fight over non-itemizers below a certain income being able to take $50. And you would think we were asking for some kind of huge--it is an asterisk in the Federal budget. And you would think it is like some huge thing and yet it is even blocked right now. And so I have been willing to take whatever low number they have. Because once we get our foot in the door---- Mr. Phillips. Exactly. Mr. Souder [continuing]. We will work for that forever to expand it. And I personally believe we should have gone for a tax deduction that broadened to more groups to build a broader base rather than just for, even though I believe the primary target should be the poor, quite frankly there just is not a big enough lobby. You have to have the environmental groups and the union foundations, and all that arguing for this, too, because there is just not enough constituency right now. And I am telling you, even in my district which is very religious where they know I have made this faith-based organizations and how to help them a primary thing, I will get 50 letters on that. But, man, you have one thing on taxing insurance buildup and I will get 3,000 letters on that. It is just a different dynamic in fighting for this, and that is why it has to be constant. Mr. Hooten, have you run into any problems with the statement of faith as you go out to do volunteering or different things? Mr. Hooten. No. Because of how ecumenical we are in our work in the community and also with the different kinds of outreaches that we start with the students with entrepreneurial vision and a desire to serve. They include community members in pulling these outreaches off and they do not ask. They just see that they have energy to be a part of it, and we do background checks to make sure that they are going to be safe with kids. But we do not ask them what their faith orientation is. Mr. Souder. Do you tell the students that they have to be cautious about sharing their faith while they are volunteering for another organization? Mr. Hooten. No. We do not say that they need to be cautious about that. We talk to them about what their personal motivation is in being out there. But we leave it up to them to be sensitive. We want them to go out, and this is a big point for me everywhere that I speak. That they need to go out as learners. And so they should not be there first to speak, whether it is about their faith or anything. They should be there first to listen and find out what the needs are and not assume that they know what the needs are in any given situation. Mr. Souder. Have you ever had any complaints from any organization that any of your students started sharing the faith and did not represent the organization? Mr. Hooten. No. Quite the opposite. Especially Foothill AIDS project, for instance. I had a phone call with their executive director recently and I just asked how are things going there. My question was with concern, like the concern that I am hearing behind your question, like are students causing a problem there. And he said, you know what? Your volunteers are my best volunteers because they really have a heart for these young men and women who are dying. Mr. Souder. And why do you believe they have that heart? Mr. Hooten. I believe because they feel that they are there to serve the Christ within the people that they are seeing. As far as my perspective on the New Testament, as a response to the Old Testament, is that when I serve someone, I am actually getting to serve Christ. So it is incarnational in that they be the presence of Christ as they serve Christ. Mr. Souder. What did you think of my comment in the first panel in responding to the question of grant writing? Have you ever looked at any of your department providing any kind of assistance on a systematic way to these groups as they seek funding? Mr. Hooten. Yes, sir. There are a couple of issues that we are dealing with at the university right now. You mentioned the issue of homosexuality. That is one that our board of trustees and president and other different schools are talking about. Because every employee of the university does have to sign a statement of faith. The students do not, but the employees do. And that is including faculty and staff. But I know, for instance, there was one grant that we were denied recently, and I believe that it was a State grant. And it had been transferred along with the professor who moved from one of the Cal State schools to Azusa Pacific University. And the Cal State school, they did not want it because she is the one who dreamed it up. They wanted her to take it with her, so when she moved to APU, she lost the grant because the school having a faith orientation. And all it was was to provide health services to the homeless. Mr. Souder. So it was not anything necessarily relevant to that, but they are basically saying a statement of faith that violates a civil rights issue in a local community or State makes you ineligible for that grant? Mr. Hooten. Yes, sir. Mr. Phillips. That is happening more and more to us, too. Not just grants with foundations, but even businesses. Mr. Souder. The Salvation Army in Chicago, obviously, has had a big issue with this. Has that happened in Los Angeles at all? Mr. Allen. Yes. We have had issues relating to the domestic partners and, obviously, we have had to pull out from certain contracts within the city because of that. So we have lost out on a lot of funding in respect to certain programs pertaining to the city. And, you know, we also face an uphill battle. I mean, when we first started in Bethesda House, which is a facility for families with AIDS in Los Angeles, at the time it was about 1992. And in the AIDS community it was obviously predominately the gay men who were involved in this. And to come up with a Christian family model, it did not sit particularly well when we first showed up, as it were. And there was a lot of suspicion. But over the years, I think it was in 1997 it won the city award for excellence. And I guess they had to recognize the fact that the program spoke for itself. And