Exhibit 300 FY2009

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 300 FY2009  

 

 

PART I: SUMMARY INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION  

In Part I, complete Sections A, B, C, and D for all capital assets (IT and non-IT). Complete Sections E and F for IT capital assets.

 

 

 

Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets)  

The following series of questions are to be completed for all investments.

 

 

 

I. A. 1. Date of Submission:   

 

 

 

2007-09-10

 

 

I. A. 2. Agency:   

 

 

 

005

 

 

I. A. 3. Bureau:   

 

 

 

32

 

 

I. A. 4. Name of this Capital Asset:   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

National Animal Identification System (NAIS)

 

 

I. A. 5. Unique Project (Investment) Identifier:   

 

For IT investment only, see section 53. For all other, use agency ID system.

 

 

005-32-01-61-01-9010-00

 

 

I. A. 6. What kind of investment will this be in FY2009?   

 

Please NOTE: Investments moving to O&M in FY2009, with Planning/Acquisition activities prior to FY2009 should not select O&M. These investments should indicate their current status.

 

 

Mixed Life Cycle

 

 

I. A. 7. What was the first budget year this investment was submitted to OMB?   

 

 

 

FY2004

 

 

I. A. 8. Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this, closes in part or in whole, an identified agency performance gap:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

This investment is designed to create a national animal identification system that is capable of assigning national premises id numbers, allocating animal id numbers, tracking tag distribution, and assisting animal health officials in performing trace-backs on animal movements in case of an adverse animal health event.

 

 

I. A. 9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 9. a. If "yes," what was the date of this approval?   

 

 

 

2007-08-29

 

 

I. A. 10. Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 11. Contact information of Project Manager  

 

 

Name   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

Mike McDonough

 

 

Phone Number   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

970-494-7349

 

 

E-mail   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

mike.m.mcdonough@aphis.usda.gov

 

 

I. A. 11. a. What is the current FAC-P/PM certification level of the project/program manager?   

 

 

 

TBD

 

 

I. A. 12. Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project?   

 

 

 

no

 

 

I. A. 12. a. Will this investment include electronic assets (including computers)?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 12. b. Is this investment for new construction or major retrofit of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to non-IT assets only)   

 

 

 

no

 

 

I. A. 12. b. 1. If "yes," is an ESPC or UESC being used to help fund this investment?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. A. 12. b. 2. If "yes," will this investment meet sustainable design principles?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. A. 12. b. 3. If "yes," is it designed to be 30% more energy efficient than relevant code?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. A. 13. Does this investment directly support one of the PMA initiatives?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 13. a. If "yes," check all that apply:   

 

 

 

Expanded E-Government

 

 

I. A. 13. b. Briefly and specifically describe for each selected how this asset directly supports the identified initiative(s)? (e.g. If E-Gov is selected, is it an approved shared service provider or the managing partner?)   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

NAIS provides tracing of a suspect animal in the event of an animal health emergency. NAIS will fund the means for state governments and tribes to electronically access the national system for assigning or querying premises and animal identification. This can either replace or augment their local systems, which will remove redundancies and increase data integrity. It will also facilitate a coordinated interstate or state-federal response to an outbreak.

 

 

I. A. 14. Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)? (For more information about the PART, visit www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part.)   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 14. a. If "yes," does this investment address a weakness found during the PART review?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 14. b. If "yes," what is the name of the PARTed Program?   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

Animal Health Monitoring and Surveillance

 

 

I. A. 14. c. If "yes," what PART rating did it receive?   

 

 

 

Effective

 

 

I. A. 15. Is this investment for information technology?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 16. What is the level of the IT Project? (per CIO Council PM Guidance)   

 

Level 1 - Projects with low-to-moderate complexity and risk. Example: Bureau-level project such as a stand-alone information system that has low- to-moderate complexity and risk.
Level 2 - Projects with high complexity and/or risk which are critical to the mission of the organization. Examples: Projects that are part of a portfolio of projects/systems that impact each other and/or impact mission activities. Department-wide projects that impact cross-organizational missions, such as an agency-wide system integration that includes large scale Enterprise Resource Planning (e.g., the DoD Business Mgmt Modernization Program).
Level 3 - Projects that have high complexity, and/or risk, and have government-wide impact. Examples: Government-wide initiative (E-GOV, President's Management Agenda). High interest projects with Congress, GAO, OMB, or the general public. Cross-cutting initiative (Homeland Security).

 

 

Level 2

 

 

I. A. 17. What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per CIO Council’s PM Guidance):   

 

(1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment;(2) Project manager qualification is under review for this investment;(3) Project manager assigned to investment, but does not meet requirements;(4) Project manager assigned but qualification status review has not yet started;(5) No Project manager has yet been assigned to this investment

 

 

(1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment

 

 

I. A. 18. Is this investment identified as "high risk" on the Q4-FY 2007 agency high risk report (per OMB Memorandum M-05-23)?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 19. Is this a financial management system?   

 

 

 

no

 

 

I. A. 19. a. If "yes," does this investment address a FFMIA compliance area?   

 

 

 

no

 

 

I. A. 19. a. 1. If "yes," which compliance area   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. A. 19. a. 2. If "no," what does it address?   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

In accordance with the NAIS guiding principles, the system must be able to allow tracking of animals from point of origin to processing in a timely manner based on disease of concern without unnecessary burden to producers and other stakeholders. In order to successfully accomplish this, it is necessary to gather, compile and be able to report on data surrounding the movement of animals within the US herd.

