PHMSA Gas Integrity Management
Time: 11/08/2008 05:15 PM

Frequently-Asked Question FAQ #244

FAQ-244: "Should" in standards

Go To FAQ#:

Question: What is the OPS position with regard to implementation of "should" statements in industry standards that are invoked by the rule?

Answer: OPS expects operators to implement "should" statements in industry standards that are invoked by the rule. Operators may choose to implement an alternative approach in meeting the recommendations of invoked standards. If this approach is taken, program requirements for the alternative approach must exist in IM Program documents and records must be generated by the alternative approach. The IM Program documents must also technically justify that the alternative approach provides an equivalent level of protection. If an operator chooses not to implement a "should" statement in an invoked standard, a sound technical basis for why it has not been implemented must be documented in the IM Program documents.

These Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) are intended to clarify, explain, and promote better understanding of the pipeline integrity management rules. These FAQs are not substantive rules and do not create rights, assign duties, or impose new obligations not outlined in the existing integrity management regulations and standards. Requests for informal interpretations regarding the applicability of one or more of the pipeline integrity management rules to a specific situation may be submitted to PHMSA in accordance with 49 C.F.R. ยง 190.11.
DOT Website | PHMSA Website | Pipeline Safety Website | Feedback | Privacy Policy | FOIA