Research Highlights
Managing Urban Storm Water Effects Through Grassroots ParticipationDuring a heavy rainfall, the impervious surfaces of urban environments—roadways, rooftops, and sidewalks—generate excess storm water runoff that can cause a long list of negative environmental impacts. These impacts can radiate throughout an entire watershed. Storm water runoff accelerated by impervious surfaces prevents the natural infiltration of rainfall into the soil and can dissolve and move contaminants, such as lawn chemicals, animal wastes, and rooftop and auto trace metals (copper, zinc, and nickel), into nearby streams. Large-scale engineering proposals for storm water controls are often rejected by taxpayers because of their cost and complexity. NRMRL sustainable technology scientists are testing an alternative, multidisciplinary control program in the Shepherd Creek watershed near Cincinnati, Ohio. The program offers property owners the opportunity to voluntarily cooperate in the management of excess storm water runoff through natural diversion, infiltration, and small-scale detention methods. Implemented in significant numbers within the watershed, this decentralized approach can restore watershed ecology to less-impaired conditions at a reasonable cost. BackgroundThe Shepherd Creek watershed is a small watershed (about two square kilometers) composed of mixed residential and commercial zones, forested parkland, and established homes built between 1960 and 1980. Previous NRMRL research identified five sub-watersheds with varying proportions of impervious surfaces, ranging from 12 to 20 percent. Stream conditions are known to decline more rapidly above 10 to 15 percent, and NRMRL research data confirmed heaviest impairments to Shepherd Creek streams at those sites with the highest percentages of impervious surfaces. Two chief goals of the program were to reduce immediate water quantity by mitigating the volume of storm water runoff, and to enhance water quality by reducing the potential for pollutants to be dissolved and transported. By infiltrating runoff, there is greater opportunity for the recharge of ground water and the natural cleansing of pollutants in soil, both of which help arrest major runoff impacts on waterways. From a number of Best Management Practices (BMPs) available for the watershed project, the NRMRL team selected rain barrels or cisterns, and rain gardens to reduce storm water runoff from rooftops, driveways, and lawns. The choice of BMPs was determined in part by the relatively high proportion of rooftops and driveways (50 to 72 percent) that comprise total amounts of impervious area of the sub-watersheds. Rain barrels detain runoff until owners use it to water gardens, for example. Rain gardens (intentional infiltration areas typically planted with native, water-tolerant plants) infiltrate surface runoff before it becomes unmanageable farther downstream. These source-reduction strategies, set on individual properties, allow for flexible distribution throughout a watershed, with the added advantages of ease of installation and maintenance. Legal and economic issues associated with private property rights were addressed through the adoption of a voluntary system, wherein homeowners bid at auction to participate and to specify their desired level of compensation. Researchers set a first-round goal of 150 properties as the threshold number whose impervious areas were likely sources of a variety of environmental impairments. About 120 rain barrels or cisterns, and 50 rain gardens, were installed during the summer of 2007. Planning continues for a second auction in 2008 to study its potential to recruit more participants to reduce their storm water runoff contribution. Evaluation of this program will compare baseline data with data collected for three years after the installation of the BMPs to determine whether these management measures had an effect on water quantity, water quality, and the ecological integrity of the streams that drain the watershed. Cost effectiveness of the auction as an economic incentive will also be measured. For details on the auction system through which volunteer participants are selected and other information about the Shepherd Creek project, see contact information. ContactJane Ice, NRMRL Office of Public Affairs (513) 569-7311 New NRMRL PublicationsAl-Abed, S.R. and Y. Fang. (2007). “Use of Granular Graphite for Electrolytic Dechlorination of Trichloroethylene.” Environmental Engineering Science, 24, 6: 842–851. Abstract Boczek, L.A., E.W. Rice, B. Johnston, and J. R. Johnston. (2007). “Occurrence of Antibiotic-Resistant Uropathogenic Escherichia Coli Clonal Group A in Wastewater Effluents.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73, 13: 4180–4184. Abstract Choi, J., R.C. Oberoi, J.R. Edwards, and J.A. Rosati. (2007). “An Immersed Boundary Method for Complex Incompressible Flows.” Journal of Computational Physics, 224, 2: 757–784. Abstract Eklund, B. M. and M. A. Simon. (2007). “Concentration of Tetrachloroethylene at a Former Dry Cleaner Facility as a Function of Subsurface Contamination: A Case Study.” Journal of Air & Waste Management, 57, 6: 753-760. Abstract Johnson, R. L. and M. A. Simon. (2007). “Evaluation of Ground Water Flow Patterns Around a Dual-Screened Ground Water Circulation Well.” Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 93, 1–4: 188–202. Abstract Loughlin, D.H., T. Johnson, et al. (2007). “Projecting Future-Year Pollutant Emissions: Emerging Approaches From the EPA ORD Global Change Air Quality Assessment (PDF).” (11 pp, 156 KB) In: Proceedings 16th Annual International Emissions Inventory Conference, Raleigh, NC, May 14–7. Lu, J., J.W. Santo Domingo, and O.C. Shanks. (2007). “Identification of Chicken-Specific Fecal Microbial Sequences Using a Metagenomic Approach.” Water Research, 41, 16: 3561–3574. Abstract Ludwig, R.D., C. Su, et al. (2007). “In Situ Chemical Reduction of Cr(VI) in Ground Water Using a Combination of Ferrous Sulfate and Sodium Dithionite: A Field Investigation.” Science and Technology, 41, 15: 5299–5305. Abstract Meckes, M.C., R.C. Haught, et al. (2007). “Impact on Water Distribution System Biofilm Densities From Reverse Osmosis Membrane Treatment of Supply Water (PDF).” (6 pp, 92 KB) Environmental Engineering & Science, 6, 4: 449–454. Miller, C.A. and P.M. Lemieux. (2007). “Emissions From the Burning of Vegetative Debris in Air Curtain Destructors (PDF).” (27 pp, 460 KB) Journal of Air & Waste Management, 57, 8: 959–968. Speth, T.F. and M.R. Schock (2007). “Removing Esoteric Contaminants From Drinking Waters: Impacts of Treatment Implementation.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, 133, 7: 665–669. EPA ReportsEvaluation of Fugitive Emissions Using Ground-Based Optical Remote Sensing Technology (PDF) (111 pp, 2.02 MB) (EPA/600/R-07/032) February 2007 Environmental Technology Verification Report, Baghouse Filtration Products, Donaldson Co., Inc., 6282 Filtration Media (PDF) (22 pp, 336 KB) (EPA/600/R-07/022) July 2007 Environmental Technology Verification Report, Baghouse Filtration Products, Donaldson Co., Inc., 6277 Filtration Media (PDF) (22 pp, 320 KB) (EPA/600/R-07/014) May 2007 Environmental Technology Verification Report, Baghouse Filtration Products, Southern Filter Media, LLC, PE-16/M-SPES Filter Sample (PDF) (22 pp, 328 KB) (EPA/600/R-07/029) February 2007 Environmental Technology Verification, Test Report of Mobile Source Emission Control Devices, Cummins Emission Solutions and Cummins Filtration Diesel Oxidation Catalyst and Closed Crankcase Ventilation System (PDF) (30 pp, 772 KB) (EPA/600/R-07/027) June 2007 Environmental Technology Verification, Test Report of Mobile Source Emission Control Devices, Flint Hills Resources, LP, CCD15010 Diesel Fuel Formulation With Hitec4121 Additive (PDF) (29 pp, 680 KB) (EPA/600/R-07/013) May 2007 |