 

 

I. A. 19. b. If "yes," please identify the system name(s) and system acronym(s) as reported in the most recent financial systems inventory update required by Circular A-11 section 52   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. A. 20. What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2009 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%)  

 

 

I. A. 20. a. Hardware   

 

 

 

5

 

 

I. A. 20. b. Software   

 

 

 

6

 

 

I. A. 20. c. Services   

 

 

 

70

 

 

I. A. 20. d. Other   

 

 

 

19

 

 

I. A. 21. If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities?   

 

 

 

n/a

 

 

I. A. 22. Contact information of individual responsible for privacy related questions:  

 

 

I. A. 22. a. Name   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

Neil Hammerschmidt

 

 

I. A. 22. b. Phone Number   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

301-734-5571

 

 

I. A. 22. c. Title   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

Coordinator - National Animal Identification System

 

 

I. A. 22. d. E-mail   

 

(short text - 250 characters)

 

 

neil.e.hammerschmidt@aphis.usda.gov

 

 

I. A. 23. Are the records produced by this investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. A. 24. Does this investment directly support one of the GAO High Risk Areas?   

 

Question 24 must be answered by all Investments:

 

 

yes

 

 

Section B: Summary of Spending (All Capital Assets)  

 

 

I. B. 1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated "Government FTE Cost," and should be excluded from the amounts shown for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." The "TOTAL" estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report.   

 

Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing and partner agencies).
Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented.

 

 

 

PY-1 Spending Prior to 2007

PY 2007

CY 2008

BY 2009

BY+1 2010

BY+2 2011

BY+3 2012

BY+4 2013 and Beyond

Total

Planning

0.060

0

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition

14.710

3.190

3.170

1.650

 

 

 

 

 

Subtotal Planning & Acquisition

14.770

3.190

3.170

1.650

 

 

 

 

 

Operations & Maintenance

0.600

2.630

2.978

2.121

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

15.370

5.820

6.148

3.771

 

 

 

 

 

Government FTE Costs

2.010

0.910

0.831

0.856

 

 

 

 

 

Number of FTE represented by cost

19

7

8

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. B. 2. Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. B. 2. a. If "yes," How many and in what year?   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

NAIS expects to hire one additional FTE in 2010.

 

 

I. B. 3. If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2008 President's budget request, briefly explain those changes.   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

An Exhibit 300 was not submitted for NAIS for FY2008.

 

 

Section C: Acquisition/Contract Strategy (All Capital Assets)  

 

 

I. C. 1. Complete the table for all (including all non-Federal) contracts and/or task orders currently in place or planned for this investment. Total Value should include all option years for each contract. Contracts and/or task orders completed do not need to be included.   

 

SIS - Share in Services contract; ESPC - Energy savings performance contract ; UESC - Utility energy efficiency service contract; EUL - Enhanced use lease contract; N/A - no alternative financing used.
(Character Limitations: Contract or Task Order Number - 250 Characters; Type of Contract/Task Order - 250 Characters; Name of CO - 250 Characters; CO Contact Information - 250 Characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. C. 2. If earned value is not required or will not be a contract requirement for any of the contracts or task orders above, explain why:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. C. 3. Do the contracts ensure Section 508 compliance?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. C. 3. a. Explain Why:   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. C. 4. Is there an acquisition plan which has been approved in accordance with agency requirements?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. C. 4. a. If "yes," what is the date?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. C. 4. b. If "no," will an acquisition plan be developed?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. C. 4. b. 1. If "no," briefly explain why:   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

Section D: Performance Information (All Capital Assets)  

In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300, performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the agency’s mission and strategic goals, and performance measures (indicators) must be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency's strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill. They are the internal and external performance benefits this investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved that do not have a quantitative measure.

 

 

 

I. D. 1. Table 1. Performance Information Table   

 

In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300, performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the agency’s mission and strategic goals, and performance measures (indicators) must be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency's strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill. They are the internal and external performance benefits this investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved that do not have a quantitative measure.

Agencies must use the following table to report performance goals and measures for the major investment and use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding "Measurement Area" and "Measurement Grouping" identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for each of the four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at www.egov.gov. The table can be extended to include performance measures for years beyond FY 2009.

 

 

 

Strategic Goal(s) Supported

Measurement Area

Measurement Grouping

Measurement Indicator

Baseline

Target

Actual Results

2007

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase percentage of premises registered by States

30% of the total eligible premises

10% more

report at end of fiscal year

2007

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase the number of devices tracked in the Animal ID Number management System

2 Million devices

8 Million new

report at end of fiscal year

2007

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase number of animal tracking systems participating in Animal Trace Processing System

5 ATDs

5 new ATDs

report at end of fiscal year

2007

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Processes and Activities

Information Management

VS Integrated systems (Brucellosis, Scrapie, Tuberculosis)

0 systems

3 new systems

report at end of fiscal year

2007

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Customer Results

Information Management

Percent of exceptions in address validation process

10% of the total premises registered

5% or less

7%

2007

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Technology

Information Management

System Availability (all modules)

95% of the time

99.5% of the time

95.0%

2008

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase percentage of States premises registered by

40% of the total eligible premises

20% more

 

2008

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase the number of devices tracked in the Animal ID Number management System

10 million devices

15 Million new

 

2008

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase number of animal tracking systems participating in Animal Trace Processing System

10 ATDs

5 new ATDs

 

2008

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Processes and Activities

Information Management

VS Integrated systems, VHS, Avian Influenza

3 Systems

2 new systems

 

2008

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Customer Results

Information Management

Percent of exceptions in address validation process

7% of the total premises registered

5% or less

 

2008

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Technology

Information Management

System Availability (all modules)

95%

99% of the time

 

2009

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase percentage of States premises registered by

60% of the total eligible premises 25% existing renewal

20% more

 

2009

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase the number of devices tracked in the Animal ID Number management System

25 Million

15 Million new

 

2009

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase number of animal tracking systems participating in Animal Trace Processing System and introduce GIN

15 ATDs 28 Million GIN (brands)

5 new ATDs 2 Million Group ID Numbers (GIN) new

 

2009

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase number of animal tracking records from Brand States

0 records

28 Million new

 

2009

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Processes and Activities

Information Management

VS Integrated systems: BSE, CSF, VSPS

5 ATDs

3 new systems

 

2009

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Customer Results

Information Management

Percent of exceptions in address validation process

5% of the total premises registered

5% or less

 

