USDA Economic Research Service Data Sets
" "  
Link: Bypass USDA Left navigation.
Search ERS

Browse by Subject
Diet, Health & Safety
Farm Economy
Farm Practices & Management
Food & Nutrition Assistance
Food Sector
Natural Resources & Environment
Policy Topics
Research & Productivity
Rural Economy
Trade and International Markets
Also Browse By


or

""

 


 
Data Sets

County-Level Population Data for Wyoming

Percent Change in Population, 2000-2007

The table is sorted in ascending order by FIPS code. Click a column title to sort by that column; click again to reverse the sort.

FIPS1County nameRUC code2Population 1990Population 2000Population 2007Change 1990-2000Change 2000-07
56001Albany County 430,79732,01432,2274.0%0.7%
56003Big Horn County 910,52511,46111,2638.9%-1.7%
56005Campbell County 529,37033,69840,43314.7%20.0%
56007Carbon County 716,65915,63915,486-6.1%-1.0%
56009Converse County 611,12812,05212,8688.3%6.8%
56011Crook County 95,2945,8876,28411.2%6.7%
56013Fremont County 733,66235,80437,4796.4%4.7%
56015Goshen County 712,37312,53811,9951.3%-4.3%
56017Hot Springs County 74,8094,8824,5531.5%-6.7%
56019Johnson County 76,1457,0758,14215.1%15.1%
56021Laramie County 373,14281,60786,35311.6%5.8%
56023Lincoln County 712,62514,57316,17115.4%11.0%
56025Natrona County 361,22666,53371,7508.7%7.8%
56027Niobrara County 92,4992,4072,262-3.7%-6.0%
56029Park County 723,17825,78627,07311.3%5.0%
56031Platte County 78,1458,8078,3968.1%-4.7%
56033Sheridan County 723,56226,56027,99812.7%5.4%
56035Sublette County 94,8435,9207,92522.2%33.9%
56037Sweetwater County 538,82337,61339,305-3.1%4.5%
56039Teton County 711,17318,25120,00263.3%9.6%
56041Uinta County 718,70519,74220,1955.5%2.3%
56043Washakie County 78,3888,2897,816-1.2%-5.7%
56045Weston County 76,5186,6446,8541.9%3.2%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1990 and 2000 Censuses of Population (corrected), and 2007 county estimate files.

1) The FIPS codes uniquely identify each county and are part of the Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce. For more information, see the NIST FIPS publication page.

2) The 2003 rural-urban continuum codes classify metropolitan counties (codes 1 through 3) by size of the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), and nonmetropolitan counties (codes 4 through 9) by degree of urbanization and proximity to metro areas. See rural-urban continuum codes for precise definitions of each code.

 

For more information, contact: Kathleen Kassel

Web administration: webadmin@ers.usda.gov

Updated date: March 21, 2008