Military Personnel: The DOD and Coast Guard Academies Have Taken Steps to Address Incidents of Sexual Harassment and Assault, but Greater Federal Oversight Is Needed

GAO-08-296 January 17, 2008
Highlights Page (PDF)   Full Report (PDF, 64 pages)   Accessible Text   Recommendations (HTML)

Summary

Incidents of sexual harassment and assault contradict the academies' core values to treat all with dignity and respect. Yet, since 2003, each of the Department of Defense (DOD) academies and the Coast Guard Academy has experienced at least one incident. In 2003, Congress directed DOD to establish programs and to submit annual reports, and although not required, the Coast Guard Academy, within the Department of Homeland Security, has taken similar action. GAO was asked to review sexual harassment and assault programs at the academies. This report evaluates (1) the academies' programs to prevent, respond to, and resolve sexual harassment and assault cases; (2) the academies' visibility over sexual harassment and assault incidents; and (3) DOD and Coast Guard oversight of their academies' efforts. GAO analyzed data for program years 2003 through 2006, reviewed requirements, met with service and academy officials, and interviewed randomly selected students at each academy.

The academies have taken steps to prevent, respond to, and resolve sexual harassment and assault incidents. Each DOD academy, for example, has created and staffed the position of Sexual Assault Response Coordinator. Additionally, the DOD and Coast Guard academies have established training programs aimed at preventing and responding to future incidents. The academies have also established alternatives for responding to and resolving reported incidents, depending on whether the incident involves harassment or assault, and in cases of assault, whether the victim wishes to make a restricted report--privately disclosing the incident to select response service providers without triggering an investigation--or an unrestricted report--which involves investigative authorities and the chain of command. A few of the reported sexual assault cases have resulted in formal charges. The academies collect sexual harassment and assault data, but student perceptions in surveys administered in 2006 indicate that incidents may be underreported, suggesting that the academies may not have full visibility over all sexual harassment and assault incidents. For academy program years 2003 through 2006, the DOD academies' military equal opportunity offices reported 32 sexual harassment cases, the Sexual Assault Response Coordinators reported 25 restricted cases of sexual assault, and the military criminal investigators reported 96 unrestricted sexual assault cases. However, estimates from DOD's most recent survey of its academy students, which was administered in March and April 2006, suggest that approximately 200 female and 100 male students may have experienced "unwanted sexual contact" in the previous year alone. Coast Guard Academy data show similar results. While DOD has established an oversight framework for its academies' sexual harassment and assault programs, its oversight has not been integrated and comprehensive, and the Coast Guard headquarters has not established an oversight framework. For example, inconsistencies exist in the way sexual harassment and assault data have been collected and reported because the department has not clearly articulated data reporting requirements. Further, DOD is unable to fully evaluate the academies' programs because it has not established measures to analyze incident data, survey results, and academy programs. Also, DOD has been only minimally addressing congressional interest in academy programs because it has not been conducting a comprehensive and integrated analysis of academy data or programs before forwarding academy reports to Congress. As a result, it has been difficult for DOD and Congress to judge how well the academies are addressing these important issues. It appears that DOD has very recently taken steps to address these concerns. Although the Coast Guard has performed a limited assessment of its academy's sexual harassment activities, it does not report statistics to Congress. In addition, the Coast Guard headquarters has not established guidance with which to oversee and evaluate its academy's efforts. Consequently, the Coast Guard headquarters lacks measures of how well its academy may be addressing incidents of sexual harassment and assault.



Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Implemented" or "Not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director:
Team:
Phone:
Brenda S. Farrell
Government Accountability Office: Defense Capabilities and Management
(202) 512-3604


Matters for Congressional Consideration


Recommendation: Congress may wish to consider requiring the Coast Guard Academy to submit sexual harassment and assault incident and program data for the annual report on Sexual Harassment and Violence at the Military Academies and to participate in surveys and appropriate qualitative methods that produce results that are methodologically comparable to those required of and administered by DOD. Including the Coast Guard Academy in these annual reports and reviews will provide Congress with a more comprehensive integrated and uniform assessment of sexual harassment and assault programs at all of the U.S. military academies.

Status: In process

Comments: When we determine what steps the Congress has taken, we will provide updated information.

Recommendations for Executive Action


Recommendation: To improve visibility and oversight of reported incidents of sexual harassment and assault at the DOD service academies, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness to clearly articulate data reporting requirements to include common terminology.

Agency Affected: Department of Defense

Status: In process

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: To improve visibility and oversight of reported incidents of sexual harassment and assault at the DOD service academies, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness to establish evaluative performance measures that effectively assess academy sexual harassment and assault programs.

Agency Affected: Department of Defense

Status: In process

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: To improve visibility and oversight of reported incidents of sexual harassment and assault at the DOD service academies, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness to provide Congress with a comprehensive integrated assessment of the successes, challenges, and lessons learned from academy sexual harassment and assault programs in future annual academy sexual harassment and violence reports.

Agency Affected: Department of Defense

Status: In process

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: To improve Coast Guard headquarters' oversight of reported incidents of sexual harassment and assault at the Coast Guard Academy, the Commandant of the Coast Guard should establish a management oversight framework for the Coast Guard Academy to include data collection, maintenance, and reporting requirements, management goals, performance measures, and milestones to evaluate progress made toward addressing the incidence of sexual harassment and assault.

Agency Affected: Department of Homeland Security: United States Coast Guard

Status: In process

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.