2009

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Technology

Information Management

System Availability (all modules)

99% of the time

100% of the time

 

2010

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase percentage of States premises registered by

80% of the total eligible premises 25% existing renewal

20% more

 

2010

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase number of animal tracking systems participating in Animal Trace Processing System

20 ATDs, 30 Million GIN

5 new ATDs 4 Million new GIN

 

2010

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase the number of devices tracked in the Animal ID Number management System

40 Million devices

10 Million new

 

2010

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Processes and Activities

Information Management

VS Integrated systems (NSU, PRV, CWD)

8 systems

3 new systems

 

2010

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Customer Results

Information Management

Percent of exceptions in address validation process

5% of the total premises registered

5% or less

 

2010

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Technology

Information Management

System Availability (all modules)

100% of the time

100% of the time

 

2011

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase percentage of States premises registered by

100% of the total eligible premises 25% existing renewal

5% more

 

2011

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase the number of devices tracked in the Animal ID Number management System

50 Million devices

10 Million new

 

2011

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase number of animal tracking systems participating in Animal Trace Processing System

25 ATDs, 34 Million GIN

5 new ATDs 6 Million new GIN

 

2011

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Processes and Activities

Information Management

VS Integrated systems (Johne's)

11 systems

1 new system

 

2011

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Customer Results

Information Management

Percent of exceptions in address validation process

5% of the total premises registered

5% or less

 

2011

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Technology

Information Management

System Availability (all modules)

100% of the time

100% of the time

 

2011

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase the number of devices tracked in the Animal ID Number management System

50 Million devices

10 Million new

 

2011

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Mission and Business Results

Information Management

Increase number of animal tracking systems participating in Aimal Trace Processing System

25 ATDs, 34 Million GIN

5 new ATDs 6 Million new GIN

 

2011

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Processes and Activities

Information Management

VS Integrated systems (Johne's)

11 systems

1 new system

 

2011

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Customer Results

Information Management

Percent of exceptions in address validation process

5% of the total premises registered

5% or less

 

2011

Enhance protection and safety of the Nation's agriculture and food supply

Technology

Information Management

System Availability (all modules)

100% of the time

100% of the time

 

 

 

Section E: Security and Privacy (IT Capital Assets only)  

In order to successfully address this area of the business case, each question below must be answered at the system/application level, not at a program or agency level. Systems supporting this investment on the planning and operational systems security tables should match the systems on the privacy table below. Systems on the Operational Security Table must be included on your agency FISMA system inventory and should be easily referenced in the inventory (i.e., should use the same name or identifier).

For existing Mixed-Life Cycle investments where enhancement, development, and/or modernization is planned, include the investment in both the “Systems in Planning” table (Table 3) and the “Operational Systems” table (Table 4). Systems which are already operational, but have enhancement, development, and/or modernization activity, should be included in both Table 3 and Table 4. Table 3 should reflect the planned date for the system changes to be complete and operational, and the planned date for the associated C&A update. Table 4 should reflect the current status of the requirements listed. In this context, information contained within Table 3 should characterize what updates to testing and documentation will occur before implementing the enhancements; and Table 4 should characterize the current state of the materials associated with the existing system.

All systems listed in the two security tables should be identified in the privacy table. The list of systems in the “Name of System” column of the privacy table (Table 8) should match the systems listed in columns titled “Name of System” in the security tables (Tables 3 and 4). For the Privacy table, it is possible that there may not be a one-to-one ratio between the list of systems and the related privacy documents. For example, one PIA could cover multiple systems. If this is the case, a working link to the PIA may be listed in column (d) of the privacy table more than once (for each system covered by the PIA).

 

 

 

I. E. 1. Have the IT security costs for the system(s) been identified and integrated into the overall costs of the investment?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 1. a. If "yes," provide the "Percentage IT Security" for the budget year:   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 2. Is identifying and assessing security and privacy risks a part of the overall risk management effort for each system supporting or part of this investment?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 3. Systems in Planning and Undergoing Enhancement(s) – Security Table:   

 

The questions asking whether there is a PIA which covers the system and whether a SORN is required for the system are discrete from the narrative fields. The narrative column provides an opportunity for free text explanation why a working link is not provided. For example, a SORN may be required for the system, but the system is not yet operational. In this circumstance, answer “yes” for column (e) and in the narrative in column (f), explain that because the system is not operational the SORN is not yet required to be published.

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 4. Operational Systems - Security:   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 5. Have any weaknesses related to any of the systems part of or supporting this investment been identified by the agency or IG?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 5. a. If "yes," have those weaknesses been incorporated into the agency's plan of action and milestone process?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 6. Indicate whether an increase in IT security funding is requested to remediate IT security weaknesses?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 6. a. If "yes," specify the amount, provide a general description of the weakness, and explain how the funding request will remediate the weakness.   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 7. How are contractor security procedures monitored, verified, and validated by the agency for the contractor systems above?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. E. 8. Planning & Operational Systems - Privacy Table:   

 

Details for Text Options:
Column (d): If yes to (c), provide the link(s) to the publicly posted PIA(s) with which this system is associated. If no to (c), provide an explanation why the PIA has not been publicly posted or why the PIA has not been conducted.

Column (f): If yes to (e), provide the link(s) to where the current and up to date SORN(s) is published in the federal register. If no to (e), provide an explanation why the SORN has not been published or why there isn’t a current and up to date SORN.

Note: Links must be provided to specific documents not general privacy websites.

 

 

 

 

 

Section F: Enterprise Architecture (EA) (IT Capital Assets only)  

In order to successfully address this area of the business case and capital asset plan you must ensure the investment is included in the agency's EA and Capital Planning and Invesment Control (CPIC) process, and is mapped to and supports the FEA. You must also ensure the business case demonstrates the relationship between the investment and the business, performance, data, services, application, and technology layers of the agency's EA.

 

 

 

I. F. 1. Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. F. 1. a. If "no," please explain why?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. F. 2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?   

