Skip to main content
Skip to sub-navigation
About USAID Our Work Locations Policy Press Business Careers Stripes Graphic USAID Home
USAID: From The American People Transition Initiatives Women in Wonokromo, Indonesia, meet on a regular basis to discuss and share health and childcare information that helps to ensure healthy mothers and babies  - Click to read this story
Transition Initiatives Home »
About Transition Initiatives »
Country Programs »
Focus Areas »
Summary of Program Activities »
Publications »
Staff »
Employment »
Links »
Frequently Asked Questions »
Site Map »
Transition Initiatives Country Programs: Croatia

OTI / Croatia Home

Program Summary - November 2000

Country Reports

 

Final evaluation of OTI's programs in Bosnia and Croatia (PDF, 202k)

Get Acrobat Reader...

Search the Transition Initiatives site
Search



USAID/OTI Croatia Field Report

January 2000


Country Situation

The parliamentary elections held on January 3, 2000 will be considered a milestone in Croatia's history. The 78 percent voter turnout was the highest since the 1990 elections for independence. By all accounts the election was run in an orderly and professional manner with no attempts to change or influence the results. The outcome was a huge defeat for the HDZ ruling party. The opposition coalition won in all but one district and with the Diaspora, but ended up a few seats shy of the majority needed to make constitutional changes. The HDZ has completely collapsed with recriminations throughout the party because of the overwhelming defeat. This had a carryover effect on the presidential election with the early favorite, Mate Granic (HDZ) coming in a distant third behind the coalition candidate, Drazan Budisa, and the surprise front runner Stipe Mesic. The strong showing of Mr. Mesic, who came from nowhere in a few short weeks, is yet another demonstration of the newfound power of the Croatian electorate. At this point, the runoff between Mr. Mesic and Mr. Budisa is too close to call. Croatia, however, is in the enviable position that either candidate will be competent and progressive.

The new parliament has already earned some favorable reviews after one week in office. The mood of optimism and change has been kept alive by the refusal of most senior officials' to accept government vehicles, proposed salary cuts for members of parliament and the incarceration of the notorious tycoon, Miroslav Kutle and several former Ministers for misappropriation of funds. In another incident, one of the last acts of Vlatko Pavletic (interim president) was to accept the resignation of General Ljubo Cesic Rojs, who was rumored to be behind the smear campaign against Stipe Mesic during the first round of the presidential campaign. Mr. Pavletic may emerge as a quiet hero for his leadership during the time between President Tudjman's death and the start of the new government.

Another important trend is the reduced role of the minority slate of candidates. The Serb party was allocated only one seat (out of 151 seats) compared to three seats (out of 120) in the last parliamentary election, and as a result, the overwhelming majority (70-90 percent) of the Serb population chose to vote on the main ticket.

One final note on old habits dying hard -- it took almost two weeks after the parliamentary elections for the news media to realize that the HDZ and its members were no longer the top news story.

OTI HIGHLIGHTS

A. Narrative Summary

OTI is limiting new project funding as it starts its program close-out. A few new grants will be signed in early February for projects that were ready in December, but delayed due to the demand of the pre-election campaign. The main focus is the transfer of OTI staff and grant making mechanisms to the USAID mission in Croatia.

B. Grants Activity Summary

More than 236 grants, valued in excess of $3,614,402 to over 89 civic-based organizations.

Media Development PTGs: 80 (Total Est. Value: $ 1,516,731)

Civic Org. Development PTGs: 156 (Total Est. Value: $ 2,097,671)

New PTGs signed this period: 2 (Total Est. cost: $ 71,269)

Media-0 ($0); Civil- 2 ($71,269)

C. Coordination

Support to the GONG election monitoring campaign continues as a coordinated effort between several donors including OTI, Freedom House, NED and the Open Society Institute. The coordination is directed by the GONG staff at their national headquarters rather than by the donors themselves.

D. Other Key Concerns

OTI chose to minimize support for any Get Out the Vote (GOTV) activities during the presidential campaign for a variety of reasons, including lack of perceived need and a strong concern that it would be extremely difficult for the coalition, GLAS 99, to remain non-partisan.

Other donors did not share this opinion with the result that GLAS formed a new coalition, GLAS 2000, that undertook a partisan campaign against the HDZ candidate, Mate Granic. This was highlighted in the OSCE report on the first round of presidential elections. GLAS 2000 has kept a lower profile for the second round of presidential elections and is working to repair the damage created by the partisan nature of the previous campaign.

PROGRESS TOWARD OBJECTIVES

The targets stated in the previous report (GONG fielding between 4,000 and 5,000 monitors and the GOTV campaign contributing to a minimum 70% voter turnout) were met and the results have exceeded expectations. USAID/OTI is working to make sure that gains made, especially the increased visibility of civil society as an important participant in the democratic process, are not lost. The incredible success of GONG has changed the NGO landscape almost overnight. NGOs are no longer perceived as subversive enemies of the state, and volunteering is not seen as a throwback to the communist collective.

Back to Top ^

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:32:59 -0500
Star