NOAA Home National Weather Service Home
Home News Organization Search
Communications Resources
NWS Focus
Focus Archived
Feedback
Communications Office

 

NOAA's NWS Focus
January 19, 2005 View Printer Friendly Version
CONTENTS
- NWS Updates Plans for VTEC and WBC Implementation
- NCEP's Central Operations Gets a Makeover
- Hurricane Role of River Forecast Centers Detailed
- Also On the Web.Satisfaction Index Ranks NWS
- Snapshots

 
focus cover image
Brig. Gen. D.L. Johnson, U.S. Air Force (Ret.), NWS Director shares lunch with NWS/AMS Fellowship Award Winner Corey Potvin at the 85th Annual Meeting of the American Meteorological Society (AMS) in San Diego, CA. Potvin is currently working toward a master's degree in meteorology at the University of Oklahoma. He is part of a research team evaluating the use of a denser network of small, inexpensive, low-power Doppler weather radars to help increase detection rates and lead times of tornadoes, especially those tornadoes that occur in broader wind fields. Johnson and other NOAA senior leaders also gave remarks at the opening of the NOAA exhibit at the AMS meeting. Retired Navy Vice Adm. Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Ph.D., Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and NOAA Administrator, toured the large NOAA exhibit for about 45 minutes and visited with NOAA employees working at each of the stations in the exhibit.

NWS Updates Plans for VTEC and WBC Implementation

By Deirdre Jones, Office of Science and Technology
Peter Browning, Central Region Headquarters
Rich Okulski, Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services

The NWS recently announced plans to begin a partial implementation of the Valid Time Event Code (VTEC) for five products on February 8, 2005. Also on February 8, the Storm Prediction Center begins issuing the final Watch Outline Update message (WOU), an essential element for the Watch by County (WBC) program. The initial WOU became operational on January 6, 2004.

The five VTEC products are the tornado warning (TOR), severe thunderstorm warning (SVR), severe weather statement (SVS), special marine warning (SMW), and marine weather statement (MWS).

According to the VTEC website, VTEC will allow weather providers and vendors to automate and tailor the product stream delivered to their clients, and will allow customers to select the specific message types they want to receive. VTEC will help improve automated dissemination of weather information to the public through a myriad of methods, such as paging systems and television message crawl systems, used to relay urgent severe weather and flood information.

In September and October of this year, an Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E) was conducted on AWIPS software that would be used to support VTEC. The results of the OT&E were presented at a VTEC/WBC summit meeting held on October 29, 2004. Test results were favorable for implementation of VTEC in the five products listed above, while more software development work was required for a full implementation of VTEC. Forecasters use the AWIPS WarnGen software tool to produce the five products. The products that will not become operational VTEC products are produced by all three AWIPS watch and warning software tools, WarnGen, WWA, and RiverPro. The problems with the other products range from compliance with VTEC specifications to operations concept issues.

During the VTEC/WBC Summit meeting, Matt Davis, Information Technology Officer from the Lacrosse, WI, Weather Forecast Office, demonstrated the Graphical Hazards Generation (GHG) capability within the AWIPS Graphical Forecast Editor Suite (GFE). The look and feel of GHG is very similar to that of other GFE tools, and the products tested had few if any compliance errors. Pete Browning, Central Region Meteorological Science Division Chief, led a tiger team charged with assessing and recommending a strategy for implementing VTEC using GHG as an alternative to WWA for watches and long fused warnings. The team was comprised of members from each region and key functional areas in headquarters. The GHG plan was accepted on December 3, 2004. Why should the NWS switch from WWA to GHG? The main reason is to update the warning product paradigm from county-based thinking to high resolution digital forecasts. The NWS produces experimental weather forecasts at high space and time resolutions using the GFE software application. The combination of these forecast grid elements (temperature, wind, weather, etc.) is used routinely at the Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) to generate operational NWS text-based forecast products. These same forecast elements determine the need for the issuance of a watch, warning, or advisory product. Given the time required to fix WWA software issues, provide new proficiency training and to re-test the software, it was decided to better utilize this time to implement software that is more aligned with the WFO digital forecast process.

How will GHG be implemented? There are a number of steps in the GHG implementation plan. These include development, training, testing and deployment. First, some development is needed to make sure the formatted product meets the service requirements as stated in the appropriate NWS Instructions and to provide desirable functionality that was available in WWA (such as active hazard monitoring, additional editing capabilities, etc.) A risk reduction test will begin with a dozen offices this winter to provide a problem discovery period before entering the formal OT&E in late spring 2005. End-to-end tests of the WBC watch county notification (WCN) message will be completed with the Storm Prediction Center to validate the WCN product format and test the ability for SPC to issue WOU updates based on the WCN messages. New training will be developed and provided to explain the GHG concept and provide practice using the Weather Event Simulator (WES) prior to implementation of VTEC and WBC in fall 2005.

