Southern Research Station

Title: Visually Determined Soil Disturbance Classes Used as Indices of Forest Harvesting Disturbance

Author: Aust, W. Michael; Burger, James A.; Carter, Emily A.; Preston, David P.; Patterson, Steven C.

Date: 1998

Source: SJAF 22(4) 1998

Description: Visual estimates of soil and site disturbances are used by foresters, soil scientists, logging supervisors. and machinery operators to minimize harvest disturbances to forest sites, to evaluate compliance with forestry Best Management Practices (BMPs), and to determine the need for ameliorative practices such as tnechanical site preparation. Although estimates are commonly used by field personnel, the actual relationships of visually determined soil disturbance classes to various soil physical properties and site characteristics have not been determined The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate if visually derermined soil disturbance classes ore related to quantitative soil end site properties that are known to influence soil productivity and hydro!ogic function. Several types of quantitative da;a were evaluated within the soil disturbance classes: static data (bulk density, saturated hydraulic conductivity, total, capillary, noncapillary pore space, and soil roughness) and dynamic data (mechanical resistance, volumetric soil moisture, subsurface water table depth). All data were collected from a long-term forest productivity study located in the Coastal Plain of South Carolina The study is a randomized complete block design with two harvest disturbance levels (wet-weather harvest vs. dry-weather harvest) and a maximum offive site soil disturbance (SD) classes. Disturbance classes included undisturbed (SDO), compressed but not rutted (SDI), rutted (SD2), deeply rutted (SD3). and churned (SD4). Analyses revealed that three static variables(soi1 bulkdensity, saturated hydraulicconductivity, mucropore pore space) and two dynamic variables (depth of the subsurface water tabk and mechanical resistance) were significantly related to disturbance. Although undisturbed and compressed areas generally were affected less than the more severe disturbance classes, the three most severe disturbance classes, churned areas, deeply rutted areas, and rutted areas were not different from one another. Thus, it appears visual disturbances do not necessarily equate to site damage. The overall implications are that visually determined soil disturbance classes have merit as indices of some soil and site changes, but they should not be equated to soil damage categories.

Keywords: 

View and Print this Publication (229 KB)

Pristine Version:  An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here:

View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (1.3 MB)

Publication Notes: 

• We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
• This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

 Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

Citation

Aust, W. Michael; Burger, James A.; Carter, Emily A.; Preston, David P.; Patterson, Steven C.   1998.  Visually Determined Soil Disturbance Classes Used as Indices of Forest Harvesting Disturbance.   SJAF 22(4) 1998