This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-03-939R 
entitled 'Foreign Military Sales: Air Force Does Not Use Controls to 
Prevent Spare Parts Containing Sensitive Military Technology from Being 
Released to Foreign Countries' which was released on October 10, 2003.

This text file was formatted by the U.S. General Accounting Office 
(GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part of a 
longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every 
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of 
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text 
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the 
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided 
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed 
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic 
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail 
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this 
document to Webmaster@gao.gov.

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately.

September 10, 2003:

The Honorable Tom Harkin:

United States Senate:

Subject: Foreign Military Sales: Air Force Does Not Use Controls to 
Prevent Spare Parts Containing Sensitive Military Technology from Being 
Released to Foreign Countries:

Dear Senator Harkin:

From 1990 through 2001, the Department of Defense delivered over $138 
billion in defense articles and services to foreign countries through 
its foreign military sales programs that included spare parts. Some 
sales occur under blanket order cases,[Footnote 1] which are 
requisitions for a specific dollar value and generally cover classes of 
parts that a country may need rather than a specific item within a 
class. The management of foreign military sales is especially critical 
given the need to prevent certain foreign countries from receiving 
parts that, if released, could be used against U.S. interests. This 
report stems from audit work performed in connection with our report, 
Foreign Military Sales: Improved Air Force Controls Could Prevent 
Unauthorized Shipments of Classified and Controlled Spare Parts to 
Foreign Countries.[Footnote 2] In that report, we address issues 
relating to classified spare parts that are restricted for national 
security reasons and controlled spare parts that are not classified but 
contain military technology[Footnote 3] or applications or are 
controlled cryptographic parts. During our work for that report, we 
observed a situation that brought into question Air Force internal 
controls to prevent unclassified or uncontrolled spare parts that 
contain sensitive military technology from being released to foreign 
countries ineligible to receive them. As agreed with your office, this 
report focuses on whether the Air Force has internal controls in place 
to prevent spare parts that contain sensitive military technology from 
being released to foreign countries ineligible to receive the parts.

Results in Brief:

The Air Force does not currently have any internal controls in place to 
prevent the release of spare parts containing sensitive military 
technology that are ordered under blanket orders and that the Air Force 
does not want to release to foreign countries ineligible to receive the 
parts. This has resulted in the inappropriate release of such parts. 
During our work, we identified an instance that occurred in 1997 in 
which a requisition for a C-130 refueling kit, which was to be used on 
U.S. aircraft only, was not reviewed by anyone because there were no 
controls in place to require that it be reviewed before it was shipped 
to a foreign country. When we brought this situation to the attention 
of Air Force Security Assistance Center officials, they said that the 
Air Force does not have clear guidance for identifying parts containing 
sensitive military technology that the Air Force does not want shipped 
to some foreign countries. They acknowledged that releases of similar 
spare parts to foreign countries ineligible to receive them had 
occurred and that such releases were a problem. They also acknowledged 
that as a result of our work the Air Force Audit Agency will review its 
controls for selling military technology to foreign countries. The Air 
Force uses its Security Assistance Management Information System to 
verify in part that countries are eligible to receive classified or 
controlled parts. However, this control could also be used to identify 
for foreign military sales case managers[Footnote 4] review spare parts 
that contain sensitive military technology and that the Air Force does 
not want to release to foreign countries ineligible to receive them.

We recommend that the Secretary of the Air Force direct the Deputy 
Under Secretary of the Air Force, International Affairs, to (1) 
develop, or direct an appropriate source within the Air Force to 
develop, criteria for identifying spare parts containing sensitive 
military technology that should not be released to foreign countries 
and:

(2) establish appropriate edits in the Security Assistance Management 
Information System so that requisitions for spare parts containing 
sensitive military technology that are identified above are referred to 
foreign military sales case managers for review. In commenting on a 
draft of this report, the Department of Defense concurred in principle 
with our recommendations. The department outlined specific corrective 
actions to be taken that respond to our recommendations.

