This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-06-735 
entitled 'Immigration Benefits: Circumstances under Which Petitioners' 
Sex Offenses May Be Disclosed to Beneficiaries' which was released on 
June 14, 2006. 

This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part 
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every 
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of 
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text 
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the 
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided 
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed 
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic 
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail 
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this 
document to Webmaster@gao.gov. 

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately. 

Report to the Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims, 
Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives: 

United States Government Accountability Office: 

GAO: 

June 2006: 

Immigration Benefits: 

Circumstances under Which Petitioners' Sex Offenses May Be Disclosed to 
Beneficiaries: 

Immigration Benefits: 

GAO-06-735: 

GAO Highlights: 

Highlights of GAO-06-735, a report to the Subcommittee on Immigration, 
Border Security, and Claims, Committee on the Judiciary, House of 
Representatives. 

Why GAO Did This Study: 

In fiscal year 2005, U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents filed 
about 730,000 petitions with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration 
Services (USCIS) to sponsor noncitizen family members, including 
spouses, fiancé(e)s, and children, to immigrate to the United States. 
Those doing the sponsoring are called petitioners; those benefiting 
from the sponsoring are called beneficiaries. If USCIS approves the 
petition, overseas beneficiaries must also file a visa application with 
the Department of State to enter the United States. In January 2002, 
USCIS started to conduct background security checks on all petitioners 
in addition to the beneficiaries. These background checks revealed that 
some of the petitioners had convictions for criminal sex offenses; 
further, some of those criminal sex offenders were filing family-based 
petitions for children (those under the age of 21). This report 
addresses the number of convicted sex offenders who filed family-based 
petitions in fiscal year 2005 based upon a computer match of USCIS data 
with individuals in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s National Sex 
Offender Registry and discusses USCIS’s and the Department of State’s 
framework for disclosing a sponsor’s criminal sexual background to the 
beneficiary. DHS, the Department of State, and the Department of 
Justice reviewed a draft of this report. Only technical comments were 
provided and have been incorporated into this report. 

What GAO Found: 

At least 398 convicted sex offenders filed a total of 420 petitions in 
fiscal year 2005 for spouses, fiancé(e)s, children, and other 
relatives. Immigration law does not prohibit convicted sex offenders 
from petitioning to bring their spouses, fiancé(e)s, or children into 
the United States and generally USCIS cannot deny a petition based 
solely on the fact that the petitioner is a convicted sex offender. The 
sex offenders were convicted of at least 411 sex-related crimes, 
including sexual assault and rape, according to data in the Federal 
Bureau of Investigation’s National Sex Offender Registry. At least 45 
convictions involved crimes against children. While most beneficiaries 
were spouses and fiancé(e)s, criminal sex offenders petitioned for at 
least 60 children. 

According to USCIS and Department of State officials, an exception to 
the Privacy Act of 1974 gives them authority to disclose a petitioner’s 
criminal sex offender history if there are “compelling circumstances 
affecting the health and safety” of the beneficiary. For certain 
noncitizen beneficiaries, disclosure of the petitioner’s criminal 
background information is now mandatory based on new authority granted 
to USCIS and the Department of State. The International Marriage Broker 
Regulation Act of 2005 (IMBRA) requires disclosure of a U.S. citizen’s 
criminal background information, including sex crimes, to certain 
prospective immigrants, essentially noncitizen fiancé(e)s, but some 
spouses and minor children as well. Mandatory disclosure is not 
required for beneficiaries not covered by IMBRA, though these 
beneficiaries may receive information about a petitioner’s criminal 
background on a discretionary basis under the Privacy Act exception. 
GAO estimates that IMBRA’s mandatory disclosure requirement will cover 
about 20 percent of family-based beneficiaries based on fiscal year 
2005 data. On May 3, 2006, USCIS issued interim guidance to its 
adjudicators on when it may be appropriate to disclose information 
related to a petitioner’s criminal history under the “compelling 
circumstances” exception to the Privacy Act. USCIS plans to issue 
separate guidance related to disclosure requirements under IMBRA. 
Department of State officials said that they are preparing to issue 
Privacy Act disclosure guidance and are finalizing separate IMBRA 
disclosure guidance. 

Figure: Petitioners’ Sex Offense Convictions: 

[See PDF for Image] 

[End of Figure] 

[Hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-06-735]. 

To view the full product, including the scope and methodology, click on 
the link above. For more information, contact Paul Jones at (202) 512-
8777 or jonespl@gao.gov. 

[End of Section] 

Contents: 

Letter: 

Results in Brief: 

Background: 

Hundreds of Convicted Sex Offenders Have Petitioned for Spouses, 
Fiancé(e)s, and other Relatives, including Children: 

Agencies Have a Framework for Disclosing Petitioners' Criminal Sexual 
History to Noncitizen Beneficiaries: 

Concluding Observations: 

Agency Comments and Our Evaluation: 

Appendix I: Scope and Methodology: 

Appendix II: GAO Contact and Staff Aknowledgments: 

Table: 

Table 1: Conviction Descriptions of 411 Sex Offenses Committed by the 
398 Sex Offenders: 

Figures: 

Figure 1: Primary Beneficiaries Petitioned For by Convicted Sex 
Offenders in Fiscal Year 2005: 

Figure 2: Status of Petitions Filed by Convicted Sex Offenders: 

Abbreviations: 

DHS: Department of Homeland Security: 
FBI: Federal Bureau of Investigation: 
FDU: Fraud Detection Unit: 
IMBRA: International Marriage Broker Regulation Act: 
IBIS: Interagency Border Inspection System: 
INA: Immigration and Nationality Act: 
INS: Immigration and Naturalization Service: 
NCIC: National Crime Information Center: 
NSOR: National Sex Offender Registry: 
USCIS: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services: 

United States Government Accountability Office: 

Washington, DC 20548: 

June 14, 2006: 

