825
January 19, 2001
The Honorable Bob Graham
United States Senator
2252 Killearn Center Boulevard
Third Floor
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
Dear Senator Graham:
This is in response to your inquiry on behalf of your
constituents, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx have
asked that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) be amended
to prohibit the "forced" relocation of persons with developmental
disabilities to a more integrated setting. Please excuse our
delay in responding.
The xxxxx letter describes the situation of their son, xxxxx
xxxxx, as follows. xxxxx is an adult with developmental
disabilities who is a long-time resident of the Melmarck
Institute, located in Pennsylvania. County and state officials
want xxxxx to be moved to a smaller home in order to comply with
the ADA mandate for community-based housing for persons with
developmental disabilities, despite his desire to remain in his
current setting, and have denied the request of xxxxxxx family to
apply his Medicaid payments to the cost of his current home.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), through
its regional office in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, has fully and
thoroughly investigated the numerous complaints that xxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx have filed against Pennsylvania agencies in connection
with their son. These complaints have been rejected by HSS on
the basis that the actions of the agencies were consistent with
the ADA's requirement for treatment in the most integrated
setting appropriate to the needs of persons with disabilities.
Attached are two letters sent by HSS to xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in May
1999 and February 2000. It should be noted that the Department
does not serve as a reviewing authority for the administrative
actions or decisions of other federal agencies following their
investigations of complaints about discrimination.
Providing programs and services in the most integrated
setting appropriate to the needs of persons with disabilities is
a core concept of the ADA and the Department's implementing
regulations. The application of this concept to persons with
developmental disabilities was recently upheld by the Supreme
Court in Olmstead v. Zimring (527 U.S. 581, 1999) (holding that
mentally disabled patients may in specified circumstances compel
a state to provide them treatment in a less segregated setting).
The concept of the enhanced integration of persons with
disabilities is a fundamental principle underlying the ADA and
its goal of a fuller life for the persons it is designed to
protect. The amendment to the ADA requested by xxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxx could undermine the efforts by states to provide services
to people with disabilities in their communities.
We hope this information will be helpful to you in
responding to your constituents. Please do not hesitate to
contact the Department if we can be of assistance in other
matters.
Sincerely,
Bill Lann Lee
Assistant Attorney General
Civil Rights Division
Enclosures
Updated 2008-07-25