PHMSA Gas Integrity Management
Time: 11/09/2008 07:25 PM

PHMSA Gas Integrity Management Protocol Results Form

Protocol:  A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P 

Explanation of Protocol Format

Each protocol element will have top-tier protocols that address the high level requirements. The regulatory requirement upon which the protocol is based is contained in brackets; e.g., [§192.905(a)]

Each top-tier protocol will have detailed "sub-tier" protocols which collectively lead the inspector to draw overall conclusions about compliance with the top-tier protocol. The regulatory requirement, upon which each sub-tier protocol is based, is also contained in brackets.

Notes on protocols:
  • The typical sentence structure used in the protocols follows the form of "Verify that [describe the requirement]." The use and meaning of the term "verify" is expanded upon below.
  • PHMSA will "verify" an operator’s compliance status with respect to each requirement. In order to perform this verification, PHMSA will inspect the operator’s documented processes and procedures in order to determine if a program has been established that complies with rule requirements. In addition, PHMSA will inspect an operator’s implementation records to determine if the operator is effectively implementing its programs and processes. The purpose of the PHMSA verification/inspection is not to perform a quality check of every integrity related activity. The PHMSA inspection is conducted in the form of an audit. As a result, the PHMSA inspection will typically perform an inspection of selected operator records sufficient in breadth and depth to give the inspection team adequate understanding regarding the degree of an operator's commitment to compliance with applicable requirements and/or the degree to which the operator's program has been effective with respect to achieving compliance. PHMSA may use any number of inspection or audit techniques to identify potential compliance issues. Program documents may be inspected to determine if adequate processes have been developed and documented to the degree necessary for competent professionals to understand and effectively implement the process with results that are consistent and repeatable. For example, one technique that might be used by the inspection team is a "vertical slice" in which a specific covered segment or pipeline system is selected to perform a detailed inspection of every aspect of integrity management, thus following a specific example through the entire process of integrity management. Based on those reviews, OPS will identify potential non-compliances with rule requirements. PHMSA can not and will not certify nor conclude that an operator is in full compliance with rule requirements, even if the inspection does not identify any areas of non-compliance. Operators are wholly responsible for compliance with regulations.
  • References to regulatory requirements may include references to specific rule sections/paragraphs and/or to industry standards that are invoked in the rule. As specified in §192.7, any requirement invoked by reference is a requirement of the rule as though it were set out in full in the regulation.
  • Protocols are subject to change without notice.
  • Protocols are an initial guide for use by OPS inspectors during Integrity Management inspections. Inspectors will develop additional questioning during the course of the inspection to investigate the specifics of an operator's program. Protocols are not to be construed as an exhaustive list of questions that may be presented to operators during an inspection.
  • Protocols are made publicly available as a courtesy to operators as they develop their Integrity Management program, as well as other stakeholders.

Protocol Area M. Communications Plan

  • M.01 External and Internal Communication Requirements
  • M.02 Addressing Safety Concerns

M.01 External and Internal Communication Requirements

Verify that an integrity management communication plan exists that meets the requirements of ASME B31.8S-2004, Section 10. [§192.911(m)]

M.01.a. Verify that the operator has submitted its API-1162 external communications plan to the PHMSA clearinghouse for approval.

M.01.a. Inspection Results    Type an "X" in the applicable box below. Select only one.
No Issues Identified
Potential Issues Identified (explain in summary)
Not Applicable (explain in summary)

 

M.01.a. Inspection Issues Summary    Leave blank if no issue was identified.

 

M.01.b. Verify provisions for operator internal organizational communication exist to establish understanding of and support for the integrity management program. [ASME B31.8S-2004, Section 10.3]

M.01.b. Inspection Results    Type an "X" in the applicable box below. Select only one.
No Issues Identified
Potential Issues Identified (explain in summary)
Not Applicable (explain in summary)

 

M.01.b. Inspection Issues Summary    Leave blank if no issue was identified.

 

M.01 Documents Reviewed    (Tab from bottom-right cell to add additional rows.)
Document Number Rev Date Document Title

 

M.01 Inspection Notes

 

M.02 Addressing Safety Concerns

Verify that provisions exist to address safety concerns raised by:

M.02.a. PHMSA and State or local pipeline safety authorities (when a covered segment is located in a State where PHMSA has an interstate agent agreement). [�192.911(m)(1) and �192.911(m)(2)].

M.02.a. Inspection Results    Type an "X" in the applicable box below. Select only one.
No Issues Identified
Potential Issues Identified (explain in summary)
Not Applicable (explain in summary)

 

M.02.a. Inspection Issues Summary    Leave blank if no issue was identified.

 

M.02 Documents Reviewed    (Tab from bottom-right cell to add additional rows.)
Document Number Rev Date Document Title

 

M.02 Inspection Notes

 

Protocol:  A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P 
PHMSA Home | Pipeline Safety Website | Feedback | Privacy Policy | FOIA