Tongass Home » Projects
& Plans » Forest Plan
» Forest Plan Amendments
Forest Plan Amendment
Kensington Gold Project
This amendment to the Forest
Plan modifies the Small Old Growth Reserves in VCUs 160, 190, and
200 to better meet size, location and habitat composition criteria.
The decision to amend the Forest
Plan was documented in the Record of Decision for the Kensington Gole
Project signed by the Forest Supervisor on December 9, 2004.
December 9, 2004
Juneau Ranger District
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090120055849im_/http://www.fs.fed.us/r10/tongass/images/hruler04.gif)
Small Old Growth Habitat Reserve Adjustments in VCUs
160, 190, and 200
Non-significant Forest Plan Amendment
During the development of the 1997 Forest Plan Final Environmental
Impact Statement, a conservation strategy was designed to ensure
that implementation of the Forest Plan would provide a reasonable assurance
of maintaining viable and well-distributed wildlife populations across
the Tongass National Forest for 100 years. As part of this conservation
strategy, a forest-wide system of large, medium, and small Old-Growth
Habitats or Reserves (OGRs) was established and a set of standards and
guidelines developed to preserve the integrity of the forest’s old-growth
ecosystem. The habitats have been identified and mapped in the 1997
Forest Plan.
The Old-Growth Habitat land use designation provides for evaluation
and possible adjustment of the location of the habitats based on site-specific
information. Where feasible, the boundaries should follow geographic
features so that they can be recognized in the field. The 1997 Forest
Plan Record of Decision committed the Forest Service to work with
the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADG&G) and the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) to review the location, size, and suitability
of the OGRs during project-level planning.
As part of the Kensington Gold Project analysis, three small OGRs were
identified within the project area (Figure 1). Small OGRs require a
contiguous landscape of at least 16 percent of the total Value Comparison
Unit (VCU) area and 50 percent of this area must be productive old-growth
timber. Along with the general criteria of size and productivity, connectivity
is also a criterion. The design of each habitat should be based on wildlife
concerns specific to the area. Criteria commonly used in designing small
habitats include important deer winter range, probable goshawk nesting
habitat, probable marbled murrelet nesting habitat, large forest blocks,
rare plant associations, and landscape linkages. VCUs are distinct geographic
areas encompassing one or more large stream systems with boundaries
that follow watershed divides.
The study area includes three VCUs (160, 190, and 200) with a small
OGR within each. The Forest Service, ADF&G, and USFWS conducted an interagency
review of the existing mapped small OGRs in November 2003. The review
team determined that none of the mapped small OGRs in the study area
met the requirements for size or the amount of productive old growth
established under the Forest Plan and recommended nonsignificant modifications
to each of the small OGRs. The findings and recommendation of the interagency
review team are summarized below by VCU and explained in more detail
in Appendix F of the 2004 Kensington Gold Project Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (SEIS).
VCU 160
Finding: The small OGR in VCU 160 does not meet Forest Plan
standards and guidelines for size. This small OGR covers 802 acres and
is 573 acres short of the 16 percent of VCU requirement.
Recommendation: Increase the size of the small OGR in VCU
160. The redrawn boundaries of this OGR will border but not include
the tailings storage facility, access roads, pipeline, and maintenance
access facilities.
VCU 190
Finding: The small OGR in VCU 190 does not meet the Forest
Plan standards and guidelines for size nor percentage of productive
old growth (POG) needed. This small OGR covers 1,299 acres and is 106
acres short of the 16 percent of VCU requirement. Existing POG is 615
acres; 106 acres short of the 50 percent POG requirement.
Recommendation: Expand to the north in light of existing natural
fragmentation and limited amounts of productive old growth.
VCU 200
Finding: The small OGR within VCU 200 does not meet the Forest
Plan standards and guidelines for productive old growth. Existing POG
is 648 acres; 227 acres short of the 50 percent POG requirement.
Recommendation: Due to the naturally fragmented area, additional
acres were used in the adjacent VCU160. Appendix K of the Forest Plan
allows for up to 30 percent of an OGR to be mapped in an adjacent VCU
if the resulting habitat achieves the objectives of the old-growth habitats.
The interagency review team agreed that expanding the small OGR in VCU
200 to include portions of VCU 160 would increase connectivity values,
capture important beach and estuary fringe habitats and riparian habitats,
and include highervolume stands. The approximately 36 percent of the
recommended modified OGR would extend into VCU 160.