Background:

The transfer of defense items to friendly nations and allies is an 
integral component in both U.S. national security and foreign policy. 
The U.S. government authorizes the sale or transfer of military 
equipment, including spare parts, to foreign countries either through 
government-to-government agreements or through direct sales from U.S. 
manufacturers. The Arms Export Control Act[Footnote 5] and the Foreign 
Assistance Act of 1961,[Footnote 6] as amended, authorize the 
Department of Defense's foreign military sales program.

The Department of State sets the overall policy regarding which 
countries are eligible to participate in the foreign military sales 
program, and the Department of Defense, through the military services, 
enters into foreign military sales agreements with individual 
countries. The Deputy Under Secretary of the Air Force, International 
Affairs, is responsible for the Air Force's foreign military sales 
program. The Air Force Security Assistance Center, which is an activity 
of the Air Force Materiel Command, administers the program. 
Requisitions for spare parts related to significant military equipment 
and major defense equipment are processed as defined orders, which 
cover specific items and quantities and which provide for security 
reviews and item identification. Requisitions can also be processed as 
blanket orders, which define a country's eligibility to requisition 
spare parts. The center uses an automated management information 
system, the Security Assistance Management Information System, to 
ensure that only requisitions for spare parts with appropriate waivers 
are processed under blanket orders.

The Air Force Does Not Control Requisitions of Parts Containing 
Military Technology to Foreign Countries:

The Air Force does not currently have internal controls in place to 
prevent the release of spare parts that contain sensitive military 
technology ordered under blanket orders from being released to foreign 
countries. As a result, the Air Force has released spare parts 
containing sensitive military technology to countries ineligible to 
receive them.

We found that in 1997 a foreign country used a blanket order to 
requisition and obtain a refueling kit used on the C-130 aircraft that 
should not have been released. We were told that, at that time, the 
refueling kit was to be used for U.S. special operations forces 
aircraft only and was not to be released to foreign countries. The 
release occurred because there were no controls in place for the 
requisition to be reviewed prior to release. The refueling kit is 
presently managed by the Air Force's Warner Robins Air Logistics Center 
at Robins Air Force Base, Georgia. Air Force officials told us that the 
Air Force's Office of Special Investigations at that time was asked to 
investigate the release of the refueling kit for the C-130. However, we 
were unable to determine the disposition of that investigation. 
According to the Air Logistics Center, the kit is no longer considered 
sensitive.

While the Security Assistance Management Manual indicates that the 
transfer of technology is to be restricted, it does not define a 
process or establish criteria whereby parts containing sensitive 
technology can be identified. An Air Force Security Assistance Center 
official confirmed that the Air Force does not have clear guidance for 
identifying spare parts containing sensitive military technology that 
the Air Force determines should not be shipped to foreign countries 
ineligible to receive them.

Air Force Security Assistance Center officials acknowledged that 
releasing spare parts containing military technology to some foreign 
countries is a problem resulting from the lack of adequate controls 
over blanket orders and that spare parts containing sensitive military 
technology had been released. The official also said that, as a result 
of our work and the fact that other parts had been released; the Air 
Force Audit Agency may review, within the next year, the Air Force's 
policies for selling military technology to foreign countries.

The Air Force uses its Security Assistance Management Information 
System to help verify that requisitioning countries are eligible to 
requisition and receive spare parts related to significant military 
equipment and major defense equipment and is taking actions to correct 
problems with the system that we recently reported.[Footnote 7] 
However, the Air Force currently does not use the system to control the 
release of spare parts containing sensitive military technology. By 
establishing appropriate restrictions in the system, the Air Force 
could use the system to control the release of spare parts containing 
sensitive military technology that it determines should not be shipped 
to some foreign countries.