The Honorable John N. Hostettler: 
Chairman: 
The Honorable Sheila Jackson Lee: 
Ranking Minority Member: 
Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims: 
Committee on the Judiciary: 
House of Representatives: 

A U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, called the sponsor or 
petitioner, can file a petition with the U.S. Citizenship and 
Immigration Services (USCIS), within the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS), to have noncitizen relatives, such as spouses or 
children, immigrate to the United States. In addition, U.S. citizens, 
but not lawful permanent residents, can petition for noncitizen 
fiancé(e)s and their children. If USCIS approves the petition, the 
noncitizen relative or fiancé(e), called the beneficiary, can then 
apply to enter or remain in the United States. If the beneficiary is 
overseas, the Department of State is responsible for determining 
whether to issue a visa. If the beneficiary is already in the United 
States in a nonimmigrant status, such as a visitor or student, he or 
she would apply to USCIS to change his/her status to that of lawful 
permanent resident. In fiscal year 2005, approximately 730,000 family- 
based petitions were filed with USCIS.[Footnote 1] Among those filing 
family-based petitions were convicted sex offenders. The Immigration 
and Nationality Act does not prohibit convicted sex offenders from 
petitioning to bring their fiancé(e)s, spouses, or children into the 
United States, and their petitions may be approved despite their 
criminal sexual history. USCIS does not have general authority to deny 
a petition based solely on the fact that a petitioner may be a 
convicted sex offender. In cases where there is no other basis for 
denying a petition, USCIS or the State Department may be faced with the 
issue of whether, and under what circumstances, they can disclose the 
petitioner's criminal sexual history to a beneficiary consistent with 
any applicable privacy restrictions. 

Prior to September 11, 2001, the Immigration and Naturalization Service 
(INS), USCIS's predecessor, conducted background security checks on all 
beneficiaries applying to immigrate to the United States. In January 
2002, INS instituted mandatory background checks on all beneficiaries 
and petitioners for all immigration benefits, including U.S. citizen 
petitioners. USCIS continues to conduct these checks. While these 
background checks were primarily instituted for national security and 
public safety reasons, such as identifying terrorists or terrorist 
threats, the checks revealed that some petitioners had criminal 
convictions, including convictions for criminal sex offenses. Some of 
these petitioners had petitioned for minor children, which the 
Immigration and Nationality Act generally defines as an unmarried child 
under 21 years old.[Footnote 2] 

You asked us to determine the number of convicted sex offenders who 
filed family-based petitions, and in particular petitions for children. 
You also expressed interest in understanding the circumstances 
surrounding possible disclosure of a petitioner's criminal sex offender 
history to the noncitizen beneficiary. This report addresses the 
following: 

* the number of convicted sex offenders who filed family-based 
petitions in fiscal year 2005, and: 

* USCIS's and Department of State's framework for disclosing a 
sponsor's criminal sexual background to the noncitizen beneficiary. 

To determine how many convicted sex offenders filed family-based 
petitions in fiscal year 2005, we conducted a computer match using data 
from USCIS's family-based petitions filed in fiscal year 2005 with data 
on individuals listed in the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) 
National Crime Information Center's (NCIC) National Sex Offender 
Registry (NSOR). The NSOR is a national database that compiles data 
furnished by the states from their sex offender registries. As of 
December 2005, the NSOR contained data on approximately 413,000 sex 
offenders. The FBI is required by federal law to maintain this registry 
to track the whereabouts and movement of convicted sex offenders who 
have been (1) convicted of a criminal offense against a victim who is a 
minor, (2) convicted of a sexually violent offense, or (3) who are 
"sexually violent predators."[Footnote 3] We matched several data 
elements that were the same in both data sets, such as name, date of 
birth, or Social Security number, to provide a high level of assurance 
that the petitioner in the USCIS database was the same person as the 
sex offender in the NSOR. We determined that the data we used from the 
USCIS database and the NSOR were sufficiently reliable for the purposes 
of this report. Appendix I contains a more detailed description of the 
scope and methodology of our computer match, including the data- 
matching criteria we used to decide whether the petitioner in the USCIS 
database was a match with the sex offender in the NSOR. 

To determine USCIS's and the Department of State's framework for 
disclosing a sponsor's criminal sexual background to the noncitizen 
beneficiary, we reviewed relevant laws, including the International 
Marriage Broker Regulation Act (IMBRA) of 2005, the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, and the Privacy Act of 1974, as well as relevant 
regulations and policy guidelines. We also interviewed USCIS and 
Department of State officials and obtained each agency's written 
position regarding the scope of its authority to disclose a 
petitioner's criminal sex offender history to a beneficiary. We 
conducted our work from August 2005 through June 2006 in accordance 
with generally accepted government auditing standards. 

Results in Brief: 

At least 398 convicted sex offenders filed petitions for spouses, 
fiancé(e)s, children (those under the age of 21), and other relatives 
in fiscal year 2005. They filed a total of 420 of the approximately 
730,000 family-based petitions filed in fiscal year 2005. While most of 
the beneficiaries were spouses and fiancé(e)s, we determined that at 
least 60 were unmarried children under 21. Fourteen of the 398 sex 
offender petitioners were classified in the FBI's NSOR as sexually 
violent predators, defined in federal law as offenders who have been 
convicted of a sexually violent offense and are likely to engage in 
predatory sexually violent offenses again. At least 3 of the 14 sexual 
predators had filed petitions for children. 

