Nuclear Security: DOE's Office of the Under Secretary for Energy, Science, and Environment Needs to Take Prompt, Coordinated Action to Meet the New Design Basis Threat

GAO-05-611 July 15, 2005
Highlights Page (PDF)   Full Report (PDF, 45 pages)   Accessible Text   Recommendations (HTML)

Summary

A successful terrorist attack on a Department of Energy (DOE) site containing nuclear weapons material could have devastating effects for the site and nearby communities. DOE's Office of the Under Secretary for Energy, Science and Environment (ESE), which is responsible for DOE operations in areas such as energy research, manages five sites that contain weapons-grade nuclear material. A heavily armed paramilitary force equipped with such items as automatic weapons protects ESE sites. GAO was asked to examine (1) the extent to which ESE protective forces are meeting DOE's existing readiness requirements and (2) the actions DOE and ESE will need to take to successfully defend against the terrorist threat identified in the October 2004 design basis threat (DBT) by DOE's implementation deadline of October 2008.

Protective forces at the five ESE sites containing weapons-grade nuclear material generally meet existing key DOE readiness requirements. Specifically, GAO determined that ESE protective forces generally comply with DOE standards for firearms proficiency, physical fitness levels, and equipment standardization and that the five ESE sites had the required training programs, facilities, and equipment. However, GAO did find some weaknesses at ESE sites that could adversely affect the ability of ESE protective forces to defend their sites. For example, despite the importance of training exercises in which protective forces undergo simulated attacks by a group of mock terrorists (force-on-force exercises), DOE neither sets standards for individual protective force officers to participate in these exercises, nor does it require sites to track individual participation. In another example, GAO found that protective force officers at all five of the ESE sites reported problems with their radio communications systems. Specifically, according to 66 of the 105 protective force officers GAO interviewed, they did not always have dependable radio communications as required by the DOE Manual 473.2-2, Protective Force Program Manual. Security officials stated that improvements were under way. To successfully defend against the larger terrorist threat contained in the 2004 DBT by October 2008, DOE and ESE officials recognize that they will need to take several prompt and coordinated actions. These include transforming its current protective force into an "elite force"--modeled on U.S. Special Forces, developing and deploying new security technologies to reduce the risk to protective forces in case of an attack, consolidating and eliminating nuclear weapons material between and among ESE sites to reduce security costs, and creating a sound ESE management structure that has sufficient authority to ensure coordination across all ESE offices that have weapons-grade nuclear material. However, because these initiatives, particularly an elite force, are in early stages of development and will require significant commitment of resources and coordination across DOE and ESE, their completion by the 2008 October DBT implementation deadline is uncertain.



Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Implemented" or "Not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director:
Team:
Phone:
Eugene E. Aloise
Government Accountability Office: Natural Resources and Environment
(202) 512-6870


Recommendations for Executive Action


Recommendation: In order to ensure that DOE and ESE protective forces can meet the new terrorist threat contained in the 2004 DBT, the Secretary of Energy should develop a requirement for individual protective force officer participation in force-on-force exercises.

Agency Affected: Department of Energy

Status: Implemented

Comments: DOE agreed with this recommendation and stated that force-on-force testing requirements would be included in DOE's revised protective force policy. These requirements have been added to DOE Policy Manual,470.3-4, Protective Force, and are found in Chapter IV-12. This Manual was revised in March 2006 to reflect this change.

Recommendation: In order to ensure that DOE and ESE protective forces can meet the new terrorist threat contained in the 2004 DBT, the Secretary of Energy should require that sites track protective force member participation in force-on-force exercises.

Agency Affected: Department of Energy

Status: Implemented

Comments: DOE agreed with our recommendation to track protective force participation in force on force exercises. DOE included this requirement in DOE Manual 470.4-3, Chapter IV-12, in March 2006.

Recommendation: In order to ensure that DOE and ESE protective forces can meet the new terrorist threat contained in the 2004 DBT, the Secretary of Energy should take immediate action to correct weaknesses in protective force equipment at ESE sites by providing dependable radio communications, body armor, chemical protective gear, special response team capabilities, and vehicles that provide enhanced protection for protective forces where needed.

Agency Affected: Department of Energy

Status: In process

Comments: Checking on status

Recommendation: In order to ensure that DOE and ESE protective forces can meet the new terrorist threat contained in the 2004 DBT, the Secretary of Energy should develop and implement a departmentwide, multiyear, fully resourced implementation plan for meeting the new 2004 DBT requirements that includes detailed plans for the creation of an elite force through the revision of existing DOE protective force policies and practices, the development and deployment of enhanced security technologies, and the transportation and consolidation of special nuclear materials.

Agency Affected: Department of Energy

Status: In process

Comments: Checking on status

Recommendation: In order to ensure that DOE and ESE protective forces can meet the new terrorist threat contained in the 2004 DBT, the Secretary of Energy should require the Under Secretary, ESE, to establish a security organization to oversee the development, implementation, and coordination of ESE, and broader DOE efforts, to meet the 2004 DBT.

Agency Affected: Department of Energy

Status: In process

Comments: Checking with DOE on status