Appellate Section
TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964
-
Colwell v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Svcs. (9th Cir.) -- Appellee
-
Plaintiffs lack standing to maintain this action
-
Plaintiffs' claims are not ripe for review
-
Ayers v. Musgrove (5th Cir.) -- Appellee
-
The district court did not abuse its discretion when it approved the settlement
agreement
-
The district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the motion to
opt out of the class
-
ProEnglish, et al. v. George W. Bush,
et al. (4th Cir.) -- Appellee
-
The district court applied the correct legal standard when dismissing the case
for lack of subjct matter jurisdiction
-
The plaintiffs' claims challenging Executive Order 13,166 and agency policy
guidance documents that clarify longstanding interpretation of Title VII and
implementing regulations are ripe for judicial review
-
Peters v. Jenney (4th Cir.) -- Amicus
-
Private right of action exists to enforce anti-retaliation prohibition of Title
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
-
Robinson v. Kansas (10th Cir.) -- Intervenor
-
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is valid exercise of the Spending
Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment
-
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act is valid exercise of the Spending
Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment
-
No Eleventh Amendment immunity to Title VI and Section 504 actions
-
Cuffley and Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. Mickes (8th Cir.) -- Amicus
-
State would violate Title VI if it grants the Klan's application to participate
in the Adopt-A-Highway program
-
District court erred in concluding that an Adopt-A-Highway program regulates
expressive activity, and in applying a "forum" analysis applicable to speech
restrictions
-
Cureton v. NCAA (3d Cir.) -- Amicus
-
Coverage of NCAA by Title VI
-
Broad definition of "program" in Civil Rights Restoration Act applies to
Title VI discriminatory effects regulations
-
Powell v. Ridge (3d Cir.) -- Amicus
-
Private right of action to enforce Title VI discriminatory effects standard
-
Application of Title VI discriminatory effects standard to state formula for
funding education
-
Sandoval v. Hagan (11th Cir.) -- Intervenor/Amicus
-
Title VI is valid exercise of the Spending Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment
-
No Eleventh Amendment immunity to Title VI actions
-
May enforce Title VI against state officials in their official capacities
(Ex parte Young)
-
Private right of action to enforce Title VI discriminatory effects standard
-
English-only laws' discriminatory effect on the basis of national origin
Browse Briefs by Category
Affirmative Action
Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504
of the Rehabilitation Act
Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act
Constitutionality of Federal Statutes
Criminal
Education
Employment Discrimination (Race, National Origin, Sex,
and Religion)
Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act
Housing
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Religion Cases
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Voting
Other
Updated July 25, 2008
