 |
 |
 |
 |
Fiscal Year 2008 Exhibit 300s
Global Acquisition System (GLAS)
| Exhibit 300 FY2009 | | | | | | | | Exhibit 300 FY2009 | | | | | | PART I: SUMMARY INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION | | In Part I, complete Sections A, B, C, and D for all capital assets (IT and non-IT). Complete Sections E and F for IT capital assets. | | | | | | | Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets) | | The following series of questions are to be completed for all investments. | | | | | | | I. A. 1. Date of Submission: | | 2007-09-14 | | | | |
| I. A. 4. Name of this Capital Asset: | | (short text - 250 characters) | | | GLobal Acquisition System (GLAS) | | | | |
| I. A. 5. Unique Project (Investment) Identifier: | | For IT investment only, see section 53. For all other, use agency ID system. | | | 184-15-01-01-01-4061-00 | | | | |
| I. A. 6. What kind of investment will this be in FY2009? | | Please NOTE: Investments moving to O&M in FY2009, with Planning/Acquisition activities prior to FY2009 should not select O&M. These investments should indicate their current status. | | | Mixed Life Cycle | | | | |
| I. A. 8. Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this, closes in part or in whole, an identified agency performance gap: | | (long text - 2500 characters) | | | Project Description
Through the implementation of a web-based, commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) solution, the end-to-end procurement process will:
- be automated and business processes will be standardized and streamlined,
- enable comprehensive capturing of acquisition-related data for use in Agency reporting and executive analysis; and
- enhance agency’s ability to provide consistent, accurate, complete and timely reporting.
USAID selected Compusearch’s PRISM product as the tool to support the GLobal Acquisition System (GLAS). GLAS will be fully interfaced with the agency’s financial management system of record, Phoenix. In addition, GLAS will support e-Government initiatives, to include FedBizOpps and FPDS-NG. The new system will be deployed throughout the agency, to include USAID Washington and the overseas missions.
GLAS was deployed to 11 offices in AID/W in December 2006 for production pilot use. The pilot surfaced other requirements and shortfalls that need to be implemented and corrected prior to full production deployment. These were confirmed by an Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) analysis, and an Office of the Inspector General (OIG) audit.
Project Scope
The scope of the GLAS project is based upon the selection of an alternative presented during the GLAS re-plan exercise conducted during the third quarter of FY2007 modified by Agency budget constraints.
The re-planned GLAS project will include the baseline GLAS functionality, Washington and overseas mission pilot deployment, training available to 100% of users, increased help desk support, dedicated disaster recovery, three additional releases and increased on-site support as part of world wide deployments, and an identified program risk reserve.
Project Justification
The legacy New Management System (NMS), Acquisition and Assistance (A&A) which is being used for procurement in AIDW uses out-of –date technology and it is at risk of being irreparable should major malfunction occur. GLAS is integrated with the Joint Financial Management System (JFMS) – Phoenix.
USAID and State have created a joint Strategic Plan developed for fiscal years 2004 through 2009. The GLAS initiative will further the Agency’s efforts at achieving the objective, Strengthen Consular and Management Capabilities. GLAS will address the Strategic Priority areas of – Human Resources, Information Technology, Planning and Accountability, and Administrative Services. | | | | |
| I. A. 9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request? | | yes | | | | | | | | I. A. 9. a. If "yes," what was the date of this approval? | | 2007-08-23 | | | | |
|
| I. A. 10. Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit? | | yes | | | | |
| I. A. 12. Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project? | | yes | | | | | | | | I. A. 12. a. Will this investment include electronic assets (including computers)? | | yes | | | | |
| I. A. 12. b. Is this investment for new construction or major retrofit of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to non-IT assets only) | | no | | | | | | | | I. A. 12. b. 1. If "yes," is an ESPC or UESC being used to help fund this investment? | | | |
| I. A. 12. b. 2. If "yes," will this investment meet sustainable design principles? | | | |
| I. A. 12. b. 3. If "yes," is it designed to be 30% more energy efficient than relevant code? | | | |
|
|
| I. A. 13. Does this investment directly support one of the PMA initiatives? | | yes | | | | | | | | I. A. 13. a. If "yes," check all that apply: | | Budget Performance Integration | | | Financial Performance | | | Expanded E-Government | | | Competitive Sourcing | | | | |
| I. A. 13. b. Briefly and specifically describe for each selected how this asset directly supports the identified initiative(s)? (e.g. If E-Gov is selected, is it an approved shared service provider or the managing partner?) | | (medium text - 500 characters) | | | Financial Performance - Financial system integrated, rather than paper based; Budget and Performance Integration - Financial integration and enhanced reporting & planning; Expanded E-Government - Procurement documents in electronic format allowing routing and approval between USAID employees and suppliers; and Competitive Sourcing - Electronic delivery systems (FEDBIZOPS & FPDS-NG) will make Agency procurement information available to potential bidders.___________________ | | | | |
|
| I. A. 14. Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)? (For more information about the PART, visit www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part.) | | yes | | | | | | | | I. A. 14. a. If "yes," does this investment address a weakness found during the PART review? | | yes | | | | |
| I. A. 14. b. If "yes," what is the name of the PARTed Program? | | (short text - 250 characters) | | | USAID OE Management Accountability | | | | |
| I. A. 14. c. If "yes," what PART rating did it receive? | | Moderately Effective | | | | |
|
| I. A. 15. Is this investment for information technology? | | yes | | | | |
| I. A. 16. What is the level of the IT Project? (per CIO Council PM Guidance) | Level 1 - Projects with low-to-moderate complexity and risk. Example: Bureau-level project such as a stand-alone information system that has low- to-moderate complexity and risk.