According to USCIS and Department of State officials, an exception to 
the Privacy Act of 1974 gives them authority to disclose a petitioner's 
criminal sexual history if there are "compelling circumstances 
affecting the health and safety" of the beneficiary. For certain 
noncitizen beneficiaries, disclosure of the petitioner's criminal 
background information is mandatory based on new authority granted to 
USCIS and the Department of State. IMBRA requires disclosure of a U.S. 
citizen's criminal background information, including sex crimes, to 
certain prospective immigrants, essentially noncitizen fiancé(e)s, but 
some spouses and children as well. Mandatory disclosure is not required 
for beneficiaries not covered by IMBRA, though they may receive 
information about a petitioner's criminal background on a discretionary 
basis under the Privacy Act exception. We estimate that IMBRA's 
mandatory disclosure requirement will cover about 20 percent of family- 
based beneficiaries based on fiscal year 2005 data. On May 3, 2006, 
USCIS issued interim guidance to its adjudicators[Footnote 4] on when 
it may be appropriate to disclose information related to a petitioner's 
criminal background information under the "compelling circumstances" 
exception to the Privacy Act. This guidance also stated that USCIS will 
issue separate guidance related to disclosure requirements under IMBRA. 
The Department of State said that it is preparing to issue guidance 
related to its discretionary disclosure authority under the Privacy Act 
and plans to issue separate disclosure guidance with respect to 
disclosure requirements under IMBRA. 

We provided a draft of this report to DHS, the Department of State, and 
the Attorney General for review. Only technical comments were provided, 
which we incorporated into our report as appropriate. 

Background: 

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as amended, is the primary 
body of law governing immigration and visa operations. Among other 
things, the INA defines the powers given to the Secretaries of State 
and Homeland Security[Footnote 5] and the consular and immigration 
officers who serve under them, delineates categories of and 
qualifications for immigrant and nonimmigrant visas, and provides a 
broad framework of operations through which foreign citizens are 
allowed to enter and immigrate to the United States. USCIS is generally 
responsible for administering the citizenship and immigration services 
of the United States. Most foreign nationals living abroad who wish to 
immigrate to the United States must obtain a visa through the 
Department of State's Bureau of Consular Affairs. 

U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents, that is, petitioners, can 
request or petition USCIS to allow certain relatives to immigrate to 
the United States. As the first step in a two step process, petitioners 
must file a family-based petition with USCIS. U.S. citizens and lawful 
permanent residents may file a Form I-130 for an alien relative, such 
as a wife or child, to immigrate to the United States. U.S. citizens 
(but not lawful permanent residents) may also petition to bring a 
noncitizen fiancé(e) to the United States by filing a Form I-129F with 
USCIS.[Footnote 6] The I-129F or I-130 petitions may also list 
"derivative beneficiaries," such as the beneficiary's unmarried child 
under 21 years old, who are eligible to immigrate with the primary 
beneficiary. The purpose of these petitions is to establish the 
petitioner's relationship to the family member or fiancé(e) who wishes 
to immigrate to the United States. USCIS adjudicators are to review 
petitions and make determinations, in accordance with immigration law, 
on whether to approve or deny petitions. If a petition is approved, the 
second step in the process is to determine whether the noncitizen is 
admissible under immigration law to enter or remain in the United 
States. If the noncitizen is overseas, USCIS will send the approved 
petition to the State Department and a State Department consular 
officer will determine whether to issue a visa to the noncitizen. If 
the noncitizen is already in the United States in a nonimmigrant 
status, such as a visitor or student, when the petition is approved, a 
USCIS adjudicator will determine whether to allow the noncitizen to 
change, or "adjust," his/her status to that of a lawful permanent 
resident. 

As part of its review, USCIS conducts background security checks on 
petitioners as well as noncitizen beneficiaries. These background 
checks were instituted for national security purposes such as 
identifying terrorists or terrorist threats, and for public safety 
reasons, such as identifying human rights violators or aggravated 
felons. According to USCIS officials, background security checks were 
conducted on all beneficiaries prior to September 11. As of January 
2002, however, background security checks were required to be conducted 
on all petitioners, including U.S. citizens, as well as beneficiaries. 

USCIS adjudicators conduct background security checks using the 
Interagency Border Inspection System (IBIS), which is a multi-agency 
computer system of lookouts for terrorists, drug traffickers, and other 
such criminal types. IBIS contains numerous database files and 
interfaces with sources such as the FBI's National Crime Information 
Center.[Footnote 7] The NCIC contains various data, including data on 
violent gangs and terrorists, immigration violators, and the National 
Sex Offender Registry. During a background check, if an IBIS query 
returns a "hit" where the name and date of birth information entered 
returns a positive response from one or more of the databases, and it 
appears the petitioner may have a criminal background, USCIS 
adjudicators are to forward this information to a Fraud Detection and 
National Security (FDNS) officer within USCIS. FDNS officers are to 
conduct further system searches for verification of the criminal hits. 
After researching and summarizing the criminal data on the petitioner, 
FDNS officers are to notate their findings in a resolution memorandum 
and send the memo back to the adjudicator responsible for the file. 
Assuming the petitioner cannot be referred to law enforcement or, in 
the case of a lawful permanent resident, deported, the adjudicator then 
continues the review and accepts or denies the petition based on 
whether there appears to be a valid relationship between the petitioner 
and the beneficiary. 

The FBI NCIC NSOR is a compilation of state registration information 
about sex offenders. The NSOR is statutorily mandated by the Pam 
Lychner Sexual Offender Tracking and Identification Act of 
1996.[Footnote 8] The act directs the Attorney General to establish a 
national database at the FBI to track the whereabouts and movement of 
(1) each person who has been convicted of a "criminal offense against a 
victim who is a minor," (2) each person who has been convicted of a 
"sexually violent offense," and (3) each person who is determined to be 
a "sexually violent predator." As implemented, the NSOR is a nationwide 
system that links states' sex offender registration and notification 
programs. Each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia has 
created a sex offender registry based on the above three conviction 
categories and has established an interface with the FBI's national 
system in order to transmit state registry information to the national 
registry. State registries contain information on sex offenders who are 
required to register and that reside, work, or attend school within the 
state. 