Conclusion:

Because the Air Force has no means to identify spare parts containing 
sensitive military technology that it may determine should not be 
released to certain foreign countries and it does not have internal 
controls in place to prevent the release of the parts, such releases 
are occurring. Furthermore, the Air Force does not know the extent of 
those releases. This inadequate control environment places the 
department at risk of having its sensitive military technology not only 
improperly released but also used against national interests.

Recommendations for Executive Action:

We recommend that the Secretary of the Air Force direct the Deputy 
Under Secretary of the Air Force, International Affairs, to (1) 
develop, or direct an appropriate source within the Air Force to 
develop, criteria for identifying spare parts containing sensitive 
military technology that should not be released to foreign countries 
and:

(2) establish appropriate edits in the Security Assistance Management 
Information System so that requisitions for spare parts containing 
sensitive military technology that are identified above are referred to 
foreign military sales case managers for review.

Agency Comments:

In commenting on a draft of this report, the Department of Defense 
concurred in principle with our recommendations. Specifically, the 
department commented that the Secretary of the Air Force will direct an 
appropriate source to (1) develop criteria for identifying spare parts 
containing sensitive technology that should not be released to foreign 
countries and (2) establish appropriate edits in the Security 
Assistance Management Information System so that requisitions for spare 
parts containing sensitive military technology that are identified 
above are referred to foreign military sales case managers for review. 
These actions respond to our recommendations.

The department's comments are enclosed.

Scope and Methodology:

To determine whether the Air Force has controls in place to prevent the 
unintentional release of spare parts containing sensitive military 
technology to foreign countries not eligible to receive them, we held 
discussions with officials from the Office of the Deputy Under 
Secretary of the Air Force, International Affairs; the Air Force 
Materiel Command's Security Assistance Center, Wright-Patterson Air 
Force Base, Ohio; the Air Force's Warner Robins Air Logistics Center, 
Robins Air Force Base, Georgia; and the Air Force Audit Agency. We 
discussed the policies, practices, and procedures for releasing spare 
parts containing military technology to foreign countries. This review 
stems from our prior work[Footnote 8] and was conducted from May 2002 
through July 2003 in accordance with generally accepted government 
auditing standards.

- - - -:

As arranged with your office, unless you publicly announce its contents 
earlier, we plan no further distribution of this report until 30 days 
from the issue date. At that time, we will send copies of this report 
to the Secretary of Defense; the Secretary of the Air Force; the 
Director, Office of Management and Budget; and other interested 
congressional committees. In addition, the report will be available at 
no charge on the GAO Web site at http://www.gao.gov.

Please contact me on (202) 512-8365 if you or your staff have any 
questions concerning this report. Key contributors to this letter were 
Lawson Gist, Jr.; Jennifer Thomas; Arthur James, Jr.; Lou Modliszewski; 
and Jane Hunt.

Sincerely yours,

William M. Solis, Director:

Defense Capabilities and Management:

Signed by William M. Solis: 

Enclosure:

ENCLOSURE:

DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY:

WASHINGTON, DC 20301-2800:

SEP 09 2003:

In reply refer to: 1-03/012158P2:

Mr. William M. Solis, Director Defense Capabilities and Management U.S. 
General Accounting Office:

441 G Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20548:

Dear Mr. Solis:

This is the Department of Defense (DoD) response to the GAO Draft 
report, "Foreign Military Sales: Air Force Does Not Use Controls to 
Prevent Spare Parts Containing Sensitive Military Technology from Being 
Released to Foreign Countries dated July 2003 (GAO Code 350363/GAO-03-
939R).

The Department reviewed the draft report and concurs in principle with 
the recommendation that the Secretary of the Air Force instruct the 
Deputy Under Secretary of the Air Force, International Affairs, to 
require the appropriate officials within the Air Force to take 
corrective measures that ensure adequate controls are in place to 
prevent future unauthorized shipments of unclassified and/or 
uncontrolled spare parts to foreign countries.

Comments addressing the GAO draft report recommendation are included in 
the enclosure.

