PRINTER-FRIENDLY| Search Criteria Used (More) | |
Contracts to Contractors in Michigan 6 (Fred Upton)
(FY 2009)
Summary
Fiscal Year: 2009 1Q *  Total dollars: $168,893 This Congressional District is ranked 154 among districts for this year. Total number of contractors: 3 Total number of transactions: 36 Get list of contractors Get list of transactions Extent of Competition
|
 | Available for everyone for competition | $142,139 |
 | Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was recieved | $0 |
 | Competition within a limited pool | $13,442 |
 | Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed) | $0 |
 | Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities | $0 |
 | Not competed for an allowable reason | $13,312 |
 | Not identified, soon to be addressed | $0 |
Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed
| Michigan 6 (Fred Upton) | $155,581 |
| Illinois 7 (Danny K. Davis) | $13,312 |
Top 5 Products or Services Sold
| Paints, Dopes, Varnishes, and Related Products | $153,511 |
| Chaplain Services | $13,312 |
| Boxes, Cartons, and Crates | $2,070 |
Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)
| Federal Supply Service | $155,581 |
| VETERANS AFFAIRS, Department of | $13,312 |
Top 10 Contractors
| Ncp Coatings Inc | $153,511 |
| Saint Paul's Lutheran Church | $13,312 |
| Arvco Container Corporation | $2,070 |
| $0 |
Trend
| 2000 | $0 |
| 2001 | $0 |
| 2002 | $0 |
| 2003 | $0 |
| 2004 | $31,508,538 |
| 2005 | $31,847,432 |
| 2006 | $35,572,277 |
| 2007 | $43,144,585 |
| 2008 | $52,605,984 |
| 2009 1Q * | $168,893 |
*END OF REPORT*
This search was done on January 18, 2009.
The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.
Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.
The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.