Tongass Home » Projects
& Plans » Forest Plan
» Forest Plan Amendments
Forest Plan Amendment
Luck Lake Timber Sales
This amendment to the Forest
Plan modifies the Small Old Growth Reserves in VCUs 581, 582, and
583 to better meet size, location and habitat composition criteria.
The decision to amend the Forest
Plan was documented in the Record of Decision for the Luck Lake Timber
Sales Project signed by the Forest Supervisor on June 27, 2000.
June 27, 2000
Thorne Bay Ranger District
Small Old Growth Habitat Reserve Adjustments in VCUs
581, 582, and 583
Non-significant Forest Plan Amendment
Based on the project level analysis process as described in the old-growth
management prescriptions and Appendix K of the Tongass National Forest
Land and Resource Management Plan of 1997 (Forest Plan), the small old-growth
reserves located in Value Comparison Units (VCU’s) 581, 582, and 583
in the Luck Lake Project Area have been adjusted to better meet size,
location, and habitat composition criteria in these VCU’s. The reserves
in VCU’s 581 and 583, as mapped in the Forest Plan, did not meet the
productive old-growth acreage requirement for small reserves, and the
reserves in VCU’s 582 and 583 did not meet the overall size requirements
based on the criteria specified in Appendix K of the Forest Plan.
The Secretary of Agriculture’s implementing regulation indicates the
determination of significance is to be “...based on an analysis of the
objectives, guidelines and other contents of the forest plan” (36 Code
of Federal Regulation (CFR) 219.10(f)). The Forest Service has issued
guidance for determining what constitutes a “significant amendment”
under the National Forest Management Act. This guidance, in the Forest
Service Handbook (FSH) 1909.12 - Chapter 5.32, identifies four factors
to be used in determining whether a proposed change to the Forest Plan
is significant or not significant. These four factors are: (1) timing,
(2) location and size, (3) goals, objectives, and outputs, and (4) management
prescriptions.
Timing - The Forest Plan revision was completed in 1997 and
the Decision was modified in 1999. The old-growth habitat management
prescription in the Forest Plan indicates the small mapped reserves
have received differing levels of field verification and integration
of sitespecific information in their design. During project level environmental
analysis, for project areas that include or are adjacent to mapped old-growth
habitat reserves, the size, spacing, and habitat composition of mapped
reserves may be further evaluated.
Location and Size - The boundaries of the reserve in VCU 581,
and the boundaries and location of the reserve in VCU’s 582 and 583
have been adjusted (see Figure A1-1). The sizes of the adjusted oldgrowth
reserves in VCU’s 581, 582, and 583 are approximately 3,679 acres, 1,243
acres, and 975 acres, of which 523 acres, 408 acres, and 95 acres were
classified in Forest Plan calculations as suitable and available for
timber production.
Goals, Objectives, and Outputs
Goals - The Forest Plan goal for biodiversity is to maintain
healthy forest ecosystems; maintain a mix of habitats at different spatial
scales (i.e. site, watershed, island, province and Forest) capable of
supporting the full range of naturally occurring flora, fauna, and ecological
processes native to Southeast Alaska. The adjustments to the small old-growth
reserves are consistent with the goals of the Forest Plan.
Objectives - The Forest Plan objectives include: (1) to maintain
a Forest-wide system of old-growth forest habitat (includes reserves,
nondevelopment land use designations (LUD’s), and beach, estuary and
riparian corridors) to sustain old-growth associated species and resources
and (2) to ensure that the reserve system meets the minimum size, spacing
and composition criteria described in Appendix K of the Forest Plan.
The adjustments to these small old-growth reserves were specifically
designed to meet the Forest Plan objectives.
Outputs - Adjustments to the small old-growth reserves in VCU’s
581, 582, and 583 will have only minor effects on Forest Plan outputs.
Management Prescriptions - The small old-growth reserve has
been adjusted as noted in the Forest Plan Record of Decision and in
accordance with the Old-Growth LUD management prescription. None of
the standards and guidelines associated with the management prescriptions
have been changed.
Cumulative Changes - The Luck Lake Timber Sales is one of nine
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) decisions, as of March 2000,
to make non-significant amendments to the Forest Plan by modifying LUD
boundaries. The Niblack Environmental Assessment (EA) changed a Wild
River nondevelopment LUD to Old-Growth Habitat and Timber Management
LUD’s. The rest of the amendments involved enlargement or reduction
of Old-Growth Habitat LUD’s, usually exchanging acres with one of the
resource development LUD’s in order to more effectively meet Forest
Plan objectives. Usually, wherever an Old-Growth Habitat LUD expanded,
it caused a corresponding reduction of acres suitable for timber harvest.
Likewise, an Old-Growth Habitat LUD size reduction usually meant an
increase in suitable acres.
While the LUD changes within each project decision constituted non-significant
Forest Plan amendment, Table A1-1 displays the accumulated effect on
suitable acres for all projects. For each project, the table displays
suitable acres that were changed from a nondevelopment LUD to a resource
development LUD, or from a development LUD to Old-Growth Habitat. The
net change in suitable acres represents less than one percent of the
suitable land base.
Table A1-1. Effects of Forest
Plan Amendments on Acres Suitable for Timber Harvest as of May 2000
Project |
Non-Development to Development
LUD |
Development to Non-Development LUD
|
Net Change in Suitable Acres |
Luck Lake EIS |
257 |
794 |
-537 |
Salty EA |
99 |
126 |
-27 |
Kuakan |
416 |
542 |
-126 |
Sea Level EIS |
185 |
500 |
-315 |
Canal Hoya EIS |
0 |
151 |
-151 |
Chasina EIS |
0 |
78 |
-78 |
Control Lake EIS |
446 |
142 |
304 |
Crystal Creek EIS |
481 |
1153 |
-672 |
Nemo Loop EA |
177 |
932 |
-755 |
Todahl Backline EA |
2 |
363 |
-361 |
Niblack EA |
252 |
0 |
252 |
Sum
= |
2,315 |
4,781 |
-2,466
|
Conclusion - Based on a consideration of the factors above, I
conclude adoption of this amendment is not significant in a National
Forest Management Act context. This amendment is fully consistent with
current Forest Plan goals and objectives. The amendment provides added
detail on implementation of the old-growth habitat management prescriptions
of the Forest Plan.
Thomas Puchlerz |
6/27/2000 |
THOMAS PUCHLERZ
Forest Supervisor |
Date |
|