Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment
Identifying a water quality problem in receiving waters is often the first step in the watershed management process. Water quality monitoring is also critical to ensure that watershed management strategies are improving water quality. Research within the National Water Program is improving sampling design and watershed monitoring approaches, enhancing monitoring methods and techniques, and examining data credibility. This research improves the understanding of local water resources and helps communities make informed decisions that improve water quality.
Research pertaining to "Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment" can
be broken into the following categories (linked further down on
this page):
Data
Analysis and Assessment
Monitoring
Methods and Techniques
Volunteer
Water Quality Monitoring Data
Data Analysis and Assessment
In order to obtain the highest quality data, the most appropriate
sampling design must be utilized. Land Grant University and CSREES
research explores sampling strategies and data assessment in
order to yield the most effective watershed management decisions.
Watershed monitoring approaches are also the focus of much attention.
Accomplishments and Examples:
Researchers
at the University of Arkansas found that current
sampling methods result in pollution loads for streams being underestimated
by as much as 20 percent
.
Pollution load increases dramatically during
storms, which are
rarely accounted for by monthly sampling.
The
development of watershed level monitoring approaches to support
watershed projects has been studied by researchers at North Carolina
State University by evaluating
US EPA Section 319 National Monitoring Projects (NMP)
.
Effective monitoring designs identified were:
paired watersheds, nested watersheds, single station-before/after,
and upstream/downstream.
A key recommendation is to monitor for multiple years in order
to document consistent, improving trends, document statistically
significant trends, and deal with the lag time that sometimes occurs
between land treatment and water quality improvements.
The
Utah State University Regional
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (REMAP) Project
,
with funding from US EPA, is developing a top-down
or strategic approach for monitoring rangeland watersheds.
The long-term goal of this proposal is to help managers understand
the cause of environmental
degradation and the location of potential problem areas within
these watersheds. This research should improve the allocation of
resources by providing greater insight to the identification of
problem areas and determining linkages between these areas and
stream sites.
Monitoring Methods and Techniques
Pathogens:
The public is demanding increased water quality monitoring to ensure
our waters are protected from various types of runoff that causes
elevated pathogen and bacteria levels in the water. Research through
CSREES and the Land Grant System is investigating and comparing
different methods to access bacteria levels in waterways so that
pathogens
can be
properly
managed and
prevented within watersheds. Researchers are also exploring
novel molecular techniques of Bacterial Source Tracking (BST).
New BST methods are a new tool for determining Total Maximum Daily
Load (TMDL) allocations, TMDL implementation plan development,
and watershed restoration.
Volunteer
water quality monitoring programs in the states of Indiana, Iowa,
Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin have teamed
up,
in an Extension Education grant from CSREES—“Building
Capacity of E. coli Monitoring by Volunteer Networks: A Multi-State
Effort”
,
to evaluate several types of e. coli monitoring
test kits for use
with volunteers and to develop a comprehensive training and education
program regarding bacteria monitoring. The project website also
summarizes related
bacterial monitoring research
.
The
Maine
Shore Stewards
,
University of Maine Cooperative Extension, is coordinating a new
program funded through EPA, the Maine Coastal Swim Beach Program.
The program will be conducting a side by
side study of two bacterial monitoring methods – Enterolert
method by Idexx in volunteer labs vs. membrane filtration with
24 hour incubation in certified professional labs.
The
overarching goal of the Environmental
Pathogens Information Network (EPINET)
, a National
Facilitation Project funded by CSREES in 2004, is to develop and
then transfer the fullest
possible understanding of how microbial
pathogens enter into and then function in watersheds so
that the spread of microorganisms and the diseases they cause can
be properly managed and prevented.
Researchers
at Virginia Tech host a website
that
provides an overview and describes current
methodologies and projects associated with bacterial source tracking
(BST).
University
of Rhode Island researchers are fingerprinting
sources of bacterial input
into
small residential watersheds. This new method may be useful to
identify localities
where watershed managers could initiate appropriate counter measures
that lead to water quality enhancement.
