As the deadline for applying for fourth-year funds approached in FY 1990, it became clear that a number of States were not prepared to meet the fourth-year requirements. At the time it appeared that the only option open to those States was to drop out of the program completely. To enable States to remain in the program, Congress amended the Part H requirements, effective June 1991, and adopted a system of differential funding for FY 1990, 1991, and 1992.
States that were able to move ahead on the original implementation schedule set forth in Part H by P.L. 99-457 received larger grants than States that had not completed either fourth- or fifth-year requirements. States that were having difficulty meeting the requirements for the fourth or fifth year of participation were eligible to receive up to two extended participation grants. A State under the extended participation option received a grant award equal to the State's grant award from the previous year. Ten States and one Outlying Area requested extended participation for FY 1990. In FY 1991, 18 States provided assurances for meeting full implementation of the Part H program, 26 States entered their first year of extended participation, and 11 States entered their second and therefore final year of extended participation.
As reported in the 16th Annual Report to Congress, at the close of FY 1992 a total of 41 States and jurisdictions had been awarded grants for full implementation of Part H. Twelve States and jurisdictions had received awards for a second year of extended participation, and one State did not apply for a Part H grant. No further extensions were authorized. On September 30, 1994, the end of availability for FY 1993 funds, all States and jurisdictions assured full implementation of the Part H program.
To further support the implementation of the Part H program during FY 1993, Congress appropriated $213,280,000, 23 percent more than the $172,861,111 million appropriated for FY 1992. Table 2.1 reports the FY 1993 Part H grant amount for each State and Outlying Area.1
STATE PART H ----------------------------------------------------- Alabama $3,046,905 Alaska 1,042,702 Arizona 3,312,138 Arkansas 1,736,776 California 29,207,477 Colorado 2,642,716 Connecticut 2,426,424 Delaware 1,042,702 District of Columbia 1,042,702 Florida 9,650,350 Georgia 5,417,361 Guam 880,891 Hawaii 1,042,702 Idaho 1,042,702 Illinois 9,265,029 Indiana 4,124,608 Iowa 1,934,501 Kansas 1,869,241 Kentucky 2,620,544 Louisiana 3,458,507 Maine 1,042,702 Maryland 3,926,195 Massachusetts 4,451,846 Michigan 7,359,225 Minnesota 3,334,075 Mississippi 2,078,640 Missouri 3,808,036 Montana 1,042,702 Nebraska 1,191,819 Nevada $1,082,919 New Hampshire 1,042,702 New Jersey 5,884,344 New Mexico 1,352,764 New York 14,117,157 North Carolina 5,011,663 North Dakota 1,042,702 Ohio 8,016,235 Oklahoma 2,344,879 Oregon 2,121,710 Pennsylvania 8,210,103 Puerto Rico 3,045,563 Rhode Island 1,042,702 South Carolina 2,796,532 South Dakota 1,042,702 Tennessee 3,619,468 Texas 15,327,041 Utah 1,778,806 Vermont 1,042,702 Virginia 4,789,719 Virgin Islands 522,340 Washington 3,943,587 West Virginia 1,098,617 Wisconsin 3,581,798 Wyoming 1,042,702 American Samoa 400,457 Bureau of Indian Affairs 2,606,756 Palau 79,593 Northern Marianas 249,519 ------------------------------------------------------ U.S. and Outlying Areas $213,280,000 50 States, D.C. & P.R. $208,540,444Source: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS).
States and Outlying Areas reported to OSEP that on December 1, 1993, they were serving a total of 154,065 infants and toddlers with disabilities, or 1.3 percent of the entire birth through age 2 population. Chapter 1 (SOP) programs were serving 93,587 of the infants and toddlers, and 60,478 were receiving services under other early intervention programs. As indicated in table 2.2, about 7 percent more infants and toddlers were receiving services in December 1993 than in December 1992.
Table 2.2 also indicates that until 1993, there had been a steady toddlers served under all programs. This decline occurred even though increasing numbers of infants and toddlers were being served under Chapter 1 (SOP), and increasing numbers of States were fully participating in the Part H program. It must be noted, however, that the decline may have been a result of the data collection practice s States used in the early years of the program. Previously, States included children who received some services and who did not necessarily have IFSPs. Further, there is an unknown degree of error in the data from the early years of the program due to problems with the count of children in early intervention programs. Some children may have been counted more than once, and others may not have been counted at all.