For further information about the Watch by County Program, contact Rich Okulski, Severe Weather Service Program Manager. For information about VTEC, contact Mark Tew, Public Weather Service Program Manager. More information can also be obtained from the Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services homepage at http://www.nws.noaa.gov/os/watch/ for WBC or http://www.nws.noaa.gov/os/vtec/ for VTEC.

Back to Top


NCEP's Central Operations Gets a Makeover

As the New Year rang in, so did a new look at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction's (NCEP) Central Operations (NCO) as it consolidates five branches down to three.

For the past year, managers at NCO have been hard at work to realign staff to enhance and better support NWS computer and forecast model operations.

"The goal of NCO's makeover is to improve our information technology management and project management capabilities in order to better execute the daily systems operations and technology improvement projects to support related NOAA-wide programs and their respective mission goals," said Kevin Cooley, director of NCO.

The full integration of project management methods and capabilities into NCEP technology management, supported by the creation of a project management office, will be a key factor in delivering better support. The creation of branches that serves as centers of excellence in the core technology areas (daily operations and delivery, application integration, shared infrastructure services, and administration) is the essential aspect of the reorganization.

"These centers of technical excellence, leveraged in a multitude of combinations through the execution of projects, will drive the improved support for the NOAA National Weather Service mission objectives," Cooley added.

The makeover consolidated the current the Computing Branch and portions of the Data Management and Quality Assessment Branch into a new Systems Integration Branch (SIB). This branch, led by Maxine Brown, will focus on the integration and development of applications to support the forecast process. The Networking and Communications Branch will have a new name, the Shared Infrastructure Services Branch (SISB), and will function as a center of excellence and service for share infrastructure such as networks, servers, and databases. Tom McNeal leads the SISB.

The Production Management Branch (PMB), serving as a product delivery center of service, will continue to manage the daily delivery of model guidance products and will assume the product management role for graphics products as well. John Ward continues to lead the PMB.

The Computer Operations Branch and User Support Services Group were eliminated. Cooley said these changes will have a neutral impact on NCO's present labor budget and will not result in any reductions in force.

NCO provides 24-hour information services and operational support for NCEP's computing systems, including the network, NWS systems, workstations, and personal computers.

Back to Top


Hurricane Role of River Forecast Centers Detailed

By Jessica Harper
NWS Communications Office/Public Affairs Intern

Some of the most violent tropical storms the Southeastern United States has ever experienced challenged NOAA forecasters to keep thousands of square miles of the region up to date on flooding that resulted once the storms roared ashore during the recently concluded 2004 Atlantic Hurricane Season.

Scientists at the NWS Middle Atlantic River Forecast Center (MARFC) in State College, PA, and the Southeast River Forecast Center (SERFC) in Peachtree City, GA, collaborated with the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)'s Tropical Prediction Center (TPC), and Hydrometeorological Prediction Center (HPC) and local Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) during Hurricanes Alex, Charley, Frances, Gaston, Ivan, and Jeanne and Tropical Storms Bonnie, Hermine, and Matthew to track and provide river forecast guidance which helped to reduce damage from excessive flooding.

"This has been an unprecedented tropical storm season," Peter Ahnert, Hydrologist-in-Charge at MARFC, said. "Throughout August and September, the River Forecast Center collaborated extensively with all seven of the Weather Forecast Offices we serve to provide the highly populated Mid-Atlantic region with the best possible river flood forecasts and flash flood warnings for each storm.

"The RFCs made a number of preparations before Hurricanes Charley, Frances, and Ivan struck.

"We begin our work three, four, or even five days in advance," John Feldt, Hydrologist-in-Charge at SERFC, said. "Inland flood impacts over the southeast U.S. include flash and urban flooding, closed basin flooding, dam breaks and mudslides, in addition to main stream river flooding."

The MARFC and SERFC provided flood and high-water forecasts that ultimately benefited industry and utilities, dam operators, and recreation interests to states in the Middle Atlantic and along the Southeastern seaboard.

After Ivan made landfall, heavy rains pounded many areas, including the northern portions of the Susquehanna River Basin, causing the river levels to rise rapidly.

"Public officials in Wilkes-Barre, PA, were seriously considering the evacuation of 100,000 people in and around the city because they feared flood levees protecting the city would be overtopped," Ahnert recounted. "MARFC hydrologists, utilizing recently improved hydrologic models in combination with many years of experience, conveyed confidence to the Binghamton, NY, Weather Forecast Office (WFO) forecasters that the river would crest several feet below the top of the levees. WFO Binghamton immediately relayed the new forecast to the city, which was a major relief to city officials. They also briefed the Department of Homeland Security on the situation. The decision not to evacuate saved the city millions of dollars and spared its citizens unnecessary worry and inconvenience.

