Exhibit 300 FY2009

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 300 FY2009  

 

 

PART I: SUMMARY INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION  

In Part I, complete Sections A, B, C, and D for all capital assets (IT and non-IT). Complete Sections E and F for IT capital assets.

 

 

 

Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets)  

The following series of questions are to be completed for all investments.

 

 

 

I. A. 1. Date of Submission:   

 

 

 

2007-09-10

 

 

I. A. 2. Agency:   

 

 

 

005

 

 

I. A. 3. Bureau:   

 

 

 

55

 

 

I. A. 4. Name of this Capital Asset:   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

Consumer

 

 

I. A. 5. Unique Project (Investment) Identifier:   

 

For IT investment only, see section 53. For all other, use agency ID system.

 

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

 

 

I. A. 6. What kind of investment will this be in FY2009?   

 

Please NOTE: Investments moving to O&M in FY2009, with Planning/Acquisition activities prior to FY2009 should not select O&M. These investments should indicate their current status.

 

 

Operations and Maintenance

 

 

I. A. 7. What was the first budget year this investment was submitted to OMB?   

 

 

 

FY2001 or earlier

 

 

I. A. 8. Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this, closes in part or in whole, an identified agency performance gap:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

The Consumer investment was initiated to provide the capability to escrow taxes and insurance on Rural Development loans as mandated by Congress in the 1988 amendments to the Housing Act of 1949. Consumer also provides the capability to service and account for the Single Family Housing loan and grant programs from a centralized environment. The four primary objectives of this initiative are: - Compliance with Public Law 100-242. - Dramatically reduce the foreclosure rate for Single Family Housing borrowers. - Achieve significant dollar savings for the American taxpayers through lower delinquency rates, reduced loan losses, and lower operating costs; and. - Amortize borrower payments to bring Rural Development Single Family borrower servicing more inline with the commercial sector. The USDA E-Board reviews this investment annually. The E-Board approved continuation of the Consumer investment in the steady state phase in their most recent review, August 29, 2007. Rural Development purchased a state-of-the-art mortgage origination and servicing system under the Consumer project to originate and service direct Single Family Housing loans and grants and established a new Centralized Servicing Center in St. Louis, Missouri in October, 1996. This system was significantly enhanced to accommodate the unique requirements of the USDA, Single Family Housing loan programs. Implementation of Consumer brought new servicing capabilities to the Agency such as escrowing, forced-placed insurance, and pre-determined amortization schedules. New technologies have been introduced into the Rural Development work environment in order to more fully realize the potential of the Consumer system and improve the efficiency of the servicing functions. These new technologies include document imaging, workflow management, forms generation, automated mail stream processing, voice response units, and power dialing capabilities.

 

 

I. A. 9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 9. a. If "yes," what was the date of this approval?   

 

 

 

2007-08-29

 

 

I. A. 10. Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 11. Contact information of Project Manager  

 

 

Name   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

Daniel Hall

 

 

Phone Number   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

314-335-8628

 

 

E-mail   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

Daniel.Hall2@stl.usda.gov

 

 

I. A. 11. a. What is the current FAC-P/PM certification level of the project/program manager?   

 

 

 

TBD

 

 

I. A. 12. Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project?   

 

 

 

no

 

 

I. A. 12. a. Will this investment include electronic assets (including computers)?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 12. b. Is this investment for new construction or major retrofit of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to non-IT assets only)   

 

 

 

no

 

 

I. A. 12. b. 1. If "yes," is an ESPC or UESC being used to help fund this investment?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. A. 12. b. 2. If "yes," will this investment meet sustainable design principles?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. A. 12. b. 3. If "yes," is it designed to be 30% more energy efficient than relevant code?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. A. 13. Does this investment directly support one of the PMA initiatives?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 13. a. If "yes," check all that apply:   

 

 

 

Financial Performance

Expanded E-Government

 

 

I. A. 13. b. Briefly and specifically describe for each selected how this asset directly supports the identified initiative(s)? (e.g. If E-Gov is selected, is it an approved shared service provider or the managing partner?)   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

Advances Financial Performance by providing more accurate and timely daata to support operating , budget, and policy decisions. Alignment with Expansion E-Government demonstrated with eforms integrated with Business Gateway: web interface complying with DR3430-001; users utilizing AgLearn for security awareness training; loan program information posted on Gov Loans Gateway; and grant applications available on Grants.gove and electronically transported to USDA.

 

 

I. A. 14. Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)? (For more information about the PART, visit www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part.)   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 14. a. If "yes," does this investment address a weakness found during the PART review?   