 

 

 

no

 

 

I. F. 2. a. If "yes," provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment.   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. F. 2. b. If "no," please explain why?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

There is no transition activity underway at this time.

 

 

I. F. 3. Is this investment identified in a completed (contains a target architecture) and approved segment architecture?   

 

 

 

no

 

 

I. F. 3. a. If "yes," provide the name of the segment architecture.   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

I. F. 4. Service Component Reference Model (SRM) Table :   

 

Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.egov.gov.

a. Use existing SRM Components or identify as “NEW”. A “NEW” component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM.
b. A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission.
c. ‘Internal’ reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. ‘External’ reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government.
d. Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount transferred to another agency to pay for the service. The percentages in this column can, but are not required to, add up to 100%.

 

 

 

Agency Component Description

FEA SRM Service Type

FEA SRM Component (a)

Service Component Reused - Component Name (b)

Service Component Reused - UPI (b)

Internal or External Reuse? (c)

BY Funding Percentage (d)

Registration Service

Interface facilitating USDA customers to registering and identifying premises

Customer Initiated Assistance

Self-Service

 

 

No Reuse

12

Location Validation Service

Validate premises locations and generate premises identification numbers

Search

Query

Query

005-32-01-61-01-9010-00

Internal

12

Data Management Service

Provide the ability to correct,identify, and maintain data

Data Management

Loading and Archiving

 

 

No Reuse

12

Exception Management Service

Customer interface to request further investigate of a premises that could not identified though the location validation service

Tracking and Workflow

Conflict Resolution

 

 

No Reuse

15

Identification Service

Provide unique identification numbers (ID) for assignment to animal ID devices

Customer Initiated Assistance

Self-Service

 

 

No Reuse

12

Tracing Service

Enables the reporting and tracking of identified animal disease problems.

Tracking and Workflow

Case Management

 

 

No Reuse

25

Reporting & Analysis Services

Support the use of pre-conceived or pre-written reports

Reporting

Standardized / Canned

Standardized / Canned

005-32-01-61-01-9010-00

Internal

12

Authentication

Authenticates users

Security Management

Identification and Authentication

Identification and Authentication

 

External

0

 

 

I. F. 5. Table 1. Technical Reference Model (TRM) Table:   

 

To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment.

a. Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications
b. In the Service Specification field, agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate.

 

 

 

FEA TRM Service Area

FEA TRM Service Category

FEA TRM Service Standard

Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name)

Self-Service

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Other Electronic Channels

System to System

Self-Service

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Other Electronic Channels

Uniform Resource Locator (URL)

Self-Service

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Other Electronic Channels

Web Services

Self-Service

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Collaboration / Communications

Electronic Mail (Email)

Self-Service

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Web Browser

Internet Explorer

Self-Service

Service Access and Delivery

Delivery Channels

Internet

Not Available

Self-Service

Service Access and Delivery

Service Requirements

Legislative / Compliance

Section 508

Self-Service

Service Access and Delivery

Service Requirements

Legislative / Compliance

Security

Self-Service

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Supporting Network Services

Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP)

Self-Service

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Service Transport

Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP)

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Database / Storage

Database

Oracle

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Database / Storage

Storage

Storage Area Network (SAN)

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Web Servers

Not Available

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Application Servers

Not Available

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Microprocessor

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Random Access Memory (RAM)

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID)

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Hard Disk Drive

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Network Devices / Standards

Firewall

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Peripherals

Printer

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Servers / Computers

Enterprise Server

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Software Configuration Management

Change Management

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Business Cycle Testing

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Configuration Testing

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Functional Testing

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Installation Testing

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Load/Stress/Volume Testing

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Performance Profiling

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Reliability Testing

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Security and Access Control Testing

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Usability Testing (508 Testing)

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Modeling

Unified Modeling Language

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Support Platforms

Platform Dependent

Windows

Self-Service

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Support Platforms

Platform Independent

Java 2 Platform Enterprise Edition (J2EE)

Self-Service

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

Java Database Connectivity (JDBC)

Self-Service

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

Open Database Connectivity (ODBC)

Self-Service

Component Framework

Presentation / Interface

Static Display

Hyper Text Markup Language (HTML)

Self-Service

Component Framework

Data Interchange

Data Exchange

SOAP

Self-Service

Component Framework

Security

Certificates / Digital Signatures

Secure Sockets Layer (SSL)

Self-Service

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Format / Classification

eXtensible Markup Language (XML)

Self-Service

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Types / Validation

Document Type Definition (DTD)

Self-Service

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Types / Validation

XML Schema

Self-Service

Service Interface and Integration

Interface

Service Discovery

Universal Description Discovery and Integration (UDDI)

Self-Service

Service Interface and Integration

Interface

Service Description / Interface

Web Service Description Language (WSDL)

Self-Service

Service Interface and Integration

Interface

Service Description / Interface

Acquisition Program Interface (API)/Protocol

Query

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Other Electronic Channels

URL

Query

Service Access and Delivery

Delivery Channels

Internet

Not Available

Query

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

JDBC

Query

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

ODBC

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Database / Storage

Database

Oracle

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Database / Storage

Storage

SAN

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Application Servers

Not Available

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Web Servers

Not Available

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Hard Disk Drive

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Microprocessor

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Random Access Memory (RAM)

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Network Devices / Standards

Firewall

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Peripherals

Printer

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Servers / Computers

Enterprise Server

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Software Configuration Management

Change Management

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Business Cycle Testing

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Configuration Testing

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Functional Testing

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Installation Testing

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Load/Stress/Volume Testing

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Performance Testing

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Reliability Testing

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Security and Access Control Testing

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Usability Testing (508 Testing)

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Modeling

Unified Modeling Language

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Support Platforms

Platform Dependent

Windows

Query

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Support Platforms

Platform Independent

JREE

Query

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

JDBC

Query

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

ODBC

Query

Component Framework

Security

Certificates / Digital Signatures

SSL

Query

Component Framework

Presentation / Interface

Dynamic Server-Side Display

Java Server Pages (JSP)