gradually there has been an acceptance. So it can work both ways around as well. And it was important to be a presence there. It really did effect families. And, you know, it is important as we heard about salt and light, we have to be where we have to be. And that was a really important move to be involved in that process. And like I say, we expanded that facility about 2 years ago into Silver Lake where we now provide services for up to 44 families at any one time. Mr. Souder. Pastor Baker, in New Mexico when you are in the prisons, have you run into any of these types of debates? Pastor Baker. No, sir. New Mexico, I have made nine trips in the last 3 years. I sat down with the Secretary of Corrections all the way down to the people who receive the drug programs in prisons. And it has been accepted without any battle to date. And I keep praying that it will continue that way. I sat down with wardens who are not Christians and are glad to share that with me, but they also share what the program has meant to their facility and wish it could be expanded to more pods. Mr. Souder. With hoping not to open up a can of worms, why do you believe that we have run into less resistance in the prisons? Pastor Baker. Because I think everything else they have tried has failed. I think they have turned into warehouses. And I think if you really talk to somebody in the industry they will tell you that is what they have become. And they have looked at everything else. As a matter of fact, I won't give a name on this, but I have had a high ranking official tell me that we have tried everything else. The only thing left is Jesus Christ. Mr. Souder. There has also been a tradition of different faiths being able to go into the prisons. Pastor Baker. Yes. Mr. Souder. And in trying to look at that kind of model, because it is volunteer. Pastor Baker. Yes. Mr. Souder. No body is forced to go in. Pastor Baker. Right. Mr. Souder. You have a pattern of any faith who chooses to go in, can go in. Pastor Baker. Correct. Mr. Souder. So it is not exclusive. But in trying to figure out why that model is there is really fascinating as we plunge into other categories. Because clearly there is less resistance. Almost every State is experimenting with this because it is just miserable. Mr. Allen. Well, my experience with the sheriff in L.A. County jails is he wants to reduce the population. And he can see that programs, particularly faith-based programs, really work and really make an impact. And we have just recently established a program where we are actually picking up inmates now. Literally, when they come out of that jail, they have to make a decision whether they go this way or whether they go back to what they have known. And we have a great relationship with the Sheriff's Department where we can actually pick them up in a minibus and actually take them straight away to a program. It has even been taken further than that the Sheriff's Department have started preliminary work with these inmates knowing that if they are going to go to a certain program, they can start that process. So we have no resistance either. We have the same experience, particularly with the jail system and correctional services. Mr. Souder. I am going to take a couple of minutes, because I want to pursue this just a little bit farther. A couple of things. In recidivism, Pastor Baker you used some numbers, do you track them for some period of time after they have been out? How long? Pastor Baker. Basically after a year. And we have been doing it for 3 years. So we have had them go through the program. And probably the longest term of someone being outside has been about 18 months. So we do not have 10 years and seeing what is happening in 10 years. But we do know, and I believe pretty strongly in those numbers I gave, I said again they were artificial, but I got those from the States that---- Mr. Souder. Do you know whether there is any kind of Federal effort? Because one of the frustrating things having worked with this for a long time is you never meet anybody whose recidivism is high. Now, you usually only get to meet a small percentage of the people. Pastor Baker. Right. Mr. Souder. But one of the things I wanted from the Federal standpoint, are you tracking them on an individual name-by-name basis? Pastor Baker. Yes. Mr. Souder. So if they go into another State system and not in New Mexico, you would still find them? Pastor Baker. We are not there yet, no. No, sir. Mr. Souder. OK. So we need some kind of Federal oversight idea if we are really going to track recidivism. Pastor Baker. Right. Mr. Souder. We need to know whether they are winding up in other States? Pastor Baker. Correct. Right. Mr. Souder. That would be true, however, of programs existing as well. Pastor Baker. Right. Mr. Souder. There is nothing like this. It is just when we try to zero in from the Federal level, we do not want to do this kind of like what we do in neighborhoods, is you jumped from one and then move over here. The goal is to change people. Pastor Baker. That is right. Mr. Souder. Not to have numbers. Have you at either the Salvation Army or in your programs, when somebody comes out of prison, do you also have: (a) followup programs for them after they have come out of prison, and; (b) what is your interaction with the governmental social service structure in matching? Pastor Baker. Well what we have been very successful in is because we have done two exercises for churches in New Mexico in the last 2 years trying to get more and more churches of all denominations to start Celebrate Recovery ministries in their church. Not just for their own people, they need them there, too, but also when the inmate is released, then they can immediately give them, if they are going to Hobbs, NM, some churches that have Celebrate Recovery programs so they can continue right on with their support system that they had in prison into the same program. And the other thing that we are finding is one of the key contributors to the recidivism rate being so high is they go back to the