 

 

 

no

 

 

I. A. 14. b. If "yes," what is the name of the PARTed Program?   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

Single Family Housing Direct Loans

 

 

I. A. 14. c. If "yes," what PART rating did it receive?   

 

 

 

Adequate

 

 

I. A. 15. Is this investment for information technology?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 16. What is the level of the IT Project? (per CIO Council PM Guidance)   

 

Level 1 - Projects with low-to-moderate complexity and risk. Example: Bureau-level project such as a stand-alone information system that has low- to-moderate complexity and risk.
Level 2 - Projects with high complexity and/or risk which are critical to the mission of the organization. Examples: Projects that are part of a portfolio of projects/systems that impact each other and/or impact mission activities. Department-wide projects that impact cross-organizational missions, such as an agency-wide system integration that includes large scale Enterprise Resource Planning (e.g., the DoD Business Mgmt Modernization Program).
Level 3 - Projects that have high complexity, and/or risk, and have government-wide impact. Examples: Government-wide initiative (E-GOV, President's Management Agenda). High interest projects with Congress, GAO, OMB, or the general public. Cross-cutting initiative (Homeland Security).

 

 

Level 3

 

 

I. A. 17. What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per CIO Council’s PM Guidance):   

 

(1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment;(2) Project manager qualification is under review for this investment;(3) Project manager assigned to investment, but does not meet requirements;(4) Project manager assigned but qualification status review has not yet started;(5) No Project manager has yet been assigned to this investment

 

 

(2) Project manager qualification is under review for this investment

 

 

I. A. 18. Is this investment identified as "high risk" on the Q4-FY 2007 agency high risk report (per OMB Memorandum M-05-23)?   

 

 

 

no

 

 

I. A. 19. Is this a financial management system?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 19. a. If "yes," does this investment address a FFMIA compliance area?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 19. a. 1. If "yes," which compliance area   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

Core Financial Management

 

 

I. A. 19. a. 2. If "no," what does it address?   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. A. 19. b. If "yes," please identify the system name(s) and system acronym(s) as reported in the most recent financial systems inventory update required by Circular A-11 section 52   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

Consumer

 

 

I. A. 20. What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2009 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%)  

 

 

I. A. 20. a. Hardware   

 

 

 

0

 

 

I. A. 20. b. Software   

 

 

 

0

 

 

I. A. 20. c. Services   

 

 

 

100

 

 

I. A. 20. d. Other   

 

 

 

0

 

 

I. A. 21. If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities?   

 

 

 

n/a

 

 

I. A. 22. Contact information of individual responsible for privacy related questions:  

 

 

I. A. 22. a. Name   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

Brenda Dinges

 

 

I. A. 22. b. Phone Number   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

314-335-8829

 

 

I. A. 22. c. Title   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

RD Information Systems Security Staff Program Manager, Rural Development

 

 

I. A. 22. d. E-mail   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

brenda.dinges@stl.usda.gov

 

 

I. A. 23. Are the records produced by this investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 24. Does this investment directly support one of the GAO High Risk Areas?   

 

Question 24 must be answered by all Investments:

 

 

no

 

 

Section B: Summary of Spending (All Capital Assets)  

 

 

I. B. 1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated "Government FTE Cost," and should be excluded from the amounts shown for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." The "TOTAL" estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report.   

 

Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing and partner agencies).
Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented.

 

 

 

PY-1 Spending Prior to 2007

PY 2007

CY 2008

BY 2009

BY+1 2010

BY+2 2011

BY+3 2012

BY+4 2013 and Beyond

Total

Planning

0

0

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition

34.980

0

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

Subtotal Planning & Acquisition

34.980

0

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

Operations & Maintenance

28.533

5.570

5.505

2.448

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

63.513

5.570

5.505

2.448

 

 

 

 

 

Government FTE Costs

34.150

2.142

2.205

1.890

 

 

 

 

 

Number of FTE represented by cost

79

21

21

17.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. B. 2. Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's?   

 

 

 

no

 

 

I. B. 2. a. If "yes," How many and in what year?   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. B. 3. If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2008 President's budget request, briefly explain those changes.   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

Section C: Acquisition/Contract Strategy (All Capital Assets)  

 

 

I. C. 1. Complete the table for all (including all non-Federal) contracts and/or task orders currently in place or planned for this investment. Total Value should include all option years for each contract. Contracts and/or task orders completed do not need to be included.   

 

SIS - Share in Services contract; ESPC - Energy savings performance contract ; UESC - Utility energy efficiency service contract; EUL - Enhanced use lease contract; N/A - no alternative financing used.
(Character Limitations: Contract or Task Order Number - 250 Characters; Type of Contract/Task Order - 250 Characters; Name of CO - 250 Characters; CO Contact Information - 250 Characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. C. 2. If earned value is not required or will not be a contract requirement for any of the contracts or task orders above, explain why:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. C. 3. Do the contracts ensure Section 508 compliance?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. C. 3. a. Explain Why:   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. C. 4. Is there an acquisition plan which has been approved in accordance with agency requirements?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. C. 4. a. If "yes," what is the date?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. C. 4. b. If "no," will an acquisition plan be developed?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. C. 4. b. 1. If "no," briefly explain why:   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

Section D: Performance Information (All Capital Assets)  

In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300, performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the agency’s mission and strategic goals, and performance measures (indicators) must be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency's strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill. They are the internal and external performance benefits this investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved that do not have a quantitative measure.

