Jump to main content.


White Lake Area of Concern

White Lake AoC location map

Background
Beneficial Use Impairments
Delisting Targets
RAP Development and Status
Significant RAP Milestones
RAP Implementation
RAP-Related Publications
Community Involvement
Partners and Stakeholders
Contacts

Exit disclaimer
NOTE: Most links on this page are pointers to other hosts and locations in the Internet. This information is provided as a service; however the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency does not endorse, approve or otherwise support these sites.

White Lake River AoC Boundary Map
White Lake River AoC Boundary Map
(PDF 699KB 1 page)
(click on map to view in separate window)
White Lake River Shape File
 

You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as a free download, to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more about PDF, and for a link to the free Acrobat Reader.

Background 

Sunset over White Lake River
Sunset over White Lake River

White Lake is a 2,570 acre coastal, drowned river mouth lake located in Muskegon County along the east shore of Lake Michigan Exit disclaimer, in the vicinity of the communities of Montague and Whitehall. The Area of Concern (AoC) includes White Lake and White River Watershed. Most of the land around the lake is wooded or grassy, with sand dunes located along Lake Michigan. Land use in the White River Watershed is primarily recreational and agricultural, with the uses around White Lake being residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural.

The Muskegon Conservation District and the Natural Resources Conservation Service assist the White Lake Public Advisory Council (PAC) by providing project staff as well as educational and technical support to coordinate and implement the Remedial Action Plan (RAP) for the White Lake AoC. For more details about the White Lake PAC, see Community/Local RAP Group Involvement below.

White Lake priorities include contaminated sediment remediation, eutrophication control, remediation of groundwater and former industrial site contamination, and wildlife habitat and population restoration. The White River priorities are eutrophication and nutrient management, and riparian corridor restoration.


Beneficial Use Impairments 

White Lake Beneficial Use Impairments

Of the 14 beneficial uses Exit disclaimer, these are impaired for White Lake:

  • Restrictions on fish and wildlife consumption
  • Eutrophication or undesirable algae
  • Restrictions on drinking water consumption, or taste and odor
  • Degradation of fish and wildlife populations
  • Degradation of aesthetics
  • Degradation of benthos
  • Restriction on dredging activities
  • Loss of fish and wildlife habitat

White Lake was originally listed as an AoC primarily due to contaminated groundwater migrating to the lake from the Occidental Chemical Site (formerly Hooker Chemical Company). There are eight other sites of contamination with the potential to affect the lake, some of them in varying states of remediation.

The RAP process identified eight of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement's 14 beneficial uses as being impaired. Beneficial use impairments (BUI) in the AoC include Restrictions on Fish and Wildlife Consumption, Loss of Fish and Wildlife Habitat, Degradation of Fish and Wildlife Populations, Degradation of Benthos, Restrictions on Dredging Activities, Restrictions on Drinking Water Consumption, or Taste and Odor Problems, and Degradation of Aesthetics.

For further information on White Lake BUIs, see the RAP documents listed in the Significant RAP Milestones section below.


Delisting Targets  Exit disclaimer

The White Lake Public Advisory Council (PAC) worked with Grand Valley State University - Annis Water Research Institute (GVSU-AWRI) to develop delisting targets for five of the eight BUIs. The targets have been approved by the PAC and will go through a technical review by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) to be officially approved.

In 2007, the Muskegon Conservation District will be working with GVSU-AWRI and other project partners to finalize delisting targets for two of the three remaining BUIs (Degradation of Fish and Wildlife Populations and Loss of Fish and Wildlife Habitat) for White Lake.

For more information regarding the development of the delisting targets, see the White Lake AoC contacts listed below.


RAP Development and Status

Dredging barge prepping for activities at the Occidental Clean-up site. In 2003, 10,500 cubic yards of contaminated sediment were removed from White Lake at the outfall eliminating the last known "hot spot" in the system
Dredging barge prepping for activities at the Occidental Clean-up site. In 2003, 10,500 cubic yards of contaminated sediment were removed from White Lake at the outfall eliminating the last known “hot spot” in the system.

