|
||||||||||||||||||||
ReferencesBiemer PP. 1991. Measurement Errors in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Cox B, Jang D, Edson D, Rathbun K, Moonesinghe R. 2000. Sampling Errors for SESTAT: 1993/1995 and 1997. Unpublished manuscript, Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. Dillman DA. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Fowler FJ Jr. 1993. Survey Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Fowler FJ Jr. 1995. Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Groves RM. 1989. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kannankutty N, Wilkinson R. 1999. SESTAT: A Tool for Studying Scientists and Engineers in the United States. NSF 99-337. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf99337/start.htm. Keathley D, Riker C, Hicks L. 1995. Results of the 1993 National Survey of College Graduates Modal Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. Mangione TW. 1995. Mail Surveys: Improving the Quality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. National Science Foundation. 1999. SESTAT Design and Methodology. http://srsstats.sbe.nsf.gov/docs/techinfo.html. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. Current Population Survey: Design and Methodology. Technical Paper 63. Washington, DC. http://www.census.gov/prod/2000pubs/tp63.pdf. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1997. Employment and Earnings April 1997. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
|
||||||||||||||||||||