 

 

 

I. D. 1. Table 1. Performance Information Table   

 

In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300, performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the agency’s mission and strategic goals, and performance measures (indicators) must be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency's strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill. They are the internal and external performance benefits this investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved that do not have a quantitative measure.

Agencies must use the following table to report performance goals and measures for the major investment and use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding "Measurement Area" and "Measurement Grouping" identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for each of the four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at www.egov.gov. The table can be extended to include performance measures for years beyond FY 2009.

 

 

 

Strategic Goal(s) Supported

Measurement Area

Measurement Grouping

Measurement Indicator

Baseline

Target

Actual Results

2005

Goal #3 Support Increased Economic Opportunities and Improved Quality of Life in Rural America

Technology

Financial Management

% of time Consumers is available to end-users

98%

99% availability

99% Achieved as of 7/01/2005.

2005

Goal #3

Processes and Activities

Homeownership Promotion

# of customer complaints received at the Centralized Help Desk each month related to DLOS

150

Reduce to 100

Averaging under 100 each month as of 7/1/05.

2005

Goal #3

Processes and Activities

Homeownership Promotion

# of potential security risks identified and mitigated

13%

Mitigate 14%

13% as of 07/01/2005

2005

Goal #3

Customer Results

Information Management

% of customers indicating overall satisfaction with DLOS

70%

80%

As of 7/1/05, customer satisfaction is averaging about 85%

2005

Goal #3

Mission and Business Results

Financial Management

% delinquencies in SFH loan program

15%

14%

14.05% as of 8-1-05

2006

Goal #3

Technology

Information Management

% of time Consumer is available to end-users

99%

99% availability

As of Sept. 30, 2006, Consumer available 100% of time.

2006

Goal #3

Processes and Activities

Financial Sector Oversight

# of customer complaints received at the Centralized Help Desk each month related to DLOS

100

Maintain at 100.

As of Sept. 30, 2006, Consumer had approximately 100 complaints.

2006

Goal #3

Processes and Activities

Management Improvement

# of potential security risks identified and mitigated

14%

Mitigate 14%

As of Sept. 30, 2006. Consurmer maintained 14% risk.

2006

Goal #3

Customer Results

Management Improvement

% if customers indicating overall satisfaction with DLOS

80%

Maintain 80%

As of Sept. 30, 2006, there is a 73.3 % customer satisfaction rating.

2006

Goal #3

Mission and Business Results

Financial Management

% delinquencies in SFH loan program

14%

14%

As of Sept. 30, 2006, risk has been maintained at 14%.

2007

Goal #3

Technology

Information Management

% of time Consumer is available to end-users

99%

99%

As of June 30,2007, Consumer available 100%.

2007

Goal #3

Processes and Activities

Financial Management

# of customer complaints received

150

10% reduction

As of June 30, 2007 Consumer has received approximately 40 complaints.

2007

Goal #3

Processes and Activities

Homeownership Promotion

# of potential risks identified and mitigated

14% in FY06.

Maintain at 14%

As of June 30 2007, the delinquency rate is 12.38%.

2007

Goal #3

Customer Results

Information Management

% of customers indicating satifaction with DLOS

80% in FY06.

85% customer satisfaction rating

As of Junel 30, 2007, Consumer has a 73.3 % customer satisfaction rating.

2007

Goal #3

Mission and Business Results

Financial Management

% of delinquencies in SFH loan Program

14% in FY06.

Decrease to13%

As of June 30, 2007, the delinquency rate is 12.38%.ned at 14%.

2008

Goal #3

Technology

Information Management

% of time Consumer available to end-user.

99% in FY07.

Maintain at 99%.

Not applicable until FY08

2008

Goal #3

Processes and Activities

Management Improvement

# of customer complaints received

135 in FY07.

10% reduction

Not applicable until FY08.

2008

Goal #3

Processes and Activities

Management Improvement

# of potential risks identified and mitigated.

14% in FY07.

Reduce to 12%

Not applicable until FY08.

2008

Goal #3

Customer Results

Management Improvement

% of customers indicating satisfaction with DLOS.

85% in FY07

Increase to 88%.

Not Applicable until FY08.

2008

Goal #3

Mission and Business Results

Financial Management

% of delinquencies in SFH Program

14% in FY07.

Maintain 14%

Not Applicable until FY08.

2009

Goal #3

Technology

Information Management

% of time Consumer available to end user

99% in FY08

Maintain at 99%

Not Applicable until FY09

2009

Goal #3

Processes and Activities

Corrective Action

# of customer complaints received

122 in FY08.

5% reduction

Not Applicable until FY09

2009

Goal #3

Customer Results

Risk

# of potential risks identified and mitigated.

13% in FY08.

Maintain at 13%.