Percentage Change in Number Number Percentage of Total Number Served Under Served (All Population Served from Year Chapter 1 Programs) Served Previous Year ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1989 37,317 247,477 2.0 N/A 1990 50,827 194,363 1.77 -21.5 1991 66,478 166,634 1.41 -14.3 1992 76,397 143,392 1.18 -13.9 1993 93,587 154,065 1.30 + 7.4Source: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS).
States have repeatedly maintained that the December 1 child count does not accurately report the number of infants and toddlers with disabilities actually served during the entire school year, in part because children may move in or out of service areas and programs during the year. In 1993, 22 States voluntarily submitted a cumulative count along with their December 1 count for their birth through age 2 populations. Nineteen of those States reported that their cumulative count was higher than their December 1 count. One State reported that its cumulative count was 330.5 percent larger than its December 1 count, but another State reported that its cumulative count was 45.9 percent less than its December 1 count. None of the States reported information that explained why the cumulative and December 1 counts differed.
Table 2.3 shows the number of infants and toddlers served in each State under Chapter 1 (SOP) and all other programs as of December 1, 1993. Overall, 36 States served more infants and toddlers in 1993 than in 1992. The increase in the total number of infants and toddlers served was the result of a fairly large increase in the number served under Chapter 1 (SOP) programs (22.4 percent) and a 9.7 percent decrease in the number served under all other programs. More than half the increase in the number served under Chapter 1 (SOP) programs occurred in two States(Florida and New York). Florida reported serving 9,460 infants and toddlers in Chapter 1 (SOP) programs in 1993, while in 1992 it reported serving only 2,027 -- an increase of 7,433.
BIRTH PERCENTAGE OTHER CHAPTER 1 THROUGH 2 OF STATE PROGRAMS (SOP) TOTAL POPULATION POPULATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Alabama 414 780 1,194 181,899 0.66 Alaska 0 605 605 33,995 1.78 Arizona 637 998 1,635 196,188 0.83 Arkansas 798 1,160 1,958 102,777 1.91 California 14,529 936 15,465 1,750,520 0.88 Colorado 2,377 948 3,325 160,460 2.07 Connecticut 0 1,266 1,266 137,767 0.92 Delaware 943 40 983 31,924 3.08 District of Columbia 746 308 1,054 24,195 4.36 Florida 0 9,460 9,460 569,524 1.66 Georgia 2,703 189 2,892 325,338 0.89 Hawaii 2,853 793 3,646 57,865 6.30 Idaho 0 764 764 51,318 1.49 Illinois 2,483 5,030 7,513 555,545 1.35 Indiana 1,479 2,763 4,242 242,863 1.75 Iowa 0 969 969 111,648 0.87 Kansas 129 887 1,016 109,060 0.93 Kentucky 0 978 978 156,966 0.62 Louisiana 305 2,078 2,383 206,617 1.15 Maine 756 0 756 46,520 1.63 Maryland 0 3,356 3,356 224,834 1.49 Massachusetts 0 7,197 7,197 254,606 2.83 Michigan 458 3,004 3,462 411,802 0.84 Minnesota 0 2,436 2,436 193,956 1.26 Mississippi 134 80 214 126,082 0.17 Missouri 0 2,087 2,087 222,191 0.94 Montana 0 402 402 34,437 1.17 Nebraska 0 722 722 67,649 1.07 Nevada 0 596 596 66,064 0.90 New Hampshire 19 661 680 46,280 1.47 New Jersey 464 2,369 2,833 349,884 0.81 New Mexico 950 67 1,017 82,771 1.23 New York 0 5,914 5,914 832,200 0.71 North Carolina 6,222 874 7,096 301,792 2.35 North Dakota 0 195 195 25,659 0.76 Ohio 13,945 0 13,945 485,629 2.87 Oklahoma 0 1,460 1,460 140,632 1.04 Oregon 0 1,271 1,271 124,222 1.02 Pennsylvania 0 6,227 6,227 481,857 1.29 Puerto Rico 4,325 0 4,325 . . Rhode Island 0 672 672 42,930 1.57 South Carolina 0 1,399 1,399 164,877 0.85 South Dakota 16 286 302 32,922 0.92 Tennessee 1,378 2,059 3,437 217,389 1.58 Texas 122 8,676 8,798 941,199 0.93 Utah 388 1,106 1,494 108,073 1.38 Vermont 13 160 173 2,333 0.77 Virginia 280 2,334 2,614 283,114 0.92 Washington 280 2,226 2,506 235,308 1.06 West Virginia 202 1,307 1,509 64,625 2.34 Wisconsin 0 2,998 2,998 206,904 1.45 Wyoming 0 427 427 19,959 2.14 American Samoa 0 0 0 . . Guam 86 18 104 . . Northern Marianas 44 44 88 . . Palau . 5 5 . . Virgin Islands . 0 0 . . Bureau of Indian Affairs . . . . . -------------------------------------------------------------------- U.S. & Outlying Areas 60,478 93,587 154,065 11,865,169 1.30 50 States,D.C., and P.R. 60,348 93,520 153,868 11,865,169 1.30Note: Data presented in the column "Chapter 1 (SOP)" were taken from the certified reports on the number of infants, toddlers, and children (birth through 21) served under Chapter 1 (SOP) and submitted by the Stated Educational Agencies. Data presented under "Other Programs" were taken from reports of the number of infants and toddlers served that were submitted by Part H Lead Agencies.
