Masthead: Home Link

Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

Contracts data was last updated on November 31, 2008 for all 24 CFO Act agencies at this time.

Assistance data was last updated on December 23, 2008 for 20 of 24 CFO act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies: DHS, HHS, NRC and TREAS.

For more details, please click here


Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in California 29 (Adam B. Schiff)
(FY 2004)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2004
Total dollars: $11,936,483,856
The amount for this search is 3.5% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This Congressional District is ranked 2 among districts for this year.
Total number of contractors: 179
Total number of transactions: 4,030
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$495,706,443
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was recieved$36,987,427
Competition within a limited pool$313,374,002
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$367,069
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$13,803,504
Not competed for an allowable reason$11,072,405,112
Not identified, soon to be addressed$3,840,299

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

California 29 (Adam B. Schiff)$2,782,563,386
District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$35,022,389
Alaska At Large (Don Young)$22,470,745
South Dakota At Large (William J. Janklow)$15,444,244
Guam nonvoting (Madeleine Z. Bordallo)$2,569,789

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

Operation of Government-Owned Facilities -- Government-Owned Contractor-Operated (GOCO) R&D Facilities$6,892,186,072
Space Science and Applications -- Applied Research and Exploratory Development (R&D)$4,046,839,225
Other Professional Services$256,940,300
Hazardous Substance Removal, Cleanup, and Disposal Services and Operational Support$234,973,046
Architect - Engineer Services (including landscaping, interior layout, and designing)$78,703,136

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION$10,961,299,683
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$566,697,985
AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$150,251,256
ENERGY, Department of$73,866,289
STATE, Department of$66,254,157

Top 10 Contractors

California Institute of Technology$9,124,773,441
Government of The United States$1,834,005,805
The Parsons Corporation$418,528,057
Parsons Global Services Inc.$270,894,068
Inter-Con Security Systems Inc$66,011,603
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.$44,767,766
MWH Global, Inc.$39,185,476
Parson/Granite Joint Venture$18,533,059
Tetra Tech, Inc.$15,239,440
Nestl‚ S.A.$12,954,882

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$0
2001$0
2002$0
2003$0
2004$11,936,483,856
2005$4,176,698,569
2006$2,618,784,992
2007$2,473,724,330
2008$2,401,158,075
2009 1Q * Partial year help link$13,269
*Note: FY 2009 only includes data for the first quarter.


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on January 18, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.