Level 2 - Projects with high complexity and/or risk which are critical to the mission of the organization. Examples: Projects that are part of a portfolio of projects/systems that impact each other and/or impact mission activities. Department-wide projects that impact cross-organizational missions, such as an agency-wide system integration that includes large scale Enterprise Resource Planning (e.g., the DoD Business Mgmt Modernization Program).
Level 3 - Projects that have high complexity, and/or risk, and have government-wide impact. Examples: Government-wide initiative (E-GOV, President's Management Agenda). High interest projects with Congress, GAO, OMB, or the general public. Cross-cutting initiative (Homeland Security). | | | Level 2 | | | | |
| I. A. 17. What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per CIO Council’s PM Guidance): | | (1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment;(2) Project manager qualification is under review for this investment;(3) Project manager assigned to investment, but does not meet requirements;(4) Project manager assigned but qualification status review has not yet started;(5) No Project manager has yet been assigned to this investment | | | (1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment | | | | |
| I. A. 18. Is this investment identified as "high risk" on the Q4-FY 2007 agency high risk report (per OMB Memorandum M-05-23)? | | yes | | | | |
| I. A. 19. Is this a financial management system? | | yes | | | | | | | | I. A. 19. a. If "yes," does this investment address a FFMIA compliance area? | | yes | | | | | | | | I. A. 19. a. 1. If "yes," which compliance area | | (short text - 250 characters) | | | Integrated Financial Systems | | | | |
| I. A. 19. a. 2. If "no," what does it address? | | (medium text - 500 characters) | | | | |
|
| I. A. 19. b. If "yes," please identify the system name(s) and system acronym(s) as reported in the most recent financial systems inventory update required by Circular A-11 section 52 | | (long text - 2500 characters) | | | PHOENIX and JFMS | | | | |
|
| I. A. 20. What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2009 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%) | | | | | | |
| I. A. 21. If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities? | | n/a | | | | |
| I. A. 23. Are the records produced by this investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval? | | no | | | | |
| I. A. 24. Does this investment directly support one of the GAO High Risk Areas? | | Question 24 must be answered by all Investments: | | | yes | | | | |
|
| Section B: Summary of Spending (All Capital Assets) | | | | | | | I. B. 1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated "Government FTE Cost," and should be excluded from the amounts shown for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." The "TOTAL" estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report. | Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing and partner agencies).
Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented. | | | PY-1 and Spending Prior to 2007 | PY 2007 | CY 2008 | BY 2009 |
|---|
| Planning | $1.500 | $2.000 | $0.000 | $1.000 |
|---|
| Acquisition | $10.700 | $13.010 | $0.000 | $9.000 |
|---|
| Subtotal Planning and Acquisition | $12.200 | $15.010 | $0.000 | $10.000 |
|---|
| Operations and Maintenance | $0.000 | $0.000 | $2.600 | $0.000 |
|---|
| TOTAL | $12.200 | $15.010 | $2.600 | $10.000 |
|---|
| Government FTE Costs | $0.000 | $0.150 | $1.560 | $1.622 |
|---|
| Number of FTE represented by cost | $0.000 | $1.000 | $10.000 | $10.000 |
|---|
| | | | |
| I. B. 2. Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's? | | no | | | | | | | | I. B. 2. a. If "yes," How many and in what year? | | (medium text - 500 characters) | | | | |
|
| I. B. 3. If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2008 President's budget request, briefly explain those changes. | | (long text - 2500 characters) | | | The functionality for GLAS is now contained in a separate Exhibit 300. For the FY2008 submittal, the Joint Assistance Management System (JAMS) and the Procurement System Improvement Project (PSIP) projects were contained in a single Exhibit 300. GLAS contains much of the base functionality of PSIP along with program additions. Also, due to user requirements, an Inspector General (OIG) audit, and IV&V results, a re-plan of the GLAS project was held in the second quarter of 2007. This Exhibit 300 reflects the results of the re-plan effort. Also, due to budgetary constraints, the re-plan was further modified in the fourth quarter of FY07. A cost and schedule baseline review was held on 2/1/2008 and nn Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) will be held in the first quarter of 2008. TheSummary of Spending Table reflects additional constraints of the actual USAID FY08 budget. | | | | |
|
| Section D: Performance Information (All Capital Assets) | | In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300, performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the agency’s mission and strategic goals, and performance measures (indicators) must be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency's strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill. They are the internal and external performance benefits this investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved that do not have a quantitative measure. | | | | | | | I. D. 1. Table 1. Performance Information Table | In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300, performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the agency’s mission and strategic goals, and performance measures (indicators) must be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency's strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill. They are the internal and external performance benefits this investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved that do not have a quantitative measure.
Agencies must use the following table to report performance goals and measures for the major investment and use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding "Measurement Area" and "Measurement Grouping" identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for each of the four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at www.egov.gov. The table can be extended to include performance measures for years beyond FY 2009. | | | Fiscal Year | Strategic Goal(s) Supported | Measurement Area | Measurement Grouping | Measurement Indicator | Baseline | Target | Actual Results |
|---|
| 2007 | Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities | Mission and Business Results | Planning | Budget Execution Percentage of appropriated funds that are obligated using a world wide acquisition systems | 0% | 10% | 10 |
|---|
| 2007 | Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities | Customer Results | Services Acquisition | Availability: Number of domestic and overseas users benefiting from real time financial integration, web based paperless acquisition management | 0 | 200 | 200 |
|---|
| 2007 | Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities | Processes and Activities | Cycle Time | Cycle Time: Percentage of acquisition actions completed within standard Procurement Action Lead Times (PALTs) | Unknown | In Development | |
|---|
| 2007 | Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities | Technology | Information Management | Internal/External Data Sharing: Percentage of standard and ad hoc acquisition reports produced accurately and on time for internal and external stakeholders | Unknown | In Development | |
|---|
| 2008 | Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities | Mission and Business Results | Planning | BUDGET EXECUTION: PERCENTAGE OF APPROPRIATED FUNDS THAT ARE OBLIGATED USING A WORLD WIDE INTEGRATED PROCUREMENT SYSTEM | 10% | 20% | |
|---|
| 2008 | Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities | Customer Results | Service Efficiency | AVAILABILITY:NUMBER OF DOMESTIC AND OVERSEAS USERS BENEFITING FROM REAL TIME FINANCIAL INTEGRATION, WEB BASED PAPERLESS ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT | 200 | 300 | |
|---|
| 2008 | Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities | Processes and Activities | Cycle Time | Cycle Time: Percentage of acquisition actions completed within standard Procurement Action Lead Times (PALTs) | Unknown | 10% | |
|---|
| 2008 | Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities | Technology | Information Management | Internal/External Data Sharing: Percentage of standard and ad hoc acquisition reports produced accurately and on time for internal and external stakeholders | Unknown | 10 | |
|---|
| 2009 | Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities | Mission and Business Results | Planning | Budget Execution: Percentage of appropriated funds that are obligated using a world wide integrated acquisition system | 20% | 30% | |
|---|
| 2009 | Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities | Customer Results | Services Acquisition | Availability: Number of domestic and overseas users benefiting from real time financial integration, web based paperless assistance management | 300 | 800 | |
|---|
| 2009 | Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities | Processes and Activities | Cycle Time | Cycle Time: Percentage of procurement actions completed within standard Procurement Action Lead Times (PALTs) | 10% | 20% | |
|---|
| 2009 | Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities | Technology | Information Management | Internal/External Data Sharing: Percentage of standard and ad hoc reports produced accurately and on time for internal and external stakeholders | 10% | 20 | |
