|
R&D rank |
|
R&D expense ($ millions) |
|
Sales ($ millions) |
|
R&D intensity (%) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081107200509im_/http://nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/graphics/1pix.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081107200509im_/http://nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/graphics/1pix.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081107200509im_/http://nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/graphics/1pix.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081107200509im_/http://nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/graphics/1pix.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081107200509im_/http://nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/graphics/1pix.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081107200509im_/http://nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/graphics/1pix.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081107200509im_/http://nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/graphics/1pix.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081107200509im_/http://nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/graphics/1pix.gif) |
Company (country) |
2003 |
2002 |
|
2003 |
2002 |
Change (%) |
|
2003 |
2002 |
|
2003 |
2002 |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081107200509im_/http://nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/graphics/1pix.gif) |
Microsofta (United States) |
1 |
10 |
|
7,779 |
6,595 |
17.0 |
|
36,835 |
32,187 |
|
21.1 |
20.5 |
Ford Motor (United States) |
2 |
1 |
|
7,500 |
7,700 |
-2.6 |
|
164,196 |
162,586 |
|
4.6 |
4.7 |
Pfizer (United States) |
3 |
6 |
|
7,131 |
5,176 |
37.8 |
|
45,188 |
32,373 |
|
15.8 |
16.0 |
DaimlerChrysler (Germany) |
4 |
2 |
|
6,689 |
7,289 |
-8.2 |
|
163,811 |
179,595 |
|
4.1 |
4.1 |
Toyota Motor (Japan) |
5 |
5 |
|
6,210 |
6,113 |
1.6 |
|
157,411 |
146,121 |
|
3.9 |
4.2 |
Siemens (Germany) |
6 |
3 |
|
6,084 |
6,987 |
-12.9 |
|
89,127 |
100,873 |
|
6.8 |
6.9 |
General Motors (United States) |
7 |
4 |
|
5,700 |
5,800 |
-1.7 |
|
183,244 |
184,214 |
|
3.1 |
3.1 |
Matsushita Electric Industrial (Japan) |
8 |
9 |
|
5,272 |
5,015 |
5.1 |
|
68,078 |
67,368 |
|
7.7 |
7.4 |
International Business Machines (United States) |
9 |
7 |
|
5,068 |
4,750 |
6.7 |
|
89,131 |
81,186 |
|
5.7 |
5.9 |
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) |
10 |
8 |
|
4,910 |
5,101 |
-3.8 |
|
37,717 |
37,314 |
|
13.0 |
13.7 |
Johnson & Johnson (United States) |
11 |
12 |
|
4,684 |
3,957 |
18.4 |
|
41,862 |
36,298 |
|
11.2 |
10.9 |
Sony (Japan) |
12 |
14 |
|
4,683 |
4,033 |
16.1 |
|
68,230 |
68,023 |
|
6.9 |
5.9 |
Nokia (Finland) |
13 |
22 |
|
4,514 |
3,664 |
23.2 |
|
35,365 |
36,038 |
|
12.8 |
10.2 |
Intel (United States) |
14 |
11 |
|
4,360 |
4,034 |
8.1 |
|
30,141 |
26,764 |
|
14.5 |
15.1 |
Volkswagen (Germany) |
15 |
25 |
|
4,233 |
3,471 |
22.0 |
|
104,639 |
104,393 |
|
4.0 |
3.3 |
Honda Motor (Japan) |
16 |
15 |
|
4,086 |
3,976 |
2.8 |
|
74,293 |
72,554 |
|
5.5 |
5.5 |
Motorola (United States) |
17 |
13 |
|
3,771 |
3,754 |
0.5 |
|
27,058 |
26,679 |
|
13.9 |
14.1 |
Novartis (Switzerland) |
18 |
24 |
|
3,756 |
3,362 |
11.7 |
|
24,864 |
25,111 |
|
15.1 |
13.4 |
Roche Holding (Switzerland) |
19 |
27 |
|
3,694 |
3,298 |
12.0 |
|
24,188 |
23,030 |
|
15.3 |
14.3 |
Hewlett-Packard (United States) |
20 |
19 |
|
3,652 |
3,312 |
10.3 |
|
73,061 |
56,588 |
|
5.0 |
5.9 |
|