|
DEVELOPMENT
OF HUMAN FACTORS GUIDELINES FOR
ADVANCED
TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE OPERATIONS
HEAD-UP
DISPLAYS AND DRIVER ATTENTION
FOR
NAVIGATION INFORMATION
Publication No. FHWA-RD-96-153
March 1998
FOREWORD
This report is
one of a series reports produced as part of a contract designed to develop
precise, detailed human factors design guidelines for Advanced Traveler
Information Systems (ATIS) and Commercial Vehicle Operations (CVO).
The contractual effort consists of three phases: analytic, empirical,
and integration. This report is a product of the empirical phase. The
empirical phase will also address topics such as: ATIS function transition,
display channels, multi-modality displays, CVO driver fatigue, display
formats and workload, and head-up displays (HUDs). Among the analytic
topics discussed in the series are functional description of ATIS/CVO,
comparable systems analysis, task analysis of ATIS/CVO functions, alternate
systems analysis, identification and exploration of driver acceptance,
and definition and prioritization of research studies.
This report documents
a study that was performed to determine the effects of an automotive
HUD when used to present route guidance information.
Copies of this
report can be obtained through the Research and Technology Report Center,
9701 Philadelphia Court, Unit Q, Lanham, Maryland 20706, telephone:
(301) 577-0818, fax: (301) 577-1421, or the National Technical Information
Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161, telephone:
(703) 487-4650, fax: (703) 321-8547.
Michael F. Trentacoste
Director, Office of Safety
Research and Development
|
Click
here to view document FHWA-RD-96-153 in PDF format (231 KB).
NOTE: This
PDF document requires Adobe Acrobat to view.
Click here to download Adobe Acrobat 4 for free.
Technical Report Documentation
Page
1. Report No.
FHWA-RD-96-153
|
2. Government Accession
No. |
3.
Recipient's Catalog No. |
4.
Title and Subtitle
ADVANCED TRAVELER
INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND COMMERCIAL VEHICLE OPERATIONS COMPONENTS OF
THE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: HEAD-UP DISPLAYS AND DRIVER
ATTENTION FOR NAVIGATION INFORMATION
|
5.
Report Date
March 6, 1998
|
|
6. Performing Organization
Code |
7.
Author(s)
B. L. Hooey &
B. F. Gore
|
8. Performing Organization
Report No. |
9.
Performing Organization Name and Address
Battelle Human
Factors Transportation Center
4000 NE 41st Street
P.O. Box 5395
Seattle, WA 98105-0395
|
10. Work Unit No.
(TRAIS)
3B2C1012
|
|
11. Contract or Grant
No.
DTFH61-92-C-00102
|
12. Sponsoring Agency
Name and Address
Office of Safety
and Traffic Operations R&D
Federal Highway Administration
6300 Georgetown Pike
McLean, VA 22101-2296
|
13. Type of Report
and Period Covered
Technical Report
April 1, 1997
- March 15, 1998
|
|
14. Sponsoring Agency
Code |
15.
Supplementary Notes
Contracting Officer's
Technical Representative (COTR): M. Joseph Moyer, HRDS; Thomas M. Granda,
HRDS (formerly with SAIC)
|
16. Abstract
Since the initial
development of prototype automotive head-up displays (HUDs), there has
been a concern that the presence of the HUD image may interfere with
the driving task and negatively impact driving performance. The overall
goal of this experiment was to examine the driving performance implications
of an automotive HUD when used to present simple route guidance information.
Of particular importance was how navigation aids (head-down display
[HDD] vs. HUD) and drivers' age interact to influence driver behavior.
Twenty-four younger and older subjects participated in the study, which
was conducted in the Battelle High-Fidelity Driving Simulator. Each
subject drove three experimental scenarios--two urban and one rural.
During the scenarios, subjects were required to adhere to posted speed
limits and remain within their lane boundaries. They were also required
to respond, as quickly as possible, to emergency incidents such as balls
rolling into the road, a car crossing against a red light immediately
in front of them, and a car in front of them suddenly braking to a stop.
This study revealed no differences with respect to navigation performance,
response to unexpected events, or driving performance as a function
of navigation aid. Nonetheless, while performance (considered overall)
was not better in the HUD condition than in the HDD condition, neither
was the HUD associated with performance decrements. In particular, none
of the results suggest that the HUD was a distraction to the subjects
or that it was associated with any form of cognitive capture.
|
17. Key Words
Human Factors,
Automotive Head-Up Displays (HUDs), Advanced Traveler Information Systems
(ATIS), Driver Attention, Navigation Messages
|
18. Distribution
Statement
No restrictions.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical
Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, 22161.
|
19. Security Classif.
(of this report)
Unclassified
|
20. Security Classif.
(of this page)
Unclassified
|
21. No. of Pages
60
|
22. Price |
Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72)
Reproduction of completed page authorized
|