family who has not had any recovery and the same neighborhood and the same individuals, and their same actions. So if we can get their families into a recovery program while they are inside going through a recovery program, we will have just a changed life in prison, we have a changed life on the outside when they come back. And that is kind of a unique concept that we have. Mr. Allen. We did it slightly differently. It is not with primarily correction services. When they come out of the jail we would target, for instance, veterans groups which may make up something like a third of the homeless population. So we have a 200 bed facility in West L.A. on the VA campus which we work with. So we would be able to track certain statistical data, but it is not under the umbrella of the correctional services. They may go under the umbrella of the mental health program at Bell Shelter, and maybe with veterans it could be a substance abuse program. And so it is slightly different in the way we operate it. But, obviously, we keep good statistical data on that. And it could be tracked back, I guess. Mr. Souder. How do we sort through, and just state for the record, I kind of know what your answers are going to be to this. How much do you think the success is the program in the prison itself, and how much is the fact that you have the after care follow through because certainly we would improve recidivism if we just had organized after care follow through and the family recovery? Because we have programs for years that tried to deal with families, but we have not had kind of systematic. And then if you can also state for the record how much do you think the faith component of that is that? In other words, if we had a secular-based program that taught people literacy in the prisons, had a follow through where some people were helping them and they were supporting them in the community, would you have the same recidivism or do you think this is also a head change? And how is that for a setup? Pastor Baker. That is OK. I believe it is a heart change. And it comes from they do have the therapeutic models that they go through, and that they have to go through in the State of New Mexico. However, when they get out they can go to AA or NA. But I think there is a part of the program that I have seen in New Mexico that the churches are doing. It is a connection. It is when someone is paroled, we give them where to go and there are people there waiting for them. And it is an automatic acceptance. Where someone is coming out of prison, as someone shared earlier today, they still cannot find a job. And it is tough to come out with a record. And certainly to walk into a church, because it is pretty scary. So if they can walk in where people are waiting. Not walk in, but where somebody is bringing them to the church or to a facility like the Salvation Army does that they are going to get connected a lot quicker. And, of course, I believe the heart change is the biggest one. Because in prison you have heard a lot of conversion stories, but it is a conversion story and that is it. They go to a chapel service on a Sunday and some other group comes in on the next Sunday and they sit there for an hour and they go to church. But this is an actual program that if they work through it and if they are honest, it is going to allow Christ to change their life. Mr. Souder. The tough part of being a legislator, and there is not any other way of saying this other than this on the record. As an individual, their heart change I believe is really important for their eternal salvation. Pastor Baker. Yes. Mr. Souder. As a public figure what I am concerned about is when the taxpayers invest money is that important or not important? Because if it does not matter, then it would not matter in our public policy. But if in fact it does matter for a percentage, even if it is only 30 or 50 percent, then that ought to be a factor on how we do public policy. Pastor Baker. I think it is extremely important. Because I think what they did in the past they are not going to do today. Mr. Souder. They have discovered a higher purpose, and that is what we are talking about. Mr. Allen. Right. And I think the key is the radical change in lifestyle, may be a good way to put over. Because, you know, when you have been living on the streets or you're having substance abuse problems and we have men and women 20, 25 years and then suddenly they make a faith commitment and that is huge. That is a huge factor. And one of the reasons I demonstrated or talked briefly about the camp with 5 days which was a very strong gospel message right away through, that had a huge impact and you could actually trace that to the statistical change. And when you interviewed the men and women, that is what they will come out with. And, you know, we have to be honest about that, that is a huge part of the success rate. Also, the relationship with the jail that we talked about earlier, that really helps to connect them at the time when they come out, when you have an understanding with the Sheriff's Department or the jail or prison facilities. That is another big factor in being able to work with them from day one. But I would still say that the faith-based initiatives and the radical change in lifestyle has a massive impact on the success rate. And I have said before, when I was a probation officer we had very committed staff members, but in many cases we were sticking Band-Aids on situations. I wish we could have talked to them about our own Christian lifestyle and how that could impact them. We were prohibited from doing so by the government. But in this setting we are allowed to talk about that and we are allowed to offer voluntary church services and Bible studies which many of the men and women who are searching for a new way in life would actually participate in. And we see the effects and we see the results. Pastor Baker. I think another indicator of that would be, again, what I said about the wardens. They are seeing changes in prison in the way they act. Mr. Allen. Right. Mr. Souder. Yes. One