Masthead: Home Link

Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

Contracts data was last updated on November 31, 2008 for all 24 CFO Act agencies at this time.

Assistance data was last updated on December 23, 2008 for 20 of 24 CFO act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies: DHS, HHS, NRC and TREAS.

For more details, please click here


Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in Massachusetts 9 (Stephen F. Lynch)
(FY 2006)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2006
Total dollars: $1,756,356,594
The amount for this search is 0.4% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This Congressional District is ranked 51 among districts for this year.
Total number of contractors: 478
Total number of transactions: 26,989
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$1,307,359,135
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was recieved$88,152,482
Competition within a limited pool$259,584,694
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$578,818
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$4,735,364
Not competed for an allowable reason$66,128,900
Not identified, soon to be addressed$29,817,200

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$116,048,771
Massachusetts 9 (Stephen F. Lynch)$87,389,450
Massachusetts 10 (William D. Delahunt)$38,429,634
Virginia 8 (James P. Moran)$15,501,216
Louisiana 2 (William J. Jefferson)$11,525,615

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Automatic Data Processing Equipment (Including Firmware), Software, Supplies and Support Equipment$601,122,283
Marine Charter for Things$384,073,657
Operation of Government-Owned Facilities -- Other Non-Building Facilities$117,831,618
Other ADP and Telecommunications Services (includes data storage on tapes, compact disks, etc.)$75,489,331
Digitizing Services. Includes cartographic and geographic information.$71,003,392

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$767,008,453
NAVY, Department of the$567,643,186
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$148,059,402
Washington Headquarters Services$71,018,057
U.S. Agency for International Development$38,161,793

Top 10 Contractors

General Dynamics Corporation$1,485,039,008
John Snow, Incorporated$38,137,503
Clean Harbors, Inc$25,770,716
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.$23,099,509
Mutual Telecom Services Inc.$11,688,331
Ultra Electronics Holdings PLC$11,021,576
Planners Collaborative, Inc.$8,643,788
Revere Paul Transportation LLC$6,300,069
Siemens AG$5,832,943
Metro Reliable Resources, Corp$5,794,083

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$0
2001$0
2002$0
2003$0
2004$1,081,600,918
2005$1,601,010,166
2006$1,756,356,594
2007$1,131,229,288
2008$509,328,400
2009 1Q * Partial year help link$254,417
*Note: FY 2009 only includes data for the first quarter.


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on January 18, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.