[NIFL-FOBASICS:1486] RE: Expertise in Low Literacy

From: PHCSJean.2164047@bloglines.com
Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 - 17:22:22 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j86LMMG12100; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:22:22 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:22:22 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1126041602.2289188464.25463.sendItem@bloglines.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: PHCSJean.2164047@bloglines.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:1486] RE: Expertise in Low Literacy
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="utf-8"
Status: O
Content-Length: 461
Lines: 15

Andres-
I think this would be too broad. I want to find something that they
feel they are special at; something that they would consider themselves extra
good at. Maybe if I said special knowledge--although in an earlier post someone
mentioned mechanical abilities. I wonder if the mechanic would consider that
knowledge. They might. Hmmmm....Maybe I should reconsider this.
Jean

---
nifl-fobasics@nifl.gov wrote:
Can you just call it knowledge?
> 
> Andres



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:49:34 EST