Hundreds of Convicted Sex Offenders Have Petitioned for Spouses, 
Fiancé(e)s, and other Relatives, including Children: 

At least 398 convicted sex offenders filed petitions for spouses, 
fiancé(e)s, children, and other relatives in fiscal year 2005 based 
upon matching several data elements from USCIS's database with data 
from FBI's National Sex Offender Registry. There may be additional 
convicted sex offenders who filed family-based petitions. For example, 
we could not determine with a high degree of confidence whether 53 
petitioners that had the same name and date of birth as a person in the 
NSOR were the same individuals because there were no additional data 
items, such as Social Security number or address, that we could match. 
Therefore, we did not include these additional 53 petitioners in our 
count because it is possible that two people could have the same name 
and date of birth. 

The 398 sex offenders filed a total of 420 petitions. Figure 1 shows 
the type of beneficiaries for which petitions were filed by convicted 
sex offenders. USCIS data indicate that 371 (88 percent) of the 
beneficiaries were spouses and fiancé(e)s, 33 (8 percent) were 
unmarried children under 21 years old, and 16 (4 percent) were 
classified as other relatives. We do not know, however, what percentage 
of unmarried children under 21 years old were minors under the federal 
criminal code, which defines a minor as under 18 years old for purposes 
of certain child sexual offenses.[Footnote 9] In addition, certain 
relatives of the primary beneficiary, such as unmarried children, under 
21 years old, of the noncitizen spouse or fiancé(e), called derivative 
beneficiaries, may also immigrate with the beneficiary. However, 
USCIS's data system only includes information on the primary 
beneficiary, not on any derivative beneficiaries. Therefore, our data 
underestimate the actual number of beneficiaries. For example, in 
addition to the 33 unmarried children under 21 years of age that were 
the primary beneficiaries of sex offenders, the State Department 
provided us data from its visa processing system indicating that there 
were at least an additional 27 children who were derivative 
beneficiaries associated with fiancé(e) petitions. Both USCIS and State 
Department data together total at least 60 unmarried children under 21 
years of age. 

Figure 1: Primary Beneficiaries Petitioned For by Convicted Sex 
Offenders in Fiscal Year 2005: 

[See PDF for image] 

Note: Total does not equal 100 percent because of rounding. As of 
December 2005, the majority, or about 62 percent, of the petitions 
filed in fiscal year 2005 for noncitizen relatives--spouses, children, 
and other relatives--by petitioners with criminal sex offender 
backgrounds were still pending a decision; about 37 percent had been 
approved, and 1 percent had been denied. Most, or approximately 75 
percent of, petitions filed by criminal sex offenders for fiancé(e)s 
had been approved (see fig. 2). 

[End of figure] 

Figure 2: Status of Petitions Filed by Convicted Sex Offenders: 

[See PDF for image] 

[End of figure] 

As shown in table 1, some of the sex offenders have been convicted of 
multiple sex crimes. The 398 sex offenders were convicted of at least 
411 sex offenses, including sexual assault, rape, and child 
molestation, according to conviction data contained in the NSOR. At 
least 45 of the convictions were for sex offenses against 
children.[Footnote 10] It is possible that more than 45 convictions 
involved sex offenses against children, but this number could not be 
determined based on the conviction description in the registry. For 
example, the conviction description for 217 of the 411 convictions, or 
53 percent, is "sex offense." In addition, 14 petitioners were 
classified as sexual predators. Consistent with statute,[Footnote 11] 
the NSOR classifies "sexual predator" as an offender who has been 
convicted of a sexually violent offense and suffers from a mental 
abnormality or personality disorder that makes the person likely to 
engage in predatory sexually violent offenses again. These 14 sexual 
predators filed a total of 17 petitions. As of December 2005, 9 of the 
17 petitions filed were approved and 8 were pending. Three of the 14 
petitioners who were classified as sexual predators filed for unmarried 
children under 21 years old. 

Table 1: Conviction Descriptions of 411 Sex Offenses Committed by the 
398 Sex Offenders: 

Conviction description: Sex offense; 
Total: 217. 

Conviction description: Sex assault; 
Total: 119. 

Conviction description: Sex offense-child fondling; 
Total: 35. 

Conviction description: Rape-strong arm; 
Total: 9. 

Conviction description: Sexual Assault-carnal abuse; 
Total: 9. 

Conviction description: Statutory rape-no force; 
Total: 7. 

Conviction description: Crimes against persons; 
Total: 4. 

Conviction description: Indecent exposure; 
Total: 3. 

Conviction description: Kidnapping; 
Total: 2. 

Conviction description: Obscene material possession; 
Total: 2. 

Conviction description: Sovereignty (restrict movement); 
Total: 1. 

Conviction description: Sex assault-sodomy boy; 
Total: 1. 

Conviction description: Incest with minor; 
Total: 1. 

Conviction description: Exploitation minor-photograph; 
Total: 1. 

Conviction description: Total; 
Total: 411. 

Source: GAO analysis of USCIS and FBI data. 

Note: Thirteen sex offenders had more than one conviction in the NSOR. 

[End of table] 

Convicted sex offenders are not prohibited by the INA from petitioning 
to bring their spouses, fiancé(e)s, or children into the United States. 
According to USCIS and the Department of State, neither agency has 
general authority to deny a petition or visa based solely on the fact 
that a petitioner may be a convicted sex offender. In a December 2005 
letter to GAO, USCIS's Acting Chief Counsel stated that USCIS may not 
reject or deny family-based petitions on the grounds that the 
petitioner has a criminal background, lacks good moral character, or 
other possible negative factors.[Footnote 12] The review and ultimately 
the approval of such petitions centers on whether the facts stated in 
the petition are true and whether there exists the requisite 
relationship between the petitioner and the beneficiary. It is possible 
that a petitioner's criminal history may be relevant to the question of 
whether the petitioner has established the requisite relationship. For 
example, a petitioner's conviction for fraud, bigamy, or alien 
smuggling would be relevant in determining whether a bona fide 
relationship exists between the petitioner and a noncitizen spouse 
beneficiary. 