The Secretary of Agriculture's implementing regulation indicates the
determination of significance is to be "…based on an analysis of the
objectives, guidelines and other contents of the forest plan" (36 CFR
219.10(f)). The Forest Service has issued guidance for determining what
constitutes a "significant amendment" under the National Forest Management
Act. This guidance, in Forest Service Handbook (FSH) 1909.12 - Chapter
5.32, identifies four factors to be used in determining whether a proposed
change to a forest plan is significant or not significant. These four
factors are (1) timing; (2) location and size; (3) goals, objectives,
and outputs; and (4) management prescriptions. An analysis of the factors
is presented below.
Timing - The Tongass Forest Plan Revision was completed in 1997.
The Old-Growth Habitat land use designation provides for evaluation
and possible adjustment of the location of the habitats based on site-specific
information. Project level analysis for the Kensington Gold Project
in 2003 determined that existing OGRs in the study area did not meet
Forest Plan standards and guidelines.
Location and Size - These modifications increase the size of
three small OGRs to meet Forest Plan standards and guidelines and better
preserve areas of old-growth forest and their associated natural ecological
processes to provide habitat for old-growth associated resources. OGRs
in VCUs 160, 190, and 200 will be increased in size by 652,163, and
458 acres, respectively.
Goals, Objectives, and Outputs
The boundary modifications approved here will increase the connectivity
from higher elevations to the beach and estuary fringe habitats and
additional riparian habitat, and would increase the number of intact
patches of medium- and high-volume old-growth stands. Maintaining forested
corridors between OGRs or other non-development land use designations
is a key component to maintaining viable wildlife populations on the
forest.
Management Prescriptions - These recommendations would move
1,615 acres of productive old growth in land use designations suitable
for timber harvest, into OGRs unsuited for timber harvest. Table A-
1 summarizes the cumulative effects of small OGR adjustments on the
Forest to date. Individually and cumulatively the changes to acres suitable
for timber harvest are minor.
Table A-1. Effects of Forest Plan
Amendments on Acres Suitable for Timber Harvest as of December 2004
Project |
Non-Development to
Development LUD Suitable Acres |
Development to Non-Development LUD
Suitable Acres |
Net Change in Suitable Acres |
Kensington Gold EIS |
0 |
1,615 |
-1,615 |
Threemile EIS |
458 |
826 |
-368 |
Madan EIS |
377 |
1,501 |
-1,124 |
Finger Mountain EIS |
0 |
593 |
-593 |
Cholmondeley EIS |
894 |
6,873 |
-5,979 |
Woodpecker EIS |
180 |
130 |
+50 |
Salty EA |
99 |
126 |
-27 |
Luck Lake EIS |
257 |
794 |
-537 |
Polk Small Sales EA |
0 |
153 |
-153 |
Doughnut EIS |
0 |
19 |
-19 |
Kuakan |
416 |
542 |
-126 |
Sea Level EIS |
185 |
500 |
-315 |
Canal Hoya EIS |
0 |
151 |
-151 |
Chasina EIS |
0 |
78 |
-78 |
Control Lake EIS |
446 |
142 |
+304 |
Crystal Creek EIS |
481 |
1153 |
-672 |
Nemo Loop EA |
177 |
932 |
-755 |
Todahl Backline EA |
2 |
363 |
-361 |
Fire Cove Salvage EA |
186 |
633 |
-447 |
Niblack EA |
252 |
0 |
+252 |
Total |
4,700 |
17,759 |
-13,059
|
Conclusion - Based on the analysis and recommendations of the
interagency review team and the significance analysis above, the OGRs
within VCUs 160, 190, and 200 will be modified as described in Appendix
F of the 2004 Kensington Gold Project SEIS and shown in Figure 2. No
direct or indirect effects on OGR is expected other than the positive
effect of adjusting the boundaries of the existing small OGRs to comply
with Forest Plan standards and guidelines. This amendment is fully consistent
with current Forest Plan goals and objectives.
This analysis in combination with the 2004 Kensington Gold Project
SEIS and ROD document my decision to amend the Forest Plan with a non-significant
amendment expanded OGRs in VCUs 160, 190, and 200.
Forrest Cole |
12/9/2004 |
FORREST COLE
Forest Supervisor |
Date |
|