Not Applicable until FY09

2009

Goal #3

Technology

Corrective Action

% of customers indicating satisfaction with DLOS.

85% in FY08

Increase to 90%

Not Applicable until FY09

2009

Goal #3

Processes and Activities

Response Time

% of delinquencies in SFH Program

14% in FY08.

Maintain 14%

Not Applicable until FY09

2010

Goal #3

Technology

Information Management

% of time Consumer available to end-user.

 

Maintain at 99%

Not Applicable until FY10

2010

Goal #3

Processes and Activities

Corrective Action

# of customer complaints received.

 

5% reduction

Not Applicable unitl FY10

2010

Goal #3

Customer Results

Risk

# of potential risks identified and mitigated.

 

Maintain at 13%

Not Applicable until FY10

2010

Goal #3

Technology

Information Management

% of customers indicating satisfaction with Consumer.

 

Increase to 92%

Not Applicable until FY10

2010

Gaol #3

Processes and Activities

Response Time

% of delinquiencies in SFH Program.

 

Maintain 14%

Not Applicable until FY10

 

 

Section E: Security and Privacy (IT Capital Assets only)  

In order to successfully address this area of the business case, each question below must be answered at the system/application level, not at a program or agency level. Systems supporting this investment on the planning and operational systems security tables should match the systems on the privacy table below. Systems on the Operational Security Table must be included on your agency FISMA system inventory and should be easily referenced in the inventory (i.e., should use the same name or identifier).

For existing Mixed-Life Cycle investments where enhancement, development, and/or modernization is planned, include the investment in both the “Systems in Planning” table (Table 3) and the “Operational Systems” table (Table 4). Systems which are already operational, but have enhancement, development, and/or modernization activity, should be included in both Table 3 and Table 4. Table 3 should reflect the planned date for the system changes to be complete and operational, and the planned date for the associated C&A update. Table 4 should reflect the current status of the requirements listed. In this context, information contained within Table 3 should characterize what updates to testing and documentation will occur before implementing the enhancements; and Table 4 should characterize the current state of the materials associated with the existing system.

All systems listed in the two security tables should be identified in the privacy table. The list of systems in the “Name of System” column of the privacy table (Table 8) should match the systems listed in columns titled “Name of System” in the security tables (Tables 3 and 4). For the Privacy table, it is possible that there may not be a one-to-one ratio between the list of systems and the related privacy documents. For example, one PIA could cover multiple systems. If this is the case, a working link to the PIA may be listed in column (d) of the privacy table more than once (for each system covered by the PIA).

 

 

 

I. E. 1. Have the IT security costs for the system(s) been identified and integrated into the overall costs of the investment?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 1. a. If "yes," provide the "Percentage IT Security" for the budget year:   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 2. Is identifying and assessing security and privacy risks a part of the overall risk management effort for each system supporting or part of this investment?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 3. Systems in Planning and Undergoing Enhancement(s) – Security Table:   

 

The questions asking whether there is a PIA which covers the system and whether a SORN is required for the system are discrete from the narrative fields. The narrative column provides an opportunity for free text explanation why a working link is not provided. For example, a SORN may be required for the system, but the system is not yet operational. In this circumstance, answer “yes” for column (e) and in the narrative in column (f), explain that because the system is not operational the SORN is not yet required to be published.

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 4. Operational Systems - Security:   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 5. Have any weaknesses related to any of the systems part of or supporting this investment been identified by the agency or IG?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 5. a. If "yes," have those weaknesses been incorporated into the agency's plan of action and milestone process?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 6. Indicate whether an increase in IT security funding is requested to remediate IT security weaknesses?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 6. a. If "yes," specify the amount, provide a general description of the weakness, and explain how the funding request will remediate the weakness.   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 7. How are contractor security procedures monitored, verified, and validated by the agency for the contractor systems above?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 8. Planning & Operational Systems - Privacy Table:   

 

Details for Text Options:
Column (d): If yes to (c), provide the link(s) to the publicly posted PIA(s) with which this system is associated. If no to (c), provide an explanation why the PIA has not been publicly posted or why the PIA has not been conducted.

Column (f): If yes to (e), provide the link(s) to where the current and up to date SORN(s) is published in the federal register. If no to (e), provide an explanation why the SORN has not been published or why there isn’t a current and up to date SORN.

Note: Links must be provided to specific documents not general privacy websites.

 

 

 

 

 

Section F: Enterprise Architecture (EA) (IT Capital Assets only)  

In order to successfully address this area of the business case and capital asset plan you must ensure the investment is included in the agency's EA and Capital Planning and Invesment Control (CPIC) process, and is mapped to and supports the FEA. You must also ensure the business case demonstrates the relationship between the investment and the business, performance, data, services, application, and technology layers of the agency's EA.

 

 

 

I. F. 1. Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. F. 1. a. If "no," please explain why?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. F. 2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?   