According to officials in the Department of State's Bureau of Consular 
Affairs, the Department of State cannot deny a visa to a noncitizen 
based solely on the fact that the petitioner is a convicted sex 
offender or has other criminal convictions. The review and ultimately 
the approval of a visa centers on whether the noncitizen is admissible 
under immigration law to enter the United States and on whether there 
exists the prerequisite relationship between the petitioner and the 
beneficiary. Therefore, consular officers have no legal basis to deny a 
visa to a noncitizen based solely on the fact that the petitioner has a 
criminal sexual background. In cases where there is no basis for 
denying a petition or visa, both the State Department and USCIS may be 
faced with the issue of whether, and under what circumstances, they can 
disclose the petitioner's criminal sexual history to a beneficiary 
consistent with any applicable privacy restrictions. 

Agencies Have a Framework for Disclosing Petitioners' Criminal Sexual 
History to Noncitizen Beneficiaries: 

According to both USCIS and Department of State officials, the 
compelling circumstances exception to the Privacy Act of 1974 provides 
authority to disclose a petitioner's criminal sexual history to a 
noncitizen beneficiary on a case-by-case basis. For certain noncitizen 
beneficiaries, disclosure of the petitioner's criminal background 
information is mandatory based on new authority granted to USCIS and 
the Department of State. The recently enacted International Marriage 
Broker Regulation Act (IMBRA) of 2005[Footnote 13] requires disclosure 
of a U.S. citizen's criminal background information, including sex 
crimes, to certain prospective immigrants, essentially noncitizen 
fiancé(e)s, but some spouses and children as well. USCIS must furnish 
this criminal background information to the Department of State for 
purposes of making IMBRA disclosures. On May 3, 2006, USCIS officials 
issued interim guidance to its adjudicators on making disclosures under 
the compelling circumstances exception to the Privacy Act and stated 
that USCIS would soon issue additional guidance with respect to IMBRA 
disclosures. The Department of State informed us that it is preparing 
to issue disclosure guidance to consular officers that will cover 
discretionary Privacy Act disclosures and that it is finalizing 
separate disclosure guidance with respect to the mandatory disclosures 
required under IMBRA, but this guidance cannot be issued until USCIS 
finalizes its IMBRA related procedures. 

USCIS and the Department of State May Disclose a Petitioner's Criminal 
Sexual History to a Noncitizen Beneficiary Based on Their 
Interpretation of a Privacy Act Exception: 

The Privacy Act of 1974 states that, "no agency shall disclose any 
record which is contained in a system of records by any means of 
communication to any person, or to another agency, except pursuant to a 
written request by, or with the prior written consent of, the 
individual to whom the record pertains."[Footnote 14] While information 
from the covered systems is generally not to be disclosed, there are 12 
exceptions. One of these exceptions authorizes an agency to make a 
disclosure "to a person pursuant to a showing of compelling 
circumstances affecting the health or safety of an individual if upon 
such disclosure notification is transmitted to the last known address 
of such individual." Both USCIS and the Department of State have 
interpreted the compelling circumstances exception in the Privacy Act 
as authority to permit the disclosure of a petitioner's criminal sexual 
history information. 

In a December 2005 letter to GAO, USCIS's Acting Chief Counsel stated 
that if USCIS learns that a petitioner has a substantiated history of 
sexual assault or child molestation, then USCIS has the discretion in 
compelling circumstances to disclose that information to the 
beneficiary. On May 3, 2006, USCIS issued Privacy Act interim guidance 
advising adjudicators of when it may be appropriate to disclose a 
petitioner's criminal history involving violence or sex offenses to 
potential visa beneficiaries under the compelling circumstances 
exception. Generally, disclosure is limited to those portions of the 
petitioner's criminal history involving violence or sex offenses that 
are directly relevant to the "health and safety" of the potential 
beneficiary. As an example, the guidance provides that normally, "a 
conviction as a sexual predator should be considered a compelling 
circumstance affecting the health and safety of a child who would 
reside with the sexual predator." The guidance further states that any 
concerns about safety that adjudicators have that are outside the scope 
of the guidance should be brought to the attention of their supervisor. 

According to Department of State officials, protecting the health or 
safety of a minor child would constitute compelling circumstances to 
disclose a petitioner's criminal sex offender background, though the 
exception might also apply in cases that did not involve a minor child. 
In a letter to GAO, the Chief, Advisory Opinions Branch, of the 
Department of State's Visa Office wrote, "the clear possibility of 
abuse that an immigrant child would face while living in the same 
household as a convicted sex offender provides a strong basis for 
applying the health and safety exception in these cases." The 
Department of State asserts that its position is "consistent with 
overall U.S. policy balancing the need to inform the public of the 
potential threat to a community posed by a child sex offender with the 
privacy interests of the offender." According to the Department, 
consular officials are to consult with the department's visa policy and 
legal staff prior to disclosure of a criminal record or other negative 
factors. 

New Statute Requires Disclosure of Petitioner's Criminal Background 
Information to Some Noncitizen Beneficiaries: 

For certain noncitizen beneficiaries, disclosure of the petitioner's 
criminal background information is now mandatory based on new authority 
granted to USCIS and the Department of State. The recently enacted 
International Marriage Broker Regulation Act of 2005 requires 
disclosure of a U.S. citizen's criminal background information, 
including sex crimes, to certain prospective immigrants, essentially 
noncitizen fiancé(e)s, but also some spouses and children (i.e., 
unmarried children under 21 years old who are derivatives of the 
primary beneficiary). 

