Mercury Cycling in
Aquatic
Ecosystems
|
The Wisconsin District Mercury Studies Team is
currently funded by the Toxic Substances Hydrology Program of the USGS to conduct a general examination of
mercury in the environment called Mercury Cycling in Aquatic Ecosystems. This multidiciplinary, national investigation is designed to examine
geologic sources, historical trends in deposition, biogeochemical cycling processes, biological uptake, and biological effects of mercury in aquatic ecosystems.
|
|
Project Description
Mercury is a problem of global extent because of the
dominantly atmospheric pathways by which it is transported to
even the most remote locations, and because naturally occurring
processes convert a portion of mercury in aquatic ecosystems into
methylmercury, a potent neurotoxin. In fact, if methylmercury
were not produced in the environment, there probably would be no
"mercury problem". Concerns about environmental mercury pollution
and contamination of aquatic food webs stem largely from the
human and wildlife health risks of dietary exposure to
methylmercury, the dominant form of mercury in the edible flesh
of fish and aquatic mammals. The wide-spread nature and adverse
consequences of mercury pollution continue to prompt considerable
scientific investigation, and the environmental sources,
biogeochemistry, transformations, transport, fate, and effects of
mercury in the environment are subjects of frequent symposia,
workshops, and a large, steadily expanding body of scientific
literature. The Mercury in Aquatic Ecosystems project,
coordinated by the Wisconsin District Mercury Research Laboratory
(WDMRL) has several overall goals that seek to provide critical
information to aid in the definition of the mercury problem and
seek possible solutions or mitigation strategies. These goals
are: (A) to clarify the broader mercury problem from a scientific
perspective; (B) conduct research that will provide critical (but
previously unavailable) information for resource managers and
decision makers on what should be done to improve environmental
Hg conditions; (C) continue to provide scientific leadership
(within the USGS and nationally and internationally) for the
planning and execution of investigations of mercury
biogeochemistry, transformations, transport, and fate in the
environment; and (D) serve as an intra-agency and inter-agency
communication and coordination point for mercury research.
Currently the Mercury Studies Team is working on a series of
linked projects to accomplished these goals:
|
Project Objectives
- Acquire national information inventories on mercury sources
- Design and conduct regional assessments to determine patterns (and controlling factors) of mercury contamination in the
nation's aquatic ecosystems
- Execute ecosystem investigations to determine the processes
and factors influencing methylmercury exposure in aquatic
ecosystems
- Conduct toxicological studies to determine the significance
of methylmercury exposure in fish-eating wildlife, with emphasis
on reproductive effects
|
Project Links
|
Publications
|
|
Project Description
There is a broad consensus among mercury experts that
the most widespread cause of high fish MeHg concentrations is
elevated atmospheric deposition of mercury to lakes and their
watersheds. Emissions from the US Midwest and southeastern Canada
are transported and deposited in both countries in a pattern
similar to the deposition of sulfuric and nitric acids. In
addition, there is increased global circulation of Hg in the
atmosphere and increased deposition even in remote locations. One
of the major sources of anthropogenicmercury is mercury emitted
from coal-fired utilities, and controls on these emissions have
recently been proposed. On a North American basis, the estimated
cost of these controlswould be several billion dollars per year
(EPA, 1998). Despite these moves towards controls, mercury
experts are in agreement that the relationship between
atmospheric mercury deposition and MeHg concentrations in fish is
unknown. Although emission reductions of 50% have been proposed
(Conference of New England State Governors and Maritime Province
Premiers), there is no understanding of whether this reduction
would be inadequate or more than necessary, and this could result
in the waste of billions of dollars on control technologies. The
uncertainty comes from the fact that the amount of stored Hg in
ecosystems is many times greater than annual deposition. If the
newly deposited Hg is much more bioavailable than the stored Hg,
ecosystems will respond quickly (1-2 yr.) to changes in
atmospheric deposition, but if all the Hg is equally
bioavailable, response time will be very slow.
|
|
We are addressing these fundamental questions by
adding trace amounts of inorganic mercury (HgII) to ELA Lake 658
and its watershed at the Experimental Lakes Area (ELA),
northwestern Ontario over a two or three-year period. The ELA is
situated in a region of low atmospheric deposition of mercury,
and we plan to temporarily increase the Hg loading to a small ELA
watershed by a factor of 4 to simulate the atmospheric loading of
mercury to lakes in Eastern Canada (Southern Ontario and the
Maritime Provinces). This is a whole-ecosystem experiment, which,
in addition to following changes in MeHg concentration of fish,
will examine other key biological and chemical processes that
determine the rate of MeHg production and its bioaccumulation
into fish.
The USGS research on this project is funded by the
TOXICS program, and is primarily focused on the biogeochemcial
processing and transport of the mercury isotopes that are
delivered to the upland forests and the wetland, and then to the
lake itself. We have instrumented the water shed with four flow
monitoring and automated sampling stations that take runoff
samples in response to rain event, which typically arrive
suddenly and do not allow for adequate time get to the field site
to sample during storms. In addition, we have water level
recorders in the lake and wetland, which will be essential to
calculating hydrologic and mercury isotope mass
balances.
|
Project Links
|
Photos taken during field work for the
ELA project
|
|
Project Description
Mercury contamination of environment and
toxicological exposure to wildlife and humans is a complex
problem that is unlike any other contaminant issue mankind has
ever been confronted with, and requires a special level of
holistic, interdisciplinary research before we will be able to
take effective steps toward improving environmental conditions.