 

 

 

no

 

 

I. F. 2. a. If "yes," provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment.   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. F. 2. b. If "no," please explain why?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

There is no transition activity underway at this time.

 

 

I. F. 3. Is this investment identified in a completed (contains a target architecture) and approved segment architecture?   

 

 

 

no

 

 

I. F. 3. a. If "yes," provide the name of the segment architecture.   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. F. 4. Service Component Reference Model (SRM) Table :   

 

Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.egov.gov.

a. Use existing SRM Components or identify as “NEW”. A “NEW” component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM.
b. A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission.
c. ‘Internal’ reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. ‘External’ reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government.
d. Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount transferred to another agency to pay for the service. The percentages in this column can, but are not required to, add up to 100%.

 

 

 

Agency Component Description

FEA SRM Service Type

FEA SRM Component (a)

Service Component Reused - Component Name (b)

Service Component Reused - UPI (b)

Internal or External Reuse? (c)

BY Funding Percentage (d)

Customer Services

Online Help for Consumer

Customer Initiated Assistance

Online Help

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Customer Services

Decision Engine evaluates credit history of customers from third party credit agencies

Customer Relationship Management

Customer Analytics

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Customer Services

Consumer allows for the creation and maintenance of loans

Customer Relationship Management

Product Management

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Customer Services

Consumer retains customer informationorder to fund loans

Customer Relationship Management

Customer / Account Management

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Process Automation Services

Consumer captures all business transactions against the loans for monitoring and servicing puposes of loans

Tracking and Workflow

Process Tracking

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Process Automation Services

Consumer is designed for managing the RD SFH loan portfolio

Investment Management

Product Management

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Business Analytical Services

Loan origination component will have a scorecard for analyzing applicant?s credit history against previous borrower?s history

Business Intelligence

Balanced Scorecard

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Business Analytical Services

Consumer currently allows ad hoc reporting through Crystal Reports and Hypernion applications

Reporting

Ad Hoc

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Business Analytical Services

Consumer has over 100 canned reports

Data Management

Standardized / Canned

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Back Office Services

Consumer interfaces with PLAS, Data Warehouse, Department of Treasury, Housing and Urban Development, Electronic Funds Transfer and PFCS

Financial Management

Data Exchange

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Back Office Services

Consumer captures all business transactions against the loans for servicing purposes of loans. This activity is also kept for auditing purposes.

Financial Management

Auditing

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Back Office Services

Consumers captures all business transactions against the loans for monitoring and tracking purposes of loans.

Financial Management

Activity-Based Management

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Back Office Services

Many of the Consumer canned reports are considered financial reports by the user financial management user community.

Financial Management

Portfolio Management

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Back Office Services

Software development is being executed in order for Consumer to be developed and maintained.

Financial Management

Software Development

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Support Services

Consumer maintains security information about users and validates them upon entry.

Security Management

Identification and Authentication

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Support Services

Both the Consumer internal and external websites resided within the St. Louis web farm, which perform intrusion detection.

Security Management

Intrusion Detection

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Support Services

Consumer supports the confirmation of authority to enter their application.

Security Management

Intrusion Detection

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Support Services

Both the Consumer internal and external websits support the granting of abilities to users or groups of users for their respective application.

Security Management

Intrusion Detection

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Support Services

Consumer internal website supports the granting of abilities to users or groups of users for their respective application.

Security Management

System Resource Monitoring

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Support Services

Consumer supports the design and generation of electronic or physical forms for use within the business cycle.

Forms Management

Forms Creation

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Support Services

Consumers supports the maintenance of electronic or physical forms and their respective elements and fields.

Forms Management

Forms Modification

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

Support Services

Numerous Consumer components support retrieval of records that satisfy specific query selection criteria.

Search

Query

 

005-55-01-01-01-1020-00

No Reuse

0

 

 

I. F. 5. Table 1. Technical Reference Model (TRM) Table:   

 

To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment.

a. Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications
b. In the Service Specification field, agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate.

 

 

 

FEA TRM Service Area

FEA TRM Service Category

FEA TRM Service Standard

Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name)

Online Help

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Web Browser

Internet Explorer

Customer / Account Management

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Collaboration / Communications

Electronic Mail (E-mail)

Intrusion Detection

Service Access and Delivery

Delivery Channels

Internet

Web Service

Balanced Scorecard

Service Access and Delivery

Service Requirements

Legislative / Compliance

Section 508

System Resource Monitoring

Service Access and Delivery

Service Requirements

Legislative / Compliance

Security

System Resource Monitoring

Service Access and Delivery

Service Requirements

Hosting

Internal (within agency)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Network Devices / Standards

Domain Name System (DNS)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Network Devices / Standards

Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Service Transport

Transport Control Protocol (TCP)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Service Transport

Internet Protocol (IP)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Service Transport

Hyper Text Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Service Transport

File Transfer Protocol (FTP)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Service Transport

IP Security (IPSEC)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Support Platforms

