|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115182130im_/http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/global-websites/images/bullets/local-link.gif) |
All Treesearch publications were written or produced by Forest Service personnel
and are in the public domain. |
|
US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090
(202) 205-8333 |
![USA.gov Government Made Easy](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115182130im_/http://www.fs.fed.us/wo-resources/images/usagov.gif)
|
|
Publication Information
Title:
| Relationships between Sitka black-tailed deer and their habitat. |
Author(s): |
Hanley, Thomas A. |
Date: |
1984 |
Source: |
Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-168. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 27 p |
Station ID: |
GTR-PNW-168 |
Description: |
Old-growth, western hemlock-Sitka spruce forest in southeastern Alaska is an important element of the habitat of Sitka black-tailed deer. The conversion of uneven-aged, old-growth forests to even-aged, second-growth forests has generated concern about the future carrying capacity of the habitat for deer, especially where snow accumulation is common on winter ranges. Even-aged, second-growth forests produce very little forage for black-tailed deer. Young(< 20 years), open stands produce greater amounts of forage than do old-growth stands. Snow accumulates to greater depths in openings than in forest, however, and forage becomes unavailable to deer as it is buried in snow. Habitat quality for Sitka black-tailed deer must be viewed as an energy benefit-cost relation. Energy intake decreases and energy expenditure increases as snow depth increases. Habitats differ in their canopy characteristics and in the amount and kind of forage they produce. The relative qualities of habitats shift with changing snow conditions. An understanding of these dynamic relationships between deer and their habitat is essential for developing management objectives for deer habitat. The current theory is largely qualitative and lacks the ability to yield unambiguous, quantitative predictions. Research is needed to quantify the key relationships between forest canopy and understory production and snow interception, and between the metabolic requirements of deer and the nutritional quality of available forage. |
Keywords: |
Wildlife habitat management, wildlife habitat, timber management, habitat selection, deer (black-tailed), Alaska (southeast) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115182130im_/http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/images/pdficonarrow.gif) |
View and Print this Publication (1.04 MB) |
Publication Notes: |
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
- You may send email to pubrequest@fs.f
ed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly
which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
|
![[ Get Acrobat ]](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115182130im_/http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/images/getacro.gif) |
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility |
|
Citation
Hanley, Thomas A. 1984. Relationships between Sitka black-tailed deer and their habitat.. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-168. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 27 p
|
|