White Lake was originally listed as an AoC because of venting of a groundwater plume contaminated with an organic solvent from the Occidental Chemical Company site. Analysis of recent well monitoring data indicates that the plume of contaminated groundwater moving from the site is being intercepted by the lake-front purgewell network and effectively treated prior to discharge to White Lake. Other potential sources of groundwater contamination to White Lake and its tributaries have been identified and remediation efforts are under way. Contaminated sediments have been removed at the Tannery site (approximately 85,000 cubic yards) in 2002 and at Oxy Chem / Hooker Chemical (12,000 cubic yards) in 2003.

The PAC and MDEQ are focusing on eight priority use impairments on White Lake. There was substantial improvement in the water quality of White Lake prior to 1987 simply because of the diversion of industrial and municipal discharges away from the lake by the mid-1970s. Similarly, analytical results for water samples collected in 1992 from the navigational channel between White Lake and Lake Michigan indicate that water quality has improved since the previous samples were taken in 1983. All parameters measured in 1992 met Michigan's water quality standards, established to protect human and aquatic life. Heavy metal concentrations are lower than those observed in earlier sampling, chloride concentrations are the lowest recorded since testing of this parameter began in 1963; and phosphorous and nitrogen levels have remained relatively stable since diversion of wastewater from White Lake in 1974. While a 28-day caged fish study conducted in the channel in 1992 showed that chlordane, DDE and dieldrin are present, the levels accumulated in the fish do not suggest a substantial problem.


Significant RAP Milestones   Exit disclaimer


RAP Implementation

Wetland complex at the White River outlet to White Lake. Represents largest wetland system in immediate area but is separated from White Lake due to road construction and urban development
Wetland complex at the White River outlet to White Lake. Represents largest wetland system in immediate area but is separated from White Lake due to road construction and urban development.

Shoreline of East Bay at the White Lake Tannery Site. In 2003 sediment remediation occurred at the adjacent Tannery Bay where a majority of the contaminants were located and 83,000 cubic yards were removed
Shoreline of East Bay at the White Lake Tannery Site. In 2003 sediment remediation occurred at the adjacent Tannery Bay where a majority of the contaminants were located and 83,000 cubic yards were removed.

Recent Progress and Achievements

Current Projects and Outlook

Navigational dredging in the eastern basin of White Lake and area regulated by Army Corps for sediment disposal to a Type II landfill
Navigational dredging in the eastern basin of White Lake and area regulated by Army Corps for sediment disposal to a Type II landfill.

The southern shoreline of White Lake is heavy populated but due to the topography, extensive lake shelf, and prevailing winds, large sections of natural shoreline remain. Some of these areas are providing the only remaining wetland and waterfowl habitat in the area.
The southern shoreline of White Lake is heavy populated but due to the topography, extensive lake shelf, and prevailing winds large sections of natural shoreline remain. Some of these areas are providing the only remaining wetland and waterfowl habitat in the area.

Grand Valley State University is working to complete a White Lake nutrient study; however, further funds are being sought to pinpoint locations having greatest impact to eutrophication. The study is looking at nutrient loading from groundwater sources as well as nutrient release from the sediments into White Lake. Although eutrophication is an issue in the lake, the original impetus for the study was due to a concern by members of the White Lake Association related to the excessive growth of rooted plants. In the next two years, the nutrient study will further explore the wetland dynamics of the White River system immediately upstream from the outlet to White Lake. Although White Lake has made major strides in reducing nutrient loads to the system, the PAC is striving to ensure White Lake remains a mesotrophic lake and does not become eutrophic. The Muskegon Conservation District will be working with GVSU-AWRI and other project partners to finalize the two remaining delisting targets for White Lake.