of the more compelling testimonies that we have had, is that we had this young guy who is in Chicago who spent his earnings and his time, he has just decided to go out. And he goes out on the street and has done this for years with a few others. It's a Catholic ministry that tires to get men who are male prostitutes to change. And one of the Democratic Members just put him under heavy cross examination whether he had to have faith as a component. And finally he says if you do not change them, you know, what reason am I giving that they are doing is wrong to get them off the street if I do not have a compelling reason. Now, that is one of the real value judgment things that those who agree with that are going to agree with. Those who do not believe necessarily it was wrong to: (a) be a prostitute or a male prostitute questioned the whole premise of the program. And it is just really interesting to struggle with. Mr. Gold, I will let you have a word here. Because you come to all this, interestingly, because you came from outside the social service and went in and are looking at it more like a business guy. When I first went with the Children and Family Committee, I came out of the furniture retailing business and I wander in there, and the first thing I see is there is little outcome accountability, messy bookkeeping, people constantly still come up to me and say, yes, but if we invest this much into preventing the delinquency, we will save this much from going to prison. Yes, but the problem is that many of those kids work it out. And if you spend it up front on 10 and 8 of them would have worked it out on their own, the fact that it costs the government more than if you put it in. But the math is bad. The motives are wonderful. What do you see are some of the things as we look at the these type of organizations between faith-based organizations that we should be looking at from the standpoint of investing taxpayer's money in the most effective ways that you have seen come in? Mr. Gold. Well, let me first say that everyone on this panel does beautiful work, and I agree that in a lot of the programs that are being run, the carrot that is dangled to try to get these people to change has to be there. I would not ever disagree with that. I, obviously, come from a little bit of a different perspective in Judaism that has never been one of evangelism and spreading the Word, so it is slightly different for me ideologically. But I am also sort of walking the line of running this organization, like you said earlier, there is your personal belief and then there is your role as a public servant. My personal belief is that the government should not cross a very fine line. I do believe that programs like everything that is done here on this table need to exist to create a safety net in the fabric and infrastructure of society to keep us all sane and keep the world from crumbling. But I do believe that where the government should invest its resources and energy is in teaching how to fish and not doing the fishing. And I believe, and this could be quite controversial, that the minute the government begins investing too heavily in funding sources for organizations, whether they be faith-based or not, is the day we become entirely too dependent on them. I think that there are several articles and several studies that have been done recently, and even there is significant rounding areas in these studies like McKinsey did one on the capacity that exists within America, I think it ended up in the hundreds of billions of excess capacity and it could convert to $40,000 for each child to go to college or something like that; of the waste that exists in the nonprofit industry. That is the biggest thing I have noticed in making this transfer into this nonprofit world is the lack of efficiency. I think if some things could be done, there are some great ideas tossed around earlier about resources for nonprofits. I think if we could create an environment where nonprofits could focus on their core competency in terms of serving the program and not in the areas of administrative, HR benefits, learning how to write grants and all these things. Their areas should be focused on selling their program and raising money and in exchange for that I think those would be dollars spent better long term. I think it is fine to throw some money at it today. I think a couple generations from now if the government has crossed the line of funding a program in the prisons, for instance, while it may be working and I believe that the success rates have probably proven that it does, I am not sure that is where the government should invest its dollars. Our organization does not get government funding. I think we have many success stories as well about investing in the life of a child. And one of the testaments to our program is having young kids that come back, some kids of these neighborhoods right here in Watts and some very tough neighborhoods that come back for our program year after year and then end up getting up on the right track because we invested, and they only come to camp for 1 week over the course of a summer. But over the course of several years, they believe in themselves because we have built up their self-esteem and it is the one highlight of their year. They go on to college. And one kid in particular came back last summer to be a counselor for us. He had put himself through college and got an aerospace engineering degree. And instead of graduating in May and taking a $80,000 a year job, he decided to come back and spend one more summer with us as a counselor to invest in the same kids that he used to be like. There is no faith involved in that from our perspective as an organization. We do not spread the Word of God. We do not work that way, that is just not the culture of our organization. So I think that there are many, many organizations out there like ours, and many of these on our panel today as well, that could benefit better from resource efficiencies. There is a huge issue that I am sure Congress is looking