Note: Population figures are July estimates from the Bureau of the Census. No Census data are available for Outlying Areas.
Note: Data as of October 1, 1994.
Source: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS).
Florida reported that expansion of services, new definitions for eligibility, and rapid population growth were the main reasons the increase occurred. New York reported serving 5,914 infants and toddlers under Chapter 1 (SOP) in 1993 compared to 3,730 in 1992--an increase of 2,184. New York reported that the increase was due to a change in reporting methodology. In the past, New York surveyed service providers to produce a child count. In 1993, they switched to performing an actual child count.
The 9.7 percent decrease in the number of infants and toddlers served under all other programs would have been even larger if not for: (1) large service population increases in California (14,529 in 1993 versus 10,943 in 1992), which reported it was able to serve more infants and toddlers because it had more funds to do so; (2) Indiana (1,479 versus 515 in 1992), which reported an increase in the number of children identified as "at-risk"; and (3) Ohio (13,945 in 1993 versus 11,394 in 1992), which reported an expansion of services at the local level. But the decrease is otherwise accounted for by very large decreases in (1) Connecticut (which did not report a reason for the decrease), (2) Florida and Missouri (which now serve all eligible children from birth through age 2 under the Chapter 1 (SOP) program), and (3) Massachusetts (which now uses improved reporting methods, enabling it to avoid the duplicate reporting of past years). These four States reported serving no infants and toddlers in programs other than Chapter 1 (SOP) during 1993, although in 1992 their combined count of nearly 12,000 was about one-fifth of all infants and toddlers served in those early intervention programs other than Chapter 1 (SOP).
Regardless of whether infants and toddlers are counted as receiving services in Chapter 1 (SOP) or non-Chapter 1 (SOP) programs, the overall proportion served changed little in most States. As in 1992, most States and jurisdictions served less than 2 percent of their total from birth through age 2 population in programs for infants and toddlers with disabilities in 1993, although the range across States varied widely. Some of the variation may be explained by variability in eligibility criteria, the child find and outreach strategies used, and because some States operate non-mandated programs for infants and toddlers who have been identified as "at-risk" for developing a disability. While these "at-risk" programs are not required under Part H, those States utilizing this option include "at-risk" infants and toddlers in their child counts.
U.S. AND 50 STATES, D.C., SETTING OUTLYING AREAS AND P.R. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Early intervention classroom 36,541 36,483 Family day care 703 698 Home 40,896 40,826 Hospital (inpatient) 8,122 8,096 Outpatient service facility 37,409 37,390 Regular nursery school /day care 4,444 4,441 Residential facility 105 105 Other setting 10,987 10,982 All settings 139,207 139,021Note: Data as of October 1, 1994.
Source: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS).
The patterns of use of the various settings differs somewhat by the age of the infants and toddlers receiving services (see figure 2.1). For infants and toddlers from 0 to 1, services are equally likely to be delivered at the home or at the outpatient service facility (32 percent each). Only 16 percent of infants and toddlers from 0 to 1 receive services in early intervention classrooms. Infants and toddlers age 1 to 2 are even more likely to receive services in the home (38 percent). However, they are nearly equally likely to receive services in either the early intervention classroom (23 percent) or in outpatient services facilities (25 percent).
Infants and toddlers with disabilities age 2 to 3 are most often provided services in either the home (36 percent) or early intervention classroom (33 percent). Only 16 percent receive services in outpatient services facilities.