IMBRA mandates disclosure of a U.S. citizen's criminal history, 
including sex crimes, to certain prospective immigrants known as K 
nonimmigrant visa applicants,[Footnote 15] who are essentially 
noncitizen fiancé(e)s, but also some spouses and children. Obtaining a 
K visa allows the fiancé(e), spouse, or child to enter the United 
States as a nonimmigrant and then apply for immigrant (i.e., lawful 
permanent resident) status while in this country. Under section 832 of 
IMBRA, USCIS must revise its I-129F petition to require petitioners to 
disclose criminal background information for numerous specified crimes, 
including domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse and neglect, 
and incest.[Footnote 16] Any criminal background information USCIS 
possesses with respect to the petitioner must accompany any approved 
petition that is forwarded to the Department of State.[Footnote 17] 
IMBRA goes on to provide: "The Secretary of State, in turn, shall share 
any such criminal background information that is in government records 
or databases with the K nonimmigrant visa applicant who is the 
beneficiary of the petition. The visa applicant shall be informed that 
such criminal background information is based on available records and 
may not be complete."[Footnote 18] To effectuate IMBRA's mandatory 
disclosure requirement, the Department of State must mail the visa 
applicant a copy of the petition, including any criminal background 
information, as well as a government-developed domestic violence 
information pamphlet.[Footnote 19] Supplementing the disclosure by 
mail, IMBRA also requires Department of State consular officers to 
"provide for the disclosure of such criminal background information to 
the visa applicant at the consular interview in the primary language of 
the visa applicant."[Footnote 20] 

IMBRA's mandatory disclosure requirement only extends to fiancé(e)s, 
spouses, and their minor children (i.e., unmarried children under 21 
years old), who are sponsored by U.S. citizens and enter the United 
States on a K nonimmigrant visa issued by the Department of State. 
IMBRA's mandatory disclosure requirement does not cover (1) the spouses 
and minor children of lawful permanent residents, who do not have the 
option of entering the United States using a K visa; (2) the spouses 
and minor children of U.S. citizens who enter the United States on an 
immigrant visa; or (3) any noncitizen already in the United States 
applying directly to USCIS for immigrant status.[Footnote 21] According 
to the data we reviewed, most noncitizens entering under family-based 
petitions will not be covered by IMBRA's mandatory disclosure 
requirement. In fiscal year 2005, about 80 percent of all family-based 
petitions filed were for other than K visas. 

USCIS and Department of State Efforts to Issue Disclosure Guidance: 

USCIS issued interim guidance related to Privacy Act disclosures on May 
3, 2006. The guidance advises adjudicators of when "compelling 
circumstances" may exist to disclose a petitioner's criminal history 
involving violence or sex offenses: for example, protecting the health 
and safety of a child beneficiary who would reside with a sexual 
predator would normally constitute a compelling circumstance to make a 
disclosure. The guidance states that disclosure should be limited only 
to those portions of the petitioner's criminal history that are 
directly relevant to the health and safety of the potential 
beneficiary. The guidance also contains Privacy Act procedures that 
adjudicators must follow when they make a disclosure, such as providing 
written notice of the disclosure to the petitioner and annotating the 
USCIS file to maintain a record of the disclosure and the justification 
for it. When the beneficiary is within USCIS's jurisdiction, the 
guidance informs adjudicators to make disclosures during in-person 
interviews with the beneficiary. When the beneficiary is abroad, the 
guidance requires the adjudicator to provide to the State Department 
any adverse information that might affect the health or safety of a 
beneficiary to enable the State Department to make a decision regarding 
disclosure. 

USCIS's interim guidance related to Privacy Act disclosure states that 
USCIS will issue separate guidance addressing the special procedures 
adjudicators must follow with respect to I-129F petitions. As 
previously discussed, to meet IMBRA requirements, USCIS must revise its 
I-129F petition to require petitioners to disclose criminal background 
information for numerous specified crimes, including sex offenses. Any 
criminal background information USCIS possesses with respect to the 
petitioner must accompany any approved petition that is forwarded to 
the State Department to enable the State Department to effectuate 
IMBRA's mandatory disclosure requirement. IMBRA mandated that USCIS 
revise its I-129F petition by March 6, 2006 (60 days after IMBRA's 
January 5 enactment).[Footnote 22] USCIS has not yet revised the 
petition. USCIS officials told us that they have been reviewing and 
consolidating suggested revisions to the I-129F, including IMBRA- 
related changes, and expect publication of the new Form I-129F in the 
Federal Register in mid-June 2006. 

Department of State officials told us that they had drafted guidance 
for consular officers that addresses the disclosure of a petitioner's 
criminal sexual offender background under the compelling circumstances 
exception to the Privacy Act. According to the Department of State, the 
draft guidance was essentially ready for issuance when IMBRA, which 
mandates disclosure of a petitioner's criminal history to certain 
beneficiaries, was enacted. As a result, it decided to revise its draft 
guidance to take the new statutory requirements into account. The 
officials said that they are preparing to issue disclosure guidance to 
consular officers that will cover discretionary Privacy Act disclosures 
not covered under IMBRA and are finalizing separate guidance with 
regard to the mandatory disclosures required under IMBRA. However, 
according to State Department officials, the IMBRA-related guidance 
cannot be issued until USCIS finalizes its IMBRA procedures, including 
revising the I-129F petition. 

Concluding Observations: 

Convicted sex offenders can sponsor noncitizen relatives, such as 
spouses, fiancé(e)s, and children, for entry into the United States. 
Not all beneficiaries may know that their petitioner has a criminal sex 
offender history that may put the beneficiary at risk. Recently enacted 
legislation has mitigated this risk for certain beneficiaries by 
requiring the State Department, in cooperation with USCIS, to disclose 
the petitioner's criminal background information, including sex crimes. 
Both agencies said that they plan to issue guidance on the new 
mandatory disclosure requirement. For beneficiaries who are not covered 
by the mandatory disclosure requirement, both USCIS and the State 
Department interpret a Privacy Act exception as giving them discretion 
to disclose a petitioner's criminal sexual history based on "compelling 
circumstances affecting the health or safety" of the beneficiary. Until 
recently, neither agency had issued guidance on this authority, but 
USCIS has now issued interim guidance to its adjudicators addressing 
compelling circumstance disclosures, and the State Department is 
preparing to issue its guidance to consular officers regarding 
discretionary Privacy Act disclosures not covered by IMBRA. On the 
basis of the agencies' Privacy Act guidance, beneficiaries who are not 
statutorily protected by the mandatory disclosure requirement may 
nevertheless be informed of their petitioners' criminal sexual history 
and the possible risk to their safety. 