Platform Independent

Java 2 Platform Enterprise Edition (J2EE)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Database / Storage

Database

Oracle

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Database / Storage

Storage

Storage Area Network (SAR)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Web Servers

Internet Information Server

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Web Servers

Apache

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Application Servers

Internet Information Server

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Servers / Computers

Mainframe

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Hard Disk Drive

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Microprocessor

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Peripherals

Printer

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Wide Area Network (WAN)

Frame Relay

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Wide Area Network (WAN)

Ethernet

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Network Devices / Standards

Hub

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Network Devices / Standards

Switch

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Network Devices / Standards

Router

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Network Devices / Standards

Network Interface Card (NIC)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Network Devices / Standards

Transcievers

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Network Devices / Standards

Gateway

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Network Devices / Standards

T1/T3

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Network Devices / Standards

Firewall

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Integrated Development Environment

Java 2 Platform Enterprise Edition (J2EE)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Integrated Development Environment

Visual Studio

Software Development

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Software Configuration Management

Version Management

Software Development

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Software Configuration Management

Change Management

Software Development

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Software Configuration Management

Requirements Management and Traceability

Software Development

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Functional Testing

Software Development

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Osaomy Testing (505 Testing)

Software Development

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Performance Profiling

Software Development

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Load/Stress/Volume Testing

Software Development

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Security and Access Control Testing

Software Development

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Reliability Testing

Software Development

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Configuration Testing

Software Development

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Installation Testing

Intrusion Detection

Component Framework

Security

Certificates / Digital Signatures

Digital Certificate Authentication

Intrusion Detection

Component Framework

Security

Certificates / Digital Signatures

FIPS 186

Intrusion Detection

Component Framework

Security

Certificates / Digital Signatures

Secure Sockets Layer (SSL)

Intrusion Detection

Component Framework

Security

Supporting Security Services

Transport Layer Security (TLS)

Intrusion Detection

Component Framework

Security

Supporting Security Services

Secure Shell (SSH)

Data Exchange

Component Framework

Data Interchange

Data Exchange

XMI

Data Exchange

Component Framework

Data Interchange

Data Exchange

XQuery

Data Exchange

Component Framework

Data Interchange

Data Exchange

XML for Analysis

Forms Creation

Component Framework

Presentation / Interface

Static Display

Hyper Text Markup Language (HTML)

Forms Creation

Component Framework

Presentation / Interface

Dynamic Server-Side Display

Java Server Pages (JSP)

Forms Creation

Component Framework

Presentation / Interface

Dynamic Server-Side Display

Active Server Pages (ASP)

Forms Creation

Component Framework

Presentation / Interface

Content Rendering

Cascading Style Sheets (CSS)

Customer Analytics

Component Framework

Business Logic

Platform Independent

JavaScript

Customer Analytics

Component Framework

Business Logic

Platform Independent

Java Servlet (JSR 53)

Query

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

Java Database Connectivity (JDBC)

Query

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

Open Database Connectivity (ODBC)

Query

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

Data Access Objects (DAO)

Query

Component Framework

Data Management

Reporting and Analysis

On-line Analytical Processing (OLAP)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Interface and Integration

Integration

Middleware

Remote Procedure Call

System Resource Monitoring

Service Interface and Integration

Integration

Database

Databass Access PL/SQL

System Resource Monitoring

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Format / Classification

XML Schema

System Resource Monitoring

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Format / Classification

XML Linking Language (XLINK)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Types / Validation

Document Type Definition (DTD)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Types / Validation

XMLSchema

System Resource Monitoring

Service Interface and Integration

Interface

Service Discovery

Universal Descriton Discovery and Integration (UDDI)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Interface and Integration

Interface

Service Description / Interface

Web Services Description Language (WSDL)

System Resource Monitoring

Service Interface and Integration

Interface

Service Description / Interface

Application Program Interface (API) / Protocol

 

 

I. F. 6. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. F. 6. a. If "yes," please describe.   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

Rural Development has incorporated into Consumer a number of loan servicing functions which provide support to non-USDA agencies. These include a web-site portal used for servicing properties under jurisdiction of the Department of Veteran Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, the Treasury Offset Program, which interfaces with the Department of Treasury as well as Farm Services Agency. The system wil also leverage our partner agency developed data warehouse providing Internet access to data that will increase accessibility and management of the information and reduce paper records.

 

 

PART II: PLANNING, ACQUISITION AND PERFORMANCE INFORMATION  

Part II should be completed only for investments identified as “Planning” or “Full-Acquisition,” or “Mixed Life-Cycle” investments in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above

 

 

 

Section A: Alternatives Analysis (All Capital Assets)  

In selecting the best capital asset, you should identify and consider at least three viable alternatives, in addition to the current baseline, i.e., the status quo. Use OMB Circular A-94 for all investments and the Clinger Cohen Act of 1996 for IT investments to determine the criteria you should use in your Benefit/Cost Analysis.

