Washington, D.C. - Today, Senator Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ) and Representatives Hilda L. Solis (D-CA) and Henry Waxman (D-CA) introduced major legislation to protect Americans, especially children, from toxic chemicals in everyday consumer products. The bill would ensure for the first time that all the chemicals used in baby bottles, children's toys and other products are proven to be safe before they are put on the market.
"Every day, consumers rely on household products that contain hundreds of chemicals. The American public expects the federal government to keep families safe by testing chemicals- but the government is letting them down," Lautenberg said. "We already have strong regulations for pesticides and pharmaceuticals- it's common sense that we do the same for chemicals that end up in household items such as bottles and toys."
"Recent news regarding bisphenol A in baby bottles underscores the need for significant reform to ensure children are not unnecessarily exposed to chemicals which threaten their health and environment," Solis said. "The Kids-Safe Chemicals Act is needed to repair the fundamentally flawed chemical regulatory structure. Our nation's children deserve adequate protection and I look forward to working with my colleagues to ensure their health is protected."
"It is critical that we modernize our nation's chemical safety laws," said Rep. Waxman. "The Kid Safe Chemical Act will deliver what its name implies- a non-toxic environment for our children."
Out of the 80,000 chemicals used to produce in our homes, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has only required testing of 200. That lack of testing and regulation is putting people in danger, especially our children. For example, new scientific studies by the EPA have demonstrated a link between "Bisphenol A," a chemical used to make baby bottles and water bottles, and a host of medical problems, including cancer and reproductive issues.
The legislation, called the Kids Safe Chemical Act, would therefore establish a safety standard for each chemical on the market. It would also shift the burden for proving chemicals are safe from EPA to the chemical manufacturers. Under the bill, the manufacturers would have to provide the EPA the data necessary to determine if a chemical is safe. The bill would give new authority to EPA to restrict the use of chemicals which fail to meet the EPA's safety standard.
In a 2006 report, the GAO cited the weakness of the current law, known as the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), as one of the reasons for the lack of safety and consumer protection. Only five chemicals that existed 29 years ago when Congress passed TSCA have ever been restricted by EPA, according to the GAO. The new bill would have the EPA evaluate every chemical product created for commerce, to make sure that it is safe before it is allowed onto the market.
###
|