Agency Comments: 

We requested comments on a draft of this report from the Secretaries of 
Homeland Security and State and the Attorney General. None of these 
officials provided formal comments. However, representatives from each 
of these departments provided technical comments which we incorporated 
into this report, as appropriate. 

We are sending copies of this report to the Secretaries of Homeland 
Security and State, the Attorney General, and interested congressional 
committees. We will also make copies available to others upon request. 
In addition, the report will be available at no charge on GAO's Web 
site at [Hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. 

If you or your staff have any questions concerning this report, please 
contact me at (202) 512-8777 or Jonespl@gao.gov. Contact points for our 
Offices of Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found on 
the last page of this report. Key contributors to this report are 
listed in appendix II. 

Signed by: 

Paul L. Jones: 
Director, Homeland Security and Justice Issues: 

[End of section] 

Appendix I: Scope and Methodology: 

To identify the number of convicted sex offenders who filed family- 
based petitions, we conducted a computer match of U.S. Citizenship and 
Immigration Services (USCIS) family-based petitioner data with data on 
individuals contained in the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) 
National Crime Information Center (NCIC) Convicted Sexual Offender 
Registry File, known as the National Sex Offender Registry. The USCIS 
petitioner data file contained records on 667,023 individuals who filed 
petitions for noncitizen relatives, such as a spouse or child, and 
66,658 individuals who filed petitions for noncitizen fiancé(e)s in 
fiscal year 2005. The FBI's NCIC National Sex Offender Registry 
contained data on the 412,773 convicted sex offenders as of December 
2005. 

The USCIS and FBI data files contained seven common data elements: (1) 
name (2) date of birth, (3) Social Security number, (4) street address, 
(5) city, (6) state, and (7) ZIP code that we could attempt to match in 
order to determine which petitioners were registered sex offenders. The 
name and date of birth were always present in both datasets, but in 
some cases the other data elements in either the USCIS or FBI dataset 
were either missing or not entered correctly. In order to increase the 
possibility of a valid match, we first applied acceptable data-cleaning 
steps. For example, we eliminated certain extraneous characters from 
the names and addresses, such as dashes, periods and hyphens and other 
nonessential characters that would otherwise impede our matching. In 
addition, we corrected for certain obvious typographical errors, such 
as typing a zero instead of the letter O. 

We conducted our match in two steps. In the first step, we matched 
cases on name and Social Security number since the Social Security 
number is considered a unique identifier. For our purposes, if the name 
and Social Security number were the same in both cases, we considered 
it a match. In the second step, after eliminating those we matched 
based on name and Social Security number, we matched the remaining 
records on name and date of birth. It is possible for two people to 
have the same name and date of birth. Therefore, to be deemed a match 
for our purposes, the name, date of birth, and several data elements 
needed to match to provide a high level of assurance that the 
petitioner and the registered sex offender were the same person. For 
example, if the name, date of birth and street address, city, and ZIP 
code were the same, we considered it a match. We also analyzed the 
USCIS data set to determine the number of petitioners that may have 
filed more than one petition to arrive at the number of unique sex 
offenders. 

To determine the reliability of the USCIS data, we observed how 
petitioner data are entered into the USCIS data system, interviewed 
relevant USCIS officials and staff, reviewed pertinent documents, and 
performed electronic testing for obvious errors in accuracy and 
completeness. To determine the reliability of the FBI's Convicted 
Sexual Offender Registry File, we interviewed FBI officials and system 
programmers knowledgeable about the data, reviewed pertinent 
information regarding the FBI's sex offender registry, and performed 
electronic testing for obvious errors in accuracy and completeness. We 
determined that the data were sufficiently reliable for the purposes of 
this report. 

We conducted our work from August 2005 through June 2006 in accordance 
with generally accepted government auditing standards. 

[End of section] 

Appendix II: GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments: 

GAO Contact: 

Paul L. Jones, (202) 512-8777: 

Staff Acknowledgments: 

In addition to the above, Michael Dino, Assistant Director, Carla 
Brown, Christine Davis, Katherine Davis, Darryl Dutton, Lemuel Jackson, 
and James Ungvarsky were key contributors to this report. 

FOOTNOTES 

[1] For the purposes of this report, we are considering petitions for 
family members and fiancé(e)s as family-based petitions. 

[2] 8 U.S.C. § 1101(b)(1). 

[3] The requirement to establish the registry appears at 42 U.S.C. § 
14072(b). Detailed statutory definitions for the registry's three 
offense categories appear at 42 U.S.C. § 14071(a)(3). 

[4] Adjudicators determine eligibility for various types of immigration 
benefits, including permission for relatives to immigrate and 
permission to become U.S. citizens. 

[5] The INA is deemed to refer to the Secretary of Homeland Security in 
describing those immigration functions, such as those performed by 
USCIS, which were transferred to the Secretary from the Attorney 
General under the Homeland Security Act of 2002. 6 U.S.C. § 557. 

[6] Because lawful permanent residents may not bring fiancé(e)s into 
the United States, they must file an I-130 petition for immigration of 
a spouse after the marriage. 

[7] The NCIC is a national database of documented criminal justice 
information and consists of 18 data files. The seven property files 
contain records for articles, boats, guns, license plates, securities, 
vehicles, and vehicle and boat parts. The 11 person files are the 
Convicted Sexual Offender Registry, Foreign Fugitive, Identity Theft, 
Immigration Violator, Missing Person, Protection Order, Supervised 
Release, Unidentified Person, U.S. Secret Service Protective, Violent 
Gang and Terrorist Organization, and Wanted Person Files. The 
Interstate Identification Index, which contains automated criminal 
history record information, is also accessible through the same network 
as the NCIC. 

