Inmate Worker Related FAQs
1. Why should inmates be given an opportunity to work?2. What specific skills do inmates learn working in FPI?
3. Why can't the Bureau of Prisons simply expand its vocational training program?
1. Why should inmates be given an opportunity to work?
It is important to remember, first and foremost, that individuals are sent to prison AS punishment and not FOR punishment. Punishment in the form of a prison term includes the elements of deterrence, retribution, incapacitation, and rehabilitation. Forcing prisoners to perform harsh, strenuous, and meaningless labor does not meet the goals of a modern correctional system.
Nowhere in Federal law does it provide that offenders should be restricted from meaningful, productive work opportunities as part of their sentence. In fact, Federal statute specifically requires all able-bodied inmates to work in some capacity. Today, prison work is recognized for its rehabilitative potential.
When inmates perform productive work, they acquire marketable skills, ranging from a basic work ethic to trade-specific expertise. These skills improve self-esteem and enhance the prospect for post-release success.
2. What specific skills do inmates learn working in FPI?
In addition to the trade-specific skills listed below, FPI teaches inmates the most marketable skill of all - how to work. No matter what the job, employers seek candidates who possess a basic work ethic, and the FPI program fosters a work environment in which inmate workers learn to be dependable, responsible team players, who take direction from their supervisors and take pride in their accomplishments. A survey by the National Association of Manufacturers indicated that employers place the highest priority on job applicants possessing these basic employability skills.
Clothing & Textiles
Electronics
Fleet Management
General
Industrial Products |
Office Furniture
Recycled Electronic Products
Services |
3. Why can't the Bureau of Prisons simply expand its vocational training program?
The Bureau of Prisons is an active supporter of vocational training programs; however, expanding the BOP’s vocational training program is an insufficient substitute for the FPI program for the following reasons:
(1) While vocational training programs offer inmates an opportunity to learn a skill or trade, classroom instruction is no substitute for sustained “live” work experience;
(2) The average sentence length for a federal inmate is 8 years. The average vocational training program duration is 18-24 months. Thus, vocational training must be a complement to, not a substitute for real work; and
(3) FPI does not receive any appropriated funding. To support an expanded vocational training program, the BOP would have to request, from Congress, a significant increase in appropriated funds.