I have been a legal resident of the U.S. for 16 years. Earlier this month, I was denied permanent residency status. I only met 2 of the 3 criteria under the EB1-1 category. I had to apply under this category because my former employer, the federal government (I was a Title 42 fellow)was not allowed to petition under the EB1-2category, under which I would have qualified.
My American friends are upset that I was denied PR status. They want to know why a foreigner holding a PhD in the Sciences, and who has contributed to society is being denied status. They are especially angry that there is a Diversity Lottery Process that would bring in less educated foreigners, while kicking out those who have already assimilated with the local landscape.
I would like to urge DHHS to move to a point system (like Canada) where education, ability to speak English, assimilate with American society, etc are valued.
October 23, 2008 1:51 PM
Anonymous said...
I am a US citizen born and raised here in the US. I married overseas this summer and have since been learning about the immigration process the hard way. I married planning to bring my husband home with me. Boy was I wrong. Why do I have to wait in line alongside people who were not born here to wait for maybe a year, possibly longer, to be reunited with my husband? I'm finding that I dont have the rights that I assumed I had as a US citizen. I waited only a week for a visa to travel to his home country. The US embassy there would not let me apply for his visa there, and the journey began! It's just awful.
November 5, 2008 12:47 PM
[Photo] Earlier today I delivered the fourth of a series of regular updates regarding the state of immigration in our country. Rather than bombard you with a laundry list of metrics that indicate our progress, let me share just a few concrete examples.
This year, apprehensions of illegal immigrants along our southern border decreased 17 percent; last year, apprehensions decreased 20 percent – a clear indication of reduced crossing attempts. Remittances to Mexico and Latin America are also down for the year, another indicator of successful enforcement. Perhaps even more telling, a recent report from the Pew Hispanic Center found that for the first time in a decade, the flow of illegal immigrants into the United States dropped below the number of those legally entering the country. Pew also estimated that last year, for the first time since WW II, there was no increase in the number of illegal migrants in the U.S. Among the factors credited for this turnaround was "a heightened focus on enforcement of immigration laws."
By all indications – decreased apprehensions, remittances, and statistical data showing more legal than illegal immigrants – we are slowly but surely turning the tide of unchecked illegal immigration that has occurred for decades in our country. We’ve done this by adding more than 370 miles of fence to the border, nearly doubling the size of the Border Patrol, and deploying new technology. Through targeted interior enforcement actions, we've also identified and removed dangerous illegal alien gang members and fugitives in record numbers while sending an unambiguous message to employers who violate the law that we will not turn a blind eye toward illegality.
As part of this, we finalized our no-match regulation, which will give businesses clear guidance to respond to letters they may receive from the Social Security Administration notifying them that an employee's name and Social Security number doesn't match government records. This of course, could be the result of a simple clerical error; or it could indicate that the employee is working illegally – either way, this rule will give employers the guidance they need to respond appropriately and avoid legal ramifications.
My hope is that by re-establishing the government's credibility through these actions, we will not only begin to address one of our nation's greatest challenges, but we will leave a strong enforcement operation in place for the next Homeland Security Secretary to use as leverage to push Congress to comprehensively reform our nation's immigration laws. Until this happens, our country will never fully solve this problem.
2 Comments
Close this window Jump to comment formI have been a legal resident of the U.S. for 16 years. Earlier this month, I was denied permanent residency status. I only met 2 of the 3 criteria under the EB1-1 category. I had to apply under this category because my former employer, the federal government (I was a Title 42 fellow)was not allowed to petition under the EB1-2category, under which I would have qualified.
My American friends are upset that I was denied PR status. They want to know why a foreigner holding a PhD in the Sciences, and who has contributed to society is being denied status. They are especially angry that there is a Diversity Lottery Process that would bring in less educated foreigners, while kicking out those who have already assimilated with the local landscape.
I would like to urge DHHS to move to a point system (like Canada) where education, ability to speak English, assimilate with American society, etc are valued.
October 23, 2008 1:51 PM
I am a US citizen born and raised here in the US. I married overseas this summer and have since been learning about the immigration process the hard way. I married planning to bring my husband home with me. Boy was I wrong. Why do I have to wait in line alongside people who were not born here to wait for maybe a year, possibly longer, to be reunited with my husband? I'm finding that I dont have the rights that I assumed I had as a US citizen. I waited only a week for a visa to travel to his home country. The US embassy there would not let me apply for his visa there, and the journey began! It's just awful.
November 5, 2008 12:47 PM