First, it is unique among all known elements in that at ambient
pressure and temperature its stable phase is as a metallic liquid
that is highly vaporous. Thus, unlike all other heavy metals of
general concern, it is effectively distributed in the gaseous
state to literally any location, including sensitive ecosystems.
Second, because mercury is an element, releases from both natural
and anthropogenic sources are difficult to discriminate and
mutually accumulate in various pools in the environment
(primarily soils and sediments) where unlike most other
contaminants of widespread concern it does not degrade over time
and potentially presents a contamination problem for very long
periods of time. Third, unlike most contaminants where
biogeochemical processes generally serve to moderate its
expressed toxicity, several key natural processes actually served
to exacerbate mercury toxicity by converting it to methylmercury,
a highly potent neurotoxin that is the focus of most
environmental mercury research today. In fact, if mercury were
not methylated in the environment, there essentially would be no
mercury problem, and as such the "mercury problem" is really a
"methylmercury problem". Mercury methylation is the net result of
a vexing series of physical, chemical and microbiological
processes, which in an unfortunate twist originate at or near the
base of food webs in aquatic ecosystems and effectively serve to
"inject" it into the food web from the point of orgination.
Although mercury methylation is the focus of intense research
currently, it is still poorly understood especially at the
national scale. The challenge currently confronting resource
managers, lawmakers, and the scientific community at large is to
bring this complex problem into a more complete understanding
that will allow for the proper and responsible actions to not
only reduce new releases to the environment, but also prescribe
effective land management strategies to deal with existing
inventories.
This proposal seeks to bring together the expertise of an
interdisciplinary team of scientists and programs to execute an
integrated monitoring and research plan that will take a holistic
approach toward examining mercury cycling and bioaccumulation at
a set of NAWQA [hot link to NAWQA program] watersheds across the
United States, which exhibit widely ranging ecosystem conditions,
mercury sources, and biological components (food webs). The
project employs the combined talents, interests, and funding of
scientists from the NAWQA, Toxics, and NRP programs of the Water
Resources Discipline, as well as scientists and programs from the
Biological Resources Discipline of the USGS. In essence, this
proposal distills the "mercury problem" down two three forcing
functions that we believe control mercury toxicity in aquatic
ecosystems: source characterization, apportionment and
quantification; the biogeochemical processes that lead to the
formation of methylmercury; and, the introduction of
methylmercury into the food web (bioaccumulation) and
biomagnification steps that follow. These three forcing functions
are referred to here as the Mercury Triad. Our overall research
objective is to determine what environmental and biological
factors govern the methylation of mercury and its resulting
bioaccumulation in aquatic ecosystems. We have identified five
NAWQA study basins (CONN, GAFL, WMIC, WILM, and NVBR) that
present a unique opportunity to extend the three apices of the
Mercury Triad in such a way that we be able elucidate the
relative importance of these forcing functions under varying
environmental conditions. A primary strength of this proposed
effort is the adoption of a consistent set of research questions
and field and laboratory methods that will be applied to each of
the study basins, such that the results will not only be
comparable among basins but transferable to other locations in
the US.
|
Project Objectives
- Evaluate if trends in mercury accumulation and methylmercury
production can be identified at national and regional scales
across the United States
- To identify ecosystem characteristics that favor the
production and bioaccumulation of methylmercury.
- Study design looks at a national scope with emphasis on
multimedia sample collection (water, sediment, and predator fish)
with consistent use of trace metal clean sampling methods and
low-level mercury and methylmercury analytical procedures.
|
Project Collaborators
|
Project Sampling Sites
|
National Maps
|
|
Project Description
Studies worldwide have shown that mercury (Hg) is a
ubiquitous contaminant, reaching even the most remote
environments such as high-altitude lakes via atmospheric
pathways. However, very few studies have been conducted to assess
Hg contamination levels of these systems. The study area consists
of ninety-three mid-latitude, high-altitude lakes from seven
national parks in the western United States which were sampled in
September, 1999 for basic water quality parameters, carbon gases
and mercury. In addition to the synoptic survey, routine
monitoring and experimental studies were conducted at one of the
lakes (Mills Lake) to quantify MeHg flux rates and important
process rates such as photo-demethylation.
|
|
Project Objectives
- Acquire data from an array of high-altitude lakes from across
the western United States for the purposes of providing a
baseline on the current Hg and MeHg contamination levels of these
sensitive ecosystems.
- Provide a detailed assessment of photo-demethylation as a
protective agent for high-altitude lakes.
