Ownership, sufficient to exercise ``control,'' of course, exists
where total ownership is vested in a single person, family unit,
partnership, corporation, or other single business organization.
Ownership sufficient to exercise ``control'' exist also where there is
more than 50 percent ownership of voting stock. (See West v. Wal-Mart,
264 F. Supp. 168 (W.D. Ark.).) But ``control'' may exist with much more
limited ownership, and, in certain cases exists in the absence of any
ownership. The mere ownership of stock in a corporation does not by
itself establish the existence of the ``control'' referred to in the
definition. The question whether the ownership in a particular case
includes the right to exercise the requisite ``control'' will
necessarily depend upon all the facts in the light of the statutory
provisions.