Researchers
at North Carolina State University are developing and testing new
bacterial source tracking (BST) techniques in conjunction
with watershed-based hydrologic analysis in a toolbox approach
to assist in the identification
of sources and loading rate of fecal coliform bacteria in three
North Carolina estuarine watersheds
.
This information will be used to improve the capacity of Total
Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) modeling and management for these and
other watersheds on the coast.
Researchers
at the University of North Carolina are utilizing the existing
framework established by the previously mentioned project,
but are using viral
pathogens as tools
to
investigate the sources and quantify loads of fecal contamination
from three watersheds with active crop and forestry agriculture.
They are providing input to the State’s Total Maximum Daily
Loads (TMDL) model to be used for TMDL implementation.
Research
data from the University of South Florida suggest
that enterococci
rather than E. coli should be used as source tracking bacteria
.
They also measured the pros and cons of two typing methods and
make recommendations for future development.
Biotic Indices:
Macroinvertebrate communities in streams are widely used to assess
and monitor ecosystem integrity. Research at Land Grant Universities
and within CSREES is assessing established biotic indices and
developing and testing new biotic indices to assess water quality
and watershed health.
Researchers
at the University of Vermont are conducting a project to improve
tolerance-based biotic indices in agricultural watersheds
.
This research program is designed to provide the scientific underpinning
needed to select appropriate indicators
for monitoring and assessing streams in agricultural watersheds.
American
Samoa Community College researchers are identifying
freshwater fishes and invertebrates that might serve
as metrics for a multimetric
index of biotic integrity
for
streams of American Samoa and analyzing chemical and physical properties
of stream waters to correlate these properties with differences
observed for the biological metrics.
A project
at UNH is developing keys
for identification of aquatic insects
that
will be useful in developing state and regional level
water quality indices therefore allowing rapid and more precise
assessment of water quality.
Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Data
In addition to engaging stakeholders in local water quality and
watershed issues, volunteer water quality monitoring programs collect
valuable water quality data that can help communities make informed
decisions that improve water quality. Research within CSREES and
Extension volunteer monitoring programs is improving the data credibility
of volunteer monitoring programs. Data from these Extension volunteer
monitoring programs is also being utilized in other research projects.
Data Credibility:
Researchers
at Michigan State University as part of their project "Information
Exchange, Citizen Monitoring and Best Management Practices within
Agricultural Watersheds” are
comparing data collected by high school volunteers and researchers
(Habron
2003
).
Researchers
at the University of Minnesota explored how
well beginning volunteer monitors could sort and identify macroinvertebrates
as
compared to professional entomologists.
They make specific recommendations to improve volunteer monitoring
programs.
A project
at the Center
for the Environment
at
Cornell University demonstrated that volunteers with only a modest
amount of training, when provided
with appropriate taxonomic
keys, can collect macroinvertebrate samples, identify organisms
to family, and calculate appropriate metrics. For more information,
contact Linda Wagenet lpw2@cornell.edu.
The
University
of Rhode Island Watershed Watch
program
conducted a study comparing volunteer collected data with professional
collected
data. They found no significant differences
between the two adding support to volunteer data credibility. For
more information, contact Linda Green lgreen@uri.edu.
Volunteer Monitoring Data Usage in Research:
The
New Hampshire Lakes
Lay Monitoring Program
(NH
LLMP) of the University of New Hampshire (UNH) Cooperative
Extension
incorporates a new participatory research program to address monitors’ concerns
(see Participatory
Research: Linking Citizens to Scientists
as
published in the EPA's Volunteer
Monitor Newsletter
for
more information). Also, NH LLMP volunteer monitoring and natural
resources inventories by stakeholder groups was used in the production
of Watershed Natural Resources Inventories which
were used for watershed planning and pollution prevention.
Volunteer
monitors associated with the Massachusetts
Water Resources Center
, University
of Massachusetts Extension
participated in the internationally recognized Acid
Rain Monitoring Project
.
Indicates
work supported by the USDA-CSREES National
Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program
.
The intent of this page is not to catalogue all activities but rather to indicate the types of research in the Watershed Management theme across the U.S.