Query

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Format / Classification

XML

Loading and Archiving

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Other Electronic Channels

System to System

Loading and Archiving

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Other Electronic Channels

URL

Loading and Archiving

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Web Browser

Internet Explorer

Loading and Archiving

Service Access and Delivery

Delivery Channels

Internet

Not Available

Loading and Archiving

Service Access and Delivery

Service Requirements

Legislative / Compliance

Section 508

Loading and Archiving

Service Access and Delivery

Service Requirements

Legislative / Compliance

Security

Loading and Archiving

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Supporting Network Services

SMTP

Loading and Archiving

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Service Transport

HTTP

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Database / Storage

Database

Oracle

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Database / Storage

Storage

SAN

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Application Servers

Not Available

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Web Servers

Not Available

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Hard Disk Drive

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Microprocessor

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

RAM

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

RAID

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Network Devices / Standards

Firewall

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Peripherals

Printer

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Servers / Computers

Enterprise Server

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Software Configuration Management

Change Management

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Business Cycle Testing

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Configuration Testing

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Functional Testing

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Installation Testing

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Load/Stress/Volume Testing

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Performance Profiling

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Reliability Testing

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Security and Access Control Testing

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Usability Testing (508 Testing)

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Modeling

Unified Modeling Language

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Support Platforms

Platform Dependent

Windows

Loading and Archiving

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Support Platforms

Platform Independent

J2EE

Loading and Archiving

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

JDBC

Loading and Archiving

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

ODBC

Loading and Archiving

Component Framework

Presentation / Interface

Static Display

HTML

Loading and Archiving

Component Framework

Data Interchange

Data Exchange

SOAP

Loading and Archiving

Component Framework

Security

Certificates / Digital Signatures

SSL

Loading and Archiving

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Format / Classification

XML

Loading and Archiving

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Types / Validation

DTD

Conflict Resolution

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Other Electronic Channels

System to System

Conflict Resolution

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Other Electronic Channels

Uniform Resource Locator (URL)

Conflict Resolution

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Web Browser

Internel Explorer

Conflict Resolution

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Collaboration / Communications

Electroic Mail (Email)

Conflict Resolution

Service Access and Delivery

Delivery Channels

Internet

Not Available

Conflict Resolution

Service Access and Delivery

Service Requirements

Legislative / Compliance

Section 508

Conflict Resolution

Service Access and Delivery

Service Requirements

Legislative / Compliance

Security

Conflict Resolution

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Supporting Network Services

Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP)

Conflict Resolution

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Service Transport

Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Database / Storage

Database

Oracle

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Database / Storage

Storage

Storage Area Network (SAN)

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Application Servers

Not Available

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Web Servers

Not Available

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Hard Disk Drive

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Microprocessor

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Random Access Memory

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID)

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Network Devices / Standards

Firewall

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Peripherals

Printer

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Servers / Computers

Enterprise Server

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Software Configuration Management

Change Management

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Business Cycle Testing

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Configuration Testing

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Functional Testing

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Installation Testing

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Load/Stress/Volume Testing

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Performance Profiling

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Reliability Testing

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Security and Access Control Testing

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Usability Testing (508 Testing)

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Modeling

Unified Modeling Language

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Support Platforms

Platform Dependent

Windows

Conflict Resolution

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Support Platforms

Platform Independent

Java 2 Platform Enterprise Edition (J2EE)

Conflict Resolution

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

Java Database Connectivity (JDBC)

Conflict Resolution

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

Open Database Connectivity (ODBC)

Conflict Resolution

Component Framework

Presentation / Interface

Static Display

Hyper Text Markup Language (HTML)

Conflict Resolution

Component Framework

Data Interchange

Data Exchange

SOAP

Conflict Resolution

Component Framework

Security

Certificates / Digital Signatures

Secure Sockets Layer (SSL)

Conflict Resolution

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Format / Classification

eXtensible Markup Language (XML)

Conflict Resolution

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Types / Validation

Document Type Definition (DTD)

Case Management

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Other Electronic Channels

System to System

Case Management

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Other Electronic Channels

Uniform Resource Locator (URL)

Case Management

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Other Electronic Channels

Web Services

Case Management

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Collaboration / Communications

 

Case Management

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Web Browser

Internet Explorer

Case Management

Service Access and Delivery

Delivery Channels

Internet

Not Available

Case Management

Service Access and Delivery

Service Requirements

Legislative / Compliance

Section 508

Case Management

Service Access and Delivery

Service Requirements

Legislative / Compliance

Security

Case Management

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Supporting Network Services

Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP)

Case Management

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Service Transport

Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP)

Case Management

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Service Transport

Hyper Text Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS)

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Database / Storage

Database

Oracle

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Database / Storage

Storage

Storage Area Network (SAN)

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Application Servers

Not Available

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Web Servers

Not Available

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Hard Disk Drive

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Microprocessor

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Random Access Memory (RAM)

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID)

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Network Devices / Standards

Firewall

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Peripherals

Printer

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Servers / Computers

Enterprise Server

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Software Configuration Management

Change Management

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Business Cycle Testing

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Configuration Testing

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Functional Testing

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Installation Testing

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Load/Stress/Volume Testing

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Performance Profiling

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Reliability Testing

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Security and Access Control Testing

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Usability Testing (508 Testing)

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Modeling

Unified Modeling Language

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Support Platforms

Platform Dependent

Windows

Case Management

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Support Platforms

Platform Independent

Java 2 Platform Enterprise Edition (J2EE)

Case Management

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

Java Database Connectivity (JDBC)

Case Management

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

Open Database Connectivity (ODBC)

Case Management

Component Framework

Presentation / Interface

Static Display

Hyper Text Markup Language (HTML)

Case Management

Component Framework

Data Interchange

Data Exchange

SOAP

Case Management

Component Framework

Security

Certificates / Digital Signatures

Secure Sockets Layer (SSL)

Case Management

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Format / Classification

eXtensible Markup Language (XML)

Case Management

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Types / Validation

Document Type Definition (DTD)