The methods used to collect data on the services delivered to infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families are also evolving. Some States report that this information is an accurate description of services, but others have not been able to collect complete data (see table 2.5). The 1992-93 data shows that (1) special instruction, (2) family training, counseling and home visits, and (3) speech or language pathology were the services most often provided, and that they were provided with similar frequency. This pattern is somewhat different from the previous year's data, which indicated that special instruction was the service most often provided, followed by speech/language pathology, social work, occupational therapy, and physical therapy.
ALL STAFF STATE FTE EMPLOYED FTE NEEDEDa/ --------------------------------------------------------------- Alabama 126 35 Alaska 55 0 Arizona 157 53 Arkansas 228 47 California . . Colorado 73 10 Connecticut 254 13 Delaware 102 18 District of Columbia 125 29 Florida 174 173 Georgia 525 234 Hawaii 300 81 Idaho 109 463 Illinois 294 44 Indiana 450 126 Iowa 22 0 Kansas 247 68 Kentucky 0 73 Louisiana 321 154 Maine 376 0 Maryland 446 12 Massachusetts 571 718 Michigan 441 0 Minnesota 1,122 0 Mississippi 61 20 Missouri 127 0 Montana 74 3 Nebraska 135 0 Nevada 63 1 New Hampshire 73 1 New Jersey 0 0 New Mexico 167 0 New York 15,224 2,311 North Carolina . . North Dakota 26 1 Ohio 2,390 283 Oklahoma 138 10 Oregon 0 0 Pennsylvania 1,004 174 Puerto Rico 225 0 Rhode Island 50 18 South Carolina 119 0 South Dakota 189 53 Tennessee 561 78 Texas 1,073 47 Utah 56 3 Vermont 20 31 Virginia 1,796 422 Washington 0 527 West Virginia 138 11 Wisconsin 366 0 Wyoming 95 83 American Samoa 31 0 Guam 19 8 Northern Marianas 13 0 Palau . . Virgin Islands . . Bureau of Indian Affairs . . ---------------------------------------------------------------- U.S. and Outlying Areas 30,747 6,434 50 States, D.C., and P.R. 30,684 6,426a/ These figures include: (1) the number of unfilled vacancies in funded positions that occurred during the 1992-93 school year (12 months), and (2) the number of additional personnel that were needed during the 1992-93 school year (12 months) to fill positions occupied by persons who were not fully certified or licensed. These figures include additional personnel needed by public and private agencies.
Source:U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS).
OSEP has also begun reviewing the State-reported Part H data more stringently. This review is identical to the one annually conducted on Part B and Chapter 1 (SOP) data, and was conducted on the Part H data presented in this Annual Report. To conduct the review, Part H data on the number of infants and toddlers and their families served and services provided to infants and toddlers were compared to data from the previous year. These comparisons have three purposes: 1) they provide additional checks on the data preparation process; 2) they provide checks on possible data aggregation problems at the State level; and 3) they permit an initial evaluation regarding whether the variation from one year to the next is reasonable or logical. OSEP has set specific guidelines for what defines a logical change from the previous year.
States with large variations from the previous year were asked to explain them. In some cases, States provided revised counts, while others provided explanations for the variations. These explanations appear in the Data Notes section of Appendix A. States were also questioned about count discrepancies that were identified when OSEP compared the data across data tables. See the Data Notes in Appendix A for a summary of these States' explanations for the discrepancies.
2 Throughout this chapter, Chapter 1 (SOP) refers to the Chapter 1 Handicapped Program of ESEA which supports State operated and supported programs for persons with disabilities.
3 The Improving America's Schools Act (IASA) of 1994 merged the Chapter 1 Handicapped program with IDEA as of fiscal year 1995. For 1995, $34,000,000 of the appropriation of Part H will be distributed based on the count of children aged birth through 2 on December 1, 1994 who would have been eligible to participate under the Chapter 1 Handicapped program, as in effect prior to the enactment of the IASA. In addition, for fiscal years 1995-1999, the IASA added a hold harmless provision whereby no State may receive less than the combined total it received for children birth through 2 under the Chapter 1 handicapped and Part H programs in fiscal year 1994. However, in fiscal years 1998 or 1999, if the total number of children aged birth through 2 for a State declines below the number reported for the State fiscal year 1994, the hold harmless amount would be reduced by the same percentage.
-###-