USDA Economic Research Service Data Sets
" "  
Link: Bypass USDA Left navigation.
Search ERS

Browse by Subject
Diet, Health & Safety
Farm Economy
Farm Practices & Management
Food & Nutrition Assistance
Food Sector
Natural Resources & Environment
Policy Topics
Research & Productivity
Rural Economy
Trade and International Markets
Also Browse By


or

""

 


 
Data Sets

County-Level Population Data for Connecticut

Percent Change in Population, 2000-2007

The table is sorted in ascending order by FIPS code. Click a column title to sort by that column; click again to reverse the sort.

FIPS1County nameRUC code2Population 1990Population 2000Population 2007Change 1990-2000Change 2000-07
9001Fairfield County 2827,645882,567895,0156.6%1.4%
9003Hartford County 1851,783857,183876,8240.6%2.3%
9005Litchfield County 4174,092182,212188,2734.7%3.3%
9007Middlesex County 1143,196155,071164,1508.3%5.9%
9009New Haven County 2804,219824,008845,4942.5%2.6%
9011New London County 2254,957259,106267,3761.6%3.2%
9013Tolland County 1128,699136,364148,1396.0%8.6%
9015Windham County 4102,525109,091117,0386.4%7.3%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1990 and 2000 Censuses of Population (corrected), and 2007 county estimate files.

1) The FIPS codes uniquely identify each county and are part of the Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce. For more information, see the NIST FIPS publication page.

2) The 2003 rural-urban continuum codes classify metropolitan counties (codes 1 through 3) by size of the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), and nonmetropolitan counties (codes 4 through 9) by degree of urbanization and proximity to metro areas. See rural-urban continuum codes for precise definitions of each code.

 

For more information, contact: Kathleen Kassel

Web administration: webadmin@ers.usda.gov

Updated date: March 21, 2008