|---|
| 2010 | Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities | Mission and Business Results | Planning | Budget Execution: Percentage of appropriated funds that are obligated using a world wide integrated acquisition system | 30% | 50 | |
|---|
| 2010 | Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities | Customer Results | Services Acquisition | Availability: Number of domestic and overseas users benefiting from real time financial integration, web based paperless assistance management | 800 | 1200 | |
|---|
| 2010 | Strengthening Consular and Management CapabilitiesStrengthening Consular and Management Capabilities | Processes and Activities | Cycle Time | Cycle Time: Percentage of procurement actions completed within standard Procurement Action Lead Times (PALTs)_ | 20% | 40 | |
|---|
| 2010 | Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities | Technology | Information Management | Internal/External Data Sharing: Percentage of standard and ad hoc reports produced accurately and on time for internal and external stakeholders | 20 | 40 | |
|---|
| | | | |
|
| Section F: Enterprise Architecture (EA) (IT Capital Assets only) | | In order to successfully address this area of the business case and capital asset plan you must ensure the investment is included in the agency's EA and Capital Planning and Invesment Control (CPIC) process, and is mapped to and supports the FEA. You must also ensure the business case demonstrates the relationship between the investment and the business, performance, data, services, application, and technology layers of the agency's EA. | | | | | | | I. F. 1. Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture? | | no | | | | | | | | I. F. 1. a. If "no," please explain why? | | (long text - 2500 characters) | | | There is no stand alone USAID EA. Joint USAID and State EA. | | | | |
|
| I. F. 2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy? | | no | | | | | | | | I. F. 2. a. If "yes," provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment. | | (medium text - 500 characters) | | | | |
| I. F. 2. b. If "no," please explain why? | | (long text - 2500 characters) | | | There is no stand alone USAID EA. Joint USAID and State EA. | | | | |
|
| I. F. 3. Is this investment identified in a completed (contains a target architecture) and approved segment architecture? | | no | | | | | | | | I. F. 3. a. If "yes," provide the name of the segment architecture. | | (medium text - 500 characters) | | | | |
|
| I. F. 4. Service Component Reference Model (SRM) Table : | Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.egov.gov.
a. Use existing SRM Components or identify as “NEW”. A “NEW” component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM.
b. A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission.
c. ‘Internal’ reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. ‘External’ reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government.
d. Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount transferred to another agency to pay for the service. The percentages in this column can, but are not required to, add up to 100%. | | | Agency Component Name | Agency Component Description | FEA SRM Service Type | FEA SRM Component (a) | Service Component Reused - Component Name (b) | Service Component Reused - UPI (b) | Internal or External Reuse? (c) | BY Funding Percentage (d) |
|---|
| Back Office Services | Increase efficiency by reducing expenses so that costs of doing business are transparent, aggressively managed, and compare favorably with peer organizations. | Financial Management | Billing and Accounting | Billing and Accounting | | External | 2 |
|---|
| Back Office Services | Increase efficiency by reducing overhead expenses so that costs of doing business are transparent, aggressively managed, and compare favorably with peer organizations. | Financial Management | Credit / Charge | Credit / Charge | | External | 2 |
|---|
| Back Office Services | Increase efficiency by reducing overhead expenses so that costs of doing business are transparent, aggressively managed, and compare favorably with peer organizations. | Financial Management | Expense Management | Expense Management | | External | 2 |
|---|
| Back Office Services | Establish a customer service culture making the Agency’s own business systems as cost effective and user friendly as possible. | Financial Management | Payment / Settlement | Payment / Settlement | | External | 2 |
|---|
| Back Office Services | Ensure accountability and compliance with the letter and spirit of all applicable laws and regulations to achieve a clean audit opinion, deter legal disputes and acquire a sterling reputation for sound management. | Financial Management | Auditing | Auditing | | External | 2 |
|---|
| Back Office Services | Establish a customer service culture making the Agency’s own business systems as cost effective and user friendly as possible. | Financial Management | Currency Translation | Currency Translation | | External | 2 |
|---|
| Business Management Services | Promote partner inclusiveness in all business relationships to better meet the needs of internal and external customers and to ensure that small businesses are well represented. | Supply Chain Management | Procurement | Procurement | | External | 0 |
|---|
| Business Management Services | Promote partner inclusiveness in all business relationships to better meet the needs of internal and external customers and to ensure that small businesses are well represented. | Supply Chain Management | Sourcing Management | Sourcing Management | | External | 0 |
|---|
| Business Management Services | Promote partner inclusiveness in all business relationships to better meet the needs of internal and external customers and to ensure that small businesses are well represented. | Supply Chain Management | Catalog Management | Catalog Management | | External | 0 |
|---|
| Business Management Services | Promote partner inclusiveness in all business relationships to better meet the needs of internal and external customers and to ensure that small businesses are well represented. | Supply Chain Management | Ordering / Purchasing | Ordering / Purchasing | | External | 0 |
|---|
| Business Management Services | Increase efficiency by reducing overhead expenses so that costs of doing business are transparent, aggressively managed, and compare favorably with peer organizations. | Supply Chain Management | Invoice / Requisition Tracking and Approval | Invoice / Requisition Tracking and Approval | | External | 0 |
|---|
| | | | |
| I. F. 5. Table 1. Technical Reference Model (TRM) Table: | To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment.
a. Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications
b. In the Service Specification field, agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate. | | | FEA SRM Component | FEA TRM Service Area | FEA TRM Service Category | FEA TRM Service Standard | Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name) |
|---|
| Billing and Accounting | Service Access and Delivery | Access Channels | Other Electronic Channels | Uniform Resource Locator (URL) |
|---|
| Expense Management | Service Access and Delivery | Delivery Channels | Internet | Vendor Being Selected |
|---|
| Billing and Accounting | Service Access and Delivery | Delivery Channels | Internet | Section 508 |
|---|
| Payment / Settlement | Service Access and Delivery | Service Requirements | Legislative / Compliance | Section 508 |
|---|
| Billing and Accounting | Service Access and Delivery | Access Channels | Authentication / Single Sign-on | Transport Control Protocol (TCP) |
|---|
| Sourcing Management | Service Access and Delivery | Delivery Channels | Service Transport | Oracle |
|---|
| Sourcing Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Delivery Channels | Platform Independent | Oracle |
|---|
| Sourcing Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Service Requirements | Platform Independent | Oracle |
|---|
| Sourcing Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Service Transport | Database | Vendor Being Selected |
|---|
| Sourcing Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Presentation / Interface | Web Browser | Vendor Being Selected |
|---|
| Billing and Accounting | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Database / Storage | Integrated Development Environment | Vendor Being Selected |
|---|
| Billing and Accounting | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Access Channels | Servers / Computers | Vendor Being Selected |
|---|
| Payment / Settlement | Component Framework | Security | Supporting Security Services | Vendor Being Selected |
|---|
| Data Exchange | Component Framework | Data Interchange | Data Exchange | Vendor Being Selected |
|---|
| Sourcing Management | Component Framework | Business Logic | Platform Independent | Oracle |
|---|
| Sourcing Management | Service Interface and Integration | Data Management | Database Connectivity | WebMethods |
|---|
| Sourcing Management | Service Interface and Integration | Integration | Enterprise Application Integration | Vendor Being Selected |
|---|
| Sourcing Management | Service Interface and Integration | Interoperability | Data Types / Validation | Vendor Being Selected |
|---|
| NEW | Component Framework | Data Interchange | Data Exchange | Vendor Being Selected |
|---|
| NEW | Component Framework | Presentation / Interface | Static Display | Vendor Being Selected |
|---|
| | | | |
| I. F. 6. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)? | | yes | | | | | | | | I. F. 6. a. If "yes," please describe. | | (long text - 2500 characters) | | | GLAS will make use of FedBizOpps to disseminate acquisition information | | | | |
|
|
|
| PART IV: Planning For "Multi-Agency Collaboration" ONLY | | Part IV should be completed only for investments identified as an E-Gov initiative, an Line of Business (LOB) Initiative, or a Multi-Agency Collaboration effort., selected the “Multi-Agency Collaboration” choice in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above. Investments identified as “Multi-Agency Collaboration” will complete only Parts I and IV of the exhibit 300. | | | | | | | Section A: Multi-Agency Collaboration Oversight (All Capital Assets) | | Multi-agency Collaborations, such as E-Gov and LOB initiatives, should develop a joint exhibit 300. | | | | | | | IV. A. 1. Stakeholder Table | | As a joint exhibit 300, please identify the agency stakeholders. Provide the partner agency and partner agency approval date for this joint exhibit 300. | | | | | | |
| IV. A. 9. Will the selected alternative replace a legacy system in-part or in-whole? | | | | | | | IV. A. 9. a. If "yes," are the migration costs associated with the migration to the selected alternative included in this investment, the legacy investment, or in a separate migration investment? | | | |
| IV. A. 9. b. Table 1. If "yes," please provide the following information: | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
Back to Top ^
|
|
 |
 |
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:25:36 -0500
|
|
|
|