at now, the generation of wealth transference that is about to occur in the next 20 years and the trillions of dollars that if we deployed into our economy in the nonprofit world would be so better spent. I am from the State of Hawaii. Hawaii has probably one of the worst State governments in the country. They got themselves so fixed, the economy got so bloated based on tax revenue requirements that they cannot get themselves out. It is like a heroin addict. They cannot get out of it. They just keep having to come back to the well. And they have taxed so many businesses out of the State. So my only fear is that if you just put my own personal belief system aside of the separation of church and State, I see it more as an issue of efficiency and long term viability for many organizations and not tapping the government resources for funding today, but resources for tomorrow, infrastructure issues. Setting up--what was the name of that? Community Partners here in L.A. I had actually never heard of that. Doing some kind of a regionalized system similar to the regional neonatal intensive care units that exist for babies with birth defects. I mean, setting up a regionalized system of something like Community Partners for organizations to go to, I think that would free up millions and billions of dollars that the government would not have to tax or find tax credits or play cat and mouse games with. Pastor Baker. Could I respond to that? Mr. Souder. Yes. And what I will do is if each of you have any concluding comments and then anything else you want to submit for the record. Pastor Baker. I would just like to thank you for being invited today. And just to kind of put my spin on that, is that the State and the Federal Government are already spending money when 8 out of 10 prisoners come back. It cost a lot of money to warehouse somebody in prison. I will leave it at that. Mr. Souder. Mr. Allen. Mr. Allen. I would just like to respond and say I would agree about the teach the man to fish philosophy. I think we all sitting around this table are agreeing with that, very much in support of the continuing care. When people come into a program, we are looking to make a real impact and we want to see solutions, we do not just want to perpetuate the problem. And it gets back to what you said earlier about possibilities of initiatives with faith-based programs where we would be looking out. I would very much support that. That if we can demonstrate through outcomes and through what we have achieved through the programs, I think that would be a huge step forward. Mr. Souder. Dr. Phillips. Mr. Phillips. Well, I would even go a step further. Mr. Souder. If you could come up with another 17 things, that would be great, too. I can see the staff panicking. Mr. Phillips. I can do that. Rather than just teach a man to fish, we would like to help him buy the pond. Because they buy into the system and there are entrepreneurial instincts and everybody in this neighborhood. If we can help that, it starts to turn things around. The government can help, though, with some of these very specific things. And while you said it is really hard to measure preventative stuff, I would say in response to that to quote Christy Mathison, the great baseball player, ``It is a lot easier to build a boy than to remake a man.'' And so when you are looking at schools, systemically, when you are looking at vocational training, especially with young people who are growing up today who want to work, but because of minimum wage laws, child labor laws and if they have not got an uncle or an employer friend or a mom or a dad who owns a business, it is pretty tough. There are things there that the government can grease the wheels, and allow us to do positive things, that in the long run is extremely cost effective. I think there ought to be some sort of a partnership. Tax dollars are generated for most of us in this room. And to come back with efficiency in that in order to help touch the poor, to redeem, to empower, to equip the poor is not only a very Biblical thing, it is a very American thing. Mr. Souder. Mr. Hooten. Mr. Hooten. Yes, sir. I would like to respond specifically to the question that you asked about faith orientation if blatant faith orientation or a lack of it would impact the effectiveness of what we do. And I would say, yes, Azusa Pacific would not have the requirement that it has if it were not a Christian university. It was founded in 1899 as a training school for Christian workers. And that is how we maintain our identity is through that. Also, on the subject of identity, Aristotle when describing virtue wrote that virtue means fulfilling one's intended purpose. And in that sense of the word or in that understanding of the word virtue, a virtuous knife is one that cuts well. And so the question that we ask at APU and I can speak for Christian organizations that I work with, what does it mean for us to fulfill our intended purpose? And that is why I think we see changes in people, in prisoner's lives or the people that we work with who are homeless who can get off crack and things that I think otherwise would destroy them is because they have discovered their intended purpose. And so not only in the community that we are serving, but the student population we have I work very hard to remind them of their intended purpose. Because many of them have come from Christian organizations that have not taught them the identity that we shared about, that who we really are meant to be. And that doesn't mean that we go out with words in my opinion first, but we go out with actions and love. And then when relationships are developed, we can talk about those things that sustain us and really give us purpose. Mr. Souder. Well, I thank you all for taking time out of your busy schedule. Let me just share a couple of closing thoughts here. You are kind of getting to see some of the sausage making of government. But when we had a meeting with Steve Goldsmith when George Bush was running for President with Senator Santorum, Congressman Pitts and