PHMSA Gas Integrity Management
Time: 11/08/2008 05:32 PM

Frequently-Asked Question FAQ #41

FAQ-41: Use of Calendar Years versus Actual Years for Inspection Intervals

Go To FAQ#:

Question: Does the requirement that an operator establish inspection intervals not to exceed a specified number of years mean calendar years (i.e., pipe assessed in 2004 must be re-assessed during 2011) or actual years?

Answer: Re-assessments must be conducted within the specified number of actual years. For example, a pipe segment assessed on March 23, 2004 must be re-assessed before March 23, 2011, using at least confirmatory direct assessment. This segment would need to be re-assessed using one of the methods specified in the rule before March 23, 2014, March 23, 2019 or March 23, 2024, depending on its operating stress (see192.939).

These Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) are intended to clarify, explain, and promote better understanding of the pipeline integrity management rules. These FAQs are not substantive rules and do not create rights, assign duties, or impose new obligations not outlined in the existing integrity management regulations and standards. Requests for informal interpretations regarding the applicability of one or more of the pipeline integrity management rules to a specific situation may be submitted to PHMSA in accordance with 49 C.F.R. ยง 190.11.
DOT Website | PHMSA Website | Pipeline Safety Website | Feedback | Privacy Policy | FOIA