- Construction of a seasonal mass-balance for MeHg for one of
the study lakes by conducting a more detailed assessment
including repeated sampling of the lake, stream inflow and
outflow, and sediment coring.
|
Major Findings
Our synoptic sampling effort of 90 mid-latitude,
high-altitude lakes from eight national parks in the western
United States during a four-week period in September 1999 showed
that overall these ecosystems have low Hg and MeHg levels (1.07
and 0.05 ng L-1, respectively). Compared to most other studies,
we observed a very good correlation of Hg to MeHg (r2= 0.82),
suggesting that inorganic Hg(II) loading is a primary controlling
factor of MeHg production in mountain lakes, and that any future
changes to atmospheric Hg loads would likely be detected in these
sensitive systems. Positive correlations were also observed for
DOC and both Hg and MeHg, although to a much lesser degree.
Glacier National Park, Montana, had the lowest overall MeHg
levels we observed (0.02 ng L-1), and we suspect this is related
to naturally elevated pH values in the lakes there, although
among the national parks sampled pH exhibited a relatively narrow
range of values and showed little control of either HgT or MeHg.
A more detailed study of Hg and MeHg was conducted at Mills Lake,
Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. This study showed rates
of photo-demethylation were quite fast, and this process was of
equal importance to sedimentation and stream flow for removing
MeHg. We suspect that enhanced rates of photo-demethylation are
likely an important reason why high-altitude lakes, with
typically high water clarity and sunlight exposure, are low in
MeHg.
|
Project Collaborators
|
Photos of Field Sampling in the Rocky Mountains (Click photo thumbnail to view a full-size photo)
|
|
Project Description
Although all ecosystems on the planet are surficially
contaminated with mercury to some degree, generally the most
remote locations are the least contaminated. However, very little
is known about the actual contamination levels of extremely
remote locations such as the Yukon Basin, and establishing an
accurate baseline for such locations is important for monitoring
possible future changes from emissions reductions, as well as
changes that may also arise from other global phenomenon like
global warming. For example, vast areas of the still relatively
pristine Yukon Basin are permafrost peatlands, and if global
warming predictions are accurate, widespread melting of the peat
may occur and release mercury that has been accumulating for long
periods of time, or potentially worse, melting could catalyze
mercury methylation in the peat that is now not likely occurring.
For the Yukon River Basin study, we have accomplished or started
several tasks that will allow for establishment of several
critical baselines to detect possible future changes, and for
establishing what currently contamination levels are in this
extremely remote location.
|
|
- In the spring, summer and fall of 2001, we participated in a
larger effort to plan and conduct a complete water chemistry
sampling along the more than 2200 miles of the Yukon River,
including mercury.
- In June, 2001, we participated in a survey of the Yukon
River, including many of its important tributaries that drain
possible mining enriched mercury areas.
- We participated in the scientific plan development for the
Yukon River study, including providing the text for a fact sheet
(published by Ed Landa) describing the mercury investigations for
this study
|
Project Hypotheses
1. Mercury methylation:
1a. Methylmercury is produced in the multitude of
intra- and lateral-stream sloughs and wetlands of the Yukon
River, and the annual flushing of these sub-ecosystems during
spring runoff regulates observed fluxes of MeHg in the River
itself.
1b. No new MeHg formation is currently active in the Yukon
basin, and measurable fluxes of MeHg at the present are the
result of mobilization of relic MeHg formed during warmer, wetter
historical times, retained in frozen peat lands, and only
recently mobilized by melting permafrost.
1c. Because MeHg formation is microbially mediated, warmer
conditions would likely yield higher methylation rates in native
soils and peat.
1d. Methylmercury levels in the Yukon Basin are generally low,
and are reflective of abiotic methylation in the atmospheric and
subsequent deposition of MeHg.
2. Mercury and methylmercury sources and transport in the Yukon
River:
2a. Clear water tributaries and sloughs contribute
"reactive" Hg and MeHg to the Yukon River, however, the high
particulate loads quickly scavenge the Hg and MeHg from aqueous
solution and limit the methylation and bioaccumulation
processes.
2b. Glacial erosion and melt water mobilize "geologic"
particulate mercury from watershed sources (both intact natural
mineralized areas and areas contaminated by past or current
mining activity) down gradient to the Yukon River, where
sedimentation in methylmercury forming environments (sloughs and
wetlands).
2c. Annual flooding and flushing of the Yukon Basin wetlands by
snow and glacial melt water enriched in particulate mercury
stimulates methylation due to the combined influences of
inundation and mercury loading.
2d. Although spring floods bring high loads of particulate,
inorganic mercury to the Yukon Basin, this mercury pool is
largely unreactive and the more reactive and bioavailable mercury
in rainfall is what drives MeHg formation.
3. Gaseous mercury production and fluxes:
3a. Gaseous mercury production and evasion is a
result of photo reduction by UV light, and due to the continual
sunlight conditions of high latitude sites, mercury depletion of
wetland surfaces will results and limits MeHg formation.
3b. Gaseous mercury production and subsequent evasion from the
water column is an important process in most ecosystems, however,
the high turbidity of the Yukon River prevents (or greatly
limits) this process.
3c. Although significant total mercury levels exist in the Yukon
River, the majority is particulate and not sensitive to photo
reduction by ultraviolet sunlight.
|
Project Sampling Sites
Photos taken during field work for the Yukon
project.
|