Visit the Education Indicators for the White House Return to SSBR Home |
This indicator presents information about the types of courses that graduates took during a 4-year high school curriculum and how many credits they earned in particular subject areas. Transcripts were collected from about 640 public schools and 80 private schools for the National Assessment of Education Progress 2005 High School Transcript Study (NAEP HSTS). These transcripts constituted a nationally representative sample of 26,000 public and private high school graduates, representing approximately 2.7 million 2005 high school graduates. The 2005 results are compared to the results of the 1990, 1994, 1998, and 2000 NAEP HSTSs.
Among the core course fields, graduates consistently earned the most credits in English, as shown in figure 1, followed by social studies, mathematics, and science. Graduates earned almost one credit more in English than in science and half a credit more than in mathematics. In comparison with their 1990 counterparts, the 2005 high school graduates earned more credits in each core course field.
As seen in figure 1, high school graduates in 2005 earned about 0.4 credits more than 1990 graduates in foreign languages and 0.5 credits more in fine arts and computer-related studies. Graduates earned more credits in each of these fields in 2005 than in 1990. However, computer-related studies was the only field among the other academic courses to show an increase in the credits earned compared with 2000 graduates.
In 2005, there was not a significant difference between the percentage of Black and White graduates completing a curriculum at or above midlevel, as seen in figure 2.1 This differed from 1990, when there was a 6 percentage point White-Black gap. Although not shown, White graduates continued to complete a rigorous curriculum at a higher rate than Black graduates (11 percent compared to 6 percent).
As shown in figure 3, the gap between White and Hispanic graduates in completing a curriculum at or above midlevel in 2005 was not significantly larger than in 2000 or 1990. Although not shown here, there was also no progress in reducing the White-Hispanic gap for the percentage who completed a standard-level curriculum or better during this time. For Hispanic graduates, the percentage completing a rigorous curriculum in 2005 was 3 percentage points less than their White counterparts (8 percent compared to 11 percent).