[8] Pub. L. No. 104-236, 110 Stat. 3093 (1996). 

[9] 18 U.S.C. § 2256(1). 

[10] The 45 convictions include sex offender---child fondling (35), 
statutory rape (7), sex assault---sodomy boy (1), incest with minor 
(1), and exploitation minor-photograph (1). 

[11] 42 U.S.C. § 14071(a)(3)(C). 

[12] While USCIS may not deny a petition based solely on the 
petitioner's criminal history, USCIS officials stated that they may 
commence removal proceedings if the petitioner is a lawful permanent 
resident who has been convicted of a sex offense that renders him or 
her removable from the United States. Section 237(a)(2) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act contains a list of criminal offenses 
(such as moral turpitude) that could cause a person to lose his or her 
lawful permanent resident status. 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2). However, 
deportation is not an option for U.S. citizens with criminal 
backgrounds. 

[13] IMBRA was enacted on January 5, 2006, as part of the Violence 
Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, 
Pub. L. No. 109-162, 119 Stat. 2960 (2006). The statute's IMBRA 
provisions are set forth in sections 831 through 834, and IMBRA 
citations in this report will identify the appropriate section. 

[14] 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b). 

[15] K nonimmigrant visa applicants are so called because they are 
defined by subparagraph (K) of section 101(a)(15) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act (INA). In particular, a K nonimmigrant is one of 
the following: (1) a fiancé(e) of a U.S. citizen seeking to marry 
within 90 days of entering the United States; (2) the spouse of a U.S. 
citizen seeking to enter the United States as a nonimmigrant while 
awaiting the approval of an immigrant (i.e., lawful permanent resident) 
visa; or (3) the minor child (i.e., unmarried child under 21 years old) 
of the aforementioned fiancé(e) or spouse, who will be accompanying 
them to the United States. 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(K), (b)(1). 

[16] USCIS's revised I-129F petition is currently in draft form. As 
required by statute, the specified crimes that petitioners must report 
on their I-129F forms are domestic violence, sexual assault, child 
abuse and neglect, dating violence, elder abuse, stalking, homicide, 
murder, manslaughter, rape, abusive sexual contact, sexual 
exploitation, incest, torture, trafficking, peonage, holding hostage, 
involuntary servitude, slave trade, kidnapping, abduction, unlawful 
criminal restraint, false imprisonment, or at least three convictions 
for crimes relating to a controlled substance or alcohol not arising 
from a single act. 

[17] IMBRA does not permit USCIS to conduct any new or additional 
criminal background check that is not otherwise conducted in the course 
of adjudicating petitions. IMBRA, section 833(a)(5)(A)(iii). On the 
basis of this restriction, USCIS officials said that petition 
background checks will be limited to IBIS. 

[18] IMBRA, section 833(a)(5)(A)(iii). 

[19] IMBRA, section 833(a)(5)(A). IMBRA charges the Secretary of 
Homeland Security with developing the domestic violence information 
pamphlet, in consultation with the Attorney General, the Secretary of 
State, and nongovernmental organizations with expertise on the legal 
rights of immigrant victims of battery, extreme cruelty, sexual 
assault, and other crimes. The pamphlet must describe the legal rights 
and resources for immigrant victims of domestic violence and must be 
translated by the State Department into the languages having the 
greatest concentration of K nonimmigrant visa applicants. IMBRA, 
section 833(a)(1), (4). IMBRA required the pamphlet to be available for 
distribution in the required translations by May 5, 2006 (120 days 
after IMBRA's January 5 enactment). IMBRA, section 833(a)(6). However, 
at the time of this report, the pamphlet was still in draft form. 

[20] IMBRA, section 833(a)(5)(A)(iii). 

[21] The legislative history does not explain why Congress limited 
IMBRA's mandatory disclosure requirement to K nonimmigrants. See H.R. 
Rep. No. 109-233, at 117, 121 (2005). 

[22] IMBRA, section 832(a)(3). 

GAO's Mission: 

The Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of 
Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting its constitutional 
responsibilities and to help improve the performance and accountability 
of the federal government for the American people. GAO examines the use 
of public funds; evaluates federal programs and policies; and provides 
analyses, recommendations, and other assistance to help Congress make 
informed oversight, policy, and funding decisions. GAO's commitment to 
good government is reflected in its core values of accountability, 
integrity, and reliability. 

Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony: 

The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no 
cost is through the Internet. GAO's Web site ( www.gao.gov ) contains 
abstracts and full-text files of current reports and testimony and an 
expanding archive of older products. The Web site features a search 
engine to help you locate documents using key words and phrases. You 
can print these documents in their entirety, including charts and other 
graphics. 

Each day, GAO issues a list of newly released reports, testimony, and 
correspondence. GAO posts this list, known as "Today's Reports," on its 
Web site daily. The list contains links to the full-text document 
files. To have GAO e-mail this list to you every afternoon, go to 
www.gao.gov and select "Subscribe to e-mail alerts" under the "Order 
GAO Products" heading. 

Order by Mail or Phone: 

The first copy of each printed report is free. Additional copies are $2 
each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent 
of Documents. GAO also accepts VISA and Mastercard. Orders for 100 or 
more copies mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent. 
Orders should be sent to: 

U.S. Government Accountability Office 

441 G Street NW, Room LM 

Washington, D.C. 20548: 

To order by Phone: 

Voice: (202) 512-6000: 

TDD: (202) 512-2537: 

Fax: (202) 512-6061: 

To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs: 

Contact: 

Web site: www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm 

E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov 

Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470: 

Public Affairs: 

Jeff Nelligan, managing director, 

NelliganJ@gao.gov 

(202) 512-4800 

U.S. Government Accountability Office, 

441 G Street NW, Room 7149 

Washington, D.C. 20548: