Southern Research Station

Title: Valuing soil conservation benefits of agroforestry: contour hedgerows in the Eastern Visayas, Philippines

Author: Patanayak, Subhrendu; Mercer, D. Evan

Date: 1998

Source: Agricultural Economics 18, 31-46

Description: Trecs can he considered as investments made by economic agents to prevent depreciation of natural assets such as stocks of top soil and water. In agroforestq systems farmers use trees in this manner by deliberately combining them with agricultural crops on the same unit of land. Although advocates of agroforestry have asserted that soil conservation is one of its primary henefits, empirical estimates of these benefits have bzen lacking due to temporal and spatial complexity of agroforestry systems and the nonrnarket aspect of soil capital assets. This study designs and applies a bio-economic framework for valuing the soil conservation benefits of agroforestr).. The framework is tested with econoxnetric analysis of data from surveys of households in Eastern Visayas, Philippines, where USAID/Govemment of Philippines introduced contour hedgerow agroforestry in 1983. By constructing a weighted soil quality index that also incorporates measures of soil fertility, texture and color in addition to erosion, we extend previous economic studies of soil resources. This index is regressed on a variety of farming and site specific hio-physical variables. Next, we use a Cobb-Douglas profit function to directly relate agricultural profits and soil quality. Thus, the value of soil conservation is measured as a quasi-rent differential or the share of producer surplus associated with a change in soil quality. Because this framework assumes the existence of markers, the assumption is tested by analysing the statistical significance of consumption side variahles, e.g., number of household members. on production side variables, e.g., profits. Instrumental variables are used to handle the endogeneity of the soil index in the profit equation. Seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) analysis is used to accommodate correlation of errors across the soil and profit equations. Regression results reveal the importance of agroforestry intensity, private ownership, land fragmentation, and familiarity with soil conservation as positive covariates of soil quality. Analysis of production data indicate the importance of market prices, education, farming experience, farni size, topography, and soil qualit) as positive covariates of household profits. Investments in agroforestry to improve or maintain soil capital can increased annual agricultural profits by US353 for the typical household, which is 6% of total income. However, there are significant up-front costs. Given that small farmers in tropical upfands are important players in the management of deteriorating soil and forest resources. policy makers may want to considcr supporting farmers in the early years of agroforestry adoption. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

Keywords: Agroforestry, contour hedgerows, soil conservation, bio-economic framework

View and Print this Publication (1.18 MB)

Pristine Version:  An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here:

View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (1.55 MB)

Publication Notes: 

• We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
• This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

 Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

Citation

Patanayak, Subhrendu; Mercer, D. Evan  1998.  Valuing soil conservation benefits of agroforestry: contour hedgerows in the Eastern Visayas, Philippines.   Agricultural Economics 18, 31-46