Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Role of Agribusiness in Our Food Crisis

By George Naylor and Irene Lin, AlterNet. Posted August 7, 2008.


Ethanol critics need to be wary before they jump aboard the anti-ethanol campaigns and let off the hook the real bad actors behind our food crisis.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by George Naylor Irene Lin

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The question of ethanol and its role in the food crisis is one of the most divisive issues raging in the world today. Factory farm and food processing interests cry out for relief from higher grain prices while in the general population, consumers reeling from rising food costs and environmentalists questioning the benefits of corn ethanol are also raising their concerns. One important question remains unasked in the midst of all this: How low do agribusinesses want corn prices to go? If farm programs had set a price floor adjusted for inflation over the last three decades, many more sustainable family farms would be raising livestock rather than destructive factory farms and the idea of turning valuable food into fuel would seem dubious at best. Since we have no real price floor, corn prices could plummet below cost of production that would ironically then rejuvenate ethanol plants and expand factory farm livestock production while wiping out family farmers.

Within National Family Farm Coalition, the subject of ethanol has also provoked division, with some groups wanting an immediate end to all ethanol subsidies and others who believe biofuels offer some promise to our energy crisis. NFFC has an important role to play as one of the few farm organizations willing to question ethanol's benefits for farmers, while making sure our arguments are distinct from anti-ethanol agribusiness interests seeking a return to $2 cheap corn. Agribusiness's other big plan is to dismantle the Conservation Reserve Program, in a futile attempt to have us grow our way out of the food crisis.

In Washington, a major schism has arisen in the big Ag community, with the National Corn Growers Association, American Farm Bureau and pro-ethanol interests battling against their normal partners-in-crime, the Grocery Manufacturers Association and livestock interests like the National Cattlemen Beef Association (NCBA) and the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC). The Bush Administration so far has sided with the pro-ethanol camp, with USDA attributing only 4 percent of food price increases to the increase in corn prices. Meanwhile, food processors and livestock corporations blame high corn prices and ethanol for shrinking their profits and cite a World Bank economist's estimates that 75 percent of the food price increase can be blamed on ethanol. The truth probably lies somewhat in between those numbers. Ethanol critics need to be wary before they jump aboard the anti-ethanol campaigns and let off the hook the real bad actors behind our food crisis.

In May 2008, it was revealed in a DC paper that the Grocery Manufacturers of America (GMA) had hired Glover Park Group, a well-connected lobbying firm, to conduct a massive 6-month PR campaign to discredit ethanol and push for eliminating the Renewable Fuel Standards that call for 36 billion gallons of ethanol by 2022 and other ethanol subsidies. GMA members include Cargill, Coca-Cola, ConAgra and many more. The PR campaign would use anti-poverty, environmental and consumers groups to help "ring the alarm about diverting so much of our food to our fuel supplies." GMA, along with the American Meat Institute, Environmental Working Group and National Chicken Council, is also behind the "Food Before Fuel" lobbying campaign that in July 2008 conducted a press conference in Boston, Massachusetts featuring Representative James McGovern, Co-Chair of the House Hunger Caucus, denouncing ethanol mandates as behind the food crisis impacting so many hungry people in the world. Kraft Food also hired former longtime USDA economist Keith Collins to conduct a study showing 25-35 percent of food price increases were due to ethanol.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: food, agribusiness, farms, ethanol, corn

Irene Lin works for the National Family Farm Coalition and George Naylor is an Iowa corn and soybean farmer who was featured in Michael Pollan's Omnivore's Dilemma.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The key word here is parity.
Posted by: AdamG on Aug 7, 2008 6:02 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Repeat after me:

Farmers need, and want, a fair price not a handout.

Government doesn't make money, it only redistributes it.

If we don't pay a fair price for production, we don't acknowldege that same production.

We must then borrow to absorb that same production.

Call it "economic karma"- screw the producer, screw yourself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More ethanol = less foreign oil
Posted by: Eversol on Aug 8, 2008 10:13 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good for the EPA, standing up to the narrow interests represented by Texas gov Rick Perry. There's so much support nowadays for less-polluting energy sources; we need to ride the tide created by the 2005 legislation that mandates ethanol use in fuel. I've done some work with the Renewable Fuels Association, and I've been able to see that fuels like E85 have ridiculous potential to help us move away from the foreign oil that has a stranglehold on our economy. This is good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tiffany co Jewelry introduce
Posted by: qqNageli on Aug 28, 2008 8:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1887 Tiffany & Co. acquired some of the French crown jewels, an important ... Tiffany & Co Jewelry Store in New York City - Shopping Guide to Tiffany.
Tiffany Bracelet
Tiffany Ring
Tiffany Pendant
The Tiffany jewelry company has risen to iconic status in the United States.Tiffany Jewellery
Tiffany price The company has appeared in songs, music videos and the well-known film

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]