The Muskegon Conservation District recently completed the White Lake Shoreline Habitat Management Plan (PDF 3.15Mb 28 pages). This document is a companion document to the White Lake Community Action Plan (2002 RAP Update) as a means to facilitate the residents of White Lake in achieving specific fish and wildlife goals and restoring the lake as a whole. These goals are working toward an international effort to protect and manage the Great Lakes through the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.

Historically White Lake had a diverse system of shoreline habitats including coastal wetlands, freshwater marshes, wetland bays, aquatic plant beds, and shoreline stands. This unique mixture of shoreline habitats is largely attributed to White Lake being a drowned-river mouth lake with a rich distribution of flora and fauna. Since White Lake was first settled in the mid 1800s the myriad of plants and animals has gradually changed with the most dramatic changes of habitat loss occurring in the past 60 years.

This White Lake Shoreline Habitat Management Plan identifies remaining habitat to protect, and degraded habitats to revitalize and restore in the White Lake system. White Lake communities can use this plan as a blueprint to develop a common goal to designate areas that need to be conserved, preserved, and restored. The Plan can be used by these entities to ensure overall Remedial Action Plan goals for White Lake are achieved and scientific data are used in decision-making.

A White Lake & Lower White River Comprehensive Soil Erosion Plan was initiated in 2006, with a completion date expected in winter 2006-07. Identified sites around White Lake and the Lower White River will be compiled into a single plan to approach funding sources to eliminate these sources of sediment and nutrients form the White Lake ecosystem.


RAP-Related Publications


Community/Local RAP Group Involvement 

White River erosion site immediately upstream of the inlet to White contributing 248 tons of sediment to the system each year. In 2004, the PAC and Muskegon Conservation District restored the site and eliminated all erosion at the site with a grant through Great Lakes Basing Program
White River erosion site immediately upstream of the inlet to White Lake contributing 248 tons of sediment to the system each year. In 2004, the PAC and Muskegon Conservation District restored the site and eliminated all erosion at the site with a grant through Great Lakes Basing Program.

The White Lake PAC is dedicated to actively participating in the continuing improvement of the quality of White Lake. PAC coordination is being pursued through regular meetings, development of common objectives, and developing timetables and budgets for recommended actions.

Very successful public involvement and education projects in the AoC have increased public interest and actions in water quality improvements. Such projects have been ongoing regularly since the formation of the PAC and the beginning of the RAP process for White Lake. As an example, the educational research boat R/V W.G. Jackson from Grand Valley State University visits the lake and hosts hundreds of students each year for trips focusing on water quality education.


Partners and Stakeholders Exit disclaimer


White Lake River AoC Contacts

U.S. EPA RAP Liaison:
John Perrecone, RAP Coordinator
U.S. EPA - Region 5
77 W. Jackson Boulevard (G-17J)
Chicago, IL 60604
Tel:  (312) 353-1149
Fax: (312) 353-2018
Email: perrecone.john@epa.gov

State RAP Contact:
Julie Sims
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality – Water Bureau
525 W. Allegan Street
P.O. Box 30273
Lansing, MI 48909-7773
Tel:  (517) 373-2732
Fax: (517) 335-4381
Email: simsj@michigan.gov

White Lake PAC:
Norm Ulman, Chair
524 E. Colby
Whitehall, MI 49461
Email: nullman524@aol.com

Greg Mund
White Lake SPAC Representative
USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service
Muskegon Conservation District
1001 E. Wesley, Room 6
Muskegon, MI 49442
Tel:  (231) 773-0008
Fax: (231) 773-1210
Email: greg.mund@mi.usda.gov

Local Coordinator:
Jeff Auch
White Lake PAC Support Staff
Muskegon Conservation District
940 N. Van Eyck Street
Muskegon, MI 49442
Tel:  (231) 773-0008
Fax: (231) 767-1207
Email: jeff.auch@macd.org

 


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.