Case Management

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Types / Validation

XML Schema

Case Management

Service Interface and Integration

Interface

Service Discovery

Universal Description Discovery and Integration (UDDI)

Case Management

Service Interface and Integration

Interface

Service Description / Interface

Web Service Description Language (WSDL)

Case Management

Service Interface and Integration

Interface

Service Description / Interface

Acquisition Program Interface (API)/Protocol

Standardized / Canned

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Other Electronic Channels

System to System

Standardized / Canned

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Other Electronic Channels

Uniform Resource Locator (URL)

Standardized / Canned

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Other Electronic Channels

Web Services

Standardized / Canned

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Collaboration / Communications

Electronic Mail (Email)

Standardized / Canned

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Web Browser

Internet Explorer

Standardized / Canned

Service Access and Delivery

Delivery Channels

Internet

Not Available

Standardized / Canned

Service Access and Delivery

Service Requirements

Legislative / Compliance

Section 508

Standardized / Canned

Service Access and Delivery

Service Requirements

Legislative / Compliance

Security

Standardized / Canned

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Supporting Network Services

Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP)

Standardized / Canned

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Service Transport

Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP)

Standardized / Canned

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Service Transport

Hyper Text Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS)

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Database / Storage

Database

Oracle

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Database / Storage

Storage

Storage Area Network (SAN)

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Application Servers

Not Available

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Web Servers

Not Available

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Hard Disk Drive

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Microprocessor

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Random Access Memory (RAM)

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID)

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Network Devices / Standards

Firewall

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Peripherals

Printer

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Servers / Computers

Enterprise Server

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Software Configuration Management

Change Management

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Business Cycle Testing

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Configuration Testing

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Functional Testing

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Installation Testing

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Load/Stress/Volume Testing

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Performance Profiling

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Reliability Testing

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Security and Access Control Testing

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Usability Testing (508 Testing)

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Modeling

Unified Modeling Language

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Support Platforms

Platform Dependent

Windows

Standardized / Canned

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Support Platforms

Platform Independent

Java 2 Platform Enterprise Edition (J2EE)

Standardized / Canned

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

Java Database Connectivity (JDBC)

Standardized / Canned

Component Framework

Data Management

Database Connectivity

Open Database Connectivity (ODBC)

Standardized / Canned

Component Framework

Presentation / Interface

Static Display

Hyper Text Markup Language (HTML)

Standardized / Canned

Component Framework

Data Interchange

Data Exchange

SOAP

Standardized / Canned

Component Framework

Security

Certificates / Digital Signatures

Secure Sockets Layer (SSL)

Standardized / Canned

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Format / Classification

eXtensible Markup Language (XML)

Standardized / Canned

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Types / Validation

Document Type Definition (DTD)

Standardized / Canned

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Types / Validation

XML Schema

Standardized / Canned

Service Interface and Integration

Interface

Service Discovery

Universal Description Discovery and Integration (UDDI)

Standardized / Canned

Service Interface and Integration

Interface

Service Description / Interface

 

Standardized / Canned

Service Interface and Integration

Interface

Service Description / Interface

 

Identification and Authentication

Service Access and Delivery

Access Channels

Other Electronic Channels

System to System

Identification and Authentication

Service Access and Delivery

Delivery Channels

Internet

Not Available

Identification and Authentication

Service Access and Delivery

Service Requirements

Legislative / Compliance

Section 508

Identification and Authentication

Service Access and Delivery

Service Requirements

Legislative / Compliance

Security

Identification and Authentication

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Supporting Network Services

SMTP

Identification and Authentication

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Service Transport

HTTP

Identification and Authentication

Service Access and Delivery

Service Transport

Service Transport

HTTPS

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Application Servers

Not Available

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Storage

SAN

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Application Servers

Not Available

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Delivery Servers

Web Servers

Not Available

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Hard Disk Drive

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

Microprocessor

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

RAM

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Embedded Technology Devices

RAID

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Network Devices / Standards

Firewall

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Peripherals

Printer

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Hardware / Infrastructure

Servers / Computers

Enterprise Server

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Software Configuration Management

Change Management

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Business Cycle Testing

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Configuration Testing

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Functional Testing

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Installation Testing

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Load/Stress/Volume Testing

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Performance Profiling

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Reliability Testing

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Security and Access Control Testing

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Not Available

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Not Available

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Not Available

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Usability Testing (508 Testing)

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Not Available

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Not Available

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Not Available

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Not Available

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Not Available

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Functional Testing

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Not Available

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Not Available

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Not Available

Identification and Authentication

Service Platform and Infrastructure

Software Engineering

Test Management

Not Available

Identification and Authentication

Component Framework

Security

Certificates / Digital Signatures

SSL

Identification and Authentication

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Format / Classification

XML

Identification and Authentication

Service Interface and Integration

Interoperability

Data Types / Validation

DTD

 

 

I. F. 6. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

I. F. 6. a. If "yes," please describe.   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

NAIS uses USDA's eAuthentication. Users who log into the NAIS application's user interface are redirected to the eAuthentication site for verification. Upon supplying proper credentials, the user is passed back to the application's home page. In addition, NAIS uses web services to exchange information with other systems. These systems must also pass through eAuthentication before gaining access to the NAIS application's web services.

 

 

PART II: PLANNING, ACQUISITION AND PERFORMANCE INFORMATION  

Part II should be completed only for investments identified as “Planning” or “Full-Acquisition,” or “Mixed Life-Cycle” investments in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above

 

 

 

Section A: Alternatives Analysis (All Capital Assets)  

In selecting the best capital asset, you should identify and consider at least three viable alternatives, in addition to the current baseline, i.e., the status quo. Use OMB Circular A-94 for all investments and the Clinger Cohen Act of 1996 for IT investments to determine the criteria you should use in your Benefit/Cost Analysis.

