Table 5-33 |
Ownership of academic intellectual
property in OECD countries: 2003 |
|
|
|
Owner of invention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country |
University |
Faculty |
Government |
|
Status/recent initiatives |
|
Australia |
x |
na |
na |
|
|
Austria |
x |
na |
na |
|
|
Belgium |
x |
na |
na |
|
|
Canadaa |
x |
x |
na |
|
|
Denmark |
x |
na |
na |
|
|
Finland |
na |
x |
na |
|
Consideration of legislation in 2003 to restrict
faculty's
right to retain ownership of publicly funded research. |
France |
x |
na |
na |
|
|
Germany |
x |
na |
na |
|
Debate during 2001 over awarding ownership to universities. |
Iceland |
na |
x |
na |
|
|
Ireland |
x |
na |
na |
|
|
Italy |
na |
x |
na |
|
Legislation passed in 2001 to give ownership rights
to
researchers. Legislation introduced in 2002 to grant
ownership to universities and create technology transfer offices.
|
Japanb |
na |
x |
o |
|
Private technology transfer offices authorized
in 1998. |
Mexico |
x |
na |
na |
|
|
Netherlands |
x |
na |
na |
|
|
Norway |
na |
x |
na |
|
Legislation passed in 2003 to allow universities
to retain
ownership of publicly funded research. |
Poland |
x |
na |
na |
|
|
South Korea |
x |
na |
na |
|
|
Sweden |
na |
x |
na |
|
Recent debate and consideration of legislation
to allow
universities to retain ownership of publicly funded research. |
United Kingdom |
x |
o |
na |
|
Universities, rather than government, given rights
to faculty
inventions in 1985. |
United Statesc |
x |
o |
o |
|
|
|
|
|
x legal basis or most common practice
o allowed by law/rule but less common
na not applicable aOwnership of intellectual
property funded by institutional funds varies, but publicly funded
intellectual property belongs to institution performing research.
bPresident of the national university or interuniversity
institution determines right to ownership of invention by faculty
member, based on discussions by invention committee. cUniversities
have first right to elect title to inventions resulting from federally
funded research. Federal Government may claim title if university
does not. In certain cases, inventor may retain rights with agreement
of university/Federal partner and Government.
SOURCES: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD
Questionnaire on the Patenting and Licensing Activities of PRO’s
(Paris, 2002); and D. C. Mowery and B. N. Sampat, International emulation
of Bayh-Dole: Rash or rational? Paper presented at American Association
for the Advancement of Science symposium on International Trends in
the Transfer of Academic Research, Boston, February 2002. |
|
Science & Engineering Indicators
2004 |
|
Source Links:
Source data
|
|