HUD and PD&R Publications
 
My Cart   |  HUD Home  |  HUD USER Home
Search   Advanced Search
 
First time visitor
Contact Us
FAQ
 
 
Series of images depicting different types of housing.
An animated link to the Map gallery


Firstgov logo



 
Start of Main Content

Privatization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Desirability and Feasibility (May 1996, 212 p.)

Send URL to FriendSend this to a friend
ORDER

FULL TEXT:*
* Adobe Acrobat
(*.pdf, 587 KB)

* Executable (*.exe) -- charts

By providing a stable source of liquidity for mortgage credit markets and offering borrowers access to capital markets, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have played a prominent role in the development of a highly efficient secondary market for home mortgages. The government-sponsored enterprises' (GSEs') success in fulfilling their original missions has prompted some privatization advocates to argue that the secondary market for single-family mortgages could operate efficiently without Federal sponsorship. However, Privatization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Desirability and Feasibility, a new report from HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research, finds that the vital public purposes of the GSEs could be undermined by privatization.

While the GSEs are not backed by an explicit Federal guarantee, the capital markets regard them as holding an "implicit guarantee" that privatization would remove. A change in status could affect mortgage markets in several ways. The costs of borrowing and credit enhancement -- typically lower for the GSEs -- would likely increase. Private firms that currently are securitizing nonconforming loans could compete with the GSEs within the conforming market.

Privatizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could push conforming mortgage interest rates up between one-quarter and two-fifths of a percent, the report projects, reversing recent improvements in affordable lending and increasing homeownership rates, particularly for households traditionally underserved by the mortgage market. Privatization would also have important implications for the public purposes set out in Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's Federal charters, and would likely undermine the federally mandated goals set by HUD for GSE purchases of mortgage originations to underserved populations.

HUD finds that the GSEs' public purposes provide a substantial rationale for the current GSE system, and that none of the arguments cited by privatization advocates are compelling enough to support terminating their Federal charters.

*The online version of the publication "Privatization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Desirability and Feasibility" has been separated into two files. The file entitled "Privatization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (*.pdf)" contains the text of the report in Adobe Acrobat format. The file "Charts (*.xls, *.exe)" is a self-extracting file that contains the charts, graphs, and tables in Excel and Harvard Graphics formats. To obtain a hard copy of this report or for technical assistance in downloading this document, please contact HUD USER at 1-800-245-2691.



spacer

Content updated on 03/31/05   Back to Top Back to Top
 If you do not have the Adobe Acrobat Reader program already installed on your computer to view PDF files, CLICK HERE to download the free reader.
HUD logo HUD USER, P.O. Box 23268, Washington, DC 20026-3268
Toll Free: 1-800-245-2691 TDD: 1-800-927-7589
Local: 1-202-708-3178 Fax: 1-202-708-9981
Home Icon
HUD USER Home
Privacy Statement