Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities--Update--Notice, GAO-04-1035R, September 10, 2004

[Select for PDF file]

B-294417

September 10, 2004

The Honorable Charles E. Grassley

Chairman

The Honorable Max Baucus

Ranking Minority Member

Committee on Finance

United States Senate



The Honorable W.J. "Billy" Tauzin

Chairman

The Honorable John D. Dingell

Ranking Minority Member

Committee on Energy and Commerce

House of Representatives



The Honorable William M. Thomas

Chairman

The Honorable Charles B. Rangel

Ranking Minority Member

Committee on Ways and Means

House of Representatives



Subject: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities --Update--Notice

Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), entitled "Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing FacilitiesUpdate--Notice" (RIN: 0938-AM46). We received the rule on August 27, 2004. It was published in the Federal Register as a notice on July 30, 2004. 69 Fed. Reg. 45775.

The notice updates the payment rates used under the prospective payment system for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for fiscal year 2005.

Enclosed is our assessment of CMS's compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. Our review indicates that CMS complied with the applicable requirements.

If you have any questions about this report, please contact James W. Vickers, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-8210. The official responsible for GAO evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule is Ms. Marjorie Kanof, Managing Director, Health Care. Ms. Kanof can be reached at (202) 512-7101.

signed

Kathleen E. Wannisky

Managing Associate General Counsel

cc: Ann Stallion

Regulations Coordinator

Department of Health and

Human Services

ENCLOSURE

ANALYSIS UNDER 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(B)(i)-(iv) OF A MAJOR RULE

ISSUED BY THE

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES

ENTITLED

"MEDICARE PROGRAM; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM

AND CONSOLIDATED BILLING FOR

SKILLED NURSING FACILITIESUPDATE--NOTICE "

(RIN: 0938-AM46)



(i) Cost-benefit analysis

CMS estimates that the impact of the standard update will increase payments to SNFs by approximately440 million.

(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 603-605, 607, and 609

The Administrator of CMS has certified that the notice will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1532-1535

The notice does not contain either an intergovernmental or private sector mandate, as defined in title II, of more than110 million in any one year.

(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq .

CMS has found "good cause" to waive the notice and comment procedures found at 5U.S.C. 553. CMS notes that the statute requires annual updates to the SNF prospective payment system rates; the methodologies used to update the rates have been previously subject to public comment and the notice makes no policy changes.

Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520

The notice does not contain an information collection that requires review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Executive Order No. 12866

The notice was reviewed by OMB and found to be an "economically significant" regulatory action under the order.

Executive Order No. 13132 (Federalism)

The final rule will not impact on the rights or responsibilities of state, local, or tribal governments.