US Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Southern Research Station

 
 

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

USA.gov  Government Made Easy

Publication Information

Title: Assessing the Non-Timber Value of Forests: A Revealed-Preference, Hedonic Model

Author: Scarpa, Riccardo; Buongiorno, Joseph; Hseu, Jiin-Shyang; Abt, Karen Lee

Date: 2000

Source: Journal of Forest Economics 6:2 2000

Description: Based on revealed preference theory, the value of non-timber goods and services obtained by forest owners, private or public, should be at least equal to the difference between the value of what they could have cut had they tried to maximize timber revenues, and of what they actually cut. This definition was applied to estimate the non-timber value (NTV) of Forest Inventory and Analysis plots in the Wisconsin maple-birch forest type, with a Markov decision model to predict the decision that would have maximized the timber income. Then hedonic regression was applied to determine how the biophysical characteristics of stands and the socioeconomic setting influenced NTV. In the Wisconsin maple-birch forests, the NTV was highest for national forests: about $50 ha-1yr-1, ten times the timber revenues. The estimated NTV was similar for all non-national forests, at about $20 to $24 ha-1yr-1. For non-national public forests, NTVs were four times larger than timber revenues. They were almost twice as large as timber revenues for private non-industrial forests. Even for industry forests, NTVs were slightly higher than timber revenues. However, these NTVs could be biased due to constraints limiting the potential economic return from forest stands not reflected by the profit-maximizing model. The hedonic pricing model showed that stands with the same tree distribution had significantly higher NTVs for national forests, and similar NTVs for other ownership types. The marginal value of trees of various species and size was also different for national forests. At constant prices, from 1966 to 1984, the non-timber value of maple-birch forests in Wisconsin increased by 30% for national forests, and 55% for other forests.

Keywords: amenity, Markov model, multiple use, opportunity cost, ownership, price, recreation, timber supply

View and Print this Publication (296 KB)

Pristine Version:  An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here:

View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (3.4 MB)

Publication Notes: 

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

Citation

Scarpa, Riccardo; Buongiorno, Joseph; Hseu, Jiin-Shyang; Abt, Karen Lee  2000.  Assessing the Non-Timber Value of Forests: A Revealed-Preference, Hedonic Model.   Journal of Forest Economics 6:2 2000

US Forest Service - Research & Development
Last Modified:  January 16, 2009


USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.