The Department appreciates the opportunity to comment on the draft 
report. My point of contact on this matter is Ms. Kathy Robinson. She 
maybe contacted by email: kathy robinson@dsca.mil or by telephone at 
(703) 601-4368.

Sincerely,

Tome H. Walters, Jr.

Lieutenant General, USAF
Director: 

Signed by Tome H. Walters, Jr.: 

Attachment As stated:

GAO DRAFT REPORT - DATED JULY 25, 2003 GAO CODE 350363/GAO-03-939R:

"FOREIGN MILITARY SALES: AIR FORCE DOES NOT USE CONTROLS TO PREVENT 
SPARE PARTS CONTAINING SENSITIVE MILITARY TECHNOLOGY FROM BEING 
RELEASED TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES":

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE COMMENTS TO THE RECOMMENDATION:

RECOMMENDATION: The GAO recommended that the Secretary of the Air Force 
direct the Deputy Under Secretary of the Air Force, International 
Affairs, to 1) develop or direct an appropriate source within the Air 
Force to develop criteria for identifying spare parts containing 
sensitive military technology that should not be released to foreign 
countries, and 2) establish appropriate edits in the Security 
Assistance Management Information System (SAMIS) so that requisitions 
for spare parts containing sensitive military technology that are 
identified above are referred to country case managers for review. 
(Page 4/GAO Draft Report):

DOD RESPONSE: Concur. The Secretary of the Air Force (SecAF) will 
direct an appropriate source to (1) develop criteria for identifying 
spare parts containing sensitive technology that should not be released 
to foreign countries and (2) establish appropriate edits in the 
Security Assistance Management Information System (SAMIS) so that 
requisitions for spare parts containing sensitive military technology 
that are identified above are referred to case country managers of 
review.

The SecAF is the proper authority to ensure the right organization can 
accomplish this tasking. We have taken corrective measures to ensure 
adequate controls are in place to ensure only authorized assets are 
released to the FMS customer.	Air Force Security Assistance Center 
(AFSAC) has recently implemented explicit asset release/documentation 
procedures for items identified for review from edits in the SAMIS. 
AFSAC has also established a center-level foreign disclosure office to 
better educate our workforce on appropriate controls, and to review the 
transfer of sensitive items to our foreign customers. The AFMC/DRX 
Technology Working Group, in cooperation with the technology transfer 
disclosure elements within AFMC and AFSAC, could provide advice and 
assist in further developing appropriate measures to ensure only 
authorized assets are released to FMS customers.

Military Department FMS case execution legacy systems (e.g., SAMIS) are 
currently in a "brown-out" state, and Defense Security Cooperation 
Agency (DSCA) approval is required for major changes/improvements while 
the Case Execution Management Information System (CEMIS) is being 
designed. CEMIS requirements were identified by DSCA and the Military 
Departments, and contain numerous requisition validation edits that 
will reject unauthorized orders from further processing, thus 
precluding these types of occurrences in the future. Anticipate CEMIS 
will be ready for initial deployment in FY 07-08 timeframe.

(350363):

FOOTNOTES

[1] Hereafter referred to as blanket order(s).

[2] U.S. General Accounting Office, Foreign Military Sales: Improved 
Air Force Controls Could Prevent Unauthorized Shipments of Classified 
and Controlled Spare Parts to Foreign Countries, GAO-03-664 
(Washington, D.C.: July 29, 2003).

[3] Military technology is technology that would reveal or give insight 
into the design and manufacture of U.S. military systems, which are not 
possessed by or available from sources outside of the United States 
and, if exported, would permit a significant advance in a military 
system of any country.

[4] Foreign military sales case managers at the Air Force Security 
Assistance Center are responsible for monitoring a particular type of 
foreign military sale case, such as a blanket order. 

[5] Public Law 90-629.

[6] Public Law 87-195.

[7] GAO-03-664.

[8] GAO-03-664.