I, and Steve Goldsmith said what he was having trouble figuring out is why we could not move this type of legislation through Washington. What is the problem? And my answer, which has proven to be true again as they have had to back up a little bit, is that there is no clear constituency. That the Republican Party is mostly suburban and rural base and it likes faith-based ideas as long as it seems to be transferring funds to those Members' districts. But when it goes to the urban poor, they are not as excited about the issue. The Democrats do not like the idea as much about the faith-based. And even though it gives more money to the urban poor, they are concerned about separation of church and State to a higher degree. Therefore, this issue does not have a large constituency. But it keeps in the public debate. And this is the one question that I believe is why we are able to make small incremental gains even if it is not going to be large. Because when I ask my Democratic colleagues, you know, it does not matter who is Governor of California, California is still broke. And there are only so many bonds they are going to be able to do. You can sit there and say we do not want to have faith-based organizations leveraging their funds in, but every juvenile probation officer is having their case load go up, everybody who is doing child abuse in the State is not putting in anymore money. And you can go across the whole nation and it does not matter if you have a Republican legislature or Democratic legislature, it does not matter what they ran on, the fact is that social service spending is flat and barely able to keep up at a time when we are having more family disorientation, huge immigration groups come in with the economy going up and down. So the question is how are we going to address is. And that a segment of the faith community, whether those who disagree or not, are not going to come to the table unless there are some accommodations. Now at the same time the faith community needs to understand what the target is here. And I want to pay personal tribute here to Dr. Phillips, because he has had a big impact on my life and many others. Because there is a very small group of people who have kept these issues alive for a long time. And when we were in Newark, Judith Kemp was with me whose Dad is Jack Kemp. And his mom for the record had as kids talked as a family discussion about giving money to World Impact and their importance of commitment to the poor in their family. Now, it is not a surprise that when Jack Kemp became head of HUD, he was one of the first people that initiated from the Republican side some of the urban poverty questions and had this. And that he and that some of the people in the Bush administration who are implementing these programs have had some long interaction with this. And it is not whether it gets votes. It is not whether it is politically popular to do. It is a question of how else do you propose to do it if you are in the public sector. And then as individuals do you believe we in fact are commanded to help the rich or the poor? And there is just not enough of a sentiment yet, and what I am hoping and if you have anything to add to these lists, the great advantage of specifics is that we have a bill out there that in actuality the three people, four people who were most opposed to the faith-based legislation, Congressman Bobby Scott from Virginia, Chet Edwards from Texas, Jerry Nadler from New York and I'm blanking on the fourth right now. And I and a couple of the primary advocates sat down, and once we took the direct funding out, they agreed to go along with training and building the ability to seek grants for faith-based organizations from foundations, for example, and training capacity things. I think we can maybe sell them on a couple of these type of things. Some of them they will not, some of them they will. But when the politics erupted, they got flak from the left even though they were all great ACLU card carrying members, and we got flak from the right. And the President basically tried to move forward the way it is. But I think they are open to some as we try to work this through. Because the truth is: one, it's working, and; two, we don't have a whole ton of other options. And you said it really well. You didn't even slip in what people really need is a purpose driven life. Pastor Baker. I didn't. Mr. Souder. In fact, in trying to focus people, that is one of the things we do. And there is no way if you can communicate to each of the students who volunteer, your staffers, the people at the Salvation Army who are down there both volunteering and working everyday, the kids out being Big Brothers and Big Sisters to kids who do not have it and to all the people down in the prisons who are trying to help people from destroying their families with drugs and alcohol abuse, the thanks from the government which they do not often get. I met a man from InterVarsity in Newark. I was visiting Carolyn Wallace I think who had an outreach there. But this guy was from InterVarsity and had spent, if I recall, nearly 30 years of life and had not had a day's vacation and basically ran this home for 30 years. And what he told me is I came here to save the East coast, then it was New Jersey, then it was Newark, then it was South Newark, then it was the neighborhood, then it was the block, then if I can get to one kid at a time. And it is people like that that show how we can give them the incentives, how we can say thanks that really makes a difference. So thanks for being part of this process. We would welcome any further input you have as we go through. The hearing stands adjourned. [Whereupon, at 3:24 p.m., the subcommittee was adjourned.] [Additional information submitted for the hearing record follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.035 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.036 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.037 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.038 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.039 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.040 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.041 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.042 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.043 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.044 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.045 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.046 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.047 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.048 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.049 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.050 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.051 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.052 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.053 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.054 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.055 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.056 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.057 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.058 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.059 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.060 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.061 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.062 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.063 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.064 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.065 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.066 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.067 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.068 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.069 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.070 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.071 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.072 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.073 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.074 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.075 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.076 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.077 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.078 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.079 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.080 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.081 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.082 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.083 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.084 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.085 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.086 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.087 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.088 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.089 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.090 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.091 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.092 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.093 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.094 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.095 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.096 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.097 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.098 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.099 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.100 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.101 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.102 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.103 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.104 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.105 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.106 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.107 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.108 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.109 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.110 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.111 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.112 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.113 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.114 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.115 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.116 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.117 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.118 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.119 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.120 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.121 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.122 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.123 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.124 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.125 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.126 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.127 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.128 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.129 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.130 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.131 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.132 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.133 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.134 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.135 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.136 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.137 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.138 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.139 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.140 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.141 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.142 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.143 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T4157.144 <all>