 

 

 

II. A. 1. Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this project?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. A. 1. a. If "yes," provide the date the analysis was completed?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. A. 1. b. If "no," what is the anticipated date this analysis will be completed?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. A. 1. c. If no analysis is planned, please briefly explain why:   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

II. A. 2. Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:   

 

(Character Limitations: Alternative Analyzed - 250 characters; Description of Alternative - 500 Characters)

 

 

 

 

 

II. A. 3. Which alternative was selected by the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee and why was it chosen?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

II. A. 4. What specific qualitative benefits will be realized?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

II. A. 5. Will the selected alternative replace a legacy system in-part or in-whole?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. A. 5. a. If “yes,” are the migration costs associated with the migration to the selected alternative included in this investment, the legacy investment, or in a separate migration investment?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. A. 5. b. Table 1. If "yes," please provide the following information:   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Section B: Risk Management (All Capital Assets)  

You should have performed a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of this investment's life-cycle, developed a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment's life-cycle.

 

 

 

II. B. 1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. B. 1. a. If "yes," what is the date of the plan?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. B. 1. b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. B. 1. c. If "yes," describe any significant changes:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

II. B. 2. If there currently is no plan, will a plan be developed?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. B. 2. a. If "yes," what is the planned completion date?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. B. 2. b. If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

II. B. 3. Briefly describe how investment risks are reflected in the life cycle cost estimate and investment schedule:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

Section C: Cost and Schedule Performance (All Capital Assets)  

EVM is required only on DME portions of investments. For mixed lifecycle investments, O&M milestones should still be included in the table (Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline). This table should accurately reflect the milestones in the initial baseline, as well as milestones in the current baseline.

 

 

 

II. C. 1. Does the earned value management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard - 748?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. C. 2. Is the CV or SV greater than 10%?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. C. 2. a. If "yes," was it the CV or SV or both ?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. C. 2. b. If "yes," explain the causes of the variance:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

II. C. 2. c. If "yes," describe the corrective actions:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

II. C. 3. Has the investment re-baselined during the past fiscal year?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. C. 3. a. If "yes," when was it approved by the agency head?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. C. 4. Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline   

 

Complete the following table to compare actual performance against the current performance baseline and to the initial performance baseline. In the Current Baseline section, for all milestones listed, you should provide both the baseline and actual completion dates (e.g., “03/23/2003”/ “04/28/2004”) and the baseline and actual total costs (in $ Millions). In the event that a milestone is not found in both the initial and current baseline, leave the associated cells blank. Note that the ‘Description of Milestone’ and ‘Percent Complete’ fields are required. Indicate ‘0’ for any milestone no longer active. (Character Limitations: Description of Milestone - 500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

PART III: FOR "OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE" INVESTMENTS ONLY (STEADY-STATE)  

Part III should be completed only for investments identified as "Operation and Maintenance" (Steady State) in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above.

 

 

 

Section A: Risk Management (All Capital Assets)  

You should have performed a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of this investment’s life-cycle, developed a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment’s life-cycle.

 

 

 

III. A. 1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

III. A. 1. a. If "yes," what is the date of the plan?   

 

 

 

2007-08-06

 

 

III. A. 1. b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

III. A. 1. c. If "yes," describe any significant changes:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

In light of recent security events, privacy risks were re-assessed and new privacy related risk management strategies developed. In addition, asscociated costs have been included for each risk with the appropriate guidance.

 

 

III. A. 2. If there currently is no plan, will a plan be developed?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

III. A. 2. a. If "yes," what is the planned completion date?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

III. A. 2. b. If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

Section B: Cost and Schedule Performance (All Capital Assets)  

 

 

III. B. 1. Was operational analysis conducted?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

III. B. 1. a. If "yes," provide the date the analysis was completed.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

III. B. 1. b. If "yes," what were the results?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

III. B. 1. c. If "no," please explain why it was not conducted and if there are any plans to conduct operational analysis in the future:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

III. B. 2. Complete the following table to compare actual cost performance against the planned cost performance baseline. Milestones reported may include specific individual scheduled preventative and predictable corrective maintenance activities, or may be the total of planned annual operation and maintenance efforts).  

(Character Limitations: Description of Milestone - 250 Characters)

 

 

 

III. B. 2. a. What costs are included in the reported Cost/Schedule Performance information (Government Only/Contractor Only/Both)?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

III. B. 2. b. Comparison of Planned and Actual Cost   

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART IV: Planning For "Multi-Agency Collaboration" ONLY  

Part IV should be completed only for investments identified as an E-Gov initiative, an Line of Business (LOB) Initiative, or a Multi-Agency Collaboration effort., selected the “Multi-Agency Collaboration” choice in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above. Investments identified as “Multi-Agency Collaboration” will complete only Parts I and IV of the exhibit 300.

 

 

 

Section A: Multi-Agency Collaboration Oversight (All Capital Assets)  

Multi-agency Collaborations, such as E-Gov and LOB initiatives, should develop a joint exhibit 300.

 

 

 

IV. A. 1. Stakeholder Table   

 

As a joint exhibit 300, please identify the agency stakeholders. Provide the partner agency and partner agency approval date for this joint exhibit 300.

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 2. Partner Capital Assets within this Investment   

 

Provide the partnering strategies you are implementing with the participating agencies and organizations. Identify all partner agency capital assets supporting the common solution (section 300.7); Managing Partner capital assets should also be included in this joint exhibit 300. These capital assets should be included in the Summary of Spending table of Part I, Section B. All partner agency migration investments (section 53.4) should also be included in this table. Funding contributions/fee-for-service transfers should not be included in this table. (Partner Agency Asset UPIs should also appear on the Partner Agency's exhibit 53)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 3. Partner Funding Strategies ($millions)   

 

For jointly funded initiative activities, provide in the “Partner Funding Strategies Table”: the name(s) of partner agencies; the UPI of the partner agency investments; and the partner agency contributions for CY and BY. Please indicate partner contribution amounts (in-kind contributions should also be included in this amount) and fee-for-service amounts. (Partner Agency Asset UPIs should also appear on the Partner Agency's exhibit 53. For non-IT fee-for-service amounts the Partner exhibit 53 UPI can be left blank) (IT migration investments should not be included in this table)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 4. Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this project?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 4. a. If "yes," provide the date the analysis was completed?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 4. b. If "no," what is the anticipated date this analysis will be completed?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 4. c. If no analysis is planned, please briefly explain why:   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 5. Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 6. Which alternative was selected by the Initiative Governance process and why was it chosen?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 7. What specific qualitative benefits will be realized?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 8. Table 1. Federal Quantitative Benefits ($millions):   

 

What specific quantitative benefits will be realized (using current dollars)
Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 9. Will the selected alternative replace a legacy system in-part or in-whole?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 9. a. If "yes," are the migration costs associated with the migration to the selected alternative included in this investment, the legacy investment, or in a separate migration investment?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 9. b. Table 1. If "yes," please provide the following information:   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Section B: Risk Management (All Capital Assets)  

You should have performed a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of this investment’s life-cycle, developed a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment’s life-cycle.

 

 

 

IV. B. 1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. B. 1. a. If "yes," what is the date of the plan?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. B. 1. b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. B. 1. c. If "yes," describe any significant changes:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. B. 2. If there currently is no plan, will a plan be developed?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. B. 2. a. If "yes," what is the planned completion date?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. B. 2. b. If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

Section C: Cost and Schedule Performance (All Capital Assets)  

You should also periodically be measuring the performance of operational assets against the baseline established during the planning or full acquisition phase (i.e., operational analysis), and be properly operating and maintaining the asset to maximize its useful life. Operational analysis may identify the need to redesign or modify an asset by identifying previously undetected faults in design, construction, or installation/integration, highlighting whether actual operation and maintenance costs vary significantly from budgeted costs, or documenting that the asset is failing to meet program requirements.

EVM is required only on DME portions of investments. For mixed lifecycle investments, O&M milestones should still be included in the table (Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline). This table should accurately reflect the milestones in the initial baseline, as well as milestones in the current baseline.

Answer the following questions about the status of this investment. Include information on all appropriate capital assets supporting this investment except for assets in which the performance information is reported in a separate exhibit 300.

 

 

 

IV. C. 1. Are you using EVM to manage this investment?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 1. a. If "yes," does the earned value management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard - 748?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 1. b. If "no," explain plans to implement EVM:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 1. c. If "N/A," please provide date operational analysis was conducted and a brief summary of the results?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 2. Is the CV% or SV% greater than ± 10%? (CV% = CV/EV x 100; SV% = SV/PV x 100)   

 

NOT applicable for capital assets with ONLY O&M.

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 2. a. If "yes," was it the CV or SV or both ?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 2. b. If "yes," explain the causes of the variance:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 2. c. If "yes," describe the corrective actions:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 3. Has the investment re-baselined during the past fiscal year?   

 

Applicable to ALL capital assets

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 3. a. If "yes," when was it approved by the agency head?   

 

Applicable to ALL capital assets

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 4. Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline   

 

Complete the following table to compare actual performance against the current performance baseline and to the initial performance baseline. In the Current Baseline section, for all milestones listed, you should provide both the baseline and actual completion dates (e.g., “03/23/2003”/ “04/28/2004”) and the baseline and actual total costs (in $ Millions). In the event that a milestone is not found in both the initial and current baseline, leave the associated cells blank. Note that the ‘Description of Milestone’ and ‘Percent Complete’ fields are required. Indicate ‘0’ for any milestone no longer active.

 

 

 

 

Métier | work forward
Powered by WorkLenz
© Copyright. Métier, Ltd. 1999-2007. All rights reserved.
Patent Pending Application Numbers: 09/334,256;09/536,378;09/536,383;7,062,449;60/642,983;11/090,038
Version 5.0