 

 

 

II. A. 1. Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this project?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

II. A. 1. a. If "yes," provide the date the analysis was completed?   

 

 

 

2007-05-07

 

 

II. A. 1. b. If "no," what is the anticipated date this analysis will be completed?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. A. 1. c. If no analysis is planned, please briefly explain why:   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

II. A. 2. Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:   

 

(Character Limitations: Alternative Analyzed - 250 characters; Description of Alternative - 500 Characters)

 

 

 

Description of Alternative

Risk Lifecycle Cost Estimate

Risk Lifecycle Benefits Estimate

Wisconsin Livestock Identification Consortium (WLIC)

Use an existing, state-developed and nationally compatible livestock identification system for the purposes of protecting animal health, safeguarding market access, and offering opportunities to enhance the marketability of Wisconsin livestock products.

$38,419,000.000

$0.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. A. 3. Which alternative was selected by the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee and why was it chosen?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

Alternative 1, the WLIC, was chosen as the foundation application for the Standard Premises Registration System for NAIS. In addition to the cost analysis above, an assessment was conducted to evaluate the three alternatives with respect to both business and technical criteria, including functionality, supportability, stability, data conversion requirements, scalability, documentation, and risk. WLIC outscored the other alternatives by in excess of 10% of the possible total score.

 

 

II. A. 4. What specific qualitative benefits will be realized?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

1. Approved ability for traceback of animals in the case of a disease, pest, or bioterrorism event; 2. Reduced loss to U.S. agriculture; 3. Improved market access for U.S. livestock.

 

 

II. A. 5. Will the selected alternative replace a legacy system in-part or in-whole?   

 

 

 

no

 

 

II. A. 5. a. If “yes,” are the migration costs associated with the migration to the selected alternative included in this investment, the legacy investment, or in a separate migration investment?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. A. 5. b. Table 1. If "yes," please provide the following information:   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Section B: Risk Management (All Capital Assets)  

You should have performed a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of this investment's life-cycle, developed a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment's life-cycle.

 

 

 

II. B. 1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?   

 

 

 

yes

 

 

II. B. 1. a. If "yes," what is the date of the plan?   

 

 

 

2007-03-02

 

 

II. B. 1. b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?   

 

 

 

no

 

 

II. B. 1. c. If "yes," describe any significant changes:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

II. B. 2. If there currently is no plan, will a plan be developed?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. B. 2. a. If "yes," what is the planned completion date?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. B. 2. b. If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

II. B. 3. Briefly describe how investment risks are reflected in the life cycle cost estimate and investment schedule:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

The risks to this project can be loosely divided into two major categories. Each of these risks has been individually assessed, along with its potential impact, and mitigated to the extent possible. All risks are constantly re-assessed, including on a formal basis annually. The first high-level risk category includes the standard risks associated with information technology development efforts, such as loss of funding, technical obsolescence, hardware/software reliability, system interoperability, resource availability, etc. Earned-value management is required of all the selected vendors to identify cost or schedule problems as soon as possible to enable immediate initiation of corrective action. The other category of risks semi-uniquely associated with the NAIS are a function of the political environment of the project. The actual scope, the associated business functionality, and the technical direction of the project are all dynamic based on decisions still being made at the Department level. Specifically, the degree of privatization of the fundamental functionality, as well as federal visibility and oversight of the resulting private databases, is still being formulated. Several alternatives have been proposed, priced, and scheduled, all within current funding expectations. Priorities are shifted as decisions become known, with higher priorities given to modules or functionality common to multiple alternatives, minimizing potential lost effort. Because APHIS is an emergency response agency, many of the IT applications maintained by VS, like NAIS, are in direct support of these emergency responses. Although it is difficult to forecast changes to existing project schedules related to these responses, allowance has been made to accommodate several alternatives.

 

 

Section C: Cost and Schedule Performance (All Capital Assets)  

EVM is required only on DME portions of investments. For mixed lifecycle investments, O&M milestones should still be included in the table (Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline). This table should accurately reflect the milestones in the initial baseline, as well as milestones in the current baseline.

 

 

 

II. C. 1. Does the earned value management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard - 748?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. C. 2. Is the CV or SV greater than 10%?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. C. 2. a. If "yes," was it the CV or SV or both ?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. C. 2. b. If "yes," explain the causes of the variance:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

II. C. 2. c. If "yes," describe the corrective actions:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

II. C. 3. Has the investment re-baselined during the past fiscal year?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. C. 3. a. If "yes," when was it approved by the agency head?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. C. 4. Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline   

 

Complete the following table to compare actual performance against the current performance baseline and to the initial performance baseline. In the Current Baseline section, for all milestones listed, you should provide both the baseline and actual completion dates (e.g., “03/23/2003”/ “04/28/2004”) and the baseline and actual total costs (in $ Millions). In the event that a milestone is not found in both the initial and current baseline, leave the associated cells blank. Note that the ‘Description of Milestone’ and ‘Percent Complete’ fields are required. Indicate ‘0’ for any milestone no longer active. (Character Limitations: Description of Milestone - 500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

PART III: FOR "OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE" INVESTMENTS ONLY (STEADY-STATE)  

Part III should be completed only for investments identified as "Operation and Maintenance" (Steady State) in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above.

 

 

 

Section A: Risk Management (All Capital Assets)  

You should have performed a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of this investment’s life-cycle, developed a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment’s life-cycle.

 

 

 

III. A. 1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

III. A. 1. a. If "yes," what is the date of the plan?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

III. A. 1. b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

III. A. 1. c. If "yes," describe any significant changes:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

III. A. 2. If there currently is no plan, will a plan be developed?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

III. A. 2. a. If "yes," what is the planned completion date?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

III. A. 2. b. If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

Section B: Cost and Schedule Performance (All Capital Assets)  

 

 

III. B. 1. Was operational analysis conducted?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

III. B. 1. a. If "yes," provide the date the analysis was completed.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

III. B. 1. b. If "yes," what were the results?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

III. B. 1. c. If "no," please explain why it was not conducted and if there are any plans to conduct operational analysis in the future:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

III. B. 2. Complete the following table to compare actual cost performance against the planned cost performance baseline. Milestones reported may include specific individual scheduled preventative and predictable corrective maintenance activities, or may be the total of planned annual operation and maintenance efforts).  

