U.S. House of Representatives Seal U.S. Congressman
Congressman James E. Clyburn
Sixth District, South Carolina

Capitol Column

1703 Gervais Street  .  Columbia, SC 29201  .  (803) 799-1100  .  Contact: Hope Derrick
 
Tax Cuts Before Budget: Formula for Disaster
March 19, 2001
 

The President, a former baseball man, is fond of quoting the quotable Yogi Berra.  I was reminded of one of the Yankees Great's often repeated assertions "it's deja vu all over again" when the House of Representatives put President George W. Bush's tax cut package on the fast track. 

Early in my career, I was a high school history teacher.  I taught my students just as I had learned, some things in history seem to run in 20-year cycles.  It was in 1981 that Ronald Reagan secured passage of his trickle-down economic proposal, which was a colossal mistake.  The March 2001 House vote in support of Bush's tax package is a prime example of our history's cyclical nature. 

It also signifies the return of politics over reason.  There is absolutely no sensible reason that Congress should be considering any tax cuts when we have not yet taken up the budget.  This action is one of the most asinine things I have witnessed in Washington.  And this is not my partisanship talking.  In fact, I voted against the Democrats substitution tax package just as I opposed the Bush plan. 

The numbers just don't add up.  Both parties have stated their priorities are to protect Social Security, preserve Medicare, increase defense and education spending, also give the citizens a tax break.   How can we do all these things and pay down the national debt?

It is my belief that reducing the debt is the best tax cut we can give the American people.  Paying down the debt will reduce interest on mortgages, car loans, and credit card bills.  Taxpayers would realize greater financial gains by cutting mortgages just half a percentage point, than they would if they received a few hundred dollars in tax relief.  In addition, that financial gain would last over the duration of their mortgage, when a tax cut can change with the political winds. 

If tax cuts prevail and the surplus is squandered, our national debt will again skyrocket to the record $290 billion level it attained by the end of the former President Bush's term.  The recession that accompanied that deficit will surely return as well.

I am not isolated in my criticism of considering a tax cut plan in a vacuum without first passing a budget.  In fact, President Reagan's own Director of the Office of Management and Budget, David Stockton, acknowledged this scenario was the crux of their failure with trickle down economics.  After leaving the Reagan administration, Stockman was quoted in the Atlantic Monthly as saying "we didn't add up all the numbers.  The numbers were moving on independent tracks."

          Now "it's deja vu all over again."  The $2.4 trillion needed to pay for the Bush tax cut package must be offset with cuts in the budget.  The $64,000 unanswered question is where will it come from?  Until those specifics are known, notions of cutting taxes should remain just that -- a notion.  It is my hope and belief that cooler heads will prevail in the Senate.  If not, the future economic security of our country is in jeopardy. 

Yogi Berra had another famous saying that went "the future ain't what it used to be."  But based on our knowledge of the past, we can make sure we don't repeat the same mistakes.  I urge Congress and the American people to think rationally before placing their trust in a tax plan built on quick sand.  Once we have a budget, I welcome any discussion of tax cuts.  I just want to be sure we don't have cause to be admonished as Berra did after the Yankees lost the 1960 series to Pittsburgh, "we made to many wrong mistakes." 

          #   #   #


Next                                                        Previous
Statement            Statement List            Statement