"David Nicosia, Warning Coordination Meteorologist (WCM) at WFO Binghamton, attributes the success at Wilkes-Barre to the confidence the RFCs provided NWS meteorologists.

"During the Ivan flood, the support of the RFCs was critical to the success of NWS," Nicosia said. "The RFCs routing technology is paramount to the NWS' victories during hurricane season. The RFCs gave us the confidence to make better projections during briefings."

Employees from the MARFC, SERFC and other river forecast centers contributed to pre-hurricane briefings arranged by the NHC's Hurricane Liaison Team. This team gave a projected overview of how rivers and streams would respond to the storms heavy rains.

Apart from participating in briefings, many RFC forecasters put in extremely long hours before, during, and after each hurricane to provide their region with the best service possible.

"We change our focus before and during a hurricane by extending a workday to 24 hours and adding resources to normal operations," Feldt said. "The SERFC coordinates with a wide variety of partners, providing briefings to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Army Corps and Engineers, U.S. Geological Survey, State Divisions of Emergency Management, Water Management Districts, and others."

Although most hurricanes, in recent years, have affected the southeastern states, it is not uncommon for the Middle Atlantic and New England states to experience either the full impact or after-effect of these storms. Over fifty percent of the hurricane deaths and much of the damage is the result of flooding.

"Most people know about the work the NWS does with tornado and hurricane forecasting, but they are unfamiliar with the RFCs' impact on flood and flash flood forecasting," said Gary Carter, Director of Hydrological Development (OHD), NWS Headquarters. "We need to educate the public about how and why the RFCs support and collaborate within the NWS."

Part of this education effort came to fruition in April 2004 when The Weather Channel (TWC) broadcasted the Forecast Earth feature Water's Fury. The 22-minute episode was commissioned by the NWS and produced in collaboration with TWC. It focused on the NWS' role as the Nation's sole provider of hydrologic forecast information and the modernization and enhancement of hydrologic services through the implementation of the Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service (AHPS). The role of the RFCs in the production of valuable forecast information for river and flash floods and water management was highlighted. "AHPS is incorporating new advanced modeling capabilities and probabilistic forecasting, in addition to improved display and dissemination via web based displays." Ahnert said.

"AHPS implementation continues. AHPS has already resulted in improvements in river forecast accuracy from new and better calibrated models. An example of where we are headed in the near future can be seen in flood inundation mapping systems being tested by SERFC and MARFC," he added. "People will be able to go online, see a detailed map of their town, and see whether or not flood waters will reach their neighborhood.

"As part of the river forecast process, MARFC and SERFC work closely with NCEP's HPC to produce quantitative precipitation forecasts to evaluate when, where and how much rain will fall. Other data needed to produce river forecasts include temperature and evaporation observations and forecasts and observations of tides, reservoir inflow and outflow, and river flow or height. The RFCs receive their observed data from many different sources including the US Geological Survey and the NWS Cooperative Observer program.

The RFCs use these data in the NWS River Forecast System, which takes into account watershed features such as topography, vegetation, river channel and valley shape, soil properties, and land use in the production of short and extended range stream flow forecasts, and Flash Flood Guidance.

Whether they collaborate with other offices within the NWS and NOAA, or with outside federal, state, and local agencies, the RFCs are constantly partnering with other organizations to secure the well-being of the people they serve.

"The secret to our success is that we are always ready and willing to work with the WFOs," Feldt said. "The WFOs are specialists on a local level. At SERFC, we do our best to assist them by providing a hydrological science perspective and regional picture that are broader in scope."

Back to Top


Also On the Web.Satisfaction Index Ranks NWS

The NWS received a score of 77 on the annual University of Michigan American Customer Satisfaction Index of Federal agencies. Users of hydrologic services provided the responses for the NWS score. The 77 score is in line with past scores the NWS received from other customer groups, including emergency managers (80), aviation (77), marine and coastal (78), and media (76).

The Government average was 72.1, and the top rated agency was the National Cemetery Administration with a 95. On the low end was the Internal Revenue Service with scores between 51 and 64. View these and other 2004 scores here.

Back to Top


Snapshots

Click here for a look at photos we've received from around the NWS.

Back to Top


Take a look at other NWS news, as submitted for the NOAA Weekly Report.

Click here to take a look at NOAA-wide employee news, as posted in the latest issue of AccessNOAA.
Have news you'd like to spread using NOAA's NWS Focus? Have feedback on how we can improve NOAA's NWS Focus and employee communications? We want to hear from you! E-mail us at NWS.Focus@noaa.gov.

Click here for guidelines on how to prepare articles and photographs for submission to NOAA's NWS Focus.

 

Communications Office COM Resources NOAA's NWS Focus Weekly Reports Feedback    

 

     

Send questions and comments to NWS.Communications.Office@noaa.gov or mail to:

National
Weather Service
Communications Office
ATTN: W/COM
1325 East-West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910-3283