(Character Limitations: Description of Milestone - 250 Characters)

 

 

 

III. B. 2. a. What costs are included in the reported Cost/Schedule Performance information (Government Only/Contractor Only/Both)?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

III. B. 2. b. Comparison of Planned and Actual Cost   

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART IV: Planning For "Multi-Agency Collaboration" ONLY  

Part IV should be completed only for investments identified as an E-Gov initiative, an Line of Business (LOB) Initiative, or a Multi-Agency Collaboration effort., selected the “Multi-Agency Collaboration” choice in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above. Investments identified as “Multi-Agency Collaboration” will complete only Parts I and IV of the exhibit 300.

 

 

 

Section A: Multi-Agency Collaboration Oversight (All Capital Assets)  

Multi-agency Collaborations, such as E-Gov and LOB initiatives, should develop a joint exhibit 300.

 

 

 

IV. A. 1. Stakeholder Table   

 

As a joint exhibit 300, please identify the agency stakeholders. Provide the partner agency and partner agency approval date for this joint exhibit 300.

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 2. Partner Capital Assets within this Investment   

 

Provide the partnering strategies you are implementing with the participating agencies and organizations. Identify all partner agency capital assets supporting the common solution (section 300.7); Managing Partner capital assets should also be included in this joint exhibit 300. These capital assets should be included in the Summary of Spending table of Part I, Section B. All partner agency migration investments (section 53.4) should also be included in this table. Funding contributions/fee-for-service transfers should not be included in this table. (Partner Agency Asset UPIs should also appear on the Partner Agency's exhibit 53)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 3. Partner Funding Strategies ($millions)   

 

For jointly funded initiative activities, provide in the “Partner Funding Strategies Table”: the name(s) of partner agencies; the UPI of the partner agency investments; and the partner agency contributions for CY and BY. Please indicate partner contribution amounts (in-kind contributions should also be included in this amount) and fee-for-service amounts. (Partner Agency Asset UPIs should also appear on the Partner Agency's exhibit 53. For non-IT fee-for-service amounts the Partner exhibit 53 UPI can be left blank) (IT migration investments should not be included in this table)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 4. Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this project?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 4. a. If "yes," provide the date the analysis was completed?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 4. b. If "no," what is the anticipated date this analysis will be completed?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 4. c. If no analysis is planned, please briefly explain why:   

 

(medium text - 500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 5. Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 6. Which alternative was selected by the Initiative Governance process and why was it chosen?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 7. What specific qualitative benefits will be realized?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 8. Table 1. Federal Quantitative Benefits ($millions):   

 

What specific quantitative benefits will be realized (using current dollars)
Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 9. Will the selected alternative replace a legacy system in-part or in-whole?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 9. a. If "yes," are the migration costs associated with the migration to the selected alternative included in this investment, the legacy investment, or in a separate migration investment?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. A. 9. b. Table 1. If "yes," please provide the following information:   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Section B: Risk Management (All Capital Assets)  

You should have performed a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of this investment’s life-cycle, developed a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment’s life-cycle.

 

 

 

IV. B. 1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. B. 1. a. If "yes," what is the date of the plan?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. B. 1. b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. B. 1. c. If "yes," describe any significant changes:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. B. 2. If there currently is no plan, will a plan be developed?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. B. 2. a. If "yes," what is the planned completion date?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. B. 2. b. If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

Section C: Cost and Schedule Performance (All Capital Assets)  

You should also periodically be measuring the performance of operational assets against the baseline established during the planning or full acquisition phase (i.e., operational analysis), and be properly operating and maintaining the asset to maximize its useful life. Operational analysis may identify the need to redesign or modify an asset by identifying previously undetected faults in design, construction, or installation/integration, highlighting whether actual operation and maintenance costs vary significantly from budgeted costs, or documenting that the asset is failing to meet program requirements.

EVM is required only on DME portions of investments. For mixed lifecycle investments, O&M milestones should still be included in the table (Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline). This table should accurately reflect the milestones in the initial baseline, as well as milestones in the current baseline.

Answer the following questions about the status of this investment. Include information on all appropriate capital assets supporting this investment except for assets in which the performance information is reported in a separate exhibit 300.

 

 

 

IV. C. 1. Are you using EVM to manage this investment?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 1. a. If "yes," does the earned value management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard - 748?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 1. b. If "no," explain plans to implement EVM:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 1. c. If "N/A," please provide date operational analysis was conducted and a brief summary of the results?   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 2. Is the CV% or SV% greater than ± 10%? (CV% = CV/EV x 100; SV% = SV/PV x 100)   

 

NOT applicable for capital assets with ONLY O&M.

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 2. a. If "yes," was it the CV or SV or both ?   

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 2. b. If "yes," explain the causes of the variance:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 2. c. If "yes," describe the corrective actions:   

 

(long text - 2500 characters)

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 3. Has the investment re-baselined during the past fiscal year?   

 

Applicable to ALL capital assets

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 3. a. If "yes," when was it approved by the agency head?   

 

Applicable to ALL capital assets

 

 

 

 

 

IV. C. 4. Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline   

 

Complete the following table to compare actual performance against the current performance baseline and to the initial performance baseline. In the Current Baseline section, for all milestones listed, you should provide both the baseline and actual completion dates (e.g., “03/23/2003”/ “04/28/2004”) and the baseline and actual total costs (in $ Millions). In the event that a milestone is not found in both the initial and current baseline, leave the associated cells blank. Note that the ‘Description of Milestone’ and ‘Percent Complete’ fields are required. Indicate ‘0’ for any milestone no longer active.

 

 

 

 

Métier | work forward
Powered by WorkLenz
© Copyright. Métier, Ltd. 1999-2007. All rights reserved.
Patent Pending Application Numbers: 09/334,256;09/536,378;09/536,383;7,062,449;60/642,983;11/090,038
Version 5.0