Hey there! andybates is using Twitter.
Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What are you doing? Join today to start receiving andybates's updates.
|
@thedoifter Hey, as long as I’m in there somewhere. And I guess maybe you did a FEW more songs than me. My kids love Creepy Doll, btw. |
@thedoifter I am so jealous! Is the title still, “Jonathan Coulton In Concert, Featuring Andy Bates”? |
@amuse You just have to drop the unimportant stuff. Then you’ll have more time to tweet and blog. |
@pennjillette Okay, that is just completely bizarre. I mean, why would you go work out? |
@kpereira Can you get an autograph? I mean, for my nephew. By the way, his name is also Andy. |
@blondeblogger Yeah, but “Before Present” doesn’t even make sense, because 2008 is the present. |
@blondeblogger How do they date things? Is the year 1970 “38 BP”? |
@oaktowner Even though Repubs had majorities, you still need 60 votes to get past filibuster. If Dems want to block something, they can. |
@zik Dodge, dodge, spin. Keep it up! You have no evidence that the study is not valid, so keep dodging! |
@ctopher Thanks for the link! Interesting reading. |
@zik Your laughter is just another way to dodge the fact that you have no evidence disproving the study. None. Keep spinning though! |
@zik You are the one claiming “it hasn’t even been peer reviewed.” What are you basing that statement on? |
@zik Yes, I understand what peer review is. You have no evidence that it hasn’t been peer reviewed. |
@zik Check MY facts?? Sorry, what were YOUR facts again that shows the study to be invalid? |
@zik I’ll take the word of scientists, with decades of research in psychology, over the word of some random guy with obvious bias. Thanks. |
@zik I’m still waiting for any evidence—anything at all—that says that the study is invalid. You have provided none. Case closed. |
@zik Again, do you think New Scientist just prints articles about any wild theory? |
@zik Oh, you know that is hasn’t been peer-reviewed? |
@zik Face it: You have no evidence that the study is false, except your biased and unsupported claims. Let me know when you have something. |
